Use global temp table for DML error logging

our database is 11.2.0.4 enterprise edition on solaris 10
we are wondering if anyone has an opinion of or has done this before, to use a global temp table for DML error logging. We have a fairly busy transactional database with 2 hot tables for inserts. The regular error table created with dbms_errlog has caused many deadlocks which we don't quite understand yet. we have thought using global temp table for the purpose, and that seemed to work, but we can't read error from the GTT, the table is empty even reading from the same session as inserts. Does anyone have an idea why?
Thanks

The insert into the error logging table is done with a recursive transaction therefore it's private from your session which is doing the actual insert.
Adapted from http://oracle-base.com/articles/10g/dml-error-logging-10gr2.php
INSERT INTO dest
SELECT *
FROM  source
LOG ERRORS INTO err$_dest ('INSERT') REJECT LIMIT UNLIMITED;
99,998 rows inserted.
select count(*) from dest;
  COUNT(*)
    99998
SELECT *
FROM  err$_dest
WHERE  ora_err_tag$ = 'INSERT';
1400    "ORA-01400: cannot insert NULL into ("E668983_DBA"."DEST"."CODE")"        I    INSERT    1000        Description for 1000
1400    "ORA-01400: cannot insert NULL into ("E668983_DBA"."DEST"."CODE")"        I    INSERT    10000        Description for 10000
1400    "ORA-01400: cannot insert NULL into ("E668983_DBA"."DEST"."CODE")"        I    INSERT    1000        Description for 1000
1400    "ORA-01400: cannot insert NULL into ("E668983_DBA"."DEST"."CODE")"        I    INSERT    10000        Description for 10000
rollback;
select count(*) from dest;
  COUNT(*)
        0
SELECT *
FROM  err$_dest
WHERE  ora_err_tag$ = 'INSERT';
1400    "ORA-01400: cannot insert NULL into ("E668983_DBA"."DEST"."CODE")"        I    INSERT    1000        Description for 1000
1400    "ORA-01400: cannot insert NULL into ("E668983_DBA"."DEST"."CODE")"        I    INSERT    10000        Description for 10000
1400    "ORA-01400: cannot insert NULL into ("E668983_DBA"."DEST"."CODE")"        I    INSERT    1000        Description for 1000
1400    "ORA-01400: cannot insert NULL into ("E668983_DBA"."DEST"."CODE")"        I    INSERT    10000        Description for 10000

Similar Messages

  • Global temp tables for GeoRaster mosaicing

    Hi,
    Although this question involves the GeoRaster capability contained in the Spatial package, it has more to do with global temp tables, so it's in this forum group.
    The mosaicing function requires all the individual images (there is an image in each record) to be in their own table before they can be mosaiced, as there is no way to stipulate only certain images in a table should be used.
    So the best idea I've had so far is to use a global temp table where the images I need can be selected and put in the temp table - then mosaiced. It is important that the temp table contain only the images needed for a given mosaic. However, I will be doing the mosaic operation many times in a given session (possibly even more than 1 mosaic at the same time) and am worried that there will be old or unrelated records in the temp table.
    Does this mean I have to make a new session every time I need to mosaic an image? This doesn't sound very efficient. Can I have just one session but have a "new" temp table each time?
    Thanks,
    MH

    I have very limited experience with Spatial, and have never done anything like a mosaic
    But regarding Global Temp... If you want to make sure the GTT is empty every time, just end your transaction (commit or rollback). This will remove all data from the GTT (if you had it made with ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS - the default)

  • Use Global Temp Table to overcome Mutating Trigger issue

    Hello all. I need to delete a line in a table, and thought I would get around the mutating trigger issue by creating a GTB table. I created 2 different triggers. One is a Row level trigger, the other a Statement level trigger.
    The first trigger gathers the information I need to identify the line I want to delete. This is:
    CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER Requisition_Capture
    AFTER UPDATE OF Delivery_Code on Supply_Items
    FOR EACH ROW
    BEGIN
      IF :NEW.Delivery_Code = '#' THEN
        INSERT INTO Requisition_Storage
          (Req_Code)
        VALUES
          (:NEW.Requisition_Code);
      END IF;
    END;And the second trigger deletes the line:
    CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER SUPPLY_ITEM_RESET
    AFTER INSERT ON Requisition_Storage
    DECLARE
    BEGIN
      DELETE FROM Supply_Items r
       WHERE r.Requisition_Code =
             (SELECT t.Req_Code
                FROM Requisition_Storage t, Supply_Items s
               WHERE t.Req_Code = s.Requisition_Code)
         AND r.Order_Qty = 0;
    END;The GTB is as follows stores the information I need to delete the line.:
    -- Create table
    create global temporary table REQUISITION_STORAGE
      req_code VARCHAR2(20)
    on commit delete rows;When the column Delivery_Code is updated in the Supply_Item table, and the value is reset to '#', I want to capture the Requisition_Code in the GTB, so I can run the statement level trigger and delete the reset row. However, I still have a mutating error problem. What am I missing?

    The statement level trigger would need to be an AFTER UPDATE OF Supply_Items for this to work around the mutating trigger issue. You need to ensure that your UPDATE has finished updating all the rows that it is going to update before your statement-level trigger runs.
    As has been pointed out, however, the desire to work around a mutating trigger error almost always indicates that you have a data model problem. And you're almost always better served by fixing the data model than working around the error.
    Justin

  • Global Temp Table Not found - SSIS

    I am facing below error while using global temp table in SSIS.
    [OLE DB Destination [78]] Error: SSIS Error Code DTS_E_OLEDBERROR.  An OLE DB error has occurred. Error code: 0x80040E37.
    An OLE DB record is available.  Source: "Microsoft SQL Server Native Client 10.0"  Hresult: 0x80040E37  Description: "Table/view either does not exist or contains errors.".
    [OLE DB Destination [78]] Error: Failed to open a fastload rowset for " ##AGENTDTLS". Check that the object exists in the database.
    [SSIS.Pipeline] Error: component "OLE DB Destination" (78) failed the pre-execute phase and returned error code 0xC0202040.
    1) For data connection manager - Retain same connection is set to True
    2) Data Flow task - Delay Validation is set to True
    3) Destination Task - Using Temp Table - ValidateExternalMetadata is set to false.
    4) I am just using one data connection.
    5) before using the temp file I am checking if its exits and if yes drp it first and create it.
    Not able to understand the reason for failure.

    Why don't you use permanent table in tempdb?
    Kalman Toth Database & OLAP Architect
    SQL Server 2014 Design & Programming
    New Book / Kindle: Exam 70-461 Bootcamp: Querying Microsoft SQL Server 2012

  • Owb11gr2 dml error logging

    Hi all,
    I was trying to make use of the error tables for dml errors based on data rules defined for a table in owb11gr2. I saw that for a table operator in my mapping, there is this "DML Error Table Name" and "Error Table Name" property. What is the difference between these two?

    According to Oracle "Data Modeling, ETL, and Data Quality Guide"
    Error Table Name :-
    Represents the name of the error table that stores logical errors
    caused by enforcing data profiling and orphan management.
    DML Error Table Name :-
    Use the DML Error Table Name property to log DML errors for a particular data
    object.
    Cheers
    Nawneet

  • DML Error logging with delete restrict

    Hi,
    I am trying to log all DML errors while performing ETL process. We encountered a problem in the process when one of the on delete cascade is missing in child tables but I was curious to know why we got that exception to the calling environment because we are logging all DML errors in err$_ tables. Our expectation is when we get child record found violation then that error will be logged into ERR$_ tables and process will carry on without any interruption but it interrupted in the middle and terminated. I can illustrate with below example
    T1 -> T2 -> T3
    T1 is parent and it is s root
    Create table t1 (id number primary key, id2 number);
    Create table t2(id number references t1(id) on delete cascade, id2 number);
    create table t3 (id number references t2(id)); -- Missing on delete cascade
    insert into t1 as select level, level from dual connect by level < 20;
    insert into t2 as select level, level from dual connect by level < 20;
    insert into t3 as select level from dual connect by level < 20;
    exec dbms_errlog(t1);
    exec dbms_errlog(t2);
    exec dbms_errlog(t3);
    delete from t1 where id = 1 log errors into err$_t1 reject limit unlimited;   -- Child record found violation due to t3 raised but I am expecting this error will be trapped in log tables.
    delete from t2 where id =1 log errors into err$_t2 reject limit unlimited; -- Got the same error child record violation. My expectation error will be logged into log tables.
    I am using Oracle 11gR2.
    Also, Please let me know if there is any restrictions to use DML error logging in DBMS_PARALLEL_EXECUTE.
    Please advise
    Thanks,
    Umakanth

    What is the error you want me to fix? Missing on delete cascade?
    The Code you posted has multiple syntax errors and can't possibly run. You should post code that actually works.
    My expectation is all the DML errors will be logged into error logging tables even if it is child record found violation.
    delete from t1 where id = 1 log errors into err$_t1 reject limit unlimited;  -- Child record found violation due to t3 raised but I am expecting this error will be trapped in log tables.
    delete from t2 where id =1 log errors into err$_t2 reject limit unlimited; -- Got the same error child record violation. My expectation error will be logged into log tables.
    DML error logging logs DATA. When you delete from T1 there is an error because the T2 child record can NOT be deleted. So the T1 row that was being deleted is logged into the T1 error log table. The request was to delete a T1 row so that is the only request that failed; the child rows in T2 and T3 will not be put into log tables.
    Same when you try to delete from T2. The T3 child record can NOT be deleted so the T2 row that was being deleted is logged into the T2 error log table.
    The exceptions that occur are NOT logged, only the data that the DML could not be performed on.
    After I fixed your code your example worked fine for me and logged into the DML error tables as expected. But I wasn't doing it from a client.

  • Update Global Temp Table in Oracle 11g

    Hi Experts,
    Scenario: I have stored  procedure A which calls procedure B. Procedure B uses Global temp Tables(With On Commit Preserve Rows)  to work with the data.
    I am trying to update one of the GTT in Proc B but unable to do it .. via SQL or via PL/SQL Cursor/Collection. There is no syntax nor logical error and the PL/SQL proc completes execution successfully but the rows are not getting updated. My Db version is Oralce 11g 11203.
    Update statement is something like this.
    Update <GTT>
    SET amount1 = amount1 *-1, amount2 = amount2 *-1
    where field1 = <value>
    and field2 in ( Select filed2 from <table1> );
    Any idea why would this update not work? Has anyone faced this issue in Oracle 11g??
    Appreciate your suggestions & thanks in Advance for your inputs.
    Cheers,
    MS

    Update statement is something like this.
    Update <GTT>
    SET amount1 = amount1 *-1, amount2 = amount2 *-1
    where field1 = <value>
    and field2 in ( Select filed2 from <table1> );
    Any idea why would this update not work?
    You already told us that it DOES work - no errors or exceptions.
    It is trivial to determine if that update will do anything - just turn it into a SELECT and see if any rows are ntselected:
    v_cnt INTEGER;
    SELECT COUNT(*) INTO v_cnt FROM  myGTT
    WHERE field1 = <value>
    AND field2 in (Select field2 from <tablee1>);
    Then take a look at the 'count' that you get.

  • Global Temp tables in standy-by db

    Hi All,
    Can i use Global temp tables in a stand by database?
    The temp tables will be used for dml purpose.
    oracle version is 10g R2
    RHEL 5
    Thanks,
    Ajay Kumar

    Physical standby :
    No DMLs are allowed on the standby database and the most important things is that Standby databases can always be opened in READ-ONLY mode which won't allow DMLs.
    Logical standby :
    Logical standby database may have different structure from primary database. When it is in read-only mode SQL statements generated from redo are applied and queries may be run concurrently. When in read-write mode one can modify data in tables created in addition to primary schema. But this setting may be over written by specifying additional security options.
    http://oracleonline.info/standby_database_type.html
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10500_01/server.920/a96653/manage_ls.htm
    Thanks

  • Inserting data in global temp table?

    Hello experts,
    i have a form having base table master and detail. i can insert upadate the records.
    requirement: creating the global temp table for same form. sothat data save only form session.
    for this i created 2 global temp table having same structure required for same form.
    i changes the property for block as base table to global temp table.
    now i am trying to save the records but not going in the temp table. as i changes the block base table property to temp tables
    as well as advance data block properties also .
    please tell me the reason? where can be the problem.
    thanks yash
    Edited by: yash_08031983 on Apr 16, 2012 1:27 AM

    i am trying to save the records but not going in the temp table.How do you check that? You cannot go to sqlplus and check if there are any records in the GTT. Data in a GTT is only visible in the current session (= only in the form).
    What is the use of a GTT here? What are you trying to achieve?

  • Global temp table and edit

    Hi all,
    Can someone tell me why when I create a GTT and insert the data like the followijng ,I get insert 14 rows msg. But when I do a select statement from sqlwork shop , sometimes i get the data sometimes I don't. my understanding is this data is supposed to stay during my logon session then got cleaned out when I exit session.
    I am developing a screen in apex and will use this temp table for user to do some editing work. Once ithe editing is done then I save the data into a static table. Can this be done ? So far my every attempt to update the temp table always result to 0 rows updated and the temp table reversed back to 0 rows. CAn you help me ?
    CREATE GLOBAL TEMPORARY TABLE "EMP_SESSION"
    (     "EMPNO" NUMBER NOT NULL ENABLE,
         "ENAME" VARCHAR2(10),
         "JOB" VARCHAR2(9),
         "MGR" NUMBER,
         "HIREDATE" DATE,
         "SAL" NUMBER,
         "COMM" NUMBER,
         "DEPTNO" NUMBER
    ) ON COMMIT PRESERVE ROWS
    insert into emp_session( EMPNO, ENAME, JOB, MGR, HIREDATE, SAL, COMM, DEPTNO)
    select * from emp
    select * from emp_session
    -- sometimes I get 14 rows, sometimes 0 rows
    Thanks.
    Tai

    Tai,
    To say that Apex doesn't support GTT's is not quite correct. In order to understand why it is not working for you and how they may be of use in an Apex application, you have to understand the concept of a session in Apex as opposed to a conventional database session.
    In a conventional database session, as when you are connected with sqlplus then you have what is known as a dedicated session, or a synchronous connection. Temporary objects such as GTTs and packaged variables can persist across calls to the database. A session in Apex however is asynchronous by nature and a connection to the database is done through some sort of a server such as the Oracle HTTP server or the Apex Listener, which in effect maintains a pool of connections to the database and calls by your application aren't guaranteed to get the same connection for each call.
    To get over this, the guys who developed Apex came up with various methods to maintain session state and global objects that are persistent within the context of an Apex session. One of these is Apex collections, which are a device for maintaining collection like (array like) data that is persistent within an Apex session. These are Apex session specific objects in that they are local to the session that creates and maintains them.
    With this knowledge, you can then see why the GTT is not working for you and also how a GTT may be of use in an Apex application, provided you don't expect the data to persist across a call, as in a PL/SQL procedure. You should note though, that unless you are dealing with very large datasets, then a regular Oracle collection is preferable.
    I hope this explains your issue.
    Regards
    Andre

  • Global Temp Tables

    Has anyone had any luck using global temp tables within DI?  I am tryng to create a process that will populate a global tmp table in one data flow and then read from that global tmp table in the next data flow within the same work flow.  A template table won't work for my needs as I also need to be able to do a lookup_ext... is null from this table as well.
    There is a risk in using a physical temp table as this process will be ran many times through out the day with various values.
    Thanks,
    Alicia

    Within Oracle one can create a Global Temporary Table which is a database object; however, it clears it's contents when the session is released.  It is useful when creating reusable routines as multiple processes can write different information to the table and the table maintains the information for the life of the SQL session.  For instance one can populate the table with a list of codes to be used in a SQL statement for a product and run a seperate process simutaneously populating codes for a different product.
    The probelm I am having right now is that DI seems to be closing it's SQL session before it goes to the Data Flow that needs the code list.
    Thanks,
    Alicia

  • Global Temp Table

    Hi,
    Instead of normal temporary table I am using global temporary tables for the report calculation.
    Generally we use to insert timestamp in normal temp tables to avoid inconsistency of records in multi-user environment.
    Similiary I want to get clarified whether we need to insert timestamp in global temporary tables or not ?
    Thanks in advance.

    The metadata of global temporary tables are stored in the data dictionary and can be used from every session. The data are stored in the temporary tablespace for each session. that means that every session using the global temporary table has its own set of data and can't see or modify rows of another session. the data of an global temporary table are available until the next commit | rollback by default or until the session ends "create global temporary table ...... on commit preserve rows".
    hope this helps
    corrections welcome

  • Dml error logging for tables in 10.2.0.5

    Hi experts,
    I have problems loading error records into the shadow table specified in the configuration window for tables. Upon executing the mapping, the execution results show warnings with the error records but these records were not moved to the shadow/error table.
    The actual scenario is: I specified a non-null data rule on the supplier_code column in the supplier table. Inside the mapping where I used this supplier table, I choose the option "Move to error" for this non-null data rule. Upon executing, it seems that owb treats these as warnings and not errors and thus did not propagate them to the error table. Anyone has any suggestion as to how to make use of the error tables in owb?

    DML error logging is generated for set-based PL/SQL mappings if the following conditions are satisfied:
    1. the Error table name property is set for the operator (table/view/mv)
    2. the PL/SQL Generated Mode of the module that contains the mapping is set to 10gR2 and above or Default.
    If the value is set to Default, ensure that location associated with the module has the Version set to 10.2 or above.
    When you use a data object in a mapping, the Error Table Name property for this data object is derived from the shadow table name property of the data object . If you modify the error table name of a data object (using the shadow table name property), you must synchronize all the operators bound to this data object.
    If you are still facing the issue then provide your email and I can send a simple example of data rule mapping in OWB 10.2.0.5
    Sutirtha

  • DML Error Logging for underlying tables autocreated for dimensions

    Hi,
    I have problems with logging errors during mapping for underlying tables that are automatically generated for creating dimensions. I know that DML Error Logging is supposed to work only on tables, views and materialized views, and I have tried it out using a pure table in a mapping without any reference to a dimension and specifying the error table name for it. This works perfectly. The error rows were captured correctly in the error table and the correct rows were also loaded successfully to the target table.
    However when it comes to mapping to a dimension, I have some issues with that. I specified the shadowtable name for the underlying table(right clicking on the table in design center and then choosing configure), and after deploying I did check that the error table/shadow table and also the target table were indeed created in the database.
    The problem lies now in the mapping because I am actually mapping to a dimension and not the underlying table the dimension references to. It seems that the mapping did not manage to capture details of the error table for the underlying table that the dimension was referencing to and thus were unable to capture the errors. Only the corrected rows get loaded and there were no error messages during the loading that suggests that the incorrect rows were detected.
    Would appreciate some assistance here.
    Thanks!
    WY

    Hi
    The DML error logging feature in 10gR2 and 11gR1 was restricted purely to tables, so the dimension operator did not support it. This is now supported in OWB 11gR2 (plus there is the orphan management functionality).
    Cheers
    David

  • Error while creating Global temp table

    Hi,
    I am very new to PL/SQL so please excuse my question. I have the below query . I have to get a count between the source table and various target tables. I am creating a global temp table to store the counts. I am getting the below error for my following query :
    Thanks for the help,
    Petronas
    ----Query----
    set serveroutput on
    Declare
    nm1 varchar2(200);
    nm2 varchar2(200);
    cnt1 number;
    cnt2 number;
    diff number;
    totdiff number;
    Begin
    nm1 := null;
    nm2:= null;
    cnt1:= 0;
    cnt2 := 0;
    diff := 0;
    totdiff := 0;
    create GLOBAL TEMPORARY TABLE diff ( name1 varchar(200), name2 varchar2(200), diff number);
    select count(*) into cnt1
    from users_staging;
    select count(*) into cnt2
    from PROD.users;
    nm1 := 'users_staging';
    nm2 := 'PROD.users';
    diff := cnt1 - cnt2;
    insert into diff values (nm1,nm2,diff);
    select count(*) into totdiff
    from diff
    where diff> 0 ;
    dbms_output.enable(10000);
    dbms_output.put_line('# of tables where difference is > 0 ' ||totdiff);
    end;
    Encountered the symbol "CREATE" when expecting one of the following:
    begin case declare end exception exit for goto if loop mod
    null pragma raise return select update while with
    <an identifier> <a double-quoted delimited-identifier>
    <a bind variable> << close current delete fetch lock insert
    open rollback savepoint set sql execute commit forall merge
    pipe

    Hi,
    "CREATE GLOBAL TEPORARY TABLE ..." is not a PL/SQL command; it is a SQL command only.
    Create the table, using that statement, before running the PL/SQL block.
    You can issue SQL statements from within PL/SQL using the EXECUTE IMMEDIATE command, but this is rarely a good idea.
    I assume the PL/SQL code is meant to create the table and then populate it.
    You should split those into two separate pieces of code. You'll only want to create the table once, no matter how many times you use it. I assume you'll want to populate it the same way many times. Remember, the "TEMPORARY" in "GLOBAL TEMPORARY TABLE" refers to the data, not the table. When you end a transaction (or a session, depending on whther you want "ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS" or "ON COMMIT PRESERVE ROWS"), the data disappears, but the now-empty stays, ready to be populated for the next transaction (or session).
    Edited by: Frank Kulash on Aug 4, 2010 2:25 PM

Maybe you are looking for

  • Open Items Table

    hi experts Table name for Open Items data. Thanks Keshavp. Search SDN

  • Re-using Segments Created via API or Re-creating Every Time?

    Hi All, Wanted to get your thoughts on this... We have been able to create Segments via the API, however, which way to go: OPTION 1: Re-use Segment if there are no additions or deletions (changes) to the list? or OPTION 2: Re-create the Segment every

  • Can't get Sub-forms to Display in Right order

    Hello there I have a strange issue with the positioning of a series of sub-forms using Designer 8.2.1.3144. I have the following (schematic) structure (Top Level Sub-form) Sub-form 1 Label 1.1 Label 1.2 Sub-form 2 Sub-form 2.1 Test 2.1.1 Label 2.1.2

  • Trouble  opening a file in Organizer

    In attempting to open a file I recieved the notice "Searching for missing file" accompanied by a square red icon one the base of the (blurred) file. This applied to many files. I followed the insructions from Adobe Help Centre, under the heading "Rec

  • Elements 9 isn't processing correctly

    After post-processing an image in the Editor it shows up back in the Organizer only as a blank white box with a small broken box icon in the center of it. How can I get my image back?