Windows Page file and SQL AWE Correct Configuration

Hi everyone,
I have SQL ENT. 2005 and Windows ENt w2k3 I Have 9 Gig of Physical Mem
2 Dual Processor 2x72 GIG Raid 1  SCSI 3x72 Raid 5, I got slow performance on my SAP B1 2005 my current database is 45gig
current config and stats
Windows  Virtual Mem  config is  min 1024 max 2048
SQL AWE min 5120 max 6144
boot.ini config
multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(1)\WINDOWS="Windows Server 2003, Enterprise" /noexecute=optout /fastdetect /PAE
can anyone help me if this is correct, need your advice whats the best practice between AWE and VM Pagefile.sys
clifford

2046MB of pagefile is really not enough. increase to 20GB is possible.

Similar Messages

  • How to run a remote windows dll files and the drivers of the system using j

    Dear Friends,
    I need some valuable info regd how to run a remote windows dll files and the drivers of the system using java
    reply regd thanking you

    Please don't make duplicate posts like this.

  • How to run windows dll files and driver loaded in remote system?

    Dear Friends,
    I need some valuable info regd how to run a remote windows dll files and the drivers of the system using java
    reply regd thanking you

    Please don't make duplicate posts like this.

  • It is compatible Obi 11g  with Windows Server  2012 and Sql Server 2012?

    Hi every
    Please help with two questions.
    1. - Obi 11g is supported on Windows Server 2012 and SQL Server 2012?
    There a compatibility matrix which mention compatibility with versions 2012?
    2. - is feasible to install Obi 11g in separate server and install weblogic on another server?
    I appreciate the prompt response
    Regards
    Pedro

    Hi Pedro,
    As of November 2012 Compatibility Matrix released by Oracle for OBI 11.1.1.x Windows 2012 and SQL Server 2012 were not supported. It was supported on 2008 Windows and SQL Server.
    We can have weblogic and OBI server's on 2 different machines. The approach is to opt software only install. the link below will give more details:
    http://obieeelegant.blogspot.com/2012/07/obiee111160-software-only-installation.html
    Let me know if this helped.
    Regards,
    Jay

  • Windows Server 2008 and SQL Server 2008 R2 - ?? for replication with Oracle

    Hello:
    I am running Windows Server 2008 and SQL Server 2008 R2 - 64 bit
    I need to replicate data between the SQL 2008 and Oracle 11.2 ?? with Oracle being the publisher
    I also would lile SqlPlus installed on the server.
    I need a definite answer as to what I should download from the Oracle download area. There are just so many packages and so many version I dont know what to download.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Currently Microsoft Windows Server 2008 and SQL Server 2008 are not supported for SAP Business One.
    For detailed information about all supported platforms, we have the following link for your reference:
    www.service.sap.com/smb/sbo >product availability > supported platforms.
    Regarding the information on the service marketplace this is updated on a regular basis and provides the most up to date information regarding the supported platforms for Business One.
    Platforms not mentioned in this documentation are not supported.
    hope it helps,
    Regards,
    Ladislav
    SAP Business One Forum Team

  • SAP R3 4.5b running on Windows 2008 R2 and SQL 2008 R2

    Hi
    Trying to obtain information on compatability of SAP R3 4.5b running on Windows 2008 R2 and SQL 2008 R2 ?
    I understand that SAP may not support this? But would it actually work? Assuming we have a third party supporting it?
    Jay

    Hi Jay,
    You may check the support in PAM http://service.sap.com/pam.
    Ideally SAP shall not support this environment.
    Reason being:
    1) SAP kernel for R3 4.5b not available for windows 2008 R2
    2) Compatible database library not available for R3 4.5b on MSSQL 2008 R2.
    with above 2 reason you shall not be able to install R3 4.5b on Windows 2008R2 with MSSQL 2008 R2 database.
    Regards,
    Deepak Kori

  • BPC 7.5 SP4 Support for Windows 2008 R2 and SQL 2008 R2

    The release notes for BPC 7.5M SP04 state that support has been added for both Windows 2008 R2 and SQL 2008 R2.
    For SQL 2008 R2, there is nothing in the feature pack described as "SQL 2005 Backward Compatibility Components" - which was a required piece for  BPC 7/7.5 on SQL 2008. Is the SQL 2008 version still a requirement, or does BPC 7.5 now not need the Backward Compatibility components?
    Also, the ReprotViewer executable that is packaged with BPC 7.5 is the one for SQL 2008- will that work when installing SQL 2008 R2?
    thanks,
    Tony DeStefanis
    Column5 Consulting

    Hi,
    we have the same environment (BPC 7.5 SP4 on Windows 2008 R2 64 bit and SQL Server 2008 R2 64bit).
    we are developping our application-set and for the moment we have no problem.
    regards
    massimo

  • I used automator to rename some pages files, and now they can't be opened

    I used automator to remove some text from the filenames of a group of pages files, and now they can't be opened. What went wrong?

    Did you by any chance remove the file type extension?
    Walt

  • Website page displays and javascript runs correctly in IE8 but not in Firefox 3.6.10

    website page displays and javascript runs correctly in IE8 but not in Firefox 3.6.10

    Can you post a link?
    Then we can take a look.

  • I just attached a pages file and email to gmail account and try open in windows but i cant open it it is in jpg format and pdf how can i open it in windows as well

    i emailed a pages file  through gmail which cant be opened in windows computer why

    Because a Windows computer doesn't have Pages or anything to convert it.
    Export the file from Pages into whatever format would be appropriate for your windows users (PDF, possibly Word if they have that program). Then, send that file instead.

  • Workflows 2013 and SQL Report Services: Configure on Independent Servers or Existing App Servers?

    Currently, my SharePoint 2013 Farm has Workflows 2013 and SQL Report Services installed on app servers, along with other applications. Workflows 2013 isn't working correctly (installed prior to my coming on board with the organization), I'm assuming it
    is a configuration issue, but rather than re-configure, I've read that is recommended to be a standalone server. It was also recommended by a MSFT rep that our report services have its own independent server. Currently, Report Services is also installed on
    an app server that runs other applications on the farm.
    Has anyone had any experience with installing Workflows 2013 and/or SQL Report Services on independent vs. existing application servers?
    Additionally, my existing application servers have 24 GB of RAM (I believe the recommendation for SharePoint production environments is 12 GB), should I plan for the potentially new servers (Workflows and Report Services) to also have 24 GB of RAM? Not really
    sure if it will be needed if they have dedicated tasks.
    Thanks for any input you can provide!

    It entirely depends on load. WFM will work just fine installed on servers in the SharePoint farm. SSRS preferably should go on the end-user facing servers for better performance.
    The questions you're asking are all "it depends" :)
    Trevor Seward
    Follow or contact me at...
    &nbsp&nbsp
    This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

  • Windows 2003 server and SQL 2008

    Hi
    Does SAP Business one support windows 2008 and sql 2008 platforms?
    When i checked the partner portal it says that these platforms are not supported.Is there any update?
    Regards
    Louis

    Hello Louis,
    The only way to determine this is via the supported platforms page in the portal. This is the most up to date, and will include information for the future when this data is available. So for not I would only plan with what information is available.
    Regards,
    Paul Finneran
    SAP Business One Forums Team

  • Change the IP Addresss of Servers that are members of a Windows Failover Cluster and SQL cluster

    Hi all,
    I have 3-nodes Windows Server 2012 R2 Cluster, on top of it I have two clustered named SQL 2012 instances installed. We need to change the IPs and subnet for the three physical servers incorporated in the Windows cluster. What will be the impact on
    the Windows and SQL clusters? What extra configuration is needed in both Windows and SQL clusters to make sure the service will not fail after changing the IPs?

    A similar question was answered
    here.
    The impact is that your Windows and SQL Server failover clustered instances will be offline during configuration so you need to schedule downtime. Plus, your client applications will not be able to find the new IP addresses immediately, depending on your
    DNS TTL value. Work with your network/systems engineers to find out what this value is or validate the existing TTL values on your clustered resources by checking the HostRecordTTL property value. A workaround here is to set the HostRecordTTL property values
    of your SQL Server network name to a very low value, say 1 minute, and then change it back to the current one once all of the applications can connect back to them.
    Edwin Sarmiento SQL Server MVP | Microsoft Certified Master
    Blog |
    Twitter | LinkedIn
    SQL Server High Availability and Disaster Recover Deep Dive Course

  • MSXML6.dll method"SEND" don't work in Windows Server 2012 and SQL 2008R2

    Hi all,
    I have a SP to send a WebService data
    It works fine on Windows 2008R2 server and also on Windows Server 2003.
    moving it on Windows Server 2012 with SQL 2008R2 express (32bit) or SQL 2012 express (32bit), it doesn't work anymore.
    Below the SP.
    -- =============================================
    -- Author: Giancarlo MADA Service 2008
    -- Create date: 09/09/2008
    -- Description: Web Service Interface
    -- =============================================
    CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[spmd_HTTPRequest]
    @URI varchar(2000) = '',
    @methodName varchar(50) = '', -- POST, GET
    @requestBody varchar(8000) = '', -- XML Document envelope
    @SoapAction varchar(255),
    @UserName nvarchar(100), -- Domain\UserName or UserName
    @Password nvarchar(100),
    @responseText varchar(8000) output
    as
    SET NOCOUNT ON
    IF @methodName = ''
    BEGIN
    select FailPoint = 'Method Name must be set'
    return
    END
    set @responseText = 'FAILED'
    DECLARE @objectID int
    DECLARE @hResult int
    DECLARE @source varchar(255), @desc varchar(255)
    EXEC @hResult = sp_OACreate 'MSXML2.ServerXMLHTTP.6.0', @objectID OUT
    IF @hResult <> 0
    BEGIN
    EXEC sp_OAGetErrorInfo @objectID, @source OUT, @desc OUT
    SELECT hResult = convert(varbinary(4), @hResult),
    source = @source,
    description = @desc,
    FailPoint = 'Create failed',
    MedthodName = @methodName
    goto destroy
    return
    END
    -- open the destination URI with Specified method
    EXEC @hResult = sp_OAMethod @objectID, 'open', null, @methodName, @URI, 'false', @UserName, @Password
    IF @hResult <> 0
    BEGIN
    EXEC sp_OAGetErrorInfo @objectID, @source OUT, @desc OUT
    SELECT hResult = convert(varbinary(4), @hResult),
    source = @source,
    description = @desc,
    FailPoint = 'Open failed',
    MedthodName = @methodName
    goto destroy
    return
    END
    -- set request headers
    EXEC @hResult = sp_OAMethod @objectID, 'setRequestHeader', null, 'Content-Type', 'text/xml;charset=UTF-8'
    IF @hResult <> 0
    BEGIN
    EXEC sp_OAGetErrorInfo @objectID, @source OUT, @desc OUT
    SELECT hResult = convert(varbinary(4), @hResult),
    source = @source,
    description = @desc,
    FailPoint = 'SetRequestHeader failed',
    MedthodName = @methodName
    goto destroy
    return
    END
    -- set soap action
    EXEC @hResult = sp_OAMethod @objectID, 'setRequestHeader', null, 'SOAPAction', @SoapAction
    IF @hResult <> 0
    BEGIN
    EXEC sp_OAGetErrorInfo @objectID, @source OUT, @desc OUT
    SELECT hResult = convert(varbinary(4), @hResult),
    source = @source,
    description = @desc,
    FailPoint = 'SetRequestHeader failed',
    MedthodName = @methodName
    goto destroy
    return
    END
    declare @len int
    set @len = len(@requestBody)
    EXEC @hResult = sp_OAMethod @objectID, 'setRequestHeader', null, 'Content-Length', @len
    IF @hResult <> 0
    BEGIN
    EXEC sp_OAGetErrorInfo @objectID, @source OUT, @desc OUT
    SELECT hResult = convert(varbinary(4), @hResult),
    source = @source,
    description = @desc,
    FailPoint = 'SetRequestHeader failed',
    MedthodName = @methodName
    goto destroy
    return
    END
    -- send the request
    EXEC @hresult = sp_OAMethod @objectID, 'send', NULL, @requestBody
    IF @hResult <> 0
    BEGIN
    EXEC sp_OAGetErrorInfo @objectID, @source OUT, @desc OUT
    SELECT hResult = convert(varbinary(4), @hResult),
    source = @source,
    description = @desc,
    FailPoint = 'Send failed',
    MedthodName = @methodName
    goto destroy
    return
    END
    declare @statusText varchar(1000), @status varchar(1000)
    -- Get status text
    exec sp_OAGetProperty @objectID, 'StatusText', @statusText out
    exec sp_OAGetProperty @objectID, 'Status', @status out
    select @status, @statusText, @methodName
    -- Get response text
    exec sp_OAGetProperty @objectID, 'responseText', @responseText out
    IF @hResult <> 0
    BEGIN
    EXEC sp_OAGetErrorInfo @objectID, @source OUT, @desc OUT
    SELECT hResult = convert(varbinary(4), @hResult),
    source = @source,
    description = @desc,
    FailPoint = 'ResponseText failed',
    MedthodName = @methodName
    goto destroy
    return
    END
    destroy:
    exec sp_OADestroy @objectID
    SET NOCOUNT OFF
    The underlined portion is the one that gives error, reported below.
    "Msxml6.dll 0x80070057 The parameter is incorrect. Send failed POST"
    Previously the SP used MSXML3.dll and also with that it gives the same problem.
    I can't understand what the wrong parameter is.
    Even because, as mentioned at the beginning, everything works fine on windows server 2008R2 and Windows Server 2003
    Some ideas?

    Hello, 
    We have built a dll via CLR on the database. 
    Below is the code.
    If you want to send the file SOAP.dll. Give me an e-mail ..
    USE MydatabaseGO
    /****** Object: SqlAssembly [SOAP] Script Date: 03/05/2014 12:59:14 ******/
    CREATE ASSEMBLY [SOAP]
    AUTHORIZATION [dbo]
    FROM MyPath\SOAP.dll
    WITH PERMISSION_SET = EXTERNAL_ACCESS
    GO
    USE Mydatabase
    GO
    /****** Object: StoredProcedure [dbo].[spmd_HTTPRequest3] Script Date: 03/05/2014 12:53:32 ******/
    CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[spmd_HTTPRequest3]
    @URI [nvarchar](4000),
    @methodName [nvarchar](4000),
    @requestBody [nvarchar](4000),
    @SoapAction [nvarchar](4000),
    @UserName [nvarchar](4000),
    @Password [nvarchar](4000),
    @responseText [nvarchar](4000) OUTPUT
    WITH EXECUTE AS CALLER
    AS
    EXTERNAL NAME [SOAP].[StoredProcedures].[spmd_HTTPRequest3]
    GO
    Now call the new SP called spmd_HTTPRequest3
    By..

  • I saved my document as only .doc but not as a pages file and now I cannot edit anything and half the document looks incredibly screwed up, how did this happen?

    I forgot to save the pages file, I do back up on time machine could a temporary file be in there somewhere? It was a 30+ page custom designed presentatiion that took me two weeks. i cannot believe I only saved it as PDF and .doc! My current theory is that I can only edit the document in pages as a pages file since that is what I had been doing. Please help if anyone has had this problem before or know how I can recover that screen I was working with a few days ago before I saved as a Word doc!!

    Despite what Apple and its employees say Pages is not a 100% replacement for Word.
    Pages files exported to .doc will have minor to major differences.
    You should always have a Pages version. Exporting is only so non Mac and non Pages users may read it, and even there you should use .pdf to keep its appearance as close as possible to the original.
    It sounds like you used a lot of Pages' features which turned out to not have Word equivalents.
    Peter

Maybe you are looking for