Wrong SNMP values for ciscoEnvMonSupplyStatus

Hello everyone,
we are facing the following issue: the SNMP poll is showing wrong values for ciscoEnvMonSupplyStatus when at the same time the "show env all" shows that there is nothing wrong with the power supplies.
Here is the example:
ciscoEnvMonSupplyStatusDescr.1057   Sw1, PS1 Faulty, RPS NotExist                  OctetString                  192.168.49.28:161
ciscoEnvMonSupplyStatusDescr.1058   Sw1, PS2 Faulty, RPS NotExist                  OctetString                  192.168.49.28:161
ciscoEnvMonSupplyState.1057                                     notFunctioning (6)                        Integer                          192.168.49.28:161
ciscoEnvMonSupplyState.1058                                     notFunctioning (6)                        Integer                          192.168.49.28:161
------------------ show env all ------------------
FAN 1 is OK
FAN 2 is OK
FAN PS-1 is OK
FAN PS-2 is OK
SYSTEM TEMPERATURE is OK
System Temperature Value: 31 Degree Celsius
System Temperature State: GREEN
Yellow Threshold : 46 Degree Celsius
Red Threshold    : 60 Degree Celsius
SW  PID                 Serial#     Status           Sys Pwr  PoE Pwr  Watts
1A  C3KX-PWR-350WAC     AZS161803GQ OK              Good     Good     350/0
1B  C3KX-PWR-350WAC     AZS161803GT OK              Good     Good     350/0
I have seen that this is a more or less a known issue and there are plenty of bugs for it, but exactly for our hardware and IOS (C3560E Software (C3560E-IPBASEK9-M), Version 15.0(2)SE2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)) I cannot find any exact information.
Please, advice if we are hitting some known bug which I cannot locate.
Thanks,
Vesselin
SW  Status          RPS Name          RPS Serial#  RPS Port#
1   Not Present     <>

Hi ,
I have issue while generating alerts for the CISO nexus device.
snmp laert tool: Solarwinds error : The OID is not supported,
Can anyone tell me the OID for the CISCO nexus 2k, 5K devices.
I am trying to generate the Temp alert.
THANKS

Similar Messages

  • FM returns wrong total value for Limit type PO's

    Hi all,
    I am working on SRM 5.0 (SP13) ECS.
    I have implemented the BADI "BBP_WFL_APPROVAL_BADI" for determining the Approvers for PO whenevr a PO is changed.If the diference between the Old PO value and new PO value is > 1000 and the approval text field(custom text under "Documents" link) is set to "YES",then the WF approval is required and the approvers are determined.
    The above logic works fine for the Standard type PO's where the difference between the old value and new value is determined using FM "BBP_PD_PO_GETDETAIL"  by passing the GUID (for the change version and the active vesion) obtained at runtime in the BADI.
    However for the limit type PO's,whenevr I change the total value for the Limit item,I see that the FM "BBP_PD_PO_GETDETAIL" doesnt return the changed value but  always returns blank!
    Bcause I need to check bth the values i.e. Custom text set to "YES" as well as Total value diff ,I cant use the start conditions in tcode SWB_COND.ALso I need to fetch the approvers based on the price diff so I need this value at runtime in the BADI using the FM "BBP_PD_PO_GETDETAIL".
    Please advise why the FM is not returning the changed values for the Limit type PO and is there any other way(other table/FM) to get the changed value at runtime for the LIMIT type PO.
    Thanks for your time.
    Edited by: Rads1234 on Nov 18, 2010 4:39 AM

    Thanks for the rpely.
    Yes.I am using the GUID available at runtime in the  BADI "BBP_WFL_APPROV_BADI" which is the current change version GUID.I tried using that GUID to get the data from both FM as well as CDHDR and CDPOS tables.
    I think this is something related to LImit type PO because for Standard type PO's the FM returns the corretc changed value (as in the screen) for the change version GUID.I fail to understand why the changed values are shwon on the screen but are not stored anywhere in the system before actually ordering the PO!

  • Wrong ASCII values for control characters in Variables and Stack Call in CVI2013?

    Hi,
    I think there is an error in  "Variables and Call Stack" window if you want to look for your variables in ASCII format.
    The control characters (0 -  31) are not shown correct. They are shifted 2.
    For example:
    Character in Decimal format is 10 (LF) but when you are chancing to ASCII format it is showing \012.
    The same with 13 (CR). This character is \015 in ASCII format.
    I think that was no problem in CVI2012.
    Best regards
    Gunther
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    I'm not using CVI2013 yes so I cannot respond regarding this specific product, but the code you are showing are the octal equivalent of the decimal value you specified: it could be that control characters (or generally speacking non-printable ones) are replaced with their octal equivalent in string view.
    Proud to use LW/CVI from 3.1 on.
    My contributions to the Developer Zone Community
    If I have helped you, why not giving me a kudos?

  • Wrong commitments value for a wbs element

    H Experts
    I have a WBS element and entered a PO commitment with subsequent partial GR and IRs.
    But my cooitment report does not get reduced with subsequent IRs and it got updated with first IR only.
    Please suggest what would be the reason for wrong commitment report.
    Thanks
    ramSiva

    run the programs RAKNBU01and  there is a note  for incorrect committments........... 1491430     Incorrect Commitments for Service Items and
    1492317     Incorrect commitments after posting service entry sheet
    Edited by: reena ghadge on Nov 25, 2011 12:54 PM

  • IDoc - Wrongly Picking value for outbound.

    Guru's
    Once save the sales order, a out bound idoc will trigger and goto a non sap system.. till date its picking right values but now its not picking one number(that is year) <b>Voyage number</b> starts with year example 2007 is equal to 7 and other two digits  is serial numabre.. 701, 702, etc....now its not picking 7,  only taking 03, 04.. ...
    any inputs...
    Ramki

    Debugging is the only option to find your problem.
    Put breakpoint on segment which you are having problem. or user exit, if you have any.
    If you are not familiar how to debug for outbound idocs do the following steps.
    1) Cllick header-->output
    2) Repeat output type
    3) Select output type and click Further data and select dispatch time to 1(Send with periodic schedule job).
    4) Save.
    5) Go to Transaction WE15 or execute RSNAST00 program
    6) Select your output type..input object key-->nothing but document number(eg..sales order number).
    select output type and transmission medium.
    7) Now cursor stop at your break point".
    "Rewards point if usefull"
    Thanks,
    Narayan

  • Wrong Depreciation value for subsequent years for further acquisition

    Hi All,
    Need immediate help...I have a dep key with Unit of Produciton. The method being used is Usage/Remaining and the Base Value is 24 - Net Book Value.
    I had posted an acq. on 01.01.2009...it depreciates perfectly as per my usage--say till period 5. Then another acq. was posted in july - and was consumed fully in Feb 2010..
    Another acq. was posted in May, 2010...Now my dep for period Jan and Feb is getting reversed and Dep. on Base Value - Balance Carried forward and New Acq - is being calculated, although i had exhausted my balance in Feb itself.
    I do not want to go by Sub Assets route...
    Why is such a calculation being done???

    Hi Kartik
    Thanks for showing interest in my query...If i am not worng, SAP note mentions to change everything to Start of the year...i had tried it but was of no help.
    Regards
    Ankit

  • CALCULATE_TAX_ITEM gives wrong values for Scess and HScess in PO Print

    Dear Friends,
    I am working with PO Print in smartforms hare the Fm CALCULATE_TAX_ITEM is gives wrong values for Scess and HEcess if I put the Gate pass (Basic Excise Duty) Manually.
    And one more Issue is as if I check any line item condition taxes than imediatly when I see the print the all line items Scee and HEcess displays same which I have saw.
    If there is a single line item in PO than there is no issue any way.
    kindly suggest to resolve the issue.
    Regards,
    D Tarun Kumar

    Hi,
    I had the same issue, that taxes on invoice tab of PO was not printed correctly on PO form by calling CALCULATE_TAX_ITEM.
    If you want to have the same tax value as komp-mwsbp, that use following form routine call before FB CALCULATE_TAX_ITEM.
    perform j_1b_save_tax_fields(saplmepo) using ekko ekpo lfa1.
    This is used in transaction me23n also.
    Kind regards,
    Tülay

  • Wrong depreciation calculated for base value 04 + EA-FIN activated

    Hi,
    after activating EA-FIN, depreciation for assets using base value 04 (= half of replacement value) is calculated wrong.
    While AW01 for a particular asset shows depreciation values based on the FULL replacement value (like it would be base value 03) AW01_AFAR (the u201Coldu201D asset explorer) shows the correct depreciation for base value 04.
    The wrong base value can also be seen using the "display depreciation calculation" button in both transactions.
    There are no enhancements for base value determination active.
    I didnu2019t find any SAPNET notes nor SCN entries regarding this case, any ideas?
    Best regards, Christian

    For what it's worth, I did a search and didn't find anything either. 
    It sounds like you've already tried this, but if the base value (the actual $$ value) is different in the trace on both tcodes then you have a problem.  I would be sure to recalculate the values when you enter AW01 and AW01_AFAR to ensure that it's correct before looking at the trace.
    The formula for the replacement value is: 
    ( u_ganlc-kansw + u_ganlc-answl +
                   u_ganlc-kmafa + u_ganlc-mafav + u_ganlc-zusma +
                   u_ganlc-mafam + u_ganlc-mafal +
                   u_ganlc-kaufw + u_ganlc-aufwv +
                   u_ganlc-aufwp + u_ganlc-aufwl ) / 2 .
    I'd look at ANLC for the asset and do the calculation yourself to confirm the value. 
    You've probably done all of that so I predict an OSS message in your future !
    -nathan

  • Wrong data values displayed for YTD in reports

    Hi,
    In my reports when i try to select measures as YTD, eg. March 2010 YTD, i get wrong values for entities. But, apart from YTD, i get absolutely correct values if i select measures as anually, quarterly or monthly.
    I have checked ISBEGINNING property in time dimension and assigned values as 0 and 1 for the respective values. I have also checked if i have any wrong statements in dbo.measureformula in SQL server Management studio which might give wrong calculations but could not find any.
    Please guide me through.
    Many thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Poonam

    HI Nilanjan,
    Thanks for your suggestions but i do not have any data in Apshell to test if it is being displayed correct or not.
    Please advice me further.
    Regards,

  • Wrong accounting entry for FRB2 (Freight Value)

    Dear All,
    Wrong accounting entry is happening for Freight value for a standard PO.
    Rs. 300 was maintained in PO for this condition type, GR is done for full qty. but Accounting entry is Material cccount Rs. 156.24 to Freight clearing account.
    Please help me on this issue
    Regards
    Prashant Atri

    PO was created with 3 line items with each line item having freight condition type FRB2 - Freight value
    For first line item  it is Rs.200 for 1,008 quantity
    For Second line item it is Rs.300 for 7,200 quantity
    For Third line item it is Rs.300 for 2,604 quantity
    GR was done for 3rd line item for the entire PO quantity 2604, but the frieght value is flowing only Rs. 156.24
    1) Material is valuated at Standard Price.
    It is Valuated at MAP
    2)Condition type- FRB2- Rs 300 is entered at the Header Level and it is marked as a Group condition because of which it got apportioned to all the line items in the Purchase Order.
    It is entered line itemwise with Rs.300 to the third particular line item and there is wrong flow of freight value for other line items too in GR.
    Is Freight Condition type is a header condition and also check is it a group condition ( in t.code: M/06)
    It is a header condition but not group condition and the values for frieght were given line item wise.
    Need help to resolve this.
    Edited by: prashantatri on Sep 2, 2011 12:14 PM
    Edited by: prashantatri on Sep 2, 2011 12:15 PM

  • EPMWorkstatus() - Retrieving wrong values for status

    Dear community,
    I have a very special problem concerning the EPMWorkstatus() formula within the EPM-Client. This issue only appears on our quality ensurance system (QS) and productive system (PS), not on our development System (DS).
    ------ Setup is as follows:
    workstatus is defined for three dimensions:
    project (user defined dimension with owner attribute)
    the project itsself is always a node
    there is only one level of several workpackages below
    measure/value (user defined dimension)
    several Input values such as RF or budget etc.pp.
    on node above them to organize all measures/values that are shown within the planning layout
    time (time dimension)standard time dimension (years, quarters, months) with one adjustment
    there is a top node ALL above all years
    there is element NONE which is not in the hierarchy
    All dimensions only have one hierarchy in use (PARENTH1)
    ------ Problem is as follows:
    I have designed a workstatus report that shows the status for:
    one workpackage
    one month of the year (e.g.: 2015.01) as representative for the status of the whole year, because the controllers only enter data on year level which will be disaggregated by a code fragment
    one measure / value
    The EPMWorkstatus formula looks is embedded in an Excel formula which does some checks but the EPM part looks like that:
    EPMWorkstatus(,0,EPMMemberID(cell-for-project-reference),EPMMemberID(cell-for-measure-reference),EPMMemberID(cell-for-time-refence))
    Situation is now a follows:
    I have a simple project with 3 workpackages. All of them have no explicit status, so they are in DEFAULT WORKSTATEon refresh the workstatus report shows empty cells which is perfectly fine
    I chose one workpackage and open the workstatus Dialog
    the project selection stays as it is (e.g. one workpackage)
    for the measure / value dimension I chose one element or the node above those elements
    for the time dimension I chose one year node or the top node ALL for all years
    I set the status to "closed"
    On refreshing the workstatus report all other workpackages seem to inherit the same status - so all formulas show the value "closed". Sometimes one element combination stays empty which would be the correct status.
    The table which stores the workstatus looks fine (SE38 >> UJW_WS_TEST) and only has entries for the formerly selected workpackage.
    The only way to get around this issue is to first set an explicit Status for the whole project to "open" and then do the same steps mentioned above. But this is no good solution because a master data update could bring new workpackages to the project.
    Anyways I am trying to find out why it works on the DS and not on the QS / PS.
    Could it a be a transportation problem? - As far as I checked via the web admin surface it looks the same on every System
    The owner dimension project and the Attribute values for owner look the same on every system
    It cannot be a client problem due to fact that we use one client version for all systems.
    So where could I look where the problem comes from? Any help would be really appreciated.
    Cheers,
    Gernot

    Hi Dinesh,
    thank you for your reply. The results are as follows (please see the picture):
    the development system seems to have another status ID for "open" and "closed" than the quality and productive system
    but if I set a workpackage status to "closed" (e.g. "gesperrt" in screenshot) it seems to be consistent within the workstatus table as you can see in the screenshot
    So I am not sure why that would have an impact on the workstatus...
    Cheers,
    Gernot

  • Getting wrong values  for decimal value in Bex report

    Hi,
         I am getting some problem in Bexreport decimal values.
       In ODS i am able to look the values for this key figure
      (Total PO Release Val)= 140.692,00,the same value in Bex report looks like this $ 140,692.00.
         Here one calculation is going with these above values
       % Used = 'Total PO Release Val' / 'Target Value' * 100
        as per ODS value calculation  it is correct = 140.692/1000 * 100 =14.692
       as per Bex  it is coming like this = 140,692.00/1000 *100 = 142.692.
        in Bex report Percentage valus is not considering value is taking as 140,692.00 rather than 140.692.I mean to say decemal values are ignoring while calculation in Bexreport.can you any please advice me how to comeout of this problem.Appreciate your help.
    Regards
    Ramesh

    <i> "(Total PO Release Val)= 140.692,00,the same value in Bex report looks like this $ 140,692.00."
    </i>
    How do you check the ODS value? The amount will only have two decimal places after it, so you can't have a value like 140.692,00. It seems to be an issue of user's decimal notation (where decimal is represented by comma, and thousand seperator by '.'). Go to user profile, change this setting (in default tab) to correct one (ie decimal being represented by '.') and login again and check it. The value that you see in ODS is 'one hundred forty thousand six hundred ninety two, the same that you get in Bex, only the representation is different).

  • Problem setting initial value for LOV

    Hello, everyone. This seems like it should be simple, but it's giving me lots of problems. I am trying to create my first LOV. I have a messageLovInput item called PFedFilingStatus. From the Property Inspector, I can set an Initial Value of "02", which displays when I run the page, and lets me change it and validate it using the associated LOV.
    What I would rather do is set the initial value programmatically, but here are my problems:
    If I set the value like this:
    OAMessageLovInputBean lovText = (OAMessageLovInputBean)pageLayout.findIndexedChildRecursive("PFedFilingStatus");
    lovText.setText("02");
    then the field displays properly at run time, but can't be changed. The LOV runs, but any value I select flips back to "02"
    If I set the value like this:
    lovText.setDefaultValue("02");
    then nothing seems to happen at run time. The value is not displayed at all.
    Can anyone tell me what I am doing wrong? Thanks for your help.
    --Dave                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

    Yes, that helps a bunch. Now can you tell me where that is set?
    Thanks so much.
    --Dave                                                                                                                                                                                       

  • Contract net value for Header Statistics is not correct

    There is issue with value contract. The net value for Header Statistics is not showing correctly for some contracts. Especially, when we delete the PO line items or reverse all entries (GR and IR) for PO line item.
    Contract has one line with account category ‘U’. The target value is 300,000.00 and total quantity released to date is 160,000. The net value for Header Statistics should be 140,000 but it is showing 600,000 which is over (double) the target value and user cannot release any further PO reference to this contract.
    Earlier I defined net price for line item 300,000 and I changed net price to zero and execute report RM06ENP0 but it doesn’t work.
    Please share your experience and thoughts.
    Thanks,
    Shah.

    Hi Jurgen,
    There are few Purchace orders with multiple line items and each line item for Purchase orders referencing the same line and same contract.
    There is only one Purchase order has two deleted lines against this contract.
    Theses deleted line's net price has changed to zero and there is no PO history.
    Contract released order value is correct as there is only one line, but net price is wrong. and user is getting error for target value is excedeed by $nnn when trying to create purchase order.
    Thanks,
    Shah.

  • Unable to enter Input value for an ICD

    Hi All,
    I have created an element XXX which has two input values "Pay Value" and "Class". The class has the values 'A','B','C','D'. I have created a plan and set up the rate In the calculation method I have chosen "No Standard values used".
    Now when I try to assign this ICD plan to the user in the Miscellaneous plan I am not able to enter the car class. Can someone help me with this.
    Thanks
    Shekar.

    Hi Shekar
    I find the ICD setup very 'picky'! If you get one thing wrong, it doesn't work. I have detailed below the steps I usually advise people to tek. Check your setup and see if this helps.
    1. Define Plan Type, Compensation Category = Others.
    2. Define Plan. Link to Plan Type. Plan Usage = May not be in program. On Not in program Tab - define sequence, currency, enrollment rate (per pay period?), activity reference period (Monthly). Your settings may need to be different. On Plan details tab, enter plan years.
    3. Plan enrollment requirements. On the general tab, plan sub tab, make sure the method = EXPLICIT. this allows the user to enter an input value for the ICD. THIS MAY WELL BE THE SOURCE OF YOUR PROBLEM!
    Make sure the CERTIFICATION region is UNTICKED. This can also cause ICDs not to work.
    ALLOWS UNRESTRICTED ENROLLMENT must be TICKED. Otherwise there is no eligibility to the ICD.
    On the rates subregion, make sure the run strt date is set to ENTERABLE.
    4. standard Rates form. Make sure the ACTIVITY TYPE and TAX TYPE are entered. Select the ELEMENT and the INPUT VALUE and TICK the ELEMENT AND INPUT VALUE REQUIRED field.
    On the processing Information tab - TICK ASSIGN ON ENROLMENT, DISPLAY ON ENROLLMENT and PROCESS EACH PAY PERIOD. Enter PER PAY PERIOD AMOUNT in VALUE PASSED TO PAYROLL and OTHER in COMPENSATION CATEGORY.
    Let me know if this works!
    Regards
    Tim

Maybe you are looking for