Weight Key in Vendor Evaluation

Hi all,
How the Weighting key in Vendor Evaluation is updating for Each Vendor?
If it is automatically Updating why ME6E is required?
regardds
Gibi Philip

hi,
Weighting Keys
A weighting key is an identifier under which the weighting factors for a number of main criteria can be grouped together and saved.
If you know that you will want to carry out an evaluation repeatedly with certain main criteria and certain weighting factors, you can save this combination under a weighting key.
When you carry out the next vendor evaluation, just enter the relevant weighting key instead of entering a weighting factor for each individual criterion. The system then automatically sets all the weighting factors.
There are two possible types of weighting key in the standard system:
Key 01
Key 02
Key 01 permits the equal weighting of all criteria.
Key 02 enables you to evaluate vendors supplying small parts, for example.
The weighting factors under this key are distributed as follows:
Price 5
Quality 3
Delivery 2
Gen. service/support 1
External service provision 2
Hope it explains you the importance ...
Regards
Priyanka.P
AWARD IF HELPFULL

Similar Messages

Mass Maintain weighting key for vendor evaluation.?

Hi experts
Can anybody give some inputs for below issue
1.How to maintain weighting key for vendors .
2.How to maintain weighting key for all vendors in mass .(Mass maintainence)
3.How to get the report of vendor ranking list duration wise (Month, year..etc).
Regards
MM group

weighting keys is customizing, and this is certainly not by vendor.
you define one weighting key and then you run vendor evaluation using this weighting key.

Weighting Key in Vendor Evaluation

Hi all,
Is there any configuration by which the weighting key is defaulted?
My client uses only one weighting key and whenever a vendor evaluation is run, they want the weighting key to be autopopulated.
FYI
No customization. Is this possible only through normal SAP configuration?
Thanks

Generally last time used weighting key will defult to ME61 but if not then you can create screen variant using SHD0 transaction.
Go to SHD0 adn type tcode ME61 and in tran variant type e.g. ZME61
and then hit create button
go through the transaction, every step popup will come
here just enter
and when you see the weighting key popup screen here check the w. content and output only check box (the value of weighting key should be populated)
then hit exit and save
it will ask object
enter the object and save
then from main screen
hit GOTO from header and click on create variant transaction and enter the variant transction code
e.g. ZME61 and save
give this to user
systen will defualt the weighting key
reward the points

Maintaining key in vendor evaluation for porg

how do i maintain weighting key for p org in vendor evaluation?? when i am trying to run vendor evaln for a vendor and porg...i get this msg saying no weighting ke assigned to this porg...plzz telll me abt the settings

thnx i already found it, but thanx for the prompt reply...could u plzz help me further by confirming if by default the weighting keys assigned is 02.??
regards

Weighting factor for Vendor evaluation

Hi gurus
we have configured evaluation like Quality-50%, Delivery-25%, quantity-25%
for all vendors it is picking the same criteria but donno for one vendor calculation criteria is picking like Quality-66.7% and Delivery-33.3% and Quantity-0%
What would be the reason and why this is happening for only one vendor.and how to come out of this
Thanks in Advance.

and the note said:
1. Question:
Why is my purchase order not considered when calculating a score for quantity reliability?
Answer:
Only closed purchase orders will be considered, as long as they fall within your given time range.
A purchase order is closed if:
the goods receipt quantity is greater than or equal the po quantity.
the delivery complete flag is set in the purchase order.

ME6G - Vendor Evaluation in Background

Dear Gurus,
Can explain me this transcation ME6G - Vendor Evaluation in Background . How to execute this by steps?
Please advice me
THanks
Rs

Dear,
You can evaluate your vendors on a regular basis by means of background processing. The Evaluation in the Background function can be found in the Purchasing menu.
If you want to start a background processing request for vendor evaluation, you need a variant (to limit the number of vendors to be evaluated, for example).
Maintaining and Displaying Variants
When you invoke the Evaluation in the Background function, you can display existing variants in editing mode of the step list, and create new variants or change existing ones.
To do so, choose Edit Steps and then
Goto Variant (to display), or
Goto Variant maintenance (to create)
Procedure
Choose Master data - Vendor evaluation.- Follow-on functions - Evaluation in the background.
On the initial screen, enter a job name and the name of the variant. Specify when the background evaluation should take place and how often it should be repeated.
Save the background processing request.
You require certain authorizations in order to carry out evaluations in the background and define new variants. If you have any queries in this connection, please consult your system administrator.
If you require more detailed information about working with background processing requests, please refer to the documentation Getting Started with R/3.
Subsequent Maintenance of Background Evaluations
In background processing, you usually evaluate vendors belonging to the same group (that is, vendors who have the same weighting key). However, it is possible that you have selected an interval that contains different groups of vendors. For this reason, you have not entered a weighting key.
To ensure that the scores are calculated correctly, you must therefore subsequently maintain the weighting key for such evaluation records at certain intervals of time.
The evaluation records in question can be determined using the analysis report Vendors Without Weighting Keys.
This function can be found in the purchasing menu under Master data - Vendor Evaluation - Follow-on functions - Vendors without weighting key
From this report you can branch directly into the screens for maintaining evaluations.
Regards,
Syed Hussain.

Equal weighting AND   Unequal weighting in Vendor Evaluation ?

Hi Experts,
Can u pls explain me this small issue with Vendor Evaluation weighting
SPRO - IMG - MM - PURCHASING - VENDOR EVALUATION - Maintain Purchasing Organization Data - SELECT PURCH .ORG -
DOUBLE CLICK ON Weighting - THERE IS I AM SEEING THIS LIST BELOW - Equal weighting AND   Unequal weighting
REPETING. my client wants vendor evaluation   Unequal . so i have to delet the Equal weighting 5 line or what to do ?
can u pls explain me.
01 Equal weighting 01 Price 1
01 Equal weighting 02 Quality 1
01 Equal weighting 03 fecha/cantidad 1
01 Equal weighting 04 Serviceservicio 1
01 Equal weighting 05 servicio 1
02 Unequal weighting 01 Price 1
02 Unequal weighting 02 Quality 1
02 Unequal weighting 03 fecha/cantidad 2
02 Unequal weighting 04 Serviceservicio 1
02 Unequal weighting 05 servicio 1
Thanksin Advance,
Anthyodaya.

Hi Priyanka,
thank you for the reply . but finalley my question is
my client wants Unequal weighting .
so i have to delete that Equal weighting lines or not .?
i mean line of below list .which is in BOLD letters. ?
01 Equal weighting 01 Price 1
01 Equal weighting 02 Quality 1
01 Equal weighting 03 fecha/cantidad 1
01 Equal weighting 04 Serviceservicio 1
01 Equal weighting 05 servicio 1
02 Unequal weighting 01 Price 1
02 Unequal weighting 02 Quality 1
02 Unequal weighting 03 fecha/cantidad 2
02 Unequal weighting 04 Serviceservicio 1
02 Unequal weighting 05 servicio 1
can u pls explain me.
Thanksin Advance,
Anthyodaya.

Confirmation date in vendor evaluation

Hi Gurus,
Can you please let me know the settings to be maintained to get a score for the sub criteria Adherence to confirmation date during vendor evaluations.
I've already maintained the purchasing org config settings like weighting and point scores for the automatic criteria.
But when I run a vendor evaluation there is no score coming out for the sub-criteria Adherence to confirmation date.
I'm using the confirmation control key One day acknowledge and confirmation category AB (Order acknowledge). Please let me know if anything is missing out
Regards,
Ashwin.

Ashwin
Our company has the same issue, did you find a solution to this problem?
Thanks
Brad

Vendor Evaluation in Background

Dear Gurus,
For vendor evaluation in Back ground, Do i need to maintain weight keys? then where can i see the output report once after running vendor evaluation in background.
Please advice
Thanks
RS

Dear,
Weighting Key is an identifier under which weighting factors for a number of main criteria can be grouped together and saved. If you know that you want to carry out an evaluation with certain main criteria and certain weighting factors, you can save this combination under a weighting key.
When you carry out the next vendor evaluation, just enter the relevant weighting key instead of entering a weighting factor for each individual criterion. The stardard two keys available are 01, 02.
If you do not have the weighting key, use the possible entries facility.
Next, in the background processing, usually evaluate vendors belonging to the same group (that is, vendors who have the weighting key). However, it is possible that you have selected an interval that contains different groups of vendors. For this reason, you may not enter a Weighting Key.
However the evaluation with weighting keys are preferred (basing on your organizations requirements and client performance, these may not be required). If you have enough time and interested to review the subject please have a look at: http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/EN/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf?bcsi_scan_DAD819A53026B58E=0&bcsi_scan_filename=MMISVE.pdf
Regards,
Syed Hussain.

Kindly suggest me regarding vendor evaluation (me63) score

Dear Friends,
I have excuted the report of vendor evaluation but here for Price criteria ( subcriteria) 40,40 are coming and some times it is 46,48 are coming. and for other criteria delivery it is 68,70 like that it is coming. kindly let me know how much is the maximum score for delivery,quality and price. and how it is distributed in standard when i have selected equal weightage
Regards,
Saurav

Dear Friend,
Kindly go through the below documents,
Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J. Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following weighting shares for the standard main criteria: Main criterion Key 01 Key 02 Price 1 5 Quality 1 5 Delivery 1 2 Gen. service/support 1 1 Ext. service provision 1 2 Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or automatically. You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose. Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL. An example :- How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria "On-Time Delivery Performance"? The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order (Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances. You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as September 15. In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative effect on the score for this goods receipt. However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30) which the vendor will actually adhere to. The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these are the movement types 101 and 105. Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time, but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage in Customizing. Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is not included in the calculation of the vendoru2019s score for on-time delivery performance. So that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in conjunction with quantity reliability. Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter. If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively low percentage variance: The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27; the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days. The system calculates the percentage variance as follows: 12 / 20 x 100 = 60 If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20% (12 / 60 x 100 = 20). If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm

Vendor Evaluation error

Hi,
During maintaining a vendor evaluation, I am getting the following error message:
"System settings for purchasing org 0001 incomplete".
I've maintained the following settings in Customizing:
1) Define weighting keys
2) Define criteria
3) Define scope list
4) Maintaining Purchasing Organization Data
Are there any other settings to be made somewhere?
Thanks for your help.

This is becuause some customising is not complete in 4)Maintaining Pur org data. Please go thro each step 1) Main creteria 2) Sub createria for each main creteria 3) Weighing key assignments ...
Regards
Mani

Vendor Evaluation with QM - Tables

Hello
Can any one help the table information such us vendor evaluation main criteria and sub-criteria. Information stored in the audit lot , rejections and complaints etc. Please i am looking for only Vendor Evaluation with QM - related Tables information only .
Thanks for your help
Nic

T147 - Control table for vendor evaluation
T147A - Definition for main criteria
T147B - Text for main criteria
T147C - Definition for sub-criteria
T147D - Text for sub-criteria
T147E - Definition of weighting keys
T147F - Description of weighting keys
T147G - Main criteria
T147H - Interval for delivery time statistics
T147I - Definition of sub-criteria for the main criteria
T147J - Weighting keys
T147K - Assignment: Percentage X Score
T147L - Intervals for quantity reliability
T147M - Definition of scope of list
T147N - Text for scope of list
T147O - Scope of List
T027A - is the table for defining shipping instructions
T027C - specifies the points scores for compliance

QM Settings for Vendor Evaluation

Hi All,
I am having a small issue with QM settings in Vendor Evaluation.
Actual Scenario - My client makes use of "Weighted Charateristics" instead of "Usage Decisions" and decides whether the material can be used or rejected etc at the time of Quality Inspection.
And, i believe that whatever the score or decision regarding the material was observed, it will be stored in a file with scores.
Now, the problem is Automatic Vendor Evaluation is simply giving a single score of 82 for whatever decision they make. Please try to address my following queries
1) Where the person responsible in QM needs to maintain the actual file with scores so that Vendor Evaluation can pick those scores for calculation?
2) Is there any configuration involved in either QM or Vendor Evaluation?
I came to know that all the configuration on the Vendor Evaluation side is OK
Thanks

In the MM side for QM criteria you have to make automatic only than rest will take by the QM module
see below
Complaints/Rejection Level
This subcriterion is used to evaluate whether the materials delivered by the vendor are regularly found to be faulty subsequent to incoming inspection (for example, on the shop-floor) leading to additional expense and loss of time (due to loss of production, reworking etc.).
The score (QM key quality figure) is calculated in QM Quality Management and the data passed on to MM Vendor Evaluation. This key quality figure is converted for use in the Vendor Evaluation scoring system.

Vendor Evaluation in MM

Hi All
Can u tell me the Detail process of Vendor Evaluation in MM
Regards
Manju

HI,
Vendor Evaluation for Purchasing
Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J.
Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following
weighting shares for the standard main criteria:
Main criterion Key 01 Key 02
Price 1 5
Quality 1 5
Delivery 1 2
Gen. service/support 1 1
Ext. service provision 1 2
Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items
In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and
specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or
automatically.
You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the
form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose.
Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items
Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL.
An example :-
How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria
"On-Time Delivery Performance"?
The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order
(Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances.
You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor
will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the
delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as
September 15.
In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use
the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative
effect on the score for this goods receipt.
However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30)
which the vendor will actually adhere to.
The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements
into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these
are the movement types 101 and 105.
Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time,
but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage
in Customizing.
Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on
time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is
not included in the calculation of the vendoru2019s score for on-time delivery performance. So
that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not
bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score
for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in
conjunction with quantity reliability.
Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter.
If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce
high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively
low percentage variance:
The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27;
the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days.
The system calculates the percentage variance as follows:
12 / 20 x 100 = 60
If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20%
(12 / 60 x 100 = 20).
If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via
the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the
statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
You can also refer http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/8d/b97e4f414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
Thanks & Regards,
Kiran

Vendor Evaluation With Non Standard Main and Sub Criteria

Hi Gurus
I have a requirement wherein I have to evaluate a vendor on non stanadard Main Criterias like
1. Productivity with sub criteria as Receipt / Excepected Yield, for which I have used Scoring method 2
2.Quality Standards with Sub Criteria,- Germination (%),Genitic Purity % , Field level flags, for which i have used scoring method 7 by activating user exit- MM06L001
3.Raw Seed to Clean Seed ratio, with the same sub criteria and with the above scoring method and user exit.
The weightages given to the above three are 40 , 35 and 25 respectively.
Can you please tell me how to calculate the values for subcriterias( for example for my main criteria 2. i want to assign the weightaghes for sub criterias - Germination - 50 , Genitic Purity %- 30, & Field level flags - 20, . along with smoothin factors.
I want to automise the whole process and run the evaluation in the background.
An early reply will be very helpful to me.
thanks and regards
Ashok Kumar Pitla

T147 - Control table for vendor evaluation
T147A - Definition for main criteria
T147B - Text for main criteria
T147C - Definition for sub-criteria
T147D - Text for sub-criteria
T147E - Definition of weighting keys
T147F - Description of weighting keys
T147G - Main criteria
T147H - Interval for delivery time statistics
T147I - Definition of sub-criteria for the main criteria
T147J - Weighting keys
T147K - Assignment: Percentage X Score
T147L - Intervals for quantity reliability
T147M - Definition of scope of list
T147N - Text for scope of list
T147O - Scope of List
T027A - is the table for defining shipping instructions
T027C - specifies the points scores for compliance

Weight Key in Vendor Evaluation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for