VLAN issues when creating/modifying vNIC Templates

Sort of an odd issue, all of the VLANs that have been created do not show up when creating/modifying a vNIC Template.  All of the VLANs have been created globally under the LAN Cloud as well as Appliances.
I have 9 VLANs total, yet UCS Manager will only display 5 when modifying or creating a vNIC Template.
I'm running UCS Manager 1.4(1m) and am experiencing the same issue on another suite of UCS gear that is running 1.4(1i).  Anyone else experiencing the same?

I have seen odd issues with templates as they do not verify the values you are giving it.
Real world example:
You have 3 major deployment sites.  If someone scripts the configuration at site 1, folks in site 2 may have used a different ascii name on their vlan naming.  When you deploy the template, you give it VLAN_MGMT.  However, the device running that script for the templates has the same vlan BUT was named VLAN-MGMT.  Therefore, the templates will not show all the vlans.
To correct this, you could create the vlan necessary based on the naming convention and the template MAY reference it correctly.
Let us know if all the T's are crossed and I's are dotted. :-)

Similar Messages

  • Performance issues when creating a Report / Query in Discoverer

    Hi forum,
    Hope you are can help, it involves a performance issues when creating a Report / Query.
    I have a Discoverer Report that currently takes less than 5 seconds to run. After I add a condition to bring back Batch Status that = ‘Posted’ we cancelled the query after reaching 20 minutes as this is way too long. If I remove the condition the query time goes back to less than 5 seconds.
    Please see attached the SQL Inspector Plan:
    Before Condition
    SELECT STATEMENT
    SORT GROUP BY
    VIEW SYS
    SORT GROUP BY
    NESTED LOOPS OUTER
    NESTED LOOPS OUTER
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS OUTER
    NESTED LOOPS OUTER
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS OUTER
    NESTED LOOPS OUTER
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS
    AND-EQUAL
    INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS_N2
    INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS_N1
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES
    INDEX RANGE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_N1
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_SETS
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_SETS_U1
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_TL
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_TL_U1
    INDEX RANGE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_NORM_HIER_U1
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_LINES
    INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_JE_LINES_N1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_HEADERS
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_DAILY_CONVERSION_TYPES_U1
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_SOURCES_TL
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_SOURCES_TL_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_CATEGORIES_TL_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_BATCHES_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_BUDGET_VERSIONS_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_ENCUMBRANCE_TYPES_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_BATCHES
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_BATCHES_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_BATCHES_U1
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_PERIODS
    INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_PERIODS_U1
    After Condition
    SELECT STATEMENT
    SORT GROUP BY
    VIEW SYS
    SORT GROUP BY
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS OUTER
    NESTED LOOPS OUTER
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS OUTER
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS OUTER
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS OUTER
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS
    NESTED LOOPS OUTER
    NESTED LOOPS
    TABLE ACCESS FULL GL.GL_JE_BATCHES
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_BATCHES_U1
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_HEADERS
    INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_N1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_ENCUMBRANCE_TYPES_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_DAILY_CONVERSION_TYPES_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_BUDGET_VERSIONS_U1
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_SOURCES_TL
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_SOURCES_TL_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_CATEGORIES_TL_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_BATCHES_U1
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_LINES
    INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_JE_LINES_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS_U1
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_PERIODS
    INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_PERIODS_U1
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES
    INDEX RANGE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_N1
    INDEX RANGE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_NORM_HIER_U1
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_TL
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_TL_U1
    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_SETS
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_SETS_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
    Is there anything i can do in Discoverer Desktop / Administration to avoid this problem.
    Many thanks,
    Lance

    Hi Rod,
    I've tried the condition (Batch Status||'' = 'Posted') as you suggested, but the qeury time is still over 20 mins. To test i changed it to (Batch Status||'' = 'Unposted') and the query was returned within seconds again.
    I’ve been doing some more digging and have found the database view that is linked to the Journal Batches folder. See below.
    I think the problem is with the column using DECODE. When querying the column in TOAD the value of ‘P’ is returned. But in discoverer the condition is done on the value ‘Posted’. I’m not too sure how DECODE works, but think this could be the causing some sort of issue with Full Table Scans. How do we get around this?
    Lance
    DECODE( JOURNAL_BATCH1.STATUS,
    '+', 'Unable to validate or create CTA',
    '+*', 'Was unable to validate or create CTA',
    '-','Invalid or inactive rounding differences account in journal entry',
    '-*', 'Modified invalid or inactive rounding differences account in journal entry',
    '<', 'Showing sequence assignment failure',
    '<*', 'Was showing sequence assignment failure',
    '>', 'Showing cutoff rule violation',
    '>*', 'Was showing cutoff rule violation',
    'A', 'Journal batch failed funds reservation',
    'A*', 'Journal batch previously failed funds reservation',
    'AU', 'Showing batch with unopened period',
    'B', 'Showing batch control total violation',
    'B*', 'Was showing batch control total violation',
    'BF', 'Showing batch with frozen or inactive budget',
    'BU', 'Showing batch with unopened budget year',
    'C', 'Showing unopened reporting period',
    'C*', 'Was showing unopened reporting period',
    'D', 'Selected for posting to an unopened period',
    'D*', 'Was selected for posting to an unopened period',
    'E', 'Showing no journal entries for this batch',
    'E*', 'Was showing no journal entries for this batch',
    'EU', 'Showing batch with unopened encumbrance year',
    'F', 'Showing unopened reporting encumbrance year',
    'F*', 'Was showing unopened reporting encumbrance year',
    'G', 'Showing journal entry with invalid or inactive suspense account',
    'G*', 'Was showing journal entry with invalid or inactive suspense account',
    'H', 'Showing encumbrance journal entry with invalid or inactive reserve account',
    'H*', 'Was showing encumbrance journal entry with invalid or inactive reserve account',
    'I', 'In the process of being posted',
    'J', 'Showing journal control total violation',
    'J*', 'Was showing journal control total violation',
    'K', 'Showing unbalanced intercompany journal entry',
    'K*', 'Was showing unbalanced intercompany journal entry',
    'L', 'Showing unbalanced journal entry by account category',
    'L*', 'Was showing unbalanced journal entry by account category',
    'M', 'Showing multiple problems preventing posting of batch',
    'M*', 'Was showing multiple problems preventing posting of batch',
    'N', 'Journal produced error during intercompany balance processing',
    'N*', 'Journal produced error during intercompany balance processing',
    'O', 'Unable to convert amounts into reporting currency',
    'O*', 'Was unable to convert amounts into reporting currency',
    'P', 'Posted',
    'Q', 'Showing untaxed journal entry',
    'Q*', 'Was showing untaxed journal entry',
    'R', 'Showing unbalanced encumbrance entry without reserve account',
    'R*', 'Was showing unbalanced encumbrance entry without reserve account',
    'S', 'Already selected for posting',
    'T', 'Showing invalid period and conversion information for this batch',
    'T*', 'Was showing invalid period and conversion information for this batch',
    'U', 'Unposted',
    'V', 'Journal batch is unapproved',
    'V*', 'Journal batch was unapproved',
    'W', 'Showing an encumbrance journal entry with no encumbrance type',
    'W*', 'Was showing an encumbrance journal entry with no encumbrance type',
    'X', 'Showing an unbalanced journal entry but suspense not allowed',
    'X*', 'Was showing an unbalanced journal entry but suspense not allowed',
    'Z', 'Showing invalid journal entry lines or no journal entry lines',
    'Z*', 'Was showing invalid journal entry lines or no journal entry lines', NULL ),

  • Enabling Failover While creating the vNIC Template

    Hello all,
    As per my understanding enabling fail-over will create the secondary virtual path, which gives me the failover of vNIC automatically with the secondary virtual path that got created & the traffic will be routed towards another FI.
    While creating the vNIC templates & in most of the deployments i have seen.
    No one is considering the enable failover checkbox & I would like to know the pro's & corn's.
    In which situation do i need consider it ? What is the recommended practice?
    Looking forward for the suggestions.
    Regards,
    Gopi G

    Hi Gopi
    This failover flag made a lot of sense in the past, e.g. when Window server only supported one vnic.
    For VMware ESXi whether its vswitch, DVS, N1000v, it is recommended to not use this hardware failover flag, and let the OS switch handle it.
    see eg
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12211096/vnic-enable-failover-or-use-vmware
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12257101/cisco-ucs-network-uplink-aggregation-layer
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/72501/understanding-fabric-failure-and-failover-ucs
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12387816/lan-or-san-pin-group-ucsm
    Walter.

  • How to replace or insert a customer logo when creating a journal template?

    Hi Experts,
    How to replace or insert a customer logo when creating a journal template?
    Thanks in advance.
    Best regards,
    Mila

    Hi Dzmitry,
    Thank a lot for your reply.
    We have already tried to download the journal template and insert our logo. The problem is that the journal template is protected and we do not have the password.
    Kind regards,
    Mila

  • Layout issues when creating page from valid template

    Hi,
      I have a built a page from which I have created a template. Both page and template render perfectly in Live and Design view. Both preview in FF, Safari and IE with no problem.
    However, when I create a new page from the template, in Design View the page layout is pretty messed up. Lots of divs are wrapping and it appears that a clearing div is being ignored. In Live View, the page created from the template looks perfectly fine.
    So to me it appears DW is doing rendering a page created from a template differently. The HTML is valid markup and it is this one edge case that we're fighting right now. DW bug?
    To summarize:
    - Source page looks good in Live and Design View
    - Template created from source looks good in Live and Design View
    - A New Page created from Template looks good in Live View, messed up in Design View.
    - Source, Template and New Page all render correctly in FF, Safari and IE.
    Can anyone suggest a solution or even the next debugging steps?
    Regards,
    Nobby

    Hi there,
      I have uploaded the site as-is to a temp location:
    http://www.lakemeadowsopen.com/biglever
    The homepage is rendering no problem. The template in question can be found at:
    http://www.lakemeadowsopen.com/biglever/Templates
    and the name of the template is overview.dwt
    Thanks.

  • Error when creating a request Template In OIM

    Hello all,
    I have a very strange issue with OIM, it is when I try to create a request template, and put a restriction in Organization field, it creates the template and everything is fine. Suddenly, when I try to edit this template, the OIM shows a window with the next error:
    ADF_FACES-60096:Server Exception during PPR, #5 oracle.iam.platform.utils.MinLimitException: size < minimum limit
    I have found in other posts the "solution", It is to change in the database -> RequestTemplate Table -> Template Data Column, the restriction Organization from "the name of the organization" to "the Id of the organization", and restart the OIM, so after that, I can edit the template.
    Here is the issue that I don't understand,... few hours after, I want to edit the same template, and the OIM again shows the same error:
    ADF_FACES-60096:Server Exception during PPR, #5 oracle.iam.platform.utils.MinLimitException: size < minimum limit
    And if I review in the database the table, in the Template Data Column, the restriction of Organization has AGAIN the "Name of the organization".
    And I can again change that to the "Id of the organization", but it's time lost restarting the OIM. Time that I don't have, because Its more than one template.
    Please somebody could help me with this issue.

    Hello,
    I already found the solution to this issue.
    I had to restart the OIM server but also the DataBase and after that, this problem was solved.
    Thanks anyway.

  • Issue when creating sales order with Sold-to/Ship-to Party's state

    Hi All,
    we have issue while creating Sales Order with picking up of State tax
    for Ship-to-party & Sold-to-party.
    <b>When we create a sales order, for the sold to party 140052732 and
    ship to party 140052733 it is picking state tax. Which should not
    suppose to pick? Because the partner is marked as tax exemption</b>.
    Can any body tell me how can we solve this issue!
    Why this is happening!
    How to make not to pick tax when it is marked for tax exemtion.
    As i am not Functional guy i am not aware what is happening here!
    Can anybody solve this issue!
    Thanks in advance.
    Thanks,
    Deep.

    Hi Deep
    What do you mean by "It is picking up state tax"? Does it mean that in the pricing procedure it is picking up a condition type which is meant for state tax?
    If so go and check the condition record meant for it. Follow the following steps
    1) Go to Sales order
    2) Select the line item for which the state tax is being picked.
    3) In the condition tab select analysis.
    4) In Analysis you shall find the condition type meant for state tax.
    5) See which condition record has been found.
    6) Go to VK12, enter the state tax condition type and check the condition record for that state tax.
    7) If wrong correct it.
    8) If anything else come back to the post and inform the details
    Thanks
    Regards
    Sunil

  • Issue when creating sales order with Sold-to/Ship-to Party's state tax

    Hi All,
    we have issue while creating Sales Order with picking up of State tax
    for Ship-to-party & Sold-to-party.
    <b>When we create a sales order, for the sold to party 140052732 and
    ship to party 140052733 it is picking state tax. Which should not
    suppose to pick? Because the partner is marked as tax exemption</b>.
    Can any body tell me how can we solve this issue!
    Why this is happening!
    How to make not to pick tax when it is marked for tax exemtion.
    As i am not Functional guy i am not aware what is happening here!
    Can anybody solve this issue!
    Thanks in advance.
    Thanks,
    Deep.

    Hi Deep
    What do you mean by "It is picking up state tax"? Does it mean that in the pricing procedure it is picking up a condition type which is meant for state tax?
    If so go and check the condition record meant for it. Follow the following steps
    1) Go to Sales order
    2) Select the line item for which the state tax is being picked.
    3) In the condition tab select analysis.
    4) In Analysis you shall find the condition type meant for state tax.
    5) See which condition record has been found.
    6) Go to VK12, enter the state tax condition type and check the condition record for that state tax.
    7) If wrong correct it.
    8) If anything else come back to the post and inform the details
    Thanks
    Regards
    Sunil

  • Workflow issue when create Purchase Order automaticlly based on Sales Order

    dear experts,
    I got a problem when create purchase order automatically once the Sales Order created, the field ERNAE of the Purchase Order creatd is WF-BATCH, but we want this field to be the user log in the system, like John. Smith
    it seems this is a configuration issue, but i am not familar with workflow, do you experts have any solutions?
    thank you in advance.
    Hongtao

    thank you for you reply my friend.
    yes, i mean the PO creator.
    I just create a SO in VA01, then change the Schedule line category from CN to CP, then SAVE, then Confirm the Delivery Proposal. after all this, the PO will be created automatically by Workflow. Because when I display the PO via ME23N, it displays [Standard PO XXXXX  created by Workflow-System] on the top of the screen.
    But i do not know which workflow is trigered to create the PO. and i tried SWEL like you said, there is no record listed.
    do you have any other suggestions? thank you so much, friend.

  • Problems when Creating Pages from Templates in Dreamweaver 8

    When creating new pages from templates in Dreamweaver 8(Ver
    8.0.2). The full path for images is not created
    i.e. in template the code is <img src="main_page_logo.png"
    width="814" height="172" longdesc="Main Page Logo" />
    In the new file the code should be :-
    <img src="../../Templates/main_page_logo.png" width="814"
    height="172" longdesc="Main Page Logo" />
    but only :-
    <img src="main_page_logo.png" width="814" height="172"
    longdesc="Main Page Logo" /> is in the code.
    but this does work in Version 8.0.
    Does anyone know of a setting or fix for this problem

    > Does anyone know of a setting or fix for this problem
    It was regarded as a bug in previous versions, and was fixed
    in the 8.0.2
    release. In normal circumstances, ALL links in a template
    file must be
    relative to the template document, not relative to where you
    intend to save
    the child pages. Thus, there would be no way to have a link
    in your
    template document like the first one you show, e.g.,
    <img src="whatever.png"....
    *unless* the file was actually in the Templates folder (a bad
    idea).
    In 8.0.2, you can set your PREFERENCES for the Templates
    category to NOT
    MANAGE relative links. Be aware that this may have unintended
    consequences
    for you - specifically regarding other relative links in your
    site.
    Murray --- ICQ 71997575
    Adobe Community Expert
    (If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
    ==================
    http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com
    - Template Triage!
    http://www.projectseven.com/go
    - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
    http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
    Tutorials & Resources
    http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/
    - Macromedia (MM) Technotes
    ==================
    "pgs_it" <[email protected]> wrote in
    message
    news:eivj88$361$[email protected]..
    > When creating new pages from templates in Dreamweaver
    8(Ver 8.0.2). The
    > full
    > path for images is not created
    > i.e. in template the code is <img
    src="main_page_logo.png" width="814"
    > height="172" longdesc="Main Page Logo" />
    > In the new file the code should be :-
    > <img src="../../Templates/main_page_logo.png"
    width="814" height="172"
    > longdesc="Main Page Logo" />
    > but only :-
    > <img src="main_page_logo.png" width="814"
    height="172" longdesc="Main Page
    > Logo" /> is in the code.
    > but this does work in Version 8.0.
    > Does anyone know of a setting or fix for this problem
    >
    >
    >

  • Issue when creating a new email account on Adobe BC

    Hi,
    I got a big issue when I tried to create a new email account for my site, which is a very email account to me, and I had been using that email address for over 10 years.
    Here is the issue, When I created this email account, Adobe BC keep telling me that account has been created (please see the screen shots below), but I did not see this email account on the BC's backend email account list at all. I tried to create that email for over dozen times, it just won't work!
    Please anyone who can help me on this, or anyone from Adobe BC tech support team, please contact with me. Becasue I having hard time finding your tech support telephone numeber.
    Thank You.

    Hello designonly.
    You are saying that you have been using that email address for over 10 years. So you are trying to make an address which already somewhere exists?
    That brings me to another thing - is the DNS setup made well? In order to make email address work, you should edit the A-Name & NS. Sometime even more settings (depend on domain registrar).
    designonly, is this your first email setup?

  • Error of Owner Property when create a BPF Template in BPC 7.5 Netweawer

    Hi Expert
    I found this error when I create a BPF Template in BPC 7.5 Version Netweawer . Could you please advise for solve it.
    BPF: Validation error; member "AS001" in step "3-Sales Export Plan" has no active owners
    BPF: Validation error; member "AS001" in step "3-Sales Export Plan" has no active reviewers
    BPF: Validation error; member "A001" in step "1-Assumption " has no active owners
    BPF: Validation error; member "A001" in step "1-Assumption " has no active reviewers
    BPF: Validation error; member "AS001" in step "2-Production Plan" has no active owners
    BPF: Validation error; member "AS001" in step "2-Production Plan" has no active reviewers
    BPF: Validation error; drive dimension of Production Plan mismatched to previous step
    Thanks for your advise
    Suphawat

    Hi,
    In 2nd step of BPF template creation while defining step you should assign driver dimension by clicking on Define Step Region Criteria and choose owner property from that dimension.
    Have you maintained Owner property in Entity dimension.If yes you can choose driver dimension as Entity and owner property as Owner.
    Hope it helps..
    regards,
    Raju

  • Gender issue when creating Child Record in ESS

    Dear experts,
    I'm currently have a problem when creating new child for family infotype (0021). Everytime I create a new child record, the gender will always be 'Male' eventhough when I input the data, I choose the 'Female' radiobutton, but when I choose Next and display the 'Review' page, the gender will always be Male.
    It make sense if it is creating a spouse record, since the spouse must be an opposite gender, but supposedly I can change the gender freely when I create the child record.
    Is there something I missed out in the customization process? Or is there anything else that could solve this problem?
    I found a topic that almost similar to our problem in Gender Unknown after selecting female/male in Family data But in that topic the gender will always set to  'Unknown', in our problem it will always set to 'Male'
    Thank you for all the answers

    Hi madav ,
    create inforecord me11
    vender name
    mat
    purchase org
    plant
    maintain that and enter,
    go to text  maintain, then click on condition hear maintain as per as the  requirement,
    go back
    click on purchase organization data  then save
    u will not get error .
    hope it will help u .
    thanks
    BIswa

  • BUGREPORT: Timestamp issue when creating new url mappings

    We have come accross and issue when adding multiple databases and subsiqent url mappings.
    the issue presented in the log is
    ####<Nov 16, 2012 10:49:52 AM CST> <Error> <HTTP> <adeoraapp03.santos.com> <WLS_APEX> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1353025192413> <BEA-101020> <[ServletContext@955221946[app:apex module:apex.war path:/apex spec-version:2.5]] Servlet failed with Exception
    java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Not a correctly formatted timestamp: 2012-11-15T23:52:58.0080Z
         at oracle.dbtools.common.util.Timestamps.valueOf(Timestamps.java:61)
         at oracle.dbtools.common.config.db.UrlMappings$Builder$1PoolFilter.startElement(UrlMappings.java:199)
         at oracle.dbtools.common.x3p.MatchFilter.startElement(MatchFilter.java:54)
         at oracle.dbtools.common.x3p.impl.Event.invoke(Event.java:52)
         at oracle.dbtools.common.x3p.impl.Chain$EventIterator.advance(Chain.java:125)
         at oracle.dbtools.common.x3p.impl.Chain$EventIterator.advance(Chain.java:79)
         at oracle.dbtools.common.util.AbstractIterator.next(AbstractIterator.java:28)
         at oracle.dbtools.common.x3p.impl.X3PReaderAdaptor.next(X3PReaderAdaptor.java:34)
         at oracle.dbtools.common.config.db.UrlMappings$Builder.read(UrlMappings.java:170)
         at oracle.dbtools.common.config.db.UrlMappings.existing(UrlMappings.java:99)
         at oracle.dbtools.common.config.db.UrlMappings.urlMappings(UrlMappings.java:93)
         at oracle.dbtools.common.config.db.DatabasePoolConfig.loadFromXML(DatabasePoolConfig.java:285)
         at oracle.dbtools.common.config.db.DatabasePoolConfig.loadFromDBFromTime(DatabasePoolConfig.java:181)
         at oracle.dbtools.common.config.db.DatabasePoolConfig.getPoolInfo(DatabasePoolConfig.java:54)
         at oracle.dbtools.rt.jdbc.DatabaseConnectionFilter.poolInfo(DatabaseConnectionFilter.java:60)
         at oracle.dbtools.rt.jdbc.DatabaseConnectionFilter.applyDatabaseConnectionInfo(DatabaseConnectionFilter.java:71)
         at oracle.dbtools.rt.web.HttpEndpointBase.service(HttpEndpointBase.java:119)
         at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:820)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper$ServletServiceAction.run(StubSecurityHelper.java:227)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper.invokeServlet(StubSecurityHelper.java:125)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.execute(ServletStubImpl.java:301)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.execute(ServletStubImpl.java:184)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.wrapRun(WebAppServletContext.java:3732)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.run(WebAppServletContext.java:3696)
         at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:321)
         at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:120)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.securedExecute(WebAppServletContext.java:2273)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.execute(WebAppServletContext.java:2179)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.run(ServletRequestImpl.java:1490)
         at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:256)
         at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:221)
    >
    This seems to be due to a time format issue when adding new database mapping in the url-mappings
    when running the following command
    @:as11g_pfrd_prod> java -jar apex.war map-url --type base-path /apexpoc apexpoc
    Nov 16, 2012 10:22:57 AM oracle.dbtools.common.config.file.ConfigurationFolder logConfigFolder
    INFO: Using configuration folder: /data1/software/oracle/product/as11g_pfrd_prod/user_projects/domains/PFRD_Domain/servers/WLS_APEX/apex_config/apex
    @:as11g_pfrd_prod> pwd
    /data1/software/oracle/product/as11g_pfrd_prod/user_projects/domains/PFRD_Domain/servers/WLS_APEX/stage/apex
    After running the command the following entry was added to url mappings file
    This resulted in the following entries in url-mapping.xml, (the timestamps are in to be in UTC):
    <pool base-path="/apexpoc" name="apexpoc" updated="2012-11-15T23:52:58.0080Z"/>
    Which caused the above stack trace and also caused a internal error 500 on the browser when trying to access APEX
    we removed the url mapping and ran the following command(at a different time in the day)
    @:as11g_pfrd_prod> pwd
    /data1/software/oracle/product/as11g_pfrd_prod/user_projects/domains/PFRD_Domain/servers/WLS_APEX/stage/apex
    @:as11g_pfrd_prod> java -jar apex.war map-url --type base-path /apexpoc apexpoc
    Nov 16, 2012 10:58:35 AM oracle.dbtools.common.config.file.ConfigurationFolder logConfigFolder
    INFO: Using configuration folder: /data1/software/oracle/product/as11g_pfrd_prod/user_projects/domains/PFRD_Domain/servers/WLS_APEX/apex_config/apex
    which resulted in a new entry in the url mappings table
    <pool base-path="/apexpoc" name="apexpoc" updated="2012-11-16T00:28:35.479Z"/>
    And the apex listener worked again

    Thanks Colm,
    Was this a known issue? If so do we have a common "thread" for known issues?
    And do we have any idea when 2.0 Final is coming out?

  • Issue when creating production order

    Hi I encountered below error message when creating the production order:
    error or warning occurrred during master data transfer,I had checked BOM and operation,all is ok (validty date),what's wrong?

    Read the master data Once again IN production order
    Thru Function --> read master data
    If You get the error
    Go to -- log --> read PP master data, You can find the error
    Share The error message

Maybe you are looking for