Virsa CC 5.1: Showing incorrect violations with respect to a Role

Hi All,
Following is the Scenario:
I have a role in R/3 AA_BB_CCC  which has the following TCODES:
                AS01
                AS02
In Virsa CC 5.1, there is one Risk called S007 which has the following associated functions:
             AR05   and    SD05
In AR05, following are th tcodes:
   V.07
   VF01
   VF11
and others
In SD05 following are the tcodes:
KE2C
V-01
VA01
VA02
and others
When Role Analysis is done, Virsa CC shows that role AA_BB_CCC is throwing violation as follows:
Conflicting Tcodes:       VA01 and VF11
                                   VA02 and VF11
However, if you could see in the above role AA_BB_CCC in R/3, only VA01 and VA02 are defiened! there is no Tcode VF11 in role AA_BB_CCC. I have done the following work arounds so far:
1.Once again  did role synchronization in full mode
2.Did Role Analysis with management report.
However, this still shows the same false result which is not correct. what could be the problem?
Kindly let me know if you want to  have any other information.
Thanks and Regards,
Faisal

Hi Prem,
Thanks alot for your suggestions. I must say that I have mentioned the role name correctly. Also,
3) check carefully the way you are running the risk analyis for role?
I think we have only 2 options there: Action and Permission Level.
4) check if you are picking the right system ( these are the silly mistakes we all tend to do )
I am working on VCC 5.1, so there is no option to select the system. Ofcourse, I can select a particular user/role/profile out there.
Your involvement would be appreciated!
Has anybody worked on functional part of CC also?
Thanks and Regards,
Faisal

Similar Messages

  • Wi-fi shows incorrect password with new ios7 upgrade

    after installing ios7 my wi-fi password now is incorrect.  My IPAD connects just fine.

    From what you describe it appears that the router has fixed itself rather than the iPod. Remember, routers are computers too. It is the router that was rejecting the password. Restarting it apparently cleared whatever problem it was having.
    Glad it's working again.

  • Creative Zen (16GB Model) showing incorrect song information

    <Creative Zen (6GB Model) showing incorrect song information I was given a Creative Zen for christmas, and I'm very happy with it.
    The only thing is, I've noticed that it seems to occasionally display the wrong title for the song it's playing. I have a playlist called RandomAll which I created using the Media Explorer software. Sometimes, when I look down at the player, I'll notice the wrong song information on screen. Not just the title or anything, but completely wrong information. For example, right now, my player is telling my that a Rihanna song is playing, and gives me all the details for that song (including the extended details if I go into the menu). But the song that's actually playing is a cover of Fraggle Rock by Me First & The Gimme Gimmes. It doesn't seem to be the same songs every time or anything like that, so I don't think it's a problem with the files.
    Is this an issue that has been noticed by anyone else? Is there anything I can do to fix it's And if not, is it the kind of thing I need to send my player back for?

    @ It could be incorrect ID3 tags on your .mp3s, if the source for your music had the wrong ID3 information, your Zen won't show the correct information unless you use an? ID3 Tag Editor to correct the source.

  • Crystal report showing Incorrect data against Bex Query

    I have created Crystal report on top of Bex Query, I have not done any calculations in the report, just dragging structure and key figure in the report, ran for one month, when I compare with Bex Query with same period, it is showing incorrect data.
    I don't know what can be wrong here?
    We are Business Objects 3.1 SP3.
    Thanks,
    Ravi

    HI,
    I would suggest you trace the workflow in Web INtelligence according to these notes:
    Tracing:
    Unix : Note 1235111
    Windows : Note 1260004
    and then post a link for downloading the trace files here.
    regards
    Ingo

  • T42 Showing Incorrect Adapter Name in Access Connections

    I am working on a T42 laptop and installed Access Connections 5.12.  I have gone through and did all the prerequisites prior to installation of Access Connections (wireless driver update, UltraNav Driver upgrade, Video Upgrade, BIOS upgrade, LAN driver update, etc).  I have created a profile for a wireless network that is in range and operational.  My problem is the adapter is showing incorrectly within Access Connections.  This wireless adapter is identified correctly in device manager as "11b/g Wireless LAN Mini PCI Adapter".  But in Access Connections, it is showing as "Intel(R) WiFi Link 5300 AGN".  I am needing this to identify the correct adapter to get Access Connections to work.  Any ideas?

    Hi jeremieolson,
    Unless you need to use Access Connections to switch among multiple *wired* networks, I'd suggest simply un-installing Access Connections and using the built-in Windows tools for establishing your wireless connection. Windows will let you establish wireless profiles just like Access Connections does. AFAIK Access Connections doesn't add anything to the built-in Windows wireless networking, and in your case it's misbehaving, so...
    Results of Your Ideal Business-Class Laptop survey, concluded 2009-07-29.
    Did someone help you?
    Say thanks! with a kudo.
    Even better: Pay it forward, help someone else.

  • GRC 10.1 SP06 - ARA shows no violations at permission Level

    Hi Guys,
    We've just installed SP06 and we came across the issue described in the title of the discussion.
    Rules have been generated and we're using the standard "global" ruleset. The rules seem to be generated successfully ( I've checked in the NWBC that the permissions appear after the risk generation and also I've checked some tables like GRACSYSRULE and GRACACTRULE and risks appear there).
    Risk analysis seem to work fine at action level but we don't have violations at permission level even when we now that user should have violations (for example a user with SAP_ALL). for some cases some risks seem to appear at permission level but only with the object S_TCODE.
    Just to discard problems with the connector we've created a Legacy connector, upload the files and ran the synch. The analysis at permission level still show "no violations". We tested with THE SAME files and ruleset in a system with SP05 and it worked as expected showing violations at permission level.
    Does anyone faced a similar issue? can you give me some light in order to solve the issue?
    Many Thanks!
    Diego.

    Hi!
    We still don't have a SAP official response but we think that the error is because of the note:
    2014811 - Risk Analysis Dump in case of huge data
    That we've implemented some days ago as part of the advance corrections of SP07.
    The error seems to be related to the following class:
    But there are many changes related to such note...So we're not sure about the exact details.
    We DE-implemented the note mentioned above and after that the analysis at permission level worked as expected.
    Hope to have a SAP response soon, but meanwhile I do not recommend to implement such note.
    Thanks!
    Diego.

  • Report Viewer shows incorrect data when viewing pages from last to first

    Post Author: Fmorales
    CA Forum: .NET
    Hello.
    I've made a huge report with Crystal Reports for Visual Studio 2005, and sometimes the Report Viewer show data with errors.
    If I see all pages of my report in order, 1 first, then 2nd, 3, 4... until the last one.... The report is always correct.
    If I see all pages in reverse order, 1 first (shown by default), then last one, then last one-1.... until 2nd.. All years show incorrect, except first one... 
    In an outer section, for every year, there is a final row which shows summarize calculated data. The error consists in that every value of the row is 0.
    It seems that Crystal Report calculates while showing, that's good.. but... Why does it ignore the data before when I see directly the last page?? It forces me to see all pages one by one in ascendant order to ensure data is correct.. I must fix that error.
    The way I calculate data in the problematic summarize row is a bit complicated, but I'll try... Let's focus in one only column (the other ones are similar). The summarize value is a formula which simply show a global value :
    WhilePrintingRecords;
    CurrencyVar margenActual;
    which is being increasing or decreasing along the group:
    WhilePrintingRecords;
    CurrencyVar actual:=actual+CurrentFieldValue; 
    if {PresupPeriodifMesesAux_DS.TIPO} = 'PAGOS' then         CurrencyVar margenActual:=margenActual-CurrentFieldValueelse    CurrencyVar margenActual:=margenActual+CurrentFieldValue;
    DefaultAttribute
    It is placed in the backgrond property of a CrossTab cell in a hidden pre-section... Well.. I know it's a bit complicated, but I have to do that way because it was the only trick I found to make a summarize file before printing data summarized (that's why the line "CurrencyVar actual:=actual+CurrentFieldValue;" appeared in formula). So I also wanted to use this formula to acummulate "margenActual".
    In the inner section I reset the actual value (this value always go fine):
    WhilePrintingRecords;
    CurrencyVar actual:=0; 
    Before end of year I reset the margenActual value:
    WhilePrintingRecords;
    CurrencyVar margenActual:=0; 
    I've tried multiple combinations (using WhileReadingRecords instead WhilePrintingRecords) but data is incorrect or I cannot get rid of visualization page's problem....
    Any idea?
    Thanks a lot

    quote:
    Originally posted by:
    ntsiii
    If you were previously using <mxXML> you WERE using
    e4x.
    So remove that tag, create an instance variable of the same
    name, typed as xml, and in your result handler, do as VarioPegged
    suggests, though I would cast/convert to xml first:
    companies = XML(event.result);
    trace(companies.toXMLString()); to look at your xml
    var xlCompanies:XMLList = xmlCompanies..company; //all such
    expressions return XMLList, never XML
    trace(xmlCompanies.length()); //
    Tracy
    Ok so the ID of the mxXML was being interpreted as an E4X
    variable at compile time?
    I tried changing the name of the ID of the HTTPService call
    from "marketData" to "MDATA" and assigning the variable marketData
    to the result of the HTTPService query, which if I understand you
    correctly should basically make everything work as it was before,
    but it seems to be a problem.
    when I try to run it puts an exclamation point on this line
    <toolbox:TreeMap id="treeMap" width="1200" height="800"
    dataProvider="{marketData}"
    labelField="@cname" weightField="@amount"
    colorFunction="{itemToColor}"
    toolTipFunction="{itemToToolTip}"/>
    That code refers to a SWC file. Apparently it wants
    marketData to be a data provider. If I change the dataProvider
    reference above to "MDATA" (the ID of the HTTPService) the App
    compiles, but I get two errors at runtime:
    TypeError: Error #1009: Cannot access a property or method of
    a null object reference.
    ReferenceError: Error #1081: Property @age1 not found on
    mx.rpc.http.mxml.HTTPService and there is no default value.
    What should I change this reference to? It won't compile if I
    use the variable I made for the e4x results and it is reading
    gibberish if I have it read directly from the
    HTTPService....?

  • ITunes 6.0.2 shows incorrect track lengths, clips track when playing

    I just upgraded to iTunes 6.0.2. In previous versions, iTunes would often show incorrect track lengths on longer tracks, but would play them all the way through, with the time remaining staying at 0:00 until the track finished playing. This new version simply cuts the track off at the incorrect endtime. For example, I have a track with a length of 17:33, but iTunes has always shown it as 17:28. No big deal, it would always play to the end. Now, the new version cuts it off abruptly at 17:28. There seems to be no way to correct the track length. Is there any way to fix the track lengths to their correct times, or get them to at least play all the way through?? These are custom mixes and not from commercial CDs, so simply re-ripping isn't an option.
    Snow iMac G3 500 MHz   Mac OS X (10.4.4)   384 MB RAM

    I have recently accused Emusic.com of supplying truncated tracks only to find that Itunes 6.02 and 6.03 (Mac) is clipping the start and end of the tracks. The counter gives the correct length but the playing is not correct. Fade out / in are off. Playing the offending tracks in quicktime or any other player gives all the track music.
    Looking deeper shows that the tracks in question are all VBR .mp3 tracks (Variable Bit Rate).
    Solutions to date are to either play in another player (not ideal).
    Convert the tracks to fixed bit rate .mp3 using the setting nearest to the highest variable bit rate. Amazingly this works even when the conversion is done in Itunes. Your file size should be same or larger to avoid quality loss.
    On playing the tracks I have converted the counter in Itunes gives the same reading but the tacks are not truncated.
    Some VBR tracks do not seem to have the problem but that is usually because the nature of the track makes it less obvious.
    G4 power mac   Mac OS X (10.4.5)  
    G4 power mac   Mac OS X (10.4.5)  

  • OO4O & VC++ Access Violation with large sql statement  - REPOST

    This is a repost - my email address was incorrect on the previous message
    OO4O & VC++ Access Violation with large sql statement
    Using Oracle C++ Class Library OO4O for Oracle9i Version 9.0.1.4.3 for
    Windows 98/NT/2000/XP.
    Open a dynaset with a large sql statemant more then 1000 chars you get
    a Access Violation, like below.
    szSQL = "select..."
    ores = oDyn.Open( odb, szSQL, ODYNASET_READONLY || ODYNASET_NOCACHE);
    The same sql query works without any problem in SQL Plus. A simple SQL statement works fine using OO4O.
    Any ideas?
    [email protected]

    I am using Jboss 2.44 with tomcat3.2.3, and I get deployment problems when using jdk1.5, I also tried JBoss 4 but I also have lots of problems with that.
    I have this huge system developed long time ago. I have problems with printing in jdk1.3 so upgrade to 1.4 or higher will fix the printing. Upgrading to jdk1.5 and JBoss 4 will need lots of rewrite which is not an option.
    So to me it seems easier if I keep using jboss2.44 and tomcat 3.2.3 but just upgrade to JDK 1.4. All off this is just because jdk1.3.1 has printing bugs.
    Bushwack, I am ding exactly like you are, the only difference is, ResultSet.CONCUR_UPDATABLE and I used , ResultSet.CONCUR_READONLY. But I tried and still the same error.
    I will try using a new JDBC driver, hope it works, I am just struggling to find a free one

  • Logviewer 1.14 showing incorrect times, and other issues.

    Couple of issues with running LogViewer, wondering if anyone can help.
    First, and seems to be the most frustrating, is that the LogViewer screen is showing incorrect times for the events. I am in Mountain Time zone in the US, which is GMT-7. When looking at the log from a web browser, my router is displaying the correct time. The text file that LogViewer saves on the local computer shows the same correct time. The LogViewer screen, however, shows a time 7 hours into the future. IE, if I type out the log from a DOS window, the last event will say something like "Mar 28 1:15:05 2008", but that same event number will be listed on the logviewer screen as "Mar 28 8:15:05" Any ideas on what may be wrong and how to correct it?
    Second, all events seem to be grouped exactly 3 minutes apart. I realize this is probably an effect of the router sending the information every three minutes. Anyone know of a way of changing that period?
    Hm, just noticed a third, but very minor issue. The text file written has the wrong day of week on it. It's listing Mar 28 2008 as a Wednesday...
    Thanks in advance for any advice.
    OK, the tech info. I am running LogViewer 1.14 on a Windows XP machine, contacting an WRT55AG with firmware 1.20. The connection is through a Cat 5 cable, not through the wireless.

    Couple of issues with running LogViewer, wondering if anyone can help.
    First, and seems to be the most frustrating, is that the LogViewer screen is showing incorrect times for the events. I am in Mountain Time zone in the US, which is GMT-7. When looking at the log from a web browser, my router is displaying the correct time. The text file that LogViewer saves on the local computer shows the same correct time. The LogViewer screen, however, shows a time 7 hours into the future. IE, if I type out the log from a DOS window, the last event will say something like "Mar 28 1:15:05 2008", but that same event number will be listed on the logviewer screen as "Mar 28 8:15:05" Any ideas on what may be wrong and how to correct it?
    Second, all events seem to be grouped exactly 3 minutes apart. I realize this is probably an effect of the router sending the information every three minutes. Anyone know of a way of changing that period?
    Hm, just noticed a third, but very minor issue. The text file written has the wrong day of week on it. It's listing Mar 28 2008 as a Wednesday...
    Thanks in advance for any advice.
    OK, the tech info. I am running LogViewer 1.14 on a Windows XP machine, contacting an WRT55AG with firmware 1.20. The connection is through a Cat 5 cable, not through the wireless.

  • My Dock doesn't show all applications with shortcut

    My Dock doesn't show all applications with shortcut
    Apple tab only shows some applications on my list not all, anyone know why? I went under system settings to fix it and there is no option for it.
    Thanks!

    Perhaps I don't understand your question, but if you think that the doc shows every application you have on the computer, this is incorrect. If you want certain applications to be shown on the dock you have to add them to the dock. The dock comes preset with a few select Applications Apple wants to feature but you are free to add others or remove ones you don't use.
    Patrick

  • Search results showing incorrect modified date

    Hi All,
    I have a one difficulty in search results.
    Document showing incorrect modified date in search results. And this happens for one document only.
    We have customized the search/results.aspx page, Our document is showing correct modified date in document properties,All Items.aspx like 31/4/2013.
    But when i search with document name in search, result showing incorrect modified date like 24/6/2004.
    I checked with database in SQL, every thing is fine.
    I have updated the Modified date through powershell script for one document and after that this recent modified date is showing in search results.
    But after updating the Modified date through powershell, issued document not showing the recent modified date in search results. still showing as 24/6/2004.
    I should not do edit property and save, to create new version.
    I don't know what is happening in search crawl. All ready full crawl running daily basis.
    I want to check whether this issued document is crawling or not. Could anybody help me to get out of this. what is the main cause of this issue.
    Thanks & Regards
    MD.Liakath ali

    Hi,
    I'm seeing the same issue after upgrading the SharePoint 2010 to SharePoint 2013.
    When I search any upgraded document in SharePoint 2013, the document's "Last Modified Date" was showing an incorrect value in Search Results page but other metadata of document like "Last Modified User" is showing the correct
    value so the problem is not with document crawl, something wrong with Last Modified Date property in Search results.
    I have seen below comment as answer but I didn't understand the solution to fix this issue for all upgraded documents.
    The most likely cause is that there is metadata on the documents that is set to that date which is overriding the other dates in the search result. SharePoint isn't particulary imaginative so it's got to be finding that date from somewhere.
    Do we have any solution for this issue? Is this issue will be addressed in SharePoint 2013 SP1?
    Note: No issues with documents, which uploaded after upgrade.

  • Power Map Locations for Canadian Postal Codes showing incorrectly

    I see great potential in the possibilities of using Power Map. However the location for one Canadian postal code is showing incorrectly on the resulting map. I have verified that the postal code itself is correct and my data has been entered correctly and
    it is below:
    N6K 0B3
    It is showing nowhere near where it is supposed to be. Users of the application have to have confidence that the mapping behind it is correct. I need to create maps for each poll for volunteers to retrieve
    the signs post-election and don't want to send them to the wrong locations.
    By the way, why is my font size changing if I modify the text in my post?
    Thanks,
    Lila

    Ahh Geolocations are fun, aren't they!
    Bing maps is showing N6K 0B3 as just south west of London, ON. Google maps shows it north of there, West of London. If Bing is not correct, you'd need to request a fix from Bing/Microsoft.
    While you wait for that, you'd have to create your own kludge to correct it:
    CASE WHEN postcode = 'N6K 0B3' THEN geography::Point(-81.437296,43.0041629,4326) ELSE bingsGeospatial as geoPoint
    I was in talks with Canada Post regarding acquiring their geo location data for post codes a while ago. You can get a product from them for about 7500 a year. I was rather disappointed to find they only provided points, and not bounding boxes (as google
    maps does).

  • Query key figures showing incorrect values

    Hi,
    key figures in my query are showing incorrect values NO CALC POSSIBLE
    Data in the cube is coming from different datasources and the cube is compressed.
    this is how data in the cube looks like
    plant    Unit   currency    Stock Quantity    Stock Value   total ( *** key figure ( inflow and outflow)
    P001    ST                         1000                   0 
    P001             EUR                                    100
    Query result
    plant       stock(PC)            Stock Quantity   Stock Value       total ( cumy figure ( inflow and outflow)
    P001       No Cal possible    1000                  100                   No Cal possible
    How do I resolve in query or cube level so that the NO CALC possible is not displayed.
    thanks

    Hi,
    Indeed my cube is a copy of 0IC_C03.
    Could you please explain more about the filtering.
    I have the following key figures
    0TOTALSTCK
    0ISSTOTSTCK
    0RECTOTSTCK
    ZISSSTCK_VALUE
    ZREC_VALUE
    ZTOTSTKVALUE
    ZTOTSTKVALUE is CKF with inflow and outflow of ZISSSTCK_VALUE
    ZREC_VALUE
    Whenever there is 0 it displays NO CALC possible. I would like to have it blank or 0s.
    thanks

  • Report to correct FD33 report is showing incorrect values ??

    Hi Guys,
    Will appreciate your help on below issue.
    The "RVKRED88 - Reorganization of SD credit data after updating errors" report is showing incorrect values.
    It is specially observed for invoice correction requests that are credit blocked.
    The doc flow is like  Order (say value  1000 $), delivery, shipment, Picking, GI, billing, accounting all cleared/complete.
    The invoice corrrection req (say value  -ve 50$)  was then created with reference to the billing doc.
    The RVKRED88 report shws the original order as open and also shows an open delivery value of 1000$ + 50$= 1050$.
    Is this behaviour correct? If not what might be the cause of this? and how to correct it?
    Regards,
    Naminator
    Edited by: Naminator on Jul 7, 2009 6:22 PM

    I am not sure, how come you are getting correct numbers for UK plant if BX is not loaded. You can get numbers correctly only in one situation which is your initial stock at that plant was ZERO, which is practically not possible.
    You said you are loading for Denmark only.
    Was the BF init done only for UK?
    How come you are loading BF Delta for UK only?
    Did you check properly that BX is not loaded into production by changing the date range. Make sure you put the lowest date range in the from field. I would put 01/01/1000
    As you said ISS is coming right because those are movements and they dont have to do anything with initial stock, but initial stock and movements affec your Total Stock Key Figure.
    - Danny

Maybe you are looking for