Video card news and CS5 / MPE

With the upcoming launch of CS5 and the Mercury Playback Engine, this may be interesting.
Side note: We do not yet know whether FERMI cards will be supported.
The GTX480 has simply the fastest GPU. An average speed gain of about 15 percent from the HD 5870. The ATI costs around $ 400, while for Nvidia's latest about $ 500 is to be paid. So far there is not anything remarkable, because in hardware land there is a premium for the fastest of the fastest in our homes.
The HD 5970 throws a spanner in the works. This dual-GPU card actually leaves the GTX480 in the dust, the performance of ATI's top model is on average around 35 percent better. The HD 5970 is again one hundred U.S. dollars more expensive than the GTX480, but both the HD 5870 and HD 5970 offer more performance per dollar.
There are obviously more factors than price-performance ratio. The GTX480 however loses when it comes to energy usage, even when the benefits are taken into consideration. Indeed, energy consumption is only marginally lower than that of the faster HD 5970. The associated noise is also a drawback; here the HD 5870 and HD 5970 cards are the clear winners.
Then there's more to be considered. AMD now has the Eyefinity technique with which three displays can be controlled. Nvidia counters with 3D Surround Vision: this could also be driving three screens, but there are two graphics cards in sli needed. With three 120Hz displays it is even possible to provide three displays of 3D images.
Prospects appear bleak for the GTX480, but the card can not be discarded - at least not until the GTX480 is in the shop and the actual price is clear. If retail prices are slightly below the recommended price, while the HD 5870 prices are kept artificially expensive because of high demand, Nvidia's latest offer may be a good option. Nvidia has already stated that the cards will be fully stocked from April 12. In the more distant future may be Nvidia can improve drivers and  yields, which can push down the price further and further to improve performance. How much performance gain the card can achieve is the question. Who wants the fastest of the fastest can better invest in the HD 5970.
Now the question arises:
Assuming MPE will support the FERMI cards, which one is better:
1. The ATI HD 5970 is fastest but does not benefit from CUDA and supports DX11
2. The GTX 285 is much slower but benefits from CUDA and supports DX10
3. The GTX 480 is slower than ATI and may benefit from MPE and supports DX11
These are interesting times for all that want to change their graphics cards. The waiting is for some benchmark tests to shed some light on what is ahead for us.
And let's hope Adobe extends the MPE option to include ATI cards...

the specs on the HP systems are pretty weak.
a Xeon 3503? no such thing.. do you mean 3530?
a Xeon 3530 is the exact same thing as a Core i7 930
ECC ram will slow the system down and is not needed
8 gig ram is wrong for a 1366. it needs to be triple channel so 6 or 12 gig.
bare minimum is 3 hard drives.
as mentioned that video card is a joke. HP has a bad habbit of selling low budget card or very expensive cards.
dont buy into the "quadro" name and this all is well.
better to buy from a custom NLE builder
Scott
ADK

Similar Messages

  • Msi video card n240gt and n9800gt problems with output HDMI

    Hello to all
       I have a problem I just bought a new Video card because I needed HDMI output. The previous card I have is a BFG Ge Force 8800GT 512 DDR2 running @ 1920x1080p 60Hz which works perfectly the only downside is it does not have HDMI out with 5.1. Now i installed the n240GT 512 DDR5 and tried watching BD ripped to the HDD and playing them back  all i get now it jerking lagging bad also and have horizontal red and green lines scattered across the screen.Which i did not have with my 8800GT card thinking  its  a bad card so i bought another card from another dealer this time its a MSI  N9800GT 1gig DDR3 and still the same problem.I Checked the resolution and its set to 1920x1080P refresh at 60Hz,i also changed the  Hz to 24Hz and it cleaned up the lines but not all and picture still  jerky picture. I have a MSI K9N NEO V3 Motherboard and all drivers updated current Bios. l used a DVI cable 40ft long with my Ge Force 8800GT and every thing worked fine, once I installed the new MSI Video cards N240gt and N9800GT I have the above problems and using a 50FT HDMI cable. I have a Samsung PN50A550 with 3 HDMI inputs 1 has my BluRay player hooked up with HDMI running at 1920x1080P at 60Hz and crystal clear picture no problems, input 2 has my HD Bell receiver running at same specs as input 1 no problems I tried the other HDMI inputs from the Samsung TV  from the HDMI out from the card same thing. It has to be the cards that can`t support the TV what else can it be if not the MSI cards. Please respond ASAP Thanks Thumpalong

    http://www.overclock.net/t/936561/psu-rating
    You may want to borrow and test with another PSU.
    We always recommend Corsair and Seasonic
    I can't find anything on Topower other than that opinion piece of linked... getting frustrated. Most of the time I can find detailed info on most psu's not this time, so best to borrow and test.
    Assuming of course that the older VGA's worked fine.

  • What is a video card? And what requirements do you need to have the newest version of iMovie?

    What is a video card? And what requirements do you need to have the newest version of iMovie?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_card
    http://support.apple.com/kb/ht5842 Maverick requirements.

  • Video card decision for CS5

    Hi all.
    I have just purchased CS5 Production Premium, and am trying to decide on the Nvidia GTX 285 or the Quadro FX 3800. We are moving from SD to HD footage and outputting to MiniDV, Beta SP or DVD for broadcast TV.
    Would anyone care to give me a quick comparison of these two cards from experience, or even just thoughts on your experience with either card? My current setup with CS4 and the GTS250 just won't cut it with HD, as it takes forever to render anything. I don't have the time or patience to just sit and wait....
    Thanks a lot.
    Keith

    Keith,
    In theory more cores should be faster, but we have not yet seen that during our testing. It may be the immaturity of CUDA/MPE support. One system was tested with both the 285 and the 480 and there was no discernible difference, despite double the cores.
    In theory more memory should be faster because it reduces the latency of RAM - GPU - RAM transfers, but again, no hard data yet. We have seen the negative effect of dual processors versus single processor on MPE rendering however, due to the latency introduced by dual processor systems.
    There is not much difference between the various suppliers, Asus, EVGA, Gigabyte, MSI, PNY, POV, etc. so the choice is based on specific features one may have over the other in terms of better cooling, quieter fan, longer warranty, better price, higher clock speed, more memory and the like. Use customer reviews on sites like Newegg to find which ones are liked.
    The law of diminishing returns may apply to video cards as well. Theoretically the 480 will be faster than the 470, but if the difference in cores will compensate the difference in price and seconds gained is something to be seen.

  • Will these video cards work with CS5?

    Will any of these video cards work with Premiere GPU?
    GeForce GT 640
    GeForce GTX 650
    GeForce GTX 660 Ti
    GeForce GTX 670
    GeForce GTX 680     
    Thanks
    Brandon

    Yes, provided they have at least 1 GB VRAM. See for instance http://ppbm5.com/MPE%20Charts.php or http://ppbm5.com/DB-PPBM5-2.php
    Select Video Card / GeForce 600 Series and sort on the column header. There are no 640 cards yet.

  • Video Card Upgradeable and Video card drivers?????

    Hello apple community. I frequently use my intel 20" imac for games by using Bootcamp (IT OWNS!!!!) to switch to Windows XP. I have been running Steam games with about 40-50 fps on all high settings except anti aliasing is set at x8 CSAA instead of the max, x16 CSAA. I know my graphics card can get more frames than x8. I blame the drivers. Where can I find good ATI drivers?
    Also, I want a new video card, but is it possible to upgrade your video card on the imac? is it really soldered on to the motherboard????

    Are there any news or updates to this? I'm thinking of buying the 24" iMac which sports an ATI HD 2600 Pro video card, but as AMD/ATI has revealed, they will be releasing the HD 3850 and 3870 in mobile versions soon and so I wonder if iMac will get an upgrade to these in stock or if I can do an upgrade myself after I buy it, or while I configure it in the Apple Store (or at a local Apple retailer).
    I currently have a home-built PC and use it mostly for casual gaming, programming and graphical stuff (Adobe, typically). I'd love to have an iMac to do all of these things on, but the video card is currently a bit behind in terms of raw performance; otherwise the 24" iMac is a great machine. So I'd love to upgrade the video card, however it's possible (if it is), or at least get an indication of when the HD 2600 will be replaced with a HD 3870 or 3850. Does anyone know?

  • Video Card for Photoshop CS5

    Hi,
    I'm deciding between these two cards (I do not want to spend more than 70/80 bucks as I might be selling the PC in some time):
    http://www.amazon.com/GeForce-ENGT430-DC-SL-1GD3/dp/B0051UWKUW/ref=wl_it_dp_o_npd?ie=UTF8& coliid=I3KL9BC6YWAB99&colid=F5P3DUM50O0I (US$ 70)
    http://www.amazon.com/EAH6570-1GD3-LP-Radeon-Video/dp/B004X8EOB6/ref=wl_it_dp_o_npd?ie=UTF 8&coliid=I2P1Y17T0IZJPH&colid=F5P3DUM50O0I (US$ 81)
    I would want it to be fanless (one of the main reasons I'm focusing on the GT 430) and not bigger in height than these posted, and preferably made by Asus or some other good brand.
    At the time I have an onboard Intel GMA X4500HD (which uses my Ram; I have 6GB - and I have an Core2Duo 3GHz 6MB Cache), but I'm having trouble moving various layers at the same time (this file I'm working on for instance weighs 30MB and has "many" layers and folders, but nearly no images; it's all text and vector shapes, and some Smart Objects).
    When I move 3/4/5 folders (with layers in it) at the same time it drags quite a lot. Would this have to do with the graphics card? It's the only reason I could think of, because the processor is quite powerful, I have more than enough Ram (ddr3), and I even have a scratch disc that is not the main Hd.
    Many thanks in advance!
    Jimmy
    PD: I'm working on Windows 7 64bit

    I opened a file I have with a lot of layers grouped into a number of groups, and many of the layers have effects.  A relatively complex document.
    When I select a whole bunch of the groups then use the move tool, yes, I see the screen update response slow down.  In my case, with a fairly powerful workstation and a decent video card it updated the screen about twice a second - a bit laggy but still quite acceptable.  I guess that's to be expected as the previews have to be made up of the combination of a huge number of pixels from all those tens or hundreds of layers in various ways.
    Based on what I see, it's not hard to imagine including even more layers in a more complex document to cause things to slow down even more.  I guess one just has to be patient if working on a document that deep in layers.
    Note that there are settings in the Edit - Preferences - Performance dialog that optimize the History & Cache values for "Tall and Thin" documents, where "tall" means "lots of layers".  If you make changes there to experiment, remember to close and reopen Photoshop to test them.
    -Noel

  • VIDEO CARDS QuadroFX4500 and RADEON  X1900 won't work

    I have the TWO VIDEO CARDS AND CAN'T RUN VIDEO WITHOUT IT GETTING STUTTERING VIDEO. LOOKS LIKE NOT ENOUGH MEMORY. WITH JUST THE 4500 ATTACHED TO 2 30 INCH APPLE MONITORS I WOULD GET A HORIZONTAL LINE ABOUT 1/3 FROM THE TOP OF THE SCREEN. SWITCH DVI'S AND IT APPEARS ON THE OTHER MONOTOR, SO ITS NOT THE MONITORS. USED THE HARDWARE DISC AND THE LINE SHOWS UP WHEN YOU START. HAVE HAD THE $500 REPLACED TWICE BECAUSE APPLE SAYS THATS THE PROBLEM BUT THE LINE STAYS. NEVER MIND I CAN'T CONNECT THE OTHER 2 30 INCH APPLE MONITORS WITHOUT EVERYTHING SLOWING DOWN. I HAVE ONLY APPLE SOFTWARE ONE THE 07 MACPRO WITH 6GIGS OF DRAM AND TWO HARD DRIVES 500 GIGS AND 750 GIGS and one 750 external Seagate hard drive.

    Sorry, didn't realize till later,I wasn't looking. No they never worked together. Actually I first had a nVidia GeForce 7300 GT from apple to go with the 4500, but it still sits in a box, was completely incompatible or pooched???. The Quadro 4500 always gave me a horizontal line when only two 30 inch Apple monitors were hooked up.Its been replaced a couple of times, still the horizontal line remains. Recently I acquired the X1900 thinking the dual dvi output could run one more 30 incher and one single link out to my 55 inch plasma(a dream I once had). I can get slideshows from Aperture to run, but no full screen video. It slugs along skipping every few frames. My 2 year nightmare continues. Thanks for your inquiry though maybe you know what is or should I say isn't happening. This is my second computer since my Commodore Vic-20. The first one was a G5 fully loaded that blew up 3 weeks after its arrival and finally was returned for my current Macpro. Thank you Applecare! I'm a very frustrated Newbie.

  • Problems importing the same clips from diferents cards  IMAC and CS5

    Hi, I'm having trouble importing my clips recorded in The ex1, I'm using CS5 with an imac, The problem is that when I import the same clips recorded in two cards, the second card comes exactly with what is inside the first card.  It does not have what was originally in it, it just copies what was on the first card or vice versa.  But the original folder in my drive is intact with the two cards intact. The problem is when I import it to CS5 on IMAC.  When i import the video the imac makes a long file with all the clips an puts them together except the clips from the previous card, it shows but with the same video that is in the begining of the second card or the last clip recorded in the second card .I tried to import the clip again from the first card and it comes with the same video from the second card again.

    1) Don't know why this is happening. It may have something to do with
    I downloaded from iCloud the same library I was working with
    I'm not clear what procedure you're using here. Using a cloud for storage might change some file tags. Generally users I think keep the library on the same drive as the media, keeping the library backups on the system. There is no real benefit in keeping the media in a separate location. Often users will keep the library in the same folder as the media. It makes backing up using tools like Carbon Copy Cloner very efficient.
    1a) This can be difficult to find as there sometimes is no obvious indicator. It might be a missing element in a compound clip, a missing or altered layer in a graphics file, a missing font, a missing effect. These will show up inside the item involved, but may not be apparent in the browser. A missing transition for instance will not be seen until you skim over the project or try to export it.
    2) The 43 MB is a small amount of optimized media. This never prevents relinking. The library is always looking for original media, or proxy media if you're in proxy playback. It never looks for optimized media. If it has it, it uses it, if it doesn't, it uses the original media. If you are using original/optimized playback, you must have the original files. The optimized files are not enough.

  • Optiplex 9020, Intel 4600 + AMD video card = bluescreens and other issues for dual monitors

    Our organization purchased a number of 9020s with the onboard Intel and the AMD 8490
    Over time, many of these systems would experience video issues.  Originally they were configured with one monitor was plugged into the intel VGA and the 2nd monitor was plugged into the AMD DVI. output
    Among the issues were bluescreens.  When dragging something from one monitor to another, there would either be another bluescreen or other graphical glitches.  Despite uninstalling/reinstalling both drivers these issues would persist.  Eventually we tried moving both monitors to the Intel outputs,  issue still persisted, then we tried moving all the monitors to the AMD ports,  issue still persisted.   Eventually we removed the AMD card entirely.   That seems to have corrected the graphics issues.    That being said, I don't think the issue is faulty hardware,  about a dozen systems have exhibited this issue so I am doubting that each one of them all have faulty hardware.   I suspect a driver problem somewhere.  The Intel driver and/or the AMD driver don't seem to play well with each other.   
    This issue has persisted across both the AMD 8490 and the AMD R7 250 cards.
    Our organization is locked into certain configurations, so at present, we are unable to order PCs without the extra card.   The extra card hasn't been needed once onboard cards started gaining the ability to do multiple monitors.

    Win7 64 bit.  We haven't had the blue screen in a while so I don't have the specific message, but it did reference an AMD file.  Drivers have been uninstalled/reinstalled numerous times.
    Latest issue is that when the user steps away from the computer and the monitor goes into powersave after 30 minutes, when the user returns the monitors will turn on, but the screen stays dark.

  • Why does Firefox 4 not open video files (news and youtube) at all, but Firefox 3 and MSIE 8 open these video files quickly, all on my Dell Dimension 8250 desktop with MS Windows XL Pro?

    I subscribe to an Earthlink package of telephone and ISP through DSL in Dallas, Texas. To avoid the congestion (time outs and files not found) of the virtual "cloud" servers, as a workaround I connect to the Internet through dial-up on each session on my pc. There is only one pc or computer on my local network. I downloaded Firefox 4 RC and it failed (would not open video files on the Internet), so I removed the Firefox 4 RC program from my pc, and then I downloaded and installed Firefox 3.6.16, which works fine.
    My operating system is Windows XP Pro.

    Try disabling hardware acceleration. Many visual bugs can be attributed to issues with graphics drivers.
    (Firefox -> Options -> Advanced -> General -> [ ] Use hardware acceleration when available)

  • Disable video card driver and use generic VGA

    Is there a way to just use a generic VGA driver for the macbook pro? I'm having problems with my macbook pro regarding display issues and crashing. It works fine in safe mode, which disables the ati video driver. Is there a way to have the macbook pro disable the default video driver and just use a 2d accelerated generic driver?
    Thanks

    https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Bumblebee

  • Thermaltake Giant II Video card cooler and you.

    Hi all,
    i was just looking my favorite retail store's web site, and i found that they are selling the Giant II vid card cooler.
    And I was wondering if anyone that owns that cooler could share his experience with it, like: vid card that is using it, change in temps., audio levels, space, etc..
    So any answers would be appreciated.  )
    Bye

    PLEASE HELP!!...
    TELL YOUR EXPERIENCE IF YOU HAVE A GEFORCE FX 5X00 CARD, DOESN'T MATTER WHAT MODEL YOU HAVE!!.
    HELP!

  • MB 915/G Combo MS-7058 video card options or suggestions on the new market

    First off my apologies. I wasn't sure which forum to place my question under,
    Retired Motherboards or Video Cards.
    Quick summary I'm looking to upgrade my video card on an older mother board and have run into problems with a new board working. I think the problem is a backwards compatibility issue.  I need help  with a list of what video cards I can buy that are available new preferably if not a list of where to go and what to watch for. I would like to increase the speed/ram. My skill level is around, open the case swap out the item and insert the disk. With a search forums and try to find the answer/follow directions or suggestions.
    In more detail,
    I'm looking to upgrade my video card from NVIDIA GeForce 6 Series  NX-6600  256mb card on a an MSI 915P/G combo. The install/instruction manual lists under the above combo name MS-7058 (v1.X) ATX Motherboard and  below the image of the board there is also the text of G52-M7058x1. 
    The video card option for placement is in the sole PCI Express X16 slot (no on motherboard graphics and/or connection options I know of)   and I assuming from what I've tried researching that the PCI Express x1(mentioned elsewhere but all suggestions were cards no longer for sale) is some sort of standard of limit and my motherboard is too old despite newer cards fitting into the slot and claiming backwards compatibility to the "PCI Express or Pci Express 2.0". 
    Part of that possible assumption of my issue comes from the fact the mother board can have ether DDR1 or DDR2 ram for memory  but a video card with DDR3 ram would not work. Also the software from the included disk and from the from the website install correctly for the card to function other than the basic windows drivers leaving the card unable to run any games.   For reference the video card purchased and tried was a  EVGA Geforce GT 610 SC9super clocked) with 2 GB of DDR3 Memory. Which i hopefully will have returned for a refund soon.  I spent most of the day trying to install the software by their program , by launching from disk directly, from downloading the most current version from the manufacturer's website and checking with Microsoft for possible system change updates.
    My original invoice August 2005 lists the  pre order lists the Item VGMS-NX6600/256E   then under description MSI NX6600-TD256E/PCIEX/256MB for the grand price of $169.00  deleviery receipt lists the card as item VGXM-X66DHEJTZ1   Description XMEDIA 6600 256MB PCIE DVI/TV
    Power Supply 630 watts installed July 2008 I can not get the full listings of voltage and amps per connectors without taking the powers supply loose from the case(which requires shutting the system off, so I hoping I won't need to but will if the information will help). I do not feel power is an issue due to the size and the power supply was unneeded upgrade,  that I just wanted to replace when swapping out a motherboards damaged from a lighting hit or power surge. System was running fine for years.
    General system information
    Windows XP professional SP3 All updates current.
    Intel Pentium 4 3.2 GHz
    2.00 GB of Ram DDR 1
    Videocard  NVIDA 6600   Driver 6.14.12.9573
    3 hard drives of varying sizes 500GB,1TB and 2TB  Plus one external  with external power supply 1.5TB drive
    If more information is needed please let me know.
    The best advice and help would be a list of currently for sale video cards that will work with links to places (and the actual model even better) like New Egg,  or if there is such a card at the local Best Buy(outstanding advice on this non compatible/working card....I won't digress into my own mistake of buying there). I'm way out of date on information and standards about computers and hardware and need help  figuring out what Video Cards to look at for purchasing.   Preferably new, then re manufactured with warranty then used...  The main game I play that strains my system but is playable is call of duty modern warfare 2 and would like to run 3 if possible. Although better rates with COD MW2 and COD 4 MW.

    100% correct on the mother board
    The card I had tried was EVGA---GeForce-GT-610 2GB DDR3 I can't post external links but it was from Best Buy. The  box claimed requirements are that it needs PCI Express or PCI Express 2.0 compliant motherboards with one open graphic slot.  The best I could get out of it was slightly working with Windows XP basic driver which no games would run. No selecting drivers helped from the Add Hardware program.
    So I should make sure it lists "PCI Express X16" and  " version 1 " "1MB(in reference to what part?)" or words to that effect?  I was mislead by the box above for capability and "NVIDIA" on it, am I correct in assuming it was a generic whore knock off which bought the rights to stick NVIDIA name on the outside for a standard or software?  Especially since the actual video card says EVGA and not NVIDIA on it....  I won't make that mistake hopefully again.
    Due to age I was buying a cheap fill in card,(old one was working fine but I figured a good training/practice exercise and to see how much better the games looked  to encourage me going forward on my first build) until I can start ordering and building to  the current upgradeable standards.   I'm trying to catch up on standards and not  have a firewire or zipdrive experience. Although I might put a 5 1/4 disk drive in unused bay for show    I would prefer not to buy another per-assembled option and decent computer part stores near me are lacking. Or I lack knowledge of their locations. If it matters I'm in Charlotte, NC USA
    My budget is up to about $200 although I would like to stay around $100.00 (usa dollars) if possible. I think that gives me realistic options even with places like Best Buy. If I'm not, please correct me. I'm aware best Buy will give me a special 30-50% price increase  but my local options for shops are hurting, the "best place for reputation" is a story of shame.

  • PS CS5 claims my video cards have zero memory, no GPU access!

    Hi folks
    Firsrt post here. I hope some one can assist as I have been dealing with this issue for few days now. My hard drive died last week...had to reinstall everything. Now, for some reason Photoshop refuses to enable OpenGL access even though before I was able to use Photoshop with same video cards. I have reinstalled the app multiple times, reset prefs many times, installed various versions of my video card drivers (right now I am on the latest drive). I checked Adobe and NVidia sites and my cards are listed as supported. I checked Device driver (shows cards installed ok) and Windows sees my cards and I check Direct X diagnostics and it sees my cards memories.
    Here are my specs:
    Windows Vista 32
    2 x NVidia Geforce 8800 GTX (have a 512 memory each, not running SLI)
    4 Gigs of RAM
    2 x 500 Gig WD drives
    Wacom Cintiq as second display
    I know my OpenGL works because I am able to run Modo fine. I checked in Device Manager and all seems ok.
    Here is the top part of what Photoshop shows in Systems Information:
    Adobe Photoshop Version: 12.0 (12.0x20100407
    [20100407.r.1103 2010/04/07:14:00:00 cutoff; r
    branch]) x32
    Operating System: Windows Vista 32-bit
    Version: 6.0 Service Pack 2
    System architecture: Intel CPU Family:6, Model:7,
    Stepping:6 with MMX, SSE Integer, SSE FP, SSE2,
    SSE3, SSE4.1
    Physical processor count: 2
    Processor speed: 2793 MHz
    Built-in memory: 2046 MB
    Free memory: 652 MB
    Memory available to Photoshop: 1643 MB
    Memory used by Photoshop: 70 %
    Image tile size: 128K
    Image cache levels: 4
    Display: 2
    Display Bounds:= top: 0, left: -1600, bottom: 1200,
    right: 0
    Display: 1
    Display Bounds:= top: 0, left: 0, bottom: 1200,
    right: 1920
    Video Card Number: 1
    Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
    Driver Version: 8.17.12.7061
    Driver Date: 20110408051400.000000-000
    Video Card Driver:
    nvd3dum.dll,nvwgf2um.dll,nvwgf2um.dll
    Video Mode: 1920 x 1200 x 4294967296 colors
    Video Card Caption: NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
    Video Card Memory: 0 MB
    Video Card Number: 1
    Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
    Driver Version: 8.17.12.7061
    Driver Date: 20110408051400.000000-000
    Video Card Driver:
    nvd3dum.dll,nvwgf2um.dll,nvwgf2um.dll
    Video Mode: 1920 x 1200 x 4294967296 colors
    Video Card Caption: NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
    Video Card Memory: 0 MB
    Serial number: Tryout Version
    Application folder: C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe
    Photoshop CS5\
    Temporary file path:
    C:\Users\Arash\AppData\Local\Temp\
    Photoshop scratch has async I/O enabled
    Scratch volume(s):
    C:\, 931.5G, 825.0G free
    Primary Plug-ins folder: C:\Program
    Files\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop CS5\Plug-ins\
    Additional Plug-ins folder: not set
    Again, the only thing I notice is zero memory for my cards which seems odd.
    I greatly appreciate some help.
    Thanks

    Update the video card driver, and if that doesn't work - talk to NVIdia.
    We can only go by the values returned by the video card driver.

Maybe you are looking for