Why is Encore producing such bad standard definition DVDs?

Hi everyone I really need your help, Encore makes me wanna pull my hair out. We just switched from Final Cut Pro to the new Adobe CS6 Production Suite so I am fairly new to this set-up so please point out anything that I am doing wrong, any pointers, anything... I really want to learn.
Here is the issue: I have my project looking great in Premiere Pro, when I export to Encore, it still looks nice... then when I burn the DVD...all the drama unfolds..the picture is soft, grainy and just downright nasty looking. The color of the footage looks nice on my monitor and another one in the studio and even my bosses' PC laptop but in some DVD players the talent looks like they have a tan... the reds are just way off.  We even have some footage from a RED camera and just as a test burned that to a DVD and the same exact thing happened. I have lived on the forum for days and have exhausted all efforts so I am reaching out to everyone...
Here is some info on the footage, the sequence settings and what I have tried:
The footage was filmed with a Panasonic AG - HPX170P Camera using the DVCPRO50 720p/24p format.
(Footage specs: 960 x 720 - Frame Rate: 29.97 (24p) - Pixel Aspect ratio : 1.3333
The Premiere Pro sequence setting was chosen from the sequence presets under DVCPROHD / 720p / DVCPROHD 720p 24
The specs of that preset is:
Editing Mode: P2 720p 60HZ DVCPRO HD
Timebase: 23.976 Frames Per Second
Pixel Aspect Ratio: HD Anamorphic 1080 (1.333)
Fields: No Fields : Progressive scan
Display Format: 24fps Time code
What I have tried:
Dynamic link - Encore doesn't like the AE comps that are in the sequence. I rendered those out and dropped them back in with the same result...In Encore they would stutter and skip when played.
I then exported out of Premiere through the Media Encoder as a quicktime file, H.264 and MPEG-DVD. All of these files look great in Encore but burned to a DVD.
I'm on a Mac so I couldn't try the windows codecs to see if that helped either.
Anyone have any ideas? Now, there could be some media veterans out there bursting out in laughter and know exactly what is going on so please do share with this young media grasshopper. Thanks to everyone for their patience and willingness to help. I find it awesome that there are people out there that want to help others.
Everyone have a great day, happy editing...
Much thanks,
-Darby

Mr. Smith! Thank you so much sir for your reply... the tutorials link is worth its weight in gold!
I  tried the MPEG2-DVD method after reading on these forums to try that when the Dynamic Link doesn't work..in fact... I think that was you
The MPEG2 - DVD  looks really nice in Encore but once it is on a DVD not so much at all... I talked to Adobe Support today and they even admitted that it shouldn't look that bad, after almost 3 hours of experimenting the gent exported out of Premiere Pro as a QuickTime file with the Video Codec being Animation. It still isn't the greatest but he said that is all he could do, that thatwas the best he could get out of Encore. He did play the DVD that I burned through the VLC Media Player and it looked decent so could it be Encore? To me that can't be the best that Encore can do, professional businesses use this software and I know they can't just be putting out crap and accepting it as such.  I know it's hard to know what I'm saying without seeing it.
When I played the DVDs on my Mac, they looked pretty good color wise, but when I played them on DVD players hooked to TVs the talent's faces were almost a sun burned color. Could it be the DVD players? I am going to do some more experimenting playing the DVD on different DVD players tonight and see if anything comes from it, check out the tutorials that you sent over and if all else fails call Adobe back. I'll let you know how it turns out in case someone else has the same problem.
Thanks for your help agian Mr. Smith, it's greatly appreciated!
-Darby

Similar Messages

  • Acvhd to standard definition DVD vs. Standard definition to DVD

    Hi,
    If I shoot with a good acvhd camera and then make a standard definition DVD, how would the quality of the DVD compare to shooting with a good mini DV camera such as a Canon GL2 and making a standard definition DVD?
    Thanks

    IMO the GL2 to DVD will look better.
    If you burn to Blue ray the AVCHD footage will knock it's socks off.
    Blue ray however is not as universally excepted as DVD at the minute.
    Al

  • I have HD video in the AVCHD format that I need to compress and put on a Standard definition DVD.  Any suggestions?

    I am trying to get multiple games on one DVD without compromising the quality of the HD video too much.  Any suggestions on the bit rate to get a small file size and still good quality to watch on an HD televison set.
    I am not putting the video ono Blu-ray.
    Do I need to change to 720x480 and adjust the bitrate to find the sweet spot?
    Thanks

    Typical workflow for best quality results: bring your media into a video editor like FCP edit and export separate Pro Res master files. Using an authoring program like DVD Studio Pro or Adobe Encore, create your menu and sub menus linked to the individual movies.
    Bring the Pro Res files into Compressor and set up a batch. Duplicate the DVD Disc Burning  presets for video and audio. For the video, in Frame Controls set Resize Filter to Best. Un the Encoder, drop the average bit rate to 7 Mbps. Set the Mode to 2 Pass VBR, Name and save this custom setting. In the Dolby Digital Inspector change Dialogue Normalization to -31. Name and save this custom setting.
    Submit a short, representative test of a section of one of your movies by marking it in the preview window, Burn a disc without a menu and test it on your player to make sure it plays without glitches and that the image quality is acceptable. Make adjustments as needed.
    When satisfied, make you DVD with your menu.
    Note: If you don't have access to DVDSP or Encore, get hold of a copy of iDVD and use the Pro Res files directly.
    Good luck.
    Russ

  • Why is Encore CS6 Menu quality so poor/bad?

    Hello All,
    My client and I are frustrated on the image quality of the menu in Encore when creating a Standard Definition DVD.
    The menu source is a .psd. Tried various resolutions and once the dvd is ceated the image is very pixellated and hard to read the text in the logos (see attachment). Also tried making a motion menu with that image by creating a timeline with it in P Pro. Same results.
    I understand that this is SD and that the customer is playing back the 720 x 480 image on a high resolution monitor which doesn't help.
    The videos portions of the DVD are OK (mpg2) and the graphics hold up a lot better in the video portions.
    Would appreciate any advice on this issue as my client and I are very frustrated.
    I will try and test this on another system today.
    What do you think about a hardware/software (something other than Encore) solution to create a decent looking DVD?
    Thanks in advance,
    John
    This is a full frame screen shot from the DVD.

    When you bring a higher than DVD resolution image into Encore, Encore downrezzes it to the project setting when you render the menu and/or build the project.
    You can only avoid that if you make the background image the correct size. You can only avoid Encore rendering if you don't add any other elements other than highlights (the layers in photoshop with =1, =2 etc.).
    If any of the images are part of a highlight layer, you get big problems; I don't think that is an issue for you.
    Logos have often been scaled in various ways; I wonder if that could be having an effect.
    But, I did not think the image looked that bad once it had it set to the DVD pixel size and was viewing it at the size.
    You certainly do not get an accurate test viewing as your client was on a large computer monitor.
    Create a test disk and view on an HD TV with an upscaling player. For me that is the modern, practical test.
    The other test you might do is to take the logos out of the equation by making a menu with several fonts/sizes to simulate the text issue in the menu. DVD and small text are just not a winning combination. The logos may be scaled too small for so many on one screen.

  • Why isn't my high definition video converting to standard definition?

    What I'm describing here, I've successfully accomplished many, many times using Premiere Pro CS5 and now Premiere Pro CS6. Now, for the first time ever, it's not working and I'm completely baffled. (This is a high-end Windows 7 64-Bit machine with 16GB RAM running Premiere Pro CS6.)
    Here's a basic summary of my workflow. Nothing out of the ordinary here.
    1. I shoot my video using a high definition camcorder (the same one I've been working with for the past year or two.
    2. I import my high definition video into a 1920x1080 sequence in Premiere Pro CS6.
    3. I edit my sequence until I'm happy.
    4. I enter and name my Encore chapter markers in the sequence.
    5. I create my Encore project and import the sequence as a timeline and set up my menus and such.
    6. I build my Encore project, first into a standard definition DVD image file (so I can later burn SD-DVDs) and then build it again into a high definition Blu-ray image file (so I can later burn Blu-rays).
    The Blu-ray burn is turning out just fine.
    But the video in the DVD burn is all black. I can jump around from chapter to chapter and I can hear the sound, but the video doesn't show up!
    I tried this a couple times thinking that maybe Encore just messed up the SD-DVD creation process but I got the same result each time. When I preview the project in Encore, it all looks just right.
    So I figured, okay, something's not working when I import the sequence.
    I went back to Premiere Pro thinking I'd just export my 1920x1080 sequence into a widescreen standard definition AVI and create a new sequence just for the standard definition DVD.
    The exported AVI is black as well!!
    I don't get it. Why on earth won't my high definition video convert properly to standard definition?
    The high definition sequence looks completely normal in Premiere Pro. What could I possibly be overlooking??
    One final note. Just as another test, I copied and pasted the sequence in Premier Pro, truncated it to a couple minutes (the full sequence is 90 minutes long), and exported to a widescreen AVI again.
    It just finished, I tried playing it back in Windows, and it, too, is all black, sound but no video.
    Like I said, this is nothing new for me. I've done it countless times with other projects. I could really use some assistance with this one.

    So I exported my completed high definition sequence to an MP4 and re-imported back into Premiere Pro. Right-clicked it and created a sequence from the clip. Then I imported my chapters from the old sequence into the new one.
    I returned to Encore, modified my project to work off the newly created sequence (what a pain having to recreate all the scene links) and voila, it had no trouble making a DVD this time.
    So I guess I'll get out of the bad habit of my old routine and create a sequence the "right" way from now on. Funny how we get used to doing something one way and stop thinking outside the box after a while.
    Jim, I don't see how that's necessary. As long as I create an Encore project based on a good high definition sequence, I have never had to do anything other than have Encore build a standard definition DVD based on the high definition sequences. It has always done the conversion for me and produced really good DVDs. Once I create a DVD image that I'm satisfied with, I simply have Encore build a Blu-ray image using the exact same project, and that works perfectly as well. I suppose I may be missing something here but it all works and works well, so I don't see a reason to create two projects when one works well.
    On a separate note, is it just me or doesn't everybody think it's high time that Adobe offer a feature to import markers from one sequence into another. I can do it automatically but I have to use a macro that I created separate and apart from Premiere Pro. For that matter, I think Encore should also offer a feature to remap all scene links to a new sequence instead of forcing me to fix them one by one myself.
    Anyway, thanks to all of you for pointing me in the right direction!

  • HDV to standard definition

    I am thinking of getting Premiere Elements.  Can I convert 1080i HDV files into standard definition files for making standard definition DVDs?  Is the quality of the conversion good?

    Well, PrE will do the down-rez for you, in several ways, however down-rezzing is not the strong suit for either PrE, or PrPro. For some background and suggestions for ultimate performance, you might want to see this TUTORIAL.
    Good luck,
    Hunt

  • Creating a Standard Def DVD from an HD project

    I have an 2 hour HD project in Final Cut Pro and would like to make a standard definition DVD (letterboxed in 4x3).
    What would people recommend me in terms of building the cleanest, best looking final result?
    Downconverting via compressor to mpeg2 at the highest quality for a 2 hour length seems to be the best option? I'm not sure what will give me the best looking result. Does downconverting the HD sequence degrade image quality?
    Thank you for your expertise.

    Try kenstone.net

  • Creation of BADI's Definition, why?

    Hello everyone,
    i hope someone can explain to me, why we should create BADI's definition.
    This is my point:
    BADI's are enhancements, that are available in the Standard SAP, to offer the possibilty of changing/improving the standard code to respond correctly to a company/customer needs. Customer can implement these definitions.
    So, even if we create a new BADI definition, this could'n be trigger/active by/in the standard code.
    So, the possibility of creating "customer" BADIS definition, is for when you develop a customer program, and you want to create an enhancements in that development?
    I associate the BADI's definition to enhancements made by SAP developers in SAP Standard, and badi's implementation to customer developers.
    It's like an analogy with SMOD( SAP ) and CMOD (CUSTOMER).
    Could somone explain to me, the benefits from creating BADI's definition's from customer point of view?
    Thanks for your attention,
    Pedro

    Hi,
    Have a look at below links.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/e6/d54d3c596f0b26e10000000a11402f/content.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/c2/eab541c5b63031e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
    Business add-ins are enhancements to the standard version of the system.
    Business Add-In is a new SAP enhancement technique based on ABAP Objects.
    They can be inserted into the SAP system based on specific user requirements.
    Each Business Add-In has:
    • at least one Business Add-In definition
    • a Business Add-In interface
    • a Business Add-In class that implements the interface
    In order to enhance a program, a Business Add-In must first be defined
    Subsequently two classes are automatically generated:
    • An interface with ‘IF_EX_’ inserted between the first and second characters of the BADI name.
    • An adapter class with ‘CL_EX_’ inserted between the first and second characters of the BADI name.
    The Application developer creates an interface for this Add-In.
    There are multiple ways of searching for BADI.
    • Finding BADI Using CL_EXITHANDLER=>GET_INSTANCE
    • Finding BADI Using SQL Trace (TCODE-ST05).
    • Finding BADI Using Repository Information System (TCODE- SE84).
    1. Go to the Transaction, for which we want to find the BADI, take the example of Transaction VD02. Click on System->Status. Double click on the program name. Once inside the program search for ‘CL_EXITHANDLER=>GET_INSTANCE’.
    Make sure the radio button “In main program” is checked. A list of all the programs with call to the BADI’s will be listed.
    The export parameter ‘EXIT_NAME’ for the method GET_INSTANCE of class CL_EXITHANDLER will have the user exit assigned to it. The changing parameter ‘INSTANCE’ will have the interface assigned to it. Double click on the method to enter the source code.Definition of Instance would give you the Interface name.
    2. Start transaction ST05 (Performance Analysis).
    Set flag field "Buffer trace"
    Remark: We need to trace also the buffer calls, because BADI database tables are buffered. (Especially view V_EXT_IMP and V_EXT_ACT)
    Push the button "Activate Trace". Start transaction VA02 in a new GUI session. Go back to the Performance trace session.
    Push the button "Deactivate Trace".
    Push the button "Display Trace".
    The popup screen "Set Restrictions for Displaying Trace" appears.
    Now, filter the trace on Objects:
    • V_EXT_IMP
    • V_EXT_ACT
    Push button "Multiple selections" button behind field Objects
    Fill: V_EXT_IMP and V_EXT_ACT
    All the interface class names of view V_EXT_IMP start with IF_EX_. This is the standard SAP prefix for BADI class interfaces. The BADI name is after the IF_EX_.
    So the BADI name of IF_EX_CUSTOMER_ADD_DATA is CUSTOMER_ADD_DATA
    3. Go to “Maintain Transaction” (TCODE- SE93).
    Enter the Transaction VD02 for which you want to find BADI.
    Click on the Display push buttons.
    Get the Package Name. (Package VS in this case)
    Go to TCode: SE84->Enhancements->Business Add-inns->Definition
    Enter the Package Name and Execute.
    Here you get a list of all the Enhancement BADI’s for the given package MB.
    For more info have a look at below links:
    http://support.sas.com/rnd/papers/sugi30/SAP.ppt
    http://www.sts.tu-harburg.de/teaching/sap_r3/ABAP4/abapindx.htm
    http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/skarkada/sap/
    http://www.ct-software.com/reportpool_frame.htm
    http://www.saphelp.com/SAP_Technical.htm
    http://www.kabai.com/abaps/q.htm
    http://www.guidancetech.com/people/holland/sap/abap/
    http://www.planetsap.com/download_abap_programs.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/c8/1975cc43b111d1896f0000e8322d00/content.htm
    /people/thomas.weiss/blog/2006/04/03/how-to-define-a-new-badi-within-the-enhancement-framework--part-3-of-the-series
    /people/thomas.weiss/blog/2006/04/18/how-to-implement-a-badi-and-how-to-use-a-filter--part-4-of-the-series-on-the-new-enhancement-framework
    How to develop BADI
    Regards,
    Ram

  • Why is the iPages 5.0 (not beta on iCloud) getting such bad reviews? I was interested in trying it.

    Why is the iPages 5.0 (not beta on iCloud) currently getting such bad reviews? I was interested in trying it on a MacBook Air or Pro.

    mingsai
    We would be grateful if you could point out any errors in the list, but we do check.
    The list does not claim features moved to the System are "missing". There are separate lists of added and changed features.
    There are many people who claim to know what they are talking about but on closer examination it becomes clear they really do not know much about iWork, nor about the features they claim to have "found" in Pages 5.
    I would be hesitant to claim that you were part of the beta testing of Pages 5 for 2 reasons.
    1. Apple does ask you to sign a non-disclosure agreement
    2. You then are part of the problem
    Maybe, now you have disclosed that you were testing, you can explain how on Earth something so bad  was released on an unsuspecting public, with no warning of what Apple had done and that it would alter/damage users' work.
    Peter

  • Why my iphone produces a bug after it renew for OS5.1.1. The bug is when I use message, type a Chinese word, and then using a releveant word, then the program automately closes. Every time I try the same procedure, it definitely closes.

    Why my iphone produces a bug after it renew for OS5.1.1. The bug is when I use message, type a Chinese word, and then using a releveant word, then the program automately closes. Every time I try the same procedure, it definitely closes.

    Nobody knows? Not even administrators?
    Please it would be really nice to have help on that to take all the benefit of the remote app.
    Thank you very much in advance.

  • After updating to 6.0, it takes hours to download a tv show. even in standard definition. any idea why?

    after updating to 6.0, it takes hours to download a tv show. even in standard definition. any idea why?

    Well... you can buy iPhoto 6 for about 80 bucks (and get the rest of the iLife bundle for free to do with as you please), or you can spend about 80 bucks for something like FotoMagico to do some of the things you can do with iPhoto and iMovie. Both are pretty good software bundles -- some people have bought (and use) both.

  • Why do Encore CS5 and Premiere Pro CS5 have intermittant Sync issues?

    I am noticing that Encore CS5 is "buggy" regarding sync issues with material edited by Womble and Corel Video Studio and I am guessing other programs as well?
    In high definition I take AVCHD and  edit in Corel Video Studio.  If I leave the project as one single 42 minute segment and import this asset into Encore CS5, more often than not there are bad sync issues.  To get around this I have to divide the 42 minute project into approximately 6 smaller ones- Each smaller asset ends where I had done the editing.  Encore does not have any problems now with these 6 smaller assets.
    In standard definition I edit in Womble and export as a MPEG2 Program.  Sometimes Encore has a problem with the asset sync and sometimes it does not.  (I am guessing about 20% of my assets end up with a problem).  The same asset if brought into TMP or brought back into Womble does not have any sync issue.  If brought into Premiere Pro CS5 it will exhibit the same behavior as Encore- If Encore has a sync problem, so will Premiere Pro.  So to get around this I then have to go back to the original womble file and break it up into smaller pieces, at every edit point I cut and export the smaller file just after the end of the transition I applied.  With a 6 hour project I may end up with dozens of small files to get around this problem- not very efficient.
    Any ideas how to fix this or why Encore is so buggy?  Would moving the original assets around in Womble- example taking something that was at the end of the timeline and then moving it to the beginning cause these issues for Encore?   Or is there some other cause?
    Encore CS5
    Premiere Pro CS5
    Windows 7 64 BIT
    Quad core
    2.4 GHZ clock speed
    6GB memory
    150 GB free space on drive
    NVIDIA GEFORCE 8500 card

    I've used VideoReDo in the past, which I believe has some similar strategies to Womble.  I found when I tested streams, that there were often problems in the source streams, and that the fix was not 100 percent.
    You may also find such files that are not 100 percent the same length video to audio.
    In any event, the possibility other than Encore being buggy is that the files you are bringing in have problems when Encore tries to validate them.  I'm not saying Encore doesn't have its problems, but clean mpeg files do not have sync issues ordinarily.
    For some scenarios, I like your workflow (edit mpeg files in a frame accurate mpeg editor that is not retranscoding the whole file), but the results are often not consistent.
    You don't say, and I would certainly look at, the nature of the audio stream you are using.  I can not tell you what the problems are, but some streams just do not edit well, even though they may play back okay in some players, but still have issues in Encore and/or Premiere.

  • Best Possible Standard Definition Video

    I usually use Pr to produce MPEG2-DVD files to input to Encore.
    Is there another method using Pr and En to produce the best possible standard DVD video?
    If I have a 60 minute video shot and edited a video in 720, 60P what settings would I use in the Pr Export command to produce MPEG2-DVD files to produce  the best possible video when I use I use Encore to make a standard DVD?  I am trying the following:
    Quality: 100
    Render at maximun Depth: checked
    Minimum Bitrate: 7
    Target Bitrate: 8
    Maximum Bitrate: 9

    My understanding of "Max Bitrate" is that is can be helpful IF your source video had a high color depth, such as 10-bit or 12-bit video, or a lot of graphics. For regular video that started as 8-bit, then Max Depth will not help. Rather, you will want to check the box for "Max Render Quality" as this helps with the downscale quality from HD to SD.
    As for 2-Pass VBR encoding, the first pass analyzes the content of the video for motion and complexity, so that it can allocate the bitrates for various scenes accordingly when it does the actual encode on the second pass. This takes longer, but should yield better results. It encodes more efficiently to squeeze the most quality possible out of the video.
    Thanks
    Jeff Pulera
    Safe Harbor Computers

  • Play iTunes video on STANDARD definition TV?

    This seems as if it should be a simple question, but I haven't had much luck researching an answer!
    I've got a lot of my own homemade videos stored in iTunes. I can easily play them back on my host iMac G5, or over my home network to my MacBook.
    But is there any way to play them over my regular standard-definition TV?
    I've done this by connecting a composite video adapter to the MacBook and cabling it to the TV; it works fine, but ties up the MacBook. I've also transferred them to my iPod and connected that to the TV, which also works fine but isn't very convenient. I'd like to be able to just play videos off the iMac without any extra steps -- the same way you can play audio through an Airport Express connected to a stereo.
    I know an AppleTV would do exactly what I want... IF I had a high-definition TV, but I don't. I've read about adapters for connecting an AppleTV to an SD TV, but they seem both expensive and kludgy. I also know that the AppleTV works with a standard-def TV if your TV has component inputs, but mine doesn't. So the AppleTV doesn't seem to be a solution.
    Any recommendations for a way to do this that definitely works? Thanks...

    Yes, I know, an AppleTV-like device would be exactly what I need... except that I need one that has composite outputs, rather than component and HDMI.
    Are you saying there ain't no such animal, from Roku, Slim Devices, Linksys, anybody...?
    Another thought: Does the Mac mini work with the same type of composite video output adapter I use with my MacBook? If so, it might be more cost-effective to buy a mini and dedicate it for TV use rather than buying an AppleTV plus an HDTV set. (I know I'm going to have to go to HDTV eventually, but the fact is that most standard-definition content looks worse on HDTV than it does on SDTV...)

  • Is There Any Way To Connect My Mid 2009 MacBook To My Standard Definition TV.

    Is There Any Way To Connect My Mid 2009 MacBook To My Standard Definition TV With Scart, S Video & Composite ?
    I Was Going To Connect It With The Apple Video Adapter But Then I Looked At This Web Page That Said It Won't Work With My Model Of MacBook.
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3235?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US
    I Was Hoping Someone Could Sugest Something Else Pehaps Using The VGA Adapter Plus The Video Adapter.
    If Nesacerry I Can A Component Video Scart Adapter.
    Can Anyone Help ?

    I connect an XBox 360 to my LED Cinema display with the Belkin AV360 Mini DisplayPort Converter. I can't imagine why it wouldn't work with the Apple TV. It is limited to 720p, however.
    http://www.amazon.com/Belkin-Mini-DisplayPort-Converter-iMac/dp/B00477ORBK/ref=s r_1_7?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1316343901&sr=1-7
    I hope this helps.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Unable to start essbase app

    Hi, I'm having problems starting an essbase application. all the services are running, everything looks ok. But when trying to start the app or any of the databases of that app it gives an error ' unable to load database' Version is 11.1.1.1 and it's

  • FCP clip time remapping / speed ramping question re realtime after changes?

    Hello All, My first post here! I tried searches for this topic but didn't find.... I wasted hours today messing with the keyframe editor to try and ramp parts of a single clip... first time using this feature and couldn't follow the manual! way too d

  • How to get the data like a tree in t-code /nEC01 ?

    Dear Friends, When using t-code EC01, you can click 'Structure' button, and then click 'Navigation'  button, finally the "SAP organizational objects" will be displayed as a tree - when you double click one item, it will be expaned. My problem is, is

  • Credit limit Block for Sales Order.

    Hi. when customer will create Sales order, it should get blocked for Credit check. & customer will realese it with VKM3 transaction for particular document type . Where will i do the setting? is it Delivery Block 01-Creit Limit check? Reg, Amol

  • I don't want it to "Process Album Artwork"

    Every time I add audio to iTunes it says it's "Processing Album Artwork", and I don't want it to do this - there's not going to be anything in the file, and it's not going to be available on-line. So how can I configure iTunes not to do this?