What is most important - processor speed, RAM or flash storage?

My son is in the 9th grade and I'm about to buy a Macbook Air for him.  I have a limited amount of money to spend, and I'd like to get the best value for my dollar.  He will primarily use it in school, for homework, surfing the web, social media, watching videos (not making) and downloading music.  He ocasionally downloads movies, but not often at all.  The most important factor for him is speed.  He is an impatient downloader and web surfer, so the quicker the better for him.  Given this profile, does he need the i7 processor, or will the i5 suffice?  4 GB or RAM, or do I need to bump up to 8GB?  Can I get by with 128 GB of Flash storage, or will that slow the system down too much and I need to go with 256GB?  I'm just not in a position to spend $1800 on a computer.  Also, when he graduates from high school, then buying an upgraded machine is definitely an option, I'm just trying to get him through high school with the needs he has now.
Thanks!

The larger SSD are up to 400MBs faster due to SSD densities.
however any macbook needs an external HD for large media storage and necessary data redundancy / backups.
128GB is plenty for most everyone,  you need an external HD regardless,  NO SSD is big enough to be used as a mass storage device.
see here:
Solid State Drive usage premise, or the “more space / upgrade SSD” question
There have been questions posed and positions taken by many people who are trying to use their Macbook Air or Pro’s solid state drive (SSD) as a mass media storage device, for either pictures, videos, massive music collections or all three combined; but this should not be the working premise of a ‘limited’ SSD and its use.
In which, it’s the case of those users with either 128GB, 256GB, or even 512GB of internal SSD space, that have or are running “out of space”, that questions are raised. The immediate premise of some users can sometimes be “(how to / if) upgrading my SSD” when in fact in nearly all instances another approach is the logical and sensible one that needs to be looked into and exercised.
Any Macbook containing a SSD should be idealized as a ‘working platform’ notebook containing all your applications, documents, and weekly or bi-weekly necessary files. All collections of media files such as pictures, music, and videos, unless directly needed should be kept off the notebook and on an external hard drive or likewise. While the ‘working platform’ premise is also the case with larger internal conventional hard drives of 1TB+, its implementation isn't as critical except in terms of data protection.
Realistically, you should at most coordinate roughly 20 to 25% of your total SSD space to all audio-video personal use media (picture / music / video collections), leaving the remaining amount on an external HD.
Nobody should consider any notebook a data storage device at any time under any circumstance, rather a data creation, sending, and manipulation device; and in the case of a SSD, this is more important for purposes of having sufficient working space on the SSD and reducing SSD ‘bloat’ in which cases someone is wrongly attempting to use the SSD space as a large media storage nexus.
The rare exception to the collective usage and premise of SSD use in which a much larger SSD is truly needed are for those in video and photography professions that require both the extremely fast speeds of the SSD and the onboard storage for large and or many video and photography files. However this also falls under the premise of a ‘working platform’ for such peoples rather than the intent of many who are using the SSD as passive and static data storage for media files very infrequently needed or accessed.
All on-notebook data collections should be logically approached as to necessity, and evaluated as to whether it is active or passive data that likely doesn’t need to be on the notebook, allocations of space-percentages to as-needed work and use, apportioning space for your entertainment media, and questioning whether it should it be on the notebook for more than short-term consumption.
Considerations should be made in the mind of any user in differentiating the necessary system data (System hub) comprising the Mac OSX, applications, necessary documents that both must and should be on your internal SSD, and that of the users personal data (Data hub) comprising created files, pictures, music, videos, PDF files, data created or being created and otherwise, that likely unless being used soon or often should be parked on an external hard drive for consumption, or temporarily loading onto the internal SSD.
You both can and should purchase whichever SSD size you need or see fit, but even in the case of the largest of SSD, unless use-considerations are made, and SSD spaces are allocated as should be the case indicated above, one can easily and immediately run into this quandary of “needing more internal SSD space”, in which instance a different approach in usage must then be implemented.
However it is almost always the case, that such large media files are wanted to be stored internally rather than actually needed, in which case the external HD is both prudent as well as necessary. Additionally costs per MB are infinitely less on an external HD than an internal SSD in any consideration of data expansion needs.
A Professional Example
In the case of a Macbook Air or Macbook Pro Retina with ‘limited’ storage on the SSD, this distinction becomes more important in that in an ever rapidly increasing file-size world, you keep vital large media files, pics, video, PDF collections, music off your SSD and archived on external storage, for sake of the necessary room for your system to have free space to operate, store future applications and general workspace. 
You should also never be put in the position of considering “deleting things” on your Macbook SSD in order to ‘make space’. This is especially what your external HD is for.
Professionals who create and import very large amounts of data have almost no change in the available space on their notebooks internal SSD because they are constantly archiving data to arrays of external or networked HD.
Or in the case of the consumer this means you keep folders for large imported or created data and you ritually offload and archive this data for safekeeping, not only to safeguard the data in case your Macbook has a SSD crash, or gets stolen, but importantly in keeping the ‘breathing room’ open for your notebook to operate, expand, create files, add applications, for your APPS to create temp files, and for general operation.
Slim USB3 1TB external hard drive
External Hard Drives
External hard drives are both extremely cheap and regardless of the size of your internal SSD (or even internal hard drive if the case), you need an external hard drive with your SSD equipped Macbook for several reasons:
1. Data backup and protection.
2. Redundancy for important data.
3. Necessitated ideal space for large media files for collections of pictures, videos, and music etc.
While ever changing in price, typical portable 2.5” external hard drives in USB3 run roughly $65 for 1TB or $120 for 2TB small portable USB3 hard drives. Such drives range in thickness between 5mm and 15mm, with recent improvements in storage of 500GB drives in 5mm profiles.
There is almost no premise in which a small 12mm thick 1 Terabyte USB hard drive cannot be taken along with any Macbook as an external large storage extension inside any Macbook carry case or pouch. Typically such external HD profiles are not much bigger than a deck of cards.
External hard drives are a foregone necessity for purchase with any Macbook for at the very least Time Machine backups, data redundancies, and ideally for large media storage.

Similar Messages

  • I cannot reactivate my e-reader with my existing Adobe ID and password which are both correct. I alwayss get the message "activation server error, Code: E_AUTH_NOT_READY" What kind of problem is this and what is most important, how can I solve it quickly.

    I cannot reactivate my e-reader with my existing Adobe ID and password which are both correct. I alwayss get the message "activation server error, Code: E_AUTH_NOT_READY" What kind of problem is this and what is most important, how can I solve it quickly. I am on holiday and want to read. Thanks for speedy reply.

    Yes, actually I talk about Digital editions. Do you know how to solve the problem as described in my first mail for Digital Editions? Thanks for your  kind assistance.

  • Upgrading RAM and Flash Storage for higher capacity

    If I purchase a MacBook Pro with Retina Display with 8GB or RAM and 256GB Flash Drive, can I later upgrade the RAM and Flash Drive for higher capacity?

    Just to clarify...
    If I were to purchase a "regular" MacBook Pro (non-"retina", DVD drive, FireWire port, etc.) and seek aftermarket options for...
    (1: replacing the main RAM with 16 gigabytes of RAM (I understand that the newest "regular" MBP is limited to a BTO option of only 8 GB.)
    and
    (2: replacing the hard drive with a larger-capacity aftermarket Solid State Drive, preferably one with a capacity of either 768 gigabytes or 1 terabyte.
    Do such aftermarket options exist for the newest "regular" MacBook Pro? Can this model handle 16 GB of RAM? If there are aftermarket kits available, who installs them?

  • What are most important preferences to set in LR 5

    Now that I have finally got LR5 loaded and my previous catalog imported with the great help of Briian and Victoria the question remains.....what preferences do I surely need to set?
    I could just look at my LR 4.4, but are there others that might apply to 5 that are particularly important?

    I'm not sure what all the defaults are at the moment, but check these:
    * Set: 'Treat JPEG files next to raw files as separate photos' (If you shoot raw+jpeg, unless you want to have no access whatsoever to those jpegs in Lr).
    * Clear: 'Store presets with this catalog', unless you need different presets with different catalogs...
    * As Desired: 'Automatically write changes into XMP' - I prefer saving manually, but I recommend either saving manually or checking this box.
    The defaults are mostly well-chosen by Adobe so you don't generally need to worry about them until needs arise... But do look them over...
    Also, if you have an especially large or especially small monitor, you may need to bump or reduce the standard preview size (in catalog settings), respectively. It's not that critical, but it'll perform a little better if this setting is not too far off.
    And, if you keep private photos in with the rest, clear: 'Show photos in navigator on mouse-over', lest you embarrass yourself when showing photos to others.
    Cheers,
    Rob

  • IF erasing HD what is most important to save and from where?

    I may have to erase my HD which is a good thing but from where would I get my applications and mail and web info from to make sure I save the important information stuff. From the HD icon or user (home) icon. What would the folders and files look like?

    Hello Jan:
    Out of curiosity, why erase your HD?
    If OS X has severe problems, I would not erase and install. I would use the archive and install feature which installs a fresh copy of OS X while, at the same time, saving your files, programs, and settings:
    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=107120
    As an aside, backing up is always a good procedure before any software changes.
    Barry
    Barry

  • Can I upgrade my RAM/Flash Storage on my late 2013 13" retina display macbook pro?

    I had just purchased my first macbook  on Christmas and it came on January 3, 2014. I realized that I only had 128GB of flash storage and 4GB of RAM. Now I am wondering if I can upgrade to 8GB of ram and 256GB (for future purposes)? If so, how much will it cost? If not, what do you recommend to save/gain flash storage?

    If you exchange it, the Apple Store will assist you in migrating your data. Just, obviously, make sure to ask before the actual exchange occurs. You can alternatively make a Time Machine backup of your current machine and use Set-up assistant on the new machine.
    The cost of flash storage/GB is dropping rapidly, but you are so much better off exchanging it if you are still able too. Most importantly, the new PCIe based flash storage for your model has not yet surfaced outside Apple. So, currently, 1) it wouldn't make sense to perform this upgrade, 2) you can't, to my knowledge. See:
    How to Upgrade Retina MacBook Pro SSD Storage (13-Inch ...

  • Advice Needed - What's more important: Number of cores, RAM, Processor? Comparing similarly priced Macbook Pro's from 2012 - 2013

    What is more important? Cores, RAM, Processors etc?
    There are several models available right now on the apple store that are similarly priced but offer different specs.
    I'm looking to purchase a secondary Mac for making music (house/techno in Logic) on the move and to be able to carry out basic work tasks.
    The models at similar prices available are:
    Refurbished 13.3-inch MacBook Pro 2.9GHz Dual-core Intel i7      
    Originally released June 2012
    13.3-inch (diagonal) LED-backlit glossy widescreen display, 1280-by-800 resolution
    8GB (2 x 4GB) of 1600MHz DDR3 SDRAM
    750GB Serial ATA @ 5400 rpm
    8x double-layer SuperDrive (DVD±R DL/DVD±RW/CD-RW)
    Intel HD Graphics 400
    Refurbished 15.4-inch MacBook Pro 2.3GHz Quad-core Intel i7
    Originally released June 2012
        15.4-inch (diagonal) LED-backlit glossy widescreen display, 1440-by-900 resolution

        4GB (2 x 2GB) of 1600MHz DDR3 SDRAM
        500GB Serial ATA @ 5400 rpm
        8x double-layer SuperDrive (DVD±R DL/DVD±RW/CD-RW)
        NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M with 512MB of GDDR5 memory
    Macbook Pro 13-inch: 2.4GHz with Retina display Dual-core Intel i5
    2.4GHz dual-core Intel Core i5
    Turbo Boost up to 2.9GHz
    8GB 1600MHz memory
    256GB PCIe-based flash storage1
    Intel Iris Graphics
    Built-in battery (9 hours)2
    Which should I go for? Is retina all together a better machine and a good enough update, or should i go for a 2012 model which is almost maxed out like 15.4?
    Any advice and experience of these machines is appreciated.
    Thanks,
    kkd_ldn

    kkd_ldn,
    because the RAM in the Retina models is non-upgradeable, I’d say that RAM is most important on the Retina models.
    All of the models above will perform basic work tasks well; I haven’t tried making music on my Mac, so I don’t know what the bottleneck there might be. If it’s CPU-intensive, then the 15-inch quad-core model might be the best choice, despite its slower CPU speed. You can upgrade the RAM on the non-Retina models if RAM turns out to be a bottleneck.

  • What matters most when buying a new PC?

    It happens sporadically at first. Every now and then your computer freezes and you have to force restart. Documents are saving slower and you begin to notice a consistent lag. You are in denial but it quickly becomes too obvious to ignore –your computer is slowly fading. You spend hours freeing up space, removing bloatware and running diagnostics. It might hobble along for a while before you find yourself wondering if today will be day it finally fails to boot. It’s been a while since you bought a computer (because you own a ThinkPad, of course!) but it’s time to starting looking around at options.
    Regardless of your purchasing habits, deciding to buy a computer is deeply personal. We all have preferences and requirements when searching for “the one” – that perfect device that combines all your requirements with just enough extras to get you truly excited. Our ThinkPad Product Marketing Team is inspired by you and wants to make your choice simple! This leads me to one of the core questions we wrestle with every day:
    What is the key technology or specification you look at first when deciding on what new PC to purchase?
    Is 16GB of memory an absolute deal breaker, or is screen resolution more important? Please let us know your thoughts! 

    Hello,
    When I make a decision to purchase new systems, the first thing I think about is how long I wish to use them for in their primary role (which may be for 2-4 years), then a secondary role (another 2-4 years), and finally as use as a spare/backup system (indefinite, but in practicality it is based on available of storage and what the tax incentive is for donating them that fiscal year).  This is at a medium-sized global company (1,000+ employees), for reference.
    The reason for the long use cycle (which originally started at two years, and is now up to four years on some systems) is the lack of substantial changes in system requirements for Windows since 2007 when Windows Vista was released in 2007.  Yes, there have been a lot of advances in hardware as well as some new features that are great for the corporate environment (TPM 2.0, etc., SATA rev. 3.0, USB 3.0, etc.) , but the base system requirements themselves have only incrementally changes in terms of processor speed, RAM and disk space.
    Because we are planning on using our notebook computers for several purposes over such a long lifecycle, there are several features which are important to us:
    Expandability - storage, memory and processors must be socketed so that systems can be upgraded without having to replace a user's system wholesale.
    By the way, a single RAM socket or soldered RAM and a single socket solution isn't acceptable to us; minimum of two sockets are required
    Easy of service - system has to be easily repairable, which means using things like screws, as opposed to clips,etc.
    Build quality/ruggedness - system has to be durable enough able to last for a long time, and also have replacement parts sourceable.
    As a result of this approach, we've ruled out certain classes of machines.  For example, ultrabooks and slim laptops are being phased out, because of upgrade limitations, difficulty in servicing and lack of durability.  Unfortunately, we will have to continue to deploy/use them as they trickle in during the current fiscal year.
    For employees like executives, this doesn't really apply to them, but they only count for a fraction of deployed systems.
    In terms of technical specs, here are some of the things we look for at (in no particular order):
    1920x1080 display option
    ability to upgrade to 16GB ram (everday notebook), 32GB of RAM (workstation/power-user notebook)
    ability to use M.2 (formerly mSATA) SSD and a 2.5" drive (could be HDD or SSD, 7.5mm high is fine) simultaneously
    USB ports (it never seems like there are enough; USB 3.1 will probably be a requirement at some point)
    GbE port
    Mini DisplayPort (for projectors in conference rooms)
    dock connector on bottom (not USB dock)
    ability to drive a minimum of two monitors (3 is better... have a lot of weird solutions for that, USB video cards, Matrox splitters, etc.)
    Things that we don't need:
    optical disc drives (can attach via USB, but some people use the slot to add a third HDD/SSD)
    VGA connectors (no longer use, we equip employees with dongles if they're going on the road to give presos)
    Personally, I'd really like to see one eSATAp port remain on models; it's much more efficient/readily supported for disk cloning/forensics/bulk copying activities.
    Hope this helps!  Please let me know if you have any further questions.
    Regards,
    Aryeh Goretsky
     

  • Looking to buy new MacBook Pro for editing with Premiere/After Effects, but wondering about trade-off between Processor Speed and Graphics Card

    I'm a professional video editor (using Premiere and After Effects) looking to buy a new MacBook Pro and am deciding between two models. The slightly older model has a 2.8GHZ i7 (3rd generation) Quad Core processor with a 1GB SDRAM of NVIDIA GE FORCE GT 650M Graphics Card. Then newer model has a 2.3GHZ i7 (4th generation) Quad Core preocessor with 2GB SDRAM of NVIDIA GE FORCE 750M/Intel Iris Pro Graphics Card.
    Which makes the most difference (processor speed vs. graphics card) with editing with Premiere and After Effects?
    Any help/guidance would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks!
    mike

    Poikkeus wrote:
    1. Your MBP will be somewhat slower than your iMac, as reflected in the general speed; desktop Macs have more RAM and storage.
    You recon? If he get's the 17", he would have up to 8x more RAM, 4 x more GPU,, and  a bit faster CPU;.
    2. Be aware of the advantages and disadvantages of extra RAM. Loading up the slot will make juggling multiple applications easier, like Photoshop, VLC, and Safari. However, more than 4gigs of RAM will make loading your MBP on startup twice as slow - at least a minute, probably longer. That's why a MBP user with extra RAM should sleep their machine nearly always when not in use, rather than powering off. 
    I did not know this, I just upgraded from 4gb to 8gb the other day. Have not noticed it being slower, but I don't often shut it down. It's nice to not even have to bother with ifreemem.
    3. Additional storage and RAM will maximize the basic capabilities of your MBP, but you won't be able to make a 2.3ghz machine any faster than it already is.
    SSD
    4. I still feel that your iMac will be faster than your prospective MBP. The only way to dramatically increase the speed would be the installation of a SSD drive (like the lauded OWC series). But they're not cheap.
    I don't want to rain on your parade, but want you to get a more realistic idea of your performance.
    I chose a macbook pro, 17" of cause. I use it for gaming. Yes a iMac is better for gaming. But, it's nice to be able to move around. Set up a man cave in the lounge 1 week, or in the bedroom, the next. But you fork out a lot more dosh for that luxury. And yes, not as much power as Poikkeus has said.

  • 4GB memory on new MacBook Pro Retina 13 with 2.4GHz dual core i5 processor &128GB flash storage

    Hello,
       I'm completely new to the mac world but I'm fed up with pc's and all the insanity with processor problems, viruses, etc. I'm seriously looking at replacing my HP laptop with the new MacBook Pro Retina 13 with 2.4GHz dual core i5 processor, 4GB memory (RAM) & 128GB flash storage, OS X Mavericks (not sure which version). My concern is whether this will be reliably & consistantly fast & smooth both in desktop apps & internet use. I don't need it to do somersaults or anything too advanced. I would mostly be using Pages & spreadsheet apps & internet. It would double as my daughter's computer for cyber school so it's crucial that it runs quickly & efficiently. If she can't complete everything on time or log in to her online sessions because of a computer issue we'll be up a creek without a paddle since this particular cyber school's tech department is still working off of pc's running Windows XP. My father, thus far a pc user, thought I should consider moving up to 8GB memory but I was hoping that with flash storage being faster, I would be able to avoid the extra $100 for the upgrade to 8GB. My biggest fear is finding myself as frustrated & angry as I am now with all of my pc's, ready to take a sledge hammer to them because they take forever to boot, launch apps, internet or do just about anything (that is if they're even fuctioning at all- not joking). Does anyone have any advice or input?   Thanks!!
    P.s. On Apple's site I found a refurbished late 2013 model of the MacBook Pro Retina 13 with all of the same specs as listed above (4GB, not 8GB), running OS X (doesn't say which one) but for a bit less than a brand new one. Is this the same model as what they're currently selling new in their store or did they just upgrade everything to match what is being offered in the current "new" model? I realize this may be a dumb question but I can't seem to find anything online indicated that Apple has released a model newer than what was released late last year (October 2013, I believe), except that the model released then came with SSD storage instead of flash.

    No computer is fault free but Apple MBPs have a good track record.  In those cases where problems do arise, Apple has the best support in the industry.
    A MBP with 4 GB RAM with the SSD storage should be adequate for your needs.
    lsmoondancer01 wrote:
    P.s. On Apple's site I found a refurbished late 2013 model of the MacBook Pro Retina 13 with all of the same specs as listed above (4GB, not 8GB), running OS X (doesn't say which one) but for a bit less than a brand new one. Is this the same model as what they're currently selling new in their store or did they just upgrade everything to match what is being offered in the current "new" model?
    The latest MBP models came out in October 2013, so it will be the same, with the same warranty and telephone support.  The difference will be that the price will be less and it will be delivered in a plain white box.
    I have purchased three MBPs from the refurbished section.  I have never been able to detect any cosmetic differences and will go that route again.
    Ciao.

  • What's the difference between flash storage and solid state drive in MacBook Pro?

    What's the difference between MacBook Pro with flash storage and MacBook Pro with solid state drive?

    A SSD is packaged like any other notebook drive. Flash storage uses a different design and layout that connects directly to the motherboard using PCIe. It is faster than a normal SSD.
    SSD vs HDD: What's the Difference? | PCMag.com
    what are the differences between solid state drive and flash storage ...

  • Can't decide on how much RAM and flash drive..

    Hi, I've just started my university course in Graphic Design, so I'll be needing to use programs such as photoshop.. indesgin.. illustrator. I want to buy a macbook pro 15, but I'm not sure if I should conisder upgrading to\or purchasing one with the highest amount RAM or Flash storage, or both! The 16gb Macbook is quite a bit more exspensive... so I was thinking to purchase the 8gb one for £1,563.60 and then upgrade it to 16gbRAM, do you think that's the best solution? or should I also be getting the higher amount of flash drive? (the 512GB instead of the 256GB)
    Thank you

    The RAM is integral to the logic board.  There is no upgrading.  Hardrive is not user changable.
    A drawback of the rMBP.
    At time of purchase only.
    MacBook Pro (15-inch Mid 2012), OS X Mavericks (10.9), i7 500GB 16GB RAM iPhone5 iOS7.0.3

  • What is the most important part of PC to speed up global code replacement on thousands of pages?

    Hi,
    I hope you can help and give me an advise.
    I have a task to replace part of HTML code on a lot of websites with thousands of pages. On my PC Core Duo the process off relpacing bit of codes is quite slow. I am looking for a new PC and taking this task into account. What part of the PC would speed up this process the most and what configuration would you reccommend. Is the fastest processor most important, more fast memory or Ultra fast HDD. I believe all are important but I have to cut the corners and get the best cost/speed solution for that task. Many thanks for your help in advance.

    Coming from a single core 32 bit Windows 7 to a quad core 64 bit with Windows 8, I noticed a marked improvement in pereformance on "batch changes". While the RAM usage is realtively the same (nearly 50% of 2Gb on the old, and only slightly more than 1Gb of 4 on the new) I'd say the processor has a lot to do with it. The old was 2.1gHz, and the new is 2.4, but having three more cores and a 64 bit architecture makes it run much faster.

  • I'm a recently graduated film student and my macbook pro needs an upgrade... Will be using FCPX, Adobe CS6 etc. Which 15' macbook pro will be best suited for me? I'm most concerned about the processor speeds (what do they really mean in english?)

    I need a new 15" MBP for film editing. The processor speed numbers are confusing.

    The Tech Specs for the MBPr are here:http://www.apple.com/macbook-pro/specs-retina/ and you can see both 15" models come with the i7 processor, one at 2.0 and the other at 2.3 GHz.  The processors are identical except for the clock speed, which directly indicates how many calculations a second they can perform.  If you are doing things like editing or rendering or ray tracing, heavy duty computational things, the faster the processor, the less time it takes to do the task.
    But the 2.3 GHz machine has even more, twice the memory and twice the storage capacity.  With film work that will get to be important since you can load more directly into memory where it is readily accessible to the processor, and twice the storage so you do not have to move material to an external drive so soon.  Both of which will contribute to faster workload turn around for you.
    For your needs, the faster machine with twice the memory and twice the SSD storage will be the thing you need.  And, keep in mind that the MBP cannot be upgraded after purchase like in the past.  So get all you will need now at the time of purchase.

  • Laptop Video Editing: What are the MOST important specs

    I've been editing, for a while now, various projects of various lenghts shot on my HV20, on an IMac using Adobe Premiere Pro. Actually, I bought the CS4 Extended Production Suite. It came with OnLocation, which is, I think, a fantastic tool. I really want to be able to record and monitor my future shoots using OnLocation. I've seen how useful monitors and scopes are on set, and the idea of being able to shoot in HD and actually checking the focus on something larger than a few inches is very appealling!
    So a laptop is in my future. Now, what are the most important specs?
    I could buy 1) a barely used Macbook pro early 08- 17" HD led display ,4g Ram ddr2 ,nvidia 8600M GT 512 VRAM ,800Mhz BUS, 200G 7200HD
    and have enough money left to buy an Apple Display 30" refurb
    OR 2) a new Macbook pro 17, 4 g Ram ddr3, 512 VRAm, 4g Ram ddr3, double procsessors 9400M+9600M GT 512 VRAM, 1066 BUS, 500G 7200HD
    and wait for a second display!
    Plus, of course, a portable External Scratch Drive on the Express Card. Now, if that fast drive is handling the footage, could'nt I settle for a 5400HD in the laptop,, they seem much less prone to problems-clicking noise, heat-than the 7200, especially in the new unibody model. Is 800 versus 1066 BUS a terrible trade-off? In terms of secondary displays , I've heard less than lukewarm things about the new Apple 24 LED (glossy is no-no for me).
    My intentions are to make documentaries and short fictions as well. I make a living as an actor so I don't need to be performing as a director/editor business wise!
    I do want to explore that side of the craft, in a professional and enjoyable way though. I know that, in addition to the laptop, I will get a MacPro in a few years.
    Thanks a lot for the inputs!

    CPU, RAM, bus speed, system HD, external HD, graphics - basically in that order
    You should think in terms of purchasing for maximum future use. In that regard the new 17" MacBookPro is the way to go. The specs are significantly better than the early '08 MacBook and you will be much happier in the long run with performance, software support and longevity.
    If you really need a large display, consider a 24" Dell, HP, NEC, etc. in the $200-$300 price range to stay within your total budget. You will be pleasantly surprised how good they are.
    You could start out with the 5400rpm system HD - you can replace it anytime with a 7200rpm drive if necessary for hardly any more $ than it would cost in the first place; and replacing it does NOT void your warranty. But you WILL want/need a good external FW800 or eSATA drive (for eSATA you will need an eSATA expressCard/34 however) no matter what.
    One other thought, if your primary use will be with an external display, and you don't actually need eSATA capability (FW800 will do you just fine at this point), then the 15" 2.66GHz or 2.8GHz MacBookPro models will be just fine at a significantly lower cost than the 17" model.

Maybe you are looking for

  • TS2446 Please help my apple id has been disabled

    And not for security reasons

  • SQL Query execution with LISTAGG

    Hello, I am trying to get some data using LISTAGG functionality. I have below query with works fine with the table, but not with the rowsource which is based on same table. SELECT COL1,LISTAGG(COL3, ',') WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY COL2) AS fieldName FROM

  • Variance for total invoice amount

    Hi Experts, Please advise which variance i can use for total invoice amount. We have price and quantity varaince at item level. But at header level for total invoice amount there is no variance. User is able to enter any amount and it is going to "In

  • [solved] Problems compiling hydrogen

    I'm trying to compile hydrogen version 0.9.4, so I can use Qt4. I made a PKGBUILD by editing the PKGBUILD of ABS and following the instructions of this page It compiles everything ok, but the problem is when running 'make install', I guess. I'm compi

  • Lumia 920 Linking Contacts

    If I save a contact under a hotmail account on my 920, will they then appear as a contact when I access hotmail through a computer? Solved! Go to Solution.