Upgrading 250GB drives to 750GB drives

We have an XServe RAID that is a few years old. It has 8 drive modules with 250GB drives and 6 blanks. We'd like to upgrade all available slots to 750GB drives.
Can I fill the blanks with 750GB drive modules and fill the existing modules with new 750GB drives and rebuild from there? I have read that I need to update the firmware to recognize the larger capacity. What about the controller module and fiber card. Will it work with the existing pieces or will I need to upgrade those as well?
Any other suggestions are welcome.
Thanks!
Stephe.
XServe G5 and Intel
6 Cluster Nodes
2 RAIDS
Bunch o' G5s and Mac Pros
HD Video, 3D Animation and Web Production House

Camelot wrote:
Any advice on types and brands for the drives?
Apple.
Apple doesn't manufacture drives. Last I checked only Seagate makes 750GB PATA drives, everyone else in the business seems to make only SATA drives that size or bigger.
Unfortunately nobody makes 1TB drives that are PATA, so it looks like the current crop of the drives mean the end of the line for the XServe RAID in terms of capacity.
While I have heard of people who've replaced the bundled drives with larger ones, with some success,
the blank drive bays have simple blanking plates - i.e. do not have the electronics required to actually
support a drive.
Apple do not sell empty drive modules (with the electronics, but no drive), which makes it difficult
to expand the array other than by getting drive modules from Apple.
Correct. However, if you upgrade from a system with 14 250GB drives, you have all the mounting hardware you need, you just have to swap the drives in the carriers.
If you just bought new drive modules for Apple for the current blanks, and opted to manually
upgrade the existing drives on your own you'd end up with mixed drives (vendor, models and
firmware) which, at best, will result in degraded performance.
This has not been an issue in the past. After all, when you have a drive failure, you end up often with different drive models and firmware versions, too. E.g. Hitachi discontinued the 250GB drive model that was originally in the XServe RAID, and replaced it with a different 250GB drive in their line up.
You had no choice but to mix models if a single drive failure required swapping drives. (To make matters worse, the new drive, while faster, was a tiny bit smaller, which really caused head aches!)
Even though the drives sourced from Apple are more expensive than you can find similarly-sized
drives elsewhere, you get server-grade drives, burned in, with known/standard firmware, and
vendor support by taking the Apple route.
Sorry, that's FUD without basis. No drive manufacturer will run a special assembly line for "Apple grade" drives. Worse, you buy a drive module from Apple, and you have at best a 1 year warranty. You buy the drives from Hitachi or Seagate directly, you have a three or five year warranty.
If you try to use the manufacturer's warranty on Apple sourced drives, the manufacturers will not honor it, because the drives are OEM drives sold at a big discount to Apple, which means they don't give any warrantee beyond what Apple gives.
In terms of what you get for the money, both in absolute price, and in terms of warranty, is much better if you get bare drives straight from the manufacturer than going with Apple's drives.
Without knowing your business I can't tell you what to do, but for me I can't bear the thought of
telling my clients that I lost their data because I opted to save $100 on a few hard drives.
If you're selling to clients, of course, Apple drives are better: there's more profit in those, because they are not a commodity like bare bones drives, but a brand-name special order item.
(that's not to say that third-party drives are necessarily less reliable than those sourced from
Apple, more that being able to say you had a problem even though you were using vendor
supported and provided parts goes a long way ).
Apple's support in regards to drives that fail after a year is non-existent, except if you get the $999 AppleCare contract, but that means you can buy quite a few replacement drives to cover that, and it's still only 3 years coverage, vs. 5 years for the drives direct from the manufacturer...
Obviously Apple needs to make a profit, and inventory, logistics, etc. for parts are expensive, so you pay in essence for the convenience of getting a module you can just shove into the unit and be done. No need to mess with screwdrivers, etc.
Ronald

Similar Messages

  • Can I upgrade my Xserve G5, 2.0Ghz machine with 1Tb drives, currently using 250Gb drives

    I need to replace one of the 250 gb raid drives on my Xserve G5 machine. 2.0 Ghz cpu.
    I would like to upgrade both drives but sales guy @ OWC not sure if this machine will support 1TB drives.
    Thanks for the help.

    Just to add to the conversation I just replaced my original 80GB drives in my dual-G5 Xserve with Seagate Constellation ES 500 GB ST3500514NS drives. They popped in and were recognized and I mirror RAIDed them together and asr-ed my system onto them and they booted the system from the mirror fine.
    I decided to try the Seagate Constellations after reading of other people's success with the larger (1TB) drives in another thread and so far they seem to work fine out of the box without jumper hassles or anything.
    I'll update if anything seems wrong but super painless upgrade so far. I'll probably order 4 or 6 more and upgrade some of the other boxes too.
    My $.02,
    =Tod

  • Upgrade Hard Drives?

    Hi,
    I have read quite a few posts and also talked to Apple Support - but I am still confused.
    I have a MAC PRO purchased in October, 2007. It has a 500 GB hard drive in bay #1 for all my programs and a little data. I also have 3 hard drives in bays #2, #3 and #4. These three are 750GB each and are used only for data files. My operating system is MAC OS X version 10.4.11.
    My question is, can I replace the 3 x 750GB drives used for data storage with either 1.5TB or 2.0 TB drives? (I understand that the WD 2.0TB drive is slower).
    Or, is there some sort of max amount of internal storage allowed based on motherboard or something?
    MAC Support said they could only say go to 3 x 1TB drives. But according to some posts, I think some people have tried larger drives OK.
    Any help will be much appreciated.
    Thank you.

    I too am looking to upgrade the hard drive in my Mac Pro. I currently have the original 250GB drive that came with my machine as my primary (for apps and user account stuff), a secondary 250GB drive (for my actual work), and a 500GB drive in bay 3 that I use as a Time Machine drive.
    I was thinking about adding a 1TB drive as my primary and move the 250GB out as a work backup/catch all/scratch disk. I'm looking at the WD Black 1TB, but I'm concerned about reliability. Are 1TB drives a lot more reliable now than when they first came out? If reliability is more important to me, should I just stick with a smaller 500GB drive since I probably don't really need a terabyte for my primary?

  • Nvidia is not working after upgrading nvidia driver and kernel

    I upgraded nvidia driver and kernel. After rebooting graphic mode is not working. Here xorg.o.log
    [ 281.180]
    This is a pre-release version of the X server from The X.Org Foundation.
    It is not supported in any way.
    Bugs may be filed in the bugzilla at http://bugs.freedesktop.org/.
    Select the "xorg" product for bugs you find in this release.
    Before reporting bugs in pre-release versions please check the
    latest version in the X.Org Foundation git repository.
    See http://wiki.x.org/wiki/GitPage for git access instructions.
    [ 281.181]
    X.Org X Server 1.10.0.902 (1.10.1 RC 2)
    Release Date: 2011-04-08
    [ 281.181] X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
    [ 281.181] Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.38-ARCH i686
    [ 281.181] Current Operating System: Linux localhost 2.6.38-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Mar 30 07:14:27 UTC 2011 i686
    [ 281.181] Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz26 root=/dev/disk/by-uuid/b766e332-2aad-4047-8562-567180150189 ro quiet
    [ 281.182] Build Date: 11 April 2011 10:49:12AM
    [ 281.182]
    [ 281.182] Current version of pixman: 0.20.2
    [ 281.182] Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org
    to make sure that you have the latest version.
    [ 281.182] Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
    (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
    (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
    [ 281.183] (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Thu Apr 14 17:11:37 2011
    [ 281.183] (==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf"
    [ 281.183] (==) Using config directory: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d"
    [ 281.183] (==) ServerLayout "Layout0"
    [ 281.183] (**) |-->Screen "Screen0" (0)
    [ 281.183] (**) | |-->Monitor "Monitor0"
    [ 281.184] (**) | |-->Device "Videocard0"
    [ 281.184] (**) |-->Input Device "Keyboard0"
    [ 281.184] (**) |-->Input Device "Mouse0"
    [ 281.184] (**) Option "Xinerama" "0"
    [ 281.184] (==) Automatically adding devices
    [ 281.184] (==) Automatically enabling devices
    [ 281.184] (WW) The directory "/usr/share/fonts/OTF/" does not exist.
    [ 281.184] Entry deleted from font path.
    [ 281.184] (==) FontPath set to:
    /usr/share/fonts/misc/,
    /usr/share/fonts/TTF/,
    /usr/share/fonts/Type1/,
    /usr/share/fonts/100dpi/,
    /usr/share/fonts/75dpi/
    [ 281.184] (==) ModulePath set to "/usr/lib/xorg/modules"
    [ 281.184] (WW) Hotplugging is on, devices using drivers 'kbd', 'mouse' or 'vmmouse' will be disabled.
    [ 281.184] (WW) Disabling Keyboard0
    [ 281.184] (WW) Disabling Mouse0
    [ 281.184] (II) Loader magic: 0x822e120
    [ 281.184] (II) Module ABI versions:
    [ 281.184] X.Org ANSI C Emulation: 0.4
    [ 281.184] X.Org Video Driver: 10.0
    [ 281.184] X.Org XInput driver : 12.2
    [ 281.184] X.Org Server Extension : 5.0
    [ 281.185] (--) PCI:*(0:1:0:0) 10de:0322:0000:0000 rev 161, Mem @ 0xfd000000/16777216, 0xe8000000/134217728, BIOS @ 0x????????/131072
    [ 281.185] (WW) Open ACPI failed (/var/run/acpid.socket) (No such file or directory)
    [ 281.185] (II) LoadModule: "extmod"
    [ 281.185] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libextmod.so
    [ 281.185] (II) Module extmod: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
    [ 281.185] compiled for 1.10.0.902, module version = 1.0.0
    [ 281.185] Module class: X.Org Server Extension
    [ 281.185] ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 5.0
    [ 281.185] (II) Loading extension MIT-SCREEN-SAVER
    [ 281.185] (II) Loading extension XFree86-VidModeExtension
    [ 281.185] (II) Loading extension XFree86-DGA
    [ 281.185] (II) Loading extension DPMS
    [ 281.185] (II) Loading extension XVideo
    [ 281.185] (II) Loading extension XVideo-MotionCompensation
    [ 281.185] (II) Loading extension X-Resource
    [ 281.185] (II) LoadModule: "dbe"
    [ 281.185] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libdbe.so
    [ 281.185] (II) Module dbe: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
    [ 281.185] compiled for 1.10.0.902, module version = 1.0.0
    [ 281.185] Module class: X.Org Server Extension
    [ 281.185] ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 5.0
    [ 281.185] (II) Loading extension DOUBLE-BUFFER
    [ 281.185] (II) LoadModule: "glx"
    [ 281.186] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so
    [ 281.216] (II) Module glx: vendor="NVIDIA Corporation"
    [ 281.217] compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.0.0
    [ 281.217] Module class: X.Org Server Extension
    [ 281.217] (II) NVIDIA GLX Module 173.14.28 Wed Sep 29 10:17:05 PDT 2010
    [ 281.217] (II) Loading extension GLX
    [ 281.217] (II) LoadModule: "record"
    [ 281.217] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/librecord.so
    [ 281.217] (II) Module record: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
    [ 281.217] compiled for 1.10.0.902, module version = 1.13.0
    [ 281.217] Module class: X.Org Server Extension
    [ 281.217] ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 5.0
    [ 281.217] (II) Loading extension RECORD
    [ 281.217] (II) LoadModule: "dri"
    [ 281.217] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libdri.so
    [ 281.217] (II) Module dri: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
    [ 281.217] compiled for 1.10.0.902, module version = 1.0.0
    [ 281.217] ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 5.0
    [ 281.217] (II) Loading extension XFree86-DRI
    [ 281.217] (II) LoadModule: "dri2"
    [ 281.217] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libdri2.so
    [ 281.218] (II) Module dri2: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
    [ 281.218] compiled for 1.10.0.902, module version = 1.2.0
    [ 281.218] ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 5.0
    [ 281.218] (II) Loading extension DRI2
    [ 281.218] (II) LoadModule: "nvidia"
    [ 281.218] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.so
    [ 281.218] (II) Module nvidia: vendor="NVIDIA Corporation"
    [ 281.218] compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.0.0
    [ 281.218] Module class: X.Org Video Driver
    [ 281.218] ================ WARNING WARNING WARNING WARNING ================
    [ 281.219] This server has a video driver ABI version of 10.0 that is not
    supported by this NVIDIA driver. Please check
    http://www.nvidia.com/ for driver updates or downgrade to an X
    server with a supported driver ABI.
    [ 281.219] =================================================================
    [ 281.219] (II) NVIDIA dlloader X Driver 173.14.28 Wed Sep 29 09:55:18 PDT 2010
    [ 281.219] (II) NVIDIA Unified Driver for all Supported NVIDIA GPUs
    [ 281.219] (--) using VT number 7
    [ 281.222] (II) Loading sub module "fb"
    [ 281.222] (II) LoadModule: "fb"
    [ 281.222] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libfb.so
    [ 281.222] (II) Module fb: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
    [ 281.222] compiled for 1.10.0.902, module version = 1.0.0
    [ 281.222] ABI class: X.Org ANSI C Emulation, version 0.4
    [ 281.222] (II) Loading sub module "wfb"
    [ 281.222] (II) LoadModule: "wfb"
    [ 281.222] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libwfb.so
    [ 281.223] (II) Module wfb: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
    [ 281.223] compiled for 1.10.0.902, module version = 1.0.0
    [ 281.223] ABI class: X.Org ANSI C Emulation, version 0.4
    [ 281.223] (II) Loading sub module "ramdac"
    [ 281.223] (II) LoadModule: "ramdac"
    [ 281.223] (II) Module "ramdac" already built-in
    [ 281.223] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.so
    [ 281.226] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libwfb.so
    [ 281.226] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/libfb.so
    [ 281.226] (II) UnloadModule: "nvidia"
    [ 281.226] (II) Unloading nvidia
    [ 281.226] (II) UnloadModule: "wfb"
    [ 281.226] (II) Unloading wfb
    [ 281.226] (II) UnloadModule: "fb"
    [ 281.226] (II) Unloading fb
    [ 281.226] (EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration.
    [ 281.226]
    Fatal server error:
    [ 281.226] no screens found
    [ 281.226]
    Please consult the The X.Org Foundation support
    at http://wiki.x.org
    for help.
    [ 281.226] Please also check the log file at "/var/log/Xorg.0.log" for additional information.
    [ 281.226]

    bilgee0629 wrote:
    Arjann wrote:
    I think the new xorg-server is the problem as it isn't supported by this nvidia driver yet.
    You could try to install the nouveau driver until nvidia comes with a new version of the 173 branch that supports xorg-server 1.10, see: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Nouveau for information. As lower-grade options, you might also consider xf86-video-nv and xf86-video-vesa.
    Should i uninstall nvidia driver, then install it?
    I think thats the easy way yes, else you have to blacklist the nvidia kernel module.. check the wiki link of nouveau for details.

  • Migrating a Single 250GB Drive to 2TB RAID 5 Array

    My Mac Pro has the original 250GB hard drive it came with. I just purchased a Mac Pro RAID Card. My intention is to install 2 1TB drives, and create a RAID 5 with the three drives. Obviously the new set will only use 250GB on each of the 2 new 1TB drives. Once the array is fully built out, I plan on removing the 250GB drive, and have the array rebuild on the 3rd 1TB drive. This should leave me at the same place i was with the 250GB drive installed.
    What I am wondering is that will the RAID utility now see extra space on all three drives, and subsequently allow me to create an additional RAID 5 set with the available space? I'm doing this in lieu of cloning the 250GB to a 1TB drive, boot from the 1TB drive, and then migrating a single boot volume to a RAID set.
    Any ideas is appreciated. Thanks.

    A thread that looked into RAID5.
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1070319&tstart=0
    A good start, AMUG review of the Mac Pro 2008.
    http://www.amug.org/amug-web/html/amug/reviews/articles/intel/macpro-2008/
    NewerTech to use ODD SATA ports to attach your OEM and one other drive. Free up your four internal drive bays.
    http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Newer%20Technology/MPQXES2/
    Alternative to Apple Pro RAID - HighPoint RocketRAID 3522
    Barefeats: RAID 3 vs RAID 5 vs RAID 6
    http://www.barefeats.com/hard101.html
    AMUG Review HighPoint RocketRAID 3522
    http://www.amug.org/amug-web/html/amug/reviews/articles/highpoint/3522/
    4-drive RAID performance
    http://www.barefeats.com/harper13.html
    Estimating capacity:
    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=306212
    Personally, from using RAIDs, don't mix drives with different performance, platters, seek or firmware.

  • Upgrade hard drive size with mirrored RAID

    First of all thanks for your help.
    I have a G5 XServe with (3) 250GB Drives
    (1) drive is for the OS .... great perfect no change needed.
    The other to drives are mirrored to eath other and hold 240GB worth of work.
    I would like to buy (2) 500GB Drives to replace the 250GB Drives.
    What is the easiest way to do this?
    Idea 1) Will this work???
    Break the raid by ejecting one of drives.
    Put in one new 500GB Drive.
    Copy all data from 250GB to 500GB
    Eject 250GB drive
    Put in other 500GB drive.
    Re-set up Mirror with out losing data?
    Idea 2)
    Copy it all to an external drive....
    Install new 500GB drives
    Set up Mirror
    Copy data back.
    Hmmm... either way I'll have to set up all of my share points?
    Thanks for helping me think this through.

    Either path will work.
    The first should be faster (the data only needs to be copied one), the second gives you a spare/backup copy of the data which might come in handy later.
    Sharepoints are referenced by path, so as long as the new 500GB mirror is mounted in the same place as the existing 250GB mirror, your sharepoints should remain intact.

  • Upgrading hard drive... need help on how to prepare current CS6 for reinstall on new hard drive

    I'm about to upgrade my hard drive to a larger one and will need to reinstall my CS6 Web/Design Suite... I've seen many people having issues with activation and licensing after they reformat their computers or buy a new one and try to install the programs on the new "system". How should I go about preparing my Adobe software on the current hard drive so I won't have any issues resintalling on the new hard drive? I will be installing CS6 Student/Teacher version on Windows 7 Pro 64-bit...
    Thanks for the help!

    Thanks!
    I wondered if that was all I needed, but when I built my new system and installed PS CS4 I kept getting errors. So, I went back to the old system and deactivated it and still got errors. Uninstalled it deactivated and still got errors on the new system. When I talked to Adobe they just kept telling me the key was invalid (even though I had been running that same program and key for the last 4 years without problems lol) and it was not a burnt copy or pirated. I had the orginal box with the original DVD case and serial number on the case... A friend of mine had upgraded their rig and went to a Suite so he gave me his CS4. But, needless to say (as it is said all over these forums apparently) Adobe was of no help at all so I had to buy a new version. I'm not looking to go through all of that BS again, haha.
    So as long as I deactivate the Suite (or do I need to deactivate each program separately?) I should be able to reformat (or upgrade hard drives) and reinstall CS6 as many times as I want? (I usually do a reformat like once a year to keep my computers clean and free of junk that may have been downloaded by other household members...)

  • Illustrator Cs5 will not open.  Recently upgraded hard Drive and upgraded to Maverick OS 10.9.3.  Where should I start troubleshooting?

    Illustrator Cs5 will not open.  Recently upgraded hard drive and upgraded to Maverick OS 10.9.3.  Where should I start troubleshooting?

    gj,
    Unless it has worked since the upgrading, I believe you should uninstall, run the Cleaner Tool, and reinstall.
    Use the CC Cleaner Tool to solve installation problems | CC, CS3-CS6

  • Orig 250Gb drive failed - Installing Barracuda 7200.12 SATA  1.5 TB drive

    My original 250Gb hard drive failed and I am going to install a Barracuda 7200.12 SATA 3Gb/s 1.5 TB Hard Drive (ST31500341AS). The old drive isn't completely dead. When I want to the apple store they were able to boot off of an external drive and my drive (after a while) mounted. I was able to transfer some of my files onto a second (500gb) drive that I have installed. During the transfer of one of the largest folders, the original 250Gb drive disconnected/was no longer mounted.
    Can I keep my original 250 Gb dive in my Mac Pro, install OS X 10.6.x on the new 1.5 TB hard drive, and then see if the original drive mounts so that I can try to recover my files? Will I have issues having the OS installed on the 2 drives? Does it matter which bay I install the new drive?

    You can install the OS to any of the internal drive bays, makes no difference.
    Because a drive that is failing can indeed cause problems for the SATA controller, I wold remove the bad drive when I install the OS. Once I have everything installed and working, I wold then shutdown and put the bad drive back into an empty bay, restart, and see if I cold access the bad drive.
    Tom
    Message was edited by: Tom Nelson1

  • XRAID Upgrade - added drives

    In looking around for answers on "how to copy or move data from one RAID Array to another while preserving ACL's and metadata" most answers I found were a bit vague. I'm hoping my experience will be of help to someone when they go looking for the same information.
    There are many methods to copying data from RAID to RAID - this post has some good ideas:
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=2434030&#2434030
    This is how I ended up moving my set of data for an XRAID attached to a G5 xserve running 10.4.7
    I have previously used ditto on other servers to move the data but ended up having to re-enable all my sharepoints afterwards which was a huge pain. This time I tried rsync (failed) and then asr.
    I first ran rsync -aEv from the first volume over to the next volume but got a lot of "file has vanished" errors - I found this explanation:
    http://listserv.cuny.edu/Scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind0607&L=macenterprise&T=0&O=A&P=256 15
    I thought I'd give ASR a try before going through ditto which I know will work (problem being having to re-share everything). Don't get me wrong, ditto keeps all the file sharing settings but you have to go into the workgroup manager and click the share boxes to get them to be shared again (maybe I missed something when doing it but that's what happened to me last time I had to do this).
    I had read that ASR didn't work properly in 10.4.6 here:
    http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/04/23/asr-broken-in-1046/
    but seeing as 10.4.7 had not really been discussed I figured I'd give it a whirl.
    I had roughly 700GB of data to move from a RAID 5 over 250GB drives onto a RAID5 on 500GB drives. First I disabled Filesharing. Then I used asr from the command line:
    #asr -source /XRAID1 -target /NewXRAID -erase
    I chose to erase the target so I could get block copy going to allow the fastest copy possible. It took about 5 hours - give or take - I wasn't paying much attention to it...
    I came back to the finished copy, ejected the smaller volume and re-enabled filesharing. To my dismay nothing appeared to be shared. Workgroup manager was asking me to remove sharepoints and re-add them saying they couldn't be found. I decided not to do that. Instead, I stopped filesharing services and restarted the server. This time I ejected both volumes - opened Disk Utility and mounted the larger XRAID volume by itself. I then started filesharing and IT WORKED! All my sharepoints were there and all the ACL's appeared to be functioning correctly. I've logged in as several different users and everything seems as it should. I also checked alias's I made on a remote desktop machine previous to starting to see if they worked and they do.
    Now, having two volumes with identical names can be a problem so to be safe I stopped Filesharing and mounted the smaller drive and re-named it (I'm keeping it as a backup just in case things go to pot when it goes live on Tuesday..). I then restarted the server again, left all drives mounted and started Filesharing again. The correct volume is shared and everything looks good.
    So if you need to move all your files from a smaller RAID to a larger one ASR in 10.4.7 seems to do the trick.
    Cheers,
    Simon

    Problem:
    Today we have reports that files are missing from the new RAID. Sure enough there are some files that ought to be there that aren't so I'm going to scrap this and go back to the original volume and do a ditto either tonight or on Friday night when I have more time to set the shares straight.
    Oh well so much for that.
    Simon
    The RAID is running the latest firmware and the server is running 10.4.7 on a Dual G5 XSERVE 4gb ram.

  • What is the best upgrade hard drive for a A1342?

    What is the best upgrade hard drive for an A1342 (white macbook)?

    Absolutely. I put a Samsung 840 in my early 2009 white macbook and it is the best computer upgrade I've ever done. I've also put an OWC SSD in my late 2009 iMac and highly recommend their drives. http://eshop.macsales.com

  • Playback jitters with 250GB drives

    I experienced stuttering and skips in iMovie playback with my first project on my new iMac 20". Had no issues after the project was moved from my internal 250GB drive to an external firewire drive.
    Others are reporting similar issues with iMovie and Quicktime with the 250GB drives in recent machines.
    see:
    Gregory Gillis, "iMac 250GB Hard Disk Help Needed", 06:58pm Aug 23, 2005 CDT
    Anyone else with this same issue? Could be due to "write verify" break-in period for these drives.

    IMovie: How to Save Projects to Another Hard Disk
    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=93296
    See "Important Considerations" at the bottom.
    EDIT:
    Ooooops. I read your message "backwards", thinking the problem started when you moved the project to the external drive.
    There are some good points in the article anyway...

  • Upgrading SATA drives on Dual 2G G5

    I have a standard configuration Dual 2G G5. I have added a 250GB drive. Now I would like to replace those drives with larger capacity drives - perhaps 750 GB or 1T drives. Will the machine allow me to do that?

    Hi Greg Smith10-
    Yes you can do this, and since you have added a drive before I am guessing you know what is involved and what you need to do to physically accomplish the task.
    Luck-
    -DaddyPaycheck

  • Upgrading Hard Drive - Should i spend extra money for a 7200?

    I am looking at some 500gb Hard Drives for my Unibody Macbook, and I am wondering if I should spend a couple extra dollars (about 20) to buy a 7200rpm drive over a 5400rpm drive. Would the benefits be noticeable? I am satisfied with the current drive's speed, what is it's speed? I have the basic 250gb drive.

    Yes, the 7200 RPM drive will perform quicker than the slower drive. I would be especially careful to get one with as large a cache memory as possible although I think 16 MBs is the largest available on a notebook drive. What you currently have is 5400 RPM.

  • I have a 2008 Mac Book Pro partitioned running windows and are running out of drive space. Can I upgrade hard drive for more capacity?

    I have a 2008 Mac Book Pro partitioned running windows and are running out of drive space. Can I upgrade hard drive for more capacity? I purchased a faster drive initially, but has 200 GB capacity. I am running out of room and would like to upgrade for more space if possible.
    Can anyone suggest an alternative?

    You don't need to partition your drive to run Fusion, only if you want to run Bootcamp.
    If you have space on your Windows partition, I would suggest you backup your Windows partition, and then, delete the partition using Disk Utility.
    You can now restore your virtual machine to a single volume or repartition if you prefer.
    I would consider upgrading to a unibody MBP (used, refurbished will do) just to be able to access the HD. Opening the pre-unibody MBP is not something you would want to do.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Adobe Forms wo/Interactive Fields Completed in Workspaces?

    Can I complete an Adobe form without interactive fields in Workspaces?  If so, how?

  • Receiving Picture Texts

    How come I have had two people send me picture texts and I have not received them? I have signed up and am paying for the multimedia services. Anyone else having this problem?

  • Email View Settings Help

    I have had problems with outlook 2013 since Aug or Sept of 2014. Windows 8 (8.1) I have had outlook 2013 on my work desktop windows 8.1 computer since September 2014. How do I view my new inbox and sent messages? I view the received messages as popup

  • PO generated automatically when shipment cost created.

    Hi, Presently, the system is configured such that a PO is generated automatically for the forwarding agent when the shipment cost is saved. A service entry sheet and service acceptance are also created automatically against this PO. The client wishes

  • SCM and Forms Builder version control

    Hi, I would like to start using Oracle 10g SCM repository with Forms builder for version control. The idea would be that the forms developers do not use Repository Object Navigator. I read from the instructions that Oracle9i Forms Developer requires