While doing invoice verification, for fright value tax code not appearing

Hi All,
While doing invoice verification for PO which is having fright conditon, system is not displaying tax code in invoice.
Every time user has to select manually in the invoive verification.
Is there is any config missing for that fright condition?
Thanks in Advance.
Anil

Hi
If you wish to default the tax code for the planned delivery costs this                                         
must be obtained from an independent source which is OMR2.                                                      
With OMR2 it is possible to default the tax in the delivery cost                                                
line + header tax. It is not possible to default only in the delivery                                           
cost line. The header tax needs to be changed manually to support the                                           
different tax codes in the item lines.                                                                          
Best regards
Erika

Similar Messages

  • Error while doing invoice verification

    DearAll,
                  I have created a purchase order against cost center and GRN also completed for this now i am trying to complete the invoice verification it is throw the error as "GL ACCOUNT IS NOT DEFINED IN CHART OF ACCOUNTS 0001"
    ANY CONFIG MISSED OUT ANY ONE HELP US.......
    Regards
    P.Anandhakumar

    Hi...
          I have created the PO With account assignment category 'K' with service tax 12.5 percentage.
    after creation it was released. and GRN also completed.
    at the time of invoice verification through T-code MIRO  i have entered the order no. then its taking to process no data captured from the order it is throw the error as " GL Account is not defined in chart of accounts 0001.
    then its coming out... there is no other messages exists....
    kindly sort out this issue....
    Regards
    P.Anandhakumar...

  • While doing MIRO, i am getting error:-Tax code V0 country IN does not exist

    hi frds,
    while doing miro. i am getting this error:-
    pls correct me
    Tax code V0 country IN does not exist in procedure TAXINN
    Message no. FF713
    Diagnosis
    You entered a tax code which is not defined for the country of the company code to be posted to in the tax calculation procedure.
    System Response
    Procedure
    Check and, if necessary, correct the entry.
    Procedure for System Administration
    If it is not an input error, check and possibly change the system settings.
    To do this, choose Maintain entries (F5).
    Check whether the company code is assigned to the correct country and whether the correct tax calculation procedure has been entered for the company code country.
    Create a new tax code if necessary.
    Caution:
    Since it is possible that the tables in question are being updated at a different time on another computer, it can take a certain amount of time for the tax code to be on all local machines in client server architectures after saving the new code.
    regards,
    william

    hi
    go to ftxp choose tax code v0
    here in first input field give 00
    then select that field and click on gl acct tab
    here mention a gl or go to ob40 and mention gl for the acct key of that field
    try finding
    Tax code country IN does not exist in procedure TAXINN
    on SDN u will get many threads
    Tax code XX country IN does not exist in procedure TAXINN (MIRO Error)
    conclusion is u must get acct for at least one condition in the tax code
    regards
    kunal

  • EDI invoice failed for Service- multiple tax code at service item level

    Hi Guys,
    Please understand below scenarios, it is very critical to our client.
    purchase order has 3 parent
    line item which having the 3 services with tax code (P1-P1-P1 and P2-P2-P2 and (P2-P1-C1)
    (P1=10%, P2=10% and C1=10%)
    PO Outbound Idoc -
    Similar tax codes(P1-P1-p1 and P2-P2-P2) - Carries total tax amount and
    tax rate at parent level also it carries indvidual service line item
    tax amount and tax rate at service item level
    Mulitple tax codes(P2-P1-C1)- Carries only total tax amount at parent
    level and no tax rate at parent level. It carries indvidual service
    line item tax amount and tax rate at service item level
    SES Outbound Idoc -
    Similar tax codes(P1-P1-p1 and P2-P2-P2) - Carries total tax amount at
    parent level segment and tax rate at parent item level also it carries
    indvidual service line item tax amount and tax rate at service item
    level
    Mulitple tax codes(P2-P1-C1)- Carries only total tax amount at parent
    level and no tax rate at parent level. It carries indvidual service
    line item tax amount and tax rate at service item level
    But while creating the invoice for parent line item which includes 3
    services, it carries correct tax amount(as per PO and SESR) but it is
    asking for tax rate at parent level not at service item level.
    It is working fine for similar tax code at service line item (e.g P1-P1-p1 for 3 services or P2-P2-P2 for all 3 services) but when we use the combination of tax code or multiple tax code at service line items (e.g. P2-P1-C1), the inbound Idoc gets failed.
    Expectation - How EDI invoice posted for mulitple Services under one parent line item which having multiple tax codes at service item level
    Thanks
    Sanjay
    9930851236

    This is an ongoing problem with lots of clients - did anyone solve it ?

  • While doing ABZON,i am getting the tax code related error

    Hi,
    When i am doing the transaction ABZON,i am getting the below error.kindly help me to fix this issue.
    Tax code I0 doesnot exist for jurisdiction code LA0000000
    Note:Initially i have created the tax code with the combination of 9 digits Tax jurisdiction code.after that on client request,i have deleted those 9 digits tax jurisdiction codes and created with 10 digits tax jurisdiction codes.
    Kindly help me how to fix this issue.
    Thanks
    Supriya

    Hi Supriya,
    This is in continuation to my previous reply.
    There should not be any open items using old tax codes. This error is due to the fact that there are still old open items using those tax codes.
    Tranaction SE16. Run table BSEG and find out all entries with the old tax codes which are still open.
    Try and reverse those and post the entries with new tax codes. In case the system does not allow you to reverse. You may have to recreate these old codes, reverse the entries, delete the codes, create new codes, repost these entries and run ABZON.
    Do let me know if you have any further issues
    Rgds,
    Harmees

  • Surcharge tax code not appear in Remittance Challan(J1INCHLN)

    Hi,
    Surcharge W/tax code is not being displayed in Remittance Challan(J1INCHLN). While we go to J1INCHLN for Creation of Remittance Challan - Post Outgoing Payment :Header Data(F-07) adjusting with 1 based on Document Number it shows all four values of Base, Surcharge, Education Cess and Higher Edu Cess. After adjusting Total TDS value value and SAVE the document, screen appears Create Remittance Challans. Here it shows Bsse, Education Cess and Higher Edu Cess values with corresponding tax codes except surcharge tax codes and values. As a result Total TDS value which was deducted in J1INCHLN (F-07) screen is not being matched with TDS amount which shows in the screen after saving the record. Why this Surcharge tax code and corresponding value is not being appeard after configuration in J1INSUR ?
    Regards,
    Anindita

    Hi,
    1.If you have separate tax codes for Surcharges, J_1IEWT_SURC table
    should be maintained, by setting the check box checked, for the company
    code. Those tax codes should be available in the J_1IEWTSURC table (use
    SM30 to maintain these values)
    2.  If you are using separate tax codes for Education cess, those tax
    codes should be maintained in the J_1IEWTECESS table and 'X' should be
    maintained for the company code in J_1IEWT_ECFLAG table.
    3. Make sure that in the table for surcharge you have only the tax types
    relevant for surcharge AND DOES NOT CONTAIN TAX TYPES RELEVANT TO
    BASIC TAX AND CESS AND
    Make sure that in the table for ECESS you have only the tax types
    relevant for ECESS AND DOES NOT CONTAIN TAX TYPES RELEVANT TO
    BASIC TAX AND SURCHARGE
    Warm Regards,
    Sadashivan

  • Tax code not appearing in Header data of MIRO

    Dear All,
    I have one query and it is as follows.
    I created one Input tax code A3 in transaction FTXP.
    When I went to transaction MIRO this tax code A3 is not appearing in header data of MIRO.
    Can you pls tell is there any other settings to be done to fullfill the above requirment.
    Thanks in advance
    Babu

    Hi
    Create  a tax code in FTXP
    Then assigen tax code to company code
    Maintain condition records FV11
    Try it out
    Regards,
    Raman

  • Invoice verification for blanket PO with account assignment category U (un

    Hi all
    While doing miro when i am doing invoice verification for blanket PO with account assignment category U (unknown) system is not allowing me to enter the GL it is disable,wat can be the possible reason
    Regards
    shailesh

    Hi Shailesh,
    As you have maintained the account assignment category as U the account assignment tab will not be available. If you want to enter a GL account then use the Account assignments K or F or X.
    Else if you want to use U in PO then you can give the GL account and other account assignment details only in the Invoice verification.
    Regards,
    Kathir

  • Validation for tax code not to use

    Dear Gurus,
    i had done validation for purchase/sales tax code not use while doing transction.
    Prerequisite
    BKPF-BUKRS =1000
    CHECK
    NOT BESEG-MESKZ IN ZTAXCODE
    Message
    you can't use this tax code
    i had done this validation for parent company code(1000) but it is giving error for our subsidiary company(3000), though the tax procedure is differnet for both the company taxinj(india) and taxusj(usa). Also the end user is making transction in company code 3000 without tax code still system give him error.
    Please advice how to rectify it.
    Regards,
    Rajesh K

    Hi,
    As per my understanding the Tax Code is same but the Tax Procedures are different for the two Company Codes. The solution is to add Company Code 3000 also in the validation Prerequisite. With this it could work.
    Regards,
    Kiron Kumar T.

  • Invoice Verification for IMPORT PO(ASSET)

    Hi All,
    User has created Purchase order against Import Material for asset with Account Assignment category as A.While invoice verification for basic customs duty,ECS and HSES, system debiting the GL account for Asset instead of CenVat clearing.
    In case of PO against import material for asset with out account assignment category as A, system debiting the cenvat clearing account accurately.
    Current Accounting Entry
    Commissioner Of Customs Credit
    Asset under construction(CWIP) Debit
    Required Account Entry
    Commissioner Of Customs Credit
    Cenval Clearing - Debit
    Customs deposit a/c - Debit
    It is bit urgent.Please provide the solution.
    Santosh

    Hi,
    Go to SPRO > MM > Purchasing > Account Assignment > Maintain Account Assignment Categories > Here for "A", remove "GR Non-Valuated" indicator and then try.
    If it is not working for old PO then create new PO and then try.

  • Customs Invoice Verification for Partial Qty

    Dear All,
    I want to do invoice verification for partial quantity of p.o. only in miro for customs vendor. How can the amount will automatically comes in miro screen if i give partial quantity received in that. Suggest me
    Thanks & Regards,
    Radhika

    Hi BSA,
    Fistly FYI.
    Goods-receipt-based Invoice Verification must be defined in the purchase order.
    In goods-receipt-based Invoice Verification, each goods receipt is settled separately.
    Goods receipts and invoices are matched up in the purchase order history.
    In goods-receipt-based Invoice Verification, it is not possible to post an invoice before the first goods receipt.
    In goods-receipt-based Invoice Verification, the invoice quantity should not be greater than the actual delivered quantity. However, it is possible to post a larger invoice amount. You cannot “reassign” invoices from one goods receipt to another.
    When purchase-order-based Invoice Verification has been defined, all items in the purchase order are presented on the selection screen or in the item list.
    The suggested quantity is the difference between the total delivered quantity and the total invoice quantity.
    When you enter an invoice using the delivery note number or goods receipt document number, the system looks for the corresponding purchase order item and then proceeds in the same way as when you enter an invoice using the purchase order number.
    If there are several goods receipts and invoices for a purchase order item, the purchase order history does not tell you which invoice came from which vendor.        
    For your case it needed to do a MIRO by one GR of one PO.
    And in MIRO you can list items by GRs for a PO with GR-based IV.  It is true. You did two GRs for one PO then you should have two lines in MIRO, I am sure. Please check more after having a rest.
    Regars,
    Bruce

  • MIRO invoice verification for Service entry sheet

    When trying to do invoice verification for Service entry sheet i am getting this below error pls guide me
    Delivery note/service entry sheet 5000000150  does not exist
    Message no. M8183

    Hi,
    You may be saves SES number and now SES is not released!
    1st Just cross check PO history TAB of service PO(ME23N), did you have only service entry sheet number or you have service entry sheet number and material document( will be created after releasing SES) with 101 movement type.
    You have created service entry sheet (SES) in ML81N and got SES number, so as to recognize the vendor performed service. Next step, you need to accept service by releasing SES( in ML81N by clicking green flag or if release strategy there for SES, you need to release SES in ML85) so that  FI document will be created.
    Once SES released, then you can do MIRO w.r.t SES only.
    Check doc:
    http://help.sap.com/bp_bl604/BBLibrary/Documentation/209_BPP_EN_FI.doc
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Invoice Verification for Capital PO with Vendor (alternate Payee)

    Hi all,
    I want to do Invoice verification for capital PO where the payment to the vendor A is made by  vendor B ( Alternate payer).
    I have created new partner role and given Vendor B as Alternate Payer in PO.
    PR, PO with Account Assignment category "A". GR done.
    My question is : I need to do Invoice Verification.
    Option A :verify the Invoice of Vendor A.
    Option B : verify in Hardcopy and hand over it to Vendor B for making immediate payment.  Since I need to pay Vendor B,  I planned to change the name of the vendor in Detail tab as Vendor B. In this way, my payment processing is being done for Vendor B.
    Please let me know which option is right. Please suggest if there are other ways of doing this.
    Since Vendor B will take the Asset and lease it to me and will make the payment to Vendor A immediately. I want to pay Vendor B in installments.
    Due to some technical reasons, I am not able to do MIRO ( It says short dump).
    Hence, I am not able to try successfully in Dev server.
    regards
    Partha

    > About your short dump contact your system admin.
    >
    > About your process if you are leasing the equipment
    > then it's better to use service order.
    > Other wise what evet you have suggetsed is the
    > solution looks to me by looking your esplanation.
    Hi Mr.Patel
    What is the process that you suggest by Service Order.
    Is it possible to explain in detail please for the benefit of the forum and for me.
    Partha

  • Manual invoice verification for cross  company sales

    Hi
    I am doings sales from ordering company code with supllying compnay code plant.
    and i am doing intercompany billing.
    ex: code 7000(ordering cocd)
          sls org 7000(ordering sls org)
    plant 7000
       cocd 2000
    sls org 2000
    plant 2000
    the sales order is created for sls org 7000 with delivering plant 2000 for cross company sales.
    customer invoice is done
    intercompany invoice is done.
    here how to do manual invoice verification for intercompany billing for cocd 7000.
    what is ref filed in miro.
    regards
    Ramachandra

    Hi
        Yes it is possible.For this you have to maintain  company code clearing accounts in OBYA( i.e. say for example if you have two company codes, company code A & Company code B.you maintain clearing accounts for this two company codes.
    go to obya
    enter your company codes and  select.
    You enter a debit posting key and account debit for company code 1
    similarly you enter a credit posting key and account credit for company code 1
    repeat the same for the company code 2 and save it.
    After that you procure for company code A and do GR for the same.
    Now the system will allow you to post the Invoice.
    Thanks & Regards
    SRI.

  • How does APEX check for null values in Text Fields on the forms?

    Hello all,
    How does APEX check for null values in Text Fields on the forms? This might sound trivial but I have a problem with a PL/SQL Validation that I have written.
    I have one select list (P108_CLUSTER_ID) and one Text field (P108_PRIVATE_IP). I made P108_CLUSTER_ID to return null value when nothing is selected and assumed P108_PRIVATE_IP to return null value too when nothign is entered in the text field.
    All that I need is to validate if P108_PRIVATE_IP is entered when a P108_CLUSTER_ID is selected. i.e it is mandatory to enter Private IP when a cluster is seelcted and following is my Pl/SQL code
    Declare
    v_valid boolean;
    Begin
    IF :P108_CLUSTER_ID is NULL and :P108_PRIVATE_IP is NULL THEN
    v_valid := TRUE;
    ELSIF :P108_CLUSTER_ID is NOT NULL and :P108_PRIVATE_IP is NOT NULL THEN
    v_valid := TRUE;
    ELSIF :P108_CLUSTER_ID is NOT NULL and :P108_PRIVATE_IP is NULL THEN
    v_valid := FALSE;
    ELSIF :P108_CLUSTER_ID is NULL and :P108_PRIVATE_IP is NOT NULL THEN
    v_valid := FALSE;
    END IF;
    return v_valid;
    END;
    My problem is it is returning FALSE for all the cases.It works fine in SQL Command though..When I tried to Debug and use Firebug, I found that Text fields are not stored a null by default but as empty strings "" . Now I tried modifying my PL/SQL to check Private_IP against an empty string. But doesn't help. Can someone please tell me how I need to proceed.
    Thanks

    See SQL report for LIKE SEARCH I have just explained how Select list return value works..
    Cheers,
    Hari

Maybe you are looking for