Wrong Pricing Procedure getting picked up in Value Contract

While creating Value Contract, when we maintain conditions, the condition type which we want to maintain are missing.
During a year, PO is made a for a value of around 15 crores. So we need to make contract which will pick up the same pricing procedure which is picked up for all those PO's. The pricing procedure was specially created for these PO's.
Now while we create contract it should pick up that same pricing procedure which it picks up in the PO.
The vendor, material & Purchase Org is same in our contract as it is there in the PO.
So I feel when we create a contract it should pick the same pricing procedure as it does for PO's, but our contract picks some other pricing procedure.
what is the configuration to be done specially for Value contract.
Regards,
Karthik

Hi,
The pricing procedure is determined differenetly for contract & PO .
For PO, pricing procedure is determined by the Vendor Schema Group and Purchase Org Schema Group.
But in case of Contract the pricing procedure is based on condition supplements of condition type PB00.
Condition type PB00 is considered as master condition type in case of Pricing procedure of contract.
In std SAP contract system picks up RM0001or RM1001 because these pricing procedures are maintained in the Condition Supplements of PB00.
If you want to have pricing procedure other than RM0001 or RM1001 then you need to maintain that pricing procedure in the Condition Supplement of condition type PB00.
Regards

Similar Messages

Sometime wrong endpoint URL getting picked up at runtime at adapter engine

Hi experts,
In our production XI box, sometime wrong endpoint URL getting picked up at runtime at adapter engine.
But this scenario does not happen always. It happens sometime. I have checked url for integration engine in
SLD and also RWB->Component monitoring->integration engine, but in both the places it is correctly specified.
It is very difficult to find the root cause...please help
Thanks,
Nayan

Hi Christian,
May be it is a cluster problem...actual URL must be the URL of the cluster not any specific SAP server box....but in our case sometimes URL points to any SAP server that may or may not be within that cluster.
Please give some solution to rectify it.
Thanks,
Nayan

Transfer pricing not getting picked

Hi,
I have done the following set up for transfer pricing:
Activated ML for parallel valuation for legal and profit center valuation
Activated Profit center valuation in PCA settings
Did profit center transfer price settings with one condition type-TP01 with “Fixed price” indicator
Created a transfer price variant 000 and linked the same to pricing procedure TP0001
Maintained condition records for TP01 with fixed price of 5 EUR. Access sequence is based on plant, receiving profit center and material
Created two versions- 0 for legal and 8 for PCA valuation. Linked the TP variant 000 in version 8
Configured account determination for profit center postings
My material master profit center is 1000. I am issuing stock to cost center 2000 which is having profit center 1001. System is picking the material master price from profit center valuation view. I was expecting it to value the same at 5 EUR/unit.
Could you please let me know if I am missing some settings?
Regards
Suresh

Hi,
Thanks everyone..I have found the solution for this. My condition records were wrongly maintained. Now its working fine.
Regards
Suresh

Billing pricing not getting picked up

I created a sales invoice with reference a sales order. In the sales order the price was getting picked up and was displayed.
Delivery was also created. But when the invoice was created and saved the net value is shown as 0. Price is not getting picked up.
The option which many other consultants has given was to cancel the invoice and re create a new invoice. But we want the price to be picked in the same invoice.
This happened only for 5 invoices which was created on a particular day. These 5 inovices show a net value of 0.
Could you please help me out to resolve this issue.
Thanks very much.

Hi,
Please check if the document pricing procedure is same for Order type and billing type.
If its not same please check what is the pricing procedure system taking for Billing document procedure.
In that pricing procedure check what is the Base price condition type.
Check whether condition records maintained for that condition type.
Iff no records maintain then use VK11 to create new condition records.
Then go to Item data - Conditions in billing document press Update button and use B-Carry out new pricing.
Revert if you need more elaborate explanation.
Best Regards,

External Service Mangement Service Pricing Procedure not picking up in PO

Hi ,
We have an issue with External Services pricing procedure:
In SPRO->MM->External services Management->Maintain Conditions for Service
Have defined and assigned Schema for Services , but when I make a PO entry the pricing procedure is not picked.
I have maintined condition types , and defined schema procedure for services and there after have assigned service pricing procedure to document type for PO.
I get a message 'Conditions for service price determination incomplete'. And the conditions which are populated are from a different pricing procedure.
Please help me sort the issue.
Thanks

Hi,
This error triggers in case of own pricing procedure or changes to standard pricing procedure. Other reasons could be the price calculation schema is not set up for External Services Management or calculation schema not adopted from client 0 when system configured. Please refer following notes. Thanking you.
SAP Note No. 25357 MM-SRV: Error in the case of service conditions
SAP Note No. 27024 MM-SRV: Setting up components (services)

Wrong Pricing Procedure in CR document type

When we create a CR/credit request with reference to an OR/order (pricing procedure=ZRVFK1) the pricing procedure in the CR = ZRVFK3 which is correct. However when we create a CR with reference to the F1/billing document Pricing procedure=ZRVFK1) the pricing procedure in CR = ZRVFK1 instead of ZRVFK3. How do I correct this?
Thank you, Julie

In the copying controls (VTFA) from billing document type to sales document type maintain 053 data transfer routine in the field "Copying requirements for data transfer VBAK".
Regards,
GSL.

Wrong Execution Plan getting picked on some occassions

Hi,
The following query sometimes runs efficiently; gives quick results, CPU and IO utilization is also up to the mark. But sometimes the query takes very long time to execute.
At that time I do not observe any blocks as well. Also the CPU and IO is too huge for running this query. It seems the engine picks up wrong execution plan some times.
This query is fired through some product. So there is no scope to change the query. Any suggestions for the engine to pick up right execution plan?
select i . bpd_instance_id as instanceId , i . instance_name as instanceName , bpd . name as bpdName , istatus . name as instanceStatus , t . subject as taskSubject , tpriority . name as taskPriority , t . due_date as taskDueDate , t . attached_form_ref as taskAttachedInfoPathFormRef , t . attached_ext_activity_ref as taskAttachedExtActivityRef , t . task_id as taskId , tstatus . name as taskStatus , tuser . user_name as assignedToUser , tpriority . ranking as taskPriorityRanking from msadmin.lsw_task t with ( nolock ) inner join msadmin.lsw_bpd_instance i with ( nolock ) on t . bpd_instance_id = i . bpd_instance_id left join msadmin.lsw_task_status_codes tstatus on t . status = tstatus . status_value left join msadmin.lsw_bpd_status_codes istatus on i . execution_status = istatus . status_id left join msadmin.lsw_priority tpriority on t . priority_id = tpriority . priority_id left join msadmin.lsw_bpd bpd on i . cached_bpd_version_id = bpd . version_id left join msadmin.lsw_usr_xref tuser on t . user_id = tuser . user_id where ( t . status in ( '11','12' ) and ( t . user_id = 5909 or t . task_id in (
select t . task_id
from msadmin.lsw_task t with ( NOLOCK )
inner join msadmin.lsw_usr_grp_mem_xref m with ( NOLOCK )
on t . group_id = m . group_id
where m . user_id = 5909
and t . user_id = -1
) or t . task_id in (
select t . task_id
from msadmin.lsw_task t with ( NOLOCK )
inner join msadmin.lsw_grp_grp_mem_exploded_xref x with ( NOLOCK )
on t . group_id = x . container_group_id
inner join msadmin.lsw_usr_grp_mem_xref m with ( NOLOCK )
on m . group_id = x . group_id
where m . user_id = 5909
and t . user_id = -1
) ) ) order by taskDueDate , taskPriorityRanking , instanceId , taskId

Is it a good practive to update a stat nightly on all the tables with FULL SCAN? will it help to boost the performance?
Maybe. But it may also be overkill, particularly if you do not have the hours. A somewhat better option may be to run with FULLSCAN, INDEX to only update the statistics for indexes. But note that if you rebuild an index, that updates the statistics for that
index with FULLSCAN anyway.
But overall, there are rarely any magic button to performance tuning. In the end, you will need to do the hard work to find the painful queries that need better indexes or needs to be rewritten.
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, [email protected]

Wrong business system getting picked up

hi
I have a SAP A to SAP B ( sync proxy to Proxy ) scenario...
Here I have created a Business system called SAP_BACKEND for SAP A...
When a message is sent from SAP A and I check in SXMB_Moni in SAP A the sender system is not SAP_BACKEND but R3_SAP like that
how do i change this because this is giving me no receiver determined error

SAP_BACKEND is pointing to the tech system and client of SAP A...
Also I have imported it correctly in ID....
R3_SAP is not in SLD.....
How do I check the integration engine config of SAP A ( I checked in SXMB_ADM->integration engine config and it is pointing to PI )
My observation -- SAP A was earlier pointing to some other PI system . could this be a problem?

Replacing of the pricing procedure by a different pricing procedure .

Hi
We are process of changing the pricing procedure of the particular sales process.
In case of old open sales order after changing pricing procedure if i update it in VA02 mode then also ...it is not picking the current sales order ...
Again in case of sales order where deivery has been done ...for them while creating billing ...it is taking current pricing procedure so that there is a mismatch of sales order amount and billing amount .
Again while creating return order w r t old sales order ...it is taking current pricing procedure in return order instead of taking the original one ....
Pls advice how to rectify this problem .
Thanks in Advance
Regards
Mrinal

Dear Lakshmipati,
I told I am in process of changing pricing procedure .
Currently normal pricing procedure is configured in the system. Now business wants to change it in list price pricing procedure ( i.e base price with tax pricing procedure ) . And new pricing procedure has some extra automatic discount value also .
My question was
1) There is no change in open sales order ....IT is OK
2) But for sales order where already delivery has been done then after changing pricing procedure it is taking new pricing procedure so that ..sales value and billing amounts are getting different . How to restrict this .?
3)For return order also ...it is taking new pricing procedure ... How to restrict the same ?
Regards
MKC

Different Tax base in pricing procedure for a single sales order for different line item material.

Hi,
I have a scenario wherein in a sales order, for two different material, the tax base of pricing should get triggered on the basis of sold to party and the material entered at line item level.
Logic triggers on the basis of Region of Customer & a unique field in the Material Master but problem comes in the calculation of Tax base as the sequence of condition type (from – to) is already defined in the pricing procedure to pick from a particular step but in second line item the base is different i.e. the sequence of condition types that are maintained in pricing procedure should be different for Tax to calculate differently.
Kindly suggest if the same can be handled in a single pricing procedure and dynamically taking care of condition type sequence through Alt Cal Base Formula, so far I’ve tried both Alt Cal Formula & Base but it is not working
Client doesn’t want to go ahead by creating two different orders (through separate Pricing Procedure) for that. They want to have both materials in same order.
Kindly suggest a suitable way to handle this scenario.
Regards,
Aashika Agarwal

Hi,
Click on the ''check availability'' button at item overview and then click on ''One-time delivery'' on the top. This will ensure that you will have only one delivery for whatever quantity is confirmed on that date.
If you want to apply this rule for all orders across a sales area, then you can do the below configuration step :
SPRO->sales and distribution->basic functions->availability check with ATP logic->Define default settings-> Here in avail. checking rule select A (one time delivery). This will ensure that all orders created for a particular sales area will have only one delivery.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Palani

Step number in the pricing procedure

Hi experts,
Pls advise the reasons. How to solve them without changing the step number?
Q1: As long as HM00 is the first step number in the pricing procedure, the value of HM00 cannot be distributed among items.
Example:
Pricing procedure:
step no.         conditon type
10                      HM00 (statistical)
30                      NETW (ERL)
Sales order (HM00 = $100):
item 1     NETW = 0
item 2     NETW = $100
Q2: When putting a conditon type between PR00 & subtotal in the pricing procedure, such as VPRS, the value of subtotal cannot be the same as PR00.
Example of sales order:
PR00 (unit price) = $19.95 per 10kg
VPRS (internal price) = $10 per 1kg
subtotal = $2 per 1kg
Request: PR00 = subtotal = $19.95 per 10kg

hello, cathy.
i do not have access to my references now, but please allow me to advance a general concept.
in SAP standard, HM00 is a group condition, and fixed value. the distribution of this value is controlled by certain logic. as in other header condition types, distribution of this amount can be based on either the value or quantity contribution of the different sales order items.
what serves as the basis for distribution of HM00, i do not recall but i will get back to you on this... or perhaps another consultant can give it sooner.
as to your second issue, i will try to understand your situation better. but generally VPRS is statitical and not meant to come between PR00 and the sub-total. VPRS has a different logic compared to the other condition types, and is intended to return a statistical presentation of profit margin in the condition tabs. if fact, in pricing procedure RVAA01 you will notice that VPRS is grouped with the other statistical condition types just before the profit margin.
regards.

MM Pricing procedure change

Hi All,
Can you help with a problem I am facing. I have the requirement to add a new condition type to a MM pricing procedure. Upon recomendation from SAP I beleive that I should do this by copying the old one to a new code. My problem is this. We currently use scheduling agreements which contain the pricing procedure in EKKO. So my new pricing procedure will not take effect until I create an entirely new SA (which is not an option at the moment).
Any ideas?????

Hi,
In the existing SA's u can use the new condition type u create unless subsequent transactions have happened for the SA.
Delete the existing condition type & add the new one.
If subsequent transactions have been done, delete the existing one & prepare the new one, if the pricing is getting picked for subsequent transactions from SA.
Regards,
Sourabh

Different pricing procedure

Hi gurus,
              I have entered two items in document type MV with two item categories MVN and TAO. while doing billing this rental contract, For the first item(MVN), system picks the same pricing procedure as of contract(PSER01) and whereas for the second item(TAO), the system picks different pricing procedure
(RVAA01). How it happens. can anyone share your inputs.
Regards
Sankar.S

Hello
One billing document cannot have two pricing procedures.Therefore all the items in a billing documents
will always have one pricing procedure.
What seems from your description is that you might have a case where both the items are in two separate billing documents.If this is the case then your the pricing procedure is being redetermined at the time of billinng.
Please check the following for the item where wrong pricing procedure is being determined
1) Check the billing type you are using.
2) Check the copy control (VTFA) for the billing item category and confirm if the pricing type refers
    to redetermination of pricing.Ensure that you need repricing.If you need then system may redetermine
    the pricing procedure in your billing document based on the settings in customizing
3) If you want repricing and at the same time do not want pricing procedure to change, then check the
    customizing of billing type(VOFA) and see what document pricing procedure is assigned.Then
    confirm which document pricing procedure is being used for your contract (VOV8).Assign the same
    document pricing procedure to the billing type
Hope it helps.
Thanks
Vikas

Updating Pricing procedure

Hi
I have a situation here where some of the contracts picked up wrong pricing procedure as the CMD was not set up correctly. Now the CMD is updated with the right pricing procedure, so is there any way that we can update the pricing procedure of the contracts or we need to end date the old contracts and create new ones?
Thanks
Syed

Like Shiva was saying you might need to recreate the contracts (copy them in new ones), so they pick up the right procedure.
You can ask you abaper for BAPI or try LSMW.
Regards
Sidi

Problem in pricing procedure of scheduling agreement

Dear All,
I am creating a scheduling agreement, when i am giving condition type at item level a message occur "Condition type XXXX is not in procedure A M ZB1002" Message no. VK045.
I am not able to understand from where this pricing procedure is picking. But in Define Schema Determination the pricing procedure is different, it is ZBLOSR.
The same case is happening in info record while maintaining condition type, the same pricing procedure ZB1002 is picking up by default. I want to change the pricing procedure.
Please help.....

hi..
have u maintained the combination of schema group for vendor schema group, purchasing org and pricing procedure...
and assign this vendor schema group to vendor master...
From this combination system getch the pricing procedure for particular vendor...
go to spro..MM ..Purchasing..Condition...Define Price Determination Process..Define Schema Group..
check these settings...
Hope it works..
Thanks..

Wrong Pricing Procedure getting picked up in Value Contract

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for