Which macbook pro should i buy?

I am looking at buying a new macbook after 6 years with my current one which is running really slow. I will be using the macbook pro with the retina display 13 inch to -
1. Add photos and videos as well as edit them as well possibly by using adobe photo shop
2. Surf the internet
3. Update my blog
4. Basic Web design
Which macbook pro should i buy for the tasks that i plan to do??
The 256GB with the i5 processor and buy a 1TB external hard drive
or 256GB with the i7 processor and buy an external hard drive
or go max out at buy the 512GB with the i7 processor

Consider this option.
lknights1987 wrote:
or go max out at buy the 512GB with the i7 processor
Best.

Similar Messages

  • Which macbook pro should I buy?? 13 or 15??

    I am planning to buy a macbook pro but I don't know which macbook pro I should buy.
    Games are not that important to me, however I play games such as call of duty, nba 2k, need for speed sometimes. Portability is important to me because it is compulsory for bringing laptops to school. I am confused on buying which macbook pro because the gpu of 13 is bad but 15 might be too big and heavy.
    So which macbook pro should I buy?

    Hi Lawrence,
    You've point out some of the important factors. For me, the choice would be easy. I'd gladly put up with a bit more bulk/weight to have a 15" display. ymmv

  • Which macbook pro should i buy if i use finalcut7?the i5 or i7?

    which macbook pro should i buy if i use finalcut7?the i5 or i7?

    Either one will do the job.  The more powerful the CPU, the faster it will perform.  I suggest that if the budget is tight, go for the i5, if not go for what the bank account will allow.
    It is nice to have a fast CPU, but they are not essential to the overwhelming applications that most people use, especially in a non-vocational context.  On this forum there are the 'speed freaks' who will tout the virtues of faster CPUs, yet most have never compared two MBPs side by side and experienced the differences of real world results.
    Ciao.

  • Which Macbook Pro should i buy, 13" or 15" SSD or HDD or flash drive?

    I'm a Graphic Designer, and looking to buy a new Mac. Believe it or not, i've been using a Powerbook G4 for more than 10 years, the best of its kind, until recently the Hard drive died and the OS on the computer can't be upgraded any more. I can still use Adobe CS3 on it. Its an awesome device but hard to part with. The exterior is in great shape, looks almost new.
    I've heard a lot of negatives on the newer Mac Book Pros, it's battery life, etc. Are there any Graphic Designers that can help with reviews and experiences using the new ones. I don't care so much for the Retina display, recently Apple made it available for most all except one option and the price jump stinks.
    I'm actually considering the 13" macbook pro w/o Retina that way i can upgrade the RAM and HD. I will be using Adobe CC on the macbook pro once i buy it.
    Can anyone suggest a better configuration, is 13" sufficient?, which should i choose SSD or Flash drive. I would like to keep the budget somewhere between $1500-$1750. Also do people recommend taking Apple care?
    Thanks any advise is much appreciated.
    CR

    You will love the new mac's. An SSD is 2-3x faster than an HDD when it comes to startup and loading apps. SSD and flash drive is the same thing, flash drive is just a faster SSD.
    I would say you could go with the non-retina mac's but you are doing graphic design after all, and a retina display has much better graphics. The retina display also weighs a whole pound lighter which is a very noticable difference.
    The battery life is very good. The 13" processor should be powerful enough for everything you need. The 15" will be at least $2,000 which would not fit your budget.
    I would go for the mid model 13" with 8GB ram and 256GB space. It will be around $1,399 + tax with the education discount. You will be fine with 8GB ram as the new OS is very efficient when it comes to memory management.
    http://store.apple.com/us/buy-mac/macbook-pro

  • Which macbook pro should i buy for architecture/interior design?

    My question is about the 13" or the 15" pro. My wife is starting out in architecture/interior design and she already knows she'll be using photoshop cs3, Rhino and auto cad. Her concern is the weight of the unit and the price and is therefore leaning towards the 13". But I've been pushing her to the high end 15" because of the better video card and processor.
    All said and done is the extra $1000 worth it, considering she'll be using it for the next 4 years? She is the careful one with the money, so I need a better way to rationalize the extra $1000 for the 15" than just saying that its "better". As far as she's concerned, I'm just buying into the apple occult over the best shiny new thing!
    Another question concerns whether, if she can make it through first term without a computer, we should wait until the next refresh. My friend told me that macbook pros might become like the mac airs. If that's the case it'd really solve our weight problems.
    Thanks!

    The AIR is the way it is because it's stripped down and has lousy integrated graphics where the CPU handles it, thus they overheat. A Windows PC laptop would be the same and a lot leas expensive (although not as thin), dragging the external optical drive around is a real pain too.
    Your correct about the 15" for the software she needs to run, namely Photoshop and AutoCad, and likely VMFusion and Windows too.
    I would get the 2.2 Ghz 15" MacBook Pro and the anti-glare high resolution screen, the glare of the glossy screens makes it unsuitable for most professional uses.
    Don't go by my word 100%, just read the posts from professionals here
    https://macmatte.wordpress.com/
    and the general computing public here.
    http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2011/05/23/glossy-vs-matte-screens-why-the-pc-indus trys-out-of-touch/
    The 15" and 17" MBP are the only anti-glare screen computers Apple still makes, so grab a powerful 2.2 Ghz while they still sell them and make it last as long as possible
    That would make the lowest annaul cost of ownership possible, as the software wouldn't need to be replaced as soon, the softwares combined is likely to cost more than the machine.
    The AIR is nice, if she used it as a consumer computer, but she's got "Pro" intentions and the AIR, the 13" and the 2.0 Ghz 15" doesn't cut it, especially in the graphics/3D rendering which AutoCAD is sorely needed a strong video card to render fast.
    Some get a/iPad for light portable uses and the MaBook Pro for the heavy lifting, that could be a option for a extra $500,
    Good Luck.

  • Architecture student, Which MacBook Pro should I buy?

    I want to buy a macbook pro, i'm going to study architecture, but I don't know which model is the best one to run AutoCad and other architecture programs.
    I think I need a i7 chip, but I don't know if the 13-inch MBP i7 dual-core 8gb Ram or 15-inch MBP i7 Quad-core 4Gb Ram, what do you think?

    Well I got the MBP 13" 2.9 GHz. I weighed all the options the price differences and pros and cons. I'm am very happy with my dission.
    The Retina was way out of price range for what you get. The ability to no upgrade unit was a huge turnoff. And to buy it fully loaded was not even worth it. I don't have that kinda dough to throw around, and I think it highly over rated. It's new and has a wow factor, but does not make sense. Millions of great photos connived and edited before retina display, so to say its needed or worth it at that price is not logical for me.
    The 15" was a close to me, but $700 difference out of pocket still was not sure for me after selling my old MPB. portability was issue, and if my old 13" MBP did my editing ok in PS CS5 and Lightroom 4 then the new 13" should be no problem.
    What I got:
    I got MBP 13" 2.9MHz i7. I figured it have a better resale value in long run over the 2.3MHz i5.
    the size is perfect as I travel all the time. I'm a pilot full time so it fits in my camera bag perfect.
    I added my already owned 256GB SSD drive in it, and upgraded to 16GB RAM for $110. It's amazing fast. 4 sec open PS CS6.
    I have been using it to edit my photos in LTR4 and PS CS6, no problem and fast. In the 14 days owned I have not even opened the cover of my laptop, it's always been used on external 27" display. So money saved I upgraded my gear New CF Cards, USB 3.0 HUB, USB 3.0 Card Reader, USB 3.0 External Hadrive.  Still money saved, cause I sold all my old USB and Drives and Cardsbon EBay too.  The USB 3.0 was main reason I upgraded, it's worth it to. 3.0 makes a differencebandni can see the transfer speed differences. So much faster.
    So theres my reasons for doing what I did.

  • Which Macbook Pro should I buy for recording, making music and editing videos?

    I really have a huge interest in music and editing videos and I want to make it as a part of my career so I want to start making some videos/music videos, etc. I have an iMac, but I share with my whole family, so I don't really have the time and I don't have the privacy that I need. I was thinking about buying a PC but that gets viruses easily unlike the Mac OS. I really hope someone could help me. I was thinking about the 13 inch Macbook Pro with Retina display (8GB Memory and 500+ Flash Storage). That's what I could afford right now.
    Thanks.

    Based on reports here and elsewhere, I'm not sure buying a Retina MBP is such a great investment of your money as Retina Displays make much higher demands on the systems... and provide a lower overall performance with CPU/Sub Systems intensive and timing reliant/critical applications such as Logic Pro X
    While I understand the 'draw' of Laptops.. because of their portability etc... there are drawbacks that should be taken into account too.. and compared to a similar priced iMac/Mac Mini.... you get much better power/cost ration with an iMac/Mac Mini than you will ever get with a MBP....
    Simply put you will spend roughly twice as much for a MBP compared to an iMac/Mac Mini to obtain the same performance... and while Retina does provide for a very good clear screen... the overheads that places on the systems of a MBP.. can often outweigh its real benefits when used with an App like LPX where Retina really serves no useful purpose/benefits....... especially for the extra cost.
    Example..My nearly 3 year old 3.4Ghz i7 32GB iMac which cost less by some degree as my top of the range 2013 2.5 Ghz i7 16GB MBP with Retina..  'smokes' the MBP so easily..... when using identical versions of LPX/LP9 under Mavericks.. Even my 2010 Mac Mini Server 2.0 Ghz 16GB gives the MBP a good run for it's money in comparision.. and that cost me less than $800 plus Monitor!
    Note: This is just a personal opinion and should be viewed as such....

  • Which Macbook Pro should I buy: Refurbished Oct 2012 13.3" model with Retina display or the 2013 version?

    I am a average user, watch a lot of movies, play music, word processing, lots of internet browsing etc.
    I am currently considering the following:
    Refurbished 13.3-inch MacBook Pro 2.6GHz Dual-core Intel i5 with Retina Display
    Originally released October 2013
    13.3-inch (diagonal) Retina display; 2560-by-1600 resolution at 227 pixels per inch
    8GB of 1600MHz DDR3L SDRAM
    512GB Flash Storage1
    720p FaceTime HD camera
    Intel Iris Graphics
    OR
    Refurbished 13.3-inch MacBook Pro 2.9GHz Dual-core Intel Core i7 with Retina Display
    Originally released October 2012
    13.3-inch (diagonal) Retina display; 2560-by-1600 resolution at 227 pixels per inch
    8GB of 1600MHz DDR3L SDRAM
    512GB Flash Storage
    720p FaceTime HD Camera
    Intel HD Graphics 4000
    They are both roughly the same price.

    I would tend to opt for the newer one.  Even though the CPU specs suggest that the 2012 is faster, from a practical perspective you will be hard pressed to notice the difference in 'real' world conditions.
    Ciao.

  • Which Macbook pro should I buy for recording and producing music??

    So I should probably start by saying I don't know too much about computers. I just know I want something fast and dependable, that will let me record, mix, surf the internet, all without having to worry about speed and performance.
    I'm considering buying the 15 inch 2.2GHz retina model and I'm wondering if that would be good enough.
    For the most part, I'll be doing the typical "record the band" dealio...      Tracking and mixing drums, bass, guitars, vox, you know..  
    I'm definitely planning on getting an external hard drive to keep the space on my laptop free. Again, I'm kinda dumb when it comes to computer terms, so I'm just hoping someone can shed some light on the situation for me.
    Thanks for reading!   
    Chad

    Based on reports here and elsewhere, I'm not sure buying a Retina MBP is such a great investment of your money as Retina Displays make much higher demands on the systems... and provide a lower overall performance with CPU/Sub Systems intensive and timing reliant/critical applications such as Logic Pro X
    While I understand the 'draw' of Laptops.. because of their portability etc... there are drawbacks that should be taken into account too.. and compared to a similar priced iMac/Mac Mini.... you get much better power/cost ration with an iMac/Mac Mini than you will ever get with a MBP....
    Simply put you will spend roughly twice as much for a MBP compared to an iMac/Mac Mini to obtain the same performance... and while Retina does provide for a very good clear screen... the overheads that places on the systems of a MBP.. can often outweigh its real benefits when used with an App like LPX where Retina really serves no useful purpose/benefits....... especially for the extra cost.
    Example..My nearly 3 year old 3.4Ghz i7 32GB iMac which cost less by some degree as my top of the range 2013 2.5 Ghz i7 16GB MBP with Retina..  'smokes' the MBP so easily..... when using identical versions of LPX/LP9 under Mavericks.. Even my 2010 Mac Mini Server 2.0 Ghz 16GB gives the MBP a good run for it's money in comparision.. and that cost me less than $800 plus Monitor!
    Note: This is just a personal opinion and should be viewed as such....

  • Which new MacBook Pro should I buy?

    I am currently running a mid 2009 MacBook Pro with 4 GB of memory and 2.8 GHz processor.  I run Parallels and a GIS system.  It is now running like a dog, although I realise I need to do a bit of cleaning up.  However the GIS is getting bigger and I have the opportunity to upgrade.  I need to be portable and as light as possible.  Is a thunderbolt drive going to be of any help.
    Your input much appreciated.

    I have a mid-2009 MacBook Pro with the 2.66 GHz processor and run parallels on it and use it for application development. I've upgraded mine to have maxed out RAM of 8GB, upgraded the internal drive to 1TB and, best of all, replaced the never used DVD drive with a OWC data doubler holding an OWC 240GB 3G SSD as my boot drive. The computer is very fast indeed, I am very pleased with this setup. As long as you are not CPU bound in your tasks, adding an SSD drive and maxing RAM can cheaply (compared to a new Mac) extend the useful life of a machine.

  • Which Macbook Pro should I purchase? I'm thinking the non-Retina 13" with 2.9GHZ and 128GB SSD...

    I am looking to purchase a new laptop in the near future but I am not sure which configurations--specifically relating to speed and memory--I should choose. As of now I am thinking about this:
    13" non Retina Macbook Pro
    2.9GHz Dual-core Intel Core i7, Turbo Boost up to 3.6GHz
    8GB 1600MHz DDR3 SDRAM — 2x4GB
    128GB Solid State Drive
    SuperDrive 8x (DVD±R DL/DVD±RW/CD-RW)
    Backlit Keyboard (English) & User's Guide
    the total cost for this package is $1,599 which is just about my total budget-- it don't want to go over $1,800.
    At this point, I have sort of ruled out the Retina display because I'm not really sure if it is worth it. Instead, I would like to buy a Macbook Pro that is very fast, durable, and spacious (in terms of memory).
    In the past, I have opted for the standard specs but I have learned the hard way that configurations matter.
    I plan to use this laptop for my last two years of college in hopes that it will last me at least 3 years after that (My current Macbook is in its 5th year but has seen two different hard drives....). I have a large music collection (100 gigs or so) stored on a variety of different drives as well as some movies that I would love to (for the first time since I downloaded Napster) have on the same device without losing computing power or processing speed. Also I am a beginner/intermediate programmer who likes to spend very extended time periods jumping between programs and just messing around on the Internet (but honestly, who doesn't? haha).
    One thing I'm not entirely sure about is the eminent release of Mountain Lion OS X. Should I be waiting for this to be the standard on all laptops or does it not matter all the much?
    If anyone has any suggestions, I'm all ears...

    Hey Mitch,
    i've had the same decission, the same budget and the Mac was for the same purposes (a little bit of coding and the rest just for normal work at university). So what do you think i ordered yesterday? Exactly the same configuration you posted above! Why? The Retina Macbook Pro was too expensive, the other 15'' models haven't got SSDs and when you choose the buy to order option with SSD you can just go and buy the Retina Macbook. So there's only the 13'' MacBook Pro left (if you want a Macbook Pro - i wanted one because the configuration of an MB Air with the 1,8GHz Prozessor and 8GB of Ram is more expansive than the Macbook pro Configuration you posted above, plus u have less of processor power. And i don't mind carrying around 800g more, for mobile working i have an iPad). Then i had to go with the i7 MBP because on the long runs you will definetly need his power. And in a few years you would regret if you chose less power.... and SSD is a must have just like 8GB of ram.
    And when you think about the future you always have the possibilty to upgrade your Mac to 16gb of ram or to an 512 gb ssd (when they are cheaper :P) cause the "thick" macbooks have those parts not directly on the mainboard so that they can be changed by yourself in just a few minutes. And if your missing a dedicated graphic card the future will bring thunderbold graphic cards.
    For OSX Mountain Lion you don't have to wait. If you buy your mac now the upgrade is free so it is does not matter that much. You can always wait for better times but waiting for ever shouldn't be the goal.
    I hope i could help you,
    greetings from Europe

  • Which MacBook Pro should I go for? Which will complete my needs?

    I wanted to buy a MacBook Pro for school in September. I was just curious on which model I should go for.
    I need to do the following:
    - I need to be able to run accounting software (Simply Accounting).
    - I need to be able to Skype with friends/family.
    - I need to be able to run Adobe Suite CS5+.
    - I would like to create a home studio surrounded around this new computer.
    - I would like something portable and durable. I need to be able to carry this laptop everyday and it's going to be used in an environment that is more or less abusive.
    - I would also like a CD drive (I still find myself using CDs every once in a while).
    - And I would like to get a nice screen, the stock screen is fine on the 13 inch, but I would need the upgrade on the 15 inch.
    So, basically;
    Option 1: 15 inch MacBook Pro base (no extras)
    Option 2: 13 inch MacBook Pro with an Intel 520 240GB SSD + 8GB RAM
    Option 3: Wait until June/July for the next generation of MacBook Pro's.
    Which would you guy do?
    Thanks.

    Skip the 13", does not have the audio I/O you will need.  The 15" with as much ram as you can afford.  You can wait, keeping in mind that you will spend time working bugs ou, depending how Apple rearranges the "furnature yet again.  I have a 15" running SnowLeopard as my music production, as I do a lot of live, and it is VERY stable. (can't afford issuses)  I have a 13" Bare bones for doing light duty stuff and I'm to lazy to lug the big 15" bag of cables/adapters... with me.  Best of luck, hope I helped, and did not confuse you too much.   All the Best

  • Which Macbook Pro should i get for use with Solidworks?

    I want to get a Macbook Pro but unsure whether to go for the higher end 13 inch or the lower end 15 inch.
    I will be running Solidworks(CAD) a lot as im in my final year of an engineering degree.
    Has anyone got either and had any problems etc?
    Thanks

    Yes, the MBP you've suggested will do fine with MainStage but at the same time, I'd recommend you getting the fastest machine you can realistically afford as MS is still a very resource-hungry beast.....especially once you get to know it and decide that you want to do extra stuff that you didn't originally intend to do with it!
    I also run a MOTU Ultralite MK3 and can recommend this as a very good bang-for-buck interface.....especially the new hybrid model (which I don't have) that has both firewire AND USB. Apart from Apogee interfaces - which are apparently phenomenal (and phenomenally expensive!) - I've also heard extremely good things about the RME Fireface 400 and 800 interfaces.
    But back to the MOTU Ultralite MK3: it has heaps of I/O, is half-rack space (so very portable), is bus-powered (with A/C option), has onboard DSP FX, the latency is very low, is easy to set up and use, and is quite affordable for what you're getting. And MOTU is pretty good with tech support and the drivers are very high quality. Can't go wrong, really.
    The only other thing I'll mention about using a MBP is that having a decent screen size can really help if you're using it live at gigs. I have the current top of the line 17" model and really notice the screen size difference compared to friends who have the 13" or 15" models.....there's a HUGE difference in screen "real estate" with the 17" screen.
    BTW, it's rumored that Apple will soon be announcing the next MBP models and so you may want to wait till the end of April before you decide to buy something.

  • Cannot decide which macbook pro retina to buy

    Hi all,
    I am new to the community even though i have been usinig a macbook since 2009. My old macbook pro got stolen and i need to buy a new one now! I am between the following setups:
    1) refurbished retina 15" early 2013, 2.7Ghz, 512 SSD, Nvidia gt 650, 16 GB ram
    or
    2) new 15" Haswell retina 2,0 Ghz 256 SSD, Iris Pro, 16 GB ram
    Which one would you choose if you take into account that the haswell model is actuall 100$ cheaper than the refurbished one?
    I want o keep it for at least 5 years. Will the Nvidia 650 gt make a big difference? I do not use any demanding photo editing or auto cad software but i would like to be able to play games (First person shooter) from time to time, even though i have a desktop for that.

    Hi! 
    For gaming MB is better with Nvidia GT 650 GPU. Here are these 2 GPU's comparision link
    I have early 2013 Macbook Pro Retina and I am totally happy about GPU and CPU performance.
    But in your way i'll choose newest model, because you have desktop computer for gaming (IMHO gaming is always better on desktop).
    New Haswell cpu is good for battery life!
    In this computer age new is always better

  • Gaming on MacBook pro, should I buy one

    Hi,
          My MacBook is now over 5 years old now, and I am thinking about getting a MacBook pro. My MacBook is ok except, I want multitouch gestures and the ability to play games, as my current Mac has intel gma 950 graphics. I am not good with specs, so I was hoping someone could help me verify that these games would work ok on the baseline 13" MacBook pro:
    Dc universe online
    World of Warcraft
    Portal 2
    Champions online
    Sims 3
    Tell me if these work with intel hd 3000 graphics please
    Thank you ahead of time
    Ps I will be using windows 7 in boot camp

    First off i dont know what "shldr2thewheel" is talking about the 15" macbook pro has both onboard and dedicated video, aka Radeon 6750m which is 1 gig gddr5 .... it runs wow on full settings at 60fps-120fps.... also starcraft 2 on ultra!!! that guy has no clue or isnt a gamer, plus you can bootcamp windows for windows based titles such as skyrim and it looks beautifull. imo go for a mac

Maybe you are looking for