Urgent  - Customizing transport order not present in transDIR

Hello Gurus
We have an issue with tranport Order for a customizing project . After a system
migration the development team started to work on the DEV server without TMS and transport routes to QUA configured . Tasks and Request were by mistake released then as Local change request in DEV  . Now the TMS has been configured , but  the tasks can not be exported in the /cofiles /datas directories to be imported in QUA .
Is it possible somehow to reassign the scope of the Released Change request to transportable or regenerate the task in order to transport it to QUA, as the whole customizing represent more 1 week of work !
Thanks a lot for your help .

Thanks for your fast answer
I was able to reassign the Object to a new transportable request one in SE01
Menu  -> Object list  ->  include object .
I will instruct the customer to do so and keep you posted .
What is the difference with the copy tranpost request option ?
Many  thanks to both of you .
Best regards .
Lionel

Similar Messages

  • Urgent: Custom font style not appearing in PDF output only

    Hi,
    For a customer, I received customer specific font styles(ttf font files) which I installed on my machine and then copied those files in Oracle\BI Publisher\BI Publisher Desktop\Template Builder for Word\fonts as well as in JRE/lib/fonts. Then I created a template in word and font there appears as custom font.
    Now I am getting that font style in all output formats(rtf,ppt,excel) except the PDF output. I am using Oracle BI Publisher desktop alone. Not sure what I missed because of which text font is not changing in PDF version only. I checked the PDF properties and there also custom font is not getting mapped.
    Thanks in advance.

    Here is the link that describes how to set up the font mapping for PDF output: Look for "Font Mappings (for PDF output)"
    BI Publisher Demo Library</title><meta name="Title" content="BI Publisher Demo Library">…http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/bi-publisher/learnmore/demo-library-toc-173301.html
    Thanks,
    Bipuser

  • Urgent: Customized Routine Problem: Not updating related databse tables.

    Hi Gurus,
    We made some changes in customized routine of pricing condition type.
    Requirement :
    "A" condition type which is appearing in pricing of sales order which we want to be split into Billing document i.e.in  Invoice. The amount should split as per the invoiced quantity,. Earlier it was redeterminig from condition master"
    Logic in routine:
    "we are checking respective sales order for Invoice. From Sales order value we are finding out document condition number  in VBAK table. then in KONV table for respective value we are checking "A" condition type is available or not.
    If it is available we are just copying the value and depending upon the Invoiced qty, We are passing to the same condition type.
    Problem:
    Value is appearing in Invoice document but it is not updating the related database tables e.g. KONV for(Invoice document condition No.)

    Hi Gurus,
    We made some changes in customized routine of pricing condition type.
    Requirement :
    "A" condition type which is appearing in pricing of sales order which we want to be split into Billing document i.e.in  Invoice. The amount should split as per the invoiced quantity,. Earlier it was redeterminig from condition master"
    Logic in routine:
    "we are checking respective sales order for Invoice. From Sales order value we are finding out document condition number  in VBAK table. then in KONV table for respective value we are checking "A" condition type is available or not.
    If it is available we are just copying the value and depending upon the Invoiced qty, We are passing to the same condition type.
    Problem:
    Value is appearing in Invoice document but it is not updating the related database tables e.g. KONV for(Invoice document condition No.)

  • Customizing transports

    We run 4.6C on iSeries. Recently we upgraded the OS to V6R1. Development and test systems are on one server. Production has its own server. After the OS upgrade customizing transports are not applied to production. The transport log shows all is well but the changes are not on production system. I have to run $SYNC to apply the changes to production system. Workbench transports do not have this problem. Has anyone experienced this issue after OS upgrade to v6r1?
    I appreciate your suggestions.
    Berhanu

    Hi Berhanu,
    then I would assume - which I cannot believe - that the buffer sync is "dead" ... it happens all 2 minutes and if the timestamp is rubbish, this would be an option - have seen this once only ...
    Then I can only suggest an OSS ticket, if it is reproducible and the parameter is correct ...
    ... still cannot believe that ...
    Regards
    Volker Gueldenpfennig, consolut international ag
    http://www.consolut.com http://www.4soi.de http://www.easymarketplace.de

  • PO stock transport order -  item change - field Customer in tab shipping

    Dear all,
    because of an existing modification it is necessary that I have to update the field customer at shipping tab of an stock transport order item when item's storage location was changed within TAC ME22N or ME21N.
    Unfortunately SAP has not implemented this functionality within BAPIs or Userexits.
    Does anyone has an idea where we have to place this modification?
    Until the installation of the last support package, the modification changed the customer within include MM06EFPV_PTV_FUELLEN, form ptv_fuellen before calling function SD_TRANSFERDATA_DETERMINE and it worked.
    Best regards and thank you for your replay!
    Michael Schleis
    PS: We are using SAP R/3 Enterprise Release 4.7 and the following Support Package
    SAP_APPL     470     0029     SAPKH47029     Logistics and Accounting
    Edited by: Michael Schleis on Mar 5, 2008 5:35 PM

    Piotr,
    You can default the shipping point in your STO based on the combination of shipping conditon (maintained in customer master), loading group (maintained in material master) and the plant in SPRO->Logistics Execution->Shipping->Basic Shipping Functions->Shipping Point and Goods Receiving Point Determination->Assign Shipping Points.
    If you don't use any of the entries (for instance if you don't use the loading group), then just leave the entry blank in config.
    Hope this helps.
    H Narayan

  • Stock Transport Order Doc not being saved

    Hi Gurus,
    I need your help urgently
    When I save a stock transport order, the system gives me a message and number indicating that the records have been saved.
    When I try to display or process a goods issue against this document it says that the document does not exist.
    This document has the same number range with the standard PO which is very okay.
    The funny thing is that the stuff was working fine last week.
    Thanks for your support.

    Hi, Check the SBWP Transaction UpdateTermination message .Thier is some problem with config.Just check the message and write back the message number.
    and the details like.
    Update was terminated
    Transaction..  
    Update key...  
    Error Info...                   
    We will try something
    Lekhram

  • Stock Transport Order-shipping point not determined

    Hi MM Gurus,
    We need to set up STO for transferring stock from plant 2000 to 1000. I have completed following setting.
    IMG
    Enterprise Structure-Assignment-Sales and Distribution-Assign sales organization to company code
    Both the sales orgnizations are in same company code. We have only one company code.
    Enterprise Structure-Assignment-Sales and Distribution-Assign sales organization - distribution channel - plant
    The sales area 1000 is are assigned to both the plants 1000 & 2000 and sales area 2000 is also assigned to both the plants.
    Enterprise Structure-Assignment-Logistics Execution-Assign shipping point to plant
    Plant 1000 is assigned to sales area 1000 & 2000. Plant 2000 is assigned to sales area 1000 & 2000.
    Materials Management-Purchasing-Purchase Order-Set up Stock Transport Order-Define Shipping Data for Plants
    For plant 1000 & 2000 cusomer master 56 & 57 respectively are maintained. The sales orginzation for these plants are 1000 & 2000 respectively.
    Materials Management-Purchasing-Purchase Order-Set up Stock Transport Order-Assign Delivery Type and Checking Rule
    Delivery type NL has been assigned to document type UB.
    The details of customer master 56 & 57 are as below
    Account Group - Sold To Party
    Reconcilliation account -121000
    Delivery plant 1000 & 2000 respectively
    Please note - No vendor number is maintained in these cusomer masters.
    Created these plants as vendors
    Account group 0007(Plants) and assigned plant numbers in the  additional data of purchasing.
    Material 251 is created and maintained in both the sales orgnization.
    Now when I am creating the STO for transferring goods from plant 2000 to 1000, I am getting error message.
    "Not possible to determine shipping data for material 251"
    Am I missing something? Some documentation say that I should create a receiving plant as customer in the sales area of supplying plant. If this is true, how to do it?
    Also, what is the significance of return vendor (maintaining vendor master in the customer) in this case?
    Your any clue will be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Shekhar

    Shekhar,
    Customer must be maintained as a shipto as well.  
    In your STO config settings you don't need a customer assigned to the source plant, unless it will also be a destination plant (e.g. you also intend to execute STOs in the reverse direction, or from another plant).
    While looking at your customer (shipto), you will also want to look at Route Determination for this customer.  Typically, your route will be defined by customer zone (from cust master), shipping point zone (from shipping point definition configuration), and shipping conditions (customer master).  Route will be used during delivery creation to schedule the delivery.  Logically, the total duration between Material Availability date to Delivery date of the delivery (picking/packing/load/transit) should be something close to the planned delivery time in the Material Master, in order to maintain consistency throughout the entire planning and execution process.
    Don't forget to maintain your STO Purchase req stuff IMG>MM>Purch>PurReq>Set up Stock Transport Requisition.
    Rgds,
    DB49

  • Error creating work order for new notification - Related SyncBO not present

    Hi,
    We are working with MAM3.0 standard application.
    We age getting an  error while creating work order for a NEW notification.
    In this scenario both notification and corresponding work order are also not created.
    Here is the error for MAM30001 Sync BO in MEREP_MONI:_
    Reading inbox record (mobile ID=0000001444, seq, no.=29, rcd_cntr=1, data=TOP0001000000
    External format successfully converted to internal format: ldata=TOP0001000000000000000
    Related SyncBO MAM30_010 with Sync key 0000000028 is not present on the device.
    Return code 1 (DOWNLOADER)                                                   
       Here is the error for MAM30010 Sync BO in MEREP_MONI:_
    Return code from RFC BAPI Wrapper call:Order NEW does not exist
    Return code from RFC BAPI Wrapper call:The order/network type  is not defined
    Return code from RFC BAPI Wrapper call:Order NEW does not exist
    Return code 0 (UPDATE MEREP_506-STATUS)                                      
    Can any body please tell me what is the sollutions for this error
    your help in this regard is appreciable.
    Regards,
    Murthy

    Hi Murthy,
    II have no idea what patch level you are on. A while back we had similar issues with some clients. There are several patches around that area available. Perhaps you should have a look into patch 959732.
    Hope that helps.
    Regards,
    Oliver

  • Stock transport order between storage locations and assignment category type E not in MRP

    Hello Gurus,
    I have a stock transport order between 2 storage location which belongs to the same plant. Besides the stock transport order is allocated to a sales order (account assigment category E). When I run the MD03, the system take into account the quantity of the stock transport order as a future entry and this is wrong. I need that the MRP has not into account the stock transport order as an entry.
    As an important information, If I modify the stock transport order removing the account asignment category E (sales order), then the MRP doesn't take into account it, so this is correct.
    Could anybody tell me how to get it?
    Thanks in advanced.

    Laura,
    It is normal that MRP will consider an STO as a receipt element; this is basic planning.  It is unclear to me why you think you do not want it to do so, but I will assume you have some logical reason.
    Contrary to what some others may have suggested, changing the scope of check for availability checking has no effect on which elements are considered for MRP.  MRP is a completely separate functionality from Availability Check.
    For Location > Location STOs (within a plant), then, you normally have the receipt element of the STO in the destination storage location, and the requirements element of an equal amount in the source storage location.  Net of these two elements is zero, unless you have already issued the STO at the source location.
    Changing the Account assignment from "E" means that the STO will not be relevant for your Sales order (in other words, when you receive this STO into the destination storage location, it cannot be used for your sales order).  In a general MTO scenario, it also means that the proceeds of this STO (the stock you received) cannot be used for ANY sales orders.
    One way that some people make an STO 'not relevant' for MRP is to alter the destination storage location such that it is not relevant for MRP.  You can change the MRP relevancy of the storage location in MM02 > MRP4 tab
    Best Regards,
    DB49

  • Stock Transport Order (STO)will not create delivery

    I have created a intercompany Stock Transport Order (STO) and it has created the shipping tab in the Purchase order(PO), and all seems to be correct.
    I have material in the plant, yet when I go to create the delivery using VL10G, the PO does not show as a choice. I also do not get an error, so I cannot tell why it is not creating the delivery.
    Is there a way to see an anaylis of why the STO is not showing as a choice?
    Thanks,

    Hi,
    Please check the delivery date in the STO created.and adjust the del creation date etc input fields at VL10G and try the posting.If there exists no error in the po created.

  • Purchase Order item text not present in accounting documents after MIGO

    Hello all,
    in ECC 5.0 I create a PO using ME21N. Afterwards the GR is done with MIGO.
    For the moment the PO item text is not transferred to the FI documents. The field BESEG-SGTXT is empty. Is there a possibility to copy the text during GR from the PO item to SGTXT?
    In fact I am looking for a customizing path and not a User Exit.
    Thanks and regards
    AD

    Hi,
    You can fill the field header text on the 'Details' tab
    (This is field INVFO-BKTXT) and this field will be copied into
    the FI document fields BSEG-SGTXT for the vendor line and BKPF-BKTXT.
    You can fill directly the field SGTXT for the account lines ( if you
    post directly to an account) and for the purchase order lines."
    Also please review attached notes.
    453027     MIRO: Segment text for vendor line
    366412     MIRO: Enhancement LMR1M004 item text
    MIRO and the FI Enjoy transactions were designed seperately to meet the
    needs of their respective components - FI and MM. As they were not
    designed in conjunction, there are differences in their functionality.
    Not all information in one component will be updated in the other.
    Best Regards,
    Arminda
    Please also review attached note 42615 as this explains how settings
    in transaction ob14/ob41 effect the field INVFO-SGTXT in Miro.

  • Stock Transport Order - Partners not Determined

    Hi Colleagues,
    We have a simple Intra company Stock Transport Order and want to get the partner function 'VN' into the purchase order and then into the Inbound Delivery
    We have configured the partner schemas and assigned to the vendor account group 0007. Partners are created in the plant vendor record
    We have configured the purchase document schema and assigned this to document type 'UB'. However, the partners are not defaulted into the STO. We can assign them manually
    However, when we create the Inbound Delivery for the STO the vendor is not defaulted into the delivery and gives an incompletion error. We can manually enter vendor in the inbound delivery and then save the document.
    Any Ideas what is wrong or missing?
    Thanks
    Steve

    have a look into OSS note 863541 - Standard vendor for inbound delivery w/ purchase order refer

  • I want to order files (e.g., photos) in a particular order (not necessarily an order that is an option in MacOS. Ie, my own custom order, and I want them STAY in that order until I change the order. Is this possible?

    I want to order files (e.g., photos) in a particular order (not necessarily an order that is an option in MacOS. Ie, my own custom order, and I want them STAY in that order until I change the order. Is this possible?

    Custom sort order is not a typical option in the list view of any desktop computing systems I know of. The way you're seeing it work is also how it works in Windows and other systems.
    There is no "None" sort order. What you're seeing is a "None" option under "Arrange By." Arranging is not the same as sorting; arranging is how the files are grouped in the window. For example, you can arrange (group) files by Kind while sorting by Name. You'll notice that if you are in List view and you choose Arrange By "None," in the window there is still a sort triangle next to the column name that it's sorting by.
    If Arrange is set to None, the files appear in one big group (the traditional view) that is controlled by the Sort order (where there is no None option).
    I didn't even know the difference between Sort and Arrange until I saw your question and did a little research! This Macworld article helped:
    How to arrange and sort files in Lion Finder (also applies to later OSs like Mavericks)
    As for your main question, how to do a custom sort order in the Finder, you can only rearrange files manually in Icon view. As with other operating systems, if you want to create a custom sort order for photos there are other ways:
    Use a photo organizer application like iPhoto or Lightroom. Some let you have custom sort orders in folders, but others only let you have a custom sort inside a different container like an "album" or "collection". Having those additional container types is part of why photos are often best managed in an organizer application and not on the desktop.
    Rename the files. You can use a renaming utility program to rename the photos with numbers that will enforce your sort order when sorted by name on the desktop, like
    01 Photo.jpg
    01 Photo.jpg
    01 Photo.jpg
    or
    Photo 01.jpg
    Photo 02.jpg
    Photo 03.jpg

  • Lightroom Mobile does not recognise my custom sort order

    I cannot find a way to get the Lightroom Mobile app on my iPad to recognise the custom sort order set up for the collection on my desktop. I am on the current versions of both Lightroom and Lightroom Mobile. The only sort option that appears in LR mobile is by capture time. The custom sort order is available as an option for the collection on the Abobe website but not on the mobile app.

    You can change the sort type when you touch the Capture Type-label. So tab on the "Capture Time"-label and you will see the other sort options like "Modified Date", "Custom Order" etc.
    Hope that helps.
    -guido

  • Released transport not present in QA Worklist

    Hello,
    We have a transport that is "stuck" betwen our DEV and QAS system. The transport has been released, and it is visible in the QAS system import queue in status "waiting for QA approval", but it is not present in the QA Worklist, and cannot be approved. That makes it impossible for us to transport it furhter.
    Has anyone come accrosss a similar problem (and solved it)?
    Thanks,
    A.

    Hi
    First check whether that request has been created as "Local Change request"...if that is the case you cant see the request in import queue of QAS or PRD.
    Secondly, if the request has a target system ( check from SE01 in DEV system), check if you have datafiles and cofiles for that request  in usr/sap/trans/data urs/sap/trans/cofiles directory from Operating system level
    If everything is fine, try to forward the request from DEV system import queue or add the request in the import queue of QAS system manually

Maybe you are looking for