What are the Advantages & Disadvantages in Material Ledger?

Hi Experts,
What are the Advantages & Disadvantages in Material Ledger?
Is it there any problem if you run CKMLCP next period 10th day?
What is the criticality in ML as well as why all are very fearful to implement it?
Thanks
Bhagirath

Hi,
One cannot speak of 'disadvantage' in this case... If you activate material ledger, you acieve different valuation logic of the prices in the procurement process. Please, consult composite note 532932 for further info. The intimidation of activation is a result of numerous 'bugs' in previous SAP releases regarding the material ledger documents. Most of these 'bugs' are fixed, but the fear remains
Regards,
Eli

Similar Messages

  • What are the advantages/disadvantages of using PS/CS5 in 64bit over 32bit please?

    What are the advantages/disadvantages of using PS/CS5 in 64bit over 32bit please?

    From a practical perspective, besides the 64 bit version being a bit faster at just about everything, limitations on document size are lifted in the 64 bit version.  Essentially, how much can do is limited only by how much RAM you have installed in your system.  You can do things like have larger documents, deeper history, etc. and have it all work quickly.
    On the other hand, many 3rd party plug-ins, especially older ones, only provide 32 bit versions, which will only run in 32 bit Photoshop.
    Both 32 and 64 bit versions are installed by default.  It's important to note that most of the preferences are separate between the two, so you can have two slightly different setups that might help with specialty operations you might need.  This gets pretty subtle, but for example I keep the 32 bit version configured with only 1 cache level, so all previews of high bit depth images are always composited in high bit depth.  This aids me with some aspects of astroimage processing.  It's slower, but more accurate.  By contrast I have more cache levels configured for my 64 bit version, so that's faster for general photography work.
    -Noel

  • Converting RAW to DNG! What are the advantages / disadvantages?

    I have Canon cameras and shoot RAW, but the question itself is surely also valid for Nikon, Sony or other brand-shooters.
    When importing my pictures to Lightroom, I could convert them to DNG but didn't do this up to now, because I do not know what I loose. I suppose that I loose the ability to process my files with DPP, but I will not do that anyhow. I can appreciate the advantage of having the file in an open documented format, where even I could easily write a reader for it. So the answer should not be what I can easily find in the Adobe introduction into DNG. I have also the DNG specification in front of me, and I can read it, because I once wrote a program to read TIFF files. I understand that I could add the original RAW image stream, but I do not want using up the space wasted for this. I know, that all development parameters used for the specific RAW image can be written with the image file instead of having those stored in a database or a side-car-file.
    But what I did not find until now a technical explanation about what happens during the convert. Who can enlighten me? Where do I find the missing technical explanations?
    Thanks in advance!
    Lucien.

    Feierwoon wrote:
    That wasn't the question... .
    Based on the title of the thread and your initial post, it seems like your question had a lot of
    "What are the advantages / disadvantages?"
    in it, and only a little
    "What happens at a technical level when converting"
    But if you want more detailed info about conversion, and you have the aptitude to understand, I recommend doing what Lr5user-pt recommended:
    Download the DNG SDK and dig in - all your questions will be answered (and if not, you can also ask DNG-specific technical questions in the DNG forum).
    As far as my "sources" regarding the technical summary I presented, they are many and varied, none of which are the DNG SDK. In other words, my knowledge is based more on experience over the years - I don't know all the details under the hood..
    Some experiments to consider doing:
    * exiftool (-X) a proprietary raw file, then convert to DNG and repeat.
    * open a proprietary raw in a DNG-supporting software of your choice and inspect metadata, then open the converted DNG in the same software and re-evaluate. Compare to proprietary raw opened in manufacturer's software, and what you see via exiftool.
    Tom Hogarty (Lightroom project manager) and others who know have said: "DNG converter discards no metadata", and I believe them, but haven't verified for myself. Yet once proprietary metadata is in the DNG, most (all?) software will no longer decode it. A prime example is focus points - presumably they're there, but once converted, focus point feature is no longer supported. The amount of work required to support converted focus point data is unknown (to me), but as far as I know, no software has ventured to do it. If you want focus points, don't convert.
    If you want the truth, I think for most people it's "not wise" to convert to DNG. Why? because unless you already know why you are converting (and need to convert to satisfy your goals), or you already know why you must NOT convert (e.g. so you can open the files in mfr.software, and see focus points..) the pros and cons are likely to be a wash, and now you have twice the number of raw files, unless you discard your originals, which would be REALLY "not wise", in my opinion. If you find the notion of "openly documented format" sufficiently compelling, then, ya know, more power to ya (I don't judge..), but there is no guarantee that DNG will outlast NEF (or..), and if it does, there will be ample opportunity to convert before you're left in the cold, unless you're stuck in a cave for a few decades, or are kryogenically frozen.. True, if all companies die, you may be able to write your own DNG converter (/reader), given the DNG documentation, but FWIW, NEF is also thoroughly documented (document is in freely downloadable SDK), and reverse engineerable (that's what Adobe and Phil Harvey does), so you could also write your own NEF converter, so not really a very compelling argument, not this year anyway - ask me again in a few decades..
    If filesize is a main draw, then be sure NOT to save the hi-rez previews in your DNGs, otherwise you've just lost most or all of the filesize advantage. Also, you can strip previews from some proprietary raws (e.g. NEFs), to reduce filesize.
    Personally, if DNG supported sidecars, I would be more likely to convert, because file-management/backup is only an issue if you "forget" about xmp sidecars (and I do not forget), and I'd rather have my xmp in separate ready-to-read xml text files, rather than embedded in binary files, but hey, that's me..
    PS - I always use/encourage-others-to-use DNG when distributing raws to others for use in Adobe software, so xmp is not separate and can not get lost.
    PPS - proprietary raws and dngs are both just glorified tiff files - raw data, previews, and metadata..
    Don't get me wrong: I am NOT anti-DNG, and in fact - just the opposite: I am PRO dng, it's just that I wouldn't (don't) convert my own raws to DNG at this point. If you find the reasons to convert now are sufficiently compelling, you have my complete support and cooperation, fwiw..
    Cheers,
    Rob

  • What are the Advantages & Disadvantages of Global Variable at Package Level

    Dear Expprts
    Please tell me,
    What is mean by Global Variable?
    What are the Advantages and Disadvantages of Global Variable at Package Level against Private Variable?

    HI
    GLOBAL VARIABLE UR USE ANY BLOCK IN PLSQL
    BUT LOCAL VARIABLE USED ONLY THERE THEY DECLARE.
    REGARDS
    MOHAMMADI

  • What are the advantages/disadvantages to "Save Media Cache files next to originals when possible?

    I just noticed that I have over 7,000 files and 46.7 GB in my Media Cache Files folder.  I know I can just delete all the files in this folder and Premiere will automatically rebuild the files when needed.  But, are there any advantages or disadvantages to saving the files next to the originals?  I assume that means that it will write these files wherever I'm storing my media files...

    I'd say storing your cache with your media would decrease your performance.  Having them on separate volumes/drives means that Premiere can read/write from them at the same time, instead of having to read/write one or the other, one at a time.
    Additionally, PPro is create cache files from your original media, and it's always best practice to read from one drive, while writing to another.
    TL;DR It's for Performance. ! ! ! !

  • What are the advantages / disadvantages of partitioning?

    I was wondering if there were any advantages to partitioning the hard drive. Seems this choice needs to be made when you first setup your Mac, and as mine is on its way the time to ask is now.
    Has anyone partitioned their drive? Why? Why not?

    James,
    The greatest advantage to having a secondary volume is that this will allow you to store much of your data on that secondary. For example, my iPhoto and iTunes libraries (by far the largest disk-eating portions of my data) are both stored on my secondary volume.
    This helps me manage the size of my HOME folder, and thus makes the maintainance of a comprehensive backup very much easier for me. In the event that I must format my startup disk and reinstall OS X, I will have less to worry about. You see, a secondary volume is much less likely to suffer from a crippling disk error than is a boot volume, and one volume can be formatted independently, without affecting the other.
    In addition to providing the constant protection for certain portions of my data, as outlined above, the secondary volume can be used to make or keep a backup of the rest of my HOME folder. I normally use an external drive to handle this, but that secondary volume can be used in a pinch. It's just one extra layer of protection.
    The only limitation to this scheme is that it doesn't provide any protection at all from a hardware failure of the drive, itself; it only helps reduce the pain of a file system catalogue failure on the boot volume.
    Scott

  • What are the advantages/disadvantages of using the Form Command over Creating a User Form in VBA?

    I’m in the early stages of creating a spreadsheet that will require data entry into the worksheet. The worksheet could get to 1000s of rows, depending on the particular user.
    When I refer to the ‘Form Command’ I’m referring to the option of adding a Quick Access Tool bar button by selecting ‘more commands’, ‘all commands’, ‘Form…’
    My questions/concerns would be relating to ‘should I develop this spreadsheet with the Form Command or a User Form in VBA?
    Concerns/Questions:
    Deployment to other users
    Protecting worksheet cells so the user can only add records using the form command or the user form in vba. In other words, don’t allow users to edit cells that are not within the table structure of the sheet or add rows if they’re not using the form
    Data validation when entering data…
    Keith
    Keith Aul

    Hi,
    Both variants have pro's and cons. If you plan to use VBA you have to consider the deployment settings on other p.c.'s where you have to allow macro's where as a regular form doesn't have the need for that.
    That said the userform gives you much more control because the form command is not saved. it is simply a temporary form which you have to setup every time. It's perfect for data entry. If you are looking for data validation the userform is the one to go
    for. You also have the possibility to work on placements of the data entry.
    So if you are looking for speed and simplicity then go for the form command. If it is handling control you are after I'd go for a userform.
    Just my 2 cts
    Maurice
    When you see answers and helpful posts, please click Vote As Helpful, Propose As Answer, and/or Mark As Answer. Thank You

  • What are the advantages/disadvantages of crypt vs. SHA for password encryption?

     

    Both crypt and SHA are one-way hashing algorithms.
    The crypt algorithm is provided for compatibility with Unix passwords. It accepts the first 8 characters of a password and the output is always 13 characters long and includes only the characters A-Z, a-z, 0-9, ., and /. It is generally weak and can be broken.
    SHA provides a 160 bit hash, is more secure, and is recommended by iPlanet.
    Regards,
    Craig

  • So what are the advantages with Intel?

    What are the advantages/disadvantages with these new Intel processors? Sheesh, I just bought a new laptop and now its outdated lol. Looks like I will try to seel this sucker, and buy the new ones when everything seems to stop updating at Apple...

    Basic Advantages... Faster speeds, lower heat. This makes any portable computer very happy.
    Basic Disadvantages... software compatibility problems? Native PowerPC applications now run in a sort of emulation mode. Users may need to migrate to software which runs natively on Intel Macs, or has Universal Binaries available. Could be an additional cost to the user.
    and buy the new ones when everything seems to stop updating at Apple...
    Stops updating?! If you wait for that, you'll never make a purchase. Technology changes very quickly, and it's nearly impossible to have the latest model for any decent length of time before it is updated.
    Keep in mind... when machines get updated, that does NOT mean the previous model is obsolete.
    I'm sure your current computer is still just as good as the day you bought it. No one is forcing you to upgrade.
    If your machine still suits your needs, then stay with it. I'm sure I'll get another 2-3 years of solid happy use from my G4 Powerbook.

  • What are the advantages and disadvantages to cookies?

    Ok, so I am required to interview some expert for a Final in college. I choose to do my final on cookies throughout the different browsers. The downside is that it is nearly impossible to get a one-on-one interview from an expert in this field. This is my next option. So here are my questions, and I greatly appreciate the help.
    1. What are the advantages and disadvantages of cookies?
    2. Where are the cookies stored, and is it possible for someone to access that information?
    3. You hear horror stories of hackers accessing the different cookies saved on a person's computer, and from there gradually piecing together enough information about that person, to hack into nearly every account they have. How probable is this? What safeguards can a person take against this happening?
    Once again, thank you for any help received.

    I attended uni back in the 70's, and as I recall we had to do some actual research for our term papers - like from books in the library, and needed to "document" our research in a footnote for each page.
    I guess times have changed a bit since then I guess - anecdotal evidence is permissible now?
    Here's a search of articles in the Mozilla Developer Network documentation.
    https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/tag/Cookies

  • What are the Advantages and Disadvantages of OC4J ?

    Hi,
    I want to know what are the advantages and disadvantages of OC4J server .
    Can anyone tell me please..
    Regards,
    Ajay

    simple, reliable, extremely fast and low cost of development: re-start takes 10 - 15 seconds. Its disadvantage may be less flexibility in configuration then heavy-weight Weblogic

  • What are the advantages and disadvantages of suppressed and unsuppressed content in indesign layer option?

    what are the advantages and disadvantages of suppressed and unsuppressed content in indesign layer option?

    I occasionally use layers set to suppress output for holding text that differs from the text in the visible part of a document that I need for variables or TOC entries sometimes, or for notes or guides I want in the file but I don't want printed. You might also want to suppress a layer with some sort of overlay, like the die-lines for a die-cut piece, when you export a PDF for screen viewing.
    I'm sure you can come up with other reasons for having content on a page in the layout, but not in the final output.

  • What are the advantages and disadvantages of suppressed and unsuppressed content?

    what are the advantages and disadvantages of suppressed and unsuppressed content?

    Hi Surya,
    surya n wrote:
    what are the advantages and disadvantages of suppressed and unsuppressed content?
    Are you referring to compressed files in your statement?
    If yes, then let me give you a general idea about it -
    Compressed file occupy less memory space as compared to its uncompressed counterpart, and hence can be uploaded/downloaded faster than the uncompressed one.
    Moreover Compressed files are less vulnerable to Malwares and Trojans, provided it is Locked and encrypted as well, Uncompressed files are more vulnerable to Malwares and viruses in general.
    I would love to help you with your query however i need to know that in which context you are asking this question so that i can point you in the right direction. Moreover please let me know if you are facing any type of Technical issue in any Adobe Product or Online service.
    Regards,
    Rahul

  • What are the advantages and disadvantages for the larger blocksize and for

    What are the advantages and disadvantages for the larger blocksize and for the smaller blocksize?

    Smaller blocksize
    Advantages
    GoodHas relatively large space overhead due to metadata
    (that is, block header).
    Not recommended for large rows. There might only
    be a few rows stored for each block, or worse, row
    chaining if a single row does not fit into a block, for small rows with lots of random
    access.
    Reduces block contention.
    Disadvantages
    Has relatively large space overhead due to metadata
    (that is, block header).
    Not recommended for large rows. There might only
    be a few rows stored for each block, or worse, row
    chaining if a single row does not fit into a block.
    Larger blocksize
    Advantages
    Has lower overhead, so there is more
    room to store data.
    Permits reading a number of rows into
    the buffer cache with a single I/O
    (depending on row size and block size).
    Good for sequential access or very large
    rows (such as LOB data).
    Disadvantages
    Wastes space in the buffer cache, if you are doing
    random access to small rows and have a large block
    size. For example, with an 8 KB block size and 50
    byte row size, you waste 7,950 bytes in the buffer
    cache when doing random access.
    Not good for index blocks used in an OLTP
    environment, because they increase block contention
    on the index leaf blocks.

  • What are the advantages and disadvantages

    Hi All,
                      What is the use of Master Data Management. And What are the advantages and disadvantages of Master Data Management.
    Thanks,
    Satish.

    Hi ,
    have a look on same thread :
    Re: MDM?
    - An
    Better search before posting .

Maybe you are looking for