Vendor evaluation - Automatic new evaluation

Hi,
Vendor evaluation is maintained. But it does not get updated automatically after GR. We have to update them one by one (ME61/ME63). Is there a way to automatically revaluate multiple vendors at the same time.
Regards,
Pratap

Hello,
If you want to evaluate vendors on a large scale, the system offers standard analysis to meet with your needs. They are transactions ME6B, ME6C, and ME6D. YOU can access these transactions via the front-end SAP menu Logistics>MM>Purchasing>Master Data>Vendor Evaluation>List Displays. For details about these standard analysis
report, you can read the online documentation at SAP Liabrary>Logistics>MM>Information System>MM Vendor Evaluation>Reports and Analyses in Vendor Evaluation.
What data will be taken into account in vendor evaluation is defined by the applicability period (period in calendar days) in IMG Customizing >MM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation>Define Purchasing Organization Data for Vendor Evaluation. Note: The applicability period is not taken into account with respect to all vendor evaluation criteria. It is therefore not designed to restrict the period to a certain year.
Example:
If you enter the value 150 here, the system will take into account data from the past 150 days for vendor evaluation purposes. Data that is more than 150 days old will not be included in the evaluation process.
Next, after a configuration change, you will have to rebuild table S013 to get data before the configuration into vendor evaluation with transaction OLI3. I have attached note 64636 which describes the process of rebuilding your statistics.
Regards,

Similar Messages

Why main criteria getting zero after auto.new evaluation in ven.evaluation?

Dear experts,
while maintaining vendor evaluation in me61,after selecting auto.new evaluation the weighting of price and quality got zero.Only the delivery is getting calculated.It differs from each vendor(i.e not constant to all). why all the three main criterias are not getting calculated? Pls tel me why it is?.
Thanks in advance.

as far as I know, the Scanner uses the DecimalFormat defined for your Location - so try to insert the decimal in the localized form.
I tested your Applicaion using the german format with a ',': 10,78 on my machine (a German Windows XP) and it worked.
To avoid the endless loop, you need to clear the Scanner in the catch clause:
catch (InputMismatchException e)
System.out.println("Please enter a number!");
// get rid of old stuff
if(console.hasNext()) console.next();
...else the Scanner tries to convert its entry into a Decimal over and over again -> your endless loop.
Lars.

How do I create a new Evaluation Path in SAP

Hi
I need someone to explain step by step how I can go about having a new Evaluation Path created so that I can use it for reporting purposes in SQ01 tcode.
I have checked the various standard Evaluation Paths offered by SAP, but unfortunately they do not correspond to what I am looking for. Basically our company sometimes has cost centres which are associated to positions and in instances in which the positions are unoccupied and the cost centre becomes invalid/inactive, we need to alert the manager of those unoccupied positions to update the cost centre information. Right now I have had to set-up various reports in SQ01 to handle each step of determining who the manager of these unoccupied position is but it is cumbersome. I would like to simply build one report with a new evaluation path which can determine that information straightaway.
Here's what I believe I need in terms of an eval path KSOSP i.e.
Cost centre (K) - > Position (S) - > Org Unit (O) -> Position Chief (S) -> Holder (P)
Can anyone explain what transactions I need to build the evaluation path i.e. how to do this with the tcode and then also how to get this new eval path available for use in SQ01 reporting.
Thanks in advance.
Nicola

You have advised the Tcode OOVK but can you provide some details on how to actually create an evaluation path (per my specific details) as that's what I really need to know.
Also how does the Eval Path become available for use in SQ01 once it's created
Thanks a lot
Nicola

Copy the Existing Emp Vendor Balances to New Emp Vendor Balance

Dear all,
I am stuck in a situation where in i need to copy the Balances of the Existing Empl Vendor to the New Emp Vendor.
What i am looking for :
Existing Emp No :- E0123
Existing op Balance :- 125.00 rs
I want to Transfer the Existing Emp Vendor to New Emp Vendor
like New Emp Vendor : 4xxxx123
Existing op Balance :- 125.00 rs
How to achieve this ??
Please help.
with rgds
Ranjith Singh

Hi Ranjith,
You can copy one vendor to another using the transaction XK01
Regards
Brinda

Google search results won't open automatically new tab in firefox 6.0.2

Clicking on google search results won't open automatically new tabs in firefox 6.0.2, although it was working until today!

Did you check the Google settings via the gear icon at the top left of the Google site to make sure that you still have selected that feature?

VAT GL or withhold tax GL text (SGTXT) will be update by Vendor name automatically during posting data

Hi,
When i will execute T.code FB60 for vendor AP generate purpose then VAT GL or Withhold tax GL text (SGTXT) will be update by Vendor name automatically. Anybody there , who can help me?
Best Regards,
Tariq Russel.

Hi Tariq
We had the same requirement and we achieved through Substitution at Complete Doc level using User Exit
You can also achieve through BTE 1120
Br. Ajay M

Need to extend vendor to a new Purchasing Org

Hello All,
I am getting a flat file with existing vendors in SAP System. I need to extend these vendor to the new specified Purchase Org. and also update the fields as per in the excel file (being uploaded).
One way is to use BDC and perform the desired functionality.
Second method is to use the BAPI BAPI_VENDOR_CREATE, which again uses CALL TRANSACTION.
Is there any other method to extend vendor's (except the other 2 stated above).
Thanks in advace..!!
Regards,
Tarun

Hello,
Can be done using IDoc, by populating the various segments for basic type CREMAS05 using the new purchasing org and then passing the details to function module IDOC_INBOUND_SINGLE.
Pass the sender and receiving systems/ports both as the same.
Other alternative approach is using BDC; extending vendor using XK01 (for new purchasing org) and then update the extended vendor using XK02.
Regards,
Tarun

Is Preferred vendor approved automatically. Is preferred vendor called VL

Hi friends
Is Preferred vendor approved automatically. Is preferred vendor called Vendor List.
Regards
Surya
Edited by: surya K on Dec 29, 2008 4:03 PM

Hi Surya,
Whenevr you do "SHOP", under source of supply system will propose preferred vendor based on the list which we maintained on product level or product category level....if we not maintained these lists then system will propose you the last vendor of shopping cart.....
Thanks
Ravi

Change vendor evaluation with new scores for automatic criteria

Hi,
I would like to delete actual vendor evaluations and revaluate my vendors with new scores for the automatic criteria on time delivery.
Using the program RMEVALDL doesn't work.
Does somebody have a suggestion please ??
Thanks in advance,
Kind regards

hi,
Points scores for automatic subcriteria: The intervals for the automatic subcriteria used must be maintained, otherwise nonsensical scores may result. In addition to the F1 documentation, you should take account of SAP Note 51054. The limit values -99.9% and 99.9% must be maintained. Similarly, the invisible limit 0 must be observed.
Variance             Score
-99.9%               1
+99.9%              100
A variance of 0% brings the vendor 100 points, whereas a variance of -1% results in a score of 1 point.
check the following link.
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPSCM/KnowledgePaperVendor+Evaluation
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
regards
sumit simran

Vendor Evaluation - Creating new partial criteria

Hello,
My client wants to use Vendor Evaluation but wants to use another date to evaluate its vendors.
Is it possible to define a new partial criteria based on a date which are not the standard Confirmation date or expected receipt date and use it in automatic valuation of the principal criteria? like a date which one manages in a table Z?
Are there any user exits or Badi´s to acomplish this?
Anyone had experience with this already. How did they resolve it?
Thanks for any clue.
Aart

Use MM06L001 the user Exit for determination of ratings in vendor evaluation .

Vendor Evaluation Automatically

Dear all
        Kindly sent the related Document both configuration & end user details for Vendor evaluation.
Urgent Please.

Hi,
Vendor Evaluation for Purchasing:
Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J.
Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following
weighting shares for the standard main criteria:
Main criterion     Key 01 Key 02
Price                   1      5
Quality                 1      5
Delivery                1      2
Gen. service/support    1      1
Ext. service provision 1      2
Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items
In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and
specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or
automatically.
You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the
form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose.
Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items
Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL.
An example :-
How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria
"On-Time Delivery Performance"?
The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order
(Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances.
You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor
will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the
delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as
September 15.
In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use
the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative
effect on the score for this goods receipt.
However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30)
which the vendor will actually adhere to.
The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements
into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these
are the movement types 101 and 105.
Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time,
but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage
in Customizing.
Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on
time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is
not included in the calculation of the vendors score for on-time delivery performance. So
that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not
bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score
for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in
conjunction with quantity reliability.
Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter.
If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce
high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively
low percentage variance:
The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27;
the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days.
The system calculates the percentage variance as follows:
12 / 20 x 100 = 60
If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20%
(12 / 60 x 100 = 20).
If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via
the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the
statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
regards,
sasi

Vendor Evaluation Automatic calculation

Dear Experts ,
How can I calculate delivery and quality main criteria Automatically in Vendor evaluation.
Thanks & Regards

Hi,
Use T Code ME63 to get output by the system. Select Weighting Key and click on all logs to get the report.
- You should have some transactions done in the system.
To maintain the IMG settings :
SPRO>Material Management > Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation>
1. Define Weighting Keys (Need to define factors like Equal & Unequal )
2. Define Criteria (Need to define Criteria - Price, Quality, Delivery)
3.Define Scope of List & (Ranking)
4.Maintain Purchase Org (Maintain Values in Pur Org with Factors and their scores)
(If you have already maintained the above settings you would simply need to use Tcode ME63)
Use T Code ME63 to get output by the system. Select Weighting Key and click on all logs to get the report.
(You should have some transactions done in the system )
Hope this helps,
Amit Bakshi

Vendor evaluation - Automatic scoring method

Dear All,
With auto evaluation of vendors, I get some vendors without having any score in some main criteria i.e. Price, Quality and Delivery. What may be the reasons? How we can cross check system alloted scores?
Regards
Manoj

vendor evaluation to work in your system you need to have it integrated with other modules like QM etc. so as to get the data updated in form of scores and soem of the scores are accessed by the system from info record

Creating new Evaluation class

Hello
I m going to create a new specification for Evaluation class 2.
By just using table VC_T52DE
SO WHATS NEXT, is anythg i need to assgn and need to update anythg.
NSN

Hello
The reason behind is. We do have WT's which i had t oassgn E'CLASS with specification as
Earning and Allow
and other one is
Negative under Earnings
Which are not part of specifiction of E'class 02
NSN

Cannot start directory on a new evaluation install

I am trying to install Communications Suite 6 for evaluation, following instructions in the Sun Doc "Deployment Example: Sun Java Communications Suite 6 on a Single Host". This is on a Solaris 8 box (I was hoping I could get away with that). I have installed from DSEE.6.3.Solaris_Sparc_full, and created a Directory Server instance (dsadm create -p 389 -P 636 /var/ot/SUNWdsee/dsins1). When I try to start the instance using "dsmadm start /var/opt/SUNWdsee/dsins1 I get the following errors:
./dsadm start /var/opt/SUNWdsee/dsins1
[01/Apr/2009:15:52:39 -0700] - ERROR<4167> - Startup - conn=-1 op=-1 msgId=-1 - System error Load library /opt/SUNWdsee/ds6/lib/64
/pwdstorage-plugin.so: error ld.so.1: ns-slapd: fatal: libc.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory
[01/Apr/2009:15:52:39 -0700] - WARNING<4228> - Plugins - conn=-1 op=-1 msgId=-1 - Plugin configured as "/opt/SUNWdsee/ds6/lib/pwdst
orage-plugin.so" seems to belong to a different binary installation. Using specified path.
[01/Apr/2009:15:52:39 -0700] - ERROR<4167> - Startup - conn=-1 op=-1 msgId=-1 - System error Load library /opt/SUNWdsee/ds6/lib/64
/pwdstorage-plugin.so: error ld.so.1: ns-slapd: fatal: libc.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory
[01/Apr/2009:15:52:39 -0700] - ERROR<4140> - plugin_setup - conn=-1 op=-1 msgId=-1 - Configuration error Could not load symbol "ssh
a_pwd_storage_scheme_init" from library "/opt/SUNWdsee/ds6/lib/pwdstorage-plugin.so" for plugin SSHA
[01/Apr/2009:15:52:39 -0700] - ERROR<5255> - Bootstrap config - conn=-1 op=-1 msgId=-1 - Configuration error The plugin entry [cn=
SSHA,cn=Password Storage Schemes,cn=plugins,cn=config] in the configfile /var/opt/SUNWdsee/dsins1/config/dse.ldif was invalid
[01/Apr/2009:15:52:39 -0700] - ERROR<4122> - Bootstrap config - conn=-1 op=-1 msgId=-1 - Configuration error The configuration fil
es in directory /var/opt/SUNWdsee/dsins1/config could not be read or were not found. Please refer to the error log or output for mo
re information.
/opt/SUNWdsee/ds6/lib/64/ns-slapd -D /var/opt/SUNWdsee/dsins1 -i /var/opt/SUNWdsee/dsins1/logs/pid failed: err=1
Failed to start Directory Server instance '/var/opt/SUNWdsee/dsins1'
Is this because I am on Solaris ?

dpalix2 wrote:
I am trying to install Communications Suite 6 for evaluation, following instructions in the Sun Doc "Deployment Example: Sun Java Communications Suite 6 on a Single Host". This is on a Solaris 8 box (I was hoping I could get away with that). DSEE 6.3 is not supported on Solaris 8. I suggest you save yourself a lot of time and effort and upgrade to Solaris 10.
Regards,
Shane.

Vendor evaluation - Automatic new evaluation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for