User should not be able to edit characteristics Value

Hi Friends
I have requirement where in a user creates a document with Two characteristics assigned to that Document.
Say CHAR1 and CHAR2.
When he creates DIR , He assigns value to these characteristics
CHAR1 = 666454
CHAR2 = 55333
No I want No other user to be able to change the values assigned to both CHAR1 and CHAR2.
Can this be possible.
With Regards
Mangesh Pande

Hi Mangesh,
I think the easiest way to find an authorization object which prevents users to edit characteristic values would be to made an authorization trace in transaction ST01. For further information please see the following link:
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/PLM/AuthorizationTrace-+ST01
This trace lists all checked authorization objects and you should be able to identify a suitbale object for restricting edit permission for classification values.
Best regards,
Christoph

Similar Messages

  • How do I disable editing of pages in author mode? User should not be able to edit content . Can this

    How do I disable editing of pages in author mode? User should not be able to edit content . Can this be customized on component basis?

    You have to remove modify rights for those users on that page. Component basis is possible but will create ACL complications. Please check http://dev.day.com/docs/en/cq/current/developing/components/boilerplates.html for that.
    Yogesh
    www.wemblog.com

  • User should not be able to change the payment terms

    Dear All,
    My issue is that user should not be able to change the payment terms in any of the document.I have tried to do it through authorization but it is not working out.
    Mona.

    Dear Mona,
    This may only be done through SP_Transaction_Notification.
    Thanks,
    Gordon

  • User should not be able to import a request.

    Dear Forum,
    We have a role created with all the transaction (*) given to a user.
    We want to revoke/restrict the authorization to import a request.  User be able to create/edit/release the request but should not be able to import.  This should happen without changing to existing (*) but at the same time user should not able to import.
    <removed_by_moderator>
    Regards,
    DD
    Edited by: Julius Bussche on Feb 18, 2009 10:48 AM

    > And in the new role you can restrict the user.
    I suspect the how was the original question. S_TRANSPRT is the (already given) answer. Deriving will do nothing for that object as not one of its fields is organizational. Besides that, restricting some more objects to make sure the user cannot create and/or use any workarounds is essential to make this work properly.
    The additional request This should happen without changing to existing (*) scares me a bit. Why do these users need over 70000 transactions?

  • User should not be able to cancel Proforma invoice if Excise Invoice Exist

    Dear All ,
                     I have a requirement that i have a performa invoice for which a excise invoice is created and then when i go to VF02 and check on Complete the i want to check whether the exicise invoice is cancelled or not . Can Anybody help me out with the exit name in which i can apply the check.
    Regards
    Shankar
    Edited by: Shankar  SB on May 10, 2010 5:38 AM
    Edited by: Shankar  SB on May 10, 2010 5:41 AM
    Edited by: Shankar  SB on May 20, 2010 3:13 AM

    Hi,
    Standard setting is not available.You need to write the specific code in Sales order change exist by checking the VBEP -schedule line table where the PR exists.so for the line item the Plant should not be changeable.
    Sales Order Change exit the following requirement has to be incorporated.
    You can find the user exits in SPRO-Sales and DistributionSystem ModificationsUser Exits--User Exits for Order Processing.
    Regards,
    Saju.S

  • Manuals users should not be able to submit a concurrent program at a specific time frame:

    Hi
    Please let me know is it possible to restrict some users to submit a Concurrent program during a selected time frame .
    Eg we have an issue in which Process Lockboxes concurrent Program is submitted by the batch user and is also by the Users manually from Front end .What I want is that during a particular time frame everyday say from 12:00 AM to 6 PM I want to restrict manual users to submit this program ,whereas the Program can be submitted by the Batch user any time  .
    Please let me if its possible to achieve this and how .
    Thanks
    Rishabh

    Please don't post duplicates -- restrict user to submit concurrent Program
    Continue the discussion in your original post.
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • User should not be voiding the dispute created by other User

    Hi,
    I having an Issue at my work place.I have got a Requirement from the Finance Functional Folks that the user should be able to create the dispute case and also void the case created by him.But the user should not be able to void the dispute case created by the Other user.
                                           As of now when I am testing the user is able to void the dispute case created by him and also void the dispute case created by other user.So now I am trying to restrict so that user should not be able to void the dispute case created by other user.
    In the Roles Built at work place I have fdm_coll01-collections Management and also udm_dispute-dispute manamgement T-codes built in One Role.can any one of you let me know at which authorization object this can be restricted as I am having a hard time trying to find out.
    In Ideal SAP World what my idea was a Dispute case created by the user in Production should not be allowed to void the dispute case.so creating a dispute case and voiding a dispute case should be treated differently and should be done by different persons in an organization.

    In Ideal SAP World what my idea was a Dispute case created by the user in Production should not be allowed to void the dispute case.so creating a dispute case and voiding a dispute case should be treated differently and should be done by different persons in an organization.
    So why not talk back to your FI Folks. Also check with your Compliance Team.
    But anyhow, I do not see in the real world a conflict of duties by giving access to both creating a Dispute and voiding a dispute and more over voiding a dispute is considered critical since it would allow to Release Blocked Orders.
    But the user should not be able to void the dispute case created by the Other user.
    If every transcation and conversation with a Customer is recorded in the Collections Management system, I do not see a requirement for the same Team Member having access to close a dispute created by other user. 
    AB.

  • User should not have edit access in EAS

    Hello Gurus,
    My requirement is : I or my team mates are not supposed to have any access in EAS to make any changes to applications / databases on an Essbase server. i.e. I should only be able to view outline, see statistics, see if any sessions are running etc. I should not be able to copy application, create application, delete application, edit outlines etc.
    Please let me know if there is a way to do it.
    Thanks

    Viewing Active User Sessions
    "The Sessions window displays a list of active sessions. If you have Administrator permissions, the window lists active user sessions for all users on the Essbase Server. If you have Application Manager permissions, the window lists active sessions for all users, including yourself, who are connected to any application for which you have Application Manager permissions."
    Cheers
    John

  • User should not be allowed to login 2 times to an application from same m/c

    Hi Everyone,
    I have to find all possible solutions to below problem:
    Problem: User should not be allowed to login 2 times to an application from same machine.
    Steps to produce the problem:
    1) User 1 logins to application.
    2) User 1 tries to login with different credentials from same machine.
    3) User 1 should be presented with a message that he cannot login from same machine using 2 browsers.
    4) User 2 tries to login to application with credentials of user 1. System should now display an alert to both users on System 1 and System 2 of this conflict.
    Please share your thoughts regarding above problem.
    Thank you
    Edited by: rishab.garg on Feb 25, 2009 10:53 PM

    When a user logs in to application flag it in database. Irrespective of client machine and browser when another user tries to login using same user id you will be able to identify that easily using stored flag against the user id.
    If you want to distinguish between client machine for displaying different messages you can easily do this by comparing client IP address. To obtain client IP address use:
    request.getRemoteAddr();Note that getRemoteAddr() might return last proxy machine's IP address (in case proxy is used) instead of client's machine. In that case you may consider using cookie (though using cookie is not a great idea).
    Thanks,
    Mrityunjoy
    Edited by: mrityunjoy on 28 Feb, 2009 11:43 PM

  • Can't log on with administrator user by finding the message "The task you are trying to do can't be completed because Remote Desktop Services is currently busy. Please try again in a few minutes. Other users should still be able to log on.

    Hi,
    Now, my Windows 2008 R2 Enterprise server are running in the domain. It have problem about some one in my team have remote my server with the user administrator while I'm remote it now. It make my session loss. I tried to remote it again but I found
    the message at the log on screen about "The task you are trying to do can't be completed because Remote Desktop Services is currently busy. Please try again in a few minutes. Other users should still be able to log on."
    Now, nobody can't remote with administrator user into this server. I have check the application log. I found the error message like this.
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Source: Desktop Window Manager
    Event ID: 9003
    Detail: None The Desktop Window Manager was unable to start because a composited theme is not in use
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Source: Microsoft-Windows-Winsrv
    Event ID:10002 
    Detail: The following application was terminated because it was hung: mmc.exe.
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Source: Microsoft-Windows-Winsrv
    Event ID:10002 
    Detail: The following application was terminated because it was hung: javaw.exe.
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Source: Microsoft-Windows-Winsrv
    Event ID:10002 
    Detail: The following application was terminated because it was hung: Explorer.exe.
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Source:Desktop Window Manager
    Event ID:9009
    Detail:The Desktop Window Manager has exited with code (0x40010004)
     ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    Source:Microsoft-Windows-Winlogon
    Event ID:6005
    Detail:The winlogon notification subscriber <Sens> is taking long time to handle the notification event (Logoff).
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    In addition, I can log on this server with other user but I can't log off by it's showing the message "please wait for the system Event Notification service". Normally, the problem can solve by reboot the server. But how can be solve this problem
    by we do not reboot the server?

    Hi,
    The cause of unable to remote back to the server seems to be services hung, please try to reset session as the article below guides to see if it works:
    Windows Server: Remote Desktop Error: The task you are trying to do can't be completed because Remote Desktop Services is currently busy
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/28636.windows-server-remote-desktop-error-the-task-you-are-trying-to-do-can-t-be-completed-because-remote-desktop-services-is-currently-busy.aspx
    If the issue can always be re-produced, then I would suggest you fully patch the system.
    More information for you:
    The task you are trying to do can't be completed because Remote Desktop Services is currently busy. Please try again in a few minutes. Other users should still be able to log on
    https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windows/en-US/c58bfbd5-1d63-47e3-a489-6d8c8778b76b/the-task-you-are-trying-to-do-cant-be-completed-because-remote-desktop-services-is-currently-busy?forum=winserverTS
    Best Regards,
    Amy
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and un-mark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

  • How to disable Refresh,Reload in browser and user should not allow to multiple browser sessions ?

    Dear All,
    How to disable Refresh,Reload in browser and end user should not allow to multiple browser sessions in portal.Where we need to configure the settings or any code in masthead or any other component. My server version is 7.4 - SP5 .Please help us.
    Thanks for advance,
    BR,
    Durga Rao.

    Dear all,
    i am able to logoff the click refresh button on keyboard.I am using this code to log off the user into the portal.
    document.onkeydown = function(e)
      var key;
      if (window.event) key = event.keyCode
      else
      var unicode = e.keyCode ? e.keyCode : e.charCode
      key = unicode
      switch (key)
      { //event.keyCode
      case 116: //F5 button
        LSAPI.sessionPlugin.logoff();
      event.returnValue = false;
      key = 0; //event.keyCode = 0;
      return false;
      case 82: //R button
      if (event.ctrlKey)
    LSAPI.sessionPlugin.logoff();
      event.returnValue = false;
      key = 0; //event.keyCode = 0;
      return false;
      case 91: // ctrl + R Button
    LSAPI.sessionPlugin.logoff();
      event.returnValue= false;
      key=0;
      return false;
    Thanks.
    But i am unable to control the multiple windows opening the browser.So any one can tell me the how to block the new window and new tab/duplicate tab option.
    BR,
    Durga Rao.

  • Not able to edit the value options in LKM

    Hi
    I have recently upgraded to ODI 11g .
    In that we are not able to edit the value options in LKM.
    (i.e.. editor window is not appearing, not able to edit the text.
    Please let me know the solution .
    Thanks

    We were using JDK1.6.0_29 and it was not supporting ODI 11.1.1.5, so we have uninstalled the JDK1.6.0_29 and reinstall the JDK1.6.0_11.This solves our issue.
    Thanks a lot!!

  • Restrict the user should not allow to select No Excise entry tab in MIGO

    Hi
    how to restrict the user should not allow to select No Excise entry tab in MIGO
    if the material Excisable user can bale to select the No Excise entry tab in MIGO . my requirement .... if the Pop come Please enter Excise Invoice number and Excise Invoice Date user should not change the No Excise how to restrict pls advise me
    @sakhi

    These are the options provided by SAP keeping in mind Indian Scenario. Sometimes, vendor forget to send excise invoice copy with the material, in such case, you can select 'Only Part I'.
    Even if you have maintain vendor excise details & material excise details (By mistake) in J1ID, system will throw an error message, excise invoice value is zero. In such case, we can select option 'No excise entry'.
    Your requirement can't be fulfilled in standard way. Even if you go for any Z- developement, you will lose the option.

  • Sales order should not be abled to be changed

    Sales order should not be abled to be changed after creating and confirming to the customer. What needs to be done?

    Hi kishore
    1) after creating the sales order   we are gong to send  confirmation through output determinatin output type (BA00) .
    2) once the customer confirms the  order based on thet we do the delivery. right----
    3) see exmple : a person who creates the order he does'nt have rights to change in big industry lot of departments (so many managers) has to see the order because  the order canbe  one item it can be 1000 items.
    4) every body will be having certain limitations like authorisations if you take my company i don't have authorisations to do FI settings or MM settings.
    5) what means to say is if  that order has to be changed ababrs might have written the code the moment the order confirms from the customers it's goes to respective department or managers through work flow if it goes any manager , a person who created the order he can't do any changes on that. that's why business works. that is  what SAP
    i hope you have under stood
    thanks
    surya

  • User should not release the PR which is created by him

    Hi
    We didnu2019t use work flow functionality for PR Release. So same user can create PR and release the same PR in our system. Our requirement is user should not release the PR which is created by him. I would like to put this control in system.
    How can I achieve this requirement?
    Thanks
    Jeny

    Hi Ravi
    Thanks for your reply. but they need to have authroization for PR release . bec they are eligble to release PR as per delegation of authroity. but they should not release their own PR . they can relase other's PR within their level.
    Jeny.

Maybe you are looking for

  • MBP constant crashing and one very upset wife HELP PLEASE

    Well I am at my wits end and I need some help, I am running a MBP, 10.7.1, stock everything, I have not upgraded RAM or HDD I went out of town about 8 weeks ago and when I came back, tried to turn on my mac and it wouldn't come on.  I finally lion cl

  • Need help connecting new HDTV to an old 5.1 speaker system

    I have an old Creative 5.1 speaker system that I want to connect to my new HDTV, and I am not sure how to do it in a way that preserves the 5.1 surround sound. My new TV only has two options for audio out: 1. Optical/TOSLINK 2. 3.5 mm jack (labeled "

  • URGENT ADVICE Needed on XRAID

    Guys, I need advice. Q1. Can I connect XServe with single fibre channel cable to XRAID (RAID50), example upper controller and will it show me the full volume? Q2. Can I connect two XRAIDs with one XServe on single fibre channel card or do I need to i

  • LaCie desktop manager wont run in lion

    Hi I have just purchased a new 1TB LaCie D2 Quadra External hard drive and connected it  by Firewire 800 to my 27" iMac. I am aware of some compatibility issues, and the setup assistant would'nt run on Lion and you have to reformat manually, which I

  • LR 4.0 and OS 10.5

    Hello- i just recieved my upgrade for LR 4.0. I noticed OS 10.6 or 10.7 is in the specs. Can it work on 10.5.8? Thanks, John