Weird issue with Exchange 2010 Room Mailboxes - allows multiple booking of the created meeting rooms

Hi,
we are facing weird issue with Exchange 2010 Room Mailboxes
it allows multiple booking of the created meeting rooms.Sometime we are not getting acceptance or declined mail but and we could see our meetings has been booked at slot.
for e.g.
User A booked room1 with weekly recurrence for time 4pm to 5pm., and User B made his booking other day,without realizing that user A meeting is exists.
Neither of user A nor user B got declined/rejected emails.
please sahre guidelines if anyone known to this issue.
Note - Allow Conflict booking is disabled already :) but still have issue
Thanks,
NPratik

Hi,
Just add more in this issue, following testing is done.
referring results and conclusion, you will get better view on issue
====================
Test Case - 1
User OnCloud/O365 - Pratik Nimbalkar
Email ID - [email protected]
( same as UPN)
Room Booking Scenario - Book Room for 6.30pm to 7.30pm slot
Results - Accepted
Room Booking Scenario for same slot- ReBook Room for 6.30pm to 7.30pm slot
Results - Declined
Conclusion = working fine
==================
Test Case - 2
User OnCloud/O365 - Testsm
Email ID - [email protected]
( different from UPN)
Room Booking Scenario - Rebook Room for 6.30pm to 7.30pm slot
Results - No Response from Room Mailbox neither Accepted nor Declined
But we can see as booked as "Tentative"
Room Booking Scenario for same slot- Rebook Room for 6.30pm to 7.30pm slot
Results -No Response from Room Mailbox neither Accepted nor Declined
But we can see as booked as "Tentative"
=========================
Conclusion = There is issue with booking room and not getting response while user is
@abc.my id.
======================
Note = for all other on premise users those are having @abc.co.in
and @abc.my it is working fine. Users are getting respective correct reply from room mailboxes.
This issue seems with only on cloud
@abc.my users

Similar Messages

Just updated to my macbook pro to 10.8.2. ical not synching with my Exchange 2010 server. Worked flawlessly prior to the upgrade. Settings set to auto discover. I matched settings of a partner in my who is still using 10.7.1 without issues. Help!

Just updated to my macbook pro to 10.8.2. ical not synching with my Exchange 2010 server. Worked flawlessly prior to the upgrade. Settings set to auto discover. I matched settings of a partner in my who is still using 10.7.1 without issues. Help!

Also - my battery has been telling me "service battery" for a LONG time and then it switched to "replace soon" som time ago. Can't really see what this has to do with anything but whatever.
That could conceivably explain all the problems you're describing. Replacing a Mac's battery should not be postponed since a failed battery will cause other problems to occur. It is also possible that its hard disk has failed, which means the information on it may soon become unrecoverable.
... my latest TM back up was from April 2014, can I just run this when I have rescued everthing and then it might not be as slow?
If that Time Machine backup remains intact, it may be the only viable means of recovering that Mac's information. I suggest you do not attempt to restore its contents to your ailing Mac.
Given that you are having trouble creating a newer Time Machine backup you should stop using that Mac immediately and have it serviced as soon as you are able. Do not take it to anyone other than Apple or a service facility authorized by Apple, for the very reasons you explained. If there are no Apple Stores in your vicinity search for an Authorized Apple Service Provider using the Contact Us link below. Use one of the options that appear under Contact Apple Support. The language on that page will be different for your location.

Exchange 2013 DLP with Exchange 2010 mailboxes

Ive got an Exchange 2007/2010 environment. I've been looking at Exchange 2013 and am interested in the DLP funtionality.
There are no plans to move mailboxes to Exchange 2013 but would it be possible to install an Exchange 2013 CAS/Mailbox server in my environment and route email through it to make use of the DLP ?
Current environment consists of Exchange 2010 DAG, Casarray and hub transport servers, and Exchange 2007 mailbox servers, CAS and hub transports. Mail to the internet is sent to a smarthost.
Thank you.

Hi Maria,
DLP Policies are actually a specific transport rule. Since the transport rules with Exchange 2010 didn’t provide such feature to monitor and check the e-mail
content, I am afraid, in theory, it’s not possible.
Thanks,
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Simon Wu
TechNet Community Support

Exchange 2010 resource mailbox double booking issue..

Hi,
I have moved the meeting room mailbox from exchange 2003 to 2010:
set-Mailbox -Identity:<resourcename> -Type:Room
but after that, the meeting room can be double booking in the same time.
I have tried folllowing command, but it's failded.
Set-CalendarProcessing -Identity <mailbox identity> -AllowConflicts:$false
Thanks.

Hi Martina,
I appreciate this is an old post, however if you do pick up on this could you please advise on your statement from the above:
"Even if the room sends a Decline, as it should when a conflict is found, you will still see that meeting request in your own Calendar."
This is the exact behaviour happening at a customer of ours at the moment. However they don't want the meeting requests to appear/remain in the Calendar of the person trying to book the meeting room.
Do you know of a way to stop this behaviour?
Do you know if the meeting request is only populated in the Calendar of the user who tries to book an appointment in the resource calendar or does this appear in other perspective attendees Calendars?
Many Thanks,
Matt.
MEllis

Sync issue with Outlook 2010

Hi,
Not sure if this would be the correct place for this, but here is my issue
We have a client with Exchange 2010, and Outlook 2010 and they seem to be getting sync issues. the error that comes up is
10:58:52 Synchronizer Version 14.0.6117
10:58:52 Synchronizing Mailbox "User Mailbox"
10:58:52 Synchronizing local changes in folder 'Inbox'
10:58:52 Uploading to server "server.domain"
10:58:52 Synchronization of some deletions failed.
10:58:52                  [0-130]
10:58:52            2 item(s) deleted in online folder
10:58:52 Done
And here is another example
10:27:20 Synchronizer Version 14.0.6117
10:27:20 Synchronizing Mailbox "User Mailbox"
10:27:20 Synchronizing Hierarchy
10:27:20 Synchronizing local changes in folder 'move folder'
10:27:20 Uploading to server "Server.domain"
10:27:20 Synchronization of some deletions failed.
10:27:20                  [0-130]
10:27:21            3 item(s) added to online folder
10:27:21            3 item(s) deleted in online folder
10:27:21 Synchronizing local changes in folder 'move folder 2'
10:27:21 Uploading to server
"Server.domain"
10:27:21            4 item(s) added to online folder
10:27:21 Downloading from server
"Server.domain"
10:27:21 Done
10:27:25 Microsoft Exchange offline address book
10:27:25 Download successful
Now I have tried some of the standard troubleshooting steps but it seems to keep happening.
This is what I have tried
1) turned off any 3rd part addins
2) turned on outlook logging, but it does not seem to indicate any errors, or I may not be reading it right
3) removed the ost file, and let outlook recreate it
4) turned off cache mode, and turned off offline file, re-open outlook turned back on offline file, cache mode
5) removed exchange support files for outlook, and repaired office
So I am not sure where to proceed from here.
Thanks
Tim

Hello Tim,
Is there any new update on this thread?
Thanks,
Simon
Exchange Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]

Edge 2013 sp1 with exchange 2010 organisation.

Dear reader,
I have an exchange 2010 sp3 organisation with 1 client access server with hub transport and a 2 node DAG. Can I install a stand alone exchange 2013sp1 Edge role on a seperate machine in DMZ and subscribe the exchange 2010 hub transport to it. This
in preparation to move to exchange 2013sp1 later this year. The current exchange 2010 edge role is installed on a TMG 2010 machine. Since TMG 2010 is dropped and we also have issues with the current edge's mailflow, i'd like to have a dedicated Exchange edge.
Best regards,
Ruud Boersma
MCITP Enterprise administrator

Sure, You can install Edge of Exchange 2013 on a dedicated server in DMZ and subscribe with Exchange 2010 Transport server.
Or you can allow the Existing Exchange 2010 Edge server to serve your internet mail flow till the time you implement Exchange 2013 in the environment. I would suggest Exchange 2013 CU5 as a lot of issues were fixed in that which were identified with Exchange
2013 SP1.

Outlook 2013 with Exchange 2010

we upgraded from Outlook 2010 to 2013 x64it and the exchange server is the same 2010
when trying to cleanup public folders the Clean Up tool is grayed our and it says "outlook 2013 this feature is not available because you are running in online mode and connected to microsoft exchange server 2007 or earlier" none of this is true.
It works fine when you are in your own inbox, only grays out in Public folders, this worked fine with Outlook 2010
David

Hi David,
Sorry for the late reply.
Since Outlook 2010 works well, just Outlook 2013 has this issue, I still believe this issue related to the Outlook 2013 Client side.
I suggest also create a thread on Outlook Forum so that we can get more professional suggestions.
For your convenience:
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/office/en-US/home?forum=outlook
If this issue really related to the Exchange 2010 server side, I suggest re-setting the default public folder database for testing.
Please make a back up for the current setting in case of some crash. If it doesn't work, please back to the current setting.
Then please follow following article to change the default public folder database:
Change the Default Public Folder Database for a Mailbox Database
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb629522.aspx
Thanks
Mavis
Mavis Huang
TechNet Community Support

Exchange 2013 CAS functionality in coexistence with Exchange 2010 CAS

Hi,
I am planning to migrate Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2013 for 15000 users. We have a pool of 6 CAS 2010 servers added in a single CAS array. So my question is if we introduce a new CAS 2013 server in same site then will it affect CAS traffic anyway ? If we
point our HLB to all CAS servers including CAS 2010 and CAS 2013 so will the CAS 2010 servers wil take traffic or is it only CAS 2013 servers who will take traffic. We will be putting same URLs in CAS 2013 same as CAS 2010. I have read lot of MS articles and
all say that CAS 2013 should be enabled for CAS traffic and it will proxy request to CAS 2010. But I am not sure if we will face any CAS traffic issue whenever we will introduce CAS 2013 servers in same site and traffic will be pointed to CAS 2010 and CAS
2013 both. Is it possible to add CAS 2013 in Exchange 2010 CAS array ? Please guide. Thanks in advance.

For mailbox that exist on Exchange 2010, EXCH2013 CAS will proxy the request to an Exchange 2010 Client Access servers that exists within the mailbox’s local site.
For mailboxes that exist on Exchange 2013, EXCH2013 CAS will proxy the request to the Exchange 2013 Mailbox server that is hosting the active copy of the user’s mailbox which will generate the Autodiscover response.
-->Is it possible to add CAS 2013 in Exchange 2010 CAS array ?
No. CAS Array is no longer exits in Exchange 2013. But concept of a single namespace for Outlook connectivity remains. Please check this and this. In
your case you dont need to worry as you have a HLB in place it will do the job
When a new exchange2013 is deployed Outlook Anywhere has been enabled on all Client Access servers within the infrastructure and the mail.contoso.com and autodiscover.contoso.com namespaces have been moved to resolve to Exchange 2013 Client Access server
infrastructure. In your case it is pointed to both as you have a load balancer in place but the same URL should be configured in exch2013
Make sure you have exchange2010-SP3 minimum as it is the prerequisite requirement for upgarding EXCh2010 to 2013.
Please check the exchange server deployment assistant
tool for moving mailboxes
After moving a mailbox check the URLs. Configure autodiscover,EWS,OAB URLs on exchange2013. Please check this as
well for checking URLs.
I hope you know MAPI/RPC (RPC over TCP) traffic is now replaced with RPC over HTTP/s instead in exch2013.
Thanks
MAS
Please don't forget to mark an answer if it answers your question or mark as helpful if it helps

Installing SQL 2012 BI on a server with Exchange 2010

I would like to create a new SBS-type network ... and I know that SBS2011 is dead, so I am looking at moving into the new Server 2012 world. I understand that Server 2012 Essentials has some really nice management and remote-access capabilities.
I definitely want to install Exchange 2010 on-premises and I know that it cannot be installed on Server 2012 Essentials, so I will have to deploy a second server running Server 2012 Standard. Not thrilled, but I can live with that (I miss SBS already).
I am also interested in installing SQL Server 2012 BI because I understand my POS (Point-Of-Sale) vendor should release a new SQL-based option in 2013 and I want to anticipate that and be ready.
I should have 15-17 users on this network without heavy use - mostly file + print sharing along with Exchange-based email. I do understand that Exchange takes up a lot of RAM, which is potentially a conflict with SQL Server, but I can put
8-12GB into each box. (Each box has two dual-core 2GHz AMD cpu's.)
So, my questions are:
Where should I best install SQL2012 BI?
Can Exchange 2010 and SQL 2012 BI live on the same box? If so, are there any tuning/install recommendations?
As you can see, I'm a newbie to the 2012 world and I appreciate any advice / pointers you can give.
Thanks!

Hello,
Please see the following article:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa997379(v=EXCHG.80).aspx
“Running SQL Server on the same computer as a production Exchange mailbox server is not recommended. Both SQL Server and Exchange mailbox servers consume a large amount of memory and disk resources to operate optimally. Co-hosting SQL Server and Exchange Server
on the same computer in a production environment will likely lead to poor performance by one or both of the servers. Additionally, troubleshooting and securing such an installation is not well understood.”
“Move either Exchange Server or SQL Server off the computer. Completely removing one of these programs from the computer is recommended”
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Alberto Morillo
SQLCoffee.com

Limitations of SharePoint 2013 integration with Exchange 2010?

Customer using SharePoint 2013 and looking at whether its possible to integrate this with Exchange 2010 and which features would be available / limitations. Looking for a matrix similar to those found in the Good, Better, Best documents available for previous
versions. Nothing available on Recently Published content for SharePoint 2013 yet http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc262043.aspx

I haven't seen a specific list, but the three features I've run into that only work with Exchange 2013 are eDiscovery in Exchange, Automatic Task Synchronization with Outlook and the Site Mailbox feature. There is a Legacy Task Synchronization mode
available that will work with Exchange 2010 if you turn off the Farm level feature controlling Exchange 2013 task synchronization. It lets users manually sync specific task lists with Outlook. But there is no task aggregation. I found this
whitepaper helpful for exploring the new features and how to turn them off when using Exchange 2010.
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=38799
Paul Stork SharePoint Server MVP
Principal Architect: Blue Chip Consulting Group
Blog: http://dontpapanic.com/blog
Twitter: Follow @pstork
Please remember to mark your question as "answered" if this solves your problem.

Exchange 2013 Sp1 Coexistence with Exchange 2010 SP3 CU5 HTTP 500

I`m trying to make working OWA coexistence between Exchange 2013 SP1 and Exchange 2010 SP3 CU5.
When user login in to OWA where his mailbox is located on Exchange 2013 server it logon successful and owa opened. When i try to login to the same url with user whose mailbox is located on Exchange 2010 server i get Error http 50
The website cannot display the page : HTTP 500 »https://URLEXCHANGE2013/owa/auth.owa«
The same is, when i use https:// URLEXCHANGE2013/ecp?ExchClientVer=14
URL on Exchange 2013 are different as fro Exchange 2010.
I even tried to setup Internal URL for Exchange 2010 to bi set to »null ,Saem error
Exchange server 2013 Sp1 is installed on Windows server 2012 R2.

Assumption is correct. I have even enable verbose logging, and i can see MSExchange Front End HTTP Proxy , that successfully connect to Exchange 2010 server.
But remember Exchange 2013 is fresh installation on Windows server 2012 R2.
IIS LOG
2014-03-04 08:52:53 fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll [email protected]:6001&CorrelationID=<empty>;&RequestId=391fd8b3-2b98-494a-8812-d38feda2e5a0&cafeReqId=391fd8b3-2b98-494a-8812-d38feda2e5a0;
443 companyNT\SM_9c071c4922fd420fb fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 MSRPC - 200 0 0 5484
2014-03-04 08:52:53 fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll [email protected]:6001&CorrelationID=<empty>;&RequestId=27cfafa2-8224-4563-918b-0b228c6ee8d4&cafeReqId=27cfafa2-8224-4563-918b-0b228c6ee8d4;
443 - fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 MSRPC - 401 1 2148074254 0
2014-03-04 08:52:53 fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 RPC_OUT_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll [email protected]:6001&CorrelationID=<empty>;&RequestId=6d930bcd-7bbc-415a-a25a-8d6488e91401&cafeReqId=6d930bcd-7bbc-415a-a25a-8d6488e91401;
443 - fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 MSRPC - 401 1 2148074254 15
2014-03-04 08:52:55 10.1.0.36 GET /owa/ &CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=551cfdd9-18ac-42d8-aea3-cbb546c9d9fb; 443 - 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+7.0;+Windows+NT+6.3;+WOW64;+Trident/7.0;+.NET4.0E;+.NET4.0C) https://OWA.company.com/
302 0 0 9937
2014-03-04 08:52:56 10.1.0.36 GET /owa/auth/logon.aspx url=https%3a%2f%2fOWA.company.com%2fowa%2f&reason=0&CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=c1b97df9-ec56-4906-b2f5-965551b720ae; 443 - 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+7.0;+Windows+NT+6.3;+WOW64;+Trident/7.0;+.NET4.0E;+.NET4.0C)
https://OWA.company.com/ 200 0 0 1015
2014-03-04 08:52:56 10.1.0.36 GET /owa/auth/logon.aspx replaceCurrent=1&url=https%3a%2f%2fOWA.company.com%2fowa%2f&CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=b92ca682-04f4-4d4f-931e-9a95680ab9ea; 443 - 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+7.0;+Windows+NT+6.3;+WOW64;+Trident/7.0;+.NET4.0E;+.NET4.0C)
- 200 0 0 671
2014-03-04 08:52:58 10.1.0.36 GET /ecp/ &CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=093bd01a-de59-4519-80f6-067484122091; 443 - 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+9.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+MSEXCHMON;+ACTIVEMONITORING) - 302 0 0 0
2014-03-04 08:52:58 10.1.0.36 GET /owa/auth/logon.aspx url=https%3a%2f%2fEXCH2013%2fecp%2f&reason=0&CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=c2f7565d-ee6a-48f8-8d86-16d5d3ca65c1; 443 - 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+9.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+MSEXCHMON;+ACTIVEMONITORING)
- 200 0 0 0
2014-03-04 08:52:58 10.1.0.36 GET /ecp/ &CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=ba633030-2376-4bad-a32f-8f160bd87bd4; 443 - 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+9.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+MSEXCHMON;+ACTIVEMONITORING) - 302 0 0 0
2014-03-04 08:52:58 10.1.0.36 GET /owa/auth/logon.aspx url=https%3a%2f%2fEXCH2013%2fecp%2f&reason=0&CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=5e94172c-d97c-46a9-a602-6030d6f7da2c; 443 - 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+9.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+MSEXCHMON;+ACTIVEMONITORING)
- 200 0 0 0
2014-03-04 08:52:58 10.1.0.36 GET /owa/auth/logon.aspx replaceCurrent=1&url=https%3a%2f%2fEXCH2013%2fecp%2f&CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=9ba2caf3-2a03-44a2-8477-2724689e139c; 443 - 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+9.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+MSEXCHMON;+ACTIVEMONITORING)
- 200 0 0 46
2014-03-04 08:52:58 10.1.0.36 GET /owa/auth/15.0.847/scripts/premium/flogon.js &CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=62bb4655-3bfa-4e07-aa62-27c93e7e8b4d; 443 - 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+9.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+MSEXCHMON;+ACTIVEMONITORING)
- 200 0 0 0
2014-03-04 08:52:59 10.1.0.36 POST /owa/auth.owa &CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=9d52ec1a-2ee1-4954-85e6-89e7e5df407a; 443 [email protected] 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+9.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+MSEXCHMON;+ACTIVEMONITORING)
- 302 0 0 812
2014-03-04 08:52:59 ::1 GET /OWA/Calendar/[email protected]/calendar/calendar.html &CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=4ea66475-9a47-41a4-81cb-6b569715d0d6; 443 - ::1 AMProbe/Local/ClientAccess - 200 0 0 8859
2014-03-04 08:53:01 10.1.0.36 POST /owa/auth.owa &CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=b3db7480-2192-436c-b01d-29d0e528cfec; 443 UseronEX2010 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+7.0;+Windows+NT+6.3;+WOW64;+Trident/7.0;+.NET4.0E;+.NET4.0C) https://OWA.company.com/owa/auth/logon.aspx?replaceCurrent=1&url=https%3a%2f%2fOWA.company.com%2fowa%2f
500 0 0 187
2014-03-04 08:53:04 127.0.0.1 GET /Microsoft-Server-ActiveSync/default.eas &CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=2e2a655b-00b9-42ae-8789-1e452e6579c3; 443 [email protected] 127.0.0.1 AMProbe/Local/ClientAccess
- 200 0 0 8265
2014-03-04 08:53:14 10.1.0.36 GET /ecp/ &CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=8741886f-b9b1-46f9-8c15-baf35809a12c; 443 [email protected] 10.1.0.36 Mozilla/4.0+(compatible;+MSIE+9.0;+Windows+NT+6.1;+MSEXCHMON;+ACTIVEMONITORING)
- 200 0 0 15265
2014-03-04 08:53:14 127.0.0.1 GET /OWA/auth.owa &CorrelationID=<empty>;&cafeReqId=8ad938fb-f2c3-42bf-8718-da62b122422c; 443 - 127.0.0.1 AMProbe/Local/ClientAccess - 302 0 0 15
HTTPERR LOG :
2014-03-04 08:51:48 10.1.0.36 13937 10.1.0.36 444 HTTP/1.1 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll?EXCH2013.companyNT.local:6001 400 2 BadRequest MSExchangeRpcProxyAppPool
2014-03-04 08:51:48 fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 13872 fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 444 HTTP/1.1 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll?EXCH2013.companyNT.local:6001 400 2 BadRequest MSExchangeRpcProxyAppPool
2014-03-04 08:52:25 10.1.0.36 13937 10.1.0.36 444 HTTP/1.1 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll?EXCH2013.companyNT.local:6001 400 2 Connection_Dropped MSExchangeRpcProxyAppPool
2014-03-04 08:52:25 fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 13872 fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 444 HTTP/1.1 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll?EXCH2013.companyNT.local:6001 400 2 Connection_Dropped MSExchangeRpcProxyAppPool
2014-03-04 08:52:30 127.0.0.1 14122 127.0.0.1 443 HTTP/1.1 GET /RPC/[email protected] 404 - NotFound -
2014-03-04 08:52:30 ::1%0 14121 ::1%0 443 HTTP/1.1 GET /ecp/ReportingWebService/ 404 - NotFound -
2014-03-04 08:54:42 ::1%0 14117 ::1%0 444 - - - - - Timer_ConnectionIdle -
2014-03-04 08:54:48 10.1.0.36 14211 10.1.0.36 444 HTTP/1.1 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll?EXCH2013.companyNT.local:6001 400 2 BadRequest MSExchangeRpcProxyAppPool
2014-03-04 08:54:48 fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 14285 fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 444 HTTP/1.1 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll?EXCH2013.companyNT.local:6001 400 2 BadRequest MSExchangeRpcProxyAppPool
2014-03-04 08:55:35 10.1.0.36 14211 10.1.0.36 444 HTTP/1.1 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll?EXCH2013.companyNT.local:6001 400 2 Connection_Dropped MSExchangeRpcProxyAppPool
2014-03-04 08:55:35 fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 14285 fe80::99d1:f542:a4d3:b469%12 444 HTTP/1.1 RPC_IN_DATA /rpc/rpcproxy.dll?EXCH2013.companyNT.local:6001 400 2 Connection_Dropped MSExchangeRpcProxyAppPool
Trace login, ok it is xml, so print is..
-Request Summary
Site
1
Process
8232
Failure Reason
STATUS_CODE
Trigger Status
500
Final Status
500
Time Taken
500 msec
Url
http://EXCH2013.companyNT.local:80/powershell?clientApplication=ActiveMonitor;PSVersion=4.0&sessionID=Version_15.0_(Build_846.0)=rJqNiZqNgZuQkpqT0pqH0ZuQkpqTkYvRk5CcnpOBzsbLzsbGyczJyIHPzNDPy9DNz87L38/Gxc/KxcrJ
App Pool
MSExchangePowerShellFrontEndAppPool
Authentication
Kerberos
User from token
companyNT\SM_9c071c4922fd420fb
Activity ID
{8000134C-0001-E300-B63F-84710C7967BB}
-Errors & Warnings
No.↓
Severity
Event
Module Name
157. view trace
Warning
-MODULE_SET_RESPONSE_ERROR_STATUS
ModuleName
ManagedPipelineHandler
Notification
EXECUTE_REQUEST_HANDLER
HttpStatus
500
HttpReason
Request Failed
HttpSubStatus
0
ErrorCode
The operation completed successfully.
(0x0)
ConfigExceptionInfo
ManagedPipelineHandler
See all events for the request

Outlook 2010 Profiles Not Creating with Exchange 2010 Backend

In an enterprise environment. Issue has been replicated on multiple Windows Terminal Servers, with multiple accounts.
With multiple accounts have recreated the user profiles from scratch, and launched outlook 2010. The profile does not autocreate, it was working in production about a week ago. Windows Updates were applied for December 2014.
Does anyone know if a Local Windows Client side patch would cause Outlook 2010 not to resolve a profile correctly. Could this be the outlook mapi rpc issue that was part of RU8. Have searched several hundred artciles on this on google and twitter
in the last weeks time frame and cannot find anywhere online that lists excatly what a user experiences when RU8 fails. Have not heard back from the Exchange administrator if RU8 was deployed. There are also multiple Windows Updates for December
2014 for Office that may have caused the problem.
Might be having exactly the same issue as this guy.
http://exchangetips.us/2014/12/exchange-users-unable-to-connect-with-outlook-2010/
Microsoft did pull/release a version #2 of an exchange patch in December which might be the root cause.
https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2014/12/12/microsoft-pulls-patch-tuesday-fix-outlook-cant-connect-to-exchange/
not sure if we are we running “Exchange Server 2010 SP3 Update Rollup 8”
–version #1 or version #2
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2014/12/09/exchange-releases-december-2014.aspx
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/1f77b07b-8330-453c-bc4e-4322d21d1aa3/outlook-error-code-0x800040050x800040050x000501?forum=exchangesvrclientslegacy
http://www.anywherexchange.com/2014/12/mapi-http-support-now-available-for.html
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2014/05/09/outlook-connectivity-with-mapi-over-http.aspx
http://windowsitpro.com/blog/exchange-2010-sp3-ru8-withdrawn-due-bug-mapi-rpc-layer
http://www.reddit.com/r/sysadmin/comments/2oxfdf/microsoft_exchange_2010_sp3_ru8_breaks_outlook/?utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=twitterfeed
http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2014/12/09/exchange-releases-december-2014.aspx
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/1be9b816-b0ab-40ea-a43a-446239f8eae3/outlook-client-issues-following-exchange-2010-rollup-8?forum=exchange2010
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/8a66406b-2047-4108-bd5a-9a178114c424/exchange-2010-sp3-rollup-8-and-rollup-7?forum=smallbusinessserver2011essentials

There are known issues with Outlook connections if you are using Exchange 2010 SP3 UR8 (as you have found). You can check which update you are running by going to
Control Panel/Uninstall a Program, then click the
View Installed Updates selection (upper left). Your
Exchange Server 2010 - Software Updates will show a definite difference between UR8 and UR8V2. To be safe, I'd fully remove UR8 and install UR8V2 after a system restart.

TS4532 Any idea on the timing of the software update to fix the IOS6.1 problems with Exchange 2010?

Any idea on the timing of the SW update to fix the IOS 6.1 problem with Exchange 2010?
victor

In reply to Macca7275
We moved from Blackberry to iPhone for 120 services in 2010. We have just renewed the iPhone fleet. Security was the issue for the business that employs me (lawyers). When comparing the two, Blackberry performed without issue most of the time but we experienced a number of issues with the trackballs on individual phones. This was, however, the first of the Blackberry Bold models. The expense behind the scenes was one of the major factors for the move. It was cheaper to run Exchange and iPhones than Blackberry services. Our lawyers on the whole adopted the iPhones and a number have become quite proficient at using them. We ensured that we had a means to securely wipe and lock business phones. We chose Mobile Iron for this purpose but you will find other products to do the same job. Cost is probably going to be the deciding factor here. Our only negative factor was butterfingers resulting in smashed glass with the iPhones although I have had one user drown several phones.

Problem with Exchange 2010, Q10 and attachment

Q10 & Exchange 2010; unable to download and forward attachment
Hi all,
i have a problem with Q10 phone, sync with Exchange 2010 with activesync (not BES) all seem ok but unable to download attach.
When press "download" didnt start. Unable also to forward same message but i think is a chainde problem.
Same message from desktop (outlook) or OWA is ok and attach downloadable.
This is the only Q10 present in company for test so i cannot compare to others BB.
All other users connected to the exchaneg server have iphone & ipad no issue result. Email service seem ok also for desktop.
Firmware was updateted about 10 day ago.
Any idea for me?
Thanks

Hi marcottt,
Could you provide more detail please so I can better assist?
Do you have this issue with all attachment types? If not, what type of attachment are you having this issue with and what size is the attachment?
What happens when you try to forward the message? Is any error received?
Does removing and re-adding the email account make any difference?
I look forward to your response.
-FS
Come follow your BlackBerry Technical Team on Twitter! @BlackBerryHelp
Be sure to click Kudos! for those who have helped you.
Click Solution? for posts that have solved your issue(s)!

Mailbox Permissions Exchange 2010 forcing mailbox on outlook profile.

Hi,
We currently have a user that uses outlook 2010, along with exchange 2010. He currently uses two mail profiles on his outlook.
Profile 1 & Profile 2.
Profile 1 consists of his primary inbox. Profile 2 consists of a few shared mailboxes, along with 3 staff members.
When we add full permissions to the user to another 3 mailboxes 2010 makes this automatically appear for the user, casuing it to show on profile 1. Is there a way to stop this auto mapping and only add them to the second mailbox?
Thanks

Hi,
We can use the “-Automapping” switch in the following command:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh529943(v=exchg.141).aspx
Thanks,
Simon Wu
TechNet Community Support

Weird issue with Exchange 2010 Room Mailboxes - allows multiple booking of the created meeting rooms

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for