Valuation In SRM

Hi Friends,
Could you plz let me the importance of the valuation in SRM and how. Also tell me the configuration part.
Reply highly appriciated... at the earliest
Ganesh

Hello,
Please refer the below link:
Difference in Direct and Indirect procurement
This will help you.
Regards,
Suneel Kumar

Similar Messages

Transfer of non-valuated materials from ECC to SRM

I kindly request your help with an issue that I am facing.
The scenario is as follows :
1. There is a non valuated material X (material type UNBW).
2. MRP run happens and generates a PR with account assignment U.
3. Transfer report BBP_EXTREQ_TRANSFER is executed in order to transfer the PR to SRM.
4. The PR reaches SRM, but the SC is not created instead in SLG1 there is an error thrown, "No account assignment exist. Enter an account assignment".
5. In the backend now If I try to change the PR i get the error " 6Q204 (Procurement profile 36 cannot be changed).
Is this scenario supported ?? i,e, transfer of non-valuated materials from ECC to SRM.
Kindly let me know if you have any idea on this.

Hi,
As per your query you have not determind accounts assignment. Please do these activity.
Please see the below link.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm30/helpdata/en/a9/cde93a2876a81ae10000000a11402f/content.htm
Regards,
Anil

SRM RFx Manual Valuation (Weighing) Functions

Hi Experts ,
We are using SRM7.0.
With SRM RFx, in Manual Valuation (Weighing) Functions / option , ONLY ONE person (Purchaser) can give /assigne score to the Attruibute /Answer given by Bidder.
In our scenarion, each Member of Bidding Panel/ Group gives different different Scores to Attruibute /Answer given by Bidder and then we find Average of the Score which is final.
i.e.
Purchaser 1 - Score 80
Purchaser 2 - Score 90
Purchaser 3 - Score 70
Totale Score of this Question shoule be calucatled by system as (809070) / 3 = 80 automatically .
Can in SRM RFx , multiple people from panel valute differently i.e. Valuation Factor/ Score to Attruibute /Answer given by Bidder and then system can make it Average of the Score automatically ?
Thnak you
Regards
NAP

From what I understand, what you want to average is the weight for the attribute. This requirement would not be trivial to implement, but you might be able to achieve it through implementation of BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI. I'd propose the following:
1. Precondition: all the purchasres that you would like to input their opinion MUST make changes to the RFx manually. Otherwise, you wouldn't be able to know their weight value on it. And your average weight(and later score) would be based ONLY on those who actually changed the RFx.
2. In the BADI implementation logic, you would want to manipulate the CT_WEIGHT parameter in the following fashion:
   a. find out the change document history of WEIGHT set including who changed it (look into tables CDPOS/CDHDR)
   b. when it comes to the same BADI logic with current purchaser's weight, take an average of all the weights entered by those in the weight's change document history, plus the current purchaser's weight value.
   c. change the new weight automatically to this new average value
Good luck.

How are valuation types handled in SRM

Hi SRM Gurus,
We have a back end ERP system which uses valuation type in Material accounting view. We are using Extended classic sceanrio and wanted to know if while PO create in SRM, based on the MM master data from ERP, can we have valuation types in SRM PO line items. I saw in BBP_PD transaction for a PO line item, there was a valuation type field BE_VAL_TYPE in table BBP_PDBEI.
Also wanted to know if Vendot and Plant jursidcition entered in MM - when replicated, where do they reside in SRM tables?
Will award points for replies found useful.
Thanks,

Ryan,
We wanted to use valuation types as well. Even though you have the BE_VAL_TYPE field, we didn't want to make a modification to allow the field to show on the screen. So, we created a customer field, appended to the appropriate structures and maintained methods in the BBP_DOC_CHECK_BADI, BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI, BBP_CREATE_BE_PO_NEW & BBP_CREATE_BE_RQ_NEW BADIs in order to process the field.
I hope that helps.
Regards, Dean.

GR non-valuated box automatically set in backend PO

Hi ...
I am doing extended classic scenario with SRM 5.0 and ECC 6.0 system,
When I create a purchase order with multiple account assignments in SRM then the "GR non-valuated" box is set automatically in backend PO when the PO is replicated in SAP. From other SDN threads, I could see that this is a standard design. But couldn't accept that as business might want to have valuated goods receipt with cost distribution.
Are there any solution to fix this issue? Please suggest. Thanks.

Hi
GR Non Valuated indicator comes from account assignment
Please check account assignment configuration
SPRO>MM>Purchasing>Account Assignment>maintain Acc Assignment
Select your Acc Assginment and go to details and check whether the GR Non Valuated is ticked or not
Regards
Trinath

SRM PR is not getting created in ECC backend

Hello Experts,
We are running SRM 7.0 with SRM-MDM Catalog, we are using SRM for shopping. We do have PI 7.11 running in the Environment as well.
We are on ECC 6.0 with Ehp 4.0
Purchase Order:
However we can see the PO creating successfully using PI.
Question, in the SRM table (BBP_FUNCTION_MAP), we see the object type: BUS2012 for ERP 4.0 has adapter name: /SAPSRM/CL_SOA_ADPT_PO_CRT_ERP for when creating PO. Please see teh screen shot.
is this the reason that we need PI?
Purchase Requisition:
PR Creation is not working:
PR is not getting created in the ERP, PR uses Object type: BUS2105, Adpater CL_BBP_BS_ADAPTER_RQ_CRT_470 for ERP 4.0 System type, can you please tell me if the adapter is correct for ERP 4.0 system type?
I also have a question to ask:
1) Where did you see that PR/PO was send to PI System (PI1)? My understanding is that since ERP amd SRM are 2 ABAP Systems, why we cannot send the PR/PO directly to ERP system from SRM? Why do we need a middleware(PI) in between for this process? We should be able to USE BAPI function to do it correct?
Please advice.
Thanks
Kumar

yes, i could see a PR number with all this additional details as below.
Table   BBP_PDBEI
CLIENT                       453                                                              Client
GUID                         4CAEFA58EB9D005CE1008000AC1C2031                                 Globally Unique identifier
BE_LOG_SYSTEM                QA1400                                                           Logical System of Logistics Backend
BE_OBJ_ITEM                                                                                Follow-On Object Item in Back-End System
BE_OBJECT_TYPE               BUS2105                                                          Follow-On Document Object Type in Back-End System
BE_OBJECT_ID                 2000000167                                                       Follow-On Document Object ID in Back-End System
BE_REFOBJ_TYPE                                                                                Reference Object Type in Back-End System
BE_REFOBJ                                                                                Reference Object in Back-End System
BE_REFOBJ_ITEM                                                                                Reference Object Item in Back-End System
BE_REFOBJ_SBITM                                                                               Reference Object Sub-Position in Backend System
BE_REFOBJ_TYPE2                                                                               Reference Object Type in Back-End System
BE_REFOBJ2                                                                                Reference Object in Back-End System
BE_REFOBJ_ITEM2                                                                               Reference Object Item in Back-End System
BE_REFOBJ_FYEAR2             0000                                                             Reference Document Object - Fiscal Year in Back-End System
BE_STGE_LOC                                                                                Storage location
BE_PLANT                     2016                                                             Plant
BE_BATCH                                                                                Batch Number
BE_VAL_TYPE                                                                                Valuation type
BE_MOVE_REAS                 0000                                                             Reason for Movement
BE_EXPERYDATE                00000000                                                         Shelf Life Expiration Date
BE_PUR_GROUP                 206                                                              Purchasing group
BE_PUR_ORG                   2000                                                             Purchasing organization
BE_CO_CODE                   2000                                                             Company Code
BE_DOC_TYPE                  CLRQ                                                             Purchase Requisition Document Type
BE_ACCREQUIRED                                                                                Account Assignment for Logical Backend Required
BE_SP_STK_IND                                                                                Key for Special Stock Section
BE_INFO_REC                                                                                Number of purchasing info record
BE_MOVE_TYPE                 201                                                              Movement type (inventory management)
BE_PACKNO                    0000000000                                                       Package number
BE_INTROW                    0000000000                                                       Internal line number for limits
BE_ITEM_TEXT                                                                                Short Text of a Service Purchase Order Item
BE_PO_PRICE                  1                                                                Price from Backend
BE_UNLOAD_PT                 200                                                              Unloading Point in Backend
BE_DEL_IND                                                                                Deletion Indicator in Backend Documents
BE_TRACKING_NO                                                                                Requirement Tracking Number
BE_COND_TYPE                                                                                Condition Key
BE_COND_STEP                 000                                                              Level Number
BE_COND_COUNTER              00                                                               Condition counter

GR_NON_VAL flag setting in ECC for SRM PO

Hi all,
SRM 5.0 ECS Sp12.
When we create a PO with multiple a/c assgt,the ECC PO which gets created always has the GR_NON_VAL flag set as "X".
Now if I uncheck the indicators "Confirmation-Related Invoice Verification " and "Confirm Performance of Service/Goods Receipt   " in SRM PO,then the PO replication fails in ECC and in SRM I get the below error :
With non-valuated GR, please also enter GR indicator
When I check the data which is passed to ECC,the GR_NON_VAL flag is also blank for the PO after the indicators "Confirmation-Related Invoice Verification " and "Confirm Performance of Service/Goods Receipt   " are unchecked in SRM PO.
Can someone let me know if in ECS , the GR_NON_VAL flag is always passed as blank and gets set to "X"based on ECC settings.If so,which settings in ECC determine the GR_NON_VAL flag to be set?
Can someone explain the istd behaviour for the GR_NON_VLAg flag in ECC PO for ECS when SRM PO with multiple a/c assignnment is changed for indicators "Confirmation-Related Invoice Verification " and "Confirm Performance of Service/Goods Receipt   "so that they are set to blank,Please advise.

HI
in standard we canl fill the flag GR_NON_VAL in SRM side but
the itemx structure of PO in ERP system set to space. After this mapping
BAPIs will be called.
wa_bapi_poitemx-po_itemx = 'X'.
    wa_bapi_poitemx-no_more_gr = 'X'.
    wa_bapi_poitemx-final_inv = 'X'.
    wa_bapi_poitemx-gr_ind = 'X'.
    wa_bapi_poitemx-delete_ind = 'X'.
delivery tolerance has to be taken over
    wa_bapi_poitemx-over_dlv_tol = 'X'.
    wa_bapi_poitemx-unlimited_dlv = 'X'.
    wa_bapi_poitemx-under_dlv_tol = 'X'.
note 644721, the Goods receipt non-valuated should be set according
to the backend customizing for this we have to clear the x-flag
    wa_bapi_poitemx-gr_non_val = ' '.
    wa_bapi_poitem-gr_non_val = ' '.
The redetermination will happen in PO create / change process
(within BAPI_PO_CHANGE and BAPI_PO_CREATE1).
1353431    ECS: PO in ERP always created with GR_NON_V
Summer

ERROR-With non-valuated GR, please also enter GR indicator

Hi,
We are on SRM 5.0 SP12,Extended Classic scenario.
For all PO's which have no follow on docs created,whenever the
Confirmation-Related Invoice Verification (GR_BASEDIV) and Confirm
Performance of Service/Goods Receipt(GR_IND) fields are changed,the
changes are not transferred to ECC backend .The SRM PO status is set
to "ERROR IN PROCESS" and in RZ20 we see the folling messages:
PurchOrder 5000012063: Purchase order still contains faulty items
PO 5000012063: With non-valuated GR, please also enter GR indicat or
PO 5000012063: Instance 5000012063 of object type PurchaseOrder c ould
not be changed
Has anybody come across such an issue?

Hi,
We also faced similar issues. In such cases, do minor changes to line item of the PO quantity / price or other fields which are relevent for creation of the new versions of the PO.
Then use Function module BBP_PO_EXE_TRANSFER to push all the changes along with GR Indicator of the PO in to ECC.
In you case, the changes to PO is not triggerig the new Version of the PO. Hence it is not updating in back end.
Thanks
Giri

Valuated purchase order??

Hi MM experts,
Please help me understand better about cost flow from purchase order.
1) Where in the purchase order document entered via SRM that identify if the purchase order is valuated or non valuated??
2) In 3 way match scenario, when good is received, costs hit a WBS/cost center and GRIR account got credited. This transaction shows up on WBS/cost center cost report as well as on FI document. When invoice is received, GRIR account got debited and vendor got credited. Even this second pair of transactions does not show up on WBS or cost center report; in some cases, it shows account assignment to a WBS/cost center on an FI document.
Why this is so?? The GRIR is cost element category 90. I thought that FI document should not show the account assignment since cost already hit a cost object at the good receipt?
Your help is much appreciated.
Monica
Edited by: Monica Kong on May 5, 2009 5:08 AM

Hi
In case of PR/PO with account assignment category as P (WBS element) following postings will takes place on WBS element report.
1) PO created
There will be only commitment on WBS element.
2) Good receipt
- Dr. Meterial acccount assigned to WBS = 100
- Cr. GR/IR = 100
at this point of time commitment will become actual because of goods receipt (FI posting)
In a FI document, we saw the above entries. In a WBS cost report, we see a good receipt transaction hitting a WBS = 100. So both places, we saw the same information which is above.
3) Invoice receipt. In an FI document, we saw
- Dr. GR/IR acccount assigned to WBS = 100
- Cr. Vendor =100
here only GR/IR clearing account which is an intermediate account will be hit but no posting will be made on WBS element.
The amount on PO will become actual on WBS element only at time of either Goods receipt or Invoice receipt but not in both transaction unless there is some price change.
Say PO value is 100 and GR value is 100 and IV value is 110. Then at time of MIGO, 100 will be the actual value on WBS element and at time of MIRO extra 10 will become actual on WBS element.
You can simulate this and check WBS ACTP (S_alr_87013542) report.
Thanks

SRM - SAP/Procurement

Hello Guys
I am new with SRM and I have a work flow that work at the moment with the engineers creating a reservation that is checked by a warehouse material manager which according with the material availability triggers the procurement process creating a PR or just goods issue the material.
Is there any possibility that the SRM automatic would triggers the procurement process according with the material availability, remember that the reservation that the engineers raise it is allocated to a WBS element, and our stock is not valuated, which means the cost to the project comes from the PO.
If some one could send just the material that would explain some possibilities about the shopping cart triggering the warehouse management would be enough.
Thanks

Hi Carlos,
this is not possible alone within the SRM System.
Instead of this I would suggest the external requirement scenario.
You can do the MRP in the R/3 backend system, and send the purchase requisitions (depending on purchasing group or material group) with the external requirement scenario into the SRM system. This request will be sent into the sourcing coocpit as a shopping cart, which can be proceed by the sourcer (PO, Bid, Auction).
Kind regards,
Peter

Transfer attachment from SRM SHC to ECC PO

Hi,
Im working on SRM 7.0.Classic scenario.I need to enable the transfer of attachments from SRM SC to R/3 PO.Can anyone explain the steps to achieve the above?
Also in case of extended classic scenario,is the attachment transferred automatically from the SRM Local PO to ECC PO?
Thanks!
regards,
SRM Tech

Hello SRMTECH,
You have to do some configuration settings in SPRO
SPRO>Supplier Relationship Management>SRM Server>Cross-Application Basic Settings>Define Settings for Attachments.
We are also working for the same requirement. We have did following configuration / customization to achieve this.
- Activated BADI "BBP_CREATE_BE_RQ_NEW" in SRM and set the indicator as follow:
cs_ctrl_att-BE_DOC_TYPE = 'SRM'.
cs_ctrl_att-BE_storage_cat = 'DMS_C1_ST'.
cs_ctrl_att-TRANSFER_ACTIVE = 'X'.
- In ECC Side T.code DC10 and defined document type for SRM with following
Add a New Document Type SRM (if not already exists). Set 'Use KPro', 'Version Assign' and 'Change
Docs'. Set the Internal and External Number Range (02 and 01). Use MCDOKZNR as Number Exit.
Ver No. Incr = 1 and Set the File Size (Usually 10000000 bytes).
Once the Document Type is created, define Object links to PO Item and Pur Req Item. Use - Screen
Number 247 and Screen Number 248 with Valuation Object of EBAN and EKPO for Objects EBAN
(PReq) and EKPO (PO) for Doc Type SRM.
After doing this changes we were able to transfer attachements but we are still facing one issue as we were not able to open that particular document in ECC / R3.
See related threads for more pointers:
Attachment transfer issue from Shopping cart to Purchase req in ECC
Re: How to check the attachment in ME53N
Re: Sending attachments from SRM to SAP Purchase Requisition
Re: Attachments with follow-on documents.
Arshad

SRM Classic Scenario Reporting

Hi Experts,
We have implemented SRM 5.0 classic scenario and BI 7.0. i would like to know various reporting possibilites for shopping carts with backend PO.
One of the business requirement is to report on Shopping carts, respective PO information in the backend (ECC6.0), and PO history information like GR and IR posting etc.
I was able to identify the tables in SRM which has been updated with this information from the backend system ECC 6.0. My BI consultant is saying this cant be uploaded into BI system, since there is no change document is created, the delta process wont see the update. He is asking for change document creation, but I am not sure whether this is the right approach or best practise.
I am sure there should be standard practise and what are limitations of doing a full load every day for uploading the information into BI no matter what. I need your help to recommend a best solution
Vijay

Hi Carla
yes. Indeed you need enhancement
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/SRM/BBP_CREATE_BE_PO_NEW-CreatePOin+backend
you need to clear the account assignment while creating a PO in the backend.
so PO will be created in the backend rather than in SRM .
but see impacts - how inventory gl accounts are posted while doing good receipt. Is it taking GL account from valuation class .
Hide the Order as direct too in SRM .
create one custome field in shopping cart to determine to order a PO in the backend (for stock materials) so when you check this field, this sc item PO will be created without account assignment.
Muthu

Inforecord price for SRM originated orders - CLASSIC scenario

Hi! Few months' back, I have posted some questions re the behaviour of the price on the PO when orders are generated out of SRM in a classic scenarioI have just completed testing and ended up with the following results:
1. If I create a shopping cart with material number for direct consumption and have a vendor defaulted from vendor list, the price reflected in the PO is from the inforecord. So, effectively, I could have $1000 on my shopping cart but PO showing $950 as this is the value in the inforecord. The $1000 comes from the material condition record in SRM (extracted via EBP_GET_BACKEND_PRICES).
2. If I create a shopping cart with material number for STOCK and have a vendor defaulted from vendor list, the price reflected in the PO is that maintained on the shopping cart. Is this behaviour correct? Note that in this case, the master PO is in SRM even in a classic scenario and I wonder whether it is because of this that the pricing behaviour is different.
Other observation: For stock purchase, I know that if I have multiple vendors (from vendor list and some from inforecords) and if I picked one of the vendors, the price will be adopted at the point of shopping cart so that the user has a 'confirmed' view of the price and there should be no discrepancies of prices between the shopping cart and the PO.
Can someone please shed some lights as to what should the standard behaviour be?
Cheers!
SF

hello SF
rule :- shopping cart price is a material price and it comes from your report and prices are stored in COMMPR01 .( EBP_GET_BACKEND_PRICES BY this report).
really the prices are picked from source of suooly like infor record , vendor list or contract while creating the purchase order.
i create a shopping cart for 100 USD since material price is 100 usd but PO created for 75 USD.
since contract material price is 75 usd.
With regards to using report EBP_GET_BACKEND_PRICES to upload the
prices from the backend system into EBP. Please refer to the online
documentation of this report:
'Under "Price reference per product", you can specify if the average
value of all valuation groups/plants is to be calculated or if the
valuation price from the first valuation group/plant is to be used. If
the average value is to be calculated, choose "Average of all prices".
If you wish to use the first valuation price, choose "Use first price".
The standard setting calls for the "Average of all prices" to be
calculated.'
This is how this report works. If you want to take another price you
have to change the coding according your requirements.
You will need to debug into the backend through
RFC-Call for backend-table MBEW
CALL FUNCTION 'RFC_READ_TABLE' DESTINATION iv_rfcdest
in FORM read_mbew and see the select statement that reads this table.
The report is taking exactly one price out of the data
package extracted out of R/3. If this could also be a moving average
price is more a question which kind of data is extracted out of of R/3
and how the R/3 config looks like - and if this moving average is in thelist.

SRM AND SAP R/3 ADDRESS UPDATE PROBLEM

HI,
i create a purchase order in SRM SYSTEM i seen this purchase order in SAP R/3 address is not update properaly in SAP R\3 like postal code, city etc.
SAP R/3 IS TAKE A DIFFERENT ADDRESS RESPECT TO SAM SYSTEM
PLASE GIVE ME A SOULATION ASAP.
THANKS
VIKASH

Hi,
I was talking about the Ship to address in shopping cart which should appear in the PO in R/3, which is not appearing, instead the PO is showing the address of the valuation area present in R/3. For your kind information, I am working on Classic Scenario.
Regards,
Vikas

Error When Create Shopping Cart from catalog SRM

Hi all,
Currently, I have problem need your help.
I tried to create an shopping cart from catalog. But I don't know how the G_L_ACCT was lost.
The information about account like this:
Now, I want to know where this data is selected. Would you please help me for this issue.
Extra Information: Acc_cat = 'A'.

Dear Melynessa: normally you should not get this error message when flagging "Order as Direct Material" in SRM 7.0.
Please, check in your backend ECC6 if "Value updating" flag has been selected or not for the material type of your SC material ID under the IMG path "Logistic - General --> Material Master --> Basic Settings --> Materual Types --> Define Attributes of Material Types"
If field "Value updating" for material type is not flagged then, when creating a PReq or PO in SAP ECC6, you will get always an error message asking you for an account assignment.
Due to the circumstance above, in SRM, materials ID belonging to non-valuated material types should not be ordered as direct (flag order as direct is available always when you enter a material ID, even when it is non-valuated). If you flag the field "Order as Direct" for a non-valuated material, standard SRM system doesn't issue any error message. So, maybe, there is BAdi in your SRM system checking the "Value updating" for material type and avoiding "Order as Direct Material" flag being selected when it is a non-valuated material
Hope it helps.
regards
Valentí

Valuation In SRM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for