Vendor Evaluation Price Level  For services

Hi expert, I've seen that the Main Criterion "Price" is just for materials, and I wanted to know whether there is a way of Calculating Scores for Automatic Subcriteria for services.
I also wanted to know if there is any other standar criterion for evaluating services.
Thanks !!

Hi,
Subcriteria can be defined by us as per our requirement but SAP has provided following 2 Subcriteria;
- Quality of service
- Service timeliness
For above 2 subcriteria, you can assign a scoring method as following;
C Determination from quality rating of service
D Determination from timeliness rating of service
Config Path: - SPRO > MM > Puchasing > Vendor Evaluation > Define Criteria > Here maintain subcriteria for Service criteria and assign the scoring method
At the time of processing Service Entry Sheet, under "Vendor evaln" Tab, you will have option to enter scores for the following subcriteria
- Quality of service
- Service timeliness
Once you enter scores here, it will get calculated in ME61, if automatic evaluation is configured for above 2 subcriteras
Config Path: - SPRO > MM > Puchasing > Vendor Evaluation > Define Purchasing Organization Data for Vendor Evaluation > Here for Service criteria and it's subcriteria do not activate manual maintenance indicator
And if you want to maintain values manually for Service criteria and subcriteria then activate the manual maintenance indicator in above config path and then maintain it during ME61 (Vendor Evaluation)

Similar Messages

  • Vendor evaluation - Price level

    Hi,
    pls can anybody help me to explain procedure how system calculating the sub criteria PRICE LEVEL, PRICE HISTORY , ONTIME DELIVERY,QTY RELIABILITY (Under main criteria PRICE,DELIVERY) in vendor evaluation process.
    Possible give sample calculation.
    Aparji

    Price Level
    This subcriterion compares relationship of a vendor's price to the market price. If the vendor's price is lower than the market price, he/she receives a good score; if it is higher than the market price he/she is assigned a poor score.
    On the basis of the subcriterion "Price Level" you can compare a vendor's price to the current market price at a certain point in time.
    Price History
    This subcriterion compares the development of the vendor's price with the market price.
    On the basis of the subcriterion "Price History", you can determine whether the vendor's price has increased or decreased over a certain period in comparison with changes in the market price over the same period.
    Goods Receipt
    This subcriterion is used to evaluate the quality of the material that the vendor delivers. Quality inspection takes place at the time of goods receipt.
    Quality Audit
    This subcriterion is used to evaluate the quality assurance system used by a company in manufacturing products.
    Complaints/Rejection Level
    This subcriterion is used to evaluate whether the materials delivered by the vendor are regularly found to be faulty subsequent to incoming inspection (for example, on the shop-floor) leading to additional expense and loss of time (due to loss of production, reworking etc.).
    The score (QM key quality figure) is calculated in QM Quality Management and the data passed on to MM Vendor Evaluation. This key quality figure is converted for use in the Vendor Evaluation scoring system.
    On-Time Delivery Performance
    This subcriterion is used to determine how precisely a vendor has adhered to the specified delivery dates.
    Quantity Reliability
    This subcriterion is used to determine whether a vendor has delivered the quantity specified in the purchase order.
    "On-Time Delivery Performance" and "Quantity Reliability" always have to be seen in conjunction. You can specify for each material (in the material master record) or for all materials (in the system settings) the minimum quantity of the ordered materials that must be delivered in order for a goods receipt to be included in the evaluation. This enables you to avoid a situation in which a punctual goods receipt involving only a small quantity of ordered materials is included in the evaluation with a good score for "On-Time Delivery Performance". If this minimum quantity is not delivered, the vendor is not awarded a score. However, in this case the vendor

  • Vendor Evaluation - Price level and Price Behavior

    Dear All,
         In Vendor Evaluation - What's the Difference between Price level and Price Behavior.
          On what basis these two will be calculated.
    Thanks

    Hi Siva,
    [Vendor Evaluation|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
    [Price Level|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
    [Price History or Behaviour|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
    Reward if helpful.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Naveen Dasari
    Edited by: Naveen Dasari on May 16, 2008 1:10 PM

  • Vendor evaluation - Quantity Score for Service Items

    Hi experts,
    Vendor Evaluation is active in our client system.
    There are both material and service vendors for score evaluation.
    One of the service vendors is having a Quantity Reliability (Delivery criteria) score of 100.
    Only services (item cat SERVICE) is procured from this vendor.
    The On-Time Delivery performance score is 0 (not calculated).
    Why is Quantity Reliability set to 100 if all material documents are related to service items?
    Anybody face such issue before?
    Plz provide your inputs..thanks!

    Hi.
    You need to configure Output type NAHN (Dunning).  Define condition records. Follow the same steps as you configure PO output type NEU.
    Make sure the 1st/2nd/3rd reminder days are maintained n PIR.
    These days are displayed in Delivery Tab of the PO.
    If the above output type is determined, then a standard SAP batch job automaticall ryns  ME9F to send reminders /expeditors to the vendor. You dont have to do any other config for this
    regards,
    Shashidar

  • Vendor Evaluation - Price history

    Hi
    In vendor evaluation the score for the subcriteria Price History is not getting calculated.
    The scoring method that I have used is : Automatic Determ. from Purch. Statistics: Price Behavior
    What can be the reason? How it is calculated?
    Regards

    to determine how a vendor's price for a material has changed over the last few years, the material's price history is compared with the market price history.
    The system first checks whether the buyer has maintained the current market price and last year's market price for the material.
    If not, the system uses the price for the material group to which the material belongs.
    If this price is not maintained either, the system uses the effective prices from the previous year and the current year. Prices from standard purchase orders for materials and prices from subcontract orders are dealt with separately.
    The system then calculates the percentage variance between the old and new market prices.
    The vendor's effective price is re-calculated with this percentage variance. The result represents the effective price the vendor should be asking if his price had changed over time in the same way as the market price.
    This calculated effective price is then compared with the actual effective price, and a percentage variance is determined.
    The system then awards the vendor the score you have maintained in Customizing for this percentage variance.
    The system repeats this process for all the materials you procure from the vendor. Each time you start an evaluation, the system calculates the average score for all the materials. The result is the vendor's score for the subcriterion "Price History".

  • Vendor Evaluation tab in a Service Entry Sheet

    Hi All
    I am experiencing a problem with not getting a Vendor Evaluation tab in a Service Entry Sheet, i have done all config in a screen layout for service entry sheet but no change in a screen itself.What is  surpring is that development client has vendor evaluation tab but QA client is the one that is giving me a problem even if i reset and do the transports.Please help

    Check this answered link
    [Vendor evaluation tab not appearing in ML81N|Vendor evaluation tab not appearing in ML81N]

  • How to de-activate Qty and Price fields for Service purchase requisition

    Dear all,
    We have a request to de-activate (leave it as "Display") the fields of quantity and gross price when changing a service purchase requisition of a specific document type.
    In example: We want that purchase requisition type NB, allows in change mode (ME52 or ME52N) to change the quantity and gross price of the services. On the other hand, these two fields must be only visible for order type ZNB. Besides this must be happening only for services.
    Changing PT9 or PT9B will affect also the creation, and if we only configure based on transacction and document type does not work.
    Any help will be highly appreciatted.
    Cheers

    Hi,
    You may have to write a output requirement routine and assign the same to the output type in NACE.
    But i don't think you will get the old and new data of Purchase order in requirement routine (program : SAPLV61B).  You may have to export the data into memory from either a BADI method or User exit and then import the same in requirement routine.
    Regards
    Vinod

  • Vendor Evaluation-Scoring logic for percentage

    Dear Experts,
    I have mention below %  and score of vendors for sub criteria on-time delivery,it is mention in std SAP..I want to know % value is calculated here? how negative % values is given score?
    -          100     On-time del.
    1,0       90     On-time del.
    2,0         95     On-time del.
    10,0         80     On-time del.
    20,0         60     On-time del.
    30,0         40     On-time del.
    40,0         20     On-time del.
    50,         5     On-time del.
    99,9           1     On-time del.
    -5,0            95     On-time del.
    -10,0     65     On-time del.
    -20,0     75     On-time del.
    -30,0     60     On-time del.
    -40,0     40     On-time del.
    -50,0     20     On-time del.
    -60,0     5     On-time del.
    -99,9     1     On-time del.
    Thanks,

    Hi Shyam,
    I am also looking for the same.
    can u send me the full details of the Vendor Evaluation score % calculation .
    and MANUAL, Semi Auromatic,  Fully Automatic  Evaluation. what is the difference.
    what is the function of end user for execute Vendor evaluation for all the VENDORS AT A TIME.?
    Regards,
    Anthyodaya.

  • Vendor Evaluation - calculating score for subcriteria Confirmation date

    Hi,
    I have configured vedor evaluation with subcriteria Confirmation date with B
    But while maintaing vendor evaluation ,system is not calculating score.
    As per my understanding system compares the date of inbound delivery and actual GR date.
    Can somebody help me on this how system calculates score or what is missing.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Charudatta

    Hi,
    Look at this article, it explains how it is calculated.
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
    Thanks.

  • Changing Billing Schedule Level for Service Contracts created in OM

    Hi,
    When we create a Service Contract from Order Management, the Billing Schedule Level is always set to Top Level and only one Billing Stream gets created.
    Can we get the Billing Schedule Level changed to other Levels viz., Equal Amount or Covered Level using any setups.
    Has anyone did any customization/extension to be able to change the Billing Schedule Level.
    The basic requirement is to have multiple billing streams for the contract, created from Order Management.
    Gurus, any ideas/suggestions to get this accomodated.

    Sid,
    I don't think you are on the right track (in my opinion). You are right that we can only create service contract from the order management (service or Extended Warranty Lines).
    If I understood correctly, you sell electronic subscriptions (like my internet service I have at home) and you are looking for way to take it from the order management so that you can bill it from Contracts and not from OM. As this is electronic service, looks like you do not have fulfill any tangible product (like magazines) from contracts. Hence you do not care about the schedule for the contract shipments. Is that correct?
    As this is not something Oracle offers (I did not find anyway), you may want to consider extending OM workflow or a batch program to create a subscription contract once the order line is fulfilled (not the program where we create service contract). This way you have flexibility to create the contract the way you want it.
    But you can always create a service contract covering a subscription item as covered product. Like I have internet service as subscription but they cover me for any incidental visits of technicians for this subscription charging me some amount every month.
    Thanks
    Nagamohan

  • Vendor Consignment Price Issue for short term Price Contracts with Vendors

    Hi Gurus, We are using Consignment Process successfully but very recently we faced a problem on some of our vendors who change the price every quarter.e.g. when the Buyer cuts the Consignment PO for 1000 pieces and receive it in K stock for 10$ the price is valid for 3 months in the Info record  when we start moving from K stock to Company stock after 3 months the price is changing in info record and consumption happening after 3 Months  is causing issues as you all know there is NO PO history tracking for Consignment PO's except 101k movement.we could manually do the jugglery by NOT changing the Info record untill the full 1000 qty of the PO is received but the problem is if there are multiple PO's and if the consumption is pulling stock from 2 different PO's then we have issues
    E.g. PO1 1000 Qty Info rec  validity May 1st to july 31st 10$ per piece
           PO2  500   Qty Info Rec Validity Aug 1st to Oct 31st 12$ per piece
    First consumption 411k for 800 Pcs on june 25th happens with 10 $
    Second consumption 411k for 600 Pcs happen on Sep10th will happen with 12$ but the vendor wants 200 out of 600 with 10$ and 400 with 12$ how do we handle this situation without manually changing the info record please advise
    As Consumption and settlement happens in MRKO which is totally unlinked with the PO. Is there a way we can handle the situation. There could be multiple consignment PO's which bring stock in Consignment

    Hi DP,
    As SAP doesn't Support Delivery cost settlement with the consignment process to seprate G/L ( Similar to accruals ), you need to go for Z development which while posting MRKO will be executed with refernce to PO & Issue Document Posting the freight Value to Appropriate fright G/L .
    Regards
    Manish
    Edited by: Manish Kumar on Nov 3, 2010 12:06 PM

  • Vendor Evaluation - Underdelivery Tolerance for Qty. reliability Criteria

    Hi experts.
    When using Underdelivery tolerance in a PO, the Evalation criteria Qty. reliability is not taking into account this tolerance and give a vendor a score based on the requested qty.
    It doesn't make any sense to me, since I'm allowing the vendor to deliver up to this tolerance.
    Please advice.
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    When calculating score for quantity reliability, the Minimum delivery quantity % mentioned in customizing (Txn OMGL) is only taken into account, so that if the delivered quantity is below this then the score for the vendor will not be calculated.
    The underdelivery tolerance is not checked. This is the standard functionality.
    Best Regards,
    Arminda Jack

  • Price level in vendor evaluation

    Hi,
    I have created 1st PO with price 50 and checked the ME63, system showed score for price level as 40. Then I made another PO with price 55 and checked ME63, system displayed the same score 40,
    While there is change in price of 10 %, so I was expecting score of 10 .
    Can anyone explain about this.

    Hi,
    Following is the calculation procedure for
    1) Price Level -
    If you have maintained market price for the material, the system checks vendor's price level with the market price, otherwise it compares the vendor's price with average price of material by all vendors. Then the price variance is calculated in percentage. The score is awarded for this price variance as per settings in your system configuration. This process is repeated for all the materials supplied by the vendor. The overall score is the average of all these scores.
    2) Price Behaviour -
    System checks market price / average price of the material for last year as well as for current year. System calculates the percentage change for the market price. System repeats this procedure for price of material by vendor. Then system compares these two values & calculates percentage variance. The score is awarded for this variance as per system configuration. The overall score is the average of all these scores of the materials.
    3)Online Delivry statistics -
    System calculates the difference between scheduled delivery date in PO & actual delivery date & calculates the percentage variance. The score is awarded as per settings in system configuration. This process is repeated for each P.O. & overall score is average of all these values.
    Hope the answer is helpfull. For more details, you can avail online help at site http//:help.sap.com on subject Vendor Evaluation.
    Regards,
    Prashant Kolhatkar

  • Report for Service price conditions in contracts esp. validity periods

    Hi all
    I need a report that will show validity periods against price conditions for services in a contract. Can't find anything through the menus, SAP Help, Google.
    Is there something as standard or will I need to cobble something together? The report needs to display conditions and validity periods by service / contract.
    Any ideas?
    Regards
    David

    Hi
    Thanks for those, I had already found and tried a couple of those transaction. For some reason, those transactions aren't returning any results. I can get results if I branch into the 'Conditon info' screen, but unfortunately in this case the actual service numbers aren't quoted.
    Regards
    David

  • Kindly suggest me regarding vendor evaluation (me63) score

    Dear Friends,
    I have excuted the report of vendor evaluation but here for Price criteria ( subcriteria) 40,40 are coming and some times it is 46,48 are coming. and for other criteria delivery it is 68,70 like that it is coming. kindly let me know how much is the maximum score for delivery,quality and price. and how it is distributed in standard when i have selected equal weightage
    Regards,
    Saurav

    Dear Friend,
    Kindly go through the below documents,
    Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J. Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following weighting shares for the standard main criteria: Main criterion Key 01 Key 02 Price 1 5 Quality 1 5 Delivery 1 2 Gen. service/support 1 1 Ext. service provision 1 2 Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or automatically. You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose. Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL. An example :- How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria "On-Time Delivery Performance"? The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order (Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances. You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as September 15. In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative effect on the score for this goods receipt. However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30) which the vendor will actually adhere to. The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these are the movement types 101 and 105. Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time, but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage in Customizing. Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is not included in the calculation of the vendoru2019s score for on-time delivery performance. So that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in conjunction with quantity reliability. Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter. If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively low percentage variance: The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27; the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days. The system calculates the percentage variance as follows: 12 / 20 x 100 = 60 If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20% (12 / 60 x 100 = 20). If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
    http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm

Maybe you are looking for