What version of the DAQmx driver is compatible with DAQmx 8.5.11.22

Hi;
I have a a new software in charge.
It's including NAtionalInstruments.DAQmx V8.5.11.22 and NationalInstruments.Commun V8.1.11.168.
Does somebody know what is the driver version, that I need to install before deploying ?
Regards
Join: the error shown at runtime
Attachments:
ErrorAtRuntime.jpg ‏15 KB

DAQmx is a driver.  So I'm really confused at your question.
What software are you using?  Based on the version numbers, it look a lot like you ae using TestStand, but I can't say for certain.  Is there more to the error window?  You seem to have cut part of it off.
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines

Similar Messages

  • What versions of the Home Hub are compatible with ...

    I've heard verbally from a variety of people (all paid by BT) that v1 Hubs won't work properly with 21CN and I have certainly just had a "user 21CN upgrade experience" that confirms that - exchange got upgraded, my profile  which used to be over 5000 using a previously satisfactory v1 Hub immediately dropped to half that, and as soon as I connected with a new v2.0 hub, the profile shot up to 21CN levels which were more than double the pre-upgrade levels.
    It would be great to see a formal response from BT about this and some published documentation about which hubs are compatible, and also a clear statement of what BTs formal policy is on how v1 Hub owners are dealt with when exchanges are upgraded to 21CN.Possibly also updating the online help files and FAQs about 21CN?
    It would also be good if the overseas support staff were briefed on the matter and given an appropriately updated script.
    I would like to thank the excellent UK based support team, accessed via the online contact route, and the BTOpenreach engineers who were all excellent. At the moment I am very satisfied with the result - but would like reassurance that OTHER customers who might be struggling with poor speeds after a 21CN upgrade, purely because of having a v1 Hub, (or even a 1.5 hub?) are not subjected to a lot of frustration, wasted engineer visits etc. when just sending them a new 2.0 or 2.1 hub might solve their problem.
    My broadband secrets and tips

    RogerB wrote:
    Linda_Smith wrote: 
    I tested before and after the engineering work on my line, using the old hub and saw very little change - and virtually NO change in the key noise stats. I tested both on the test socket and on the normal setup. And the profile would not shift from its low level.
    I tested before and after connecting the new hub today, and saw a huge and immediate change, in both synch rates and profile, and noise levels - instantly the hub synched. And the profile came up dramatically within about two to three hours - this is the only thing that had moved it over the last week. And I tested the new hub immediately via both the test socket and the normal connection. So I don't agree with the last comment about CCSNR because I KNOW what the engineering work did to the CCSNR (and so did the engineer who checked it before he left and commented on it still being so high).
    Linda are you saying that after the new hub synched and gave you a better synch and profile ....  the noise margin was still running at a high level? ..... or did it reduce from previous levels ..... or stay the same??
    Trying to get an angle as to what's coming off with the 21cn upgrades, as clearly this is a common event all of a sudden.
    Before the line work/engineer visit,the engineer who phoned me (while we did various remote tests with hub in test societ) said, after we had done remote tests with the hub in the test socket - tell your visiting engineer this information from remote tests - "Loop Loss Line attenuation 23dB,  Profile from Exchange - 3dB downstream, SNR is high even using test socket."
    the v1 hub - prior to the line work - was giving these sort of stats
    (test socket)
    DSL Connection    Link Information - Uptime:    0 days, 0:02:01 - Modulation:    G.992.5 annex A
    Bandwidth (Up/Down) [kbps/kbps]:    735 / 4,091
    Data Transferred (Sent/Received) [KB/KB]:    23.00 / 25.00
    Output Power (Up/Down) [dBm]:    9.5 / 19.5
    Line Attenuation (Up/Down) [dB]:    11.0 / 23.0
    SN Margin (Up/Down) [dB]:    8.0 / 17.5
    Here are the stats AFTER the engineer line work and using the v1 hub (test socket) - and I'm sure nothing was done at the exchange whatsoever cos the engineers didn't go there. Everything stayed the same over the next day or so till I received the new hub and connected it. the up/down bandwidth has gone down - there is an "odd" result for output power of 0
    v1 hub again - test socket.
    DSL Connection    Link Information - Uptime:    0 days, 0:01:03 - Modulation:    G.992.5 annex A
    Bandwidth (Up/Down) [kbps/kbps]:    691 / 2,979
    Data Transferred (Sent/Received) [KB/KB]:    61.00 / 44.00
    Output Power (Up/Down) [dBm]:    9.5 / 0.0
    Line Attenuation (Up/Down) [dB]:    11.0 / 23.0
    SN Margin (Up/Down) [dB]:    10.0 / 21.5
    As you can see the synch and noise are not very different to what they were before the line work. This is still the v1 hub, but with everything from the cable connecting overhead cable to the NTE5 replaced with spanking new kit - new down cable, new NTE5, removed old GPO junction box. But as the visiting engineeer said - you still have a lot of noise.
    then my 2.0 hub arrived
    today I got this - v2 hub in test socket as soon as I unpacked it and once I had the wireless link sorted and could run a speed test on my desktop - everything else the same as the test above. Prior to fitting the hub there had been no dramatic rise in profile or synch on the old hub but I haven't recorded the results. This is the first 2.0 test.
    ADSL line status
    Connection information
    Line state    Connected
    Connection time    0 days, 0:35:23
    Downstream    13,399 Kbps
    Upstream    1,107 Kbps
    ADSL settings
    VPI/VCI    0/38
    Type    PPPoA
    Modulation    ITU-T G.992.5
    Latency type    Interleaved
    Noise margin (Down/Up)    3.0 dB / 5.8 dB
    Line attenuation (Down/Up)    25.0 dB / 11.5 dB
    Output power (Down/Up)    0.0 dBm / 12.5 dBm
    The profile at that point was still as it had been before, but then adjusted after about two hours and shot up from 2500 to 11000
    NB - remember that just to confuse us - the v1 stats and the v2 stats give up/down figures the opposite way round.
    I noticed that doing tests in the test socket with the v1 hub, very often it would fail to login to the internet (no internet light, no internet connection) even after synching and being left. A GUI restart didn't fix it, but a cold reboot seemed to make it login and the internet would connect again.
    I'm not arguing the techie explanations for all of this - but I was very careful recording all the stats and circumstances and exactly when they were done, and what had and hadn't been fixed. I'm not technically minded and know nothing about SNRs and attenuation - I will leave the discussions to the rest of you.
    All I can see is that the change of hub was what made the BIG difference and it was instant.
    My broadband secrets and tips

  • What version of Blackberry desktop manager is compatible with Mac OS 10.7 Lion

    What version of Blackberry desktop manager is compatible with Mac OS 10.7 Lion?

    I think you're going to have a problem with that.  http://forums.crackberry.com/mac-users-f62/desktop-manager-os-lion-624231/
    Try BlackBerry support  >  BlackBerry Support

  • What version of Adobe Photoshop Elements is compatible with OS 10.2.8?

    My nephew has inherited a power pc g3 running OS 10.2.8. The latest version of photoshop elements is not compatible with his system. I also know that Elements 2.0 needs a classic environment. I have been to the Apple Store and also contacted Adobe, as well as searched for specs on the web. Is anyone out there running photoshop elements in an environment similar to my nephew's? IF so, what version of Photoshop Elements are you using. Thanks.

    I use Photoshop 2.0 with both OS 9.x & OS 10.3.x. It operates from both OSs. See http://www.macworld.com/article/1651/2002/12/photoshop.html The requirements when 2.0 was released just says OS X. I'm sure it will work with 10.2.8. I got my copy at LEM-Swap. Suggest you join LEM-Swap for buying & selling Mac stuff. http://groups.google.com/group/lemswap
    After you join, post a WTB (want to buy).
     Cheers, Tom

  • How can I find an erlier version of the Netflix iPad app compatible with 1st generation iPads?

    I have 2 first generation iPads.  One has an early version of the Netflix app that is compatible with the ios, the other does not have the app.  When I try to download the app to the second iPad, I get nowhere becuse the only thing offered requires an ios that is beyond that supported by my iPad.  I can't find a work around and I am not offered the option to download early versions of the app. 

    I believe the prompt will only appear if you already have the old version installed and an update is presented, though I could be mistaken. Have you looked in the Purchases area of the App Store app when signed in using the account under which you downloaded the old version to see if the old version still appears there?
    If not, do you have the old version in iTunes on your computer, or if not is it still on that other iPad. If so, you should be able to get it into iTunes and from there sync it to the second iPad.
    Regards.

  • My imac 10.5 has now been upgraded to 10.5.8 what version of the latest firefox will  work with this ?

      to repeat the question i asked obove.    thank you for telling me how to upgrade my imac 10.5 to 10.5.8.  now i would like to know what version of firefox i should download for this ?

    Click here.
    (84721)

  • The Firefox checking system says that Shockwave Flash 10.1.82.76 (10.1.r82) is VULNERABLE and I should immediately update it. When updating I can find no higher version of Shockwave Flash that is compatible with my system. What should I do ?

    1. I have an eMac running Mac OS 10.5.8
    Processor Name: PowerPC G4 (3.3)
    Processor Speed: 1 GHz
    Number Of CPUs: 1
    L2 Cache (per CPU): 256 KB
    Memory: 1 GB
    Bus Speed: 133 MHz
    2. I use Firefox 3.6.24 as my browser
    3. The Firefox checking system says that the version of Shockwave Flash that I have installed, namely 10.1.82.76 (10.1.r82), presents a security VULNERABILITY and that I should immediately update it or disable it. On attempting to find an update I cannot locate a higher/more advanced version of Shockwave Flash that is compatible with my system. What should I do ?
    Thankyou for any assistance.

    The latest version for your system seems to be Flash 10.1 r102
    Flash Player 10.1 Release Notes: (latest version for Mac PPC)
    * http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/838/cpsid_83808.html
    See (Released 11/04/2010) Flash Player 10.1.102.64 and 9.0.289.0 (126 MB)
    * http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/142/tn_14266.html Archived Flash Player versions

  • "The version of this file is not compatible with the version of Windows you're running.[...]".What can I do?

    I must run a 32-bit programe  on a windows 64-bit operating sistem, and i receive this message:"The version of this file is not compatible with the version of Windows you're running.[...]". I tried with Troubleshoot compatibility - didn't
    work. I tried set to run in compatibility mode for Windows XP in file properties window and it didn't work.  What can I do more? I
    must run this programe to acces my database.

    Hello qqnicol,
    What program do you run?
    Please contact the software provider to confirm if this 32-bit program can run in 64-bit Windows.
    As some programs can only run in specific version of Windows, please download the right version of software.
    Most programs designed for the 32-bit version of Windows will work on the 64-bit version of Windows. Notable exceptions are many antivirus programs.
    Device drivers designed for the 32-bit version of Windows don't work on computers running a 64-bit version of Windows too.
    Best regards,
    Fangzhou CHEN
    Fangzhou CHEN
    TechNet Community Support

  • What version of the following programs (LasPass, Kaspersky anti Virus, Internet Download Manager) are compatible with Mozilla Firefox 15.0.1?

    what version of the following programs (LasPass, Kaspersky anti Virus, Internet Download Manager) are compatible with Mozilla Firefox 15.0.1?

    Lastpass 2.0.0, Kaspersky 2012, 2013 and Internet Download Manager 6.12 build 21 are fully compatible with Firefox 15. If you are having any issue, let us know :)

  • What is the earliest version of FCPS that will be compatible with the i-3 processor

    What is the earliest version of FCPS that will be compatible with the i-3 processor? I am looking for a used version and doesn't matter which one.

    FCP 5.1 was the first version compatible with Intel processor Macs.  After that came version 6 and the current version is 7.
    -DH

  • Help! After this morning's update installed, an error message appeared that read: "XUL Runner. Platform version '6.0.2 is not compatible with miniVersion =6.0.1 maxVersion =6.0.1" Now Firefox won't open or respond at all. What's the fix?

    Error dialogue box appeared:
    XUL Runner. Platform version '6.0.2 is not compatible with miniVersion>=6.0.1
    maxVersion<=6.0.1
    This happened a few minutes ago when I clicked on the Mozilla icon.

    If you use ZoneAlarm Extreme Security then try to disable Virtualization and do a clean reinstall.
    * http://kb.mozillazine.org/Browser_will_not_start_up#XULRunner_error_after_an_update
    See also:
    *[[/questions/869812]]
    *[[/questions/869951]]

  • I'm getting this error statement: XULRUNNER error: platform version 6.0.2 is not compatible with min etc max etc6.0.1 - what is this about and how can it be corrected?

    This is what I think may have happened. The other day, Thursday Sept 8th, I shut down my pc in the middle of a Firefox upgrade. Now when I try to access Firefox on my pc, I get this error message:
    XULRUNNER Error: Platform version '6.0.2 is not compatible with min Version >= 6.0.1 max Version < 6.0.1
    What is this about and how can I retsore access to Firefox on my pc?

    If you use ZoneAlarm Extreme Security then try to disable Virtualization.
    Do a clean reinstall and delete the Firefox program folder.
    * http://kb.mozillazine.org/Browser_will_not_start_up#XULRunner_error_after_an_update
    *[[/questions/869812]]
    *[[/questions/869951]]

  • Error :"The provider is not compatible with the version of Oracle client"

    Hi guys!
    I'm facing this problem:
    When my .Net application tries to access the DB, I get this error message above.
    The application is into the same machine of DB and the operational system is Windows Server Enterprise 64 bits.
    I'm comparing to another machine that has the same scenario but runs in Windows Vista 64 bits. This problem doesn't happen and I can normally access the DB.
    The both database versions are 10g Release 2 (10.2) and all components from Oracle Database Components 10.2.0.2.21 are installed as the containing bellow:
    -Oracle Data Provider for .NET 1.x 10.2.0.2.20
    -Oracle Data Provider for .NET 2.0 10.2.0.2.20
    -Oracle Developer Tools for Visual Studio .NET 2003 10.2.0.2.20
    -Oracle Developer Tools for Visual Studio 2005 10.2.0.2.20
    -Oracle Provider for OLE DB 10.2.0.2.20
    -Oracle Objects for OLE 10.2.0.2.20
    -Oracle Services For Microsoft Transaction Server 10.2.0.1.0
    -Oracle Net 10.2.0.1.0
    -Oracle Universal Installer 10.2.0.2.0
    Oracle.DataAcces.DLL is 2.102.2.20 and it is reference in my .Net app (that is published and located into IIS).
    These are the Oracle assemblies installes in 'C:\Windows\Assembly':
    Windows Vista Machine:
    ASSEMBLY NAME VERSION CULTURE PUBLIC KEY TOKEN PROCESS ARCHITECTURE
    Oracle.DataAccess 10.2.0.100 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
    Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
    Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 pt-BR 89b483f429c47342
    Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 it 89b483f429c47342
    Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 fr 89b483f429c47342
    Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 es 89b483f429c47342
    Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 de 89b483f429c47342
    Oracle.Management.Omo 2.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342 x86
    Oracle.VsDevTools 2.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342 x86
    Policy.10.1.Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
    Policy.10.2.Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
    Windows Server Machine:
    ASSEMBLY NAME VERSION CULTURE PUBLIC KEY TOKEN PROCESS ARCHITECTURE
    Oracle.DataAccess 10.2.0.100 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
    Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
    Oracle.DataAccess 2.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342 x86
    Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 pt-BR 89b483f429c47342
    Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 zh-CHT 89b483f429c47342
    Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 zh-CHS 89b483f429c47342
    Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 ko 89b483f429c47342
    Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 jp 89b483f429c47342
    Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 it 89b483f429c47342
    Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 fr 89b483f429c47342
    Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 es 89b483f429c47342
    Oracle.DataAccess.resources 10.2.0.100 de 89b483f429c47342
    Policy.10.1.Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
    Policy.10.2.Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
    Policy.9.2.Oracle.DataAccess 10.2.0.100 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
    Policy.9.2.Oracle.DataAccess 1.102.2.20 Neutral 89b483f429c47342
    What should I check and do to solve this problems?
    Thanks for help,
    Anderson

    Hi,
    Often the error "The provider is not compatible with the version of Oracle client" is raised when the unmanaged dll OraOpsX.dll can't be found, can't be loaded, or is the wrong version. For version 10.2.0.x of ODP.NET and .NET Framework 2.x the file should be called "OraOps10w.dll" and should be found in the %ORACLE_HOME%\bin directory.
    Since the ODAC pieces are installed on the same host as the database, are they in a separate Oracle Home or the same Oracle Home as the database software? If there are multiple Oracle Home directories, which one is in the system path first?
    I would start with verifying the version of OraOps10w.dll and the system path on the server. You might also confirm that the Oracle Home directory (and everything under it) has the following permissions for Authenticated Users:
    - Read & Execute
    - List folder contents
    - Read
    Regards,
    Mark

  • 'The provider is not compatible with the version of Oracle client' exceptio

    Hi
    I installed ODAC-11.1.0.7.10 Beta on my development system and developed a .net application which uses Oracle.DataAccess.dll to connect to Oracle10g database.
    the application is working fine, means opening connection successfully when I run it from my development system. but the same application is throwing
    'The provider is not compatible with the version of Oracle client' exception when I run it on my 10g database server system.
    what I need to do to run the application successfully on the machine where 10g server exists?
    any help is appreciated.
    thanks,
    harry

    Hi Harry,
    I am not sure why you installed 11.1.0.7.10 Beta as 11.1.0.7.20 has been released and you should not be using the beta at this time. That error message is because the dependencies being loaded by the process are the wrong version. When you deploy an ODP .NET application using 11.1.7.x, you need to make sure you deploy it to a machine where the 11.1.0.7.x dependencies are installed. My guess is if I read your poat correctly is that Oracle.DataAccess.dll version 11.1 is loaded but its finding 10.2 dependencies on the target deployment box.
    HTH
    Jenny

  • Could not complete your request because the file is not compatible with this version of photoshop

    Hello,
    I'm a beginner in PS. I was edit TIFF file in PS. Size of file is 21x89.1(22.6 MB). Then suddenly power - cuted. But after 5 min turn on PC and PS can't open my TIFF file.
    Error is (could not complete your request because the file is not compatible with this version of photoshop)
    What should I do, how I open this TIFF file? I realy need to open this file?
    Please help me...
    Regards, Suvd.S

    Out of curiosity, were you actually saving the file at the moment the power cut off, or had you just saved it?
    If not, I don't understand the reason the file should have become corrupted.  If it was successfully saved on disk from the prior save operation, just shutting off the power on Photoshop would lose your current edits, but the file should still be intact.
    -Noel

Maybe you are looking for