What are the advanteges and disadvanteges of using pl/sql over hibernate

i knwo that pl/sql are well structure and provide a lot of functionalities with oracle databse , but my question is the hibernate might give some advnateges of scalability over pl/sql.
so what are the advanteges and disadvanteges of using pl/sql over hibernate?
and does oracle recommend using hibernate for connecting JSP with oracle 11i , or it is better to connect the JSP pages with oracle databse using pl/sql ?

812643 wrote:
but if i search for the diferencess then there are a lot of opinions about this ..., specially when they say that with hibernate you can integrate with any DB , and it provides object printed architecture, etc.All databases are not equal. This is a basic and fundamental fact. SQL-Server is not Oracle. Oracle is not SQL-Server. As it is the case with Sybase, Ingres, DB2 and other database products. They are all different. And there are some very core differences between them.
So how would a product like Hibernate treat these database products with their differences? By using the lowest common denominator. Which means your expensive database product is dumbed down - and even MS Access will likely have better and more features.
You also need to decide what is the "permanent" part in your architecture. What is going to the core? What is the expensive part? The app server (with Hibernate)? Or the database server?
What are you likely to change next year? The app server server? Or the database server?
In the vast majority of cases, the core is the database server. That is your biggest expense and investment. As it should be - as it holds that which is most precious to business, data. You want to ensure the integrity of that data. The accuracy of that data. Make sure that it can be easily backed up and recovered. Is flexible to use. Etc. Etc.
The database server is the core - and that is where you need to realise your return on investment. By using the database server to its full extent.
Hibernate does not do that. And in that respect, it is junk.
Why does it not do that? Because many Java developers are totally and fully clueless about what database servers are and how to use them. And want to use them as little plug-in black boxes - bit buckets that are only there to provide a data persistence layer. Instead of using the database server to its full extent, they instead use Hibernate, and try to do their own "+database thing+" in the app layer - and do it poorly and with utter lack of any scalability. (and no, only ignorant Java heads think that scalability means throwing more money and h/w at it)
My largest database processes billions of rows per day, every day, 356 days a year (between 350 to 450 million new inserts into a single table per day). And have been for several years now. It does so using PL/SQL. Using Oracle to its full extent. Then there are Java heads that cannot even design and code an app that effectively process 1% of this volume... and grasp at straws like Hibernate and other Java cr@p to "fix" this - when the actual problem is their total lack of ignorance in how to use and scale the database server.
Hibernate is trash - and a symptom of Java developers's ignorance of database technology.

Similar Messages

What are the Pros and Cons of Using Batch Numbers over Serialization

Dear SAP Gurus:
Will someone please give me the benefits of using Batch Management over serial numbers in this case scenerio, or vice versa:
Client wants to trace all the components of an assembly in a BOM. Even the Raw material. The client sends the material out today and has the vendor assign serial numbers to the individual pieces, the client gives the range of serial numbers to use. We are looking at using batch numbers to accomplish this and issue one material and batch number to a production order. Then use MB56 batch where used functionality to view history. I am wanting to understand the benefits of this. Please advise and points will be awarded as always.
Also, in this scenerio, can you issue multiple material/batch numbers to one vendor op that has its own production order?

Yes it is a subcontract.
Example: This is the solution but need the pros and cons of doing this scenerio
Sheet of metal sent to vendor to make lets say 1800 peices of material number nas5703-01. All 1800 pieces come back and issued to a production work order using one bacth number for one material item so that batch number can be traced in history in MB56 and a fit up report.

What are the pros and cons of using people keywords, given that my catalogue is already uptodate with regular keywording of all subjects? e.g., will the people keyword transfer to other programs?, can I use the same name for a people keyword and regular

What are the pros and cons of using people keywords, given that my catalog is already up to date with regular keywording of all subjects? e.g., will the people keyword transfer to other programs?, can I use the same name for a people keyword and regular keyword in the same photo?

What are the pros and cons of using people keywords, given that my catalog is already up to date with regular keywording of all subjects? e.g., will the people keyword transfer to other programs?, can I use the same name for a people keyword and regular keyword in the same photo?

What are the adv and disadv of using SRM as an addon?

Hi Friends
what are the adv and disadv of using SRM as an addon
Regards
Simha

Hi Simha,
Here are my view points on SRM and ECC one client deployment: The decison to have one client for SRM and ECC is more driven by the business model of the client and functionalities one need out of SRM .Following points needs to considered before deployment:
1) ERP and SRM as an add-on does not support any multiple-backend functions or hub deployment for procurement.
2) Upgrade or migration from SRM system to ERP with SRM as add-on is not supported
3) Strategic sourcing scenarios in SRM are not used by clients with such deployments
4) Although SRM is running on the same client as ECC the purchasing organization have to be maintained in both MM and SRM system
5) From HR Orgstructure stand point there is no additional benifit in same client deployment as compared to seperate deployment
6) From Security stand point its better to have a seperate client for SRM-vendor registration as this functionality is exposed to outside world and internet.
7) Master Data Synchronization is a positive point which is only available within the SRM Add-on deployment with ECC
8) For SRM and ECC (seperate) master data management remains asynchronous and unidirectional
Thanks,

What are the possibilities and limitation of using Out of the box content search webpart on SharePoint Online 2013/O365 ?

Hi All,
We are migrating from on-premise SharPoint 2010 to SharePoint online 2013.
I have few questions below:
What are the possibilities and limitations of using Out of the box content search webpart?
Also, how the cross site publishing will work in SharePoint online something with managed navigations and product catalog apporach? if it is not supported, then what are the alternatives to acheive the same?
Appriciate any commnets/clarifications.Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Dhananjay.

Here are the possibilities of Content search webparts
http://office.microsoft.com/en-in/office365-sharepoint-online-enterprise-help/configure-a-content-search-web-part-in-sharepoint-HA104119042.aspx
http://office.microsoft.com/en-in/office365-sharepoint-online-enterprise-help/when-to-use-the-content-query-web-part-or-the-content-search-web-part-in-sharepoint-HA104206662.aspx
Compare the strengths and limitations of the Web Parts
It’s important that you understand the strengths and limitations of the two Web Parts because if you choose the wrong one, your site could run into performance problems. You can use both Web Parts to show content that is based on a query. In a simplified
world, here’s how you can decide between the two:
Use the CQWP when you have a limited amount of content, your query is simple, and you don’t expect your content to grow much in the future.
Use the CSWP in all other scenarios when you want to show content that is based on a query.
The table below gives a comparison of the two Web Parts:
Web Part behavior
Content Query Web Part
Content Search Web Part
Query configuration
Easy
You’ll need to know about certain search features such as
managed properties.
Query across large amounts of content
Limited
Yes
Handle complex queries
Limited
Yes
Scale to handle future content growth
Limited
Yes
Display content from other site collections
No
Yes (see
section below)
Design of query results can be customized
Yes, by using XSLT.
Yes, by using HTML.
Maintenance cost in a complex site architecture
High
Small (see
section below)
Narrow down the query results that are displayed in the Web Part
No
Yes, in combination with the
Refinement Web Part.
It was not there previously but then it was added to Office 365
http://blogs.office.com/2013/10/29/search-innovations-for-site-and-portal-design-in-sharepoint-online/
If this helped you resolve your issue, please mark it Answered

What are the pros and cons re using an intel iMac vs MacPro with LP8?

I'm considering getting a new intel Mac in the near future (presuming a new MacPro will be released in the near future - maybe at the same time as Leopard). I compose largely for film and television and I am composing largely using a combination of loops, software instruments and some recorded live performance. I usually sync to a low res quicktime movie.
I do like the idea of a simple and uncluttered work environment with an iMac, added to which there's also a degree of portability with the iMac however the MacPro is obviously more powerful. I'm not sure how much the difference in power between the two computers would affect me.
Would I be compromising myself much if I went for the iMac over the MacPro? What are the pros and cons of the iMac vs the MacPro in relation to Logic Pro 8?

In the world large-scale music composition using samples, loops, etc (especially for film) your two biggest needs are RAM and HD speed/access. The imac looses big time in this department (as a single computer at least) as it can only be upgraded to 4gb ram, and only holds one internal HD, and also lacks any PCI expansion for DSP cards, audio interfaces, etc.
In generalyou want to separate your data vs applications as much as possible, to ensure both can be accessed quickly and easily by the computer. So its best to have your system software / applications on one internal HD, and your logic data (samples, audio recordings, loops) on another drive(s). You can do this with an iMac via USB, FW800, & FW400, but depending on how big your projects get, how many USB and FW drives / interfaces you use, and how much data you need to stream, you could overload the buss on the imac (not sure if it has multiple busses or not). Plus speed wise, internal SATA are much faster than external drives, and the mac pro with its 4 internal slots seems like a great choice for speed and flexibility.
However, if you dont find yourself doing large scale projects, then you might be better off going with an imac. We just purchased one for my father and it runs great! It blows the socks off of my Dual 2.5 G5 tower in terms of CPU speed! If you run into problems running things from the imac, you could always add a mac-mini down the road to stream sample libs, as a Logic node, etc, which seems to be a much more cost effective solution.
I hope this was helpful, but I probably just made the decision harder . In fact, if I were to start over today, I dont know if I'd go with a MacPro, or an iMac / mac mini combination. they both seem to have their advantages / disadvantages.
Best of luck!

What are the adm_modresname and adm_moduseruid parameters used for?

The following parameters are in the server configuration file (unison.ini).
What are these parameters used for? 

[UTL] 
adm_modresname = FALSE 
adm_moduseruid = FALSE 

These parameters accept only the default values shown above and are not
configurable. They were not meant to appear in the documentation or in the
default unison.ini file.

Please do not attempt to change these parameters.

Yes I have explored this pdf...but it doesn't tell how to use the policy from the BPM. My question is if I want to use the policies from BPM, then do I need to install the SSM ?
If yes, what are the correct steps of installation ?
I am getting the errors while configuring the Java SSM.
Is Admin in the same BEA-HOME as SSM: [default: Yes]:
Give the location of the Admin: c:\bea\ales32-admin
Enter the identity directory name which will be used: [default: CoESSM_dir]:
Enter the root node which will be used to create resources: [default: //app/policy/CoESSM_app]:
Checking if default ARME port is free: 8000
Generating policy files based on templates ...
Checking if SSM instance already present
Checking to see if SSM ARME port is free.
Checking JDBC parameters...
Checking to see if asipassword was run...
2010-03-15 18:06:59,295 [Main Thread] ERROR com.bea.security.SsmConfigTool.AlesConfig - You need to run asipassword first
2010-03-15 18:06:59,295 [Main Thread] ERROR com.bea.security.SsmConfigTool.ConfigurationTool - Error making changes: You need to run asipassword first
I have tried running the asipassword utility, but still it gives the same error. Please let me know what am I doing wrong?

What are the pros and cons of using a port system.

Hello All,
I'm a new explorer in the OS X UNIX world, and have installed macports, and, for the most part, succeeded in building and using a number of scientific applications.
I have noted a somewhat negative attitude by some on the use of port systems, while others seem quite content with them.
When making my decision to use macports, these "selling points" seemed desirable to me:
¤ Confines ported software to a private “sandbox” that keeps it from intermingling with your operating system and its vendor-supplied software to prevent them from becoming corrupted.
¤ Allows you to create pre-compiled binary installers of ported applications to quickly install software on remote computers without compiling from source code.
Especially the first point seems valuable, but am I deluding myself? Or, am I losing functionality/ flexibility? Or, am I just missing out on manually installing lots of dependents?
_I'm not trying to start a feud, here._
I'm just looking for some pointers (preferably well-substantiated) from those more knowledgeable than me, before I am any further committed to a choice I might later regret.
Thanks,
PWK

The biggest drawback/complaint I have is that you're bound by the implementation/installation policy of whoever built the port.
For example, take the installation issue - all software gets installed into some specific directory which is great one one hand - fewer compatibility issues with conflicting versions from what Apple provide. The downside, though, is that nothing on your machine will use these versions unless/until you tweak them.
For example, maybe you want to install the MacPorts version of PHP, great, but the standard Apache won't use that, so you either need to install the MacPorts version of Apache, or tweak your Apache installation to use the non-standard PHP version.
Well, what about PATHs, I hear you ask? well, sure, you could prepend the MacPorts/fink/whatever directory to your $PATH, but then you always use the MacPorts/fink/whatever version of any installed software which might not be what you want.
This becomes more of an issue in a multi-server environment where you have multiple systems that all need tweaking/maintaining - nothing worse than setting up a new server by copying an existing installation, only to find that it depends on MacPorts/fink/whatever being installed.
The corollary to this is that these package managers often install ancillary software that you do not need, nor want. It might have improved since I last looked, but installing either MacPorts or fink, for example, installs whole new versions of perl, GNU tools (gzip/gunzip, etc.), curl, and more - they even install new copies of openssl/ssh.
I don't want these. These already exist on my system so what are they needed for? Why can't they use the standard copies? Are they 'tweaked' in some way? How? why?
The secondary issue is that you are limited to the port's implementation - especially compile options - which may not be ideal for your machine.
Unlike most GUI-based software, much open-source software uses compile-time options to configure the executable. Now the port installer might do a reasonable job of tweaking the installation, but it's not psychic so there will be cases where you end up with sub-optimal installations. Sure, they might work well enough, but that doesn't beat knowing what those options are up-front and building your own.
Now there have been cases where I've tried to install software and almost given up when faced with a daunting list of dependencies (try RRD, or PHP w/ GD, for example) and have almost given up, but when you succeed the satisfaction of getting it working, plus the fact you now know how to do it counts for a lot.
Now, do I wish that Apple would do a better job of keeping up with the latest versions of the open source software they include in Mac OS X? absolutely - isn't that what Software Update is all about??). But I also wish the port maintainers would spend more of their time updating the original source configure and make scripts to incorporate whatever changes they're making to the code so that Mac users can easily use the same source distribution as other UNIX flavors.
And right there is the final rub IMHO - all the while the port managers create their distributions of common tools Mac OS X is treated like a poor step-child that's kept in the cellar. OK, maybe not that bad, but there's no reason why anyone who wants to install open source software on a Mac should need much more than:
(download>
./configure
make
sudo make install
it really isn't all that hard. Too often the port managers perpetuate the myth that Mac OS X is too different from other UNIX systems to work with the standard tools that everyone else knows.
Now, maybe I'm also too old for this game since you always downloaded and built tools yourself when I started, and maybe package managers on Linux (which may have the same issues I've complained about) have helped elevate Linux in the mindset of a younger generation who are looking for a quick fix. All I can say to that is…
GET OFF MY LAWN! :-D

What are the advantages and disadvantages to using Snow Leopard?

My computer runs best on Snow Leopard but can also run Lion. It's a 2009 Macbook unibody model.

telephonedude98 wrote:
My computer runs best on Snow Leopard but can also run Lion. It's a 2009 Macbook unibody model.
Since it's a 4 year old machine, in it's end of life stage and 10.7+ will slow it down in performance, I'd say stay on 10.6.8 and be happy.
10.6 still has a rather large amount of the OS X version market share and Apple isn't doing what they did under Jobs was to ignore a OS X version still in significant market share.
Apple HQ and about 750,000 Mac's got compromised by the Flashback botnet, so Apple went all the way back to 10.5 Intel to fix the problems they neglected so now they are paying better attention to the older OS X versions.
There will ALWAYS be a newer OS X version with more bells, whistles and eye candy to drive a hardware purchase, however unless your machine was purchased within a couple years of a new OS X release, it's likley best to just kick back and enjoy what you have and make it last.
There are people out there still running 10.5 on PowerPC machines even.
OS X 10.4/10.5 need to upgrade, 10.6.8 ok still
You can try to keep up with Apples asinine annual OS X release cycle, but it's only going to cost a lot more money in software, headaches and even bricked hardware, which occured to a LOT of people when 10.7 was released.
If a OS X upgrade bricks your machine and your not in AppleCare, your screwed.
http://roaringapps.com/apps:table
If your machine can't go to 10.8, then it can't do 10.9, so you'll be behind again here shortly when it's released this fall.

What are the /rpc/ and /ews/ folders used for in Microsoft Exchange Server?

I come across these two folders constantly when seeing the Microsoft Exchange server externally (other folders are usually /owa/, /powershell/ and /ecp/.
I've looked everywhere online I can think of but cannot find an easy-to-understand description that clearly understands it.
I notice that both folders are blocked by login boxes which are usually either Basic or NTLM authentication, why is this? Should they be hidden completely from external access?
Any help will be much appreciated, this is also my first post so apologies for any conventions I've missed.

More information here
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/mvpawardprogram/archive/2013/03/18/virtual-directories-exchange-2013.aspx
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg247612(v=exchg.150).aspx
DJ Grijalva | MCITP: EMA 2007/2010 SPA 2010 | www.persistentcerebro.com

What are the Major and Minor Diffs between oracle,sql server,MSAccess

Hi all,
Can any one explain or send me all the diff between
oracle ,sql server,access..like how much data can each
support,...
Thanks

Dear sir,
here it is.
http://www.oracle.com/database/product_editions.html

HT204053 What are the pros and cons of 1) choosing to use the SAME Apple ID for iCloud services on one side, and purchases on the iTunes Store, App Store, and iBookstore, on the other side; or 2) to have and use two separate Apple Ids for these "two sides

All is in the title, so I repeat it below with a better identation.
What are the pros and cons of
1) choosing to use the SAME
Apple ID for iCloud services on one side, and
purchases on the iTunes Store, App Store, and iBookstore, on the other side; or
2) to have and use two separate Apple Ids for these "two sides"?
P.S.
I have loads and loads of free podcasts in iTunes in my iMac, that are certainly more thant the 5 gigas the iCloud provides for free, so I don't want those to go to the cloud. But this is perhaps a different question...
Also need to mention that I have itunes on a mac, a pc and an iphone.
Sorry to look so silly with this question, but I don't get the "big picture".

You need to create a user account for your wife (or yourself depending on who has the current user account). When syncing, each of you should sign in as a separate user, login to iTunes and then sync. I had this problem when my sister got an iPhone. When we did her initial sync, everything on my iPhone showed up on hers. Apple gave me this solution.

What are the different tools(software) we used in support projects and avi

hi,
What are the different tools(software) we used in support projects(sap) and aviailable in market??/
Thanks,
bajee

Hey Bajee,
I believe you are talking about Ticketing tool used for AMS ( Application Management Support )....
There are several tools available for this by several vendors....
They are Magic Service desk, HP open view, BMC remedy, Peregrine help desk, SAP Solution Manager can also be used as support desk tool...
I hope that what you asked for and if its not then please clarify your questions !!
Inspire ppl by rewarding !!
Regards,
Anand

What are the charges, and who pays if I send a text overseas?

What are the charges, and who pays if I send a text overseas?

You pay as part of your cellular/telephone bill unless you use Wi-Fi which is free.

What are the pros and cons of installing java+abap stack for portal?

Hi all,
1.What are the pros and cons of installing java+abap stack for portal?
2.what effect it does on the ume options to be choosen??
3.for the purpose of integration of r3,bw and crm on portal and crm 4.0 60.2.3 business package which option of stack(java or abap or both)will be good option and which ume option while installation should be choosen?
regards
Rajendra

Hi Rajendra,
The NetWeaver Installation Master Guide offers some good scenarios on the pros and cons:
https://websmp201.sapag.de/~sapidb/011000358700005412792005E.pdf
In a nutshell:
ABAP+JAVA
Pros
- Decrease # of servers required to administer the portal
- Less costly
Cons
- Upgrades could be dependent on ABAP and Java release level
- Additional load on the server due to ABAP stack
- Limited scalability
JAVA and ABAP on separate server
Pros
- Improved performance
- Allows each system to be single-use purpose therefore downtime does not affect other components
- More scalable
Cons
- Adds complexity to landscape
- Additional costs
Regards,
Thomas Pham

What are the advanteges and disadvanteges of using pl/sql over hibernate

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for