XML HTTP Header modify

Hi,
In my scenario I am calling a WebService. But when calling I am told to add the message ID also to the http header of the request XML message. Now, I am thinking about the possible options to add it to the HTTP Header.
I am taking the Message ID from proxy as a field and have to add it to the http header of the soap message.
System: PI 7.0 SP 16
Thank you for your replies.
Arman

Yes. I see it is not part of the online help. You can see the ASMA fields in the online help for the SOAP sender adapter. They are the same for the receiver adapter. You should see it in the communiacation channel.
Regards
Stefan

Similar Messages

If-Modified-Since HTTP Header

Does anyone know if BC supports the if-modified-since http header? If it doesn't - how to add it to a BC webpage?
In google guideline for SEo it states:
Make sure your web server supports the If-Modified-Since HTTP header. This feature allows your web server to tell Google whether your content has changed since we last crawled your site. Supporting this feature saves you bandwidth and overhead.
Thanks.

I hacked the Servlet myself so that it honors the if-modified-since header and returns HTTP-304 if the cached version is still ok.
lg Clemens

Teststand, modifying xml report header

1) How do I add a station gloabl variable to the XML report header? I am using standard expand.xsl.
2) Does the example on this page work to change the displaying execution time in HH:MMS format? I am not seeing the expected resutls.
http://zone.ni.com/reference/en-XX/help/370052H-01/tssuppref/infotopics/changing_time_display/
Thanks,
-TC

Hi,
Here are the answers to your queries assuming you are using teststand 4.2 or above:
1. Report header modification in expand.xsl is mentioned in the following link: http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/epd/p/id/4759
In this explanation, the text which is getting display after the report generation can be replaced by a variable(local or global) in the "Modifyreportheader" callback.
2. The display execution does work as explained by NI in the link provided.
If you want the example for the above two queries please find the attached files and explaination given below.
In the sequence file, in "ModifyReportheader" callback, the first statement includes " Locals.newstring=" <Prop Name='New_Text' Type='String' Flags='0x0'><Value>"+Locals.message+"</Value> </Prop>
where "locals.message" can be replaced by global variable.
and you need to place the "expand.xsl" in stylesheets folder. Please rename the existing "expand.xsl" and place the new one.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Surya.
Attachments:
Reportheader.zip ‏25 KB

Cisco CSS - modify http header

hi, i need to modify http hearder with the client IP address. need to modify any of the folowing fields:
1) FROM -> with client IP address
CLIENT IP -> with Client IP address
2) X-Forwarded-For -> with client IP address
3) REMOTE_ADDR -> with client IP address
please advise how do to modify http header with option 1 or 2 or 3.
Thanks.

Hi Gavin
I think I misread your question.
Question first. Is your CSS configured with one arm and doing client source natting and the server needs to see the real ip address of the client? Is that the reason why you want to insert x-forward-for header with the clients real IP address?
I did some search with CSS but the CSS doesn't seem to support this feature.
If you need to see the actual client ip address from the server, then you can do pbr from the router rather than client source natting.
regards
Andrew

Javafx media component can not modify the http header. javafx media component can not append parameter in url such as m3u8?channel=2

1. When our HLS stream server check user name and password. In http header such as the cookies value. There are not place for it.
2. The mp4 can append ?parameter=value. But m3u8 can not be appended.

1. When our HLS stream server check user name and password. In http header such as the cookies value. There are not place for it.
2. The mp4 can append ?parameter=value. But m3u8 can not be appended.

Single-Sign-On (SSO) configuration on JAVA Stack through HTTP Header method

Hello SDN community,
in the context of a Proof of Concept, we are testing the integration of Microsoft Sharepoint Portal with SAP Backend (addin) systems.
As the architecture impose use an external scenario (access from the internet), we couldn't use the Kerberos (SPNego) solution and thus we chosed the http header solution which in short uses an intermediary web server (in this case the IIS of the MOSS solution) which will act as authority.
I miss information on how the workflow works for this http header authentication method. Through the visual administrator of the addin JAVA stack, it is possible to configure each application with a customized authentication (a choice of security modules). But this all that I know.
My task is to configure SSO. From a sharepoint portal, the user should be able to access Web Dynpros and BSPs. I imagine that the very first call to a webdynpro or bsp (or maybe when we log on the sharepoint portal), the request to the WDP or BSP will first be forwareded by the intermediary server to the JAVA stack (or is it the SAP dispatcher that has to be configured).
Is there an application to be built on the java stack to deal with the authentication, modify http header?
What will the Java stack return? a sap long ticket? a token?
How will the redirect work (to by example a BSP which is in the ABAP stack)?
SAP preconise to secure with SSL the link between the intermediary web server and the JAVA stack, is IP restriction also a solution?
A lot of questions about how this SSO http header should work,
I would be very greatful for any help, or info,
Kind regards,
Tanguy Mezzano

Hi Tanguy,
to tell you the truth I'm really unsure about what you are trying to achieve. When I started posting to your thread I thought all you wanted was trying to access your J2EE engine via Browser and authenticate against the engine using HTTP Header Variables. Nevermind:
Here are some answers to your question:
in fact I did succeed, the problem was that even after domain-relaxation done by the J2EE, I had to change the domain of th SAP cookie to the bbbb.domain.com to be understood (I would have thought that all hosts in/under domain .domain would have accepted such a cookie but it seems that no...).
The server does not care about the domain because Cookies in an HTTP Request do not contain any domain information. The domain is just important when the Cookie is set by the server so your Client (Browser) will know in which cases the Cookie may be sent or not. So if your domain is xxx.yyy.domain.com and your cookie is issued to .domain.com then your Browser will definitely sent it to all hosts under .domain.com (This includes xxx.yyy.domain.com etc.)
My current scenario is: in a first request get a SAP Logon Ticket from the Java Stack, then change its domain and then directly call the backend with it.
You can do that but there is no Client involved in this scenario. So this is useful if you just want to test the functionality (e.g. authentication to J2EE using Header Variables (This works finally!!!) and then use the fetched Logon Ticket to test SSO against any trusted Backend!!)
So everything's is in a Java Client application without using any redirection.
If I understand you, you're solution is from the Browser call a servlet (which is deployed on the Java Stack and has no authentication schema) by passing to it our http header.
No, you should initially authenticate somewhere! I thought that maybe you had some resource you access before accessing the Java Stack. This could be any application (e.g. deployed on a Tomcat or JBOSS or other server or if you like even SAP J2EE). After authenticating there you are aware of the username and could use it to procceed (e.g. Authenticate against the J2EE using the same user and HTTP Header authentication for that particular user!)
That servlet will transfer the http header (with the HttpClient app) in order to get from the Java Stack a SAP Logon ticket, and then to redirect to the resource and by sending back the cookie in client browser. Am I correct?
This was just a suggestion because I realized that there was no Client ever involved in any of your testing (looked strange to me!). I was just thinking that it would be easier for you to just get the Cookie into your Browser so your Browser would do the rest for you (in your case finally send the Logon Ticket Cookie to your Backend to test SSO using Logon Tickets!).
The AuthenticatorServlet somehow serves as a Proxy to your client because your client is not able to set the Header Variable. That's why I initially suggested to use a Proxy (e.g. Apache) for that purpose. The problem is just that if you use a Proxy you will have to tell it somehow which username it should set in the Header Variable (e.g. using a URL Parameter or using a personalized client certificate and fetch the username (e.g. cn=<username> from the certificate!)
This way of doing would simplify the calls for sso for each new application needing authentication, instead of having all code each time in it...
I'm stuck again! Do you want to authenticate an End User or do you want to authenticate an application that needs to call any resources in your Backend that requires authentication?
So my problem now, is how to call the servlet from the client browser:
I'm trying to call my servlet from the browser but I don't succeed. I am able to understand how to reach a jsp from the Java Stack, but not to reach a servlet. I don't find the path to my servlet:
<FORM method="POST" action="SSORedirect2" >
A JSP is a servlet too. There is just no JAVA Class involved!
You do not need any POST Request to invoke a Servlet.
I see that my servlet is deployed, but I don't how what path to give to my form to invoke the servlet, here follows my web.xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<!DOCTYPE web-app (View Source for full doctype...)>
- <web-app>
<display-name>WEB APP</display-name>
<description>WEB APP description</description>
- <servlet>
<servlet-name>SSOredirect2</servlet-name>
<servlet-class>com.atosorigin.examples.AuthenticatorServlet</servlet-class>
</servlet>
- <servlet>
<servlet-name>SSORedirect2.jsp</servlet-name>
<jsp-file>/SSORedirect2.jsp</jsp-file>
</servlet>
- <security-constraint>
<display-name>SecurityConstraint</display-name>
- <web-resource-collection>
<web-resource-name>WebResource</web-resource-name>
<url-pattern>/*</url-pattern>
<http-method>GET</http-method>
<http-method>POST</http-method>
</web-resource-collection>
- <auth-constraint>
<role-name>DefaultSecurityRole</role-name>
</auth-constraint>
</security-constraint>
- <security-role>
<role-name>DefaultSecurityRole</role-name>
</security-role>
</web-app>
If you have an AuthenticatorServlet Class all you need is to add the Servlet Mapping in your web.xml file
e.g.
<servlet>
<description>
</description>
<display-name>AuthenticatorServlet</display-name>
<servlet-name>AuthenticatorServlet</servlet-name>
<servlet-class>com.atosorigin.examples.AuthenticatorServlet</servlet-class>
</servlet>
<servlet-mapping>
<servlet-name>AuthenticatorServlet</servlet-name>
<url-pattern>/AuthenticatorServlet</url-pattern>
</servlet-mapping>
You can directly call the Servlet in your Browser by calling the URL provided in the url-pattern of your Servlet mapping ( in this case /AuthenticatorServlet). The engine will invoke the Class "com.atosorigin.examples.AuthenticatorServlet" in the background and do whatever you defined there!
I have also to pass my http header and the redirectUrl in the GET request.
If you like! I just suggested this for testing purposes. As I stated before you need a way to tell your proxy (or in your case AuthenticatorServlet) which user should be set when calling the Engine in order to authenticate using HTTP Header. You could use the URL Paramater to define the user you actually want to use when you set the Header Variable.
I just introduced the redirectURL because you were talking about redirects all the time. So if you finally want to call the Backend you could define the Backend URL in the redirectURL Parameter and the Servlet will make sure that you are redirected to this location after the whole process!
Thx for your input very helpful,
But again 0 points
Cheers

Errors with Resource Adapter with data source as "http header"

hi Team,
The objective was to create a ResourceAdapter that will get accountid from http-header and automatically log me in. More like Siteminder, Tivoli Access Mgr.
In the adapter's "prototype.xml", I added this line.
"<AuthnProperty name='sauid' displayName='UserID in From Browser' formFieldType='text' isId='true' dataSource='http header'/>
I enable pass-through authn for "user-interface" app.
My test passes, when I login to "/idm/user". I am not prompted for uid/pwd instead I am
transparently logged and presented with self-service page, aka single-sign-on. so far so good.
But, I have an issue when when I login to /idm (not /idm/user) as configurator and then try to create a new user.....I donot see the set password fields in modify.jsp. This issue is only apparent if I set enable pass-through for user-interface. If I reset the user interface to default, which is userid/pwd, then I do see set-password-fields in modify.jsp.
Any leads on why this could be happening?

Hi Asam,
If we want to create a parameter depend on another dataset, we can additional create or add the dataset, embedded or shared, that has a query that contains query variables. Then use the option that “Get values from a
query” to get available values. For more details, please see:http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd283107.aspx
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd220464.aspx
As to the Report Builder features, we can refer to the following articles:http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh213578.aspx
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh965699.aspx
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Katherine Xiong
Katherine Xiong
TechNet Community Support

Mapviewer SVG and Content-Type http header

Hello,
We have a Mapviewer installation that seems to be serving up the wrong Content-Type header for the SVG charts. The map is being created correctly and we can get GIF's and such.
The wrong Content-Type causes the Adobe SVG viewer to never render the SVG map successfully. When I save the SVG file to the desktop it opens perfectly or if I statically link it in to the web page from the sever it also opens perfectly. Is there some configuration that is missing somewhere on the mapviewer or the application server to correctly set the Content-Type ?
Notice the content type of the failing map compared to a working SVG chart we have.
HTTP/1.x 200 OK
Content-Length: 41979
Cache-Control: private
Content-Type: application/octet-streamConnection: Keep-Alive
Keep-Alive: timeout=5, max=999
Server: Oracle-Application-Server-10g/10.1.2.0.0 Oracle-HTTP-Server OracleAS-Web-Cache-10g/10.1.2.0.0 (N;ecid=92576875655,0)
Last-Modified: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 20:31:58 GMT
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 20:32:01 GMT
Accept-Ranges: bytes
instead of a working SVG graphic
HTTP/1.x 200 OK
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 20:35:32 GMT
Server: Oracle9iAS/9.0.2 Oracle HTTP Server Oracle9iAS-Web-Cache/9.0.3
Content-Length: 3831
Content-Type: image/svg+xml; charset=utf-8Connection: Keep-Alive
Keep-Alive: timeout=5, max=999
This seems to be the last sticking point in successfully rolling out this mapviewer implementation. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks, in advance.
Thanks,
Carl

Hello,
Thanks for the reply I've tried both SVG_URL and SVGZ_URL and used a http header sniffer to watch what's getting served up and the urls associated with MapViewer SVG are definitely getting served up with that wrong Content-Type.
Our front end is an Oracle APEX environment were we use APEX's SVG charting on the same page and they are getting served up with the correct Content-Type and display correctly, which is nice cause I can watch the header difference's side by side, and we know the mapping itself is working right because we can get image files back
Is there a sever config file or something like the httpd.conf for apache that needs to be set?
Thanks for any help or insight
Carl

Enable http header logging on glassfish 3.1

Hi,
On GF 3.1, to enable http header logging to server.log, I've tried setting the following JVM options:
-Dcom.sun.grizzly.enableSnoop=true
-Dcom.sun.enterprise.web.connector.grizzly.enableSnoop=true
I have also tried modifying the domain.xml by adding snoop-enable=true attribute to the element:
<network-config><transports><transport name="tcp" enable-snoop="true"
But neither worked. Any help would be appreciated

oops, wrong version, try this instead:
asadmin set configs.config.server-config.network-config.transports.transport.tcp.enable-snoop=true
asadmin set configs.config.server-config.http-service.access-logging-enabled=true

How do I set the Http Header POST URL in SAAJ?

Hi ,
I am a newbie in the field of web services. I was trying to create a SOAP request with Http Header POST information having a POST url like
the following:
POST /OMASTI.xml HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="eladeladeladeladeladeladeladeladelad"; type=text/xml; start=11814460
Content-Length: 54596
Host: unspecified
SOAPAction: ""
to that effect I did the following in the SAAJ client:
MimeHeaders md = message.getMimeHeaders();
md.setHeader("SOAPAction" ,"\"\"");
md.setHeader("POST" ,"/OMASTI.xml");
However what I got was :
POST / HTTP/1.1
Accept: text/xml, text/html, image/gif, image/jpeg, *; q=.2, */*; q=.2
SOAPAction: ""
POST: /OMASTI.xml
Content-Type: multipart/related; type="text/xml"; boundary="----=_Part_2_32124414.1153146262750"
Content-Length: 3352
Cache-Control: no-cache
Pragma: no-cache
User-Agent: Java/1.5.0_07
Host: www.google.com
Connection: keep-alive
I have two POSTs in the header. How do I fix it? Please Help ASAP.
Regards,
Zeus

Hi,
Please forgive my ignorance. I did the same as you said. and then checked the Http request being sent out using ethreal software... it was the same as I had told earlier. Is only POST supported by the connection object? And the does the URL that comes in the Mime header as POST refer to the URL to which the request was sent? what I mean is that if the mime header says
POST /OMASTI.xml HTTP 1.1, does it mean that the URL that was passed to the connection object was "/OMASTI.xml" ? I had given the url as http://www.google.com to test the request being sent.. I only have a sample SOAP request which shows a HTTP header with the post url as I said before. I need to create a SOAP request with the same sort of Http header and the body needs to follow a certain OMA-STI protocol. My experience in the SOAP domain is almost nil. So please enlighten me.
Thanks in advance,
zeus

HTTP 500 Error while using XML HTTP Port for idoc

Hi,
I am trying to send CRM idocs via XML Http instead of usual t-rfc.
After standard idoc - pi configs i get the below error.
transferring the IDoc by HTTP, the return code with the message '500Error during parsing of SOAP header' has occurred.
In BD87 I get the below error.
The target address was: http://yyyyyy.XXX.local:800X/sap/xi/engine?type=entry
I get the http 500 error as:-
Check whether the IDoc can be sent again.
It is unfortunately not possible to determine automatically whether the IDoc has in fact arrived in the target system and the error occurred afterwards
Any idea on how to trouble shoot or resolve this.
Regards,
Anirban

Hi Anirban,
Follow the below links for troubleshooting.
Troubleshooting File-to-IDOC Scenario in XI.
The specified item was not found.
Regards,
Leela

OSB Http Transport Custom Authenticatiion (X509 in Http header)

Hello!
I'm trying to solve this case. We have F5 Load balancer that terminates SSL Connections From client to the OSB. When terminating the SSL, the LB adds the clients certificate into headers of the Http request going to OSB.
OSb proxy service is configured to use custom authentication with token type X509 (only choice in the OSB console).
What happens when I send the request to OSB, is that I get http code 401 (unauthorized) this error on server log:
####<Sep 27, 2011 3:08:05 PM EEST> <Error> <WliSbTransports> <appserver02> <MANSERV02> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<anonymous>> <> <> <1317125285598> <BEA-381327> <Transport-level custom token identity assertion failed
java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.String cannot be cast to [Ljava.security.cert.X509Certificate;
The HTTP header sent to OSB is in the messages below.
It has also been wihotu the BEGIN CERTIFICATE and END CERTIFICATE lines with same results.
Can somebody help me in:
a) Should the certificate be sent in what form from LB to OSB.
b) How should the OSB/WLS be configured for this to work?
OSB version is 10.3.1.
Request to the server is:
POST /prjTemplateService/ProxyServices/psvcHelloWolrdWSSSLInterface HTTP/1.1
Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate
Content-Type: text/xml;charset=UTF-8
SOAPAction: "urn:#HelloWorldOperation"
User-Agent: Jakarta Commons-HttpClient/3.1
Host: <ip_here>
Content-Length: 459
SSLClientCertStatus: ok
SSLClientCertb64: -----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----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-----END CERTIFICATE-----
SSLClientCertSN: 4d:ac:00:17
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:urn="urn:Hello:client">
<soapenv:Body>
<urn:HelloWorldRequest>
<urn:FirstName>Jolly</urn:FirstName>
<urn:Surname>Roger</urn:Surname>
</urn:HelloWorldRequest>
</soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>
Response from OSB:
HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized
Connection: close
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 08:32:33 GMT
Content-Length: 1518
Content-Type: text/html
X-Powered-By: Servlet/2.5 JSP/2.1
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Draft//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Error 401--Unauthorized</TITLE>
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="WebLogic Server">
</HEAD>
<BODY bgcolor="white">
<FONT FACE=Helvetica><BR CLEAR=all>
<TABLE border=0 cellspacing=5><TR><TD><BR CLEAR=all>
<FONT FACE="Helvetica" COLOR="black" SIZE="3"><H2>Error 401--Unauthorized</H2>
</FONT></TD></TR>
</TABLE>
<TABLE border=0 width=100% cellpadding=10><TR><TD VALIGN=top WIDTH=100% BGCOLOR=white><FONT FACE="Courier New"><FONT FACE="Helvetica" SIZE="3"><H3>From RFC 2068 <i>Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1</i>:</H3>
</FONT><FONT FACE="Helvetica" SIZE="3"><H4>10.4.2 401 Unauthorized</H4>
</FONT><P><FONT FACE="Courier New">The request requires user authentication. The response MUST include a WWW-Authenticate header field (section 14.46) containing a challenge applicable to the requested resource. The client MAY repeat the request with a suitable Authorization header field (section 14.8). If the request already included Authorization credentials, then the 401 response indicates that authorization has been refused for those credentials. If the 401 response contains the same challenge as the prior response, and the user agent has already attempted authentication at least once, then the user SHOULD be presented the entity that was given in the response, since that entity MAY include relevant diagnostic information. HTTP access authentication is explained in section 11.</FONT></P>
</FONT></TD></TR>
</TABLE>
</BODY>
</HTML>

>
by using Client Cert authentication I have to set HTTPS required to true.
>
Yes.
>
When I try to invoke this service with http request, it redirects to https service.
This actually just trashes the entire idea of terminating SSL in the load balancer.
>
Not necessarily. Although direct HTTP request to WebLogic is redirected to HTTPS enabled port, you can still use this settings with WebLogic plugin. I'm not aware of your deployment, but I use Apache plugin for WebLogic, terminate SSL on Apache and I'm still able to send requests authenticated by certificate from client through HTTPS.
I don't know about F5, but I guess there should be similar feature as well.
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12840_01/wls/docs103/cluster/load_balancing.html

ESB requires "SOAPAction" to be set in HTTP header?

I'm trying to insert an ESB flow between an existing web service and client. The service and client were previously built with Apache Axis.
By generating an appropriate WSDL (doc/wrapped rather than Axis' default RPC style) for the existing service, I'm able to connect the ESB to the service.
The problem is that the existing client (built using Axis) sets the SOAPAction in the HTTP header to empty (SOAPAction: ""), and the ESB appears to require this to be set to the desired operation. If this is a hard requirement, then I can't directly connect the existing client to the ESB flow.
So, the question is whether it's possible to have the ESB relax the requirement for the SOAPAction header. And if so, how?
If I can't get the ESB to accept SOAP requests with an empty SOAPAction, then I'll have to create a custom adapter or insert an additional proxy layer (yuk). Anyone else have any suggestions?

This is all done automatically by FB.
Just to try something out I just now made a simple app with a label only and tried to upload to Google... FAILED!!!!
"Market requires versionCode to be set to a positive 32-bit integer in AndroidManifest.xml"
LOL, FB can't even create this. :-/
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<application xmlns="http://ns.adobe.com/air/application/3.1">

Message was edited by: KesherMedia.Com

Accept language in Http Header of Aqualogic portlet.

Hi, we have developed one web page using ASP.Net and hosted in the Aqualogic portlet server, when ever we access that page from different location/browser, we are getting "en-us" as accept language in the Http header variable of Request object, but it should change based on the location and browser.
Please let us know,do we have to modify any settings in the aqualogic portal?
Note: We are getting different accept language from the same code when hosted on the web server/local(Without Aqualogic).
Thanks in Advance.
Edited by: 993251 on Mar 12, 2013 11:08 PM

>
by using Client Cert authentication I have to set HTTPS required to true.
>
Yes.
>
When I try to invoke this service with http request, it redirects to https service.
This actually just trashes the entire idea of terminating SSL in the load balancer.
>
Not necessarily. Although direct HTTP request to WebLogic is redirected to HTTPS enabled port, you can still use this settings with WebLogic plugin. I'm not aware of your deployment, but I use Apache plugin for WebLogic, terminate SSL on Apache and I'm still able to send requests authenticated by certificate from client through HTTPS.
I don't know about F5, but I guess there should be similar feature as well.
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12840_01/wls/docs103/cluster/load_balancing.html

Authorization tag in http header

While making an end point call using the webservice control the authorization tag is getting added to the http header. This is causing 401 errors when going over SSL . We are adding the credentials as part of the SOAP header.
Why / How is the Authorization Basic tag getting created? Also how can we eliminate it?
****************** tcpmon output shown below
POST /DMIntegration/ContentService HTTP/1.1
User-Agent: BEA WebLogic Server 10.3.0.0
Content-Type: text/xml; charset=utf-8
SOAPAction: ""
Authorization: Basic U334567dGFsVXNlcjpQb3J0YW1234==
Host: 10.157.44.155:7080
Accept: text/html, image/gif, image/jpeg, */*; q=.2
Connection: Keep-Alive
Content-Length: 1834
Thanks,
- Shankar

Hi,
The Authorization group can be created as follows
Transaction SE54 >Select 'Authorization Groups'>Create/Change-->New Entries.
Now the authorization group created can be assigned to your table.
Goto transaction 'SE56' and select authorization group radio button and create your authorization group.
In general different users will be given different authorizations based on their role in the orgn.
We create ROLES and assign the Authorization and TCODES for that role, so only that user can have access to those T Codes.
USe SUIM and SU21 T codes for this.
USE
Much of the data in an R/3 system has to be protected so that unauthorized users cannot access it. Therefore the appropriate authorization is required before a user can carry out certain actions in the system. When you log on to the R/3 system, the system checks in the user master record to see which transactions you are authorized to use. An authorization check is implemented.check Su22 and SU24u will get list of objects
Hope clear to you.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

XML HTTP Header modify

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for