Version compare during SPDD
Hello, We are in the process of carrying upgrade. I am using SPDD. I see some yellow lights for table indexes. For most of the table indexes, when i do the version compare i see that almost 99% of the old version are identical to the current version and need no changes to the new version. Am i doing the version comparison correctly? Do i need to create a Transport (TR) even if the versions are identical? Thanks
Hi Ricky,
It's this function and the literature says it's a valid choice during SPDD phase:
Yes, the object should get added to SPDD TR and should disappear from SPDD after refresh.
However, after reading the follwing helptext to Message no. 0M400 (I do think it applies only to using SE95 to reset, not the SPDD):
"In the Modification Browser (Transaction se95), you can reset modified objects to the original.
Caution: In the SPDD phase, you should never use SE95 to reset objects because activation is required for this. Instead, modify the object - for example, using SE11 - so that it is identical with the original object. For this purpose, use the compare option in Version Management."
you also could choose to play safe, accept the "nonexistant" Modification, and reset to original in SE95 only after you are through with SPDD and DDIC Activation and have released the SPDD TR. You'll record the resets to original in another TR then.
Reset to original is also possible only if you do have the original in the system; use menu Modifications->Display Original to verify that.
cheers
Janis
Similar Messages
-
Hi,
We are doing the upgrade from SAP R3 4.6C to ERP 6.0, during SPDD phase we are getting errors while adjusting table VBAP. If you go to tcode SE14 there it is not allowing us to activate and adjust database. While activating the table it throws the error message as "Table VBAP could not be activated - E- Table VBAP ( error adjusting the database)"
Thanks in advnace.You will need to find out, why it can´t be activated, you will get lots of subsequent errors if you ignore that.
Markus -
Function module for Version compares in different systems
Hi,
Can you let me know which function module would provide me with the version compare log.
i need this comparison log to be generated internally by my program.Hi,
I debugged what the Std does in version comparison. It basically calls :
the FM : SVRS_SHORT2LONG_NAME
for both the programs to be compare and passes the values to
the Report : RSVRSRS3
Set a break-point within the Form : compare_versions in the include : LSVRLF04
and check how the values are getting populated.
Cheers,
Remi -
What are the enhancements of ECC5.0 version compared to 4.6c
HI
what are the enhancements of ECC5.0 version compared to 4.6cWith a little experimentation, I've discovered a number of useful things about iTunes in the past few weeks. Most important is that the iTunes folder (remembering to remove the iTunes music first) can actually be backed up to another drive, and then even shared with another computer directly. Very simple and effective.
-
Passing application version info during .jar/.class creation
Is there a 'best' way to supply version info during the application build process so that it is then available at runtime? I use make to build a jar file that then is released. I'd like to be able to provide a release/version number when I build that the user can then access via an 'About' dialog. In 'C', I use preprocessor directives passed via the make command line but I can't see how Java might support this method. Any and all help appreciated...
Thx, JennetteAn Ant script might do stuff like that.
-
Problem in Pointbase databse version update during JES 2005Q4 Installation
I am installing JES 2005Q4 on Solaris 10
During component selection under Sun Java System Aplication Server Enterprise Edtion 8.1, subcomponents Pointbase Database and Sample Applications are in conflict with the version.
Please let me know if there is any suggestion in that line
-gothamIs this first time you are attempting to install application server? or Do you have any installation on the system from prior versions?
This normally happens when the prior version of components or any incomplete installatation are found on the system.
You can run the uninstaller from '/var/sadm/prod/SUNWentsys4' to clean up any partial / incomplete installations from the system. (In case, You've attempted to install something before). -
Prod Version Slection during conversion of planned order to production orde
Dear Experts,
I have two BOM for a semi finished product. I have created two production version for the same. After MRP run, it created planned order for BOM1. This is fine.
My requirement is, when I convert the planned order to production order, it should ask for selection of production order as it ask while creating the production order using CO01. I know that I can select the alternate prodution version by reading the PP master data. Can system ask for selection of production order while converting the planned order to production order.
Thanking You,
ChetanDear Chetan,
If you have manual selection of production version set in OPL8 and if you have set the BOM selection method as 2 in
MRP 4 view of the material master then,
1.If you create a production order manually then the system displays the pop up to select a production version.
2.If you are converting the planned order into a production order then it picks up the one which is
present in the planned order.So obviously if 2 production versions are there with same lot size and
validity dates,then the system picksup the first one only during MRP run.
Even if it picks up the first prod.version in planned order,but while converting click on master data and
change the production version if required.
3.Otherwise what you can do is set the production version in MD61 itself ,so that its going to be
considered during MRP run.
Check out and revert back.
Regards
Mangalraj.S -
Map version update during Jan 13 ?
Hi all
I use maps on my 5800XM (I have v3.06 11wk10b01), and periodically check for updates using the in-app "Check for updates" button. I recall updating the map version some time last year, but since then every time I try it says I already have the latest version (can't remember what no. that was). When I try now, it says I have the latest version (00.02.46.103) but quotes a release date of 9/1/2013. Now, last time I updated it took around two hours of faffing around, and I certainly did not do that during January. Was there some kind of "silent update" ? If so it's not a good update because I can easily find bits of map that are several years out of date. Or has something gone wrong, and it thinks it's updated itself but hasn't really ? How do I find out whether I've got the latest version if I can't trust the "Check for Updates" facility ?
Thanks.
Solved!
Go to Solution.Actually an update was released sometimes during December, 2012 which was version 00.02.47.103. But there was a major issue with that update as Offline Navigation was not possible. Nokia released another ROLL-BACK update (v 00.02.46.103) on 09.01.2013 which is the same as one released in May, 2012 ..so you may not find any changes from what you already had.
Refer THIS -
Shocked by lack of features on Mac version compared to Windows. Why?
Just downloaded Premiere elements 11 and shocked to find that the full set of features are not supported on the mac version, most notably the chroma, green and blue keying effects/ filters. Why is this?? I use a mac not as a fashion statement, but because they are the industry standard for creative businesses. ALL photographic, graphic design, editing etc suites use macs, so why give these features to windows and NOT macs? Makes absolutely no sense at all and I am shocked not to mention disappointed!!
There are differences between the Mac and PC platform, and not just with Premiere Elements, but also Premiere Pro. The PC gets more Effects, and Transitions. This was first noted in Premiere Pro CS 3, when it was ported to the Mac. Before, with Premiere Pro 1.0, through CS 2/verson 2.0, the program was PC-only. When PrPro CS 3 was introduced, the Mac-users took note that their PC friends got more than they did.
At that time, there were many posts to the PrPro Forum, regarding the differences. Adobe engineers commented on the differences between how the two platforms handled some aspects of the program - and mainly display functions. This list of Effects & Transitions in CS 3, for Mac and PC, will show what was different between those two platforms: http://forums.adobe.com/thread/460313?tstart=1470 [Note: this was for PrPro, and it has/had many differences, from PrE, so this is not a clear difference chart between PrE for the Mac and the PC, but you can get the idea. It is for background reference use only.]
Something similar happened, when PrPro went from CS 4 to CS 5, which was a 64-bit program ONLY. A lot of Effects and such were lost in the new version, and some were "old stand-bys" for users of the earlier program. In time, a few DID show up in later versions of PrPro, but not all. Some were 32-bit only, and Adobe deemed it too expensive to port all of them to 64-bit, so they were just dropped, and have never reappeared. The same thing happened with many 3rd party plug-ins. Once, they were all 32-bit, and that worked up until CS 5. Most suppliers then went back to the lab, and recoded their plug-ins for 64-bit, but not all. Some just dropped their support for PrPro.
While this does not help you get your job done (ATR's blog post will, however, and that was also why I suggested other Effects for Keying), it shows that PrE is not alone with the differences between platforms.
Good luck and happy editing,
Hunt -
TP version problem during upgrade from 4.7 sr2 to ECC6
Hello All,
i am doing an upgrade from 4.7 to ECC6 (ultimately i have to upgrade to EHP4). I am stuck in phase PREPARE module Initialization finished with status failed #. Below is the error i am getting. before pasting log file i tried my best to uprade TP level by upgrading the Patch level. but its not taking effact in to SAP system. If i check TP version in STMS >> system >> Check TP tool it shows me old version.
below is the error log excerpt from file CHECKS.LOG
#====================================================#
Requests and information for module Initialization #
#====================================================#
ERROR: The upgrade needs a patched version of R3trans which is
build on 21.06.06 or later.
The R3trans in your active SAP kernel is either older or
the version could not be determined. Call it without
any option to determine the build date.
If the build date is too old, you have to replace it
before you can continue the upgrade.
Download the latest executable available from the SAP service
market place and update it before you continue.
Otherwise, the upgrade tools will be corrupted.
INFO: The version check of the disp+work in your active SAP kernel
determined that it has a sufficient level.
No update of disp+work is necessary.
ERROR: The upgrade needs a patched version of tp with version
number 340.16.05 or higher.
The tp in your active SAP kernel is either older or the
version could not be determined. Call it without any option
to determine the version.
If the version is too old, you have to replace it before
you can continue the upgrade.
Download the latest executable available from the SAP service
market place and update it before you continue.
Otherwise, the upgrade tools will be corrupted.
ERROR: To be able to use ASU Toolbox, your system requires
the ST-PI software component with at least Support Package Level 8
After the update is done, the module must be repeated!
For more information, see the upgrade documentation
INFO: The upgrade strategy for the addon ABA_PLUS
is described in note: 632429
INFO: The upgrade strategy for the addon APPINT
is described in note: 632429
INFO: The upgrade strategy for the addon BP-R3PF
is described in note: 632429
INFO: The upgrade strategy for the addon FINBASIS
is described in note: 438521
INFO: The upgrade strategy for the addon LSO
is described in note: 503468
INFO: The upgrade strategy for the addon LSOFE
is described in note: 503907
INFO: The upgrade strategy for the addon PI
is described in note: 700779
INFO: The upgrade strategy for the addon PI_BASIS
is described in note: 555060
INFO: The upgrade strategy for the addon SLL_PI
is described in note: 1306751
INFO: The upgrade strategy for the addon ST-A/PI
is described in note: 69455
INFO: The upgrade strategy for the addon ST-PI
is described in note: 539977
INFO: The upgrade strategy for the addon WP-PI
is described in note: 632429
#===========================================================#
PREPARE module Initialization finished with status failed #
#===========================================================#
i downloaded the 47 kernel files SAPEXEDB_304-20001172.SAR and SAPEXE_304-20001172.SAR and installed the kernel file. if i check TP version from command level it shows me 340.16.62, but in SAP STMS it shows me 340.16.03. Can somebody explain what shoulkd i do?
Can i know also if i can update SAP Kernel from 4.7 sr2 to NW7.0 without upgrading even started?
If somebody can tell me the exact number of CDs to use to upgrade from 4.7 SR2 to ECC6 EHp4, that would be very
nice.
ManiHi Mani,
ERROR: The upgrade needs a patched version of R3trans which is
build on 21.06.06 or later.
ERROR: The upgrade needs a patched version of tp with version
number 340.16.05 or higher.
show that the tp and R3trans used by the source 470 system are old.
You should download the latest tp and R3trans for kernel 470, and
replace the old tp and R3trans with the downloaded ones under the 470 kernel directory. The 470 kernel directory is specified by parameter DIR_EXECUTABLE which is usually /usr/sap/<SID>/SYS/exe/run.
Please note that there is also a kernel directory under /<DIR_PUT>/<SID>/SYS/exe which is for the the target system 700. Please do not replace tp and R3trans under this directory with the ones downloaded for kernel 470.
NO, you cannot update SAP Kernel from 4.7 sr2 to NW7.0 without upgrading even started. Kernel upgrade will be done by SAPup automatically.
With Best Regards
Julia -
How do you view the code differences for .java files versioned in a web dynpro project? They are not in the src fiolder for either active or inactive DC. I do see they are under the gen_wdp folder but the version tools are disabled there.
This I am assuming as a very common practice but I see nothing in the SAP help. I am using release SP18 of dev studio.Hi Mike,
The files like TimeEntryView.wdcontroller also have java code in them. This is used while generation. You can use same tool to check differences here for the code also.
You can do one more thing. [ This is a bit tedious:) ]
Take the generated java file in gen_wdp folder and use tools like "WinMerge" to check the difference. [Not a gr8 idea but works ]
Regards,
Ashwani Kr Sharma -
"Missing InfoCube 0COPA_C01 in Version A" during migration to BI7.
Hi,
I get "Missing InfoCube 0COPA_C01 in Version A" error message when trying to migrate ZCOMP_CODE Object ( in RSEC_MIGRATION program) when migration from BW3.5 to BI7.0.
Does anybody have an idea how I could fix this issue.
Thanks,
Sruthi.Hi Sruthi,
I came across a similar problem.You need to activate the Business Content ( all info providers, infocubes, ODS objects ) related to the Authorization objects you are trying to migrate from BW 3.5 to BI 7.0.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Kiran. -
How to compare variant(Version compare)
Hi experters.
Can you tell me how to compare variant between DEV and QA system?
I find the transaction variant in my DEV system is a little different from QA system,
so I want to compare them, but there are too many fields..
so can you tell me how to compare them ? is there any easy way to do it?
Regards,Hi Harry,
Me too did not come across such tool, report which compares 2 variants in 2 systems. ALthough i dont have an answer - felt like sharing and would be good if you come across any such info...
( Also the usage of such tools will be very less how frequent do we get to do that )
Rgds,
Sri
Award points for helpful answers -
[solved] gcc version error during update
I'm trying to do a full system upgrade but whenever I start it I get the below error ":: gcc-gcj: requires gcc=4.5.1" although it appears I have gcc version 4.5.1 any ideas on what might be causing this?
oli / $ sudo pacman -Syu
:: Synchronizing package databases...
core is up to date
extra is up to date
community is up to date
archlinuxfr is up to date
:: Starting full system upgrade...
:: Replace pycairo with extra/python2-cairo? [Y/n]
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: gcc-gcj: requires gcc=4.5.1
oli / $ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.5.1
Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Last edited by cani (2011-01-27 16:24:39)Remember where you got gcc-gcj from?
That's your problem. Not GCC. Check your error again, and read where it says
:: gcc-gcj: requires gcc=4.5.1
There's little point in checking the gcc version prior to the upgrade. You're querying the installed gcc, and that will always be the version gcc-gcj needs. The whole upgrade, in fact, chokes because the new gcc will not be 4.5.1 anymore.
Please use code tags for output of commands run in a terminal. -
Hi all,
maybe a stupid question but is there an easy way to compare a set of objects between systems (BWD and BWP). My predecessor had SAP-ALL in both boxes and so things are a bit out of wack. I guess BWD is accurate and BWP may be the same.
Is the only way to collect and transport from BWD to BWP? If so what settings should I use? How to I transport custom ABAP used for processing flat files?Hi Barnaby,
I Guess BWD & BWP are your systems ? BWD for <b>D</b>evelopment environment, and BWP for <b>P</b>roduction ?
I think you will need abaper's advices...
Maybe you are looking for
-
General Ledger Report Criteria Selection
Hi, just a general question in regards to running the general ledger report. I would have thought the expanded button would be user specific, as it is not it means that each user has to check and change the selection for each report incase someone e
-
From IDOC to Multiple Oracle tables Structure
Hi Guys, I am doing a one Senario which is Custom idoc and Custom Tables of oracle they both have same fields and Same Sturucte does it possible from to do 1:1 mapping shall i process these in 1:n.Need a sugestion in these How i can slove these prob
-
Reg:Delivery complete indicator for service PO
Dear all, I have configured delivery completed incator for the specific field selection group for the particular plant for service PO's also i have activated in inventory management the same indicator for that plant but for service PO document type i
-
Boolean Parameter issue in utl_url.escape
Hello, I am trying to use below query with 2nd parameter as TRUE but I'm getting below error. select utl_url.escape(url => 'http://www.sample.com/ümlat.php&\^#q=name', escape_reserved_chars => TRUE) from dual; Error: [Error] Execution (16: 100): O
-
HANA SID naming "best practice"
Hi, We are about to implement some HANA's as databases for Netweaver systems. Any recommendations on what SID's to give the HANA systems? The same as the Netweaver system for which it is a DB servers perhaps? (you will now have duplicate SIDs registe