Vendor number in FBL3N and FAGLb03 - GRIR clearing account

Hi,
I have added a special field BSEG-LIFNR and when i run above reports, it is showing vendor number only against doc type WE and not against any other document types.
I wanted this facility to be available primarily to track GRIR account postings.
Can any one help me on this why only a particular document type shows vendor number and not the others.
Regards,
Rajanikanth

If your Purchase Orders are set up to be a 3way match then it is at the time of the Goods Receipt (WE) that the items are expensed.  So if you are looking up the expense GL account then you will only see the vendor field populated on those line items where there was a GR done.  If you are looking up GR/IR clearing account GL Accounts (usually a liability account) then the vendor field is populated for both the GR and IR transactions on those GL Accounts.  That is at least my understanding of how that field populates.  I'm not sure if there are any user exits that would allow us to change that or not.
Cindy

Similar Messages

  • Tcode F.19 and program  RFWERE00 - Analyze GRIR Clearing accounts

    Friends,
    My client requirement is to include the field WBS Element in the report - Analyze GRIR Clearing accounts (F.19).
    Also how to capture the WBS Element assigned to a PO at the time of Goods receipt in the GRIR account.
    Please do the needful.
    Regards
    SELVA

    Hi,
      I don't think that is possible using SAP Standard.
      You may try out with Enhancement concept if you are in Updated version in SAP standard or you can
      go for a Custom program if vendor designation and code is requried.
    Regards,
    Devendra.

  • Cost center assignment of GRIR clearing account

    Hello Expert,
    There is a purchase order assigned to an asset.  the cost center K8071 is maintained in the asset. Later, the cost center is changed to K8410. Normally this cost center will always be determined from the asset. But in goods receipt (MIGO) and invoice verification (MIRO) , the wrong cost center K8071 is derived for GRIR clearing account. Can i get any help from you how to solve this issue? Thanks a lot!
    Best Regards,
    Ou Qin

    Hello,
    the cost center is really assigned to GRIR clearing item. It is standard system design.  if checking GRIR line item, the cost center is filled for invoice verification of asset PO.  Seems the function of derivation exists bug.  Can any one know how to  fix such error before? Thanks!
    Best Regards,
    Ou Qin

  • GRIR clearing accounts - PO & PO line items

    Hi gurus,
    In ECC 6.0 with new GL functionality being active in TCODE FAGLL03 for all GRIR clearing accounts we would like to see purchase order and p.o line item to appear in the report.
    regards,
    rupa

    Both the fields are available i.e. Purchasing Document and Item but they are not populated...........  Let's find the reason why it's not getting populated.  I'll search and get back to you when able to find it. 
    Regards,

  • Grir clearing account

    hi,
    may i know where in customizing to define the grir clearing account so that system will automatically post to the clearing account during Goods receipt and invoice verification?
    thanks
    rgds

    hi,
    u can assign grir clearing account in OBYC in WRX transaction key,then system automatically pickup that gl
    assign points if useful
    regards

  • Vendor number for ADRMAS and CREMAS

    Dear all
    i am creating vendors in SAP using ADRMAS and CREMAS and sending both of them in a serialized manner. For ADRMAS to be linked with CREMAS, we need to provide same vendor number.
    i can get the next vendor number using the BAPI_VENDOR_GETINTNUMBER.
    I have different mappings for CREMAS and ADRMAS, so each time i get a different internal number for vendors. how do i link my idocs using the same vendor number?
    Regards
    Monika

    Hi,
    cremas and adrmas are coming form one source message right ?
    a) yes - then you can put the one ID (any) into both and get the genarated number later on on the basis of this ID in the receiver system while posting the idoc
    b) no - then they must have a different reference number inside already which you can post to SAP (in any special field - like search filed for example) - and get the correct number in the receiver system while posting idoc
    Regards,
    Michal Krawczyk

  • Vendor number in FBL3N report

    Hello Freinds,
    There is a filed in line item report FLB3N "VENDOR".
    In one of the requirement we need to populate the vendor number in a GL account.  In vendor recon account the vendor number is populated but for the other GLs involved in the transaction we require the vendor account in in the filed "VENDOR".
    Ex:  Vendor A/C  Credit ...........................   850
            Expense A/C Debit ..........................  1000
            Withholding Tax Payable Credit ........  150
    In the line item report (FBL3N for Withholding tax payable account) we want to view the vendor number in filed vendor.
    Any body please share your experience in this regard.
    Thanks & Regards,

    Hi Murli,
    Thanks for the info, i used BTE1650 its fetching offsetting account, this BTE holds good only for documents which has only 2 line items. When there are more then 2 line items in a document its not fetching correct offsetting account.
    With this BTE implementation the offsetting account is getting pupulated in GKONT in the following sequence.
    Test Case : Document entered with below line items
    Expense1 A/C Debit .......................... 500
    Expense2 A/C Debit .......................... 500
    Vendor A/C Credit ............................. 850
    Withholding Tax Payable Credit ......... 150
    For the above entry the FBL3N report for these accounts displayes offsetting account as follows
    for Expense 1 -
    offsetting account is Vendor account
    for Expense 2 -
    offsetting account is Vendor account
    for Withholding tax payable account -
    offsetting account is Expense 1
    for Vendor recon account -
    offsetting account is Expense 1
    In other words, in FBL3N is it possible to get the VENDOR (LIFNR field ) populated with value of vendor account number if a transaction involves any vendor  account.
    For example: From the test case transaction mentioned above
    In FBL3N report of
    for Expense 1 -
    the field LIFNR to should have Vendor number
    for Expense 2 -
    the field LIFNR to should have Vendor number
    for Withholding tax payable account -
    the field LIFNR to should have Vendor number
    Regards,
    Edited by: SAP_FICO on May 25, 2011 10:39 AM

  • Migrating open POs and GR/IR clearing account balance

    Hello gurus,
    I've got the following problem concerning migration of open POs:
    For example: In my source system there is a PO for 10 pcs. of some material. There has been a goods receipt for 5 pcs. (200$ each).
    Now, when I import this order and the corresponding purchase order history into my target system (using LSMW), the target system creates the order, a material document for 5 pcs. and an account document.
    But of course, our FI-team also has to migrate the balance of the 'old' GR/IR clearing account.
    So, the balance in the source system is <> 0 (e.g. 1000$), because the 5 pcs. have been delivered but there has been no invoice receipt yet.
    This balance is imported into the new system and then the open orders are migrated, generating an account document and thus, the balance is 2000$ afterwards.
    This obviously is not correct, so I am sure that I am missing something, just what?
    Thanks
    Alicia

    Hi,
    1. There will be an open PO uploaded for 5 qty and price 200$ each
    2. Opening Balance of Material - 5 qty and corresponding value to Stock A/c - 1000$
    3. Also there will be Vendor Balances uploaded in the system as 1000$ against the invoice. (If the invoice is still expected then chec with FI Users if they can get invoice form vendor)
    if no then do not upload initial stock entry of step2, create a PO of 10 qty and then do GR in system (SAP).

  • Discount in kind and GR/IR clearing account

    Hello gurus,
    we use conditions to automatically create items for discount in kind. E.g. when a user adds a new item for material A, a second item is created automatically for material B with price = 0, subitem category = 4 Discount in Kind: Exclusive Bonus Qty.
    This works fine. The problem is, that the new item is not automatically marked as a free item and so commitment documents with value = 0 are created. Additionally, there is an item created in the GR/IR clearing account for every discount item (value = 0).
    Is there any way to prevent this? I.e. stop SAP from creating the items on the GR/IR clearing account?
    Thanks in advance
    Alicia

    Hello gurus,
    ok, problem has been solved. The real problem was that accounting did not post GR for the free items as they should have. If they do, everything works ok. Otherwise MR11 is the only solution.
    Thanks anyways
    Alicia

  • Use of Maintain GRIR Clearing Account

    One of the user told me that we have to use MR11 (Maintain GRIE Clearing Account) at the period end. Let me know the use of the same and what results it will give

    MR11 is used to clear GR/IR clearing account for quantity and price differences between goods receipts and invoice receipts. Refer the link below for details. If you select delivery surplus then MR11 and check Prepare list in MR11 then it shows the documents related to Purchase orders where goods receipt has surplus in price or quantity compared to invoice receipt. If you click automatic clearance then system posts the document in system.
    Refer the link below for details
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/EN/83/dc5965f7bac64d9b3578ad3909c305/frameset.htm
    Thanks and regards
    Kedar

  • Dummy profit center and profit center clearing account being used

    Dear Gurus,
    We are implementing ECC 6.0 and will have FI PCA.
    I have 2 profit centers.(and one dummy profit center 9999)
    1)RM common
    2) FG1
    When RM is issued to production order and order is confirmed, the goods movement are 261 and 101 respectively.
    the entry at the time of confirmation is
    Discription                          Profit center
    Consumption of RM             9999
    To RM inventory                RMCommon
    FG Inventory dr                  FG1
    To Factory output account  9999
    What should actually happen is instead of 9999 consumption of RM should hit profit center RM common and instead of 9999 the factory output account should hit FG1.
    The profit center clearing account is being used for the entry in the GL view (as opposed to entry view in accounting)
    Only then will accounting treatment be correct.
    I have checked field statuses of the respective accounts and they have profit center and segment as optional fields.
    Can you suggest what may be wrong and where i need to change the splitting config.
    Regards,

    Hi
    Profit Center is derived from the assignment of Profit center in material master in costing view.
    In the production scenario,
    Consumption of raw material Dr - PC of FG
    Cr Stock of RM - PC RM
    Dr Stock of FG - PC FG
    Cr confirmation of production of the Finished goods - PC FG
    The reason for that is the production order is created with respect to the Finished Goods, master data of the production order inherits from the Finished goods.
    Regards,
    Suraj

  • Debits and credits from Clearing accounts

    FI Experts,
    We are using t-code FCKR to update the encashment date, which iti is working fine, it is updating the clearing account with the encashment date and also updating the check register to the cash account.
    However this transaction it is supposed to create debits and credits when I run the line item detail reports I don't see the postings in neither account.
    Can someone please tell me how I will be able to see debits and credits in teh clearing account and cash account, after I use the t-code FCKR?

    Hello Sheri,
    I am on 6.0 I went to the "I" con button but did not see any proceed field.
    I do see the checks in the check register that made it from the clearing account to the cash account. But I do not see it in the line item details report. When I used FCKR it run sucssesfully.
    Regards,
    Frank

  • Error during MR11 - Maintain GRIR Clearing Account

    Dear Forum,
    The users are trying to do the clearing of the unmacthed items of GRIR  thru MR11. However, the system gives the error message -
    Msg Type 'E' Msg No. 013 - Error during reading of the material XXXXX  or material locked.
    Could you please help as to what could be wrong and what needs to be done to resolve the error.
    Thanks for the help.
    Regards

    Hi,
    Close the other views pertaining to material transactions (Inventory) or master data if open prior to use MR11.
    Regards
    VG

  • Problem with document splitting and zero balance clearing account

    Hi SAP Gurus,
    We've already configured the document splitting functionality in our project, however we still encounter some issues with the outcome of posting documents. For some scenarios, the document split functionality seem to work. Below is such example
    Scenario # 1
    Entry View:
    40  Expense (cost ctr 0001)
    31  AP
    GL view:
    40 Expense (cost ctr 0001)
    31 AP (cost ctr 0001)
    However, whenever 2 GL items are included in the document, the document split functionality acts differently.
    Scenario # 2
    Entry View:
    40 Expense # 1 (cost ctr 0001)
    40 Expense #2 (cost ctr 0002)
    31 AP
    GL view:
    40 Expense # 1 (cost ctr 0001)
    40 Expense #2 (cost ctr 0002)
    31 AP (no cost ctr assignment)
    40 Zero Balance Clrg  (no cost ctr assignment)
    50 Zero Balance Clrg (cost ctr 0001)
    40 Zero Balance Clrg (no cost ctr assignment)
    50 Zero Balance Clrg (cost ctr 0002)
    I was just wondering how come the AP item did not split accordingly to the cost center indicated in the entry view. Can anyone please assist me on this one? Thanks in advance and best regards.

    Hi Milind,
    Thanks for the reply.
    I've done the below configuration and assigned cost/profit center update. It now works for profit center split. It still does not split accordingly per cost center though.
    SAP Customizing Implementation Guide > Financial Accounting (New) > Financial Accounting Global Settings (New) > Ledgers >Ledger > Assign Scenarios and Customer Fields to Ledgers
    In the below configuration, cost center is not an available option. Unlike the profit center which is available here.
    SAP Customizing Implementation Guide > Financial Accounting (New) > General Ledger Accounting (New) > Business Transactions > Document Splitting > Define Document Splitting Characteristics for General Ledger Accounting
    The profit center split looks fine now, however the cost center split still is only reflected in the expense items and not on the AP item.
    Any ideas on how to actually split the AP line items according to the cost center assignments ?
    Edited by: Patrick on May 9, 2011 7:46 AM

  • GRIR clearing not happening

    Friends,
    I am facing the following problem. Please help me out
    While GR is made, vendor number is updated agaist each line item, i.e, 'inventory debit line item' and 'GRIR clearing line item' each has the vendor number.
    But while doing MIRO,
    only the line item for 'Vendor account debit' is having the vendor number against it . The 'GRIR clearing credit' line item is not having the vendor number against it. This is creating problem. We need to configure so that the vendor number is copied against this line item also.
    Beacause of this , the GRIR clearing account is not cleared automatically.
    Can anybody suggest what is to be done so that the vendor number is also updated in the accounting document generated while posting invoice (MIRO)

    Hi,
    the standard practice is just Assignment (ZUONR) which is in turn sort key 014 (PO + line). Re vendor, see my previous post. Re business area, that should not be a problem at all as the business area should be derived from the plant which is the same in the GR and in the IR documents, so if the PO line is the same, the BA cannot be different. Same is true for material, it is either empty (service PO's) or the same in GR and IR.
    There is one more thing to mention here: if you are using goods receipt based invioce verification (flag in he PO line, Delivery tab), then the matching of the GR/IR items should not be made on PO line level (= assignment), but also based on the goods receipt document number. I.e, an invoice must be assigned to a particular GR (and not to any GR). This is typical for scheduling agreements. Pls. refer to the F1-help on the checkbox "GR/IR account special process." on the selection screen of F.13, it should explain very well how it is working. No additional setup needed here, so the above are still valid: use only ZUONR and nothing else as the clearing criteria for GR/IR accounts.
    Hope that helps, points welcome
    Csaba

Maybe you are looking for

  • K210 will not connect to secured network

    My Lenovo K210 system running Vista will not connect to a secured wireless network.  I added a Tenda, and Netgear USB wifi stick as well as a Rosewell PCI card (removing each before proceeding to the next element.).  It will see the secured network,

  • Java Signing issues when loading web start app

    Hey, not sure if this is the correct place for this - but couldn't think where else to put it... I'm a bit stuck at the moment and i wondered if anyone could shed some light on my problem, and where I might go from here. We've developed a EJB3 applic

  • 11g R2 installation on Centos 5 in virtual box

    linux_11gR2_database_1of2.zip linux_11gR2_database_2of2.zip I do have listing as above. I looked the following given by another member where he was asble to solve the problem - but I don't understand how he got these without extension zip and I get c

  • Can anyone tell me what this crash log means it came from a ipod touch 3rd Gen

    Incident Identifier: 21072E61-7F7F-4F87-AE5C-661538EDF919 CrashReporter Key:   cbfa2b73606059b80cb4d2605d8d6c054a2a4740 Hardware Model:      iPod3,1 Process:         Music~iphone [355] Path:            /Applications/Music~iphone.app/Music~iphone Iden

  • Lotus 8.5 ID Vault support?

    Hi all, is there any chance to support Lotus Domino ID Vault in Oracle Waveset (Sun IdM)? In the 8.1.1 patch 1, there is a support for Lotus Domino 8.5 (which has the ID vault feature), but no reference for this feature is contained in the readme/rel