Wrong color of an image!

I have scaned an image, modified it in Photoshop (made white bgcolor) and imported it in SAP.
In SAP I see gray bgcolor of my picture (not white).
What should I do?

Hi,
I had the same problem. I resolved it by using pictures under this : 256 colors BMP file. It's a problem of conversion when you upload your pictures in SAP.
Olivier

Similar Messages

Images Shown In Wrong Colors

Hello,
I have a problem in Lightroom.
I just Lightroom 3 a try, only it turns out the colors of the images aren't displayed correctly.
It gives this darker and sort off green-heavy version of the originals.
It's kind of funny cause they look like film-photos developed badly or something.
Anyway, some time ago I tried an earlier version of Lightroom and I think at first the colors were fine,
later it turned into what I just described because I believe I touched something.
So does anyone know how I can get the colors to be displayed correctly?
Please note, I did a fresh install of Lightroom and removed anything Lightroom-related before.
And all colors outside Lightroom or even the look of the panels of Lightroom and such are correct.
So all image-viewers, all videos, all other media... they all look right.
Even in Photoshop, where I had a similar issue too but it was some colorspace-setting or something.
But apparently Lightroom doesn't have that?
Oh, AND I found that when I'm at the import-interface, the thumbnails of the images are shown correctly.
Then when I select the ones I want and actually import them to use they're not the same anymore.
If anyone has a clue, or the solution of course, that would be great.
Cause this is really unfortunate, I was looking forward to using this,
especially now I have a camera that supports RAW, I wanted to develop them in Lightroom.
(Oh yeah, the images I tried were simply JPEG-photos by the way.)
Greetings...

OK, I understand it quite a bit better now, thanks for all your posts.
But I did have an issue with Photoshop (CS3 as in the screenshot) a couple of months ago.
I'm not sure what it looked like, but it was also this issue with wrong colors.
Then I messed around with those "Proof"-settings and set it to the "monitor"-one.
I guess that's the same as using no color-profiles? As they (Ps & Lr) look identical now I mean...
I'm not sure what it was set to before by the way, I think it was set to a certain profile too.
Then I kinda steered away from choosing a profile and selected that "monitor"-option I guess.
Sorry, can't remember exactly, but you probably know what I mean.
At least I can go ahead a bit with Lightroom now.
As long as I keep the original shots I guess there can't go much wrong.
Also, if I print something, would it be a good idea to match the look of the monitor closer to the print?
At least, if it's off way too much. Or should I check if a specific printer uses no or a correct profile too somewhere?
I do have a nice standalone which is set to sRGB too I believe.
It is funny that I get the prints almost exactly to what they look like on the monitor or camera.
Anyway, I háve been playing around with something called RivaTuner,
which can tweak and load color-profiles on startup, I guess it's similar to what calibration-software would be like?
But I think I turned the loading of those settings off a while ago too though.
Cause it was always "a tad too red, a tad too blue, a tad too green" or whatever for my eyes,
so I thought I'd stop messing with it and leave it neutral which would probably be better anyway...

Photoshop CS 6 - image -canvas - make double matt - select color - if I select wrong color, how do I change to a new color, right now it won't change to the new color I select, WHY?????

Photoshop CS 6 - image -canvas - make double matte - select color - if I select wrong color, how do I change to a new color, right now it won't change to the new color I select, WHY?????

Hi, The options bar shows sample size 101 by 101 Average. That was my problem. When I was troubleshooting in order to try to explain to you what was happening, I noticed that when I sampled my models teeth, it gave me a color a bit lighter than her lipstick as my foreground color in my tool box. That started me thinking in the correct way. I didn't realize that my sample size had somehow gotten switched from point sample to 101 by 101 average. I appreciate the help. Thank you.

G4050 color of scanned images is wrong

Hello,
I am using the Scanjet G4050. The color of the images I scan in are terribly off. I'm not talking about negatives or slides... I haven't begun to tackle those issues yet. The cartoon images I draw and scan in are way wrong. Is there a patch or recalibration? Thank you

This can be caused by a problem with the color profile for your display monitor or color profiles embedded in images.
You can disable color management to test if the problem is the color profile on the computer. 
You can set the pref gfx.color_management.mode to 0 on the about:config page to disable Color Management. 
You need to close and restart Firefox to make the change effective. 
See:
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/gfx.color_management.mode
See:
* https://developer.mozilla.org/En/ICC_color_correction_in_Firefox
Caveats: The new QCMS color management system introduced in Firefox 3.5 currently only supports ICC version 2 color profiles, not version 4.
To open the about:config page, type about:config in the location (address) bar and press the "Enter" key, just like you type the url of a website to open a website. 
If you see a warning then you can confirm that you want to access that page. 
*Use the Filter bar at to top of the about:config page to locate a preference more easily.
*Preferences that have been modified show as bold(user set).
*Preferences can be reset to the default or changed via the right-click context menu.

DW CS5 displays image wrong color

I have an image created in Photoshop CS5 which I am using as a header image in DW CS5. I have made sure the hex code for the clolor matches in both programs but DW shows the wrong color but when I view the page in Firefox or Safari the color displays correctly. I really can't understand why DW does not display the correct color since the color codes are the same as what is shown in Photoshop and displays correctly in Photoshop.
Any help is appreciated.

I guess its OK to reply to my own question! The problem is the jpg file. There is no problem when the image is saved as png file. All the browsers and DW display the color correctly now. I still would appreciate any comments that might shed some light on the differences between jpg and png that might cause something like this.
Thanks

Images in PDFs are too dark - wrong color, brightness, contrast

I use my IPAD mainly for viewing medical books, e.g. radiological atlases. Most come in PDF format and most don't look much different on the IPAD than they do on PC. But it is very frustrating to find that the most important book I need looks incredibly bad on the IPAD - it's color reproduction of images is very poor compared to the PC. I've tried all possible viewers, the problem must be in the PDF rendering engine of the IPAD.
Is this problem already known and is there a solution?
Thank you for your help.

Hi, did anybody read my fix to the problem from 19.09.2011?
Here is another one I found on ipadforums.net:
Fix to PDF Image problem
Little after the fact, but in case any one googles to this like I did, I did find a work around for this. Only on a mac... I am running Lion and I simple Save as in Preview didn't do the trick for me.
Two options, One a little easier then the other. 1. Open the file in preview. Chose File-> Export. Set the obvious and then under quartz filter select reduce file size. Then hit save. Put the file on your iPad and you should be good to go. This will also circumvent and "large" file size issues you may get from other ways to "fix" this. 2. If you need to have the images in even higher quality, as the first option may decrease the quality slightly then there are more steps.
Select the file you need and choose open with-> ColorSync Utility. Top left of the screen is the button to open filter inspector (three circles, one green, blue and red). Click the downward triangle next to Reduce file size and select duplicate. Rename the copy to anything and then Press the downward triangle on this file. Select Add domains. Then Expand the field (triangle on the left of the name). Expand Image Expansion. Change the quality bar to max. Expand Domains and check PDF workflows. Close the filters box.
On the bottom of the original screen that was opened there is a filter option. Select the file you just created and click apply. Then save the file and you are good to go with a higher quality. This will fix any color issues with pdf images on iPads. I had pdf images that the colors were off on, almost negative and this worked like a charm. Once its set up its very easy and quick for future pdf image problems.

Flash Player (Web Export) showing wrong colors

Cheers!
Sometimes when I look at my exported galeries I'm not satisfied regarding the colors. Up to today I thought that this is based on my week skills in developing photos.
But that seems to be wrong! Please helpt me with the following:
I'm exporting via Web Module using a simple viewer template (which uses the adobe flash player to display images). Now I fire up that little web page in my browser (safari or firefox in my case) and compare what I see with what I see in lightroom (library module). I can notice a very severe difference in the color presentation. Next I start a second browser window and place it beside the one showing the flash player galery exported before. Within that browser window I call the image from the image folder within the exported web page and compare both. Hence! It does not look like the same.
To illustrate that I shot the following a couple of minutes ago:
http://minolta.karlos.at/test.png
On the left you see the lightroom web galery (simple viewer) and on the right the jpeg picture itself. (You can try that by starting the web galery and then click on the photo and launch it with the command "open picture in new window"
Weird!
Is that behaviour known and is there any solution to avoid this wrong color display?
Thanks!
C.

Flash is not color managed (although in the latest version you can somehow turn it on I understand) so it will never show the right color ever. That said, if you have a good display but not so good it has a wide gamut, and you calibrate correctly at gamma 2.2, you should see very similar color. The problem on Macs that have not been calibrated is that the default gamma is wrong (even Apple says this) and they have to be calibrated to be right. Normally Safari color manages so the gamma of most images gets automaticaly corrected, but it cannot color manage flash.
That said, from your screenshot it appears the difference is entirely due to the difference in gamut between your display and sRGB. There is nothing you can do about it but pester Adobe to enable color management for the latest flash versions in the Lightroom flash galleries. Of course nobody that looks at your gallery will actually see the right color anyway as basically nobody calibrates their screen and most people do not even use color managed browsers.

Pages have wrong color when published

Hello, I have been trying to publish a site with iWeb, and everything is going fairly well except for the following problem: Some of the pictures publish with the wrong colors (greens show up as pink, among other things). The rest of the pictures publish normally. They are all jpgs, all of which I moved into iWeb from the media browser.
Anybody know what's up? Anybody having color issues upon publish? I am working from a macbook on this project.
dual 2.0 G5 and G4 P'book Mac OS X (10.4.8)

I think what is happening is that your JPGs are being converted to PNG by iWeb. And the particular images that are having color shifts do not have the right color information and that's why it shifts when converted to PNG by iWeb.
Try this... you need to make your JPGs the exact size that you will be using them at in iWeb, or at least capture a PNG that has the correct color info. The easiest way to do this is to have iWeb open to that page and then take a screenshot of the image in iWeb. Use Apple-Shift-4 to draw a rectangle around the image. Then bring this image back into iWeb. Then publish. You should see an improvement in color.

Wrong colors on iDVD burned disk after FCut Pro installation

Hi there:
For some reason, after burning a DVD using the iDVD 5.0.1 software all I get is wrong colors when playing it in ANY DVD player. If I watch the very same disk on my G5 Mac, everything turns out ok!
Is it a codec problem?? This problems sudenly began AFTER I installed the Final Cut Pro on my disk.
How can this be explained by the Final Cut installation? And how can I get it right again?
Any help on this would be highly apreciated, please!
Thanks in advance!
Rui.

The images are pictured ok, but the colors are wrong. I have two DVD players at home:
- When I play the DVD on an expensive Pionner DVD player, the reds turned into some sort of green, and the overall color range seems more «cold» (ie, more blue and greenish)
- When I play the DVD on a cheap 20 dolars players, everything turns out black and white.
It happens this way no matter if I use the NTSC or PAL preferences when burning.
I also tryed to asve a .img to disk and burn it using the Disk Utility. Didnt work also.
Ok, I'll try what you say about the external monitor
Thanks for being around.
Rui.

DNG files rendered with wrong color profile?

Does someone else also have a problem with DNG (digital negative) files showing incorrect colors when opened in Apple software (Preview, iPhoto, Aperture..)?
I have a Nikon D750 and currently consider using DNG as archive format for my RAW files.
But the converted DNG files are shown with a wrong color profile when opened via Apple's own camera raw framework...
It works in Adobe software - such as Lightroom - but any software using the OS X internal camera raw framework seems to use the wrong color profile when opening the DNG. Note that the original D750 NEF files are opened and rendered correctly.
I am using OS X Yosemite 10.10.2 with the latest Camera Raw Compatibility Update 6.02 installed.
On the Adobe side, it is Lightroom 5.7 and DNG Converter 8.7.1.
I tried all kinds of different conversion settings. It does not seem to make a difference whether I embed preview images in the DNG or not, whether I shoot in 12 or 14bit RAW, and whether I include the original RAW file into the DNG or not. I also tried to explicitly select the 'Camera Standard' color profile in Lightroom first and then export the DNG, but still on the OS X side the resulting image looks wrong as compared to the original NEF.
Any other Nikon user here who could verify my problems?

A few simple tests on your end may help you better understand:
1. Capture the same image (same camera settings in RAW and JPEG)
2. Open these images in Canon DPP - they will be a close match, this is because Canon DPP and the Canon camera itself use similar RAW processing algorithms
3. Open convert the CR2 to DNG, and open the CR2, DNG, and JPEG in Adobe Camera RAW - the CR2 and DNG should be a very close (if not identical) match if you use the same processing settings for each, since they are both being processed by ACR's algorithms; the JPEG will probably not match as it was processed with Canon's algorithms
What you are seeing is at the HEART of raw processing, and has nothing to do with color spaces or with DNG being at fault. The very nature of RAW processing means every processor (DPP, ACR, CaptureOne, etc) will produce different results by default - that's not to say that with some adjustments you can't match one processor's results to another, but it won't be the case by default.
The choice of RAW processor has FAR more an impact on your results than color space - in fact color space should have virtually no visual impact, though depending on the scene photographed you might have better gradations in some color spaces, better handling of highly saturated colors in some, but the overall look should remain close regardless of color space choice.
Further, as has been pointed out by others, raw files (which includes CR2 and DNG) do not have a color space - raw files are by definition raw image data which has yet to be processed into a color space. When you see color space assignments in RAW processors, that is relevant to the files you create FROM the raw files, not relevant to the raws themselves.
Before bringing inflammatory language and false assumptions to a forum with a high level of expert membership you might want to research the issue, and devise some simple tests (like above) to help you understand the issue first.

ImageIO: scaling and then saving to JPEG yields wrong colors

Hi,
when saving a scaled image to JPEG the colors are wrong (not just inverted) when viewing the file in an external viewer (e.g. Windows Image Viewer or The GIMP). Here's the example code:
public class Main {
 public static void main(String[] args) {
 if (args.length < 2) {
 System.out.println("Usage: app [input] [output]");
 return;
 try {
 BufferedImage image = ImageIO.read (new File(args[0]));
 AffineTransform xform = new AffineTransform();
 xform.scale(0.5, 0.5);
 AffineTransformOp op = new AffineTransformOp (xform, AffineTransformOp.TYPE_BILINEAR);
 BufferedImage out = op.filter(image,null);
 ImageIO.write(out, "jpg", new File(args[1]));
/* The following ImageViewer is a JComponent displaying
the buffered image - commented out for simplicity */
 ImageViewer imageViewer = new ImageViewer();
 imageViewer.setImage (ImageIO.read (new File(args[1])));
 imageViewer.setVisible (true);
 catch (Exception ex) {
 ex.printStackTrace();
Observations:
* viewing this JPEG in an external viewer displays the colors wrong, blue becomes reddish, skin color becomes brown, blue becomes greenish etc.
* when I skip the transformation and simply write the input 'image' instead the colors look perfect in an external viewer!
BufferedImage image = ImageIO.read (new File(args[0]));
ImageIO.write (image, "jpg", new File(args[1]));
* when I do the scale transformation but store as PNG instead the image looks perfect in external viewers!
BufferedImage out = op.filter(image,null);
ImageIO.write(out, "png", new File(args[1]));
* viewing the scaled JPEG image with The GIMP produces "more intense" (but still wrong) colors than when viewing with the Windows Image Viewer - I suspect that the JPEG doesn't produce plain RGB values when decompressed (another color space used then sRGB? double instead of int values?)
* Loading the saved image and display it in a JComponent shows the image fine:
class ViewComponent extends JComponent
 private Image image;
 protected void paintComponent( Graphics g )
 if ( image != null )
// image looks okay!
 g.drawImage( image, 0, 0, this );
 public void setImage( BufferedImage newImage )
 image = newImage;
 if ( image != null )
 repaint();
* Note that I've tried several input image formats (PNG, JPEG) and made sure that they were stored as RGB (not CMYK or the like).
* Someone else already mentioned that the RGB values as read from an JPG image are wrong, but no answer in this thread - might be connected with this problem: http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?forumID=20&threadID=612542
* I tried the jdk1.5.0_01 and jdk1.5.0_04 on Windows XP.
Any suggestions? Is this a bug in the ImageIO jpeg plugin? What am I doing wrong? Better try something like JAI or JIMI? I'd rather not...
Thanks a lot! Oliver
p.s. also posted to comp.lang.java.programmers today...

Try using TYPE_NEAREST_NEIGHBOR
rather than
TYPE_BILINEARI was a bit quick with saying that this doesn't work - I had extended my example code which made it fail (see later), but here's a working version first (note: I use the identity transform only for simplicity and to show that it really doesn't matter whether I scale, rotate or shear)):
// works, but only for TYPE_NEAREST_NEIGHBOR interpolation
Image image = ImageIO.read (new File(args[0]));
AffineTransform xform = new AffineTransform();
AffineTransformOp op = new AffineTransformOp (xform, AffineTransformOp.TYPE_NEAREST_NEIGHBOR);
BufferedImage out = op.filter(image, null);
ImageIO.write(out, "jpg", new File(args[1]));The problem: we restrict ourselves to nearest neighbor interpolation, which is especially visible when scaling up (or rotate, shear).
Now when I change the following, it doesn't work anymore, the stored image has type=0 instead of 5 then (which obviously doens't work with external viewers):
// doesn't work, since an extra alpha value is introduced, even
// for TYPE_NEAREST_NEIGHBOR
BufferedImage out = op.filter(image, op.createCompatibleDestImage(image, ColorModel.getRGBdefault()));Intuitively I would say that's exactly what I want, and RGB image with data type int (according to JavaDocs). That it has an alpha channel is a plus - or is it?
I think this extra alpha value is the root of all evil: JPEG doesn't support alpha, but I guess ImageIO still mixes this alpha value somehow into the JPEG data stream - for ImageIO that's not a problem, the JPEG data is decompressed correctly (even though the alpha values have become meaningless then, haven't checked that), but other JPEG viewers can't manage this ARGB format.
This also explains why writing to PNG worked, since PNG supports alpha channels.
And obviously an AffineTransformOp silently changes the image format from RGB to ARGB, but only for TYPE_BILINEAR and TYPE_CUBIC, not for TYPE_NEAREST_NEIGHBOR! Even though I can imagine why this is done like this (it's more efficient to calculate with 32 bit ints than with 24 bit packed values, hence the extra alpha byte...) I would at least expect the JPEG writer to ignore this extra alpha value - at least with the default settings and unless otherwise told with extra parameters! Now my code gets unnecessary complicated.
So how do I scale an image using bilinear (or even bicubic) interpolation, so that it get's displayed properly with external viewers? I found the following code working:
// works, but I need an extra buffer and draw operation - UGLY
// and UNNECESSARILY COMPLICATED (in my view)
BufferedImage image = ImageIO.read (new File(args[0]));
AffineTransform xform = new AffineTransform();
AffineTransformOp op = new AffineTransformOp (xform, AffineTransformOp.TYPE_BILINEAR);
BufferedImage out = op.filter(image, null);
// create yet another buffer with the proper RGB pixel structure
// (no alpha), draw transformed image 'out' into this buffer 'out2'
BufferedImage out2 = new BufferedImage (out.getWidth(), out.getHeight(),
 BufferedImage.TYPE_INT_RGB);
Graphics2D g = out2.createGraphics();
g.drawRenderedImage(out, null);
ImageIO.write(out2, "jpg", args[1]);This is already way more complicated than the initial code - left alone that I need to create an extra image buffer, just to get rid of the alpha channel and do an extra drawing.
I've also tried to supply a BufferedImage as 2nd argument to the filter op to avoid the above:
ICC_ColorSpace (iccColorSpace = new ICC_ColorSpace (ICC_Profile.getInstance(ColorSpace.CS_sRGB)
BufferedImage out = op.filter(image, op.createCompatibleDestImage(image, new DirectColorModel (iccColorSpace), 24, 0xff0000, 0x00ff00, 0x0000ff, 0x000000, false, DataBuffer.TYPE_INT))); But then the filter operation failed ("Unable to transform src image") and I was beaten by the sheer possibilities of color spaces, ICC profiles, so I quickly gave up... and hey, I "just" want to load, scale and save to JPG!
The last option was getting a JPEG writer and its ImageWriteParam, trying to set the output image type:
iwparam.setDestinationType(ImageTypeSpecifier.createFromBufferedImageType(BufferedImage.TYPE_INT_RGB));But again I failed, the resulting image type was still type=0 (and not 5). So I gave up, realising that the Java API is still overly complex and "too design-patterned" for simple tasks :(
If anyone has still a good idea how to get rid of the alpha channel when writing to JPEG in a simple way (apart from creating an extra buffer as above, which works for me now...)... you're very welcome to enlighten me ;)
Cheers, Oliver
p.s. Jim, I will assign you the "DukeDollars", since your hint was somewhat correct :)

How do I change the color of an image while still keeping some detail within the image

I am trying to take a handprint such as the one below and change the color of the handprint to say a light pink (or any color) but I want to keep most of the detail of the fine lines that make this handprint unique. The lines could even just come out as white as below. The main thing is to change the overall color while maintaining the fine details. I have been trying to accomplish this for over a week now in Photoshop Elements 11 and I have been unsuccessful as anything I do just totally color fills the image, which does not keep any details of the handprint. Thank you to anyone who may be able to help me.

Hello again,
Unfortunately, I am not getting the same result as you and I was wondering if you would take a look at what I'm doing and maybe you could tell me what I'm doing wrong.
I go to file, open and bring in my file
Go to Select, Layer, New, Layer
Name = Layer 1
Mode = color
ok
Two things then seem to go wrong:
1. I chose my foreground color, but when I go to paint, a smart brush setting takes over so I had to change my paint color in that setting - to pink. also my foreground box color will then change to gray
2. So then I do have a pink handprint, but when I change the opacity, it only effects the pink - and not the black on the handprint (pic below). I want the black to go away and have only the color there with the unique lines of the handprint which you were able to do.
I'm not that handy in layering so maybe i'm doing something wrong there - just not real sure.
Can you help? I liked the way your handprint came out - if I could copy that with any color that would be great and exactly what I'm looking to do.
Thank you so much.
Tami

Psa se 3.2 prints wrong color

Album will not print photo correctly it is not the printer. Even the print preview shows the print image as the wrong color (it adds a green tint). Any suggestions

I recently downloaded photoshop 3.2, upgrading from adobe photoshop. I'm very impressed with the auto fix window, and how bright and clear the pictures are, but I, too, am having the same trouble as Ann. When I tried to print off a photo, it came out with a blue tint, so I went back to photo, and reversed auto fix window to original photo. But when I tried to print it again, the photo appeared to be just washed out, with blue tones throughout photo. What can be done to get good color photos?? Thanks

Wrong color profile after export - what am I doing wrong?

I'm a beginner in color management and color profiles and I have a problem with my exported files from AE CS6 (german version):
In my project settings I've set the working space to "adobe RGB (1998)" which is the same like my footage (JPEG Image-Sequence).
In my Output Module Settings I've set it also to the working space "adobe RGB (1998)".
I' ve tried to export it as h.246 and AVI.
And now the Problem: the exported clips are too bright and washed out. First I thought it is a problem with the Windows Media Player, but I imported the clips again to after effects and the showed Profile is now "HDTV (Rec. 709) Y'CbCr". This is the case with the h.246-clips. The AVI-Clips showed the profile "sRGB IEC61..." So the settings from the Output Module didn't seem to work.
The washed-out-effect disappeared after I set everything to HDTV, but I don't think this is the right way to go..
Thank you for any help

Simple, really: You are using a) a wrong color space b) your system is not calibrated, but you have color management enabled and c) use formats that don't support color management. This is simply wrong from stem to stern, especially with regards to b) and c). Why would you even use Adobe RGB when video works on Rec 709 or even more generic sRGB? I think you do not even understand the point of CM on a fundamental level. you don't dictate the color space by your source files, you simply import them into your working color space - regardless of whatever it is set to. The color metrics engine will apply any corrections necessary based on the associated/ embedded profiles, which ultimately is the whole point. Conversely, enabling CM for output will require a format that actually uses those corrections, which comes down to only a handful. so to cut a long story short: Unless you are willing and technically able to establish a proper CM workflow simply leave it off and just use the default sRGB that AE ever has used.
Mylenium

The color of certain images is displayed incorrectly

Many png images are displaying the wrong color. For example one page the png's are green when they should be blue. On the page linked below the laptop and person are bright pink. When I save pngs and open them using other software (or use another browser) the colors are correct.
I am using Firefox 6 on Ubuntu 11.04 on a MacPro

This can be caused by a problem with the color profile for your display monitor or color profiles embedded in images.
You can disable color management to test if the problem is the color profile on the computer. 
You can set the pref gfx.color_management.mode to 0 on the about:config page to disable Color Management. 
You need to close and restart Firefox to make the change effective. 
See:
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/gfx.color_management.mode
See:
* https://developer.mozilla.org/En/ICC_color_correction_in_Firefox
Caveats: The new QCMS color management system introduced in Firefox 3.5 currently only supports ICC version 2 color profiles, not version 4.
To open the about:config page, type about:config in the location (address) bar and press the "Enter" key, just like you type the url of a website to open a website. 
If you see a warning then you can confirm that you want to access that page. 
*Use the Filter bar at to top of the about:config page to locate a preference more easily.
*Preferences that have been modified show as bold(user set).
*Preferences can be reset to the default or changed via the right-click context menu.

Wrong color of an image!

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for