Work Order Issue - Error Creating Goods Delivery,Goods Issue or GRPO

We use SAP Business One 2007 A PL:08. We have an add-on for the work orders and While putting the work order from released to completion, a user is getting an error message that says:
"Error Creating Delivery,Goods Issue or Goods receipt PO- Error Issuing Delivery Note -Item no. is missing [DLN1.Itemcode][Line:3]"
I do not see any item missing in the work order and all the posting periods are open. I have checked all possible settings!!
Any idea what this could be?
Thanks

Hi,
Is it your add-on or a 3rd party add-on?
Thanks,
Gordon

Similar Messages

  • Issue while creating Outbound Delivery using Standard BAPI

    Hi all,
    I am trying to create an outbound delivery for a Sales order using the Standard BAPI - BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CREATE_SLS.
    After giving the valid inputs for Sales order no and doc no, am getting an error as "No instance of object type OutboundDelivery has been created. External reference:" But when trying to create manually there is no problem. Please suggest what may be the issue and how to correct it?
    Regards,
    Vimala P

    Hi Vimala,
    I am trying to create outbound delivery using BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CREATE_SLS & BAPI_DELIVERYPROCESSING_EXEC. But no success. Getting "No instance of object type outbound delivery has been created" in return.
    1) Delivery Type
    2) Delivery selection date
    Needs to be passed in import parameters.
    Could you please tell me what are all the parameters to be passed under tables tab in RV_DELIVERY_CREATE?
    Thanks in Advance..
    Regards,
    Rajasekar .M

  • No creation if material is missing, Still IW31 ( Work order ) is getting created

    Hi Experts,
    I reviewed few discussions and unable to get the correct answer.
    I did the configuration for Material availability check on Order Creation with Path ..
    Plant Maintenance and Customer Service - Maintenance and Service Processing - Functions and Settings for Order Types - Availability Check for Material, PRTs, and Capacities - Define Inspection Control
    In this I assigned my order type with Business Function 1.
    Material Availability :
            Plant                      XX01
           Order Type            XX09
           Availability Check    1    Check availability during order creation
           Checking Rule        01 No Blocked Stocked - All rec/issue elmts
           Component Check Type    Blank
           Collect. conversion  3  No creation if material is missing
    PRT Availability :
              No Check ( Not checked )
               Checking Rule        01 Status check
               Collect. conversion  Blank
    Capacity check
              No Check ( Not checked )
              Overall profile Blank
              Collect. conversion  Blank
    My question is:
    MMBE for that Material ZERO.
    Before Config,
       when I create Order manually IW31 with a components , Status is showing Mat.availability not checked ( MANC ).
    After Config.
       when I create Order manually IW31 with a components , Status is showing     Material committed MACM.
    When Configured for [Collect. conversion  3  No creation if material is missing], still order is getting created.
    I changed to 2 or 1 , still order is getting created with no difference
    But its going to a confirmation proposals asking me to do
    either continue / ATP quantity / Scope of check.
    If I select 1 or 2, it should show Missing Parts status or if select 3, it should stop creation of Order. But its not happening as expected.
    Please let me know where I am missing Config.

    Hello
    Q1 )
    If I change option 1 or 2 :
    1 User decides on creation if material is missing
    Answer:If Material is not Created the system wont allow to add you that material until unless you create the material master created.I am considering here that you don't have material master
    2 Creation even though no material is available
    Answer:It will allow you to create the work order.i am considering here that you don't have sufficient stock.
    Q2) what should be the expected Status for Option 1 or 2.
    Before Config it was showing
    Status is showing Mat.availability not checked ( MANC ).
    After Option 1 or 2, Expected Status ?
    Answer: You need to enter value 02 on the Availability Check field on the MRP3 tab of Material Master via TC MM02.
    you will be  get Material committed MACM after Saving the Order.
    Br
    Rakesh

  • Work Order Header Short Text & Operation Short Text Issue

    Hi All,
    There is one issue while creating the work Order through IW31. When I put the Header Short Text same short text is transpose in to the First Operation short text as per STD SAP behaviour but if I change First Operation short text in creation(IW31) and save and come back in IW32 or IW33 it is showing the same Header Short Text  but not changed one.
    Why it is so???
    I  Want to Edit the First Operation short text in IW31 only not in IW32.
    If anybody have explaination on this please let me know.Its SAP BUG????
    I am Using ECC6.0
    BR
    Rakesh

    Hello Pete,
    No i don't want same short text at Operation short text. Actually when i am in TC IW31 creating Order By default Header Short text is transfer to Operation Short text as per SAP STD functionality when at the same time i change the Operation short text and save and come back and see the Order in IW33 & IW32 i am not able see the changed Operation short text which i changed at  IW31 while creation of order.It showing the same short text of order Header .Why so.......????
    BR
    Rakesh

  • Work Orders are been creating two Operations with no Hours

    Hi Team,
    We have recently changed to configuration settings so that Notification would be created automatically along with the Orders.
    Due to this, whenever we try to change the Old orders (which were created before configuration changes), a new operation line is been updated. This new operation line doesnt has any Hours, only the description of the Work Order is been copied.
    Request your quick thoughts on how we can avoid the second operation line being created.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sindhu

    I would recommend posting whatever sample code you have so far.  You may be making this much more complicated than it really is.
    What are your inputs?  Are they strings with the characters B and 5?  Is it a single string character of ASCII value hexB5?  Is it a numeric integer?  If it is an integer, what is its numeric representation I8, U8, I16, U16 ....?
    If they are integers with a hex display setup, you would be able to directly OR them together.
    Ravi0709 wrote:
    2) I have one more doubt but not related to above question........we can change the display(indicator) according to our requirements......like normal, hex, binary etc.....but how to make use of same changed radix no. in futher ckt........!!!!!!
    What does "ckt" mean?  Remember, the format and precision just determine how the value is displayed.  And the radix is just a visual indicator of the format.  They still have the same value no matter how it is displayed.
    Message Edited by Ravens Fan on 10-16-2007 09:38 AM
    Attachments:
    Example_BD.png ‏2 KB

  • Issue of creating outbound delivery

    2011/01/29     Stock                                                            2,963      2,963                
    2010/12/07     Order     0000136645/000030/0001               30-     2,933                
    2010/12/29     Order     0000128407/000020/0001               1,800-     1,133                
    2011/01/04     Order     0000137517/000090/0001               500-     633                
    2011/01/20     PrdOrd     000004080841/NO  /PD     2011/01/13     10     178      811      5000     B
    2011/01/20     Order     0000128409/000040/0001               3,500-     2,689-               
    2011/01/21     Order     0000137516/000080/0001               500-     3,189-               
    2011/01/26     Order     0000141595/000020/0001               3-     3,192-               
    2011/01/26     Deliv.     0081188756/000020/0000               67-     3,259-               
    2011/01/28     Deliv.     0081193482/000030/0000               1,500-     4,759-               
    2011/01/31     IndReq     VSFB/LTP-5CN1               164-     4,923-               
    2011/02/07     IndReq     VSFB/LTP-5CN1               76-     4,999-               
    2011/02/11     PrdOrd     000004080605/NO     2011/01/13     10     2,000      2,999-     5000     B
    2011/02/14     PrdOrd     000004076573/NO     2011/01/13     10     1,900      1,099-     1000     B
    2011/02/14     PrdOrd     000004079824/NO     2011/01/21     10     1,440      341      5000     B
    Could you help to look at above data?
    When I am trying to do goods issue via vl01n, it says only 396pcs available...

    When I am trying to do outbound delivery of 0000128409/0040...

  • Error: Creating a Connection Pool: issue with valid transaction levels

    Server: SunOS 5.8 Generic_117350-27 sun4u sparc SUNW,UltraAX-MP
    App Server: Sun Java System Application Server 8.2
    Jar: ojdbc14.jar
    Datasource Classname: oracle.jdbc.pool.OracleConnectionPoolDataSource
    Resource Type: javax.sql.ConnectionPoolDataSource
    [Issue]
    Using /SUNWappserver/lib/ojdbc14.jar, when I create my connection pool in Sun Java System Application Server 8.2, I return the following error each time I try to start the domain:
    [#|2006-07-28T14:53:56.169-0500|WARNING|sun-appserver-pe8.2|javax.enterprise.resource.resourceadapter|_ThreadID=11;|RAR5117 : Failed to obtain/create connection. Reason : The isolation level could not be set: READ_COMMITTED and SERIALIZABLE are the only valid transaction levels|#]
    When I change the value to "SERIALIZABLE" in my domain.xml file, I receive the following error in my server.log:
    Caused by: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Attribute "transaction-isolation-level" with value "SERIALIZABLE" must have a value from the list "read-uncommitted read-committed repeatable-read serializable ".
    So, I'm stuck!
    I can't use the values READ_COMMITTED or SERIALIZABLE since the valid values are "read-uncommitted read-committed repeatable-read serializable ".
    Case sensitivity matters.
    Any thoughts or help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    --Todd                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

    The Oracle JDBC accepts TRANSACTION_READ_COMMITTED and TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE isolation levels.
    Example:
    connAttr.setProperty(“TRANSACTION_ISOLATION”, “TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE”);
    I'd check with the Apps server folks.
    Kuassi - blog http://db360.blogspot.com/
    ------ book http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1555583296/

  • PGI Issue while creating outbound delivery.

    Hello All,
    I am facing a strange issue while doing PGI .The system gives the message as shown below ,although we have maintained Posting Periods in both MMPV and OB52. Please help on this issue.
    Posting only possible in periods 2011/07 and 2011/06 in companlly code 1000
    Message no. M7053
    Diagnosis
    The posting date entered is not within one of the permitted posting periods (current period/previous period).
    This can be due to one of two reasons:
    The correct current period has not been set in the system.
    For the system, the first of the entered periods is the current period. At the beginning of a new period, your systems administrator must change the current period in the material master record, using the function "Shift periods". This has not yet been done.
    You have entered a wrong date in the field "Posting date".
    Procedure
    Check the posting date and correct it if necessary. If your input is correct, inform your systems administrator that the "period shifting" (period-end closing) process has not yet been completed. Copied from M8022
    Regards
    Deepak

    Hi Deepak,
    1-Please close all the login of the user logged in.
    2-Goto SU01,put the required user ID and click on for change mode.After this goto "Parameters" Tab.
    3-Add parameter Id="MMPI_READ_NOTE".It will read the SAP Note 487381 and allow you to initialize.
    4-In the parameter value,put the current date and then save
    5-Now goto MMPI and put the date=05.07.2011 or in period you can put 1 and fiscal year=2011 for the respective company code and execute.This will open the July Month of 2011.Hence will allow the posting on 05.07.2011
    6-Now check in MMRV,it will show fro the respective company code,the current period will be 01....2011 and previous Period=12...2010.
    7-Now do all the activities for july 2011 month.
    8-After July close the period through MMPV and it will automatically open for Aug month i.e 06..2011 period
    please try to check based on the above steps
    Revert with your result
    Regards,
    Prasanna

  • Goods return against maintenance work order exceeds goods issue

    Is there a way to prevent returning more quantity (262 movement type done within MB1A) than was issued (261 movement type done within MIGO_GI) against a maintenance work order component?
    Thanks in advance,
    Rick

    Hi,
    Movement Types 261 and 262 works in Planned as well as in Unplanned both ways.
    If you do Goods Issue w.r.t. Maintenance/Work Order (Movement Type - 261) then components and their quantity get defaulted from the reservation created automatically during order creation and system does not allow us to issue more that the quantity in reservation.
    Similarly when you cancel the Goods Issue Document then it hits Movement Type 262 automatically and does not allow to edit the quantity.
    The above two processes are planned ways.
    Now when you want to do extra consumption of components against Maintenance/Work Order then you do not do Goods Issue > Order, instead of this you do Goods Issue > Others and then specify all the necessary details manually (Like; material, quantity, etc...) and enter Maintenance/Work Order as an Account Assignment on which the cost is getting loaded.
    Similarly when you are receiving materials from Maintenance/Work Order using option Goods Receipt > Others then here also there is no control and you can receive any quantity from Maintenance/Work Order since here also Maintenance/Work Order is working as an account assignment not a control document.
    The above two processes are unplanned ways.
    So in short, there is not any control on this movement when it is unplanned.

  • BAPI/FM Help Needed for PM Work Order Update and Notification create

    Hi,
    I am using BAPI - BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN to update the work order details and create notifications for the object list but i am getting errors in doing that.
    IWO_BAPI 203 -Changing the execution factor in the BAPI is not supported
    And i have to create notifications to each object in the object list. This BAPI is not supporting that.
    So i used another BAPI BAPI_ALM_NOTIF_CREATE to create notification and passed the order number , counter etc to it but in the order it is creating a new row for that equipment and linking the notification to it.
    Need some help on these.

    Dear
    1. If you want a Notification mandatory to be created for Order using IW31 you can once make this happen by User Status in Order ,   i would suggest if you are doing implementation better Use Order Types  which has got Notification integrated in it .
    Check Order type PM05 in Ideas server you have PM05 Order with notification fields integrated , which created notification in Background when order is Created or released.
    2.For Work Order B --> Notification A , Not Allowing I donot have any idea check whether is there any User exit from experts or ask ur Abaper
    Regards,
    Edited by: Srinivas Narayana Gowda on Jun 11, 2009 1:10 PM

  • Preventive Work Order Dates Synchronization with its automatic created  notification

    Dear all,
    Preventive Work Order Dates Synchronization with its automatic created  notification
    My question was initiated from PM module forum, please check above URL if you have time.
    My ultimate problem is that :
         "SMOD" Enhancement  "QQMA0018" needs to receive its origin data of work order when the execution time of IP10 or IP30.
         so that I can decide/calculate desired dates on the notification according to its origin work order date .
    Do I need to use "export/import memory" statements to communicate with origin work order?
    if it's true
    Thanks for your help in advance.

    Dear Pete,
    I just made test data in our DEV server,
    Work orders has been created by "IP30" which was executed today with its maint. plan( date format DD.MM.YYYY ).
    below work order has been created and the basic start date seems derived from plan date.
    below image is showing our 'SPRO' configuration for the PM priority.
    "ZM03" order type is using "ZP" priority type.
    (I don't know why is this work order didn't take the values defined on 'priorities for Each Priority Type' for calculating "basic start" & "basic finish" date, it seemed just copied same date with PlanDate)
    you can see the notification which is created automatically by work order as below.
    "M4" notification type is using "ZP" priority type as well.
    It took the 'required start' date by adding 2 weeks from today(=creation date) as 'priorities for Each Priority Type' has defined and 'required end' date also set to 6 months later from 'required start' date.
    (Am I right?)
    Please let me know, if you need further information.
    Thank you for your help.

  • How to create Work Order in CMRO

    Dear All,
    We are new to using Oracle CMRO and because of unavailability of CMRO resources, we are facing quite a few problems while working on CMRO. Can anyone please help me out how can I create Work Order using CMRO.
    If anyone can provide me with Oracle CMRO White Papers, I will be very thankful.
    Regards,
    Zulfiqar Ali Mughal

    Hi,
    There are 3 ways to create work order in oracle cMRO.
    1) Through Maintenance Requirement and associated to visit and push to production.
    2) Non-routine.
    3) Unassociated Task.
    1.     Create Work Order From Maintenance Requirement:- In order create work order first of all we need to define an MR in Engineering > Fleet Maintenance Program > Overview > Create. After creating the MR Header at least one route should be associated (Route can be created from Engineering > Route >Overview > Create and the status should be "complete"). Then MR effectivity (means which item or unit MR is applicable) need to be defined and in turn the interval threshold also need to define. Once the MR is completed from the Planning window associate the MR to a visit and push to Production. In case of Planned MRs run the Build Unit Effectivities and view the due date from the Planning> Unit Maintenance Plan screen and associate to a Visit in Planning and push the visit to production. In case of Unplanned MRs create visit, associate unplanned MR, push to production.Work Orders would have generated and visible in Execution >Production Planning > Work Orders.
    2.     Create Non-Routine:- Non- Routines can be created from Execution and Planning
    a.Create Non-Routine work order from Execution:- Select the Routine work order and select Create Non-Routine work order from the pull down menu, furnish the details like severity, urgency, summary etc. and click on (B) Apply.
    b.Non-Routine from Planning: Create NR from Planning >Unit Maintenance Plan> Non-Routines (B)Create and then associate to a visit and push to production.
    3.     Unassociated Task:-This is for executing the miscellaneous operations to be done as part of already created visit. Navigate the visit task screen in an already created visit (Navigation: Planning > Visit Work Package > Overview > Search the visit > Click on the visit hyperlink> view visit task in side Menu), From the drop down menu select the “ Create Unassociated Task” and click (B) Go. Furnish the details in the Task header and click on (B) Apply and (B) Cancel, you would be navigate back to the “Visit Task” Screen. Select the unassociated task and push to production. Unassociated work orders would have created. You can create Unassociated task any time during the execution, before closing of visit.

  • Steps to create Work Order

    Hi,
    Could you tell about What is work order creations & steps to create.
    Not sure if below steps are right.
    work order process -->to create work oder---> work request ----> bom ----> routing -->
    Thanks

    Hi,
    you can visit the following links.
    http://oracleappscommunity.com/oracle/blog/365/discrete-job-creation/
    http://oracleappscommunity.com/oracle/blog/38/oracle-work-in-process-overview/
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k6XjVjoLgmo
    http://egeapp.egeseramik.com:8000/pls/prod/fndgfm/fnd_help.get/US/eam/@SelfService1010562
    HTH
    Sanjay

  • Bulk Items in Work Orders-How to Avoid Issuing

    Prior to Complete - No Charge process, we review work orders for any material that was not issued. Frequently BULK items (screws etc) are not issued for productivity reasons
    Is their a way to prevent these items from showing up on the work orders in the first place?

    Hi
    Bulk component is used when you want to communicate to the shop floor that this component must be used but need not be transacted.
    This component is not backflushed. In the same way, it is not issued when you issue all components for an assembly. However, you cam manually issue specific components to a discrete job.
    Regards,
    Ricardo Cabral

  • Tracking the component changes - Open work order

    Hi
    We have been using special work order type, it is an open work orders. Was created for adding the small consumable and do the time writing for small jobs. The users are instructed to use only for consumable material and time writing job. But how ever the user who have acces to change the workorder are adding those material with high value. I want to trach who has ordered this changes is there any standard way to check the order.
    If any changes made to the component list it will display the same reservation number which the warehouse will issue the goods, I would like to know each time item added to the component list by different user there ID or the name i should find.
    Thanks
    Mujeeb

    Hi Peter,
    Yes we can see the material reserverd against the person who is taking the material from the warehouse.
    But the issue is while adding the material in the work order does not show who is the person adding the material to the workorder, it will go to the person who created the workorder to the same reservation.
    For my issue is there any standard way or we have to go for development please let me know.
    Thanks,
    Mujeeb

Maybe you are looking for

  • Vendor Invoice Payment (Urgent please)

    Hi Need to know I have done Down payment to Vendor F-47 of Rs 3000 then did F110 and paid the vendor throguh Check. Now I created a PO of Rs 8500 and did GR and so while doing Invoice of it showed me 3000- down payment exists. Show how can  I did the

  • How can I merge my files in the correct page order?

    Hello - I'm trying to combine several files... but I want to arrange the order of the pages. Does anyone know how to do this? Thanks!

  • Modem DSL Light flashes

    Hello I posted a few days ago about my PPPOE connection dropping on my Apple router around once or twice per day. I have since noticed that when this happens, the DSL light on the white modem also goes out and flashes. In fact, it happened last night

  • Integration scenarios ending in errors in HCI since the upgrade.

    Hi all,    We were having C4C-ERP integration scenarios working via HCI. Please note that with the 1405 upgrade, all our HCI scenarios stopped running. Whenever we are triggering an outbound from C4C, getting the below message: Error in HCI : Inbound

  • My iphone 4 repeats the same song.

    My iphone 4 repeats the same song over and over again. No matter how I seleceted (either playlist or album or artist...) Also there is no scrollbar (timeline) and no button for repeat and shuffle as there used to be in the music player. Whats wrong -