Using Advanced routing Rules : Rule based

HI all,
how to use advance rule based routing rules in Human task...
can any one share some POC or sample doc with screen shots on this..
Thanks ,
Karthik

Hello Karthik -
Please check this URL for Advanced rules :
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E13154_01/bpm/docs65/studio/index.html?t=modules/dynamic_business_rules/t_Advanced_Editor_Mode.html
For more details :
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E13154_01/bpm/docs65/studio/index.html?t=modules/dynamic_business_rules/c_Head_Business_Rules_Editor.html
BR,
Justin

Similar Messages

Is it possible to update the human task payload without using worklist API but only using advance routing rule.

Hi,
I have one human tasks in BPEL process in which i am using different stages and with using advance routing rules i am routing my task payload to one stage to another.My payload has Task Status and Branch,after approving the human task from first stage I want to send modified value of the Task Status to the next stage without using worklist API or manual updation but only using the advance routing rules,is it possible ??? If anyone have any idea about this than please enlight me with your valuable solutions and advices...
Thanx
Regards
Ajral

Hi SamGoe,
According to your description, my understanding is that you want to update the PoerPoint slide from SharePoint 2010 slide library automatically.
It seems to be not necessary to use Macros. SharePoint provides an OOB way to notify you to check for update to the slide library slides when you open the presentation. PowerPoint does this because you selected the option
Tell me when this slide changes when you copied the slides from the library.
More information, please refer to the link below:
http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/powerpoint-help/sharepoint-slide-libraries-ii-use-slides-in-the-library-RZ010254089.aspx?section=6
I hope this helps.
Thanks,
Wendy
Wendy Li
TechNet Community Support

Limitations on Using Human Task advance routing rules and stages

In one of our requirement we have used human task with different number of stages (14 stages ) and for all this we are using only one human task component and to route the task through different stages I am using advance routing rules (30 rules),we have exposed this through bpel .My code is working fine .
My question is:-
1- Do this kind of design contain flaws, is there is any restriction on using of number of stages and number of routing rules. Is there is any best practise which suggests that we cannot have more than certain number of stages or routing rules..??
2-Is it feasible to use different human task component for each of the human task stages and route the data using business rule, but that will be very exhausted and unnecessarily making bpel heavier, also the front end people will be having more number of bpm urls which will make their work tedious.
Please suggest .
Thank you

This doesn't sound good. That's an EJB internal to BPEL if I'm not mistaken. Did the install go ok? Has this ever worked before?
I'd check the logs on startup for any sign of an exception. This may be the symptom of a problem which will be logged on startup.
Also, search metalink and open an SR -- this EJB isn't something you need to configure in a normal install -- at least not that I'm familiar with.

Rules-based GATP with sales BOM

Hi,
with reference to the following thread which asks the same question, but although in "answered" status, actually contains no answer to the final question...
GATP Question
We are investigating the possibility of using GATP with rules-based ATP to propose a sourcing plant. The result of this is of course a subitem in the sales order.
My question is, is there any restriction to using the sales BOM with rules-based ATP? We use the sales BOM currently to insert the packaging items into the sales order. From a previous project, I have in the back of my mind that there was a restriction in this respect, and that with the subitem from the GATP result, it was not possible to explode the sales BOM.
I cannot find what I recall to be the explicit SAP-help statement in this respect. Anybody with experience in this?
Regards,
Douglas

The current situation is as follows:
We have the saleable product A in plants X and Y, with a sales BOM in each of the plants, for the packaging items B and C. When product A is entered in the sales order in, say, plant X, the sales BOM is exploded and items B and C are inserted into the sales order. ATP is done in R/3, and if there is no availability in X, then the plant can be manually changed to Y, but each of the subitems from the sales BOM must also be manually changed to Y.
Desired to be situation:
We implement GATP, with a rule to subsitute plant X with plant Y in the event that plant X has no stock. So the desired system response is: enter item A in the sales order with plant X, GATP subsitutes plant X with plant Y and generates a subitem for product A in plant Y. Now the sales BOM is exploded for the new subitem, generating the further subitems for B and C, also in plant Y.
Is this possible?

WRT54G Advanced Routing

I currently have a WRT54G as a Gateway to my network. The ISP connection plugs into the WAN port, and then the WRT54G plugs into a switch, and all other computers plug into the switch. The router's internal address is 192.168.1.1 /24 and all computers get a DHCP address from the WRT54G from 192.168.1.50-150 /24.
I am putting in a Sonicwall (I will give it address 192.168.1.2) and want the WRT54G to use the Sonicwall as the Gateway; that is, plug the ISP into the Sonicwall, and connect the Sonicwall to the WRT54G, and all other connections remain the same. I know I have to use Advanced Routing to switch from Gateway to Router mode, but I am unsure what the other settings should be (RIP, Select Set Number, Destination LAN IP, etc.) The WRT54G must remain in the network. How can I make this work?

Thanks for replying, but I'm hoping to get some help with this problem. The device needs to be in the chain, and I have done it before, so I know it can work, but sadly, I did not document how I made it work =/
"I currently have a WRT54G as a Gateway to my network. The ISP connection plugs into the WAN port, and then the WRT54G plugs into a switch, and all other computers plug into the switch. The router's internal address is 192.168.1.1 /24 and all computers get a DHCP address from the WRT54G from 192.168.1.50-150 /24.
I am putting in a Sonicwall (I will give it address 192.168.1.2) and want the WRT54G to use the Sonicwall as the Gateway; that is, plug the ISP into the Sonicwall, and connect the Sonicwall to the WRT54G, and all other connections remain the same. I know I have to use Advanced Routing to switch from Gateway to Router mode, but I am unsure what the other settings should be (RIP, Select Set Number, Destination LAN IP, etc.) The WRT54G must remain in the network. How can I make this work?"

Rule-Based Optimizer doesn4t use the index

Does anybody know why the rule-based optimizer doesn4t use the index of all columns in the where clause?
I have a select that use the hint RULE to force the optimizer to work in rule mode and also one index to all columns used in the where clause. Analyzing the execution plan (EXPLAIN PLAN) I observed the optimizer accesses all tables, but one, using the index. There4s one table (the first of the execution plan) that is accessed using a Full Table Scan (FTS).
I've rebuilt the index for this table, but the execution plan doesn4t change.
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance.
Eliane.

Hi. Oracle may not use an index if it finds that a full table scan is quicker/more efficient. Try the hint /*+ INDEX (table index) */ and compare the query performance with that of the one without this hint. (As you know, if you force Rule-based approach, the COST column in EXPLAIN PLAN output will not be populated. You may have to use trace/tkprof.)

Using Decision Service for existing rules based on Java Fact

Hello
According The BPEL Process Manager developers guid (10.1.3.1) page 18-28 if we want to call existing ruleset from BPEL that it's based on java facts . We should write RL function and convert xml data into java and assert the facts and after retrieving the result we should set the data from java types into xml types. From BPEL we should call this function
But I have question : We know that rules based on java facts has better performance than xml facts , Instead of Using Decicion Service , we have writen java function and run ruleset and then we have exposed this as a webservice and invoke it from BPEL.
What is the performance difference if we use this way instead of Decision Services?

Thank you ralf
So I want to write an RL Function and call my ruleset (based on my Java facts) from this RL Function and then Call this RL Function from BPEL decicion services.
I have problem : I want to generate XSD that match with my JavaFact A . How can I easily create XSD from my java fact class.? I saw http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=3221 that shows how we can create xsd from Java classes . I could generate XSD from Java class A by the recommended method.
I have Class A that contains member B as an array of objects (C) , My problem is that When I import generated xsd into rule Author it's generated JAXB class does not generate member B as an array of class(C)
Is there any way that I can modify class A into JAXB compatible class and generate xsd file from it's JAXB class .
I don't know JAXB specification and I do not know how JAXB works.I want easily generate JAXB class form my java class A and then retrieve corresponding xsd from it .
Can I do such thing?

How can I know the database is using Cost Based or Rule Based?

Hi all expertise,
How can I know the database is using Cost Based or Rule Based?
If cost based it is using, what methods are need to use to minimize the cost when database is running? And which tables I can see the performance of the database?
Thanks
Amy

how to see database setting ?
use this
SQL> sho parameter optimizer
NAME TYPE VALUE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling integer 1
optimizer_features_enable string 9.2.0
optimizer_index_caching integer 0
optimizer_index_cost_adj integer 100
optimizer_max_permutations integer 2000
optimizer_mode string CHOOSE
choose means if table statistics is available then it will use cost
else
use rule based optimizer
for seeing performnace of table use
set autotrace on
and run your query
if it doen't show cost.it means it use rule based
for using cost based
u will calculate table statistics
9i
dbms_stats.gather_table_stats('owner','table');
8i
analyze table <table_name> compute statistics;
hope it will help you
kuljeet pal singh

Use of filters and aggregations based on hierarchy nodes in an update rule

Hello,
I need to calculate some indicators from a ODS (BW 3.5) that contain raw data to another one that will contain indicators. These figures are the results of the use of filters and aggregations based on hierarchy nodes (for example: all sales accounts under a node).
In fact, this is typically a query but I want to store these figures, so I need
I understood I have to use a start routine. I never did that before.
Could you provide me with easy-to-understand-for-newbies examples of:
- filtering data based on the value of an infoobject (value must be empty, for example)
- filtering and aggregation of data based on the appartenance to hierarchy nodes (all sales figures, ....)
- aggregation of the key figures based on different characteristics after filtering of these
Well, I am asking a lot ...
Thank you very much
Thomas

Please go through the following link to learn more on aggregates:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e55aaca6-0301-0010-928e-af44060bda32
Also go through the very detailed documentation:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/67efb9bb-0601-0010-f7a2-b582e94bcf8a
Regards,
Mahesh

Implementing roles and rules based authorisation with Azure AD

Hi all,
I would greatly appreciate some input on feasibility and patterns I should look at for a complex technical requirement that I am currently tasked with designing.
We have a system that comprises a web and mobile app. In the past we have implemented session based authentication through ADAM and authorisation through custom business rules contained within the applications. The authentication mechanism is in the process
of being migrated to Azure AD and authorisation is planned to be moved to Azure AD for our next release.
Existing authorisation within our web application is already complex. We have users that belong to different groups with a range of permissions such as read, write or admin. Additionally each user is granted access to N customers and also N locations within
each customer. We have a requirement that any number of combinations of customers and locations be supported. Users also need to have different permissions for each entity, i.e. read access to customer 1 location 2, write access to customer 4 and administer
customer 7. Currently these privileges are maintained within a relational database and enforced as part of each PageLoad(). Essentially this is a combination of roles and rules based authorisation.
We are struggling to represent this complex matrix structure within Azure AD and efficiently implement the authorisation decision in Azure AD. The driver for this technical requirement is to provide re-usability of the authorisation component to other (as
yet unidentified) applications.
Currently the best option we have come up with is implementing custom attributes for each class of permissions and storing within this 2048 bit field a bitmask that represents whether this permission is granted for a given location (which has a many to one
relationship with customer).
Any help or comment would be gratefully received,
Phil

Hi
When "Advance routing" is used for Task assignment; the task service asserts the folllowing fact types : Task, PreviousOutcome and TaskAction to the rules engine. These facts gives all the reqd info about the task (like outcome of the participant, task stage .. etc)
Now in the defined ruleset; we can have rules as per our requirement that can extract info from the asserted fact types and assign task to the required/next participant.
Also note that we write the advance rules for exception cases only.
For example; let's say all participants have 2 possible Outcomes [COMPLETE, RECHECK]. We have defined the ideal task routing flow as :
Participant A -> Participant B -> Participant C. This is the flow when all participant selects "COMPLETE"
Now suppose B selects outcome as "RECHECK" then the task shld move back to A. So for this case only we need to write a advance rule.
Pls refer to the code sample at : http://download.oracle.com/technology/sample_code/hwf/workflow-106-IterativeDesign.zip
Also dev guide : refer to section 28.3.7.2 http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E14571_01/integration.1111/e10224/bp_hwfmodel.htm#BABBFEJJ
Thanks
Edited by: Kania on May 19, 2010 2:41 AM

BRF+ Routing Rule not showing Expression

Hi Experts,
I am trying to create a BRF+ routing rule (line item by line item) within SAP Standard Process ID - SAP_GRAC_ACCESS_REQUEST
The purpose is to use it as a detour based upon Role attributes. Although the rule is generated in ABAP screen, when I try to modify BRF+ rule, the Expression where decision table is located, not coming up.
When I test it, it gives error - Expression not set.
What could be the issue? Need your help.
Thanks & Regards,
Sabita

Hi Sabita,
Definitely look up those courses! I'm an instructor for them in the UK and these sorts of questions are exactly those which most people ask on the courses!
GRFN_MW_S_ROUTING is a structure which contains those two fields. This should be the Result Data Object which will then automatically place those two fields as the results.
The Condition columns are user driven inputs where you give the criteria for the routing rules e.g. Business process or role criticality etc.
For routing rules or initiator rules, there are two sources for the information; the request header (attributes of the request) or the request line items (attributes of the roles on the request). There are some fields which may exist in both (e.g. Business process for the access request or the business process assigned to the Role) which explains why there are duplicates in the list. When selecting the conditions, scroll right to the bottom of the list and you'll find the Structures which show Header or Line Item. If you expand those, then you will see the list of fields again. By doing this, you'll know whether you're looking at the header or line item field.
Select the appropriate fields as the columns and then add in the rows to identify the specific criteria.

Questions on Rules-Based ATP and Purchase Requisitions for STOs

Hello experts,
We are working on rules-based ATP configuration and have several questions about the functionality. Iu2019m hoping that some of you are using this functionality and can help give us direction.
In our environment we have multiple distribution centers and multiple manufacturing plants. We want to confirm sales orders against stock and production orders in any of those plants, depending on the locations that have stock or planned production. For example, we will place a sales order against plant A. If there is not enough stock in plant A then rules-based ATP will use location determination to check in plant B, then C. The scope of check on the ATP check will include stock and released production orders. We will configure plant A as the u201Cconsolidation locationu201D so if stock is found in plants B or C then stock transport orders will automatically be created to move the stock to plant A before shipping to the customer.
We have configured rules-based ATP and this functionality is working well in our Development system. The ATP check is executed and uses the rules-based ATP to find eligible stock in other plants. The system is also creating purchase requisitions to move the stock to the consolidation plant.
Our first concern is that there doesnu2019t appear to be any firm linkage between the sales order and the resulting purchase requisition. For example, if we create sales order 123 for plant A and the rules-based ATP finds stock in plant B it automatically creates a purchase requisition 987 to move the stock from plant B to plant A. However, there doesnu2019t appear to be a linkage between sales order 123 and purchase requisition 987. For instance, if we delete sales order 123 the purchase requisition doesnu2019t get deleted.
Our second concern is that the quantity on the purchase requisition can still be confirmed against later sales orders. For example, say the above scenario resulted in a purchase requisition 987 that consumed all the stock available in plant B. We then create a second sales order 456 for the same product. Plant A is out of stock so the rules-based ATP looks in plant B. We would expect that plant B would also not have any stock because itu2019s all been consumed by the purchase requisition. Instead, the system creates a second purchase requisition to move quantity from plant B to plant A. Itu2019s as if the system doesnu2019t realize that the purchase requisition 987 is already planning to move stock out of plant B.
Does anyone have any thoughts or suggestions on these two scenarios? Is there a way to configure the system so there is a hard linkage between the sales order and the purchase requisition so that if the sales order is deleted then the purchase requisition is also deleted? Should ATP realize that purchase orders are consuming inventory and not allow later sales orders to confirm against that same inventory? Any advice or experience would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
David Eady
Application Delivery Team Lead
Propex, Inc.

Hi,
The scheduling is done in SCM, and from there, whenever the RBA is triggered, the calculation is done always with the old route in SCM. Until you get back to R/3 this is when your route is determined. But the ATP check is always with the original route. So the idea would be that you change the values of the route while still in APO, this is possible via the user exit. Should be done in scheduling in APO.
Hope this information is helpful.
Regards,
Tibor

Incoming email - Routing rules on exchange server 2003

I am configuring SAP system to receive emails as per note 455140. We currently have only one client and have updated necessary profile parameters including setting SMTP port to 25 for incoming mails. We have specified our enterprise exchange server 2003 as the mail server in SCOT transaction and are able to send out emails from SAP without issues, but cannot receive emails in SAP.
Following note 607108, I am able to receive emails in the SAP system using telnet test (by passing mail server), thereby I believe all relevant configuration settings in SAP system have been correctly maintained. Now, if I try to send an email to SAP user from another SAP system or Microsoft Outlook or Internet, these emails are not being received in SAP. No inbound traces are generated in SAP since the mail has not been received by SAP.
As part of the config, our server admins have set up a rule on mail server to forward specific emails to SAP system. Does anyone have any insight into what might be the issue here? Also, if someone can provide links/directions on how to setup routing rules on exchange server 2003 to forward specific requests to SAP system (I believe this is where our issue is).
Thanks!
Fahad

Hello Markus,
By specific, I meant emails addressed to specific users need to be forwarded to SAP. Instead of specifying *ATcompany.com --> WebASHost:25000, we put in a rule userATcompany.com --> WebASHost:25000
Based on your response, I asked SAP support whether there is such restriction when SU01 email address and exchange email address are same, exchange will not forward to SAP. Below is there response
"SAPconnect like most mail platforms route mails via the email address.
SAP recommends the following:-
UserATClient.SID.company.com
I know that a DNS entry will have to be written for this to be routed
to your Exchange server for relay into SAP.
The only other recommendation is to use the local part of the mail
address to route the mails. This will not require an external DNS
entry but every new user will have to be updated in Exchange.
User.client.sidATcompany.com
There are no other way of correctly routing mails other than these
methods. Thank you."
Now SAP says when email addresses are same and if we put in a rule based on local part of the mail, it should still forward.
Since the issue is through exchange, SAP will not provide further support to resolve this and we cannot go with sub-domains currently due to business requirements.
Any suggestions.
Thanks,
Fahad

Partitioning on Oracle 8i (Rule Based vs. Cost Based)

At my current engagement, we are using Oracle Financials 11.0.3 on Oracle 8.0.6. The application uses rule-based optimizer. The client wants to implement Oracle partitioning. With this in mind, we are concerned about possible performance issues that the implementation of partitioning may cause since RBO does not recognize it.
We agree that the RBO will see a non-partitioned table the same as a partitioned. In this scenario where you gain the most is with backup/recoverability and general maintenance of the partitioned table.
Nevertheless, we have a few questions:
When implementing partitions, will the optimizer choose to go with Cost base vs. Rule base for these partitioned tables?
Is it possible that the optimizer might get confused with this?
Could it degrade performance at the SQL level?
If this change from RBO to CBO does occur, the application could potential perform poorly because of the way it has been written.
Please provide any feedback.
Thanks in advance.

If the CBO is invoked when accessing these tables, you may run into problems.
- You'll have to analyze your tables & ensure that the statistics are kept up to date.
- It's possible that any SQL statements which invoke the CBO rather than the RBO will have different performance characteristics. The SYSTEM data dictionary tables, for example, must use the RBO or their performance suffers dramatically. Most of the time, the CBO beats the RBO, but applications which have been heavily tuned with the RBO may have problems with the CBO.
- Check your init.ora to see what optimizer mode you're in. If you're set to CHOOSE, the CBO will be invoked whenever statistics are available on the table(s) involved. If you choose RULE, you'll only invoke the CBO when the RBO encounters situations it doesn't have rules for.
Justin

How to setup a routing rule for a specific file type for the content organizer?

Hello,
how can I set a routing rule for a specific file type, for example for "pdf" or for "docx", for my content organizer?
As standard I can only choose for the rules the content type, name and title of the file uploaded.
Thank you in advance!
JohnyG

Hi Johny,
Based on your description, my understanding is that you want to create a routing rule for a specific file type.
I recommend to create rules with the conditions as the image below shows for the Document content type(for example: .docx files):
Best regards.
Thanks
Victoria Xia
TechNet Community Support

Using Advanced routing Rules : Rule based

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for