Why 2BDOCS are getting created for sending Sold to Party to ECC.

Hi,
I have a question, when BP (Sold to) gets create in CRM & replicates in successfully ECC.When I see Tran SMW01, I found two bdocs are getting created for same Sold to. Why this is happening!! How I can remove the another Bdoc type (VEND_MAIN).
Please suggest.

Hello Developer,
Yes, I've checked the combinations of webshop(In Shopadmin) and Product Catalog.(Sales Area)
All of them are compatible.
Hey DJ,
When you say: u201Cthe first entry maintained in the USAPPLREF tableu201Du2026.in our case, there are 2 entries for my user (PPELA3). The first one is for object type BUS1006001 and object key nr° 23263-my contact person, linked to sold-to nr° 1000003), which is the employee that I 've created in the ISAUSERADMIN.
The second entry is with object type KNA1 with object key nr° 1000003 (which is the sold-to).
Those are the only entries for my user in this table.
Does this sequence have the influence described by you? Is that what you want to say?
Other point: Does the REFERENCE CUSTOMER is important for the B2B scenario? (Our case) Since I thought it was important just for B2C scenarios, It was the same number in SHOPADMIN Webshop creation.
In the meantime, I will create a new reference customer and change the webshop parameters.
Thanks for your inputs.
Regards,
Paulo Pela

Similar Messages

EREC: Multipal IDOC are getting created in receiver system for one IDOC

Hello Experts,
I ran in to one wearied issue in IDOC creation in Receiver system. I am running PFAL in sender system for only Person but 10 IDOC are getting created in receiver system. I don't know why is this happening.
This issue started popping up after we ran RBDAPP01-Inbound Processing of IDocs Ready for Transfer. We ran this to change IDOC to 53 status. Now I don't know what went wrong but Perner distribution is behaving
Appreciate your help.
Regards,
Krishna Bidwai
Losangeles USA.
818 527 0204.

Yes, employee is getting created after adding 0003 into the filter, but can u please answer my another question, i.e. PERNR in sender and receiver system should be same.
So in Receiver system (ECC) do i need to maintain external number range for PERNR?
Thanks

DefaultTrace. x .trc are getting creating around 6 for minute

Hi Gurus,
In one of our production system at \j2ee\cluster\server0\log\defaultTrace.<x>.trc these traces files are getting generated around 6 for every minute with 10 MB each. Not sure why these many are getting created and everytime 10 MB each?
Please help me with some fix
Thanks in adavance
Regards
Sekhar

Old logs are compressed (zipped up) to save disk space. By default, logs are written to a maximum of five files with 10MB capacity of each file. Thus, when this set of five files are full, it will rotate back to the first file and start overwriting the old logs. Before overwriting the old logs, the Log Configurator service backs up the five files into a zip file. So, each zip file contains a set of five log files. The logs within these zip files are called archive logs

Schedule line getting created for material whose stocks are maintained

Hi Friends,
I am having an unusual problem of schedule line getting created for material whose stocks are there in the system. I have created an SO for some material, and all the material is having sufficient qty in the system but still the system is generating schedule line.
Can someone please advice what could be the problem and the solution to it.
Regards,
Wasim.

Hello Wasim,
- In TCode MM02, Check Scheduling in MRP2 Tab of Material master (if MRP is active.)
- In Tcode OVZ9 - AvC control, for your Availability check maintain (eg. 02) in material & Checking Rule:A-SD order.
Whether Check availability without replenishment lead time is unchecked, as this Indicates whether, during the availability check, the system checks the replenishment lead time. So, Items for which the delivery date falls within the replenishment lead time, but for which there is no inventory, are confirmed for delivery after the replenishment lead time. In the case of items for which the delivery date falls after the end of the replenishment lead time, the system assumes that everything can be confirmed.
Thanks & Regards
JP

Empty files are getting created at receiver FTP server

Hi Experts,
I have an Idoc to File scenario where I am sending an XML file to receiver FTP server.
Scenario is working fine but sometimes an empty file is getting generated at receiver FTP server.
I have already selected ignore empty file at receiver channel so issue is not within PI system configuration.
When I checked the message log I can see that almost all the files are getting created successfully without any issues, but
for some files/messages I can see that there are below error logs.
"Transmitting the message to endpoint <local> using connection IDoc_AAE_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System failed, due to: com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: Could not get FTP connection from connection pool (1 connections) within 5,000 milliseconds; increase the number of available connections"
"Exception caught by adapter framework: Could not get FTP connection from connection pool (1 connections) within 5,000 milliseconds; increase the number of available connections."
And after there is again success message log in the same message and it creating a file successfully during that time stamp.
but the third party is sometime receiving empty file which I am not able to find in any trace or log (my file name is SD_timestamp.xml).
Can you please let me know what is the solution and what adjustments FTP server need to do in order to resolve this issue.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Rahul Kulkarni

The error you are getting that says "Could not get FTP connection from connection pool (1 connections) within 5,000 milliseconds; increase the number of available connections" has probably nothing to do with the empty files problem.
I second Hareesh Gampa that you first should try "temporary file creation". You might also need to tell the FTP owner that he should only pick up files with that are written completely and that do comply with a negotiated file name schema. The temp file should have another schema of course then. He should not pick up just every file that is written. See here for details
http://help.sap.de/saphelp_nw74/helpdata/en/44/6830e67f2a6d12e10000000a1553f6/content.htm
HTH
Cheers
Jens

Why filters are not awailable for my objects?

Why filters are not awailable for my objects?

Based on your screenshot preview, I can see that from your Elements panel, you are using an external .html file, correct?
Some in-app Properties are not available for external, non-managed files.
If you create a new project (File > New), for example, add an element you will have full access to Edge Animate properties.
If you create a htm5 doc in Dreamweaver, for example, and open that in Edge Animate then you are limited - because the originating file (.html) is from another application.
Hope this helps, clarify.
Darrell

Why there are overloaded create methods in Statful bean?

Hi all,
I have a question ...!
Why there are overloaded create methods for Statefule beans? and why not for Stateless bean?
because any way these create methods are for giving referneces of EJB objects.hence, what is use of overloaded methods in stateful bean?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Rahul

Hi Rahul,
Each stateful session bean is tied to a particular client. That means whatever state is passed in during create() is guaranteed
to be available on subsequent invocations. Allowing multiple create methods is a convenience.
For stateless session beans there is no prescribed relationship between the caller and which bean instance is used to handle
an invocation. It wouldn't make sense to allow creation parameters since there would be no guarantee that a subsequent
invocation is handled by an instance containing that particular initialization state.
All of this only applies to the EJB 2.1 and earlier API. Starting in EJB 3.0, there are no longer explicit create() methods.
As you've seen there isn't any benefit to having them in the stateless case. For stateful session beans in EJB 3.0, the
developer can perform initialization by just declaring a particular business method and calling that after first acquiring a
new stateful session bean reference.
--ken

Temporary tables are getting created, name starting with BIN$.....

Hi,
I am using Oracle 10.2 and am experiencing an issue that doing some operations on existing tables, some temporary tables are getting created starting with BIN$.
For ex: BIN$HULdSlmnRZmbCXAl/pkA9w==$0
But I dont see these tables in the database after two or three days. I found that these temporary tables are a replica of existing tables and these contain only the table structure but not the data. I even not able to drop them from database.
Can anyone throw some pointers on this?
Thanks and Regards,
Siva

These tables are in the Oracle recycle bin. When you drop a table, Oracle just renames it to BIN$xxx so that you can undrop the table if you made a mistake.
- You can ignore tables in the recycle bin if you would like. Oracle will automatically purge them when it needs the space.
- You can prevent a table from going in to the recycle bin by adding the purge command to the drop, i.e.
DROP TABLE table_name PURGE- You can empty out the recycle bin using the command
SQL> purge dba_recyclebin(or just recyclebin if you only want to clear out the objects you own from the recyclebin).
Justin

How the ASN in or out messages are getting created whenever there is any action performed related to these messages.

Hi ,
Can any one please let me know with an example like,
I have receive the ASNin message in SIM and then ASNOUT will get created and flowes to RMS.
How these ASNin or out messages are getting created.

Hi Keith,
You stated that "I think Geoff's showing remarkable tolerance by not just deleting the whole thread." Are we in the third world countries that there are no freedom of speech?!!!
I appreciate your help.
Some of you mentioned that I don't know how to use it. I have a question for you where did you learn how to use Lightroom? I learned the same way everyone learns. Study the subjects by reading books, videos, taking classes and enroll in some kind of training. I am following all the instructions that I can my hand on. I wish that instead of accusing me of not knowing have a different view of the issue. What if there is a bug in the program? Some of you were and are very successful and that does not mean that the program does not have some issues. We all use the program differently, and with these differences ways in using it some problems will come out for some and not for others.
I am not promoting one program over the other, and I am not putting Lightroom down. I am just expressing how I feel. Put yourself in my shoes and spent just hours creating some renaming templates and suddenly you find out that it is not there anymore and all your efforts are gone with the wind. I then go and search through the internet to find out what did I do wrong and how to solve it. I find out that I am not alone, and there others that still waiting for the solution to come.
Let be open and do not hush people, and when you do that it will be the end of any progress or improvement on how everything is.
I would like to express my deepest gratitude to all of you. You are all supportive and very helpful.
Thank you and have a very Happy New Year.
Mo

Junk transactions are getting created in WF_ITEMS

Hi,
We have a severe problem, hundreds of junk transactions are getting created in wf_items table daily (for same item_type and same root_activity). For all of these transactions the 'owner_role' is same and these are left active (end_date is null). These transactions are not having either Parent or Child records. Due to these transactions performance is getting impacted. Please help us in finding the root of these transactions.
Thanks a lot in advance,
Ramu
Edited by: Ramu G on Dec 29, 2010 7:54 PM

Hi Srini,
OS: Linux 2.6.18-128.4.1.0.1.el5PAE
DB: Oracle DB 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production
EBS version: R12.1.3
I could see these junk transactions since 2003 but from 2009 onwards these were getting created in huge amount. 2003 to 2008 total number of transactions are < 10000, but in 2009 : 340000 and in 2010 (till today) 470000.
one sample record:
Item Type: HRSSA
Item Key: 9727158
Root Activity: ORA_GEN_MAINT_PERINFO_V5_PRC
Root Activity Version: 39
Owner Role: [email protected]
Parent Item TYpe: NULL
Parent Item Key: NULL
Parent Context: NULL
Begin Date: 16-Oct-2010
End Date: NULL
User Key: Personal Information V5.0
HA Migration Flag: NULL
Secuirty Group ID: NULL
I am not sure what was changed and which is causing this data.
Thank you,
Ramu

IDOCs stopped getting created for FB01 transaction

Hey Guys,
I m facing a strange problem, the idocs for message type FIDCC2 was getting creating for transaction FB01, FBR1, FPG1. But from sometime it has stopped creating the IDOCs. I have not chnaged anything in the system. Not sure why this has caused so.
Please help me out on this ?? also I need to change the segment data for the same, Please share me a user exit where i can incorporate this???
Raj

Hi,
There is no error as such, we did the config for the FIDCC2 message type Basic type FIDCCP02 and whenever we post a FI document and IDOC was getting created.
Now just earlier, it suddenly stop generating IDOCs we did n't make any change to the system. The source and sestination system is up and running. Not sure what caused this...
Raj

Multiple processes getting created for weblogic instance.

multiple process creating for weblogic instance. which lead to slow performance.
/home/dz84tl> ptree 24524
1464 zsched
24524 /usr/bin/ksh /usr/local/bea/wls92/domains/gqts/bin/startWebLogic_gqts001 nodebu
24547 /usr/local/bea/wls92/jdk150_22/bin/java -server -Xms1024m -Xmx1024m -XX:NewRati
3401 /usr/local/bea/wls92/jdk150_22/bin/java -server -Xms1024m -Xmx1024m -XX:NewRati
It is supposed to be only one child process but there are multiple.

Hi,
Nodemanager is not used to start the managed server.
below is the snnipet:-
Bgqts 26106 1464 0 May 11 ? 0:00 /usr/bin/ksh/usr/local/bea/wls92/domains/gqts/bin/startWeblogicgqts001_ nodebu
Bgqts 22800 22799 0 08:51:35 ? 0:01 grep Bgqts
Bgqts 26125 26106 1 May 11 ? 1004:14 /usr/local/bea/wls92/jdk105_22/bin/java -server -Xms1024m -Xmx1024m -XX:NewRati
Bgqts 13775 26125 0 06:17:03 ? 0:0 /usr/local/bea/wls92/jdk105_22/bin/java -server -Xms1024m -Xmx1024m -XX:NewRati
Bgqts 26646 1464 0 May 11 ? 0:00 /usr/bin/ksh/usr/local/bea/wls92/domains/gqt/sbin/startWeblogic.sh
Bgqts 26678 26646 0 May 11 ? 9:05 /usr/local/bea/wls92/jdk105_22/bin/java -server -Xms512m -Xmx512m -XX:MaxPermSii
Bgqts 24187 26125 0 11:20:32 ? 0:00 /usr/local/bea/wls92/jdk105_22/bin/java -server -Xms1024m -Xmx1024m -XX:NewRatii
Bgqts 14710 26125 0 8:13:19 ? 0:00 /usr/local/bea/wls92/jdk105_22/bin/java -server -Xms1024m -Xmx1024m -XX:NewRati
As I understood there is some time gap between this process creation.also we can see here even after using startWeblogic.sh instances are getting created.
There are other two domains but in those domains this problem is not seen. only gqts domain has this issue.also in other two domains the same script is used.
Really not getting what can be the reason behind this process creation.
Does it mean startWeblogic.sh is creating processes?
or the application which are deployed on managed servers are responsible for it?
Thanks in Advance.

Call items are not created for Org BP's when created from Campaigns

Hello All,
We are creating Campaigns for Org BP's and pushing them to channel Phone, which is creating call list but call items are not created for Org BP's.
Org BP's are maintained with Contact Person's, callling hours and phone number are maintained against contact person BP, but still call items are not created with in call list.
Please let me know if I miss any further steps.
Thanks,
Raj.

Hi Debasis,
You can delete the PDS by using /SAPAPO/CULL_RTO_DEL - Delete Production Data Structure . And recif the it to APO. You can use CURTO_CREATE for it.
For the error message /SAPAPO/OM_ERROR2 119 there are couple of OSS notes please check the same.
1648558 - CIF error: 'Mode linkage problem with primary resource'
1325227 - PDS-EXP: Mode linkage problem with primary resource
Regards,
RBrahmankar

Weird filename are getting created in archive directory.

Hi All,
Weird filename are getting created in archive directory.
I have one ftp adapter,after the file getting processed the file's are getting moved to archive directory.
But with some different file name/ filename are randomly generated. But the content of the file remains the same.
Pls suggest.
Thanks.

This is standard functionality, it uses the original filename with a suffix of the datetime.
cheers
James

Processing log not getting updated for send immediatly

Hi,
I have a custom output type and a Custom function module for issueing the output for delivery, my prob is that it processing log is getting updated for the send in batch and other options but it is not getting updated for the SEND IMMEDIATLY, I am using the same FM for the Output issue I am checking if they have selected output type as 4 if yes, I am calling a FM in perform by saying
PERFORM xxxxxxxx ON COMMIT
and in the perform I am calling a FM
CALL FUNCTION xxxxxxxxx in BACKGROUND TASK AS A SEPARATE TASK,
the functioanlity of issueing the output is working but the Processing log is not getting updated.
What might be the problem ? it is getting updated for Send in batch but not for except 4.

I am updating Log using this form
at every step I am collecting the messages and passing them to this form.
FORM update_nast_log USING   p_msgid
                              p_msgnr
                              p_msgty
                              p_msgv1
                              p_msgv2
                              p_msgv3
                              p_msgv4.
* Local data declaration
DATA: lv_msgid LIKE sy-msgid,
        lv_msgnr LIKE sy-msgno,
        lv_msgty LIKE sy-msgty,
        lv_msgv1 LIKE sy-msgv1,
        lv_msgv2 LIKE sy-msgv2,
        lv_msgv3 LIKE sy-msgv3,
        lv_msgv4 LIKE sy-msgv4.
* clear all the local variables
CLEAR:lv_msgid,
        lv_msgnr,
        lv_msgty,
        lv_msgv1,
        lv_msgv2,
        lv_msgv3,
        lv_msgv4.
* move message ID,number,msg type and the messsages
*     to local variables
MOVE: p_msgid TO lv_msgid,
        p_msgnr TO lv_msgnr,
        p_msgty TO lv_msgty,
        p_msgv1 TO lv_msgv1,
        p_msgv2 TO lv_msgv2,
        p_msgv3 TO lv_msgv3,
        p_msgv4 TO lv_msgv4.
* Update nast table using nast protocol update
CALL FUNCTION 'NAST_PROTOCOL_UPDATE'
    EXPORTING
      msg_arbgb = lv_msgid
      msg_nr    = lv_msgnr
      msg_ty    = lv_msgty
      msg_v1    = lv_msgv1
      msg_v2    = lv_msgv2
      msg_v3    = lv_msgv3
      msg_v4    = lv_msgv4.
ENDFORM.                    " UPDATE_NAST_LOG

Why 2BDOCS are getting created for sending Sold to Party to ECC.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for