Value based hierarchies and Period dimension should only contain  2  monthl

Hi,
Can anyone tell me what is value based hierarchies. And also can anyone let me know to filter the records in AWm because in Period dimension should only contain 2 monthly values (Oct. 2008 ( 200810) and Sep. 2008 ( 200809)) it is urgent.
Thanks
vel

The following definition of a value hierarchy comes from the OLAP Developers guide
"A hierarchy defined only by the parent-child relationships among dimension members. The dimension members at a particular distance from the base level do not form a meaningful group for analysis, so the levels are not named. For example, an employee dimension might have a parent-child relation that identifies each employee's supervisor. However, levels that group together first-, second-, and third-level supervisors and so forth may not be meaningful for analysis."
Typically this means that the source table has two columns, VALUE and PARENT, where PARENT has a (logical) foreign key relationship to VALUE. An example may be EMPLOYEE, MANAGER, where MANAGERs are also EMPLOYEEs.
The simplest way to restrict the values loaded into the AW is to define a SQL view over the source table with an appropriate WHERE condition. You then use AWM to map the dimension to your new view. E.g.
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW RESTRICTED_TIME AS
SELECT *
FROM TIME
WHERE MONTH IN (200810, 200809)

Similar Messages

  • Value based on the periodic unit price (only with pr.ctrl S)

    Dear all,
    There is this field in mateial master called "Value based on the periodic unit price (only with pr.ctrl S)" in accounting view 1,
    1 - May I know what is this field about (in between our company using material ledger).
    2 - May I know why the value of this field are different between our company period 6 and period 7 for this year? what contribute to it? and is it something wrong with different value between two different period or absolutely normal?
    Thanks.
    Tuff

    Dear all,
    Does anyone know my question?
    Thanks,
    tuff

  • Value based on the periodic unit price(only with pr.ctrl S) field in MatMas

    Dear all,
    There is this field in mateial master called "Value based on the periodic unit price (only with pr.ctrl S)" in accounting view 1,
    1 - May I know what is this field about (in between our company using material ledger).
    2 - May I know why the value of this field are different between our company period 6 and period 7 for this year? what contribute to it? and is it something wrong with different value between two different period or absolutely normal?
    Thanks.
    Tuff

    Hi Tuffy,
    For your 1st query:
    PUP field in Accounting 1 (if ML is active, Price Determination indicator=3) is the result of Actual Costing Run (CKMLCP) closing entry.
    For your 2nd query:
    In most of the cases the values will be different in Previous Period and Current Period. e.g.Period 6 values are the results of Actual Costing Run (CKMLCP) in 1st week of Period 6 for Previous Period (i.e. Period 5). Period 7 values are the results of Actual Costing Run (CKMLCP) in 1st week of Period 7 for Previous Period (i.e. Period 6).
    The reason for the different values: Price differences, Exchange rate differences, Price/Exchange rate differences from Low lower materials, etc.
    Thanks & Regards,
    ADI

  • Value based on the periodic unit price (only with pr.ctrl S) field in mat.

    Dear all,
    There is this field in mateial master called "Value based on the periodic unit price (only with pr.ctrl S)" in accounting view 1,
    1 - May I know what is this field about (in between our company using material ledger).
    2 - May I know why the value of this field are different between our company period 6 and period 7 for this year? what contribute to it? and is it something wrong with different value between two different period or absolutely normal?
    Thanks.
    Tuff

    Hi Tuffy,
    For your 1st query:
    PUP field in Accounting 1 (if ML is active, Price Determination indicator=3) is the result of Actual Costing Run (CKMLCP) closing entry.
    For your 2nd query:
    In most of the cases the values will be different in Previous Period and Current Period. e.g.Period 6 values are the results of Actual Costing Run (CKMLCP) in 1st week of Period 6 for Previous Period (i.e. Period 5). Period 7 values are the results of Actual Costing Run (CKMLCP) in 1st week of Period 7 for Previous Period (i.e. Period 6).
    The reason for the different values: Price differences, Exchange rate differences, Price/Exchange rate differences from Low lower materials, etc.
    Thanks & Regards,
    ADI

  • Multiple Value Based hierarchies per MOLAP dimension

    Hi,
    a) Is it possible to have multiple value based heirarchies in a single MOLAP dimension in OWB and deployed to analytical workspace ?
    Are there any pitfalls, that we need to be aware of...
    b) Can we have a mix of Value and level based heirarchies per dimension ?
    Thanks in advance,
    Chakri

    Hi Chakri
    Yes, you can have multiple value based hierarchies and also a mix of value/level based.
    Cheers
    David

  • How to populate member values to Year and Period Dimensions

    Hi,
    I have set up the following members in account dimension:
    Lease From (Date Type)
    Lease To (Date Type)
    Lease Amount (Currency Type)
    If I input Jan-2012 in Lease From, Nov-2013 in Lease To and 1,000 in Lease Amount, all in BegBalance->Fy12, how can I populate the 1,000 to the correponding Period and Year dimensions using business rule. I need 1,000 in Lease Amount->Fy12->Jan all way through to Lease Amount->Fy13->Nov. I do not want to create a input form with all the years and periods for monthly input as I may have over 100 lease information with different from and to dates.
    Or is there any alternate method I can get the expected results.
    Thanks.

    Hi
    This is a really complex problem! It may help you to look at the documentation around the CapEx planning module as this is Oracle's take on calculating asset depreciation etc on a similar basis (create asset in BegBalance -> NoYear and calculate which periods to poulate depreciation data in using dates, variables and rules). The business rules are presented in full in the doc below but I warn you the code is complex and not easy to understand, although you may get the principles
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17236_01/epm.1112/cpx_admin_11122.pdf
    You ought to be able to do something using dates and period / year indicies (remember dates are stored in Essbase in something like the format YYYYMMDD, e.g. 20121107 so should be easy to compare whether the date for the period is within range of the dates entered).
    I have also tried to do something similar using smartlists in a prototype before but this proved a bit more complicated and not necessarily any more reliable than using dates
    Hope this helps
    Stuart

  • OLAP on 11g and Materialised Views with Multiple Value-Based Hierarchies

    Hello OLAPians
    I am trying to setup Orable BIEE to report on an OLAP cube with pre-aggregated data. As OBIEE is not able to hook into the OLAP directly i have to create an SQL cubeview.
    Currently i am on a 10g OLAP environment and am using the oracle sample SQL cubeview generator to create an SQLview of my cube.
    The cube itself has multiple dimensions and these dimensions have multiple VALUE-based (ragged) hierarchies and dimension members can be shared across hierarchies also.
    Initially i had a problem running the view generator plugin because there is a bug within it that does not finish if there are multiple value-based hierarchies present. I was able to get around this by manually editing the limitmap for the cubeview and manually creating the SQL view.
    The question that i want to ask is how robust is the 11g materialised views with multiple value-based hierarchies and the sharing of dimension members across different hierarchies?
    Has anyone successfully been able to create a cubeview and import it into OBIEE without the hassle of manually editing the limitmap?
    A problem arises with the value-based setup whereby if the client creates a newer depth in the ragged hierarchy, i need to manually create the limitmap and the cube-view over again, and then re-map the BI Administration mappings.

    The simple answer to your question,
    how robust is the 11g materialised views with multiple value-based hierarchies...?is that materialized views are not supported on top of value-based hierarchies in 11g. The reason is that it is not possible to write a reasonable SQL statement that aggregates a fact over a value-based hierarchy. Such a SQL statement is necessary if we want to create a rewritable MV on top of the cube.
    But I suspect this is not what you are really asking. If you are trying to set up OBIEE on top of the cube in 10g using the view generator, then you will probably want to use the "ET VIEWS" that are generated automatically in 11g. These are generated whether or not you enable materialized views on top of your cube. I am not aware of any issues with the generated value-based hierarchy view support in 11g. Members may be shared between value hierarchies and you will not need to generate or modify limit maps.

  • Value based hierarchies, Skip Level Hierarchies

    Hello,
    I need to create hierarchy based on column value , Please give me some details on implementing value based hierarchies and skip level hierarchies in obiee 10.1.3.
    Thank you

    With 10.3 i do not think we have a inbuilt solution to build value based hierarchies, you have to flatten the hierarchy and build a level based hierarchy.
    OBIEE 11g has value based hierarchies feature.
    refer this one for 11g.
    http://sandybi.wordpress.com/2010/08/17/hierarchies-in-obiee-11g-part-1/
    - Madan
    Edited by: Madan Thota on Sep 14, 2010 11:15 AM

  • OBIEE and Oracle OLAP Value Based Hierarchies

    Hi there...
    I have a value based dimension built on Oracle OLAP and want to map it on OBIEE Administration tool.
    I've been using the above link as reference:
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/obe/olap_biee/CreateBIEEMetadata.htm
    There's no option to import from Oracle Multi-dimensional Database. Either to import/configure the view created by OLAP as an Unballanced or Ragged Dimension.
    I also checked this example, but it uses ESSBASE as the multi-dimensional source....
    http://www.rittmanmead.com/2008/08/27/ragged-hierarchy-handling-in-obiee/
    How to map this Ragged Dimension created in OLAP workspace in OBIEE? Any suggestions or directions will be highly appreciated...
    Thanks in advance
    Marcos

    Mark and others,
    You can create OLAP_TABLE views with level columns on top of value-based hierarchies. BI Beans used to do that too behind the scenes in Discoverer Plus OLAP. If you trace the Discoverer session, where you are querying data from Value-based hierarchies, you will see that it also generates OLAP_TABLE views with level columns in it.
    So the question is how to do it. Internally, even for Value-based hierarchies Oracle OLAP keeps track of the "depth" of each value by using a structure called GID_DIMENSION (i.e., Grouping Dimension). Here is an example of a view on top of a value-based hierarchy (CFC_ACCT_GAPP) for RPT_ACCOUNT dimension. You have to know how "deep" your value-based hierarchy is.
    Similar kind of a thing is done by OLAP View Generator application, which I never use - since I always prefer to define my own OLAP_TABLE views.
    This kind of a view can then be used in the RPD of OBIEE.
    select *
    FROM table(OLAP_TABLE ('AW duration session',
    *'DIMENSION RPT_ACCT_ID FROM RPT_ACCOUNT WITH*
    HIERARCHY RPT_ACCOUNT_GAAP_PARENT   FROM RPT_ACCOUNT_PARENTREL(RPT_ACCOUNT_HIERLIST ''CFC_ACCT_GAAP'') INHIERARCHY RPT_ACCOUNT_INHIER
    HATTRIBUTE RPT_ACCOUNT_GAAP_LVL_NUM FROM RPT_ACCOUNT_DEPTHVAL
    FAMILYREL RPT_ACCOUNT_GAAP_LVL1,
    RPT_ACCOUNT_GAAP_LVL2,
    RPT_ACCOUNT_GAAP_LVL3,
    RPT_ACCOUNT_GAAP_LVL4,
    RPT_ACCOUNT_GAAP_LVL5,
    RPT_ACCOUNT_GAAP_LVL6,
    RPT_ACCOUNT_GAAP_LVL7,
    RPT_ACCOUNT_GAAP_LVL8
    FROM RPT_ACCOUNT_FAMILYRELVAL(GID_DIMENSION 127),
    RPT_ACCOUNT_FAMILYRELVAL(GID_DIMENSION 63),
    RPT_ACCOUNT_FAMILYRELVAL(GID_DIMENSION 31),
    RPT_ACCOUNT_FAMILYRELVAL(GID_DIMENSION 15),
    RPT_ACCOUNT_FAMILYRELVAL(GID_DIMENSION 7),
    RPT_ACCOUNT_FAMILYRELVAL(GID_DIMENSION 3),
    RPT_ACCOUNT_FAMILYRELVAL(GID_DIMENSION 1),
    RPT_ACCOUNT_FAMILYRELVAL(GID_DIMENSION 0)
    FAMILYREL RPT_ACCOUNT_GAAP_LVL1_DSC,
    RPT_ACCOUNT_GAAP_LVL2_DSC,
    RPT_ACCOUNT_GAAP_LVL3_DSC,
    RPT_ACCOUNT_GAAP_LVL4_DSC,
    RPT_ACCOUNT_GAAP_LVL5_DSC,
    RPT_ACCOUNT_GAAP_LVL6_DSC,
    RPT_ACCOUNT_GAAP_LVL7_DSC,
    RPT_ACCOUNT_GAAP_LVL8_DSC
    FROM RPT_ACCOUNT_FAMILYRELVAL(GID_DIMENSION 127),
    RPT_ACCOUNT_FAMILYRELVAL(GID_DIMENSION 63),
    RPT_ACCOUNT_FAMILYRELVAL(GID_DIMENSION 31),
    RPT_ACCOUNT_FAMILYRELVAL(GID_DIMENSION 15),
    RPT_ACCOUNT_FAMILYRELVAL(GID_DIMENSION 7),
    RPT_ACCOUNT_FAMILYRELVAL(GID_DIMENSION 3),
    RPT_ACCOUNT_FAMILYRELVAL(GID_DIMENSION 1),
    RPT_ACCOUNT_FAMILYRELVAL(GID_DIMENSION 0)
    LABEL RPT_ACCOUNT_LONG_DESCRIPTION
    ATTRIBUTE ACCOUNT_LDSC    FROM RPT_ACCOUNT_LONG_DESCRIPTION
    ATTRIBUTE ACCOUNT_SDSC    FROM RPT_ACCOUNT_SHORT_DESCRIPTION
    ATTRIBUTE ACCOUNT_TYPE    FROM RPT_ACCOUNT_TYPE
    ATTRIBUTE SOURCE_LEVEL    FROM RPT_ACCOUNT_LEVEL
    ATTRIBUTE CALCULATION     FROM RPT_ACCOUNT_CALCULATION
    ATTRIBUTE CALC_DATA       FROM RPT_ACCOUNT_CALC_DATA
    ATTRIBUTE GAAP_SORT_ORDER FROM RPT_ACCOUNT_GAAP_SORT_ORDER
    ATTRIBUTE RATIO           FROM RPT_ACCOUNT_RATIO
    ATTRIBUTE ACCOUNT_LEVEL   FROM RPT_ACCOUNT_LEVELREL'))

  • Value-based hierarchy on ROLAP dimension. Is this possible and how?

    Value-based hierarchy on ROLAP dimension. Is this possible and how?
    If yes, what tool I have to use. Any simple examples?

    Based on my experience of OWB10gR2 the option to create a "Value Based" hierarchy is only enabled if you create an AW based OLAP model. If you want to create a ROLAP model then I do not think this is possible.
    Question is why create a ROLAP model when you could get better performance and more powerful analytical features by using a multidimensional model within an analytic workspace.
    Keith

  • PeerExceptions list should only contain OAException elements iexpenses

    Hi All,
    I tried to login to iexpenses(11i) page and tried updating the expense report.
    As soon as i open an expense report am geting the below error.
    "java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: peerExceptions list should only contain OAException elements."
    this error appears only some times.As per the metalink notes "https://support.oracle.com/epmos/faces/ui/km/SearchDocDisplay.jspx?id=1102322.1&type=DOCUMENT&displayIndex=2&returnToSrId=&srnum=&org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.webapp.AdfacesFilterImpl.IS_RETURNING=true&_adf.ctrl-state=15dcc3i8lk_9&_afr.ts=1366263980560"
    1. Navigate to the appropriate Oracle Human Resources Responsibility -> People: Enter and Maintain
    2. Pull up the record of the employee name who is having the issue
    3. Click on Assignment button -> Purchase Order Information
    4. Enter the default expense account and Set of Books (release 11i) / Ledger (release 12) information.
    i checked in the database for the above fields mentioned for my particular user.
    select set_of_books_id, default_code_comb_id from per_all_assignments_f where person_id=XXX
    and these fields have values and are not null
    Please do let me know if anyone has faced this issue and resolved the same.
    Thanks in advance
    Edited by: 1000835 on Apr 18, 2013 1:24 AM
    Edited by: 1000835 on Apr 18, 2013 1:34 AM

    Hi,
    Check in database if there are some stale data in the lines of the expense report that you are trying to update.
    Delete the expense report and try to submit it again.
    Also check the securing attributes of the account, if ICX_HR_PERSON_ID attribute is missing or incorrect, it also throw an exception.
    Hope it helps.

  • Problems with value-based hierarchies in Oracle 11gR2

    Hello,
    I have the following problem:
    I want to cereate a dimension with 2 hierarchies.
    These hierarchies have to be value-based.
    It's no problem to fill and display one of them, but when I fill both and try to display them, at the lowest level, the parent-child relevancy is now incorrect.
    Let's display this in OLAP Worksheet for Cube Type OLAP 11g :
    lcolwidth=20
    rpr down nim_2 w 25 NIM_2_PARENTREL
                              ------------------NIM_2_PARENTREL------------------
                              ------------------NIM_2_HIERLIST-------------------
    NIM_2                                KON                       AGT
    L1_Total_AGT_A            NA                        NA
    L1_Total_KONZ_K           NA                        NA
    L2_AGT_A_A                NA                        L1_Total_AGT_A
    L2_AGT_B_A                NA                        L1_Total_AGT_A
    L2_AGT_C_A                NA                        L1_Total_AGT_A
    L2_KONZ_1_K               L1_Total_KONZ_K           NA
    L2_KONZ_2_K               L1_Total_KONZ_K           NA
    L3_100_A                  NA                        L2_AGT_A_A
    L3_100_K                  L2_KONZ_1_K               NA
    L3_200_A                  NA                        L2_AGT_B_A
    L3_200_K                  L2_KONZ_1_K               NA
    L3_300_A                  NA                        L2_AGT_C_A
    L3_300_K                  L2_KONZ_2_K               NA
    L4_101_A                  NA                        L3_100_A
    L4_101_K                  L3_100_K                  NA
    L4_301_A                  NA                        L3_300_A
    L4_301_K                  L3_300_K                  NA
    L5_302_A                  NA                        L4_301_A
    L5_302_K                  L4_301_K                  NA
    100                       NA                        L3_100_A
    101                       L4_101_K                  NA
    102                       NA                        L4_101_A
    200                       NA                        L3_200_A
    201                       L3_200_K                  NA
    300                       L3_300_K                  NA
    301                       NA                        L4_301_A
    302                       NA                        L5_302_A
    303                       NA                        L5_302_A
    304                       NA                        L5_302_AAs you see, the lowest level items are only connectet with one of the hierachies, instead connected with both. (100, 101, e.g)
    If I build the same dimension in a 10g Cube, the result is now correct.
    Let's display this in OLAP Worksheet for Cube Type OLAP 10g :
    lcolwidth=20
    rpr down nim w 25 NIM_PARENTREL
                         -------------------NIM_PARENTREL-------------------
                         -------------------NIM_HIERLIST--------------------
    NIM                             AGT                       KON
    L1_Total_AGT_A       NA                        NA
    L1_Total_KONZ_K      NA                        NA
    L2_AGT_A_A           L1_Total_AGT_A            NA
    L2_AGT_B_A           L1_Total_AGT_A            NA
    L2_AGT_C_A           L1_Total_AGT_A            NA
    L2_KONZ_1_K          NA                        L1_Total_KONZ_K
    L2_KONZ_2_K          NA                        L1_Total_KONZ_K
    L3_100_A             L2_AGT_A_A                NA
    L3_100_K             NA                        L2_KONZ_1_K
    L3_200_A             L2_AGT_B_A                NA
    L3_200_K             NA                        L2_KONZ_1_K
    L3_300_A             L2_AGT_C_A                NA
    L3_300_K             NA                        L2_KONZ_2_K
    L4_101_A             L3_100_A                  NA
    L4_101_K             NA                        L3_100_K
    L4_301_A             L3_300_A                  NA
    L4_301_K             NA                        L3_300_K
    L5_302_A             L4_301_A                  NA
    L5_302_K             NA                        L4_301_K
    100                  L3_100_A                  L3_100_K
    101                  L4_101_A                  L4_101_K
    102                  L4_101_A                  L4_101_K
    200                  L3_200_A                  L3_200_K
    201                  L3_200_A                  L3_200_K
    300                  L3_300_A                  L3_300_K
    301                  L4_301_A                  L4_301_K
    303                  L5_302_A                  L5_302_K
    304                  L5_302_A                  L5_302_K
    302                  L5_302_A                  L5_302_K-----
    We are using the latest Version of AWM: Version 11.2.0.1.0A
    Database:
    Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
    PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
    "CORE     11.2.0.1.0     Production"
    TNS for IBM/AIX RISC System/6000: Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
    Thank you verry much for any help.

    11.2.0.2 for AIX was announced in October 2010. See DOC ID 1249584.1
    What is being announced?
    We are pleased announce the October 19, 2010 release of Oracle Database 11g Release 2 Patchset 1 (11.2.0.2) on HP-UX > Itanium and IBM AIX on POWER Systems.Patchset 10098816
    Description 11.2.0.2.0 PATCH SET FOR ORACLE DATABASE SERVER
    Product Oracle Database Family
    I have looked, but I cannot find a formal bug for this problem. My hunch is that it was fixed as a side effect of other changes, and I know there were several in this area. My simple test case did work in 11.2.0.2, so I hope it is all fixed. But feel free to enter an SR if you want. (If you mention my name in the SR then support should contact me.) You should certainly do this if moving on to 11.2.0.2 does not resolve the issue.

  • Value based Hierarchies

    Hello,
    Has anyone created a parent-child hierarchy using Oracle Warehouse Builder or Analytic Workspace Manager. I am using Oracle 10g Rel2 (and AWM) and OWB 10g Rel2.
    The values in the dimension table defines the hierarchy.
    I don't see an option of creating a value-based hierarchy in OWB though it is mentioned that it supports this particular hierarchy.
    In AWM, I am able to create the hierarchy but when I try to view the data in the dimension it gives an error BIB-9531 Invalid hierarchy specified.
    Can you please let me know if I am missing something.
    Thanks a lot in advance!
    Regards,
    Maruthi

    To create a value based hierarchy:
    define the storage as MOLAP, as a minimum create 2 attributes one for the dimension member (define as business in Identifier column), one for the parent member referenece (define as parent in Identifier column), the hierarchy will have no levels. If you add this dimension into a map, you should have a mapping port for both the dimension member and the parent reference. The dimension will use 'Use natural keys from data source'.
    There is an expert for simplifying some of this, not sure on when it will be made available on OTN, it drives the creation of the dimensional objects from tables/views etc..

  • How to get the Multiplied value between measure and a dimension base on user selection using dynamically

    Hi Experts,
    We had developed a cube with the Measures and Dimensions.
    I had a requirment as the measures should be muliplied by the currency value of different countries and get me the results.
    For Example.
    In SSRS report, the user will select "EUR" then the measures should multiply with the EUR based value for the particular month and get the result in the SSRS report. If the user select any other currency value, that should multiply with the measure
    value and get the result in SSRS report.
    How to do that in SSAS Cube.
    Thanks
    Shashi

    Hi ,
    If I understand your requirement  correctly , then you need currency Conversion.
    you can refer this links.
    http://consultingblogs.emc.com/christianwade/archive/2006/08/24/Currency-Conversion-in-Analysis-Services-2005.aspx
    http://www.ssas-info.com/analysis-services-faq/27-mdx/244-how-change-currency-symbol-based-on-selected-currency-dimension-member
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/18672.currency-conversion-in-ssas-2012-multidimensional-tabular.aspx
    May I know , You Require all this using MDX and SSRS Parameter ?
    Thanks

  • How to Aggregate "Value Based Hierarchies"

    I've a tipical parent-child dimension ( Company ).
    I've created Company dimension using Analitic Workspace Manager defining the Hierarchy as "Value Based Hierarchy".
    In the fact table there are some entries related to non leaf nodes of the Company dimension.
    After the loading process I view the cube but I see the aggregation computed only on leaf nodes, intermediate node's amounts were not summed.
    Example on Company table ( from "Kimball Design Tip #17: Populating Hierarchy Helper Tables" )
    Microsoft               
    ---Software
    ------Consulting
    ------Products=================AMOUNT==>100.0
    ---------Office
    ------------Visio
    ---------------Visio-Europe====AMOUNT==>100.0
    ---------Back-Office
    ------------SQL-Server
    ---------------OLAP-Services===AMOUNT==>100.0
    ---------------DTS
    ---------------Repository======AMOUNT==>100.0
    ---------Developer-Tools
    ---------Windows
    ---------Entertainment
    ------------Games
    ------------Multimedia
    ------Education
    ---Online-Services=============AMOUNT==>100.0
    ------WebTV
    ------MSN
    ---------MSN.co.uk
    ---------Hotmail.com
    ---------MSNBC
    ------------MSNBC-Online=======AMOUNT==>100.0
    ---------Expedia
    ------------Expedia.co.uk
    Expected Aggregation: 100 + 100 + 100 + 100 + 100 + 100 = 600
    But I see only 400. , it seems that Online-Services and Products Entries were not aggregated.
    What's wrong?
    Andrea

    Aggregation aggregates from lower levels to higher levels overwriting whatever values might be in the upper level cells. Aggregation within the analytic workspace is not cummulative. The problem is that commulative aggregation is to compute the first time the data is aggregated, but it's very difficult to understand what do in later aggregations. E.g., in your example you would expect the following values from these nodes (I'm not including the whole example:
    Microsoft 400.00
    ---Software 400.00
    ------Consulting 400.00
    ------Products=================AMOUNT==>100.0
    ---------Office 100.00
    ------------Visio 100.00
    ---------------Visio-Europe====AMOUNT==>100.0
    ---------Back-Office 200.00
    ------------SQL-Server 200.00
    ---------------OLAP-Services===AMOUNT==>100.0
    ---------------DTS
    ---------------Repository======AMOUNT==>100.0
    If you aggregate again and aggregation is cummulative, you would get:
    Microsoft 1900.00
    ---Software 1500.00
    ------Consulting 1100.00
    ------Products=================AMOUNT==>700.0
    ---------Office 300.00
    ------------Visio 300.00
    ---------------Visio-Europe====AMOUNT==>100.0
    ---------Back-Office 400.00
    ------------SQL-Server 400.00
    ---------------OLAP-Services===AMOUNT==>100.0
    ---------------DTS
    ---------------Repository======AMOUNT==>100.0
    That is, there's no way to understand whether to accumulate or not.
    You can model this by adding dummy detail members for all summary members and aggregating from those. E.g.,
    Microsoft
    ---Software
    ------Consulting
    ------Products
    ------------------- Products Detail 100.00
    ---------Office
    ------------Visio
    ---------------Visio-Europe====AMOUNT==>100.0
    ---------Back-Office
    ------------SQL-Server
    ---------------OLAP-Services===AMOUNT==>100.0
    ---------------DTS
    ---------------Repository======AMOUNT==>100.0
    ---------Developer-Tools
    ---------Windows
    ---------Entertainment
    ------------Games
    ------------Multimedia
    ------Education
    In this case, you can aggregate as often as you like.

Maybe you are looking for