Why this select statement is failing

Hi to all experts.
Im not able to understand why this select statement is not fetching the record with this parameters. When i give the same parameters in se11 table t512w.. It has one record, but here the sy-subrc Value is 4.
select * from t512w where molga EQ '15'
         and lgart in g_lgart01
       and endda gt pn-endda
   and begda lt pn-endda.

Dear Mohamed,
This Select Statement is bound to Fail. When you are doing a select * from T512W, you intend to get a single record from T512W into the work area T512W which you have declared using TABLES statement. So, here you need to use Select single instead of Select *
If you want more data, then you declare an internal table, say gt_t512w type standard table of t512w and use "
Select from T512W
Into TABLE GT_T512W
WHERE ........
Hope this solves your problem.
Regards,
Amit Sharma

Similar Messages

How to use bind variable in this select statement

Hi,
I have created this procedure where table name and fieldname is variable as they vary, therefore i passed them as parameter. This procedure will trim leading (.) if first five char is '.THE''. The procedure performs the required task. I want to make select statement with bind variable is there any possibility to use a bind variable in this select statement.
the procedure is given below:
create or replace procedure test(tablename in varchar2, fieldname IN varchar2)
authid current_user
is
type poicurtype is ref cursor;
poi_cur poicurtype;
sqlst varchar2(250);
THEVALUE NUMBER;
begin
     sqlst:='SELECT EMPNO FROM '||TABLENAME||' WHERE SUBSTR('||FIELDNAME||',1,5)=''.THE ''';
     DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE(SQLST);
OPEN POI_CUR FOR SQLST ;
LOOP
     FETCH POI_CUR INTO THEVALUE;
          EXIT WHEN POI_CUR%NOTFOUND;
          DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE(THEVALUE);
          SQLST:='UPDATE '||TABLENAME|| ' SET '||FIELDNAME||'=LTRIM('||FIELDNAME||',''.'')';
          SQLST:=SQLST|| ' WHERE EMPNO=:X';
          DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE(SQLST);
               EXECUTE IMMEDIATE SQLST USING THEVALUE;
END LOOP;
COMMIT;
END TEST;
Best Regards,

So you want to amend each row individually? Is there some reason you're trying to make this procedure run as slow as possible?
create or replace procedure test (tablename in varchar2, fieldname in varchar2)
authid current_user
is
   sqlst      varchar2 (250);
   thevalue   number := 1234;
begin
   sqlst := 'update ' || tablename || ' set ' || fieldname || '= ltrim(' || fieldname || ',''.'') where substr(' || fieldname
      || ',1,5) = ''.THE ''';
   dbms_output.put_line (sqlst);
   execute immediate sqlst;
end test;will update every row that satisfies the criteria in a single statement. If there are 10 rows that start with '.THE ' then it will update 10 rows.

In how many ways we can filter this select statement to improve performance

Hi Experts,
This select statement taking 2.5 hrs in production, Can we filter the where condition, to improve the performance.Plz suggest with coding ASAP.
select * from dfkkop into table t_dfkkop
           where   vtref   like 'EPC%'        and
               ( ( augbd      = '00000000'   and
                   xragl      = 'X' )
                           or
                 ( augbd between w_clrfr and w_clrto ) ) and
                   augrd      ne '03'         and
                   zwage_type in s_wtype .
Regards,
Sam.

if it really takes 2.5 hours, try the followingtry to run the SQL trace and
select *
          into table t_dfkkop
          from dfkkop
          where vtref like 'EPC%'
          and augbd = '00000000' and xragl
         and augrd ne '03'
         and zwage_type in s_wtype .
select *
          appending table t_dfkkop
          from dfkkop
          where vtref like 'EPC%'
         and augbd between w_clrfr and w_clrto
         and augrd ne '03'
         and zwage_type in s_wtype .
Do a DESCRIBE TABLE after the first SELECT and after the second,
or run an SQL Trace.
What is time needed for both parts, how many records come back, which index is used.
Siegfried

How to optimize this select statement its a simple select....

how to optimize this select statement as the records in earlier table is abt i million
and this simplet select statement is not executing and taking lot of time
SELECT guid
 stcts
INTO table gt_corcts
FROM corcts
FOR all entries in gt_mege
WHERE /sapsll/corcts~stcts = gt_mege-ctsex
and /sapsll/corcts~guid_pobj = gt_Sagmeld-guid_pobj.
regards
Arora

Hi Arora,
Using Package size is very simple and you can avoid the time out and as well as the problem because of memory. Some time if you have too many records in the internal table, then you will get a short dump called TSV_TNEW_PAGE_ALLOC_FAILED.
Below is the sample code.
DATA p_size = 50000
SELECT field1 field2 field3
 INTO TABLE itab1 PACKAGE SIZE p_size
 FROM dtab
 WHERE <condition>
Other logic or process on the internal table itab1
FREE itab1.
ENDSELECT.
Here the only problem is you have to put the ENDSELECT.
How it works
In the first select it will select 50000 records ( or the p_size you gave). That will be in the internal table itab1.
In the second select it will clear the 50000 records already there and append next 50000 records from the database table.
So care should be taken to do all the logic or process with in select and endselect.
Some ABAP standards may not allow you to use select-endselect. But this is the best way to handle huge data without short dumps and memory related problems.
I am using this approach. My data is much more huge than yours. At an average of atleast 5 millions records per select.
Good luck and hope this help you.
Regards,
Kasthuri Rangan Srinivasan

Regarding this select statement

hi,
i am not getting value i write like this select statement
plz check error in this code.
TABLES: VBAK,
vbrk.
TYPES: BEGIN OF TYP_VBAK,
      VBELN TYPE VBELN_VA,
      VBTYP TYPE VBTYP,
      VGBEL TYPE VGBEL,
      END OF TYP_VBAK,
       BEGIN OF TYP_VBRK,
          VBELN TYPE VBELN,
          WAERK TYPE WAERK,
          VKORG TYPE VKORG,
          KNUMV TYPE KNUMV ,
          FKDAT TYPE FKDAT,
          LAND1 TYPE LLAND,
          NETWR TYPE NETWR,
          KUNRG TYPE KUNRG,
          EXNUM TYPE EXNUM,
          MWSBK TYPE MWSBP,
          END OF TYP_VBRK.
DATA: GT_VBAK TYPE TABLE OF TYP_VBAK,
      IT_VBRK TYPE standard TABLE OF TYP_VBRK WITH HEADER LINE.
     LS_VBRK TYPE TYP_VBRK,
SELECT VBELN
         WAERK
         VKORG
         KNUMV
         FKDAT
         LAND1
         NETWR
         KUNRG
         EXNUM
         FROM VBRK INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE IT_VBRK
         WHERE VBELN = '0090060045'.

Check from SE16 whether vbeln = 0090060045 is present in VBRK or not.
Regards,
Joy.

Why would this select statement give an error?

*LOOKUP Z_HELPER
*DIM TGT1 : ACCOUNT="AA_1070100"
*DIM CATEGORY="ACTUAL"
*DIM TIME="2011.JAN"
*ENDLOOKUP
*SELECT(%TGTDEST2%, "[ID]", TARGETDESTINATION, "[UNIQUEIDENTIFIER]"=LOOKUP(TGT))
UniqueIdentifier is a property of Targetdestination dimension. Here is the error its giving:
Validation status of executable file: Failed
- Unclosed quotation mark after the character string '=LOOKUP(TGT'. in:select [ID] from mbrTARGETDESTINATION where [UNIQUEIDENTIFIER]"=LOOKUP(TGT
Validation status of syntax: Failed
- Invalid syntax found; see statements in red

Nilanjan, I changed TGT to TGT1, still same thing. Here is the big picture outcome I am trying to achieve.
Reporting App
Entity   Costcenter    Shipto   Time          Category Account    Signed data
ABC        CO1             USA    2011.jan      Actual     ACT123       200
So data is coming in like this, the business wants to set up rules such as.....when Costcenter is CO1 AND Shipto is USA AND Entity is ABC....Change the shipto from USA to INDIA. These rules have to be able to be updated by a business user, So I cant hardcode these rules. My manager doesnt want to use Stored procedures, so here is what I did....
Z_Helper App(Non reporting App)
Entity Costcenter Shipto   signeddata (other required dimensions are just dummy values)
ABC     CO1            USA       9
Now how does 9 get linked to INDIA? I created a new dimension called TARGETDESTINATION. it has ID(which is nothing but shipto country values), and a property called UNIQUEIDENTIFIER. Unique Identifier basically just assigned a unique value to that shiptocountry member row.
So now I need to write a script logic in reporting app that will look up signed data of 9 in this example, and I was thinking use a select statement to pull INDIA from TARGETDESTINATION dimension.
Let me know if you have any suggestions. thanks.

Why am I getting an error in this Select statement ?

Any reason why this SQL string does not work on Oracle ?
SELECT * From kestjori.vatnshaed_web WHERE TIEINS = '1' AND TIDTIM BETWEEN To_Date('01.01.2000') AND To_Date('27.10.2000');
TIEINS is of the datatype NUMBER(3)
TIDTIM is of the datatype DATE
I am getting this error :
SQLException: [ORACLE][ODBC Oracle Driver][Oracle OCI] ORA-00911: invalid character
With thanks in advance,
Oskar Jensson

i think there is one exact problem in sql and other is optional.
1. u write field
TIEINS is of the datatype NUMBER(3)
but in query in where part u write
where TIEINS = '1'
so problem is of data type.
second optional problem can be removed by given date format in to_Date() function.
like To_Date('27.10.2000','dd.mm.yyyy')
i hope it will help u
bye
<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:<HR>Originally posted by Oskar Jensson ([email protected]):
Any reason why this SQL string does not work on Oracle ?
SELECT * From kestjori.vatnshaed_web WHERE TIEINS = '1' AND TIDTIM BETWEEN To_Date('01.01.2000') AND To_Date('27.10.2000');
TIEINS is of the datatype NUMBER(3)
TIDTIM is of the datatype DATE
I am getting this error :
SQLException: [ORACLE][ODBC Oracle Driver][Oracle OCI] ORA-00911: invalid character
With thanks in advance,
Oskar Jensson<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
null

Getting error while executing this select statement

Hi All,
I am new to this community.
I am getting error whie compiling the below code. Its telling 'Text' is invalid identifier. Also i want to know how can we obtain 'parseable' version of the below query?
my basic intention is to create a trigger header through a select statement and show it the complete text as a single column..
select text from
(select 'CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER '||SUBSTR(column_name,2,4)||'aud
AFTER INSERT
OR UPDATE
OF '||column_name||',
OR DELETE ON '||table_name||'
FOR EACH ROW'
FROM(SELECT lower(REPLACE(column_name,'O_','')) column_name , /*changing O to O_*/
lower(replace(t.table_name,'_A_','_')) table_name,
lower(t.table_name) table_name1,
c.column_id
FROM all_tab_columns c,
(SELECT object_name table_name
FROM all_objects
WHERE object_name LIKE '%/_A/_%' ESCAPE '/') t
WHERE c.table_name(+) = t.table_name
AND SUBSTR(column_name(+),1,2) = 'O_'))

thanks prathamesh. it solved the problem. i have one more question.
as of now it creates single create trigger statement for each column on a table.
example:
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER ust_aud
AFTER INSERT
OR UPDATE
OF cust_id,
OR DELETE ON characteristic_t
FOR EACH ROW
however, i want to create trigger for all columns in a single statement. can you please help me how to do it?
basically want to 'CREATE TRIGGER' for all columns in a table. i am finding difficult how to change my query to suit this!!
i am pasting my original query again for your reference. pls advise...
example:
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER ust_aud
AFTER INSERT
OR UPDATE
OF cust_id,
fixed_item_val,
copy_item_val,
rgn_id,
txn_id,
OR DELETE ON characteristic_t
FOR EACH ROW
ORIGINAL QUERY
select text from
(select 'CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER '||SUBSTR(column_name,2,4)||'aud
AFTER INSERT
OR UPDATE
OF '||column_name||',
OR DELETE ON '||table_name||'
FOR EACH ROW' text
FROM(SELECT lower(REPLACE(column_name,'O_','')) column_name , /*changing O to O_*/
lower(replace(t.table_name,'_A_','_')) table_name,
lower(t.table_name) table_name1,
c.column_id
FROM all_tab_columns c,
(SELECT object_name table_name
FROM all_objects
WHERE object_name LIKE '%/_A/_%' ESCAPE '/') t
WHERE c.table_name(+) = t.table_name
AND SUBSTR(column_name(+),1,2) = 'O_'))

How to convert this select statement into update

Hai All
I have two table Namely Daily_attend , Train_mast
Daily_attend Consist Of fields are Train_mast consist Of fields are
Name varchar Train no var
Empcode Num T_date date
Intime Date Train_name var
Outtime date Late_hrs var
IND_IN Number
IDE_OUT Number
Attend_date date
I need to update IDE_IN In Daily_attend table Depend upon late_hrs in the Train_mast table
I have got Through in select statement This is my select statement
select to_number(TO_DATE(TO_CHAR(Intime,'DD-MON-YYYY')||' '||
TO_CHAR(0815,'0000'),'DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI')+late_hrs/(24*60)-intime
) * 24*60 from dail_Att,train_mast;
How can i convert it to update
Any help is highly appricateable
Thanks In Advance
Regards
Srikkanth.M

Srikkanth,
Try this code. And 1 more thing, i can't see any WHERE condition to join between the 2 tables DAIL_ATT, TRAIN_MAST.
UPDATE DAIL_ATT A SET A.IDE_IN = (SELECT TO_NUMBER(TO_DATE(TO_CHAR(INTIME, 'DD-MON-YYYY')|| ' ' || TO_CHAR(0815, '0000'), 'DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI') + LATE_HRS / (24 * 60) - INTIME) * 24 * 60 FROM TRAIN_MAST B WHERE <condition>);Regards,
Manu.
If my response or the response of another was helpful or Correct, please mark it accordingly

Can't figure out the correct syntax for this select statement

Hello,
The following statement works great and gives the desired results:
prompt
prompt Using WITH t
prompt
with t as
 select a.proj_id,
 a.proj_start,
 a.proj_end,
 case when (
 select min(a.proj_start)
 from v b
 where (a.proj_start = b.proj_end)
 and (a.proj_id != b.proj_id)
 is not null then 0 else 1
 end as flag
 from v a
 order by a.proj_start
select proj_id,
 proj_start,
 proj_end,
 flag,
 -- the following select statement is what I am having a hard time
 -- "duplicating" without using the WITH clause
 select sum(t2.flag)
 from t t2
 where t2.proj_end <= t.proj_end
 ) s
from t;As an academic exercise I wanted to rewrite the above statement without using the WITH clause, I tried this (among dozens of other tries - I've hit a mental block and can't figure it out):
prompt
prompt without with
prompt
select c.proj_id,
 c.proj_start,
 c.proj_end,
 c.flag,
 -- This is what I've tried as the equivalent statement but, it is
 -- syntactically incorrect. What's the correct syntax for what this
 -- statement is intended ?
 select sum(t2.flag)
 from c t2
 where t2.proj_end <= c.proj_end
 ) as proj_grp
from (
 select a.proj_id,
 a.proj_start,
 a.proj_end,
 case when (
 select min(a.proj_start)
 from v b
 where (a.proj_start = b.proj_end)
 and (a.proj_id != b.proj_id)
 is not null then 0 else 1
 end as flag
 from v a
 order by a.proj_start
 ) c;Thank you for helping, much appreciated.
John.
PS: The DDL for the table v used by the above statements is:
drop table v;
create table v (
proj_id number,
proj_start date,
proj_end date
insert into v values
 ( 1, to_date('01-JAN-2005', 'dd-mon-yyyy'),
 to_date('02-JAN-2005', 'dd-mon-yyyy'));
insert into v values
 ( 2, to_date('02-JAN-2005', 'dd-mon-yyyy'),
 to_date('03-JAN-2005', 'dd-mon-yyyy'));
insert into v values
 ( 3, to_date('03-JAN-2005', 'dd-mon-yyyy'),
 to_date('04-JAN-2005', 'dd-mon-yyyy'));
insert into v values
 ( 4, to_date('04-JAN-2005', 'dd-mon-yyyy'),
 to_date('05-JAN-2005', 'dd-mon-yyyy'));
insert into v values
 ( 5, to_date('06-JAN-2005', 'dd-mon-yyyy'),
 to_date('07-JAN-2005', 'dd-mon-yyyy'));
insert into v values
 ( 6, to_date('16-JAN-2005', 'dd-mon-yyyy'),
 to_date('17-JAN-2005', 'dd-mon-yyyy'));
insert into v values
 ( 7, to_date('17-JAN-2005', 'dd-mon-yyyy'),
 to_date('18-JAN-2005', 'dd-mon-yyyy'));
insert into v values
 ( 8, to_date('18-JAN-2005', 'dd-mon-yyyy'),
 to_date('19-JAN-2005', 'dd-mon-yyyy'));
insert into v values
 ( 9, to_date('19-JAN-2005', 'dd-mon-yyyy'),
 to_date('20-JAN-2005', 'dd-mon-yyyy'));
insert into v values
 (10, to_date('21-JAN-2005', 'dd-mon-yyyy'),
 to_date('22-JAN-2005', 'dd-mon-yyyy'));
insert into v values
 (11, to_date('26-JAN-2005', 'dd-mon-yyyy'),
 to_date('27-JAN-2005', 'dd-mon-yyyy'));
insert into v values
 (12, to_date('27-JAN-2005', 'dd-mon-yyyy'),
 to_date('28-JAN-2005', 'dd-mon-yyyy'));
insert into v values
 (13, to_date('28-JAN-2005', 'dd-mon-yyyy'),
 to_date('29-JAN-2005', 'dd-mon-yyyy'));
insert into v values
 (14, to_date('29-JAN-2005', 'dd-mon-yyyy'),
 to_date('30-JAN-2005', 'dd-mon-yyyy'));

Hi, John,
Not that you asked, but as you proabably know, analytic functions are much better at doing this kind of thing.
You may be amazed (as I continually am) by how simple and efficient these queries can be.
For example:
WITH got_grp AS
 SELECT proj_id, proj_start, proj_end
 , proj_end - SUM (proj_end - proj_start) OVER (ORDER BY proj_start) AS grp
 FROM v
SELECT ROW_NUMBER () OVER (ORDER BY grp) AS proj_grp
, MIN (proj_start) AS proj_start
, MAX (proj_end) AS proj_end
FROM got_grp
GROUP BY grp
ORDER BY proj_start
;Produces the results you want:
PROJ_GRP PROJ_START PROJ_END
 1 01-Jan-2005 05-Jan-2005
 2 06-Jan-2005 07-Jan-2005
 3 16-Jan-2005 20-Jan-2005
 4 21-Jan-2005 22-Jan-2005
 5 26-Jan-2005 30-Jan-2005This is problem is an example of Neighbor-Defined Groups . You want to GROUP BY something that has 5 distinct values, to get the 5 rows above, but there's nothing in the table itself that tells you to which group each row belongs. The groups are not defined by any column in hte table, but by relationships between rows. In this case, a row is in the same group as its neighbor (the row immediatly before or after it when sorted by proj_start or proj_end) if proj_end of the earlier row is the same as proj_start of the later row. That is, there is nothing about 03-Jan-2005 that says the row with proj_id=2 is in the first group, or even that it is in the same group with its neighbor, the row with proj_id=3. Only the relation between those rows, the fact that the earlier row has end_date=03-Jan-2005 and the later row has start_date=03-Jan-2003, that says these neighbors belong to the same group.
You're figuring out when a new group starts, and then counting how many groups have already started to see to which group each row belongs. That's a prefectly natural procedural way of approaching the problem. But SQL is not a procedural language, and sometimes another approach is much more efficient. In this case, as in many others, a Constant Difference defines the groups. The difference between proj_end (or proj_start, it doesn't matter in this case) and the total duratiojn of the rows up to that date determines a group. The actual value of that difference means nothing to you or anybody else, so I used ROW_NUMBER in the query above to map those distinct values into consecutive integers 1, 2, 3, ... which are a much simpler way to identify the groups.
Note that the query above only requires one pass through the table, and only requires one sub-query. It does not need a WITH clause; you could easily make got_grp an in-line view.
If you used analytic functions (LEAD or LAG) to compute flag, and then to compute proj_grp (COUNT or SUM), you would need two sub-queries, one for each analytic function, but you would still only need one pass through the table. Also, those sub-queries could be in-line views; yiou would not need to use a WITH clause.

Whats wrong in this select statement

SELECT A~BUKRS
       A~FKART
       A~FKDAT
       A~VBELN
       B~POSNR
       B~MATNR
       B~MEINS
       B~FKIMG
       INTO TABLE IT_DATA
       FROM VBRK AS A INNER JOIN VBRP AS B ON BVBELN = AVBELN
       WHERE A~BUKRS = P_BUKRS AND
             A~FKART IN S_FKART AND
             A~FKDAT IN S_FKDAT AND
             B~MATNR IN S_MATNR.
i am getting dump in this select statement

Error analysis
The data read during a SELECT access could not be inserted into the
target field.
Either conversion is not supported for the target field's type or the
target field is too short to accept the value or the data are not in a
form that the target field can accept
000890   FORM GET_DATA.
000900
000910
000920
000930   SELECT A~BUKRS
000940          A~FKART
000950          A~FKDAT
000960          A~VBELN
000970          B~POSNR
000980          B~MATNR
000990          B~MEINS
001000          B~FKIMG
001010          INTO TABLE IT_DATA
001020          FROM VBRK AS A INNER JOIN VBRP AS B ON BVBELN = AVBELN
001030          WHERE A~BUKRS = P_BUKRS AND
001040                A~FKART IN S_FKART AND
001050                A~FKDAT IN S_FKDAT AND
    >                B~MATNR IN S_MATNR.
001070
001080
001090
001100    DESCRIBE TABLE IT_DATA1 LINES LINES.
001110   IF LINES = 0.
001120   MESSAGE I001 WITH 'No data available for the selection'.
001130   ENDIF.
001140
001150   CLEAR : LINES.
001160
001170
001180
001190   ENDFORM.                    " GET_DATA
001200
the above is the dump

Why does this select statement fail.....

declare
t_name varchar2(100):='america';
begin
execute immediate '
select * from'|| t_name;
end;

Because it looks like you need to add a space after 'from' and add an INTO CLAUSE?
introduction to bulk pl/sql enhancements in 9i

Help me to solve this. select statement!

hello alll
is there any functional module which gives me the BELNR(of bseg) by passing the vbeln.
yeah ...we can do tht by passing bseg table ,,,,but its taking loads of time to give me the output as its not a primary key or secondary key.....
when i m using this condition in the prog i cannot use inner join as its a cluster table . if i m writing a condition it is effecting my prog performance
this statement is really taking long time to process.
in bseg table as vbeln is not primary key or seconday key, i guess thz the reason it is taking so much time ,,,
can anyone help me to sort this out... ??
any fun mod to get the data of bseg cluster table by giving vbeln?/
or any other conditions to reduce the processing time?
clear t_vbrkvbrp.
sort t_vbrkvbrp by vbeln.
loop at t_vbrkvbrp.
at new vbeln.
select bukrs belnr vbeln
from bseg
into corresponding fields of table t_temp
where bukrs = t_vbrkvbrp-bukrs
and vbeln = t_vbrkvbrp-vbeln.
endat.
endloop.
SELECT bukrs belnr buzid koart shkzg dmbtr vbeln hkont kunnr werks
FROM bseg
INTO TABLE t_bseg
for all entries in t_temp
WHERE hkont IN s_hkont
AND bukrs = t_temp-bukrs
AND belnr = t_temp-belnr
AND buzid = ' '
AND koart = 'S'
AND shkzg = 'H'.
i need to get the g/l account number and belnr from bseg for the above condition type so i have to use bseg table
as there is no apporpriate index it is scanning the full table ,,,, so can anyone tell me how to create a index or like wise to get the data faster??

Don't use BSEG, use BKPF and fields AWTYP, AWREF which link a financial document to the application and document that generated it. (The "original document" under transaction like FB03)
Example: "RMRP" + invoice number for purchase invoice
In some case you need an intermediate table
Example: from EKPO, EKBE, you get the MKPF records and from them the BKPF/BSEG
For a list of "referenced procedures" Look at TTYP (text table is TTYPT), you will get the code, structure used to build the key (if more than one field) and a function module used to display the origin
Example : MKPF "Material document" structure MKPF_AWKEY function module MB_DOCUMENT_SENDER_MKPF
You can also look at your accounting documents found with the "slow" BSEG version of your program and establish a list of AWTYP used in you company/customer.
An other way, used in some companies, is to append a structure with EBELN field to BSIS and BSAS table, these table are filled via a MOVE-CORRESPONDING statement, so the nesw records will be filled (You may write a program to update past records) then create an index on EBELN on these fields.
Regards
PS: BSEG is a cluster table, so the only real criteria are the primary keys, if you select via EBELN, the program read the whole table, may be correct in Development, but not in Production and there it will be more and more resources consuming. So NEVER select from BSEG vithout the primary keys, use the secondary tables : BSIS/BSAS, BSIM, etc.

Why this SQL statement is wrong?

When I trying update my database using following statement:
String query = "UPDATE Flights" +
"SET AircraftType ='" + inputPanel.type.getText() +
"', EnterPoint = '" + inputPanel.point.getText() +
"',GroundSpeed = " + Integer.parseInt(inputPanel.speed.getText()) +
",Altitude =" + Integer.parseInt(inputPanel.altitude.getText()) +
"WHERE FlightNumber =" + inputPanel.flight.getText();
//where speep and altitude are ints
it always say:Syntax error in UPDATE statement.
I cannot understand why because this is a standard SQL statement I think.
Please help me!
Thanks in advance

this part is causing you problems:
"WHERE FlightNumber =" + inputPanel.flight.getText();
if FlightNumber is an integer then you should convert the text to an int:
"WHERE FlightNumber =" + Integer.parseInt(inputPanel.flight.getText());
or if it is a String then:
"WHERE FlightNumber ='" + inputPanel.flight.getText()+ "'";
Jamie

How to make this select statement faster?

this statement is really taking long time to process.
in bseg table as vbeln is not primary key or seconday key, i guess thz the reason it is taking so much time ,,,
can anyone help me to sort this out... ??
any fun mod to get the data of bseg cluster table by giving vbeln?/
or any other conditions to reduce the processing time?
clear t_vbrkvbrp.
sort t_vbrkvbrp by vbeln.
loop at t_vbrkvbrp.
at new vbeln.
select bukrs belnr vbeln
 from bseg
 into corresponding fields of table t_temp
 where bukrs = t_vbrkvbrp-bukrs
 and vbeln = t_vbrkvbrp-vbeln.
endat.
endloop.
SELECT bukrs belnr buzid koart shkzg dmbtr vbeln hkont kunnr werks
 FROM bseg
 INTO TABLE t_bseg
 for all entries in t_temp
 WHERE hkont IN s_hkont
 AND bukrs = t_temp-bukrs
 AND belnr = t_temp-belnr
 AND buzid = ' '
 AND koart = 'S'
 AND shkzg = 'H'.
i need to get the g/l account number for the above condition type so i have to use bseg table
Message was edited by:
 shahid mohammed syed

Shahid,
Usually BSEG SELECTs are slow as it is a Clu8ster table. More over you are not passing the PKeys in the WHERE condition. That's alcso one reason for slow retrieval. You can also use the table BSIS (Accounting: Secondary Index for G/L Accounts) for the G/L accounts. But first of all, I suggest you cnange your where condition as below:
SELECT bukrs belnr buzid koart shkzg dmbtr vbeln hkont kunnr werks
FROM bseg
INTO TABLE t_bseg
for all entries in t_temp
WHERE bukrs = t_temp-bukrs
AND belnr = t_temp-belnr
AND buzid = ' '
AND koart = 'S'
AND shkzg = 'H'
AND hkont IN s_hkont.
Not much diff. I just re-ordered the condition based on the order of BSEG fields... Lemme know if it helps.
Regards,
Karthik
Message was edited by:
 Karthik

Why this select statement is failing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for