Video quality and size difference between clip preview and project view

Hey, Just want the video to look the same in project view as it does in clip preview. Video in project view is in widescreen mode and quality isn't as good. When i use the effects tool to fit the video to the screen the quality looks horrible.
Clip is 1920x1080
Thank you

http://forums.adobe.com/message/3804341#3804341

Similar Messages

  • Size difference between 60GB and 80GB?

    Is there a size difference between the 60GB and 80GB iPod with videos? I was looking at a Belkin Tunepower power source for my iPod and it said it has sleeves for 30GB and 60GB iPod videos, but I just checked the Apple store and they only sell 30 and 80 gig iPods. Will my 80GB fit the 60GB sleeve?

    Your 80 GB ought to fit the 60 GB case, since the exact dimensions of both iPods are identical:
    60 GB: 4.1 x 2.4 x 0.55 inches
    80 GB: 4.1 x 2.4 x 0.55 inches
    Of course, if you are using a 30 GB, that would be different, since the 30 GB is a little thinner than the 60 and 80 GB models of Fifth Generations.
    -Kylene

  • Best choices for optimizing video quality and playability

    I'm shooting family videos with a Panasonic TM-900 camcorder. I absolutely love the look of video shot in 1080p 60fps, but I'm not sure of the best way to process this video in FCPX for output. I prefer playing back edited videos on a HTPC connected to a NTSC HDTV, but I also distribute videos to family members on DVD. So my questions are: what are the best settings for FCPX to achieve a good balance of video quality and playability. Best frame rate for output files? Best codec? Will H.264 compression compromise video quality? My experiments so far have yielded wildly different results. Depending on the codec used and output frame rate selected, file sizes can be huge or reasonable; playability (via home theater programs like Plex and XBMC) can be superb, jerky, or non-existent. And of course, quality seems to suffer when outputting these files to DVD. Please share your thoughts and experiences on the best way to approach this challenge. 

    Working with H.264  is probably not going to give the best results if outputting to DVD. If you optimize media and let FCP determine your clips project settings, that will set the stage for several successful workflows.
    If you're OK with a basic menu, you could simply use Share DVD and let FCP do all the work. It will change the frame rate to 29.97, and the quality should be pretty decent.(If you want more control over the quality settings, Compressor can do a similar job; output a master file and bring that into Compressor.)
    If you want a more complex DVD and menu, what Al said about Master File>iDVD.
    Also as he indicated,  you could also consider using either FCP or Compressor to create AVCHD disks if your movies are under about 40 minutes in length. Your family will need Blu Ray players of some sort to be able to view them.
    You could make a true Blu Ray disk from FCP or Compressor if you have a Blu Ray burner. (There are also some third party solutions for BD.)
    Russ

  • In the shared variable properties box, when enabling aliasing, what is the difference between binding to a project variable vs. to a psp url

    In the shared variable properties box, specifically with regard to a the target being an rt target, when enabling aliasing, what is the difference between binding to a project variable vs. to a psp url?

    The difference is in the type of variable you are binding it to.  A project variable is a variable that lives within the specific project in which it was created.  A PSP URL is an address using the Publish-Subscribe Protocol (PSP).  You can learn more about PSP URLs here: http://zone.ni.com/reference/en-XX/help/371361G-01/lvconcepts/using_datasocket_technology/#Specifyin...
    PSP URLs will enable it to communicate between different machines and also between projects which may or may not be open.  The project variable will exist within the project.
    Julian R.
    Applications Engineer
    National Instruments

  • What are the differences between the following Oracle database views?

    What are the differences between the following Oracle database views(or function)? Can they be instead of each other? Can all of them be used to pull out the execution plan from the library cache?
    V$SQL_PLAN
    DBA_HIST_SQL_PLAN
    dbms_xplan.display_cursor function

    junez wrote:
    What are the differences between the following Oracle database views(or function)? Can they be instead of each other? Can all of them be used to pull out the execution plan from the library cache?
    V$SQL_PLAN
    DBA_HIST_SQL_PLAN
    dbms_xplan.display_cursor functionV$SQL_PLAN-this is dynamic perfomance view which contain execution plan information for each child cursor loaded in the library cache.
    DBA_HIST_SQL_PLAN- data dictionary view also contain execution plan information for each child cursor bun in workload repository.Actually this view captures information from V$SQL_PLAN and is used with the DBA_HIST_SQLSTAT .
    dbms_xplan.display_cursor - function displays explain plan of any cursor loaded in the cursor cache. See more information below links:
    http://youngcow.net/doc/oracle10g/server.102/b14237/dynviews_2120.htm
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B14117_01/server.101/b10755/statviews_2154.htm
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B12037_01/appdev.101/b10802/d_xplan.htm#998179

  • Difference between SAP Reference IMG & Project IMG...

    Hi SAP Gurus,
              Can anyone explain me about the difference between
              SAP Reference IMG & Project IMG...
    Thanks in advance,
    Praveen.

    Hi !
    The SAP Reference IMG contains alle the customizing functionallity of SAP.
    Within a Project IMG you can restrict the availible customizing function.
    Thinking about having an MM project. When you create an "MM" Project IMG you will only "see" MM relevant customizing functions in your project IMG.
    Regards
    Rainer
    Some points would be nice if that helped.

  • What r the trns code for maintenance view, help view and projection view

    hi all
    what r the transaction code for maintenance view, help view and projection view
    can anyone tell me how to create maitenance, help and projection view.
    with an example
    regs
    hari

    <b>What is the Different Types and Usage of Views
    The followings are different types of views:</b>
    - <b>Database View   (SE11)</b>
    Database views are implement an inner join, that is, only records of the primary table (selected via the join operation) for which the corresponding records of the secondary tables also exist are fetched. Inconsistencies between primary and secondary table could, therefore, lead to a reduced selection set. 
    In database views, the join conditions can be formulated using equality relationships between any base fields. In the other types of view, they must be taken from existing foreign keys. That is, tables can only be collected in a maintenance or help view if they are linked to one another via foreign keys.
    - <b>Help View    ( SE54)</b>
    Help views are used to output additional information when the online help system is called. 
    When the F4 button is pressed for a screen field, a check is first made on whether a matchcode is defined for this field. If this is not the case, the help view is displayed in which the check table of the field is the primary table. Thus, for each table no more than one help view can be created, that is, a table can only be primary table in at most one help view. 
    -<b> Projection View  (SE11)</b>
    Projection views are used to suppress or mask certain fields in a table (projection), thus minimizing the number of interfaces. This means that only the data that is actually required is exchanged when the database is accessed.
    A projection view can draw upon only one table. Selection conditions cannot be specified for projection views.
    <b>- Maintenance View   ( SE54 )</b>
    Maintenance views enable a business-oriented approach to looking at data, while at the same time, making it possible to maintain the data involved. Data from several tables can be summarized in a maintenance view and maintained collectively via this view. That is, the data is entered via the view and then distributed to the underlying tables by the system.
    reward   points if it is usefull...
    Girish

  • File size difference between DNG Converter and Lightroom Beta 4

    Hi,
    I want to go the all-DNG route and am trying several things ATM. I want my files to be as small as possible, thus I disable previews and RAW embedding and enable compression in DNG Converter. In Lightroom, there are no options at all. What I do get, are pretty amazing file size differences:
    Original .NEF as it came from my D70s: ~5MB
    .DNG created by DNG Converter: ~1MB
    .DNG created by Lightroom: ~4MB
    The very small file size in DNG Converter is the one that bother's me most. I get these small files from time to time. I checked both the DNG and the NEF in Photoshop, and they seem to be identical. So my question is: What triggers these small file sizes? Do I loose anything? Or is the Lightroom DNG converter not as advanced as the stand alone version?
    Maybe this helps: I get the ridicolous small files for very dull subjects that tell the computer scientist in me that it should be easily compressable by common compression algorithms.
    Thanks for any pointers,
    Markus

    Thanks for the hint! It did make me revisit those files and now I see the reason for the small file sizes: The Apple Finder does note update the file size view once a file was added to a folder. Here's what I did:
    Opened a folder full of .NEFs in detail view in Finder.
    Converted them using DNG Converter
    Looked at the sizes of the files as they were shown in the Finder window allready open.
    Unfortunately, those file sizes are not correct. If I open a new Finder window of the same folder, file sizes are correctly reported as between 3.5 and 5 MB.

  • Size differences between editable and non-ediatble combo boxes

    Hi
    There seem to be some differences between the sizes of editable and non-editable JComboBox.
    I have two combos one editable and one non-editable.Even though all the constraints(except [x, y], of course) are same for both in gridbaglayout, they are displayed in different sizes.
    Why is it so? and what should I do to display them in same size. I dont want to do trial and error.
    Another related question is, how do I set two editable comboboxes to always have same sizes irrespective of the values are added into it. I am asking this question bcos I have observed that sizes differ between combos when values are added during initialization and when values are added at a later time.
    TIA,
    CA

    Maybe something like this:
    myCombo.addItemListener( new ItemListener() {
    public void itemStateChanged( ItemEvent ie )
        JComboBox combo = (JComboBox)ie.getSource();
        ComboValue selection = (ComboValue)combo.getSelectedItem();
        if( combo.getSelectedItem().equals("edit") )
            combo.setEditable( true );
        else
            combo.setEditable( false );
    }}):(untested code)

  • Font Size Difference between Exe and Labview IDE

    I'm stumped on the following issue and surprizinglycan't find any references that are similar on this forum.
    I've developed an application which, when built to an Exe, has different font sizes than when executed on the same computer in the Labview Integrated Development Environment.  In each instance the screen resolution is the same.  I've used the "Application Font".  I'm having trouble figuring why the font would render differently in each case.  Of possible signifigance is that I'm running the Exe by simply browsing to the folder where the build procedure drops it instead of building an installation.
    I've attached one of the most glaring examples that shows the rendering in each case.
    I'm hoping that someone can point me in the right direction to resolve this issue.
    Attachments:
    Font Differences1.zip ‏1704 KB

    Hi Doctor,
    two notes:
    for the font size differences: I would try to change the font settings
    to a more 'specific' font like Arial 14pt. The application font is set
    somewhere in an ini-file and the setting may change with the
    environment (IDE vs. exe-rt).
    for your attachment: please convert pictures to jpg or png. This will
    reduce size by orders of magnitude :-) And please crop them, unless you
    have a very (VERY) beautiful desktop background picture!
    Best regards,
    GerdW
    CLAD, using 2009SP1 + LV2011SP1 + LV2014SP1 on WinXP+Win7+cRIO
    Kudos are welcome

  • MacMini - LG 32" (32LB75) Problem - Poor video quality and now no picture.

    Hi there, apologies for the length of this post....
    I purchased a mac mini 1.8Ghz with 2Gb RAM yesterday with a wireless keyboard and mouse and hooked it up to my 32" LG 32LB75 using VGA. On startup the display looked ok, I managed to click through the various Leopard initialisations. I bought the machine for use as a front room media player for mainly DivX movies and the occasional bit of music.
    Once I had installed the DivX codec I opened a DivX file in Quicktime and selected "full screen mode." As soon as the movie started I became quite disappointed. The picture quality was quite pixelated ("noisy") and certainly not as good as when I play the same movie file from my old dell PC on the same LG tv (the dell PC has a 64Mb PCI radeon 7000 which connects to the tv using the same VGA port as the mac).
    Anyway just to give the mac a fair go I thought I would try out some genuine quicktime video samples from the itunes store (this time viewed from front row)....again not brilliant.
    So I thought I would investigate the screen resolution to see if I could improve things. It appeared the resolution was set to 1900 by 1200ish I say "ish" because I can't remember exactly. I then attempted to reduce the resolution and eventually I settled on one that looked quite clear with the font size big enough to be easily read. Again I tried the movie and there wasn't much (if any improvement). Whilst changing resolutions the screen would go blank for a few seconds but on one particular setting (can't remember exact numbers) the display went blank and never came back. The tv now just displays "no signal".
    I despaired and connected the mac to a 17" Iiyama montior that I use with a PC and it worked ok. However each time I tried to "hot swap" back to the television I would end up with no picture.
    I'm really disappointed because everything else about the mac I really like. Particularly the remote for frontrow which is precisely what I wanted it for. The problem is I've spent over £500 and now seem to have a lesser quality picture than I had to begin with (ignoring for the moment that I don't have any picture!!)
    Anyway my questions are these, answers to any or all most appreciated.
    1) what is the easiest way to get my mini to start displaying on my tv again?
    2) what would the optimum resolution be? My television mentions 1366 x 768 in the manual
    3) If the mini doesn't offer this resolution in the pick list is it advisable to "force it" using some alternative software (ie 3dexpress.de)?
    4) Is the video quality affected by the software player? ie would VLC give better picture with DivX over quicktime/itunes/front row?
    5) How likely is it that the video resolution of my new mac mini isn't "as good" as my old dell machine with its PCI graphics card?
    6) Finally if I don't get results as good as my existing PC setup, how accomodating are apple with refunds? I bought it from a UK high-street apple store. The back of the receipt mentions a "14 day not satisfied" return policy but then goes on to say something about being "unopened"...which seems a little confusing. Ie how do you know if you're satisfied until you've actually used it?

    Hi there
    the solution was to remove the various display config files in leopard and then restart the machine, this got my display back on the tv (albeit off centre). To fix the "off centre issue" I used the LG "auto correct" feature from the remote control "menu > screen" options.
    The apple support site describes how to remove the affected leopard display files here http://support.apple.com/kb/TS2213?viewlocale=en_US As you will see their resolution consists of 2 main steps, the first one involves starting your machine in safe mode, if this doesn't work then you proceed to the second step where you remove the files using a terminal prompt.
    I didn't bother with the first step mainly because I don't think I can start my mac in safe mode since my only keyboard is wireless (bluetooth). So I connected the mac mini to a 17" LCD monitor (which thankfully did display the video signal ok) and removed all the listed files using terminal. I then shut the mac down, swapped the VGA cable back to the LCD tv restarted the mac and it detected the tv and set a resolution that worked. I then very carefully reduced the resolution down to one that was recommended by my tv (1300ish.. x 768ish??).
    At this point I was back to having an acceptable signal but still a little off centre. So I used the TV remote, pressed menu, went into screen options and chose "auto correct". Picture then filled the screen perfectly.
    The problem seems to be, leopard lists a bunch of resolutions that it believes your tv/display can handle but it would appear that in fact some of these resolutions are not supported by your TV and if you choose one of these your signal disappears and you can't get it back.
    I would still say that I'm not 100% convinced with the mac mini's onboard graphics (I have a 1.8GHz version). I'm going to download some HD content and see if that improves things, but certainly my existing DivX collection looked a little sharper and clearer and better coloured using my old dell PC with its radeon PCI card. But the difference in picture quality is outweighed by the convenience of its size and the font row interface. I might tinker with putting Windows Media Center on it one day, perhaps that might improve things.

  • FCP Novice needs help with video quality and FCP 5!!

    Hi,
    I have a real problme that I cannot seem to fix. I think its because I am doing something really wrong!
    I have a Sony HC42E MiniDV Camcorder which by default records video in full widescreen. I recorded several tapes this way and have now begun trying to edit them in FCP 5.04 (Tiger 10.4.6). Whenever I log and capture my clips they appear to be fuzzzy and unclear on the Mac monitor whilst being totally crisp and sharp on the camcorder viewfinder. I tried capturing using the DV PAL 48Khz Anamorphic Preset which keeps everything the right size (the final output needs to be true widescreen and not with black bars added) but the resulting video on screen is blurry and bitty. I then tried capturing using the DV PAL 720 x 576 normal preset and the video is a little clearer on the screen (for both presets I have chosen lower field dominance) but when I play back it plays back in widescreen on the mac canvas window but at 4:3 on the camera's viewfinder.
    I then assumed that maybe this is just becuase the mac screen (CRT by the way) doesn't use fields. So I exported the sequence as a QT movie using DV PAL 16:9 and used quicktime (OS9 Classic - my compressor has never worked because of the dreaded "unable to connect to baackground process" problem which I've never managed to correct) to convert it to MPEG2. When I import this as an asset into DVD Studio pro 4 and set the track size to 16:9 it comes through at the right aspect ratio. However it looks blurry on screen. Thinking that this will be fine on a TV I burned the disc - inserted it into my DVD player (a good one!) and watched it on my new 32" widescreen TV (a good one!) and the picture qualitty is poor. Its so much blurrier and bittier than the original footage looks when played through the camcorder's viewfinder!
    The final footaage looks like an old VHS recording that's a year or two old!
    Does anyone know how I can capture my footage in FCP with the maximum quality, edit it without quality loss and the export it for DVD again without such significant quality loss whilst all the time keeping it at proper 16:9 widescreen?
    Is there some presets I should be working to?
    I'm tearing my hair out! Help!

    Hi Guys,
    thanx for your replies.
    here's the latest:
    Brian, I followed your instructions and the DVD burned successfully. However the video quality of the dvd when viewed on my TV ('ve tried on all 3 of my tvs now) is still a lot poorer than the quicktime movie that was imported into DVDSP4. When I play the original QT Movie on my Mac CRT monitor it looks a little blurry and grainy because I guess its non interlaced however when viewed on an external Video monitor it looks great - very sharp.
    When I view the burned DVD on my television the picture quality looks like the non interlaced version of the original QT Movie that appeared on my Mac CRT and not the sharp interlaced (lower field) version that appeared on my external video monitor.
    Its almost like taking a sharp jpeg into Photoshop and applying a gaussian blur of about 0.3 followed by jepg compression compressing it down to 5% quality!
    I'm totally mystified. Can the conversion to Mpeg2 be removing all interlacing so that you get the less sharp computer monitor look? I just want the video on my final DVDs to be as good as the original source footage! I appreciate that along the way there might be loss of some quality but surely not that much?
    Does this make sense to you guys or am I still doing something very wrong?
    Robert: I have tried setting all manner of drives including a fresh external firewire HD with nothing on it (clean out of the box) but it doesn't seem to help.
    Brian: I tried the no network suggestion a few months back but I'm not sure if I got it right. At the moment I have broadband through an external speedtouch usb modem and am also connected (occasionally although not for the last 3 months) via a crossover cable to my PCs ethernet card. When I last tried the No Network solution I had immense trouble getting my internet to work again! Can you please help me by directing me to the best ay to do this while protecting my internet settings?
    any more help guys would be greatfully appreciated.

  • MP4 Video has 'Spinning Wheel' in between clips in Captivate 8

    We've recorded several video demo clips within a Captivate 8 project.  They should flow seamlessly in our published video, but when we publish to video (MP4) Captivate adds 'spinning progress wheels' in between every clip.  It doesn't show these wheels in the preview or HTML5 version.  We need the MP4 version without these progress wheels.  What can we do?  Is this a bug?  Please help!!

    Unfortunately, that isn't it.  I'm running the MP4 video from local solid state disk and the spinning wheels only show up in between clips recorded in captivate...

  • Video quality and dimension always smaller than i make it

    every time that i set the quality and dimensions in the media encoder it look great. i make sure the preview is set to output but when it finishes no matter what the video is always very smal compared to what i put in. when i put the file in after fx it is also less quality then what it was in adobe premiere. any help would be awesome!!!

    You have Zoom on... double tap with three fingers to turn it off.   Go into Settings > General > Accessibility to disable it.
    See p. 243... http://manuals.info.apple.com/en_US/iPhone_iOS4_User_Guide.pdf

  • Airplay Video quality and buffering

    I'm new to apple TV and am trying to watch my home movies (holidays etc) over airpay. However, I've found that if I try to watch in Full HD there's a considerable amount of buffering (2-3 mins) before the movie will start to play, and if I skip if buffers again. Basically is seems any file over 1.2GB struggles. I can convert the video using a lower bitrate etc which reduces the file size, but then obviously you lose quality.
    Is there a way of playing Full HD video of large file sizes without buffering, or a way of compressing the video files without losing picture quality? I've tried MP4 and .MOV but the file sizes are very large.
    TIA

    Thanks for the help, but this did not solve my problem. I have found a workaround though which is satisfactory.
    What I've found that ideally the bitrate needs to be around 15, 20 and above it struggles regardless of file size. I tried converting with wondershare with a lower bitrate (eg original bitrate 23, converted 15) but the quality was noticeably worse. I tried passthrough using quicktime pro 7, but as you'd expect the bitrate didn't alter.
    What I found by trial and error was to open the original .mov file using quicktime player 10 (10.2), go to file > Export and in the format dropdown select 1080p. The exported movie has a lower bitrate with no/VERY VERY little loss in video quality. These then play over airplay with no lag/buffering

Maybe you are looking for