Weblogic portal content published for future date.

Hi,
I am using Weblogic portal 10.3, need to publish a content item for futhre date , i tried adding the date and time to startDate property and published it, and the changes got reflected immediately.
has any one got his done.
Regards
Chandrakant

Hi Deepak,
Case 1 -
Assuming that there is a version which is currently displayed on the portal, if the business has published 3 future versions already (not yet published on portal), then he can make any changes in any of the future versions and have them automatically published.
Case 2 -
If there is a version which is currently displayed and there are 2 future versions published in the repository already, if the business user wants to make any changes in the current version, he just changes and re-publishes for the updated stuff to appear on the portal.
Case 3 - overlaps
Incase of 2 published versions with the same start dates but varying end dates, as the content selector will pick up both the nodes into the arraylist. In that case we can write a comparator, which incase of same start dates, do a comparison on the version id, and then pick the latest version. but in that case, we may lose one version. I guess in that case, we will have to advise the user handling this versionong to provide sequential dates for all the versions.
I hope I have got the issue right and covered all the cases.
Thanks

Similar Messages

GL assignment for future date?

Hi everybody,
We have an issue is as follows:
- We have created a sales order for 08-09-2008
- We have created PO for 08-09-2008, here system will able to post everything fine.
- Again we are creating one more PO for 08-09-2009, here system threws error message like GL a/c needs cost assignment.
My question is why system is asking assignment for future date only and why system is not asking assignment for current date?
Looking forward your best thoughts
regards
vk

Hi Raj,
Thanks for your reply
Yes, we have assigned only cost element in TC: OKB9. But, for that cost element we have created 2 analysis periods.
- GL 100115 01.01.2008 to 31.12.2008
- GL 100115 01.01.2009 to 31.12.9999
I think validity period is perfect still system threws error message like gl acc needs cost object assign.
regards
vk

RWDPOSUP For future date articles postings.

Hi All,
Currently we are running the program RWDPOSUP for sending articles from sap to third party.
I have a query.the system will pick articles which have a valid date from today or a specified number of days for example 30 days
all the validity is stored in the field DATAB of table A073 for instance(Pricing condition tables)..
So if the pricing has to be changed on march first then it takes the data on feb first and runs the idoc and data is sent to third party.
So if i post a document today i.e., 21st march 2010with date of validity as march first 2011. then ideally it should not pick and create an IDOC.
It should pick on feb first or jan 29th(30days before) and then create idoc. will the program RWDPOSUP run as desired.
for me if the DATAB is more than 30 days it should not create an IDOC only articles withing 30days are to be sent to third party.
Can you please suggest on this. i am searching where it looks for date validation but not succesful in that search.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
RK.

Hi,
I have changed it from W to E and saved , still system is prompting any message at all
document is getting posted for future date also .
in MB1B screen posting date is changeble field and if i try to put tomorrow date and try posting its getting posted
please help
please try at your end once .
regards,
madhu kiran.
Edited by: madhu kiran on Apr 24, 2009 11:19 AM

Expense reports are not processing for future date?

hi folks,
in our co.expense reports are not processing for future date, even though the end date is one month from now the expense reports are not getting paid.
can anybody assist me to come out of this issue.
thanks in advance,
regards
bhanu

HI,
Could you please share how to go Debug mode in Dymanic program, I have scenarion in SAP HR , when Employee is hire , during the hiring action Infotype 32 is updating based on following conditions
********INSERT IT0032 FOR CANDIDATE ID *************
P0001-PERSG<>'5' - True
P0000-MASSN='01'/X
P0000-MASSN='H1'/X
P0000-MASSN<>'84'/X
P0000-MASSN<>'86'/X
P0000-MASSN<>'99'/X
GET_PNALT(ZHR_CREATEP0032)
RP50D-FIELDS <> ''
INS,0032,,,(P0000-BEGDA),(P0000-ENDDA)/D
P0032-PNALT=RP50D-FIELD1
P0032-ZZ_COMPID='05' _ True
Infotype record is being created but there is no data in "RP50D-FIELD1 , so i tried to debug the subroutine GET_PNALT(ZHR_CREATEP0032) as mention in Dynamic action, its not going in debugger mode.
Do you have any Idea about how to debug the program. used in dynamic action
Regards,
Madhu

Portal content BP for EHS

Hi EHS gurus,
I would like to know whether there is any BP for SAP Portal content(EP7) for EHS(ECC6). I have found a BP BPEHS501_0-20000614 and imported in SAP portal. I got a role with pages for Industrial Hygiene&Safety and Product Safety. Is this all or is there any other BP for EHS.
Can you please let me know on this ASAP as i have to get back to the client on this.
P.S: XEM is out of our scope.We are going for basic EHS feature as this is a university implementation.
regards
Bharat.

Closing the thread as no reply has come

Portal Content Guide for understanding the MDM Configuration.

hi friends,
I need Portal Content Guide for understanding the MDM Configuration pdf file..
please send that file in pdf format
thanks
ramu

Hi,
You can access the below link.
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_mdm550/helpdata/en/45/c87d0243e56f75e10000000a1553f6/frameset.htm]
Regards,
Jitesh Talreja

Time phase Min/max replenishment models for future dates

Hi,
We are working on a safety stock requirement of Maximum/Minimum replenishment model in APO.
It seems to work great except it cannot be time phased. Our business wants different safety stock strategies at different times of the year.
Please suggest if there is a way that we could “time phase” min/max replenishment models for future dates?
Thanks in advance for your help!
regards
Yogendra

Many thanks for this.
I can see entirely why it's designed as such, but I just find it slightly frustrating that there's no way to break the link between the order and the shipment out to the depot. Just to clarify, we're not requiring the orders to change - they will still be made and will come in - but just that the orders themselves don't specifically need to be the stock that is used for the replenishment.
So -
1. Min Max identifies depot needs replenishing.
2. Central distribution does not have (enough) stock to replenish.
3. Order is made to replenish central distributions stock.
4. We ship whatever we've got, when we've got it, to depot to replenish.
It's the bit where Min-Max is trying to replensih a specific depot rather than our central distribution centre that's my problem.
I suspect that, as you say, that specific issue is not directly fixable without getting our IT contractors to do a customisation.
I'm going to look into your Supply Date Offset suggestion now, though I'm not sure how this affects the shipping after the orders are placed. The orders themselves are approved manually after we've checked our stock position (i.e. what's in with the recycling team), but we recycle & refurb probably 60% of our maint stock so there'll always be kit turning up after the order has been made because of the long lead times.
Thanks again.

JDBC TX Settings for Weblogic Portal Content Repo Datasources

I have a scenario where I require two WLP content stores for the application. If I set the individual datasources to Support Global Transactions = True, then the application throws TX errors: ...Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: Connection has already been created in this tx context for pool named PMRestDataSource. Illegal attempt to create connection from another pool: portalDataSource.
What I did to solve this was isolate the Content Repo datasource from the portalDataSource (in fact, it is in a separate database schema from the portal framework artifacts in the Production environment), and set both of the Content-specific datasources to Support Global Transactions = False that fixed the issue.
The question I have is this: Is there any reason I need TX support for datasources that exclusively support connecting to a WLP Content Store?
Thanks in advance for your help!
Reference content-config.xml:
<content-store>
<name>PM Repository</name>
<description>Default Content Repository Configuration</description>
<class-name>com.bea.content.spi.internal.ExtendedRepositoryImpl</class-name>
<repository-property>
<description>Data source to use.</description>
<name>CM_DATA_SOURCE</name>
<value>PMRepoDataSource</value>
</repository-property>
<repository-property>
<description>Enable repository events for full-text search.</description>
<name>cm_fireRepositoryEvents</name>
<value>false</value>
</repository-property>
<read-only>false</read-only>
<binary-cache-max-entry-size>1024</binary-cache-max-entry-size>

<search-is-enabled>true</search-is-enabled>

<fulltext-search-is-enabled>true</fulltext-search-is-enabled>
<search-indexing-is-enabled>true</search-indexing-is-enabled>
</content-store>
<content-store>
<name>REST Repository</name>
<description>REST Content Repository Configuration</description>
<class-name>com.bea.content.spi.internal.ExtendedRepositoryImpl</class-name>
<repository-property>
<description>Data source to use.</description>
<name>CM_DATA_SOURCE</name>
<value>PMRestDataSource</value>
</repository-property>
<repository-property>
<description>Enable repository events for full-text search.</description>
<name>cm_fireRepositoryEvents</name>
<value>false</value>
</repository-property>
<read-only>false</read-only>
<binary-cache-max-entry-size>1024</binary-cache-max-entry-size>

<search-is-enabled>true</search-is-enabled>

<fulltext-search-is-enabled>false</fulltext-search-is-enabled>
<search-indexing-is-enabled>true</search-indexing-is-enabled>
</content-store>

I created the table manually and run the scripts again while creating new weblogic domain and its working fine now.
What can I say is this particular *<install_home>/wlportal_10.3/portal/db/oracle/pf9_create_tables.sql.sql* is not executed as per the jdbc log which I saw.

Restrict Time Entry for Future Date in Portal

Hi Gurus,
My scenario is to restrict users from entering future date attendance in Portal.
I know the configurations for restrictiong the user from scrolling to future week.
But in my scenario users will be able to scroll to future weeks but should be restricted with an error message while trying to enter future time.
Please let me know if you have any suggestions.
Thanks.
Regards
Sairam Maharaj S
Please search in the ESS forum as I remember responding to a similar scenario some time back. Thread is moved.
~Suresh

Hi Srini,
Thanks for your reply.
I have achieved this by deselcting Release Future Time option. But user wants the future time to be restricted even from getting saved. Can I make changes to the default information message "1 out of 1 future time not released" to an error message so that the user will not be able to save. If so please let me know if this can be achieved from any configuration of messages or it should be done from the programming side.
Thanks.
Regards
Sairam Maharaj S

Restricting the Travel expense claims for future date

Hi,
We are configuring the BPs for ESS & MSS. Currently we are on NW portal 7.0 ,SPS15 and ECC6.0 at the backend.
Can anyone suggest us, how to restrict the users NOT to apply the Travel expense claims for the future dates (i.e.the portal system is expected to allow the users for the claims, till the current date or any past date but not any future date) through portal.
Currently, the system is allowing the users to apply the Travel Expense claims for the future dates also.
Any help on this will be appreciated.
Regards,
Venu

Hi Venu,
I am not sure whether there is any configuration through which it can be achieved or not. But you can use Badi TRIP_WEB_CHECK for WebDynpro.
Hope this will help.
Thanks & regards
Arun

EREC : Lock SAP user ID for future date

Hi ,
Can anyone suggest a way to Lock an SAP user id for a Future Date .
Thanks in advance,
Tk

Hi,
Instead of locking you can better delimit so that you can have a history for audit reasons.
i dont find business requirement for locking user.
thanks
rafi

Showing the Apple Pay button for future dates

I have a somewhat peculiar use case where the Apple Pay button may need to be shown when it is technically usable, but application validation would disallow it's usage.
Apple Pay is meant to be for instant purchases. In my case, a user may select the Apple Pay option, and then after the fact try and change the date of payment to some future date. We would throw an alert if the button was tapped to disallow an attempt at payment if the wrong date is selected.
It seems like this behavior would go against:
1. Do not use the Apple Pay payment button to invoke other views.
2. The payment button must always invoke the Apple Pay payment sheet.
3. Don’t display any Apple Pay UI if a user can’t use Apple Pay.
# 3 seems like the big one here.

hi
... i have a similar problem
but just with the sleep botton.
fist use your adapter with other iphone/itouch ... is posible itś the problem
second .. let your phone charging
...normally if we conect our phone ... after some minuts it's put on.
after 2 hours ... trate to use it ... if after it your phone continue same... could be qaa electrical/physic problem
please if you have a guaranty use it.
im sorry but my english is terrible.

Invoices posted for future dates could not shown in Outgoing Payment table

Hi, Experts,
We posted an A/P invoice for the future date (next month), and then we'd like to pay it under Banking -> Outgoing Payment -> Outgoing Payment the current date. But when we selected the vendor account, we could not find the invoice listed in the table.
Would this be anyway to show all the invoices posted with a future post date in the outgoing payment table?
Thanks!
Lorrie

Hi,
As it seems to be the current behavior of the system, the best option could be Payment on Account.
You can create a Payment on Account for payment on currenct date and when the AP Invoice is added you can Link the same to the Invoice afterwards.
Look out for other options if provided here by the experts.
Regards,
Jitin

RE_RHAKTI00 for future date

Hi,
Please tell me how can I activate the position through the report RE_RHAKTI00 with effect from future date.
Ritu

http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/spry/samples/validationwidgets/TextfieldValidationSampl e.html
^ there u go that would probly solve your problems

Stock confiramtion at sales order level for future date- Availability Check

Hi all
Here is the scenario
This setting is available in the system:
Stock is available
Sales order created with Requested delivery date in future-> not confirmed
Sales order created with Requested del date today -> confirmed
The requirement :
how and where to change this setting in IMG so that also orders with Requested Delivery Date in future are confirmed if stock is available.
As this is urgent request to respond quickly.
Regards
Devender

Hello Devender,
You can achieve the mentioned scenario by configuring ATP. You can do ATP with RLT or ATP without RLT.
In ATP with RLT, system will check and confirm the quantities from existing stock only and if quantities are insufficient then the system will consider inline POs or manufacturing time to confirm remaining quantitites.
Else you will be getting schedule lines for only items in stock and remaining will be unconfirmed as ATP without RLT will be activated i.e., system will check and confirm the quantities from existing stock only.
Types of Availability Check in Sales and Distribution
Processing
There are three types of availability check:
_ Check on the basis of the ATP quantities
_ Check against product allocation
_ Check against planning
The following SD-specific control features need to be maintained in Customizing:
_ Checking group
The checking group controls whether the system is to create individual or collective
requirements in sales and shipping processing. In addition, a material block for the
availability check with transfer of requirements can be set here. The checking group can
also be used to deactivate the availability check. This option was created especially for
the assembly order so that when the bill of material is exploded in the assembly order,
the individual components, if necessary, can be classified as non-critical parts as far as
procurement is concerned.
The checking group specifies in combination with the checking rule the scope of the
availability check. It is proposed in the material master record on the basis of the material
type and the plant, and copied into the sales and distribution documents.
_ Checking Rule
You use the checking rule to control the scope of the availability check for each
transaction in sales and distribution. You also specify whether the check should be
carried out including or excluding replenishment lead time. The individual checking rules
define by transaction, which stock and inward and outward movement of goods should
be taken into account for the availability check.
_ Schedule line category
You can control with the schedule line category whether an availability check and
transfer of requirements should be carried out in the sales documents. The possible
settings for this at schedule line level are dependent on the settings in the requirements
class which is determined from the requirements type of the material.
_ Delivery item category
The delivery item category can be used to control whether an availability check takes
place in deliveries.
Requirements type
The various requirements are identified by their requirements type. The requirements
type refers to the requirements class and its control features.
_ Requirements Class
The requirements class contains all control features for planning such as relevance for
planning, requirements planning strategy and requirements consumption strategy. In
addition, it is specified at a global level whether an availability check is to take place for
the material in the sales and distribution documents on the basis of the ATP quantity
(ATP = available to promise) and whether requirements are to be passed on. A finer
degree of control can be obtained for sales documents using the schedule line category.
Replenishment lead time is only included in the check performed on the basis of the
ATP quantity.
Prerequisites
An availability check can only be carried out if the following prerequisites have been fulfilled:
_ The control elements described above for the availability check must be maintained in
Customizing for Sales and the relevant assignments made to the sales transactions
_ The availability check must be switched on at requirements class level and - for the
availability check in the sales documents - at schedule line category level
A requirements type must exist by which the requirements class can be found
_ A plant must be defined. It can either be proposed from the customer or material master
record or can be entered manually in the document.
_ A checking group must be defined in the material master record on the Sales/plant data
screen in the Availability check field
Configuring entries of the Availability Check
IMGSDBasic fncsAvailability check and TORAvailability checkAvailability check with ATP logic or against planningDefine checking groups
You can use SAP std checking groups of 01 for summarized reqts or 02 for daily reqts or u can create ur own.
The columns total sales and total deliveries are selection options whereby u can configure a checking rule to sum up reqts to post to MRP either individually or by day or week.
Column 5, Block qty; set this block if u want several users to be able to process the material simultaneously in different transactions without blocking each other. The No Check indicator is used when u want a material to not be relevant for an ATP check.
Defining a material block for other users. The Block checkbox is an indicator that enables u to block the particular material from being checked for availability if it is already being checked at the same time by another user.
Defining the default value for checking groups. However should no entry exist for the checking group in the material master record, one can set a default value per material type and plant.
Controlling the availability check. In this section, u tell the system what stock on hand and what inward and outward movements of stock it must take into account when performing the availability check. These settings are based on the checking group that is assigned to the material master record and the checking rule that is predefined and assigned to the sd transaction. The carry out control for the availability check must be maintained for both the sales order and delivery.
Reward points if helpful.
Regards,
Priyanka

Weblogic portal content published for future date.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for