Warehouse management - how to de-confirm a transfer order item
This is probably not the best forum for the question, but you guys are the best so here goes:
In our warehouse we create transfer orders for picking. We can confirm them via LT12 to confirm the entire Transfer order, or use LT11 to confirm each item of the transfer order one at a time. Is there any way to de-confirm (IE cancel the confirmation that was previously done) for an item of the transfer order. It looks like our only option is to cancel the entire transfer order. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
HI
To confirm Transfer Order--LT12
Regards
Srinivas
Similar Messages
-
In warehouse management how to post stock in the warehouse by using physica
hi
in warehouse management how to post stock in the warehouse by using physical inventory method
can anyone tell me the process in detail
thanksin advance.HI ,
In Ware house management you can block the stock for Physical Inventory purpose. You cannot post the stock to the warehouse using Physical Invenory.
If there is a count going on so the concerned Warehouse bin is to be blocked during Inventory so that no further goods movement is possible during that period.
Once the Physical Inventory ids done the block can be released so that the movement can again happen.
The Inventory mangement initiates the transfer requirement. This transfer requirement is used for creating the transfer orders. The transfer order confirmation is done then which actually places the stock in the concerned bin mentioned in the order.
The stock in WM can be checked in LX24/ LX26 which is same as theat of MMBE of MM.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Prasanna
Award pls if helpful. -
Auto Confirmation of transfer order - 999 mvt from storage type W01 to S01
Hi,
I am trying to automate the confirmation of transfer orders between storage type W01 and S01 using a 999 movement type. The 999 movement type appears to work perfectly when doing a bin to bin movement within the W01 storage type (for example move batch abc from bin 01 to bin 02) no confirmations are required. However if I transfer from a bin in W01 storage type to the S01 storage type (which only has a single bin to represent a staging area) a manual confirmation of the transfer order is required via lt24 or lt12. It appears therefore that the issue is with the storage type S01 for this particular Warehouse. The setting to confirm the TO immediately is already activated for movt 999 in customizing, is there a setting for the storage type that must be defined.
Regards,F1 help for field V_T333-SQUIT:
Means that the transfer order item can be confirmed immediately during the creation procedure.
SAP online help:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/c6/f83e4d4afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
To set the confirmation requirement for foreground processing, select the indicator for TO item can be confirmed immediately.
As per my understanding the immediate confirmation indicator does not mean that the transfer order will be confirmed immediately. It makes possible that during the creation of transfer order you CAN put a flag in the confirmation checkbox.
If you use it together with "propose confirmation" flag (setting for WM movement type; V_T333-VQUIT), the falg in confirmation check box will be populated automatically during TO creation.
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on May 10, 2011 11:22 AM -
Error in confirmation of Transfer orders at Header level (TC LRF2)
Hello All,
A transfer order has single item. It has got confirmed at the item level for the full quantity. The confirmation switchbox at item level is checked in by the system automatically. But in header level the switch box is not checked in.
While trying to confirm the Transfer order at header level, the error message shows that the Transfer order is already confirmed. But the Transfer order still exists in LRF2.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Sasi.Hi Marcos
Note 566995 is an old correction note, which is probably already implemented on your system but it describes the standard system design regarding confirmations posted in mass processing transactions:
When you enter an operation confirmation via the order info system or the mass processing the system now sets the confirmation type to 'Automatic final confirmation' as well as the indicator 'Post open reservations'. Thus the system automatically generates a final confirmation when you confirm the whole planned quantity and the operation receives status CNF (finally confirmed) instead of PCNF (partially confirmed).
System is designed that way because a mass processing transaction will be generally executed in background mode and a huge number of confirmations can be posted at the same time. Therefore, user will not be able to enter any value to the confirmation.
If you don't want this behaviour you could use the BAPI
BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_HDR to develop your own mass processing transaction to post confirmations.
BR
Caetano -
Confirming a Transfer Order for RF
I am trying to find a BAPI or function module that will confirm a transfer order for use with a RF device. We have tried using a BDC, but it is too unreliable because of the limit on the number of handling units that it can do at 1 time from the same bin. If you have a way of confirming 30 or more handling units using transaction LT12 in a BDC, I will try that as well.
Thanks.
Edited by: Paul Sullivan on Jun 3, 2008 5:36 PMHello ,
you could try with BAPI_SHIPMENT_CHANGE,
but it's released and not documented. So, it's at own risk.
Regards Wolfgang -
Lock a Transfer Order /Item ...
Hello
Using the following FM to lock a Transfer Order / Item
*Lock Transfer Order/Item#
CALL FUNCTION 'ENQUEUE_ELLTAPE'
EXPORTING
mode_ltap = 'E'
mandt = sy-mandt
lgnum = gs_ltak-lgnum
tanum = gs_ltak-tanum
tapos = gs_ltak-tapos
EXCEPTIONS
foreign_lock = 1
system_failure = 2
OTHERS = 3.
This works fine for the current user, he cannot start another session and retrieve this Transfer Order/Item. But a different user can access this Transfer Order/Item. I would like to lock for all users not just the current user. Am I missing something? I notice there is a Scope parameter for this FM, do I need to use this parameter?
GaryTry
ENQUEUE_ELLTAKE -> Header
ENQUEUE_ELLTAPE -> Line Item
hith
Sunil -
Two-step confirmation of Transfer order in WM
Hi
We are confirguring 2 step confirmation.
We have activated 2step conf, for the warehouse & marked corfirmation mandatory for the storage types,
However we are not able to perform confirmation for Pick & Transfer step.
Please let us know on how to configure two step confirmation.
Thanks,Hello Abhay Desai,
Please kindly refer to SAP Library which has provided the following documentation on 2-step picking:
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/c6/f83e4d4afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
I would suggest you to go through the prerequisites and steps in 2-steps pikcing in the given documentation. You should also be able to access to above with the following path:
http://help.sap.com >> SAP Library
--> SAP ERP Central Component
--> Logistics
--> Logistic Execution
--> Warehouse Management System
--> Goods Issue
--> Two Step Picking.
Hope the above helps. If question answered, please close and reward points. Otherwise feel free to get back. -
Order Confirmation (PM) & Transfer Order (WM)
Hi all,
following this path
SPRO > Logistics Execution > Warehouse Management > Interfaces Inventory > Management > Activate Automatic TO Creation
we have activated the automatic TO creation.
We have maintained the value "X" in the column "Indicator: Create transfer order immediately" for all the Movement types. Indeed, creating a good issue (from MIGO transaction) the system offers the OT screen.
But creating a good issue from the IW41 transaction (Create PM Order Confirmation) the system behaves differently.
How I can align the two behaviors? I don't want to retain the MM stock misaligned compared to the WM stock.
Thanks,
Marco.
Edited by: Marco Cariello on Jul 14, 2009 12:36 PMHow I can align the two behaviors? I don't want to retain the MM stock misaligned compared to the WM stock.
Generally, you cannot cause inconsistency between IM and WM stock via simple GI posting. If you detach your WH from an operating IM SLoc, you can cause...(just one example)
Is WM/PP interface switched on?
If yes, no TO is generated at the time of GI - SAP directly consumes it from the interim storage type 100. Reason is that TO creation is before GI in this case: TR is generated (e.g.) at the release of PrdOrd and processing that TR from LB10, you get the TO.
SPRO > LE > WM > Interfaces > Define Prdouction
I'm not sure but it can be a possible cause of the behaviour of the system you face...
Regards,
Csaba -
Automatic Confirmation of Transfer Order
Hello,
I have the following Scenario.
I have 3 Warehouses defined, 1 for Reception material, 2 for finished goods. And it supoused to have the same configuration parameters.
WH number 100 (Reception material area) when I do a movement with MB1A mvt type 201 or 261, and generate the TO via LT06, the TO is not confirmed.
But with the WH numbers 200 and 300 (finished goods area) doing the same example, Txn MB1A mov types 201 or 261, and generate the TO via LT06, the TO is automatically confirmed.
I just check the Automatic COnfirmation section and for the 3 Warehouse have same parameters.
What could be affecting? Will exist a user exit to control this?Hi Marco,
Please check SAP online help how confirmation is controlled:
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/c6/f83e4d4afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Please also check help in IMG:
SPRO > LE > WM > Activities > Confirmation
You will see that confirmation is coontrolled trough:
- warehouse ID (whether 2-step confirmation is allowed)
- storage type
- movement type
If your settings at movement type are the same and you experience different behaviour in your WHs, please check your settings of storage types.
SPRO > LE > WM > Activities > Confirmation - Storage type
You have to check settings of destinaton storage types (910; 914) in WH 100, 200, 300 as well as settings of source storage types.
If there's no difference please check transacton LT06 itself - if you execute it in foreground mode it is possible to put a flag in confirmation checkbox.
Please also check user exits in SE38. Here you can find list of possible user exits:
SPRO > LE > WM > Tools > Develop User Exits for WM
...or please switch to debug mode and check from where confirmation req. comes...
Regards,
Csaba -
How to deactivate field "transmit item to subsystem" in Transfer Order item
Hi all,
I'm trying to send IDoc of Transfer order and I already configured in OMKY and it already worked.
But when I confirm transfer order in T-code: LT12, I have to select field "item to sub-system" and I don't want to do.
How can I deactivate this field or it's not possible. Please advise me.
Thanks and Regards.
Su P.
Edited by: Supaporn R. on Nov 19, 2008 7:26 PMHi
Following may resolve your issue
Go to Transaction MASS
Select Object BUS2032 Then execute
select MASSVBAP-PRCTR Profit Center then execute
now give your sales order number or numbers with range
and select your required Profit Center (Which you want to change ) then execute
hope this may solve your issue
Cheers
Shambhu Sarkar -
Unwanted automatic confirmation of transfer order
Hi,
I am kind of out of good ideas. The problem is following:
I pick for production orders to fixed bins using several different WM movement types. When I am low on stock the production orders then cannibalizes on each other when picking in background. I dont have "propose confirmation" set in any of the WM movement types concerned.
Ex.
2 pcs are in interim storage type 914, then I generate a transfer order for interim storage type 924 (copy of 914), which picks from 914 and confirms automatically.
thanks for any ideas of what else to check.Hi,
the thing I need to understand is:
1. why does the transfer order pick from another interim storage type in background.
2. why does this type of movement between interims auto-confirm
thanks -
User exits for delivery picking confirmation and transfer order creation
Hi
We have a scenario for which we need help.
This is to do with replenishment from plant to plant.
We have sales sets.
The sales sets needs to be replenished from one plant to another. We want the componenets of the sales sets to picked from the issuing plant. For this we need a transfer order. this needs tobe confirmed and then the goods issue should take place from the issuing plant. Its a two step process.
we are doing Sales sets in STO. The explosion takes place in STO. However when we create deliveries for this. Only the sales set header item without its components are flowing into the delivery.
The Tranfer order does not contain the components either.
However post the goods issue we can create a TO with reference to the TR. This is is not acceptable because we want the picking and confirmation to occur before PGI from the issuing plant.
Could anybody help: We want the TO to be created with the components even though in the delivery only the Sales set header appears. Can u suggest a user exit in which when we create the TR from the delivery the components of the set.
After confirmation of the TO then we want the picking status to be put as C.
SupreethHi,
Check the following users exits.
MWMRFSSG user exit for sorting TOs in RF system-guided transaction
MWMRFUP Customer defined general purpose pushbutton called from scr.
MWMRP001 Cust. Exit for Fixed Bin Replenish.: Delivery Item Selection
MWMRP002 Cust. Exit for Fixed Bin Replenishment: TR Quantity Distr.
MWMRP003 Customer Exit for Replenishment using RLLNACH1
MWMRP004 User Exit for Replenishment using RLLNACH4
MWMTO001 Enhancements for end of transfer order generation
MWMTO010 Exit: Calculation of Total Planned TO Processing Time
MWMTO011 Correction of Planned Processing Time for TO Item
MWMTO012 Correction of Sorting and Split Transfer Order
MWMTO013 Stock Removal for Sev. Storage Types as in Stringent FIFO
MWMTOAU3 Separate selection of posting changes for autom.TO creation
MWMTR001 Exits at the end of transfer rqmnt creation (IM,PP interf.)
MWMD0001 Transfer order print via RLVSDR40
MWMD0002 Transfer order print as multiple process with RLKOMM40
MWMIDI07 Enhancement for Output WMPIHU (Create Pick-HU) Inbound
MWMIDO11 Enhancement for message WMTORD: TO with several items
MWMIDO12 Enhancement for Output WMPIHU (Pick-HUs) Outbound
MWMIDO13 Extension for WMMBXY (subsequent tasks after goods movement)
MWMPP001 Enhancement WM/PP Interface (automatic TR generation)
Regards,
Murali -
Customized RF transaction for Confirmation of Transfer Order for WM
Hello everyone !
I need to develop a customized RF transaction for tcode LM05 and LT11. where i need to call custome screens for
1. Select transfer order - ( which will fetched from any handheld device like BARCODE scanner )
2. Navigate to screen SOURCE INFORMATION - Multiple Materials on pressing on NEXT button the control goes to
3. Destination Information - Multiple Materials and on ENTER pushbutton the TO gets confirmed.
Basically i need to create ZLM05 and do the above.
Please can any one provide the steps to achieve the above funcitonality ,
Thanks & Regards,Solved
-
How to do INIT for Sales order Itema Data (DS 2LIS_11_VAITM)
Hi all
I have a report on sales order item data, I have to reload it. DS 2LIS_11_VAITM
Can any of you pls explain me the steps to do the INIT? Refill set up tables etc
Many Thanks in advance
IshiHi Hari
Many Thanks for the explanation and steps. I deleted set up tables and executed to fill it.
It says in R/3 Start of Processing, I ticked to continue and its still running.
In the mean time I checked RSA3 and it says 1007 records selected. I am refreshing it and the no. of records are still the same.
Can you tell me how long it takes to fill the table?
And the R/3 system is still running (Start of Processing)
Thanks again
Ishi -
How can I terminate the purchase order item?
Dear all,
I have created and released a purchase order, which had two items. like following
Item Material no qty delivery date
10 Material-A 1000 pcs 12-25-2008
20 Material-B 300 pcs 12-28-2008
This purchase order has been released. And the vendor production order had been released and producted too. Item 10 has been producted and deliveried 300 pcs to our company. Now the purchase department asked to terminate the item 10. They didn't want the 700 pcs left.
So we have to cancel the purchase order item 10. But we couldn't terminate this item.
How can I do? Please tell me how to do step by step.
Thank you very much!
Paul.Dear,
You can't delete purchase order at header level.
You have to deleter purchase order line item wise.
You can do it with ME22N t-code.
Enter t-code ME22N, Select all line item of purchase order and click on delete indicator.
Otherwise click on Delivery complete indicator of purchase order.
You can also delete purchase order line item wise with MASS t-code.
Enter t-code MASS, Select object BUS2012, Go in Field tab and select field MASSEKKO-LOEKZ and click on execute button.
Then enter your purchase order documents number and enter indicator for deletion as X.
Regards,
Sri
Maybe you are looking for
-
How to get Port Classifications for Logical Switch via scvmm console
Hello All, We are creating some automation tool based on SCVMM console scripts. In order to create vm we need to assign port classification based on Virtual Switch and then logical switch. The problem is that I could not find any way to retrieve po
-
No audio except when booting up
MacBook Pro 15" mid-2010 2.66 G Intel Core i7 4 G 1067 MHz DDR3 OS X 10.8.5 My audio is gone, except for the sound when booting up. The speaker icon is grayed out. When I go to System Preferences->Sound->Output, the internal speakers are not there. T
-
Last night, my iPad 2 fell so gently that I don't even understand what happened. Anyways, it fell off the bed and now the screen is green and fuzzy. I read somewhere that there was a hardware problem and also that it could have moved something that m
-
Hi All, I'm having a problem creating a BDC interface for PA40. When selecting the personnel actions, I need to use the page down button which is ok code '=P+'. For some reason this doesn't seem to work. Any ideas why? Is there some way around this b
-
Submitting data from PDF vs. HTML
I have a PDF form rendered from LC Forms that I have been using for a while. It has a submit button on it that has been set to submit the form field data as XML Data. This has been working fine. I now have saved the form as an XDP and am rendering it