Validation by mapping in BPM

I need to validate an object. I plan to add trasformation step and exception handler for it.
Will XI validate data (after mapping) by XMLSchema?
For example I added constraint maxLengh=10.
Will transformation step throw an exception if length > 10?

Hi Sergey
Please check out this weblog entry written by myself on the topic of XML Schema validation in XI:
<a href="/people/morten.wittrock/blog/2006/03/21/validating-messages-in-xi-using-xml-schema">/people/morten.wittrock/blog/2006/03/21/validating-messages-in-xi-using-xml-schema</a>
Cheers,
Morten Wittrock

Similar Messages

1:N Mapping without BPM - Inbound Structure

Hello,
I know that a 1:N Mapping without BPM should be possible with newer releases. I tried to do so and set the occurences in the signature tab of message mapping to 1:N.
However the problem I am facing right now is that a new <Messages> element is wrapped around the source structure. So the incoming message is not valid anymore and therefore the target structure is empty. How should this be handled? Does the source system need to add a new <messages> root element or is ccBPM not avoidable in my case?
Thank you!

Hi Guppenberger,
I understand your doing 1:N mapping without BPM.
There is no need to added the message wrapper when you are testing your scenario end to end. But if you are testing your message mapping alone, wrapper is required in test tab of Message Mapping. Please refer this blow [Link|/people/ranga.rajan2/blog/2010/03/17/multi-mapping-with-a-simple-scenario--fledgling-kit ], have a look at payload screenshot. I suggest you to check you payload (for end to end testing) and mapping logic again.
Regards,
Raghu_Vamsee

Error/Warning while validating a mapping

I'm using OWB version 9.2 and database 9i.
I have few major problems in OWB. We have stage and star schemas on the same database instance. The source system is on a different database instance. There are database links created between target instance to source.
I have about 20 mappings; all validated, deployed and executed successfully about 2 weeks back.
Beginning of this week I logged on to OWB and tried to make some changes to one of the mappings. Before I made changes I tried to validate the mapping and I got following warnings:
"VLD-1008: Referenced mapping column <COLUMN_NAME> does not exist"
"VLD-1003: Reference <COLUMN_NAME> between mapping object and repository object does not exist".
When I click on "View Details" it says I need to reconcile outbound of the staging table.
When I have not made any changes to the mapping why do I need to do this? I want to know under what circumstances do we get this message?
Another weird thing is I validated the mapping, after 15 minutes I tried to deploy this and still got the above warnings, although I had reconciled outbound and successfully validated the mapping. Am I missing something here?
Another problem is I have a mapping which loads a dimension from staging table. Very simple basic mapping all it does is dumps from staging table to dimension and key is generated by sequence generator. Both stage and star schemas are on the same database instance. When I try to validate this mapping it gives me error:
"VLD-2769: Database link is not allowed for data target <DIMENSION_NAME>" and when I click view details it shows following:
"Loading of data across database link is not supported. Deploy this mapping within the same database instance as the actual target and remove the database link access specification from the physical configuration of this data target operator."
I have not specified any database link or schema name in the mapping configuration; both stage and star schemas are on same instance. Although there are two instances that it works fine. First if I provide the schema name in the mapping configuration it gives me warning but deploys and executes fine. Secondly if I go to deployment manager, select the mapping and click deploy it validates successfully. Why do I get this error when I validate in the mapping editor?
I never had these problems before; all the mappings were validated, deployed and executed successfully.
I would like to know where/what could have gone wrong? Could any of you point me in the right direction? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks

hi.
ok look i also had this errors:
"VLD-1008: Referenced mapping column <COLUMN_NAME> does not exist"
"VLD-1003: Reference <COLUMN_NAME> between mapping object and repository object does not exist".
this errors could be due to that something has change in the source database, in this case could be that somebody change the name column since the last time you did the load.
A possible solution is that you open the mapping (edit) and reconcile the tables both the table "from"(where the table came) and the table "to"(the table destination).
ooh and check the source system for any table that has changed, if it changed, so you have to load again the table.
bye

Error VLD-1108 while validating the mapping in owb 11g

Hi All,
I am using owb 11.1.0.7.0. I am new to owb 11g. I am getting the following error while validating the mapping
error: VLD-1108 . Operator requires more input or output connections in order to generate mapping code.
I am using a function as operator and mapping it with the table.
Please tell me the solution for this. Its urgent
Thanks in advance,
Siva

Hi,
u must be using a procedure or table function that is called in the mapping for execution. When writing the function u would have specified 3 inputs but in the mapping u would have given only 2. check the number of inputs and make sure they match.
Regards
Bharadwaj Hari

Duplicate Message ID issue in case of Multi mapping (without BPM)

Hi Experts,
I am doing one sample Example for my requirement of converting the single source message data into the multiple Target messages.
for example, when sender system is sending the 5 sale order details into a single message in PI then my Inbound proxy class of ECC R/3 receiver system must get this sale orders separately, that means inbound proxy class method must be triggered separately for 5 sale orders from sender system. for achieving this, I have used the Multi mapping concept in ESR (without BPM).
This scenario is in Asynchronous mode.
The below screen shots give the details on what I have configures so far.
IN ESR
IN ID
IN SXMB_MONI of PI
IN SXMB_MONI of ECC R/3 Receiver system (Error in Processing)
due to this error, inbound Proxy class method is not being triggered for the single Sale order details as well,
please let me know how to tackle this duplicate message ID issue when we have multiple payloads to process in a single message.
please also let me know if is there any other workaround to fulfil this requirement.
Thank you,
Regards,
Jagesh

Hi Nunu,
Check the below blog for restrictions.
Multi-Mapping without BPM - Yes, it’s possible!
Restrictions
Messages that result from the split in a mapping-based message split are sent using one AE. So only adapters running on the AE are supported. In particular, this means that target IDOC message splits are not supported since the IDOC adapter is not part of the AE.
Regards,
Praveen.

Multi-Mapping without BPM

Hi ,
I am following this weblog
/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
but stuck up with what are the fields contained by ID in target message2 ...
Please check this for your clarification
http://www.flickr.com/photos/11212307@N08/1135395357/
Thanks
dushanth

ID will have only ID under it. instead of creating flat structure like the one above Jin has changed the strucutre below . you will have only ID field in it or you want u can add other fields in it .
Regards
Sreeram.G.Reddy

Different options for message mapping in BPM

Hey guys
i m in the learning phase of BPM and am kinda confused with the different ways we can do message mapping in a BPM scenario.
first of all we can do message mapping before BPM,we can also do after BPM and lastly we can do inside BPM(ofcurse this is not recommended as its too resource consuming)
i have bene through starters blog on BPM by Krishna moorthy and Arpit seth,and now am wondering how to use the mapping in diff. ways
suppose i m doing a simple File to File with BPM(just for practise purpose)
now here is what i have designed in IR
DT_sender_File DT_receiver_File
MT_sender_File MT_receiver_File
MI_Outbound_sender(async,outbound), MI_Inbound_receiver(async,inbound)
AI_sender(abstract,async) AI_receiver(abstract,async)
MM_File_File(using MT_sender_File and MT_receiver_File)
now i want to clear some doubts about interface mapping.my understanding is
if i do interface mapping between MI_Outbound_sender and AI_receiver,this will be interface mapping before BPM.
if i do interface mapping between AI_sender and MI_Inbound_receiver,this will be interafce mapping after BPM
and if i do interface mapping between AI_sender and AI_receiver then it will be mapping inside BPM.
is my understanding correct?if yes,then does that means we can we any of the above mapping in our scenario.(if we dont consider the performance issue as of now)
thanx
saif

Hi Saif,

is my understanding correct?
Yes, thts correct
if yes,then does that means we can we any of the above mapping in our scenario
Of course, u can use any of them (overlooking the performance issue)
Regards,
Prateek

N:1 mapping without BPM

Hi All,
Is it possible to do N:1 mapping without BPM in PI 7.1 ?
Thanks and regards
Uma

Hi,
>Yeah, It is possible.
how can it be possible based on ANY requirement ?
you just cannot receive many messages into PI and bundle them into
one without BPM - and this is final
can you tell the way if you know how to do it without a BPM
in any (even very specific) scenario ?
thanks,
Regards,
Michal Krawczyk

Error: 1:n multi-mapping using BPM for file to file scenario

Hi. Iu2019m trying to do 1:n multi-mapping using bpm scenario. I use file to file. Input file consists of many records and then I want many record to be transformed into many file at target system. I follow step in http://www.riyaz.net/blog/xipi-1n-multi-mapping-using-bpm/. However, I have a problem when file is retrieved in to XI. It doesnu2019t create any output file.
When I look at SXMB_MONI, it shows u201CNo object type found for the message Check that the corresponding process is activated.u201D Besides, it shows error message "Unable to perform action for selected message" when i clikc at PE in SXMB_MONI.
I have check at many previous posts with the same error message but still couldnu2019t solve it. I already activate my BPM and check that status in SXI_CACHE = 0. There is noting left in change list of my IR and ID.
Here is my design and configuration.
IR
Data Type: DT_file_split -> for both input and output file
Message Type: MT_file_split_sender, MT_file_split_receiver
Message Interface: SI_file_split_in, SI_file_split_out, SI_file_abs_source, SI_file_abs_target
Message mapping: MM_file_split for mapping MT_file_split_sender with MT_file_split_receiver
Interface mapping: OM_file_split
u2022 Source = SI_file_split_out
u2022 Target = SI_file_split_in
u2022 Mapping Program = MM_file_split
BPM following this link http://www.riyaz.net/blog/xipi-1n-multi-mapping-using-bpm/.
ID
Import my Integration process
2 Communication Channel for getting input file (CC_File_split_sender) and creating output file (CC_File_split)
2 Receiver determination:
u2022 Source system to BPM using interface SI_File_Abs_source
u2022 BPM to target system using interface SI_File_Abs_target
1 Interface determination:
u2022 from source system to BPM
u2022 Sender interface: SI_File_Split_Out
u2022 Receiver interface: SI_file_abs_source
1 Sender Agreement
u2022 Commu. Component: Source System
u2022 Using interface: SI_File_Abs_source
u2022 Sender Communication Channel: CC_File_Split_Sender
1 Receiver Agreement
u2022 Sender Communication Component: BPM
u2022 Receiver Communication Component: Target System
u2022 Receiver Interface: SI_File_Split_In
u2022 Receiver Communication Channel: CC_File_Split
Anyone know how to fix this?
Thanks,
Pavin

Hi,
Yes, thats the problem.
You are creating file from test tab of 1..N mapping .
In case of 1..N mappping in mapping Extra tags of messages are addded to the data.As shown here:-
Messages
 Message1
 MessageType
When you use this mapping to generate xml message then it will add additional tags for <Messages> and <Message1>, which is not correct. it should only have structure of you MT.
So remove start and end tag of <Messages> and <Message1> from your data file. Mentioned below in bold.
<xml......>
<Messages>
<Message1>
<MT_...>
</MT_...>
</Message1>
</Messages>
This should solve your problem.
Regards,
Sami.

1:N mapping without BPM ( Idoc Receiver)

Hi,
I have a scenario like 1:N, source would be JMS and the receiver side have two Idocs with the same business system. based on one Item segment value, I need to route the input JMS message to corresponding receiver IDoc.
INput Structure:
Record
Header 1..1
H1
H2
H3
Item 1..Unbounded
I1
I2
I3
NOte: Based on value I2, I need to route the message to corresponding receiver Idoc. like If I2=A then Idoc1 and I2=B then Idoc2. Can we achieve the same without using BPM?
-Esha

Hi,
This can be achieved with Interface Determination conditions. Go for 2 mapping. And in Interface Determination put condition to check which mapping to use. No need of ccBPM.
If you still want to go for 1:N multimapping please refer link:
/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
without BPM.
Regards,
Vineetha.
Edited by: Vineetha on Apr 27, 2010 11:44 AM

The question about Interface Mapping in BPM

Hello,
I am a few confused about an Interface Mapping in BPM at the Design step.
I have a task to transmit and trasform two messages of two sender file adapter to two IDOCs messages and then to send them to SAP system.
I use BPM.
But I don't understand what types of message interfaces should I use for source and target interfaces in Interface Mapping? As to the target interface I understand it must be abstract but which of interfaces exactly?
Actually there are some questions here:
1) If the source interface should be abstract or real in Interface Mapping?
2) If the target interface should be the abstract interface of Receive Step object or the abstract interface of Send Step object?
3) And what the message types should I use for the source and target message interfaces in Interface Mapping? If I understand correctly that these message types

hi igor,
you have to import the IDOC Types under the imported objects in the integration repository objects,
what are all the data that coming out from the file adapter, you design the datatype.
the target IDOC should be real and you do the mapping for the all necessary fields.
refer: --
File to IDOC:
Re: how to Sending XML data to idoc
IDOC Mapping:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm40/helpdata/en/77/a1d48b1ce06d40932e0a26f3c117ce/frameset.htm

Error in Multi-mapping without BPM

Hi frnds,
I am doing a scenario File-XI-File. I am using the multi-splitting thing in the Message mapping. I have taken care of all the occurance's and "enhanced" thing in the IR and ID resp. I m using SP16. I want to avoid BPM.
But therez sme error cming up. When I check the MONI, its shwing "No messages created from split mapping" and when I test my interface using the Test Configuration in the ID, its shwing error in the Receiver Determination -- "HTTP connection to ABAP Runtime failed. Error: 403 Forbidden"
I have checked most of the blogs and forum suggestions. I have checked the ICF activations as well ...
So, do come back to me with your valuable suggestions, and I will award them points, if they really help me out.
Thanks and regards.
Neetesh

Hi Neetesh,

When I check the MONI, its shwing "No messages created from split mapping"
For this, Can you check the source XML. Does it contain Tags like <messages> .. If yes, you need to remove them from your source XML.
If i am right, you have copied the XML from the TEST tab of the message mapping and pasted it in a notepad and saved it without making any changes at all..... Just do as i have mentioned above and i am sure you will no more get that error message in your MONI....
Also go through this weblog which talks about multi-mapping without BPM,
/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
Regards,
Abhy

Message Mapping outside BPM

I often see a point from XI-Legends that a Message Mapping should be executed out side the BPM and that will make the XI performance good.
How to do a Message Mapping outside BPM? What does it mean?
Any Blog that narrates the above situation?
Thanks.

Data Types
Source/Sender Data Format ---     DT_Sender File
Target/Receiver Data Format --     DT_Receiver
Message Types
Sender Message Type - MT_SenderFile
Receiver Message Type - MT_ReceiverFile
Message Interface
MI_OB_Sender(Async, Outbound)            MI_IB_Receiver(Asynch,Inbound)
AI_Sender(Async, Abstract)                    AI_Receiver(Async,Abstract)
So
if the mappaing is done between
MI_OB_Sender       To   AI_Receiver           (Its Before BPM)
AI_Sender              To   MI_IB_Receiver      (Its After BPM)
AI_Sender              to AI_Receiver            (Its inside BPM)
Whether my understanding is correct? Thanks for your patience.

Multi-Mapping with BPM?

Hi Experts,
Can anyone send me a scenario which contains multi-mapping using BPM (collect pattern)........I searched on SDN but cudn't find any scenario which contains Multi-Mapping BPM scenarios. All the scenarios which r available based on without BPM.............points will given to the approriate replies.
Thanks in Advance
Faisal

Hey
strange you didn't find it,it was the second link when i searched SDN with the string "multimapping BPM"
/people/sudharshan.aravamudan/blog/2005/12/01/illustration-of-multi-mapping-and-message-split-using-bpm-in-sap-exchange-infrastructure
Thanx
Aamir

1:n mapping without BPM

Hello Friends,
I need some help about this mapping issue.
input file :
<SOAP:Envelope xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
 <SOAP:Header></SOAP:Header>
 <SOAP:Body>
 <Object_1>
 <ID>12222333444</ID>
 <points>50</points>
 </Object_1>
 <Object_1>
 <ID>12222333555</ID>
 <points>20</points>
 </Object_1>
 <Object_1>
 <ID>1222233777</ID>
 <points>10</points>
 </Object_1>
 </SOAP:Body>
</SOAP:Envelope>
output file1 :
<SOAP:Envelope xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
 <SOAP:Header></SOAP:Header>
 <SOAP:Body>
 <Object_1>
 <ID>12222333444</ID>
 <points>50</points>
 </Object_1>
 </SOAP:Body>
</SOAP:Envelope>
output file 2 :
<SOAP:Envelope xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
 <SOAP:Header></SOAP:Header>
 <SOAP:Body>
 <Object_1>
 <ID>12222333555</ID>
 <points>20</points>
 </Object_1>
 </SOAP:Body>
</SOAP:Envelope>
output file 3 :
<SOAP:Envelope xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
 <SOAP:Header></SOAP:Header>
 <SOAP:Body>
 <Object_1>
 <ID>1222233777</ID>
 <points>10</points>
 </Object_1>
 </SOAP:Body>
</SOAP:Envelope>
Best regards,
FK

I think you have not followed the blog properly for your requirement.
for example: Source File is like this.
<Records>
<FirstName>Sarvesh</FirstName>
<LastName>Singh</LastName>
<Dept>SAP</Dept>
<EmpID>12345</EmpID>
<Domain>technical conslultant</Domain>
<Experience>5 years</Experience>
</Records>
'N' Target Structure are
<Records>
<EmpName>
 <FirstName>Sarvesh</FirstName>
 <LastName>Singh</LastName>
</EmpName>
</Records>
<Records>
<EmpDetail>
 <Dept>SAP</Dept>
 <EmpID>12345</EmpID>
 <Domain>technical conslultant</Domain>
 <Experience>5 years</Experience>
<EmpDetail>
</Records>
So if you think your requirement is as per the above examples then follow /people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible blog.
Regards,
Sarvesh

Validation by mapping in BPM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for