Which Cisco Access Point is Waterprof ? (outdoor:BR1300 + AIR-ANT24120)

hi,
My questions to the community :
i have to choose for a customer some 50 Access points but that must have an external antennas with at least 8 dbi as gain and to be waterprof
for me the BR1300 + AIR-ANT24120 is a good choice if the BR1300 is Waterproof (For me :normaly all Cisco Access Point Outdoor must be WaterProof : but i want to have a confirmation with a document if possible )
and it's interessant to knew ,which Cisco Access Point is Waterproof ?
Think you All !
Zammit Ikbel

the 1310 is going to be waterproof, as is the 15xx product line, (152x and 155x). All this can be found in the data sheet for the AP.
That being said, you can also put any of the external AP into a NEMA enclosure, and have it be waterproofed, so long as the enclosure is rated as such.
HTH,
Steve

Similar Messages

Configuring Cisco Access Points 1602i Air-SAP-1602I-Z-K9

Hi everyone,
I am having touble configuring cisco access points 1602i. I have configured them and they are broadcasting SSID and clients are able to connect to them, but the only thing which is troublesome is speed. I have 100Mbps bandwidth speed but at access point I am getting speed between 17 to 25. Can anyone please tell me where I am gone wrong.
I have Juniper Srx210 configured as backbone for providing internet on fiber. Then further I have attached one POE switch (managable). From that switch I have attached 4 access points.
One more thing,two ports of Juniper is configured as Vlans, one for staff and one for students. I have attached this POE switch to Student Vlan, but haven't configured ports of POE switch as trunk. Please tell me do I have to configure ports as trunk on POE Switch. Is this the cause of slow bandwidth over access points.
I am also planning to go for Wlan Controller to manage Access points. When I contact my supplier about it, told me the following:
"You just need to convert the Access points to autonomous mode. Here are some details, there is no additional charge."
https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/3889653
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/access_point/conversion/lwapp/upgrade/guide/lwapnote.html#wp160918
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQ_NuxdRhQ4
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-14960
I looked at the links but couldn't understand properly. Then I searched over the internet and found out that
"a cisco autonomous access point basically runs on its own while a lightweight access point uses a centralized device called a wireless lan controller to get its configuration. autonomous access points are managed individually, while the lightweight access points can be managed centrally. also, the switchport configurations to support both types of access points will differ. "
I didn't understand, why he suggested to go for Wlan controller and to upgrade access points to autonomous mode, when according to above finding, it says that autonomous access points runs individually.
Please advice.
I shall be thankfull

Hello Scott and Leo,
Thanks for all your help.
I have managed to install and configure 4 Access points and Now Access points are giving speed between 25 to 45Mbps. Still not enought but it sloving the purpose. Everyone is enjoying their face book. I will soon get the Cisco Wlan Controller as well. I dont know if there is a way to get more speed from these access points. I am ready to buy more equipments if required.
Anyway, today I need your guys expretise once again. As you know Junipr Srx 210 is configured for fiber internet to provide internet services to school. Now we are changing the building and transfering the line to new building. This time I want to use Cisco router in place of Juniper Srx210. But I need to know what model will support the current configuration for fiber. Would you please tell me what model/series router will be suitable for fiber internet and for implementing other restrictions.
I am attaching a picture of current jiniper Srx 210 for your consideration.
I shall be very thankfull to you
Sarabjit

Cisco Access point management vlan

Hi All,
I have all my switches configured to run on native vlan 500 and management on vlan 10
with the cisco access point , if I make 500 native or another word trunk untagged vlan then I can't access the router using the BVI interface which is meant to have ip from vlan 10.
vlan 10 is the management network across our business and all management ips are on that range.
what are the possible solutions?

When you connect the access point to the wired LAN, the access point links to the network using a bridge virtual interface (BVI) that it creates automatically. Instead of tracking separate IP addresses for the access point's Ethernet and radio ports, the network uses the BVI.
When you assign an IP address to the access point using the CLI, you must assign the address to the BVI. Beginning in privileged EXEC mode, follow these steps to assign an IP address to the access point's BVI:
Step 1
configure terminal
Enter global configuration mode.
Step 2
interface bvi1
Enter interface configuration mode for the BVI.
Step 3
ip address address
mask
Assign an IP address and address mask to the BVI. Note If you are connected to the access point using a Telnet session, you lose your connection to the access point when you assign a new IP address to the BVI. If you need to continue configuring the access point using Telnet, use the new IP address to open another Telnet session to the access point.

Is there any way I can control which specific access point I connect (and stay connected) to from amongst a set of access points with the same SSID?

I'm working from a boat in a harbor in which the ISP has deployed numerous access points around the periphery. All the access points share the same SSID and each is configured to use either channel 1, 6 or 11. From my location, there are over a dozen of these access points "visible" (based on the the output of WiFi Scanner) with a range of RSSI and S/N values that vary over time.
The ISP has told me that the quality of my connection should be "perfectly fine" for any access point with an RSSI value better than -75, but I know from experience that my connection quality is miserable (i.e. < 50Kbps download) for almost all of these, including those with RSSI values better than -75. There is at least one exception, however, which gives me on the order of 2Mbps download, which is "great" in this context.
I've tried using a more powerful USB antenna plugged into my MacBook Air (mid 2011), but as far as I can tell, it really doesn't make much difference. Neither does my location within the boat. The overriding factor seems to be which access point I happen to connect up to.
I should point out that the closest access points are about 75 yards away, with many of them being several hundred yards away or more. I'm guessing that even though the signal strength of some of the distant access points is causing them to get "chosen" some times, the results are unacceptable due to the distance.
I'm hoping that I can determine, through experimentation, which access point(s) provide(s) acceptable performance and then configure my Mac to limit my connection to those points through whatever mechanism I need to use (e.g. channel, MAC id, etc.).

Establishing a wireless connection with a client computer is left to the access point for various reasons. One reason that your Mac may not connect to the strongest access point is that it may have reached a limit of the number of clients it can serve, leaving it unable to accept a connection with another. The limit may not be very large.
Suppose that happens, and your Mac establishes a connection with a more distant access point having a weaker signal. Then, suppose a client drops off the network. Doesn't this mean your Mac will switch to the stronger access point? Not necessarily. The throughput delivered to and from your Mac would have to drop below a threshold specified in the AP for it to drop the client, leaving your Mac free to connect with another one. The reason for this is to prevent rapid switching from one AP to another in an area in which two signals are of approximately equal quality. If that were to occur the frequent and repetitive handshaking between the two devices would slow throughput to zero.
In an environment in which several access points are broadcasting the same SSID, Apple provides no insight as to how it determines which access point to choose. This is the reason I suspect this "choice" is a function of the router, or access point. The connection originates with it, not the Mac.
Now, what would solve your dilemma would be to determine a way to control the access point with which your Mac connects, by specifying the access point's unique MAC address for example. In this happy circumstance, you could maintain an editable "whitelist" or "blacklist" of the harbor's access points and be able to choose which among them you prefer.
I do not believe OS X maintains such a record of MAC addresses though, only those of the routers it uses. If I am correct about that, such a solution is unlikely to exist. Don't let that discourage you from searching for one though... I would concentrate on something like "selecting access point by specific MAC address".
I did find this patent application though:
Roaming Network Stations Using A Mac Address Identifier To Select New Access Point
Perhaps it's a start

Can cisco MSE(mobility service engine) configured to work with non-cisco access points?

I understand that access points can be configured to forwards all the probe requests to cisco wifi controller. cisco MSE(mobility service engine) gets the probes from wifi controller to find the location of the mobile devices.
My question, can cisco MSE(mobility service engine) be configured to work with non-cisco access points?

No and the reason why is the NMSP communication from the MSE to the WLC. Other vendors don't support this so there is no communication happening.
-Scott

Blackberry Z10 connection with an Aironet Cisco Access Point 1200

Hi everybody,
I'm trying without success a connection between a Blackberry Z10 and an Aironet Cisco Access Point 1200.
We have no BB Server, we would like just to connect the WIFI.
I've checked this points during the activation of the device:
There's no LEAP protocolle.
There's an EAP-Fast possibility.
There's Mac Address recognition possibility.
When we try to use the EAP-Fast possibility, we generate a .pac file, but i don't know where i can put this file so that the Blackberry recognize this file. I've search the whole day and didn't find anything... there's simply no explanation with the Z10 around the .pac file without a BB Server.
I've try the Mac Address recognition and it simply doesn't work (no error the search time is too long)
Every other older smartphones - Blackberry (there's 4 devices) are working.
Anyone have an idea about? a suggestion? a list of compatible WIFI Devices?
Thank you ahead.
Have a nice day.
Joel.

Sorry i don't understand your answer.
I'm not a developper but a system administrator.
I just would like to use a Balckberry Z10 with our Wifi/Router Aironet Access Point 1200.
not more.
Best regards,
Joel

PPPoE on Cisco Access Point

Hi, Im looking for possibility to configure Cisco Access Points for PPPoE and VPDN anybody knows pls reply to [email protected] tks

I think it is possible to configure AP to fucntion over PPPOE. But since AP is just a layer2 device, we also need a layer 3 device like router to support PPPOE. Without layer 3 device, it is not possible.

AP1262 bridge to Non-Cisco Access Point?

I would like to use a Cisco AP1262 in a mobile command vehicle to bridge to any WiFi Access Point that I know the SSID and Pasword to. Will the 1262 Bridge to a Non-Cisco Access Point?
If so, any assistance in finding an example configuration would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Brian

Hi Brian,
Yes, you can configure 1262 as Universal Workgroup bridge where it will associate to any cisco or non-cisco root AP. You can only connect one wired client behind universal WGB.
You just need to configure "station-role workgroup-bridge universal <wired_client_MAC>" under radio interface of WGB. (1262)
Something similar should work for your 1262, if you want it in 5GHz, otherwise configure radio 0 interface for WGB
hostname WGB
dot11 ssid <SSID-NAME>
authentication open
authentication key-management wpa version 2
wpa-psk ascii <PASSWORD>
interface Dot11Radio1
encryption mode ciphers aes-ccm
station-role workgroup-bridge universal 068d.098a.d422 <- Ur wired MAC
ssid <SSID-NAME>
bridge-group 1
interface GigabitEthernet0
bridge-group 1
NB: I haven't tested this, so you have to test & confirm. If WPA2/AES is not supported then you may need to choose suitable security protocol & encryption mechanism.
HTH
Rasika
*** Pls rate all useful responses ****

Cisco Access Points Rebooting

Has anyone experienced a Cisco Access Point reboot itself, on it's own?

7 out of 17 are rebooting... but it's not isolated to one IDF it's different spots within the building.i will check the log in flash.
Hmmmmm ... And if you do a "sh version" to everyone of them it comes up saying something like "by power-on"?
If this is the case, you may also want to consider the copper cables between your Injector and your AP.

PPPoE and VPDN config. in Cisco Access Points

Hi, Im looking for possibility to configure Cisco Access Points for PPPoE and VPDN anybody knows pls reply to [email protected] tks

I can only comment on the wireless voice side. Phones will be setting the Qos (Cos and ip precedence) you will need all the devices in the network to understand these QoS and act apropiately, prioritizing voice over other data.
If you can't guaratee that all devices that the voice will cross will maintain those Cos/dscp settings and will prioritize the voice, you can't guarantee how the voice quality would be.

Third Party Signal Repeaters/Wireless Extenders for Boosting Cisco Access Points Indoors

We are have some buildings that have access points (Cisco 2602e with 6dBi Terrawave omni antennas) in the hallways, in which the clients residing in rooms aren't receiving a strong enough signal to connect at suitable rates. The main reason for this is the large thick doors utilized for the client rooms reducing the strength of the signal, and we weren't authorized to place APs inside the rooms. Nor are we able to modify the structure of the building, such as changing the doors. We can't ask or expect the clients to keep their doors open to rcv a stronger signal. I've tweaked the Tx power for the APs, and lowered the mandatory rates on the WLC for this location under the RF profile created for it, but this isn't resolving the issue with the weak signal.
One band aid solution idea was to place signal repeaters (low profile) inside each room, behind the wall/door area facing the hallway. I've seen a few third party products online, but they seem to only come in support of the 2.4GHz band. If this is a feasible solution, then it looks like we wouldn't be able to support clients on the 5GHz band on our AP, as clients would most likely connect to the 2.4 GHz band due to a stronger signal, limiting our load balancing on the AP. Anyone have experience with using signal repeaters that work properly with Cisco APs.
Not the ideal situation, but have the hands strapped on what we can do.

If you've got a WLC, then disable TPC and crank up the power to full.

Cisco access point 1240g showing conf ter is invalid command

hai friends
i bought one cisco ap 1240g.
but while i am typing to conf ter in enabled mode invalid command.
and i put sh run
it showing only one fastethernet interface and there is no bvi interface on that.
and full it is showing related to the certificate commands.
plz help me in this
thanks

Hi Cyril,
The problem here is that the AP that you received is an LWAPP or Lightweight AP which will only work with the WLC/Unified solution. This is referenced in your first show-ver by these comments;
AIR-LAP1242AG-E-K9
LWAPP Image Version 3.0.51.0
You will need to convert the AP back to Autonomous mode.This is most possible
Here is the related info :)
Using a TFTP Server to Return to a Previous Release
Note This section does not apply to Cisco C3201WMIC and Cisco C3201LAP.
Follow these steps to revert from LWAPP mode to autonomous mode by loading a Cisco IOS release using a TFTP server:
Step 1 The static IP address of the PC on which your TFTP server software runs should be between 10.0.0.2 and 10.0.0.30.
Step 2 Make sure that the PC contains the access point image file (such as c1200-k9w7-tar.122-15.JA.tar for a 1200 series access point) in the TFTP server folder and that the TFTP server is activated.
Step 3 On the PC where the TFTP server is located, perform these steps:
a. Disable any software firewall products, such as Windows firewall, ZoneAlarm firewall, McAffee firewall, or others.
b. Ensure all Windows files are visible. From Windows Explorer, click Tools > Folder Options > View > Show hidden files and folders.
Step 4 Rename the access point image file in the TFTP server folder to c1200-k9w7-tar.default for a 1200 series access point, c1130-k9w7-tar.default for an 1130 series access point, c1240-k9w7-tar.default for a 1240 series access point, and c1250-k9w7-tar.default for a 1250 series access point.
Step 5 Connect the PC to the access point using a Category 5 (CAT5) Ethernet cable.
Step 6 Disconnect power from the access point.
Step 7 Press and hold MODE while you reconnect power to the access point.
Step 8 Hold the MODE button until the status LED turns red (approximately 20 to 30 seconds) and then release.
Step 9 Wait until the access point reboots, as indicated by all LEDs turning green followed by the Status LED blinking green.
Step 10 After the access point reboots, reconfigure it using the GUI or the CLI.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/access_point/conversion/lwapp/upgrade/guide/lwapnote.html#wp161272
Hope this helps!
Rob

No of client supported per radio on Cisco Access Points?

Hi Experts,
Is their any documentation that lists out the number of clients that can be handled efficiently per radio against a particular model of access points?
The question might appear quite ambiguos considering the fact that the wireless communication works on the principal of air time and shared medium. However still curious to know if latest model of access points make the enhancement any better.
Learnt quite some time back that 1262 WAP supports 15 clients per radio while 3700 would easily do with over 128 client per radio. Not sure on what basis we distinguish this?
Appreciate if someone could share their knowledge on same. Would be grateful if we a pointer to any doc is shown as well giving the comparision.
Thanks and Regards,
Adnan

Hello Scott,
Glad to see your response.
Does this rule of thumb(of 25 APs per radio) applies to all the access points models?
Little confused from document( http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/wireless/buyers-guide.html#~indoor ) which lists different client count values against different models. Suppose we are having 600 series of WAP, the doc says it has client count value of 15. So I made my own conclusion that only 15 clients active association is possible at any given instant in time and if the 16th client tries association, it will fail and would be able to succeed only when the already associated client count goes a little under 15.
Can you please throw some light on the document claims?
Thanks,
Muhammed Adnan

Setting up wireless Cisco Access Points independently and network layout

Hello,
I am technician in a school. I have been asked to upgrade wireless system in school. Currently I am using VDSL2 30Mbps line. I am using E4200 Router, which is providing internet services. The school has 3 floors. On one floor I have this router which is further attached with 16 port gigabit unmanageable switch. The same router is providing wireless service on the same floor using Class C ip address. From the switch I have extended a cable and took it on to another (second floor), where I have got one more gigabit switch. From that switch I have connected one router using different subnet and further i have attached two access points for the entire floor, which is working ok. From the same switch I have extended one more cable up to third floor where I have connected one more access point. So, 3 access points on three floors, 2 switches and two router. This is the current network layout.
Now school have decided to go over to fiber. ISP is going to put Juniper router and going to create vlan and will configure access restrictions. School will have 100Mbps unlimited up and download speed. Its because of increase in number of students. School is still waiting for the router and configuration to be done.
I have got 4 cisco 1602i access points (AIR-SAP1602I-Z-K9). These access points are POE supported. I have got one 8 port POE switch also. When I got these 4 cisco I didnt get power adapters with them. First I want to ask, is this normal. Don't they usually come with power adapter. I know they are POE, but cisco doesn't send them with power adapters.
Second I want to ask, if these access points can work independent without WLAN controller. Or do i have to have WLAN controller.
As fiber is not up yet so, for the time being I have connected these access points with POE switch using Cat5E cable and then further connected the POE switch with normal gigabit switch, which is further conneted with router at this point.
Please tell me if I am doing it correctely. I will also be needing help with the configuration.
Can anyone tell me how to setup these access points independently for current situation to provide internet access. How to set them on different channels etc......
Also want to know if there is any software that can detect access points and can help me manage these access points.
I shall be thankful.
Sarab

DUPLICATE POST
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

Cisco Access Point (WiFi)

Hi,
i am searching for a Cisco AP (wifi) which will support atleast 100 concurrent connections .
Please advice.
Thanks,
Saroj

Please don't take any offense with my response.
Your question is similar to the question "What 24-port switch model can support 200 clients."
An AP can support between 1 to 1024 clients (theoretical). But understand that a wireless access point (WAP) behaves like a hub: When one talks, everyone else stops to listen and waits for their turn.
Cisco recommends that no more than 25-clients-per-WAP ratio. So if you have 200 clients then you need a minimum of 8 APs. Depending on your other environmental factors (such as size of the areas, walls, height of the AP to be installed, etc.) you may have to consider disabling the 802.11b data rates.
Next question is what model. Well that's going to be difficult without knowing what your budget and requirement is. But I will presume that you will need 802.11n support so here goes:
1. Go to the Cisco wireless website (link).
2. The 1040 is the most affordable WAP. The main difference with the rest is that this model support 2 x 2 MIMO while the others will support 2 x 3 MIMO.
3. The WAP models 1250 and 1260 are industrial grade models and require external antenna. The 3500e requires external antenna too but can support up to -6 dBm gain. The 3500p also requires external antenna but has it's own special antenna. This model is designed for stadium installation.
4. For optimum performance, the 1250 requires a 20.0 PoE or PWR-INJ4 power brick. Other APs requires 15.4w PoE.
5. The 3500i/3500e/3500p is the only model of it's kind to support Cisco's CleanAir. This model requires a Wireless LAN Controller (WLC).
6. 1140 is the baseline WAP.
7. The 1040, 1140, 1250, 1260 and 3500i/3500e/3500p has GigabitEthernet wired interface.
The 1130 is an AP that will only support 802.11a/b and g.

Which Cisco Access Point is Waterprof ? (outdoor:BR1300 + AIR-ANT24120)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for