Wip Calculation in Collective Order

Hello Sap Gurus,
We have created Collective Production orders in which when we are confirming order production will get automatically confirmed as consumption in superior order.
When we are calculating WIP for superior order, it is giving no values.
Can any one tell why this is happening ?

Dear,
You can check the good issue order wise from IW31.
Also refer my reply from these threads,
[Collective order|Re: Collective Order]
[Collective order GI|Re: Collective Order Processing]
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Similar Messages

WIP calculation for Prod.order with status TECO

Hello all.
My question is the similar to WIP calculation for Prod.order with status DLV
But I need that
- if the Production order has status TECO - the system calculate WIP
- if the Production order has status DLV u2013 the system settle the order.
1. I try to change u201CStatus Numberu201D in TCODE OKGC. But I have receive two different result:
- if I change u201CStatus Numberu201D for status DLV from 3 to 2, then during WIP calculation of the order with status DLV u2013 WIP have been calculated.
- but if I change u201CStatus Numberu201D for status TECO from 4 to 2, then during WIP calculation of the order with status TECO u2013 WIP have been CANSELED.
2. I try to change results analysis key for status TECO from u201CZu201D to u201CFu201D in TCODE OKG3. BUT during WIP calculation the system create error message KJ 363 which require that results analysis key must be change to u201CZu201D
How can I resolve my problem?

Hi,
I don't have the answer if the requirement is that even after producing the materials, till the time accountant checks the order and does this action, it should remain in WIP. Honestly it doesn't make any sense to me or i have not understood this problem. Anyways as per my current understanding I can suggest the following process for your scenario.
Once production is stopped in between the process, the order should be in PDLV status (partial confirmations happened in the order)
Now go and clear the reservations manually from the production order .( delete the component line items from the order). Now depending on whether you are following WIP at actual cost, system will post the difference between credit and debit of that production order as WIP for the month end process.
Once Accountant okays the entries in the production order, he can do the TECO and settle the order. Now WIP will be reversed and variance will be posted.
To avoid the already produced goods mixing up with your other stock, u might want use Quality Management with the help of your PP consultant.
Best Regards
Vimal

Wip calculation in production Order

Hai friends
Can any one tell this 2 tcodes in Co . tell me these two codes KKAX,
KKAO why we use and how to calculate tell me clearly WIP functonality.

Hi,
WIP :
The WIP calculation process valuates the unfinished products (work in process).
In the Product Cost by Order component, the work in process is valuated at actual costs. Work in process is the difference between the debit and credit of an order that has not been completely delivered. This method determines the work in process for each production order by calculating the difference between the actual costs incurred and the actual costs settled (that is, the difference between the debits for goods issues, internal activity allocations, external activities, and overhead on the one hand, and the credits for goods receipts on the other). Once the last part of the order lot has been delivered to stock, any remaining work in process must be canceled so that the order costs can properly be settled to stock.
The status of the order determines whether WIP calculation creates or cancels the work in process.
u2022 If the order has the status REL (released), the system can calculate work in process.
u2022 Once the order receives the status DLV (Delivered) or TECO (Technically completed), the work in process calculated in a previous period is canceled.
for this you have calculate WIP for every order.
KKAX- this T.code is used for single order process.
KKAO-this T.code is used for collective process,here you process by plant.
Hope this is helps you.
Thanks,
Rau

WIP calculation for Sales Order no FI document

Hi,
We are using the MTO scenario with valuated salaes order stock and it wll carry revenue and costs wherein we configured the RA key correctly with valuation method as 01 and we defined all configuration correctlly line ID,s and assignment and posting rules etc,. We have incurred the cost on Prodction order assgined to Sales Order and to calculate the WIP We have done the KKA3 and we run the VA88 it is not psoting any accounting document and it is settling the costs and COPA document is generatig.

Hi,
You might have to check your scenario.
Normally when there is a CO-PA document generated, there is no WIP calculation happening.
The COS/Revenue is being transferred to CO-PA.
Kind Regards
Umapathi G

WIP Consumption in Collective order

Dear All,
We have gone live before 2 months ago, now client wants to implement collective order.
I have gone through the testing of Collective order.but I am facing the problem of WIP,which is not getting consumed .How to do this ?
Please give your valuable suggestion.
Regads,
VIjay

Dear,
You can check the good issue order wise from IW31.
Also refer my reply from these threads,
[Collective order|Re: Collective Order]
[Collective order GI|Re: Collective Order Processing]
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

WIP calculation for Prod.order with status DLV

Dear experts,
Is there any way to change WIP calculation method for Prod.order status ?
In t-code OKGC:: By default system will set:
Order status      Status number         RA type
REL                          2                             WIP Calculation on Basis of Actual Costs
DLV                          3                            Cancel Data of WIP Calculation and Results Ana
PREL                  1                            WIP Calculation on Basis of Actual Costs
TECO                  4                            Cancel Data of WIP Calculation and Results Ana
I can not change any thing in t-code OKGC (gray after insert: CO, RA version, RA key).
As I understanding: Prod.order with status DLV will not be considered to calculate WIP.
But I want to calculate WIP for Prod.order with status DLV. Could you pls guide me how to configure the system?
Thank you!

Hi,
I suppose it is positive variance as the yield from the order is 10 pieces more than the planned quantity of 1000 and it is always a variance and no WIP involved in this case. It can be settled to FI/PCA and to CO-PA by variance categories (if you have configured accordingly)
Therefore the accounting entry would be:
1. Delivery to stock of 10 pieces:
FG Debit
Change in Stock Credit
2. Variances will post the difference:
Change in Stock Debit
Price Difference is Credit
Concerning the valuation method it needs to be tested before it can be implemented.
Kind Regards
Umapathi G

WIP CALCULATION ON PRODUCTION ORDERS

Hi,
I have a problem for some production orders:
WHEN PERFORMING THE WIP CALCULATION (maybe with transaction code KKAO) ON SOME PRODUCTION ORDERS WE ARE GETTING THE FOLLOWING ERROR MESSAGE:
KJ161 "There are values for cost element xxxxxx that are not assigned to any line ID"
Is there anyone that can help us to understand this error message and to solve this problem?
Futher informations:
Considering the report "Orders: Actual/Plan/Variance" (transaction code S_ALR_87012993) I have noticed that this production orders have fot that particular cost element of the error message a negative actual value. This was generated by 1 document for each production order that I can see in transaction code MB23. In this document there is a movement type 531 (Receipt of by-product into unrestricted-use stock).
This document was made by transaction code COGI.
Is it this document that has created the problem for THE WIP CALCULATION?
How can we try to resolve it?
Thank you for all your help.
A.S.

Hi,
Please check the required settings in OKBG. Whether all required cost elements have been defined here?
Hope it will help you to get the clues
Regards,
Jigar

Reverse WIP Calculation on Prod Order

Issue: Cannot set DLFL flag on order because: There is still WIP for ORD.
I Set TECO and settle. Error: Status DLV/TECO was reversed after settlement of period 012 2007
Our Fiscal year 2008 began May 1 2007
Order was DLV in Period 12 FY 2007.
Year-end completed.
Late in May (Per 01/2008) Production Planner - reversed all GI, GR and Confirmation and set DLFL status.
Accountant discovered this, removed DLFL and tried to settle order properly, resulting in error: Status DLV/TECO was reversed after settlement of period 012 2007
Can't set DLFL, because of WIP.
Can't settle order to Variance because of error.
Can't reverse settlement from 2007 in 2008
Can't open 2007 to reverse settlement.
I would like to reverse WIP posting and then set DLFL status.
Any thoughts on how to do this?
Thanks
Althea

Hello,
If the WIP on a production order (with full settlement) is cancelled depends on the status of the production order. In standard this is DLV or TECO and is maintained in the valuation method in Customizing.
After the according status has been set on the order the WIP-calculation has to be executed again which will offset the WIP amount (i.e. 100 by -100). Thereupon variances and settlement have to be executed as well. After the settlement the WIP account in FI should have been offset as well.
Regards, Michael

Collective order - manuell booking

Hello all!
Is there a way to use collective orders without automatic booking, but with manual booking.
We like the idea of the linked production orders and the way it is handled. Our problem is,
that we need the semi-finished goods on stock. So we have to book them with MIGO.
Is there any other way to link the production orders and do physical bookings (like in every
standard production order)?
Thankful for all help,
Barbara

Hi,
In a collective order, goods movements (GI & GR) are usually not required for assemblies that are directly produced.
When u do the confirmation for Lower level order, Produed assemblies will be issued to Higher level order directly, so manual goods issue not possible for assemblies to Higher level order.
U can confirm this, with Higher level order cost analysis after the confirmation of lower level order.
So need not issue the produced assembly to higher level order using the MB1A.
Only thing u have to activate Collective order with goods movements object box for Order type at OPJH .
For Lower level order (Assembly order ) good issue for procured components of assembly can be done using MB1A with MVt type 261.
Dependencies :
For collective orders without automatic goods movements you must take organizational measures to ensure that the WIP calculation and the settlement of orders are each carried out twice. You cannot carry out a variance calculation for collective orders without automatic goods movements. You cannot carry out a standard cost calculation for a collective order without automatic goods movements.
You can find detailed information on collective orders in the document Cost object accounting -> Order-related Product Controlling.
Thanks,
Mohit

Report to see WIP calculation details for sales order

Hi,
I want to know which is the best report to see the details of WIP calculation for a sales order. There is a WIP posting of 1 million to a sales order and i want to understand how this amount was computed.

Hi,
Yes when i went there and call up the line items report i got the following error :-
Display of debits for object type SDI is not included
Message no. KD232
Diagnosis
You want to display a report for the current sender. This function is currently only possible for the following object types:
Cost Object
Orders
WBS Elements

Make to order WIP calculation with minus WIP

Dear Grus!
I'm in the make to order senario ,and using actual cost in WIP calculation.
finished goods using standard cost valuation.
Input 1000, output ( 100 USD *15EA), wip qty is 5EA.
now WIP become minus, so system generates error message.
How I should configure in a correct way?
Thank you ~
Lynn

Thanks for your answers,
The message number is
Plan cost <= actual cost. Cannot use method of apportionment (K,R)
Message no. KJ228
Sum across all apportionment numbers = 0. Cannot use MOA (K,R)
Message no. KJ233
MOA for reserves for unrealized costs in period 005 2009 was changed
Message no. KJ221
Negative wip indicatest that 1) you are not finished with the order and 2) at the WIP point in time, more value has been credited to the order that was issued to the order.
This could be due to failed goods movements or incomplete confirmations, out of date cost estimates, etc.
and standard cost is a little bit high, so the WIP balance is minus.
Br
Lynn

Project commintment as real in WIP calculation

Hi.
In our company we want to consider the commitment as real in WIP calculation, the problem is that i have customized it in OKG3, by puting field Commitments equa to A, because I want to consider purchase requisitions, and purchase orders commitment.
The problem is that it is not working. Does anyone know if is there something else that i have to do.
Of course if it is impossible to be done in a standard way, i can use and exit, but would like not to.
Thanks.
Alex

Hi Alex,
You can try the Results Analysis type 'F-WIP calculation on the basis of Actual costs' in the expert mode and use enhancement in the valuation basis.
Hope this may solve your issue. There is no standard configuration for including commitments in the WIP calculation.
Thanks
regards
Srinivasan Desingh

Collective Order Actual Activity Pricing

Hi Gurus
We are using collective orders for production orders. As you know collective processes are used for costing shared processes.
Let me explain the problem with an example: Say, we have product A and B to be produced. These two have shared operations and costs will be collected via collective orders by Tcode mill_oc.
The process is as below:
Production order 1 for product A. - Normal production order - CO01
Production order 2 for product B. - Normal production order - CO01
Production order 3 for product A - Collective production order - mill_oc
Confirmations are done for Order 3 during period. At the end of the period Order 3 is settled to Order 1 and Order 2 with certain proportions.
Actual activity price is calculated via Tcode:KSII. During CKMLCP the system valuates activities (posting price differences) for Order 3 product, Product A only. It must be the case that Product A and Product B have to be revaluated.
NOTE: Actual activity price is valuated in material ledger, rather in orders (not with CON2)
Is there any OSS notes or solution for this problem? If there is huge activity price differences, all the value is posted to just one product, which is collective orders product, rather than both lower level orders' products.
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Ahmet

Hi Ahmet,
This is rather a problem of material ledger multi-level settlement than of activity pricing. Material ledger will pick up the actual activity price correctly and will use the difference against the former activvity price as multi-level price difference on the production process. The problem is, if there are multiple outputs coming out of the process, as is resulting of the order combination process, material ledger will by default search for a apportionment structure (for joint production) in the material master of the main (or original) output material. As nothing will be maintained there, all the differences will go to this material.
You can overcome the situation by a BADI implementation of BADI cost_split. There should be an example implementation in your system (if you have the Mill Products add-on active, as is indicated because you use Mill_oc) that enables to distribute the price differences by quantity of the outputs of a process. If you don't find the example implementation I could provide it to you.
best regards,
Udo

Results analysis data is calculated through sales order

Hi All,
I m trying to calculate WIP of one process Order through KKAX. But I am getting the below error
Results analysis data is calculated through sales order 300002423 001000
Message no. KJ112
Diagnosis
The order you selected for WIP calculation or results analysis is assigned to a sales order. A results analysis key was entered for this sales order.
System Response
The system determines results analysis data for orders assigned to sales order items through the results analysis for the sales order.
Procedure
Carry out results analyis on sales order 300002423 001000.
This process Order is related to Sales Order and I have checked the Result Analysis key is attached to Sales Order.
Please help me out in this issue.
Thanks!
Regards,
Vivek

Hi,
I was getting the above error because a RA key was selected ar Sales Order, Now what I have done is I have removed the RA Key from Sales Order, there is already a RA key attached to Process Order. Now When i am calculating KKAX (WIP) I am getting below message
The order is not a WIP element
Message no. KJ148
I have done this because my client is not using KKA3(RA fro Sales Order)
Please help!!!!!!!!!
Thanks!
Regards,
Vivek Srivastava

Error in wip calculation

Dear gurus,
While diong wip calculation system is giving error
+There are values for cost element 50000000 that are not assigned to any line ID**Message no. KJ161+
Diagnosis
Not all values for the cost element are assigned to a line ID.
Procedure
Assign the cost element to a line ID. If you don't want to include the cost element in results analysis, assign it to a line ID of category N.
You can access a detailed list of unassigned cost elements as follows: Start results analysis in the individual processing mode (transaction KKA1, KKA2, or KKA3). Select the field Full log. Execute the function. On the next screen, choose Logs -> Parameter List in the menu. A list is generated. The unassigned values are shown at the end of the list.
+If cost element "++++++++" was shown in the message, this is because in the assignment of costs and revenues to line IDs, you have not used a cost element other than the full masking "++++++++". In this case a presummarization eliminates the information on the cost element.+
What does it mean and what should I do to solve this error
Thanks
Sanket

Hi,
You can find oss notes in the link
https://websmp210.sap-ag.de/
Given below is suggested by oss
Summary
Symptom
When you execute the results analysis or WIP calculation, the system displays the message KJ161 ("There are values for cost element & that are not assigned to any line ID"). In earlier releases, there was only a general information message in this case.
Other terms
KKA1, KKA2, KKA3, KKAI, KKAJ, KKAK, KKAS, KKAV, KKAX, KKAO, work in process.
Reason and Prerequisites
Due to popular customer demand, this general information message was changed into an error message, even if a missing cost element assignment has no effect in some cases.
The cost element specified in the message is intentionally not assigned to any line item ID because the cost element is not to be taken into account.
Solution
For example, you have the following options to eliminate the problem in WIP calculation and results analysis and have the system ignore a cost element:
1. Option
Adjust results analysis Customizing so that the system no longer displays the error message for the cost elements affected.
Create a new line ID.
Assign the cost elements specified in message KJ161 and which you do not want to take into account to this line ID. Consider that the assignment does not depend on the cost element alone.
Add this line ID to the update and assign category 'N'. The system will not take into account the values from line IDs with category 'N' during the results analysis. On the individual processing log, the system displays these values under N(i) and N(p).
2. Option
Adjust the results analysis Customizing so that the system cannot display the error message anymore.
Create a new line ID. It is to function as a remaining collector.
Select category 'N' in Customizing of the assignment if the respective values are to be ignored.
Select category 'D' if the respective values are not to be lost. Then you have the option later, for example, to assign a cost element missing up to now explicitly to another line ID. Then results analysis reposts the affected values in the next run of the remaining collector line ID to the correct line ID.
Assign all remaining cost elements to this line ID. You can do this by adding a wildcard entry in Customizing of the assignment and assign it to the new line ID.
3. Option
Adjust the results analysis Customizing so that the system displays the error message only if there are values not equal to zero.
Create a new line ID. It is to function as a remaining collector.
In the assignment Customizing, select the category 'N'.
Assign all remaining cost elements to this line ID. You can do this by adding a wildcard entry in Customizing of the assignment and assign it to the new line ID.
Use customer enhancement 1 of the results analysis to check whether or not there is a balance for the remaining collector line ID. Customer enhancement 1 is described in SAP note 26002.
Insert the source code from correction instructions number 257651 of this SAP note (302823) into customer Include ZXKAGU01 of customer enhancement 1. The source code uses a line ID - called 'RES' - as the remaining collector line ID in this case; the source code uses a line ID here named 'RES'; it may also have a different name.
The system now only displays message KJ161 if the cumulative balance of the remaining collector line ID is not equal to zero.
4. Option
Using customer enhancement 7, you can influence the message type of message KJ161.
In this case, refer to notes 198983, 455735, and 495279, which describe the customer enhancement and contain the program corrections required for the function outlined here.
Insert the source code from correction instructions number 257470 of this note (302823) into customer Include ZXKAGU07 of customer enhancement 7.
This causes the system to output an information message instead of an error message. If you select the message type J instead of I for the transfer to the user exits, the system suppresses the message completely.
Additional information
Unlike during the individual processing, message KJ161 does not necessarily have to occur during the collective processing of the results analysis because presummarized data may occur during the collective processing under certain conditions. This situation may result in the system already excluding records with the affected cost elements in advance, for example, when there are several records for the same cost element that balance to zero in every period.
If the object to be accrued by mistake was posted to with a cost element which is not assigned to the results analysis in the Customizing, and if this posting was reversed, in spite of the posting reversal the system can generate message KJ161 can be displayed for this cost element during the execution of the results analysis. The reason for this is that the first posting for example, is a debit posting and the reversing posting is a credit posting. This is managed in two table entries in the CO: one entry for the debit posting and another entry for the credit posting. There are results analysis methods which process these entries separately and which do not summarize these entries. For this reason, it is not possible to group these entries before the assignment to a line Id. A case by case summary would require a runtime-intensive analysis for each imported data record which would impair the performance too much. Therefore, also use one of the four options listed above for this purpose.
Regards,
satyajit

Wip Calculation in Collective Order

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for