Why not with XP?

I want to use BH-300 head set with a windows XP operating system laptop, but unable to do so. I am using with Vista laptop. Can some one help me in using the headset with a windows XP operating system laptop

You must find Bluetooth software for your PC's Bluetooth hardware that supports the required Bluetooth profiles for such a headset.
The BH-300 specs say you'd need PC Bluetooth hw and sw with support for:
- Bluetooth 2.0 with EDR specification
- Handsfree 1.5 and Headset 1.1 profiles

Similar Messages

ICloud runs with pc's, why not with my g4 PowerBook?, iCloud runs with pc's, why not with my g4 PowerBook?

I. Have several apple products and used me to sync them all. iCloud will not support my iMac g5, PowerBook g4 and iphone3. It will sync my intel iMac, iPad, ipad2 and iPhone 4s. Yet it will sync with pc,s?
Has anyone else seen this problem and come up with a workaround or alternative ?

With Leopard 10.5, which can run on a G4, you can gain access to iCloud email but can't use all functions. See this thread: https://discussions.apple.com/message/17490155#17490155
If you haven't already, you might look over the iCloud discussions or post your question there. It's at https://discussions.apple.com/community/icloud/icloud_on_my_mac

With Firefox 3.16 I could logIn to corporate website - why not with Firefox 5.0?

I am a Real Estate agent. With the earlier version of Firefox I was using (I think it was 3.16) , I was able to successfully 'log-in' to my company's national web site (http://www.21online.com/public/login ).
When I upgraded to Firefox 5.0, the web site displays OK, but even though I put in the correct user name and password, the site will not log me in. If I use Internet Explorer, I can log in.

I have a similar problem with my sites on ff 3.6.9 and win7, however they are fine with ff and xp they are also fine with ie 6, 7 ,8 , opera, safari and chrome in both xp and win7... I am sorry I don't have a solution... in my case I think its something interfering with the way ff in win7 is looking at css and I have tried recoding to no avail... As my sites look fine with all other browsers I'm hoping the bright sparks out their come up with a fix asap

F-secure browser protection toolbar was compatable with firefox 4 not with firefox 5

f-secure browser protection toolbar was compatable with firefox 4 why not with firefox 5

See f-secure for an update. f-secure needs to keep their Firefox add-ons up-to-date as Mozilla releases new versions of Firefox.

My operating system windows XP not working with photoshop cloud, why not?

I need to add 2 more licences for photoshop cloud and I'm being told my operating system windows XP does not work with Photoshop cloud. We already have 2 pcs using it in our office so why not?
Please help
Roy

Do you have the latest version of iTunes? If not, get it at:
http://www.apple.com/itunes

With previous editions of iTunes for Windows, I could play a CD at the same time as it was being imported. That does not work anymore. Why not, and is there a way to do both with the most current version?

With previous editions of iTunes for Windows, I could play a CD at the same time as it was being imported. That does not seem to work anymore. Why not, and is there a way to do both with the most current version? I am running a Surface Pro 2 with Windows 8.1 and the most recent vesion of iTunes, which, in all other respects, works well. I just can't listen to an album for the 1/2 to 1 hour that it takes to import it into my library.

Two JVM's ? I thought that J2EE worked within a single JVM and run everything in containers. Can you see the two processes?

IPod Touch works with USB 1.0, why not iPad

I just received an iPad as a gift but I have an old 17" iMac with USB 1.0 and it's not syncing with iTunes to setup. My iPod Touch syncs perfectly with 1.0, so why not the iPad? If it won't work, i guess I'll return the iPad and get credit towards a new iMac.

Read the system requirements for the iPad to see if your machines have the correct OS and iTunes version.
http://www.apple.com/ipad/specs/

Why I can't open a sticky note with my PC

I have created a sticky note with my iPhone, but when I access the file through my PC, I can't open it. Why?

Do you have that problem when running in the Firefox SafeMode? 
[http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Safe+Mode] 
''Don't select anything right now, just use "Continue in SafeMode."''
If not, see this: 
[http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes]

HT201328 i contact with at&t to unlock my i phone and they send me approved so would you tel me why not active yest

i contact with at&t to unlock my i phone and they send me approved so would you tel me why not active yest
<Edited by Host>

We are all users like yourself so we would have no way of knowing any more details than you do.
Did you follow the instructions AT&T provided when they informed you the device had been approved for unlocking?

Why not "Web Dynpro *with* ABAP"?

As a newbie I found "Web Dynpro for ABAP" to be confusing. Any ideas why its worded that way? Just curious.

Hi,
because it's a programming model created for abap programming.
If you look at the true content of webdynpro you come out at:
declarative programming of all the navigation, ui, datadisplay and gathering, without
writing the code, but letting the code to be generated.
so it's a concept build for abap,
not with abap (although the classes and interfaces are)
grtz,
Koen

Why not to be unlocked iPhone working with GSM and CDMA/LTE in one device?

why not to be unlocked iPhone working with GSM and CDMA/LTE in one device?

I'll explain, does Verizon unlocked iPhone 5s work with CDMA networks (with SIM or without SIM), and if I travlled to another country that provide GSM operators, does the phone will work with GSM SIM normally?

Why not to use static methods - with example

Hi Everyone,
I'd like to continue the below thread about "why not to use static methods"
Why not to use static methods
with a concrete example.
In my small application I need to be able to send keystrokes. (java.awt.Robot class is used for this)
I created the following class for these "operations" with static methods:
public class KeyboardInput {
     private static Robot r;
     static {
          try {
               r = new Robot();
          } catch (AWTException e) {
               throw new RuntimeException(e + "Robot couldn't be initialized.");
     public static void wait(int millis){
          r.delay(millis);
     public static void copy() {
          r.keyPress(KeyEvent.VK_CONTROL);
          r.keyPress(KeyEvent.VK_C);
          r.keyRelease(KeyEvent.VK_C);
          r.keyRelease(KeyEvent.VK_CONTROL);
     public static void altTab() {
          r.keyPress(KeyEvent.VK_ALT);
          r.keyPress(KeyEvent.VK_TAB);
          r.keyRelease(KeyEvent.VK_TAB);
          r.keyRelease(KeyEvent.VK_ALT);
               // more methods like paste(), tab(), shiftTab(), rightArrow()
}Do you thinks it is a good solution? How could it be improved? I've seen something about Singleton vs. static methods somewhere. Would it be better to use Singleton?
Thanks for any comments in advance,
lemonboston

maheshguruswamy wrote:
lemonboston wrote:
maheshguruswamy wrote:
I think a singleton might be a better approach for you. Just kill the public constructor and provide a getInstance method to provide lazy initialization.Thanks maheshguruswamy for advising on the steps to create a singleton from this class.
Could you maybe advise also about why do you say that it would be better to use singleton? What's behind it? Thanks!In short, it seems to me that a single instance of your class will be able to coordinate actions across your entire application. So a singleton should be enough.But that doesn't answer why he should prefer a singleton instead over a bunch of static methods. Functionally the two are almost identical. In both cases there's only one "thing" on which to call methods--either a single instance of the class, or the class itself.
To answer the question, the main reason to use a Singleton over a classful of static methods is the same reason the drives a lot of non-static vs. static decisions: Polymorphism.
If you use a Singleton (and and interface), you can do something like this:
KeyboardInput kbi = get_some_instance_of_some_class_that_implements_KeyboardInput_somehow_maybe_from_a_factory();And then whatever is calling KBI's public methods only has to know that it has an implementor of that interface, without caring which concrete class it is, and you can substitute whatever implementation is appropriate in a given context. If you don't need to do that, then the static method approach is probably sufficient.
There are other reasons that may suggest a Singleton--serialization, persistence, use as a JavaBean pop to mind--but they're less common and less compelling in my experience.
And finally, if this thing maintains any state between method calls, although you can handle that with static member variables, it's more in keeping with the OO paradigm to make them non-static fields of an instance of that class.

Why not use "new" operator with strings

why we not use new when declaring a String .because in java String are treated as objects. we use new operator for creating an object in java .
and same problem wiht array when we declare array as well as initialize .here we are alse not using new for array
why

Strings aren't just treated as objects, Strings are Objects.
As for why not using new for Strings, you can, if you want.:
String str = "this is a string";
and
String str = new String("this is a string");
do the same thing (nitty-gritty low level details about literals aside). Use whatever you like, but isn't it simpler not to type new String(...) since you still need to type the actual string?
As for arrays, you can use new:
int[] ints = new int[10];
or
int[] ints = { 0, 1, 2, 3, ..., 9 };
But the difference here is you are creating an empty array in the first one, the second creates and fills the array with the specified values. But which to you often depends on what you are doing.

Why is my airportxpr only working with Itunes and not with another music program

why is my airportxpr only working with Itunes and not with another music program??
I can not select/see other outputs in my sound selector.

You have not indicated which OS or which music program you have so I have listed a program called Airfoil to try for both Windows and Mac - it may work for you
for Windows - http://rogueamoeba.com/airfoil/windows/
for Mac - http://rogueamoeba.com/airfoil/mac/

Does McAfee siteadvisor work with Firefox - if not, why not?

does McAfee siteadvisor work with Firefox - if not, why not? Is there a way to make it work?

No, it is blocklisted by Mozilla due to that Site Advisor extension being the #2 cause of crashing the Firefox 5.0 betas. McAfee was notified of the problem long before that extension was added to the blocklist. Now it is up to them to fix it. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/blocked/
I have read that McAfee is working on a re-written version that is projected to be available in the 3rd week of July.

Why not with XP?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for