'User defined exception error in package OE_SCHEDULE_UTIL' in Sales Order

Dear Contributors,
I am getting the following error while trying to enter line items in the Sales order form. Please provide your valuable suggestion on how to fix this...
User defined exception error in package OE_SCHEDULE_UTIL Procedure Insert_Into_Mtl_Sales_Orders

1004661 wrote:
Dear Contributors,
I am getting the following error while trying to enter line items in the Sales order form. Please provide your valuable suggestion on how to fix this...
User defined exception error in package OE_SCHEDULE_UTIL Procedure Insert_Into_Mtl_Sales_Orders
Please see (ORA-01006 bind variable does not exist FND_FLEX_SERVER during OM Activity [ID 1067359.1]).
Thanks,
Hussein

Similar Messages

  • User-Defined Exception in Package OE_SCHEDULE_UTIL Procedure Load_Results_f

    Hi Expert,
    While running the Order Import i am getting the error please help us :
    Order Import Concurrent Program
    Concurrent Program Parameters
    Validate Only: N
    Order Source:
    Order Ref:
    Sold To Org Id:
    Sold To Org:
    Change Sequence:
    Performance Parameter: Y
    Trim Blanks: N
    Operation:
    Number of Instances: 0
    Debug Level: 0
    Request Id: 4471
    Org Id: 2453
    Failed to perform Action Request BOOK_ORDER
    Failed to perform Action Request BOOK_ORDER
    No. of orders found: 1
    No. of orders imported: 0
    No. of orders failed: 1
    Source/Order/Seq/Line Message
    10/1046001534//2 ATP Process resulted in no data
    10/1046001534//2 User-Defined Exception in Package OE_SCHEDULE_UTIL Procedure Load_Results_from_tbl
    10/1046001534//2 User-Defined Exception in Package OE_SCHEDULE_UTIL Procedure Load_Results_from_rec
    End of Order Import Concurrent Program
    Regards,
    Suraj

    And also check
    Order Import error : User-Defined Exception in Package OE_SCHEDULE_UTIL Procedure Action_Undemand,User-Defined Exception in Package OE_SCHEDULE_UTIL Procedure Action_Reschedule [ID 737031.1]

  • Error : ORA-06510: PL/SQL: unhandled user-defined exception

    Hi,
    Please help on this Error.
    Here is my code for Trigger
    Code for Trigger
    CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER TRG_EXCEP AFTER INSERT ON TEST FOR EACH ROW
    DECLARE
         vInt NUMBER := 0;
         vErr EXCEPTION;
    BEGIN
         vInt := :OLD.TEST_ID;
         IF vInt > 10 THEN
              INSERT INTO TEST1 VALUES (:NEW.TEST_ID,:NEW.TEST_NAME);
         ELSE
              RAISE vErr;
         END IF;
    EXCEPTION
              WHEN vErr THEN
                   INSERT INTO TEST1 VALUES (0,:NEW.TEST_NAME);
    END;
    While inserting in to the table TEST iam getting the following error
    Error on line 0
    INSERT INTO TEST VALUES (147541,'Mm',SYSDATE)
    ORA-00001: unique constraint (DB_TEST.SYS_C005327) violated
    ORA-06512: at "DB_TEST.TRG_EXCEP", line 13
    ORA-06510: PL/SQL: unhandled user-defined exception
    Someone help me please ...............
    Thanks,
    Murali.V

    Hi,
    I made the mistake here
    INSERT INTO TEST1(id,name) VALUES (0,:NEW.TEST_NAME);
    where i defined the id as primary key.
    But the another problem for me now is while compiling the trigger after i modified,
    i get this error
    11:37:05 Error: TRIGGER DB_TEST.TRG_EXCEP
    On line: 7
    PLS-00553: character set name is not recognized
    Please help.
    Thanks,
    Murali.V

  • Validation returns : no data found + unhandled user-defined exception

    Hi, I'm working with Application Express 4.1.1.00.23.
    I have an application for timesheet management.
    On one page, I've got a report (not interactive) in which you can enter the hours you've worked. First you add a free line, choose the task and then enter the hours you've spent.
    You can only have one empty line at a time. If you try to add a line when you already have an empty line, a validation will display an error. It worked fine in version 3.2. Now we upgraded to 4.1 and get a weird error :
    1) The validation msg appears fine
    2) The report appears fine
    3) There is a msg at the end of the report saying :
    report error:
    ORA-01403: no data found
    ORA-06510: PL/SQL: unhandled user-defined exception
    Could somebody point out the source of this problem ?
    Thank you!
    Here is the debug :
    0.31117     0.00204     parse query as: FEUILLES_DE_TEMPS     4     
    0.31319     0.07865     ...Execute Statement: select NULL "CHECK$01", NULL "nom_projet2", NULL "NO_TACHE_ENTRE", NULL "NO_TACHE", NULL "NO_SEMAINE_EMPLOYE", NULL "NOM_TACHE", NULL "Tâches", NULL "SEQUENCE", NULL "Heures dim", NULL "DIM", NULL "Heures lun", NULL "LUN", NULL "Heures mar", NULL "MAR", NULL "Heures mer", NULL "MER", NULL "Heures jeu", NULL "JEU", NULL "Heures ven", NULL "VEN", NULL "Heures sam", .........
    0.39191     0.00158     print column headings     4
    0.39342     0.02546     rows loop: 500 row(s)     4
    0.41889     0.00087     report error: ORA-01403: no data found ORA-06510: PL/SQL: unhandled user-defined exception
    .....

    Hi, thanks for your answer. Here is the validation we are executing. I'm pretty sure its fine since count(*) always return a value (plus we see V2 in the debug...) :
    declare
    l_count number;
    begin
    apex_debug_message.enable_debug_messages(7);
    apex_debug_message.log_message('-----------------------------------V1----------------------------------');
    -- get remaining empty tasks count
    SELECT count(*) into l_count
    FROM VIEW_TACHE_SYSTEME
    WHERE NO_TACHE NOT IN (SELECT DISTINCT NO_TACHE FROM TACHE_JOUR WHERE NO_SEMAINE_EMPLOYE = :P36_NO_SEMAINE_EMPLOYE);
    apex_debug_message.log_message('-----------------------------------V2----------------------------------');
    apex_debug_message.log_message(l_count);
    if l_count = 0 then
    return 'Veuillez utiliser la tâche vide avant d''ajouter une ligne.';
    else
    return null;
    end if;
    end;
    Here is the debug :
    0.14643     0.00318     ...Validation "ADD_ROW_VALIDATION" - Type: FUNC_BODY_RETURNING_ERR_TEXT     4     
    0.14961     0.00318     ...Execute Statement: declare function x return varchar2 is begin declare l_count number; begin apex_debug_message.enable_debug_messages(7); apex_debug_message.log_message('-----------------------------------V1----------------------------------'); -- get remaining empty tasks count SELECT count(*) into l_count FROM VIEW_TACHE_SYSTEME WHERE NO_TACHE NOT IN (SELECT DISTINCT NO_TACHE FROM TACHE_JOUR WHERE NO_SEMAINE_EMPLOYE = :P36_NO_SEMAINE_EMPLOYE); apex_debug_message.log_message('-----------------------------------V2----------------------------------'); apex_debug_message.log_message(l_count); if l_count = 0 then return 'Veuillez utiliser la tâche vide avant d''ajouter une ligne.'; else return null; end if; end; return null; end; begin wwv_flow.g_computation_result_vc := x; end;     4     
    0.15280     0.01299     -----------------------------------V1----------------------------------     6     
    0.16578     0.00310     -----------------------------------V2----------------------------------     6     
    0.16888     0.00235     0     6     
    0.17123     0.00225     ......Result = Veuillez utiliser la tâche vide avant d'ajouter une ligne.     4     
    0.17347     0.00276     ......Did NOT pass     4     
    0.17624     0.00314     Add error onto error stack     4     
    0.17938     0.00343     ...Error data:     4     
    0.18280     0.00327     ......message: Veuillez utiliser la tâche vide avant d'ajouter une ligne.     4     
    0.18607     0.00446     ......display_location: INLINE_IN_NOTIFICATION     4     
    0.19053     0.00323     ......is_internal_error: false     4     
    0.19375     0.00323     ......error_backtrace: - PL/SQL Call Stack - object line object handle number name c000000382130f30 717 package body APEX_040100.WWV_FLOW_ERROR c000000382130f30 833 package body APEX_040100.WWV_FLOW_ERROR c00000039da9b5c8 154 package body APEX_040100.WWV_FLOW_VALIDATION c00000039da9b5c8 363 package body APEX_040100.WWV_FLOW_VALIDATION c00000039da9b5c8 784 package body APEX_040100.WWV_FLOW_VALIDATION c00000039da9b5c8 905 package body APEX_040100.WWV_FLOW_VALIDATION c00000039d1142c8 10005 package body APEX_040100.WWV_FLOW c000000381287050 31 anonymous block

  • PL/SQL Using SQL%NOTFOUND to raise a user defined exception in a function

    I have written the following function for finding the number of items in stock in the item table.
    CREATE OR REPLACE function getAmount (ItemID IN NUMBER)
    RETURN NUMBER
    AS
    invalid_id EXCEPTION;
    returnedQty number;
    BEGIN
    Select qty
    Into returnedQty
    From item
    Where itemNo = ItemID;
    RETURN (returnedQty);
    IF SQL%NOTFOUND THEN
    RAISE invalid_id;
    END IF;
    COMMIT;
    Exception
    WHEN invalid_id THEN
    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Invalid ID entered');
    END getAmount;
    The function compiles successfully, although there is a problem that Oracle is not handling my user-defined exception invalid_id
    If I use the following for a valid itemID:
    DECLARE
    return_value number;
    BEGIN
    return_value := getAmount(1);
    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE (return_value);
    END;
    then the function returns the quantity of items in stock correctly.
    However, if I enter an incorrect itemID, say 20
    DECLARE
    return_value number;
    BEGIN
    return_value := getAmount(20);
    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE (return_value);
    END;
    The invalid_id exception is not raised, and the Oracle errors says: no_data_found and the function has not returned a value. If I add a no_data_found exception, this works perfectly, but for this assignment I must write my own user-defined error.
    Any help would be very much appreciated!
    Thank you.

    What you're trying to do, is to use an implicit cursor. Implicit cursors will raise no_data_found and too_many_rows in case of an error. Explicit cursors will not.
    Also, you have a small coding error ... a little rewrite and your code will do as you want to:
    CREATE OR REPLACE function getAmount (ItemID IN NUMBER)
    RETURN NUMBER
    AS
    invalid_id EXCEPTION;
    returnedQty number;
    cursor citem is
    Select qty
    From item
    Where itemNo = ItemID;
    fnd boolean;
    BEGIN
    open citem;
    fetch citem Into returnedQty;
    fnd := citem%found;
    close citem;
    if fnd then
    RETURN (returnedQty);
    else
    RAISE invalid_id;
    END IF;
    /* Do not catch your own exception or the calling code will not receive it.
    Exception
    WHEN invalid_id THEN
    DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Invalid ID entered');
    END getAmount;
    Your problem is, you're not using a package. This means, that the calling code has no way of catching this user-defined exeption. The correct way is to define a package, define the userdefined exception in the package and refer to it in your code:
    create or replace package amt
    is
    invalid_id EXCEPTION;
    function getAmount (ItemID IN NUMBER)
    RETURN NUMBER;
    end;
    create or replace package body amt
    is
    function getAmount (ItemID IN NUMBER)
    RETURN NUMBER
    AS
    returnedQty number;
    cursor citem is
    Select qty
    From item
    Where itemNo = ItemID;
    fnd boolean;
    BEGIN
    open citem;
    fetch citem Into returnedQty;
    fnd := citem%found;
    close citem;
    if fnd then
    RETURN (returnedQty);
    else
    RAISE invalid_id;
    END IF;
    end;
    end; -- end package
    To do a simple test, you'll do:
    declare
    a number;
    begin
    a := amt.getAmount(123);
    dbms_output.put_line('The result is '||a);
    exception
    when amt.invalid_id then
    dbms_output.put_line('ID not found');
    end;
    Other ways is to raise the exception in your no_data_found block.
    But I'm REALLY puzzled if there's really someone out there who prefers a user-defined exception instead of the clearly defined NO_DATA_FOUND exception.
    I can't be sure of course, but are you sure what they mean is they don't want ANY exception? That's a pretty common requirement.
    In general - explicit cursors are a bit faster because Oracle does not have to do a second fetch to determine TOO_MANY_ROWS. And it's not too much additional writing. Explicit cursors will never raise exceptions - unless you use dynamic sql and your SQL is invalid.
    Good luck

  • Handle user defined exception in stored procedure

    Dear all,
    I'm using JDev 11.1.1.4.0
    In my application I'm calling the stored procedure with only in parameters using the Example 37-9 http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E17904_01/web.1111/b31974/bcadvgen.htm#ADFFD1056
    In my stored procedure I have user defined exception, like:
    create or replace procedure ...
    AS
    e_otwarty     EXCEPTION;
    //some code
      EXCEPTION
        WHEN e_otwarty THEN
          dbms_output.put_line('Masz juz otwarty raport');
          // or what should I do here ??
    END;I want to display the message in the popup window in my ADF application. How can I do that ?
    Regards,
    Wojtek.

    raise_application_error(-20001, 'error message');
    Scott

  • IE only: wwsec_app_priv.process_signon (User-Defined Exception) (WWC-41417)

    I am using Portal 3.0.6 in Sun SunOS 5.8. The site will be running in https mode. As everybody knows, 443 is the default port number for ssl mode. I setup the httpd.conf to 443. No problem. I ran ssodatan to relate Login Server to Portal - I had to specify 443 at the end of URL in ssodatan syntax. Otherwise, I got "Error:You cannot login because there is no configuration information stored in the enabler configuration table. (WWC-41439)" both in Netscape navigator and MS Internet Explorer.
    I now am able to log in Portal site. But, the problem happens just after loggin in. With Navigator I don't get any problems. But, IE gives me "Error: Unexpected error encountered in wwsec_app_priv.process_signon (User-Defined Exception) (WWC-41417)". I guess this happens because of how IE works with https. It takes 443 off from URL in https mode. The portal is unable to match the url and what it has in wwsec_enabler_config_info$ which has 443. When I tested with 444 as port number. It worked! Putting a port number in URL will be cumbersome. That's why I am trying with 443.
    I tried also with ssodatax to add an additional entry for without 443 as specified in a document "Oracle9ias Portal configuration options" page 30. Ssodatax has a bug so it updates existing entry, too. I had to update it back to its original value. It's fine. But, this time another error comes up. "WWC-00000". I don't see any solution for this.
    null

    When a new user is logging on for the first time, the portal adds them to the AUTHENTICATED_USERS group under the portal's group container. In your case, for some users, this is apparently running into some problem.
    To debug this, try turning on additional logging on the OID server and attempt logging in as these users, and see what is reported.
    You should enable the following debug flags:
    Search Filter Processing
    Access Control List Processing
    Status Log Connections/Operations/Results

  • "user defined exception" in a stored procedure and APEX

    I would like to use user defined exception in a stored procedure or trigger in a APEX application.
    Does anybody know how to do it ? or know where can I find a good reference ?
    Thanks,

    raise_application_error(-20001, 'error message');
    Scott

  • How to handle user defined exception from C#?

    Hi:
    I have some PL/SQL code that will throw a user defined exception if certain conditions are met. How do I handle user defined exceptions if this procedure/function is being called from C#? C# can handle a normal Oracle SQL error (e.g. ORA-XXXX) because they are defined in the proper class, but how do I get it to know about my user defined exception? Does anyone have any links to examples of doing this?
    Thanks.

    Hi Gaff,
    Is there a particular problem you're having doing this? It works as normal for me...
    Cheers
    Greg
    PLSQL
    =========
    create or replace procedure throwsomething as
    begin
    raise_application_error(-20001,'kaboom');
    end;
    ODP
    =====
        class Program
            static void Main(string[] args)
                using (OracleConnection con = new OracleConnection())
                    con.ConnectionString = "user id=scott;password=tiger;data source=orcl";
                    con.Open();
                    using (OracleCommand cmd = new OracleCommand())
                        cmd.CommandText = "begin throwsomething;end;";
                        cmd.Connection = con;
                        try
                            cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();
                        catch (OracleException oe)
                            Console.WriteLine("caught " + oe.Message);
    OUTPUT
    ========
    caught ORA-20001: kaboom
    ORA-06512: at "SCOTT.THROWSOMETHING", line 3
    ORA-06512: at line 1

  • In which of the following sections of a PL/SQL block is a user-defined exception raised?

    Hi,
    A (somewhat elementary) question:
    In which of the following sections of a PL/SQL block is a user-defined exception raised?
    a) Exception section
    b) Declarative section
    c) Error handling section
    d) Executable section
    I'd be interested to hear people's answers.
    Thanks.

    As Etbin already noted, there are only 3 sections and user-defined exception can be raised in any of them. User-defined exception raised in declarative section example:
    declare
        year_zero exception;
        pragma exception_init(year_zero,-01841);
    begin
        declare
            v_dt date := to_date(1721420,'j');
        begin
            null;
        end;
      exception
        when year_zero
          then
            dbms_output.put_line('Year 0!');
    end;
    Year 0!
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    SQL>
    User-defined exception raised in executable section example:
    declare
        year_zero exception;
        pragma exception_init(year_zero,-01841);
        v_dt date;
    begin
        v_dt := to_date(1721420,'j');
      exception
        when year_zero
          then
            dbms_output.put_line('Year 0!');
    end;
    Year 0!
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    SQL>
    User-defined exception raised in exception handling section example:
    declare
        year_zero exception;
        pragma exception_init(year_zero,-01841);
        v_dt date;
    begin
        declare
            v_num number;
        begin
            v_num := 1 / 0;
          exception
            when others
              then
                v_dt := to_date(1721420,'j');
        end;
      exception
        when year_zero
          then
            dbms_output.put_line('Year 0!');
    end;
    Year 0!
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    SQL>
    SY.

  • User defined Exception in Stateless Java Class WS

    Hi,
    I'm experimenting with publishing some of my application's Java classes as web services under OC4J 10.1.2. I've been quite successfull to do so, but I'm stuck into a problem trying to have my class's methods throw my own type of exception and retrieving it at the client side.
    I'm using the proxies downloaded from the web service's automatic HTML page, and I see in the source code version that the proxy class specifically throws a org.apache.soap.SOAPException whenever there's a fault in the response message.
    What I've done is simply to create a type derived from Exception with a String (message) and an Integer (code) properties, with just my own constructor that accepts two parameters corresponding to that properties. Then I make the methods in my Java class throw that exception.
    I've tried both using both an Interface and a class, and also using just a class as parameters to StatelessWebServiceServlet / Web Service Assembler.
    I can't find anywhere in any docs that explains how this can be done in OC4J. I believe that throwing user-defined exceptions is included in J2EE 1.4 and so I think that there should be a way to do it in OC4J if it is compliant. Maybe there's no way, but I couldn't find any reference to that neither.
    I'll greatly appreciate any light on this issue.
    Thanks in advance
    Juan Alvarez Ferrando
    Mensaje editado por:
    user517323

    Thank you for your answer.
    I'd like to know something more about how far does that limited support go, in case it could be of some use.
    On the other hand, and just for the sake of constructive discussion, though I've contemplated the option of encoding error conditions on the result type, I always found that to be an ugly style from a interface design standpoint (not ws specifically but in general system desing terms), and when I saw a standard way to communicate custom error information separated from normal response I thought it to be the right way to go. After all, exceptions are just the way Java implements this design principle that has also found a place in most currently successful software environments (PL/SQL, .Net, ...).
    I don't expect to extend the meaning and programmatic use of Java exceptions to my ws clients, but to be able to communicate detailed error condition information as the standards contemplate (faults), which as I understand from your kind answer is out of my reach in 10.1.2.
    I have no experience with other ws platforms but I'd like to believe that if wsdl:fault is in the standards, those claming compliance will support it to the extent necessary to make it usable and interoperable as it is the way the standard covers error communication (and so that's why it is included in 10.1.3). I also beleve this would bring better interoperability than our home-made result types including error information, that no other application without our custom specifications can understand.
    Also better interoperability would come from that than for example what I now see in 10.1.2, where all exceptions are communicated to the client with a faultcode of soap:Server, which I believe to have the standard meaning that there's a chance for the client to success retrying later without modifying it's request. This translation could be better suited for Java errors (unrecoverable) but not for all kinds of exceptions, and so in this question, custom exception support could also improve interoperability with systems that interpret SOAP fault codes.
    Thank you.
    Juan Alvarez Ferrando

  • Problem regd USER DEFINED Exception heirarchy

    I have a strange class heirarchy regarding 'User defined exceptions'.
    This the heirarchy being used:<p>
    public class ExCalcFail extends SysException {<p>
         public ExCalcFail(UserConnection uc) {<p>
         super(uc);<p>
    }<p>
    }<p>
    public class SysException extends AutoDBObjectBase {<p>
    public SysException(UserConnection uc) {<p>
    super(uc);<p>
    }<p>
    <p>
    -- WHERE UserConnection is an INTERFACE.
    <p>
    Now my question is:
    <p>
    How can class ExCalFail's constructor call super(uc)?
    If this is the case,when is SysException's constructor called?
    <p>
    As class SysException has no default constructor how is the call
    super(uc) executed in ExCalcFail?
    <p>
    Shouldnt this give an error?

    How long have you been here? I'm surprised you still don't know about code tags.
    You can simply call super(uc) because that's the constructor the superclass - namely SysException - declares. And it's executed when it's called - at the beginning of ExCalcFail's c'tor. Where else?
    Why should it produce an error? It's perfectly valid and common code.

  • User Defined Exceptions

    Hi.
    What exactly is the theme of User Defined Exceptions(in view of Exception hierarchy) ?
    As said so far, User defined exceptions are useful for handling logical & functional errors. But when a exception is found in the throw block can we write the code there itself...instead of writing in catch block???

    What exactly is the theme of User Defined
    Exceptions(in view of Exception hierarchy) ?Slightly blue, bordering on depressed-gray.
    As said so far, User defined exceptions are useful
    for handling logical & functional errors.No. Errors are for errors. Exceptions are for exceptions. Important.
    But when a
    exception is found in the throw block can we write
    the code there itself...instead of writing in catch
    block???Huh? Sort of an Early-Catch? No, unless you nest another try-catch inside that try block.

  • Trapping user defined exceptions in forms

    hi guys..
    i have a database trigger that goes like that:
    CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER loan_trig
    before insert on loans
    for each row
    declare
    lcount number(10);
    duplicate_loan exception;
    begin
    select count(1) into lcount from loans
    where branch_code=:new.branch_code
    and client_code=:new.client_code;
    if lcount>0 then
    raise duplicate_loan;
    end if;
    end;
    now how do i trap this user defined exception on the form ?
    declaring the exception in the form & handling it in the exeption handler section doesn't seem to work and i get the following error:
    "when button pressed trigger raised unhandled exception
    ora-06510"
    ora-06510:unhandled user-defined exception
    what am i doing wrong?
    if i have to handle the exception in the trigger body how do i do that?
    thankx in advance..

    Hello,
    raise duplicate_loan; won't avoid the trigger to insert and commit. If you really want to avoid the insertion, use the raise_applicatrion_error() instead.
    For instance : Raise_Application_Error( -20001, 'Insertion cannot be validated' );Then in your Forms module, you can catch it like this:
       Begin
       Insert Into ...
       when others then
          LC$Erreur := Substr( SQLERRM,1 , 500 );
          LN$err_code := ABS(SQLCODE);
          If LN$err_code = 20001 Then ...
       End;
    ...Francois

  • SQLCODE: 1 SQLERRM: User-Defined Exception.... HELP!!!!

    i encounter an error regarding releasing of product..
    the error says:
    p_log_level is 0
    Error occurred in WSH_PR_CRITERIA.Init_Rules
    SQLCODE: 1 SQLERRM: User-Defined Exception
    Exception occurred in WSH_PICK_LIST
    can anyone resolve this problem.. thankx.
    BDR

    Check Note: 443365.1 - Pick Release Errors Out With WSH_PR_CRITERIA.Init_Rules Related Errors
    https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=443365.1

Maybe you are looking for