User metadata values is showing as plain text in Mysites after upgrading from 2010 to 2013

We have upgraded our Mysite from 2010 to 2013, after upgrading User metadata values is showing as plain text where
as in 2010 it has shown as hyperlinks.
In Mysite 2010 by clicking on user metadata for favorite sports, Favorite Movies etc...it will give the results from search containing same value for other user
by going to search results page. After upgrading it to 2013 (with 2010 UI) and running full crawls, I am able to search by clicking on any user property.
After upgrading look and feel to 2013 version these fields showing as plain text. Can anyone suggest how can we get hyperlinks and how can we make user
metadata searchable directly by clicking on Property value from Mysite. Below screen print explain you the difference clearly.
Santosh

Hi Inderjeet, thanks for the update.
I am running with SP1 + july2014 CU.
Search is working fine, I am able to get search results from search page, here the problem is I cannot go to search results by directly clicking on a property.
In SP 2010, If I click on favourite sports team, (Chelsea football) it will open search results page with all users who have given this team name.
Where as in SP 2013, this data is appearing as plain text in mysites(Please note before UI upgrade, I am able to search as in SP 2010). You can notice the difference in my above screenshot.
Is this default behaviour in SP 2013? Has anything changed or am I missing something.
Santosh

Similar Messages

Custom metadata properties give no results after upgrade from 2010

Hi,
Although I see my custom managed properties in my Search Schema in Central Admin, I am unable to find results using them e.g. 'VendorName:Marcel'. I have tried changing the column value in a document and performed a full crawl, but still no results. General
searches such as 'Marcel' work fine and even something like 'author:marcel' (which is a built in managed property) works too. What am I missing? How can I determine the issue? Nothing stands out in the ULS logs.
Background:
I recently upgraded my managed metadata service and search service from 2010 to 2013.
I then upgraded the content db holding my root site collection, and had to re-create my search service proxy to get searches to work. I then upgraded the content db which holds my content hub site collection. This includes site columns, many of which
are also Managed Properties.
Crawls are running with 8 errors - none of which are for the document I changed. Warnings are mainly about 'png' files.
In 2010 I had scopes, which I no longer see in Central Admin. Although I have converted the content database without error, I have not converted the Site Collection to 2013 yet.
macrel

I had to set each metadata property 'queryable' property and then run a full crawl after which the results were returned. I am surprised that this did not come over from the upgrade of the search service.
macrel

Some Site Collection not showing up (even the system pages) after upgrade

Hi All -
Following http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc263299.aspx I just did database upgrade from 2010 to 2013. Some of the site collections are not showing up. These are basic site collection with almost no custom code. Just bunch of list and libraries.
Not even the system pages such as web part gallery, masterpage setting page none are opening. I check the Correlation ID and the log file is showing the below error
Name=Request (GET:http://<siteurl>/_Layouts/ChangeSiteMasterPage.aspx) 5bb6669c-24a6-70d4-9fcd-23851c953ba2 01/03/2014 11:48:56.80 w3wp.exe (0x1858) 0x198C SharePoint Foundation Authentication Authorization agb9s Medium Non-OAuth request. IsAuthenticated=True,
UserIdentityName=, ClaimsCount=0 5bb6669c-24a6-70d4-9fcd-23851c953ba2 01/03/2014 11:48:56.81 w3wp.exe (0x1858) 0x198C SharePoint Foundation Logging Correlation Data xmnv Medium Site=/sites/WK-Advisors 5bb6669c-24a6-70d4-9fcd-23851c953ba2 01/03/2014 11:48:56.83
w3wp.exe (0x1858) 0x198C SharePoint Foundation Files 00000 High UserAgent not available, file operations may not be optimized. at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPFileStreamManager.CreateCobaltStreamContainer(SPFileStreamStore spfs, ILockBytes ilb, Boolean copyOnFirstWrite,
Boolean disposeIlb) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPFileStreamManager.SetInputLockBytes(SPFileInfo& fileInfo, SqlSession session, PrefetchResult prefetchResult) at Microsoft.SharePoint.CoordinatedStreamBuffer.SPCoordinatedStreamBufferFactory.CreateFromDocumentRowset(Guid
databaseId, SqlSession session, SPFileStreamManager spfstm, Object[] metadataRow, SPRowset contentRowset, SPDocumentBindRequest& dbreq, SPDocumentBindResults& dbres) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSqlClient.GetDocumentContentRow(Int32 rowOrd, Object ospFileStmMgr,
SPDocumentBindRequest& dbreq, SPDocumentBindResults& dbres... 5bb6669c-24a6-70d4-9fcd-23851c953ba2 01/03/2014 11:48:56.83* w3wp.exe (0x1858) 0x198C SharePoint Foundation Files 00000 High ...) at Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequestInternalClass.GetFileAndMetaInfo(String
bstrUrl, Byte bPageView, Byte bPageMode, Byte bGetBuildDependencySet, String bstrCurrentFolderUrl, Int32 iRequestVersion, Byte bMainFileRequest, Boolean& pbCanCustomizePages, Boolean& pbCanPersonalizeWebParts, Boolean& pbCanAddDeleteWebParts, Boolean&
pbGhostedDocument, Boolean& pbDefaultToPersonal, Boolean& pbIsWebWelcomePage, String& pbstrSiteRoot, Guid& pgSiteId, UInt32& pdwVersion, String& pbstrTimeLastModified, String& pbstrContent, UInt32& pdwPartCount, Object&
pvarMetaData, Object& pvarMultipleMeetingDoclibRootFolders, String& pbstrRedirectUrl, Boolean& pbObjectIsList, Guid& pgListId, UInt32& pdwItemId, Int64& pllListFlags, Boolean& pbAccessDenied, Guid& pgDocid, Byte& piLevel,
UInt64& ppermMask, ... 5bb6669c-24a6-70d4-9fcd-23851c953ba2 01/03/2014 11:48:56.83* w3wp.exe (0x1858) 0x198C SharePoint Foundation Files 00000 High ...Object& pvarBuildDependencySet, UInt32& pdwNumBuildDependencies, Object& pvarBuildDependencies,
String& pbstrFolderUrl, String& pbstrContentTypeOrder, Guid& pgDocScopeId) at Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequestInternalClass.GetFileAndMetaInfo(String bstrUrl, Byte bPageView, Byte bPageMode, Byte bGetBuildDependencySet, String bstrCurrentFolderUrl,
Int32 iRequestVersion, Byte bMainFileRequest, Boolean& pbCanCustomizePages, Boolean& pbCanPersonalizeWebParts, Boolean& pbCanAddDeleteWebParts, Boolean& pbGhostedDocument, Boolean& pbDefaultToPersonal, Boolean& pbIsWebWelcomePage, String&
pbstrSiteRoot, Guid& pgSiteId, UInt32& pdwVersion, String& pbstrTimeLastModified, String& pbstrContent, UInt32& pdwPartCount, Object& pvarMetaData, Object& pvarMultipleMeetingDoclibRootFolders, String& pbst... 5bb6669c-24a6-70d4-9fcd-23851c953ba2
01/03/2014 11:48:56.83* w3wp.exe (0x1858) 0x198C SharePoint Foundation Files 00000 High ...rRedirectUrl, Boolean& pbObjectIsList, Guid& pgListId, UInt32& pdwItemId, Int64& pllListFlags, Boolean& pbAccessDenied, Guid& pgDocid, Byte&
piLevel, UInt64& ppermMask, Object& pvarBuildDependencySet, UInt32& pdwNumBuildDependencies, Object& pvarBuildDependencies, String& pbstrFolderUrl, String& pbstrContentTypeOrder, Guid& pgDocScopeId) at Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.GetFileAndMetaInfo(String
bstrUrl, Byte bPageView, Byte bPageMode, Byte bGetBuildDependencySet, String bstrCurrentFolderUrl, Int32 iRequestVersion, Byte bMainFileRequest, Boolean& pbCanCustomizePages, Boolean& pbCanPersonalizeWebParts, Boolean& pbCanAddDeleteWebParts, Boolean&
pbGhostedDocument, Boolean& pbDefaultToPersonal, Boolean& pbIsWebWelcomePage, String& pbstrSiteRoot, Guid& pgSiteId, UInt32& pdwVersion,... 5bb6669c-24a6-70d4-9fcd-23851c953ba2 01/03/2014 11:48:56.83* w3wp.exe (0x1858) 0x198C SharePoint
Foundation Files 00000 High ... String& pbstrTimeLastModified, String& pbstrContent, UInt32& pdwPartCount, Object& pvarMetaData, Object& pvarMultipleMeetingDoclibRootFolders, String& pbstrRedirectUrl, Boolean& pbObjectIsList, Guid&
pgListId, UInt32& pdwItemId, Int64& pllListFlags, Boolean& pbAccessDenied, Guid& pgDocid, Byte& piLevel, UInt64& ppermMask, Object& pvarBuildDependencySet, UInt32& pdwNumBuildDependencies, Object& pvarBuildDependencies,
String& pbstrFolderUrl, String& pbstrContentTypeOrder, Guid& pgDocScopeId) at Microsoft.SharePoint.SPWeb.GetWebPartPageContent(Uri pageUrl, Int32 pageVersion, PageView requestedView, HttpContext context, Boolean forRender, Boolean includeHidden,
Boolean mainFileRequest, Boolean fetchDependencyInformation, Boolean& ghostedPage, String& siteRoot, Guid& siteId, Int64& bytes, ... 5bb6669c-24a6-70d4-9fcd-23851c953ba2 01/03/2014 11:48:56.83* w3wp.exe (0x1858) 0x198C SharePoint Foundation
Files 00000 High ...Guid& docId, UInt32& docVersion, String& timeLastModified, Byte& level, Object& buildDependencySetData, UInt32& dependencyCount, Object& buildDependencies, SPWebPartCollectionInitialState& initialState, Object&
oMultipleMeetingDoclibRootFolders, String& redirectUrl, Boolean& ObjectIsList, Guid& listId) at Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationRuntime.SPRequestModuleData.FetchWebPartPageInformationForInit(HttpContext context, SPWeb spweb, Boolean mainFileRequest,
String path, Boolean impersonate, Boolean& isAppWeb, Boolean& fGhostedPage, Guid& docId, UInt32& docVersion, String& timeLastModified, SPFileLevel& spLevel, String& masterPageUrl, String& customMasterPageUrl, String& webUrl,
String& siteUrl, Guid& siteId, Object& buildDependencySetData, SPWebPartCollectionInitialState& initialState, ... 5bb6669c-24a6-70d4-9fcd-23851c953ba2 01/03/2014 11:48:56.83* w3wp.exe (0x1858) 0x198C SharePoint Foundation Files 00000 High ...String&
siteRoot, String& redirectUrl, Object& oMultipleMeetingDoclibRootFolders, Boolean& objectIsList, Guid& listId, Int64& bytes) at Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationRuntime.SPRequestModuleData.GetWebPartPageData(HttpContext context, String path,
Boolean throwIfFileNotFound) at Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationRuntime.SPVirtualPathProvider.GetCacheKey(String virtualPath) at System.Web.Compilation.BuildManager.GetVPathBuildResultFromCacheInternal(VirtualPath virtualPath, Boolean ensureIsUpToDate) at
System.Web.Compilation.BuildManager.GetVPathBuildResultInternal(VirtualPath virtualPath, Boolean noBuild, Boolean allowCrossApp, Boolean allowBuildInPrecompile, Boolean throwIfNotFound, Boolean ensureIsUpToDate) at System.Web.Compilation.BuildManager.GetVPathBuildResultWithN...
5bb6669c-24a6-70d4-9fcd-23851c953ba2 01/03/2014 11:48:56.83* w3wp.exe (0x1858) 0x198C SharePoint Foundation Files 00000 High ...oAssert(HttpContext context, VirtualPath virtualPath, Boolean noBuild, Boolean allowCrossApp, Boolean</siteurl>
According to this article, I need to verify whether sites are working in 2010 mode. Next step is to change the authentication. Should I proceed to change the authentication mode before resolving this issue?
<siteurl></siteurl>
<siteurl>Regards,</siteurl>
<siteurl>Khushi
</siteurl>
<siteurl></siteurl>
Khushi

Hi
Khushi ,
Yes , you need to proceed to change the authentication mode . According to your error message “Non-OAuth request. IsAuthenticated=True, UserIdentityName=, ClaimsCount=0” and “UserAgent not available, file
operations may not be optimized”, all of them can be caused by the authenticate. So make sure you have upgraded cleanly and effectively to Claims Based Authentication.
For more detail information, you can refer to the article:
Migrate from classic-mode to claims-based authentication in SharePoint 2013
Best Regards,
Eric
Eric Tao
TechNet Community Support

When I send an email from Apple mail, it send inbedded links, not embedded, my font shows as plain text and signature sends as attachment??

When I send an email from Apple mail, it send inbedded links, not embedded, my font shows as plain text and signature sends as attachment??

inbedded is not a word.

After upgrading from acrobat 9.5 to XI pro my users have complained on slow typing when filling in form that were created in version 9.5?

After upgrading from acrobat 9.5 to XI pro my users have complained on slow typing when filling in form that were created in version 9.5?
The issue is they type but there is 2 second delay when it appears in the field.
Windows 7 64bit

I see, I misread your reference to Reader 11 to mean you were using Acrobat 11, but it looks like it worked out anyway.
The base-14 fonts are special in PDF because they are guaranteed to be available even if they are not embedded. If you select a non-base-14 font for use with a form field, the entire font usually gets embedded, since each glyph it contains has to be available for use with the field. This can take up a lot of space if you do this a lot, and the space isn't reduced if you change back to a base-14 font later because the internal reference to it is not removed. This is caused by the bug I mentioned.
In your case, however, the entire font doesn't get embedded because fonts like it (e.g., large asian fonts with a lot of glyphs, Arial Unicode) would take up too much space if fully embedded. If it did, a 100KB PDF could bloat to 20MB with that one change. Instead, users are expected to have such fonts installed on their system, which is why you were prompted to install the font pack. This despite the fact that the font was not actually used by anything in your document, it was simply the orphaned reference to it that triggered this. This should get fixed in Acrobat eventually so this type of thing doesn't happen again.

After upgrade from TFS 2010 users cannot view source control

I recently did a in place of upgrade of TFS 2010 to TFS 2013. All of my users permissions stayed in tact. The users (contributors) cannot view any of the source control in either in VS 2010 or 2013. Since I am the administrator I
see everything and have no issue. Is there something that did not get brought over in the upgrade?

Hi Rrenn49,
Thanks for your post.
You upgraded to TFS 2013 Update 4? There’s no any issue or warning during upgrade process?
What’s the detailed message they received when the contributors try to view source control files?
Please manually check the contributors group’s permissions on your TFS Source Control.
If you add a new user into your contributors group, this new user can access TFS Source Control correctly?
If you have any further research of this issue, please share your experience here.
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

After upgrading from Snow Leopard to Mountain Lion, the text preference, Middle Eastern, causes Photoshop CS6 to slow down. Can this be fixed?

After upgrading from Snow Leopard to Mountain Lion, and setting the text preference, Middle Eastern, causes Photoshop CS6 to slow down. Can this be fixed?

I'm Win, not Mac, but I do have a couple saved messages
Mac 10.8.3 Bug w/Encore and BluRay http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1198709
-create folder not ISO http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1216127

Custom Auto Attendant Prompts through TUI not working for users who migrated from 2010 to 2013

In Exchange 2010, we started using unified messaging and set up Auto Attendants. We setup a admin role/RBAC for people of a security group to be able to update the message on the auto attendants. They have the UMPrompts assigned role. All of this is working
great in 2010. We have now migrated to 2013, and the users who were migrated from 2010 to 2013 can no longer update the messages through TUI. Newly created 2013 users can and are assigned the EXASCT same permission as the users who have been doing this for
well over a year on 2010. When they call the AA and press #,* they are asked to provide their extension, after doing so the system tells them that extension is not correct. and asks for the extension again. Newly created users with the same permissions
get prompted for their PIN and can log in and change the message just fine.
Confirmed Bug? anybody else having this issue?
What would be different for this process between a user who was migrated from a previous version like 2010 compared to a newer user who has only ever existed on 2013?

What if the migrated 2010 users are in the same DB as the system mailbox? I had a similar issue during a migration; http://www.skypeadmin.com/2014/11/10/known-issue-um-automated-attendant-tui-editing-broken-migration/
Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question please click "Mark As Answer".
SWC Unified Communications
This forum post is based upon my personal experience and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

Metadata values not showing in Site Studio layout using Idoc Script

Hi All,
We have a SS layout (secondary) with replaceable regions for showing content that is listed in a primary page dynamic list.
Part of the layout shows contribution elements of Contributor Data File content items, but part of layout also shows metadata values. We use  to show the content item Title with no problems.
However, for some content items, some metadata values are not showing on the layout - specifically a custom metadata field called xFinishDate (which is of type 'Date' in Config Man). The code  simply does not work (nothing is displayed) for some content items, despite definitely having a set FinishDate value. Some other content items show this value fine.
The  value works for ALL items, but the  does not, and there appears to be no difference between the items that it does, and does not work for. They are all CDF, same DocType, same CheckIn profile, etc.
The non-working items are all released and indexed. Their Content Information in Content Server shows complete metadata. I have resubmitted the non-working items for reconversion in Repo Man but no luck.
Is there something I am missing? Any help is greatly appreciated.
Luke.

Actually the default DOC_INFO resultset that is on the page seems to be for the content item being loaded into the secondary layout's replaceable regions. This is why DOC_INFO.dDocTitle gives the results expected.
However, I think I have discovered why the xFinishDate value was not showing. Using sapan's code (and modifying it a bit) I was able to print out all the metadata field names and values for default DOC_INFO resultset.
Using this URL as an example: http://www.bond.edu.au/about-bond/jobs-at-bond/BD3_011217
At the top of page region (replaceable) where the Contributor Data File is loaded into, the DOC_INFO resultset is relevant to the content item that is being loaded into the layout (content ID: BD3_011217 - as per the URL format), which is what we want.
However, throughout the Contributor Data File content, if a link is made using the Site Studio link wizard via FCK Editor (in the above case, it is the position description link, which is a link to a PDF) and the link is 'Link to a file' and the 'Choose Target section' is selected as 'Use default website section metadata', the resulting link looks like "http://www.bond.edu.au/about-bond/jobs-at-bond/BD3_011216". Any references to the DOC_INFO resultset on the page after the instance of this link now use the metadata of the content item referred to in the link, not the original content item. I have dumped out the DOC_INFO fields/values in different parts of the layout to prove this. The linked content item has no xFinishDate value so this is why nothing displays (displaying xFinishDate needs to happen after the link to the position description).
I guess I need to either:
- change the way the link is made to the content item to "Link to the Content Item's URL", but I would prefer not to expose the resulting path e.g. "[!--$HttpRelativeWebRoot--]groups/group-name/@account-name/documents/content-type/content-id.pdf"
- explicitly make a resultset using  with the content ID I know I want and use it instead of the default DOC_INFO one. Is there any other way to make a resultset comprising of a single item's metadata?
9.45 SS_GET_SEARCH_RESULTS
■ Description: This is a wrapper around the regular CS GET_SEARCH_RESULTS
service. It allows some Site Studio features to be specified simply as flags and have
the real query syntax be constructed on the server. It can modify the standard
'SearchResults' resultset to contain an additional column called 'ssUrl' which will
contain the Site Studio-friendly url for all of the search results.
■ Parameters:
– siteId: the unique identifier of the site (required).
– ssLimitScope: True/False, restricting scope to within the site only (optional).
– ssUserSearchText: user-supplied search text (optional).
– ssWebsiteObjectType: object type (optional).
– computeFriendlyUrls: True/False, modify results to include ssUrl (optional).
■ Returns: resultset named ’Search Results’.
■ Security: The user must have at write access to at least one security group on the
content server
Thanks to everyone for their help. Almost there!
Edited by: lukeb2112 on 18/01/2010 17:30

How to fix width of plain text content control in Microsoft Word 2010?

I try to make the simplest solution for my custom to modify current Word template without hard code anything except field name.
As you can see above image, normally text field in Word is not fixed width control. So, it may affect document layout. Moreover, I want to add dotted line below all text fields in document template.
Is there any possible solution that end-user can do in normal Microsoft Word 2010 application?
PS. I will fill all controls with data from Microsoft Access.

In PDF file, I can easily create fix-size absolute position field inside document template like the following document. In Microsoft Word, I cannot fix even the size of plain text field.
PS. Nobody use table with fixed cell size as normal form (hard copy). I think Microsoft Word is really bad choice for creating any document template by end-user.
Criticizing Word for not doing the same as some other application is hardly relevant. Have you tried word-processing with Adobe Acrobat?
As for your PS, Word tables are ideal for the kind of thing you describe. Your assertion that 'nobody' does so is plain ignorance - it is a common practice. In my previous employment,
many forms were created using Word tables. Before complaining Word is a 'really bad choice', you should learn how to use it.
Cheers
Paul Edstein
[MS MVP - Word]

Are plain text files treated differently in SP 2010 than MOSS 2007?

We just moved to SP 2010 a week ago. A user just contacted us asking why the files she accesses are not displaying.
When she accessed these plain text files in MOSS 2007, they displayed within IE as a full page of text.
When she accesses these now in SP 2010, she is prompted to download the file.
These files do not end in .txt - they are names such as 2013.09.20 or whatever.
Is there a way to configure 2010 to display, without any interpretation, plain text files within the browser?
Thank you.

Hi ,
According to your description, my understanding is that you could not access the txt files with browser after migrading to SharePoint 2010..
Whether this issue occurred if you upload a new txt file to a library.
In my testing, everything worked well. The Open Documents in Client Applications by Default feature was acitve, and in the Library Settings->Advanced settings, ‘Use the server default(Open in the client application)’ was selected. When I clicked the file
name, it promted a dialog like the below, I selected ‘Read-Only’, and clicked OK, the file could open with browser.
Please go to IE->Tools->Internet Options->Programs->Manage add-ons, enable all add-ons related to SharePoint, compare the result.
I hope this helps.
Thanks,
Wendy
Wendy Li
TechNet Community Support

Problem with PO text in ME22 after upgrade

Hi,
I face an issue in Purchase Order Text. We have recently done the upgrade from SAP 4.6 C to SAP ECC 6.0. Before upgrade, the users were entering required texts in ME22 transaction for each item and select the check button available. All the text types ticked here are carried forward and printed on the Delivery output.
After upgrade, this tick is removed from all the existing documents and also for the new POu2019s users select this button and save it. But, when they come back and see it in change mode ME22, the tick is not available. Because of this issue, these texts are not printed in delivery outputs now.
I have checked this problem in SAP. No relevant notes are available. Has anyone faced this issue before? Can you please throw some light on the same?
Thanks and Regards
Vijayakrishna

Hi
Please, see these notes
Note 751441 - Consulting: Settings for texts from purchase order
Note 53593 - Q&A - Delivery text from stock transfer order
Note 417883 - Texts from purchase order
and related notes. They talk about how to copy text from PO to delivery (for instance, in SC, STO and so on). It's related with some customizing steps in VOTXN and some VOFM subroutines that perhaps they are lost after the upgrade.
I hope this help you
Regards
Eduardo
Edited by: E_Hinojosa on Aug 24, 2011 10:22 AM

Why is my iPhone 4S dead, not showing in iTunes, won't charge after upgrading to 5.1.1???????!!!!!!!??

After upgrading my iphone 4S to 5.1.1 I had a problem... woke up one morning and my phone was DEAD! It was completely non responsive, not showing up in iTunes, not charging from my Mophie, or A/C or Mac.
I wanted to post the fix that worked for me in case anyone else out there is having the same heart pulpitations I was this morning. In the online communities Parisilia had posted a fix to do a hard reset (Hold down the home button and power button simultaneously for several seconds, the phone will reboot and will then be recognized in iTunes and you can restore from backup). This worked for me - PHEW!! Off the ledge...
Once my phone rebooted it didn't actually need a restore because it hadn't 'reset' - everything was as it was the night before, although the battery had gone from 51% to 41% Personally I'm shocked that it would drain 10% in one night and who knows how long it was 'dead' for after I put it to bed at 11:45pm????!!
This is my second iPhone 4S since Oct 2011 - the first one had to be replaced because of something radically wrong with the battery capability. After several very frustrating months of trying various fixes Apple finally took the phone back thinking it musta been a dud. I've had this one for about 3 months and it's been much better battery-wise, but now the mysterious DOA event has me seriously worried that I have another dud. Looking thru the communities there seem to be many more people experiencing the same issue, so hopefully it's software and can be fixed (APPLE ARE YOU LISTENING??) rather than me being up the creek again.
Good luck to anyone else experiencing the same issue.

Try
1. Totally remove iTunes and QuickTime
see
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1926
2. then you will need to do a "deep clean" of registry
by this I mean a registry search for itunes and delete any and every key you find
*however if you do not know how to do this safely don't try it*
unfortunately the registry cleaners do not clean to this level
and itunes leaves considerable detritus in the registry which can screw up updates and or reinstalls
Apple needs a cleaner similar to Norton's effort which has similar problems. Their tool removes ALL evidence of a previous anti virus installation which is what the above solution achieves in iTunes

User Exit issue after upgrade from 4.6c to ECC 6.0

Hi Experts,
After upgrade we are facing some issues regarding user exit. In 4.6c we have implemented several user exit to do customization in several module like SD,FI and HR. But after upgrade it has been identified that SAP has already provided this functionality in ECC 6.0. Now our problem is when this transactions are called or executed control is going to both custom and standard code. Which took long time to execute and causing performance issue.
Is there any ways to identify which are the functionality SAP has provided in ECC 6.0 so that we can delete our custom user exits.

Hi
List all the user exits which you have modified and check in OSS notes you will get the OSS note with all the details what functionality has been changed. Based on this you can delete or retain the user exits which ever you want.
Regards,
JB

Outlook client not connecting when a user is moved from 2010 to 2013

Dear all,
we are exchange 2010 SP3 we migrate to exchange server 2013 sp1 cu7 all the mailbox migrated cannot connect to outlook client
howver, user on 2010 cannot redirect from exchange 2013 to 2010.
jibmud

Greetings! Just want to make sure I understand. You are saying that user mailboxes migrated to Exchange 2013 cannot connect? When you say Exchange 2010 users cannot connect to Exchange 2010 via 2013, how are they doing that? OWA?
What does Outlook connection status indicate?
How are your 2010 clients connecting and have all records been updated to point to Exchange 2013 servers? Do you happen to be using Outlook Anywhere internally?
Not sure if it applies to your environment but you may want to check this out:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2013/05/23/ambiguous-urls-and-their-effect-on-exchange-2010-to-exchange-2013-migrations.aspx

User metadata values is showing as plain text in Mysites after upgrading from 2010 to 2013

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for