Wrong GROUP_ACCOUNT_NUM values

Hello everybody:
I´d already defined the values for the group account number in the file_group_acct_codes_ora.csv and the values are getting right to the OBIEE Analytic Warehouse table W_GL_ACCOUNT_D.
in the Cash flow dashboard located in Financials > General Ledger > Overview its taking the default values form the Group_account_num and not from the table W_GL_ACCOUNT_D
Does anyone know where the report might be taking its values?

Thanks for your reply.
The Client says they just have those five Group Account numbers, I gave the Out of the Box Group Account Num , Can you clarify the following :
1. Does the Group Account File should be similar to the EBS Group Account file i.e with all the the Group Account number with From and To and with Group Account Name.
2. I loaded the Data with the five Group Account nums(ASSET,LIABLITY,EQUITY,REVENUE) what has been given and i see balance sheet and P & L accounts without any data.
3. The OOB defines ASSET as OTHER ASSET AND LIABILITY as OTHER LIAB, when i extracted the query and modified the query yielded results.
Again my question is shall i ask the client to provide us with group account numbers of their Sub ledger i.e CASH, DEPRECIATION,PPE etc..
Thanks

Similar Messages

SXPG_COMMAND_EXECUTE return wrong parameter value

Dear all.
We have an Abap program that pulls an encrypted FTP file and saves it to our network.
After that we activate an external command via transaction SM69 by calling FM SXPG_COMMAND_EXECUTE.
This command is an execution of a batch file that executes a decryption method via PGP decryption software.
The problem is that we get an output parameter of this FM (STATUS) as u201CEu201D (error) although the decryption is being executed successfully.
We have the same process being activated same way successfully with another folders (rest is exactly the same).
Why does SXPG_COMMAND_EXECUTE return wrong status value ?
Regards,
Rebeka

SXPG_COMMAND_EXECUTE runs under certain operating system user account. Looks like that account does not have enough privileges to do what you want it to do. Look at the operating system for privileges (read,write,execute) of the user account SAPServiceuser or equivalent.
/Simo

Wrong Expiration Value of GBlink Token

Hello,
We added 7 days (604800 sec) in distributor link expiration values by admin console, now when we open URLLink.acsm file in notpad as xml file. It shows wrong <expiration> value. Expiration value should be after seven days but it before the GBlink generation date.
Please help us how to extent the link expiration time.
With Regards,
Mangal Varshney

sn72 wrote:
Do you mean that the last line in my code above should be removed? Meaning, that you get a cookie from the request and set its expiration age, then that will automatically update it (and no need to add to response)? No, I didn't mean that. A cookie will also also be set with a domain and a path. If you didn't set them manually, then the container will do it for you. If either the domain of the path differs in the another request, then you will get duplicate cookies with the same name, but on the different path. To update exact the same cookie, you should also make sure that the domain and the path are the same. With other words: obtain that cookie with the same name from the request and add it as cookie to the response, or set the domain and the path manually with a fixed value.
In my testing I found that the cookie expiration date on the browser did not get updated. Maybe my testing was wrong -- for example I should close the cookie window and open it again in order to refresh it. BTW, I was using Mozilla Firefox 2. I just upgraded to Firefox 3 and will try again.That shouldn't make any difference.

Invoice created with wrong net values at header & item

Hi Guys
Due to a wrong user exit, system created few invoices with wrong net values at header & item.
Now system does not allow to cancel those billing documents, showing error message - inconsistency in data.
Eg: Billing Header net value is 10000
Billing Item net value is 5000
when I try to cancel this billing document, cancellation document created with header net value as 5000 & item net value also 5000. So, it says original invoice & cancellation invoice having different values. It is not possible to cancel.
Please suggest me how to correct wrong values at original invoice, which are already released to Accounting. Or else, how to cancel those kind of invoices.
Thanks in Advance
Regards
Uma

Hi,
In the original invoice and cancellation invoie is created there is a difference in 5000. It will not allow further cancellation of the invoice because it is already cancelled. I don't know whether there is anyway to reverse the cancellation invoice document.
If it is there then reverse the cancel invoice document and create an invoice correction request document (RK)
Try to replicate the scenario in your test system.
Prase

Error in using ABAP OLE wrong cell value

Dear All..
I'm facing a problem while using ABAP OLE..
the problem is the ABAP OLE writes the wrong value in Excel file
the value is 121.000 but it written in Excel file : 121
the weird thing is .. other value of 9.000.000 written correctly in Excel File .. and also lots of other values..
i've trace the value until it goes to the method of :
CALL METHOD OF h_excel 'Cells' = h_zl
     EXPORTING
       #1 = i_row
       #2 = i_col.
   SET PROPERTY OF h_zl 'Value' = i_value.
   GET PROPERTY OF h_zl 'Font' = h_f.
   IF i_bold = 'X'.
     SET PROPERTY OF h_f 'Bold' = 1.
   ENDIF.
   and the values of variable i_value is still correct which is : 121.000 but after writing in excel it becomes 121
   i believe it will become faulty at the specific amount with format of XXX.000 because if I changed the value to 121.001 it displays correctly in Excel file..
i_value is a pass value from variable ld_val with data type of is --> ld_val(20) type n.
is this are originally bugs from the OLE ? how to solved it ?
please advice ..

yes it is clear, but how excel manage the passed data is unclear.
However, to solve you can try this:
DATA : ld_val(20).
WRITE value1 TO ld_val CURRENCY CURR.
REPLACE ALL OCCURRENCES OF '.' IN ld_val WITH space.
CALL METHOD OF h_excel 'Cells' = h_zl
     EXPORTING
     #1 = i_row
     #2 = i_col.
   SET PROPERTY OF h_zl 'Value' = ld_val.
   GET PROPERTY OF h_zl 'Font' = h_f.
   IF i_bold = 'X'.
     SET PROPERTY OF h_f 'Bold' = 1.
   ENDIF.
Regards,
Angelo.

DI API: Wrong PriceAfterVAT value in credit note based on A/R invoice

Hi all,
I have serious problem with creating Credit Note based on existing A/R Invoice in Sales module.
I use SBO 2004A patch level 32. With SDK I've created A/R Invoice with 2 items. First item has discount percent 0% and price after VAT 1. Second item has 100% discount, this means, doctotal is 1. Document VAT is 7,6% and VAT is calculated correctly in invoice. Then I've created credit note only with 1 item and this row is bounded with 1 row in invoice. After calling oCreditNote.Add, in Business One this credit note has all prices (price, price after VAT, row total) with the same value -> there is no vat calculated although in invoice the vat calculated is.
Is it bug in DI API or do I something wrong?
I use the standard ways to create new invoice and credit note through DI API.
Many thanks for your answers.
Best regards
Libor.

Hi Libor,
To create a Credit note for a Invoice you should use the Invoice as the base document for the Credit note. Here is an example of how I create a GRPO from a draft GRPO. Try this (for your Invoice - Credit Note) and see if it does not work for you (SAP suggests this way of doing it).
(Draft will be your invoice - GRPO will be your credit note)
Dim oDraft As SAPbobsCOM.Documents
Dim oGRPO As SAPbobsCOM.Documents
If oDraft.GetByKey(YourInvoiceNumber) Then
                        'Build the GRPO (new GRPO Obj for each GRPO Doc)
                        oGRPO = oComp.GetBusinessObject(SAPbobsCOM.BoObjectTypes.oPurchaseDeliveryNotes)
                        oGRPO.DocDate = oDraft.DocDate
                        oGRPO.DocDueDate = oDraft.DocDueDate
                        oGRPO.DiscountPercent = oDraft.DiscountPercent
                        oGRPO.CardCode = oDraft.CardCode
                        For i = 0 To oDraft.Lines.Count - 1
                            oDraft.Lines.SetCurrentLine(i)
                            oGRPO.Lines.BaseType = oDraft.Lines.BaseType
                            oGRPO.Lines.BaseEntry = oDraft.Lines.BaseEntry
                            oGRPO.Lines.BaseLine = oDraft.Lines.BaseLine
                            If i < oDraft.Lines.Count - 1 Then
                                oGRPO.Lines.Add()
                            End If
                        Next i
                        'Add the GRPO
                        iRetCode = oGRPO.Add
                        If iRetCode <> 0 Then
                            oComp.GetLastError(iRetCode, sErrMsg)
                            Log.WriteLog("Error Adding GRPO : " & sErrMsg, EventLogEntryType.Warning)
                            Return False
                        End If
                    End If

Wrong excise value is calculated in billing doc. = VF01.

Dear All ,
I have created a billing doc for a STO , now my price of 1 ton is Rs 57328.94 & in billing the Con for exc is JEXP it is for,14 % but the exc cal culating as Rs 8329.61 , instead of Rs 8026.05 here the wrong calculated Rs 8329.61 is 14.529 % of Rs 57328.94 .so i m in VF03 now selected the cond type & clicked on detail icon here what i see that the a screen opens for header cond. details , here in cond details tab the amount coming as 14 % , Cond base value is Zero & Cond value is Rs 57328.94 , After this on the same scren i had clikced on Go to -
> cond record --> here also 14 % is given then how the system is calculating 14.529 % instead of 14 % .
Rgds
sap12

in the STO under cond tab at item level i had clicked on analysis tab then the con appearing are as under --->
Condition type     Message     Description
P101     213     Amount copied from material valuation data
FRB1     207     Condition has been found (without condition record)
FRC1     207     Condition has been found (without condition record)
FRA1     207     Condition has been found (without condition record)
Y017     207     Condition has been found (without condition record)
Y018     207     Condition has been found (without condition record)
Y019     207     Condition has been found (without condition record)
Y020     207     Condition has been found (without condition record)
Y015     207     Condition has been found (without condition record)
Total Cost     200     Subtotal
Here there is no JEXP , now as u wrote thjat to check the excise rate in J1ID -
> there is no excise rate made for this material , after this ---> in exceptional exc rate there are no entries., now pl guide that what to check .
Rgds
sap12

Wrong Excise values posted in MIGO

Hi all,
This is Depot scenario.
User has posted wrong values in Excise tab in MIGO & posted GR. Excise values are updated in Table RG23D.
The same material is already disptached to the customer end.
Currently there is No stock of material in the system.
Now User wants to reverse all this wrong duties.
How to resolve this issue?
Pls suggest solution
Sameer

Hi,
Please reverse the material document in MIGO.
Regards,
Smitha

MIGO HEADER WRONG EXCISE VALUE

Hi,
While doing Migo with excise option, in the header excice tab, BED is calculating wrongly ..
Basic - Rs 1000
BED - 14% - Rs 1400 instead of Rs 140
where in item column, the exicse values are flowed correcly.
pls suggest, where is the mistake..

I am also facing the same problem any answers

CIN--MIGO--Wrong excise value

Hi Buddies,
We created STO from Plant to Plant and taken SD side to the delivery and profoma and then excise invoice.
In this case, we created one STO- with four deliveries(with partial quantity) -one proforma(combining all deliveries in one proforma invoice) and one excise invoice with refercencing the proforma in SD. While doing MIGO(goods receipt in MM), if we give delivery number and excise invoice number, automatically it is picking the last line item of excise invoice. All BED,ECESS,SCESS is calculating wrongly in MIGO.
We noted that, system is always picking that last delivery excise value for each and every delivery in MIGO.
Regards,
G.Rajesh.

hi
we also faced similar problem and we done the corrections in the userexit
Can you please go through the SAP note mentioned below and apply.
1042035
1035545
1003634
If you mark the Condition category as 'H' for the Price condition
which has the assesable value then the Excise base value will flow but the price condition should be non statistical, if it is statistical in
your pricing procedure then you will have use the user exit
J_1I7_USEREXIT_CALC_EXC_BASE which has the KONV structure , you will
have to pass the value to the parameter EXCITM_BASE
hope it will help you in resolve the issue.
with regards
baalakrushnan.da

Wrong data values displayed for YTD in reports

Hi,
In my reports when i try to select measures as YTD, eg. March 2010 YTD, i get wrong values for entities. But, apart from YTD, i get absolutely correct values if i select measures as anually, quarterly or monthly.
I have checked ISBEGINNING property in time dimension and assigned values as 0 and 1 for the respective values. I have also checked if i have any wrong statements in dbo.measureformula in SQL server Management studio which might give wrong calculations but could not find any.
Please guide me through.
Many thanks in advance.
Regards,
Poonam

HI Nilanjan,
Thanks for your suggestions but i do not have any data in Apshell to test if it is being displayed correct or not.
Please advice me further.
Regards,

Wrong payer value while creating PRO FORMA invoice for multiple delivery

Hi experts,
I am trying to create PRO FORMA Invoice for multiple deliveries thru VF01.
The problem here is the payer value is copied as the value of payer for the first delivery to all invoices. All other fields are picked up properly.
Please help me to idenify the problem. Also if I create the invoices thru VF04 the invoices the created with correct payer.
Thanks in advance.

Hi Ankur,
Thanx for the input.
Right now we have customized routine 909 for header level and std. routine 004 for item level.
Code for routine 909 is
FORM BEDINGUNG_PRUEFEN_909.
SY-SUBRC = 0.
Fakturasperre
IF LIKP-FAKSK NE SPACE.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM TVFSP WHERE FAKSP = LIKP-FAKSK
AND FKART = TVFK-FKART.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
PERFORM VBFS_HINZUFUEGEN USING '000000' '014' SPACE SPACE SPACE.
SY-SUBRC = 4.
EXIT.
ENDIF.
SY-SUBRC = 0.
ENDIF.
break-point.
SELECT * FROM VBFA WHERE VBELV = LIKP-VBELN.
IF VBFA-VBTYP_N = 'U' .
PERFORM VBFS_HINZUFUEGEN USING '000000' '148' LIKP-VBELN
SPACE SPACE.
SY-SUBRC = 4.
Insert + Unicode/Upgrade Project
STOP.
LEAVE SCREEN.
Insert - Unicode/Upgrade Project
ENDIF.
ENDSELECT.
ENDFORM.
can u please check n confirm if the wrong value is coming due to this code?
Thank in advance.

SPListItemCollection.GetDataTable() delivers wrong Double Values

Hi there,
i have a Problem with the .getDataTable() Method of a SPListItemCollection Object. Within the SPListItemCollection all Double Values are displayed correct. But the DataTable Edition puts the decimal point to the End of the number. And i have no idea why,
and how to get rid of this. Any hints?
DataTable dt = new DataTable("ChargeData");
listItems[0]["PRICE"] -> 107.10 | object {double}
dt = listItems.GetDataTable();
dt[0]["PRICE"] -> 10071.0 | object {double}
P.s.: If this is realted in some way, the initial List for the SPListItemCollection is a External List with a MSSQL Connection. The 'Price' Column within the SQL Server is a "float".
My Best Regards
THO
EDIT #1
I've try to figure out when this problem appears. Always or only on BCS lists, so i tried (with Powershell), and found out, this seems to be a Problem with the Autogenerated BCS List.
$nonbcslist.Items[0]["PRICE"] -> 107,10 | double
$dt = $nonbcslist.Items.GetDataTable()
$dt.Rows[0]["PRICE"] -> 107,10 | double
$bcslist.Items[0]["PRICE"] -> 107,10 | double
$bcsdt = $bcslist.Items.GetDataTable()
$bcsdt.Rows[0]["PRICE"] -> 10710 | double

I noticed that in one example you are using a period to segment the double and in the other a comma. I wonder if that is somehow tied into the wrong conversion when returning a data table.
I have seen GetDataTable() break some other formatting in the past, specifically when working with multi-select user fields. Your best bet may be to iterate through the collection and manually populate a blank table.
Dimitri Ayrapetov (MCSE: SharePoint)

Wrong Condition Value

Hi Experts,
We are creating one sales order in VA01, when we are picking one condition type (ZC00) and giving quantity 1 and price 10000, it is giving wrong amount in Base price for this condition. It is showing total amount 10 only, the correct value should be 10000.
where is the problem ?
Study SAP

Hi
Check the condition record of ZC00. in VK12
Secondly check the control data of ZC00 condition type in V/06. check its Calculation type & condition category ,Condition Class
Finally check in pricing procedure wheather you have assigned any requirement , Alt calc type to that condition type or not
Regards
Srinath

Wrong SNMP values for ciscoEnvMonSupplyStatus

Hello everyone,
we are facing the following issue: the SNMP poll is showing wrong values for ciscoEnvMonSupplyStatus when at the same time the "show env all" shows that there is nothing wrong with the power supplies.
Here is the example:
ciscoEnvMonSupplyStatusDescr.1057   Sw1, PS1 Faulty, RPS NotExist                  OctetString                  192.168.49.28:161
ciscoEnvMonSupplyStatusDescr.1058   Sw1, PS2 Faulty, RPS NotExist                  OctetString                  192.168.49.28:161
ciscoEnvMonSupplyState.1057                                     notFunctioning (6)                        Integer                          192.168.49.28:161
ciscoEnvMonSupplyState.1058                                     notFunctioning (6)                        Integer                          192.168.49.28:161
------------------ show env all ------------------
FAN 1 is OK
FAN 2 is OK
FAN PS-1 is OK
FAN PS-2 is OK
SYSTEM TEMPERATURE is OK
System Temperature Value: 31 Degree Celsius
System Temperature State: GREEN
Yellow Threshold : 46 Degree Celsius
Red Threshold    : 60 Degree Celsius
SW PID                 Serial#     Status           Sys Pwr PoE Pwr Watts
1A C3KX-PWR-350WAC     AZS161803GQ OK              Good     Good     350/0
1B C3KX-PWR-350WAC     AZS161803GT OK              Good     Good     350/0
I have seen that this is a more or less a known issue and there are plenty of bugs for it, but exactly for our hardware and IOS (C3560E Software (C3560E-IPBASEK9-M), Version 15.0(2)SE2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)) I cannot find any exact information.
Please, advice if we are hitting some known bug which I cannot locate.
Thanks,
Vesselin
SW Status          RPS Name          RPS Serial# RPS Port#
1   Not Present     <>

Hi ,
I have issue while generating alerts for the CISO nexus device.
snmp laert tool: Solarwinds error : The OID is not supported,
Can anyone tell me the OID for the CISCO nexus 2k, 5K devices.
I am trying to generate the Temp alert.
THANKS

Wrong GROUP_ACCOUNT_NUM values

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for