With holding tax not showing in GL a/c

Hi
I have made the settings for withholding tax. and iam able to deduct the tax also.
while posting the invoice tds amount is credited to TDS payable GL.
When i try to see the amount in TDS payable GL through FS10N iam getting error " no items exist for fiscal year 2008".
But iam sure that my fiscal year is 2008 only.
what will be the wrong?
Regards,
Muniraj

Dear Alok
Thanks for ur promt reply.
But iam not understanding about leading ledger.
can you tell me how / where to check the settngs for the above.
Regards,
Muniraj

Similar Messages

  • With-holding tax not updates

    Hi,
    While doing MIRO the with-holding tax tab is not getting updated. but when I view the accounting document the TDS is getting posted to the correct G/L and the amount is correct.  I have maintained in Vendor master the with-holding tax.
    Please suggest where to configure this.
    Regrds,
    Raziq

    Dear MAURIZIO BIANCOTTI,
    What you meant to say is while doing MIRO, in with-holding tax tab both with-hold type and code will be updated other fields will not be updated.
    for Example...
    1. If invoice amount is 10000 and if I want to tax for only 5000 then i can manually enter the base amount in the field and the system will calculate the percentage from the based amount only is it.
    2. if the invoice amount is 10000 and if i want to tax for the whole amount then the system will only enter the with-hold type and code, the base amount will not be take by the system but when posting the document the system calculates based on the invoice.
    i am right or wrong.. please reply
    regards,
    Raziq.

  • WITH HOLDING TAX ON DOWN PAYMENT

    HI
    I am  using TCode F-47 for down payment request to be paid to vendor. In Vendor Master Record with holding tax information is activated. But at the time of processing payment against down payment request using TCode F-58 With holding tax not deducted and full down payment requested amount getting debited to vendor.
    Pl suggest me
    Message was edited by:
            Chandrakant.K Acharya

    Hi Chandrakanth
    u check once WHT settings at WHT type for Payment posting.here you remove inherit base option. for Cess claculating on TDS.
    you check once define WHT codes for cess. here you calculate  for 1% cess 0.022 % on TDS base amount or invoice amount. ex: inv: 100 , TDS 2.2 %. Cess 1% on 2.2% means 0.0220. like that you calculate.
    Then you update cess tax codes in FK02,here u  select liability option.
    Then you can use f-47. here system showing popup with Base amount,TDS & cess codes.then you save it.
    now you check with f-58. other wise you want temporly solution. go to FB02 change doc. there you can modify WHT amounts then save it.
    ok all the best
    Raj

  • With holding tax tab not showing up in MIRO

    Hi,
    Im trying to do a MIRO for a vendor which requires with holding tax. The setting in done in the vendor master.However while doing MIRO, the with holding tax tab does not show up.
    Does anyone know why with holding tax tab is not showing up in MIRO and what needs to be done.
    PS: It is set up correctly in the vendor master and it works and shows up while doing FI transactions.
    Thanks

    Hello Shruti,
    Kindly check if on the vendor master, on withholding tax tab, checkbox "liable" has been ticked.
    Also kindly check the reconciliation account defined in the vendor master and compared in GL master record, FS00, should have a field status group of G067- Reconciliation Accounts or its equivalent in case you don't use standard SAP field status grouping.
    And also check on the MRIO screen, have you checked "calculate tax" under general tab.
    Hope it will help you
    Thanks
    Para

  • With holding tax base amount is not showing in miro screen

    Dear All
    Whith holding tax amount is not showing in withholding tax tab after all posting also.
    but with holding tax posting is going on fine. in miro screen in withholding tax tab i am not getting this value correctly but it is showing 0 value.
    help me in this regard.
    Regrds,
    Sami

    Dear Sami,
    if the WT datas are zero in MIRO/MIR4 this is due to the Standard System Design. Usually You will have the correct WT data only into the FI follow on document. Only if You insert WT datas manually (wt base amount, wt amount) these will be saved into MIRO/MIR4 as well.
    I hope this helps in understanding the System behaviour.
    Have a nice day.
    Mauri
    Edited by: MAURIZIO BIANCOTTI on Oct 26, 2009 2:22 PM
    Edited by: MAURIZIO BIANCOTTI on Oct 26, 2009 2:22 PM

  • Re: With holding tax is not picking up while excution of RERAPP

    Dear team,
    While executing the RERAPP.With holding tax is not picked.We are working on 4.7 version.We had suggested a badi to pull the with holding tax field.Still system is not showing any caluculation.Plz advice us if any one of you did the immplimenttation in 4.7 and how you resolved this problem .So that it would be help ful for us too.Please do the need ful.
    Regards,
    Suma.

    Dear Sir,
    What we did is all the with holding tax data include the basic amount calculations manually in excel there after  given the input to the system through accounting interface. You can try with your abaper. Plz make sure that GL code length and currency .This has been done through so much work around. Technical person will guide you .If you still facing the problem where exactly your facing then i can help you out.Please be more clear what you did till now then only i can explain you with clarity.
    Regards,
    Suma.

  • With Holding Tax provided in IDOC FIDCC2 is not getting updated in Acc Doc

    Hi All,
    I am Posting a Accounting document in R/3 though Idoc FIDCCP02.
    This idoc has  With holding Tax info segment as E1FIXWT.  i gave all the info in this segment, like Tax code, Tax type , Withholding tax base amount (local currency) , Withholding tax base amount in document currency, Withholding tax amount (in local currencyand Withholding tax amount in document currency
    However, when the Idoc gets posted,and the accounting document gets generated the With holding tab does not get  populated in SAP.
    Please let me know your inputs, that why the woth holding tab is not getting populated with the relevant info from Idoc.
    Thanks in advance

    Hi,
    I have the same issue. But as the idoc is generated in a SAP system of the same release I would have expected that the withholding tax data is already complete. Also are no withholding tax info populated in IT_ACCTX. There only VAT is visible. I suppose IT_ACCWT was meant.
    Anyone any idea?
    Regards
    Stefanie

  • With Holding tax On Down Payment not picking

    Dear All,
    I have configured with holding tax on Payment posting, assigned to vendor,company code it is working fine for invoice positng and vendor payment.
    When I am trying to post down payment f-48 the with holding tax codes selection screen is not pop-up or it calculates with holding tax.
    Why the with holding tax selection tax is not displaying.
    B.S.Rao

    Hi,
    1. Please check withholding tax type is assigned to the company code, IMG: Withholding tax>Extended withholding Tax>Company Code>Assigned Withholding Tax Types to Company Code.
    Note: also check the here the proper dates u201Cw/tax obligated frmu201D and u201COblig.to w/tax untilu201D e.g. 01.01.1900 and 31.12.9999.
    2. Go to OBWW also check the GL is assigned or not.
    3. Also check the field status of recon. account & alternative recon account assigned for special GL for down payment, fields e.g withholding tax code and withholding tax amounts etc. should not be suppressed.
    Thanks
    Javed

  • With holding tax decuction from T.Code F-02 with out sp. gl indicator

    Hi All,
    While making the payt to service vendor my client do not want to use the functionality of advance payt, which can be performed through T.code F-48. They wants to treat this advance payt as a normal payt to vendor but they want to deduct the with holding tax from this payt.
    I have tries to use T.code F-02 with posting keys 25 Dr Vendor & 50 cr Bank. But when i am using this posting key for vendor (i.e.25) System gives me warning message saying with holding tax information is ignored & system do not deduct TDS from the payt made to vendor.
    But when i am using PK 29 with sp gl indicator A for advances from T.Code F-02 system allows me to deduct the with holding tax against vendor paytment.
    Please guide me how to duduct the with holding tax from vendor payt. without using sp. GL indicator for advances.
    Thanks
    Sonal

    Hi
    why ur clien not want advance paymeny through Special GL, what is the issue/purpose
    see TDS deducted at the time of Advance payment and at the time of invoice
    when u use F-02 for TDS deduct of vendor without using special GL and u useing 25 vendor and 50 bank
    in this case tds not deducted here vendoir is debit but withouse advance indicator
    becuase u given vendor advance , but in this case entry not showing advance or
    in SAP Standard system TDS deducted of advance payment when u using 29 posting key for vendor this is stsndard key of advance vendor
    so convience ur clien u use Advance payment method with Special GL, if they not agree then ask what is the purpose u not using Speacial GL through Advance paument
    if any query, revert back
    Regards
    Roobal

  • With holding tax report with material and qty fields

    Dear All,
    Is there any standard report available with with holding tax data with material and qty fields.
    Thanks,
    Sekhar.

    dear Friend,
    Withholding tax will deduct on services. Hence Material and quantity is not relavent.
    There is no report is available also.
    reg
    Madhu M

  • Customer master with holding tax data

    Hi,
    I am working on customer master transaction 'XD01'. I want add new fields to the existing subscreen 'with holding tax' and new fields in the new subscreen. There is  no enhancement is available for this, but there a BADI 'CUSTOMER_ADD_DATA_CS'. But with this we can not update the data to table KNBW(with holding tax data). Can anybody worked on this type of requirements.
    Thanks in Advance
    Rajavardhana Reddy

    Hi Rajavardhana
    Here there two interfaces you can use for transfering data to database and getting data from database.
    SET_DATA     Data Transfer
    GET_DATA     Transfer Data
    Hope this helps you.
    Cheers
    Manohar

  • Calculation of with holding tax

    The requirement goes like this.
    We have to first remove the with holding tax data from the vendor master.
    And created 1 KR(amount : 1000) & 1 RE(amount : 2000) document type.Also we posted both the above invoice documents in one Z1 clearing document.
    Then add the with holding tax information in vendor master.
    Then we executed the report RFWT0020 for that vendor and the document number.Its updating WITH_ITEM table with only the KR total(1000) under WT_QSSHH field.Its not considering RE total.
    I debugged the program RFWT0020 and found a function module FI_WT_GET_P_WITH_ITEM which performs the with holding tax calculation.When i checked the function module,its fetching from global memory.
    Is there any user exit or BADI for this.We are using 4.7 version.
    Please suggest how can i update the correct with holding tax amount in WITH_ITEM table.

    Hi,
    i´ve used this badi for MM (incoming invoices):
    MRM_WT_SPLIT_UPDATE
    Best regards.

  • India -With Holding Tax - Changes As per the Budget Approval

    Dear All
    Many of you are aware, there will not be any surcharge, education & higher education cess for with holding tax in Indai from 01.10.2009.
    Our client is operating seperate tax codes for Basic Duty, Surcharge and Education Cess. We have change the configuration and maintained 0% in the formula for calculating with holding tax for surcharge and education cessand we have maintained with the validity from 01.10.2009
    (ie., The above solution we thought because, we wish to maintain the same tax code and with out modifying the vendor master)
    Now, the system is working fine for all the scenarios, except the transfer of the old advances from special gl indicator to normal line item through T.Code (F-54). Under this T-code, the system is reversing only basic duty at old rates with out surcharge and cess.
    Kindly suggest the solution to reverse the surcharge and cess while doing F-54 with the posting dates as 01.10.2009 onwards
    Regards
    Anilkumar

    Please go through the SAP note 1359268 for budget changes
    also see the 1369775,1371380,1372734 for your exact requirement

  • Regarding With holding tax with CIN version

    Hello SAP gurus
    I've done all the configuration required for the extended withholding tax type-also have updated the tax type and code in the vendor master.
    How to configure automatic surcharge & education cess., With holding tax certificate . What is business place in tds.How to create remittance challan for tds.what is clearing of invoice against down payment.How to create Annual returns of tds.
    While making tds entry with miro, systeam taking dummy profit center.
    So what does configuration required for above error.
    I will assign full points
    Regards
    Divya

    Hi,
    If i am not wrong, the system is reverseing the deduction it has made at the time of adv payment.
    Its not deducting again.
    Consolidate all the three documents -
    - Adv pay
    - Inv
    - Payment
    and you would appreciate the beauty of the concept.
    Cheers
    Raghu

  • With holding tax base amount for 1099 vendors with discounted payment term

    Hi Friends,
    We have a below situation for 1099 vendors,
    Some of the 1099 vendors are set-up in the system with payment term with discounts i.e. 2% if paid within 10 days
    As per config, system posts with holding tax base amount at the time of posting payment.
    With holding tax rate is 0%,
    Based on modified net amount calculation
    and
    Cash discount calculation before w/tax calculation
    When we have vendor with input tax, system excludes tax amount at the time of payment but for the with holding tax base calculation amount system does not exclude input tax type.
    Which causes difference in 1099 – misc vendors
    Below is the example of how system calculates the amount.
    Invoice $ 1000, payment term 2% if paid within 10 days. Input tax 7.25%
    Payment going out=
    $1000- $ 72.5(tax 7.25%) = $ 927.5 – 18.55 [2% discount] = $ 908.95 (payment amount)
    With holding base calculation =
    $ 1000 – 100 (2% discount) = $ 900
    Difference between payment going out and with holding tax base = 908.98 – 900 = 8.98
    Can some one please tell me how to get rid off this difference?
    Moreover, please tell me if it’s normal to have 1099 vendors with discounted payment term.
    Any thoughts on above situation will be helpful
    Edited by: Shefford William on Jan 28, 2008 11:36 PM

    Dear All
    i am also having the same problem. The example is
    Net invoice Value   = $ 100,000
    Input Tax @ 15%   = $  15,000
    Total Invoice Value = $ 115,000
    Cash Discount = 20% with in 20 days
    On payment the system behavior should be
    Debit  Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
    Debit  Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
    Credit  W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,325  ( 3.5% of 95,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $20,000)
    Credit Bank Account  = $ 91,675 ( Inv value - Cash Dic - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3325 = 91,675)
    However at the time of payment system is calculating tax as follows
    Debit  Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
    Debit  Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
    Credit  W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,220  ( 3.5% of 92,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $23,000. This $ 23,000 is only calculated for W/H tax calculation that is 20% of $ 115,000 )
    Credit Bank Account  = $ 91,780 ( Inv value - Cash Dis - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3220 = 91,780)
    this is not the common practice when using the net base value in the system.
    Can any one help me in this regard. I really have been stucked in this problem for many days
    Regards
    Bilal Athar

Maybe you are looking for

  • Bose headset no longer works on iPhone 4

    My Bose headset, which worked flawlessly on 3GS, no longer works for voice control and voice memos on my new iphone 4. They still work fine as headphones but the microphone no longer is operational. The Apple supplied headset works and if I unplug th

  • XML Schema file in data definition

    Hi, I am creating a custom RTF template for a seeded data definition in the eBusiness Suite. The data definition has an XML Schema file loaded however this does not include all the data required for the template. Running the report to just generate t

  • Urgent Querry regarding SRM to R/3 PO Creation

    Hi All, I have one requirement where in PO is created in SRM (using Extended Classic Scenario) and the same PO is reflected in R/3 thru RFC. My requirement is related to pricing i have maintained a condition record for a condition type for eg : ZBRK

  • To Display Image in Alv Grid....

    Hello Gurus, I want to display an image/icon ( custom icon ) in the ALV grid. I know to display standard icons in ALV. But i dont know how to store custom icons in the system. I want to display an icon or image depending upon certain conditions. i ne

  • Problem on a table with hierarchy prompt

    Hi experts, I have an unusual error when I'm using hierarchy prompt. I make an analysis that it has two hierarchycal columns (One of this is to show on rows of my table, another is to get filter when I choose options with hierarchycal dashboard promp