0EMPLOYEE master data issue

Hi All,
We are extracting the data from HR to BI info object 0EMPLOYEE. The data source name 0EMPLOYEE_ATTR. While extracting the data from HR to BI the data is coming up to PSA and the data is not updating to info object (some of the employees around 2000 attributes are missing). Please help on this
Regards,
Ravi

Hi Ravi,
0EMPLOYEE_ATTR is 3.x Datasource. How are you loading the data to 0EMPLOYEE? Using 3.x flow or using BI7(i.e transformation & dtp). Make sure you have loaded the data correctly to 0EMPLOYEE from PSA. If you are loading though 3.X flow, you will not be able to see the request in 0EMPLOYEE Manage screen.
If data is loaded, then you will have to check if there are any routines in the transfer rules/transformation which might be filtering the data. You will also need to check DTP if anything is filtered out in Filter. Also as suggested it is possible that PSA might have duplicate records where as one one Key record will be loaded to 0EMPLOYEE.
Also please make sure that you have activated 0EMPLOYEE data by using change run.
Regards,
Pavan

Similar Messages

  • Error in 0EMPLOYEE Master Data Load Issue

    Hi,
    We have 0EMPLOYEE Master Data. Due to our new development changes ralted to 0EMPLOYEE, we have scheduled 2 new info packages with Personnel number range. While creation of infopackages, we forget to main time interval from 01.01.1900 to 31.12.9999. Instead of this, the default range was selected as 24.04.2009 to 31.12.9999. Because of this selection in InfoPackage, the Employee Master Data Valid from date was changed to 24.04.2009 for all the employees in the master data after the data load.
    Even after i change this selection properly and loading the data also, its not correcting with correct valid from dates.
    Can you please advice, how can we fix this issue ASAP as its a production issue?
    Thanks!
    Best regards,
    Venkata

    > Even after i change this selection properly and loading the data also, its not correcting with correct valid from dates.
    May be for this you have the ONLY option to delete 0Employee master data and reload it again. For this you need to delete dependent transaction data also.
    Cheers,
    Sree

  • Master data Issue  ---   materials have unassigned or # values ...!!

    Hello Experts,
    I am facing an issue that the Customer Data is missing in a BEx Report.
    Data Flow is   2LIS_13_VDITM  --> DSO1 --> Merging DSO -->  Cube --> Multiprovider --> Bex Report.
    Exact issue is Customers in the Bex Report  has unassigned to Sales Office, Sales Group, Sales District.
    The only reason a customer should show up under u201Cunassignedu201D or u201C#u201D is if itu2019s improperly set up in the system.
    customers are assigned with two values. one which has data and the other which has unassigned value.
    I wanted to know, how do i check if the matierials are valid to have unassigned Values ?
    Checked the Merging DSO and saw that there are actually values assigned values for the affected matierials.
    After that checked the Cube data values are displayed except the Master Data values.
    I guess..its completely related to Master data. I would like to know how can i resolve this issue.
    Please reply me if you face this kind of master data issue in your expeiriance.
    Thanks,
    SN.

    Hi,
    Are Sales Office, Sales Group, Sales District are attributes of Customer?
    In case they are, then the customers will be unassigned to Sales Office, Sales Group, Sales District in case the data for these attributes is loaded to the customer attributes.
    and also check if the customer characteristic is properly assigned in the multiprovider.
    Check if it helps.
    Regards,
    Joe

  • To enhance 0EMPLOYEE master data attributes, need to delete and load again?

    Dear Support,
    In order to meet business intelligence demands, I had three more attributes (region, time rate and worksite) to 0employee time dependent characteristic.  The datasource to load 0employee attributes and its structure were enhanced to fill the new fields.
    After first load, 0employee master data could not be activated. So I deleted 0employee master data, what I couldnu2019t do without deleting its data from transactional HR infocubes. I deleted transactional data and afterwards master data. I load it again and activated, with no errors this time.
    This occured in development system.
    Changes are about to go to production environment and deleting almost all transactional RH area infocubes and 0employee master data is something that we all want to avoid.
    I am asking if there is a workaround in order to solve this without doing the stated time and resources consuming task.
    Thanks in advance for your help,
    Best Regards,
    André Oliveira

    Hi Andre,
    You should be able to do a full load to achieve this. No need to delete the data. If there are corrupt data in BI with overlapping time periods, fix it by maintaining the master data. If corrupt data comes from source fix it in PSA.
    Also you can specify to load the data for a time range only which might be easier than to load all history.
    good luck,
    vijay

  • Loading 0employee master data (full load)

    0employee master data has been loaded several times in BW...it looks like sometimes the load runs and creates a new record eventhough the data hasn't changed. guessing this is because of the time parameter entered on the (infopackage) update screen?? How do we remove the duplicate records?
    Thanks for your help!
    Chuck

    because its time dependent master data....check table PA0000....
    hope it helps...when you are creating your queries you have to give them a key data...an employee might have worked in a particular department during a certain time and another department during another time...
    begin date and end date are very important here...
    Hope it helps

  • QM Master data issue

    Dear all,
    We want to begin using the INPUT PROCEDURE addin in our QM module, we already have customized this addin but now we are facing a master data issue, that is, when we update the inspection characteristics master data, the actual inspection plans do not take this changes into account.
    My first question is: Is there any way to force the actual inspection plans to be updated with the actual inspections characteristics parameters ?
    In particular, we want to force the option 'Input processing' in the control indicator, and the Input processing value in the Quant. Data.
    Alternatively, is there any way to mass update this informations directly at inspection plan-characteristic level ?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hello,
    I followed this steps, actually already had the 'Replace master insp. characteristics' indicator set, however, when I do changes in a MIC, either creating a new version or not, the system does not show the list of where used plans.
    Maybe is there further customizations ?
    Thanks a lot!

  • Master Data issue from external system to BW

    Hi,
    BW Version: BI 7.0
    Source System : Oracle D/B
    The Data will be processed by some external application and the processes Data will be stored in tables in Oracle D/B.I am extracting Data from Oracle Tables to BW.
    The issue i had is in the external application for example if we created a new Location ID,The new location ID won't be avaliable in Oracle untill i use it (assing it to any employee)
    Once i assign it to employee then the Location ID and Description will be avaliable transaction tables.
    Then in this cas how can i load master data to location ID in BW.
    or
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Simply create a Location ID InfoObject that will work as Master Data. Then create a datasource for the extraction of the Location ID Master Data (at least for the attributes, and probably for the texts as well).
    You can then schedule an update of this data everynight via process chains.
    All this will update the desired information independently from the transaction data.
    Hope it helps,

  • Master Data Issue

    Hi BW Guru's,
    I have an issue with standard master data data source in BW system.  In R/3 side they have done modifications for the existing strucuture and based on the modification they want to see the values but where as when we load data the values are not getting (Daily we will load master data through process chains).  And the strange thing is when we do full load manually with the same info source the values will be uploaded.  and the users can see the values.
    The data source is 0CUST_COMPC and the modification that they have done remapping of Customers to the salesrep and this will show an impact on the Collector.In BW we are facing the following issue that the change of collector is not updated in BW
    why is this field not considered into the deltas....?
    Is there any OSS note which support to pull this field in to BW please suggest me.
    can any one help me on this issue.  Your help will be appreciated in advance.
    Thanks,
    Ganni

    Dear Venkat,
    Once you have Added the New Fields in BW Side, You have to Reinitialize the Delta .
    And I dont think the master data would be very frequently changing as the data comes from KNB1 , so may be this is the result the delta is not coming for those fields, But You have Reinit again to get deltas working properly after enhancing KNB1.
    Hope it helps..
    Thanks,
    Krish

  • Time dependant Master data issue

    Dear Experts,
    I have a master data object 0DF_HRPOSTN which is time denpendant in that a position will have validity dates like when its first loaded as below
    BI
    Pos1001  01.01.1000 to 31.12.9999
    later from source system this position validity might be ended like
    pos1001 01.01.1000 to 31.12.2010
    the problem is the infoobject is having key as position and end to date now even though this position validity is changed to 31.12.2010 BI is still holding the reocrd 31.12.9999 which is creating lot of issues, what can i do to rectify.
    Thanks and Regards
    Neel

    Hi Diogo & Mark,
    Actually the issue is see for example
    John--Manager-- 01.01.1000 to 31.12.2009
    John----
    Sr Manger -
    01.04.2009 to 31.12.2010
    John -
    Sr Manager-----01.04.2010 to 31.12.9999
    Here John is no more in company so his position is stopped but as per standard BI now also has the thrid record
    So when i want to select all the people who are active then i will get even john positions becuase condition will be like End to date
    Greater than system date
    I think that when we want to stop a positions validity then its should not get another entry ending to 31.12.9999.
    So kindly help me selecting right records in my transformation and reports
    Thanks and Regads
    Neel

  • Incorrect Master Data Issue

    Hi
    We have incorrect master data in 0CUST_SALE object. It is due to some of the enhancements done in the Update/transfer rules. Because of this, we have extra records in BW. Like 110 record for actual 10 records. We are unable to delete the master data as there are transaction data already present.
    We have identified the root cause, why this has happened. Has anyone faced similar issue before and how is it being fixed?
    Jith

    Hi Jith:
    Why do you think the master data is incorrect because there are 110 records for 10 master data records?
    0CUST_SALES is Customer compounded to Sales Area. For each customer sales area combination there can be a record in that table.
    Sales Area is Division / Dist Channel / Sales Org. The number of combinations of customer compounded to sales area can be many for a single customer as there can be many divisions many dist channels and many sales orgs.
    Are you sure the master data is incorrect? I don't know of a way to delete master data without deleting transactional data that uses that master data.
    Only thing you can do is to overwrite those master data records.
    Hope you find a solution.
    Good Luck.
    MP.

  • 0HRPOSITION master data issue when position is delimited

    We are live with BW HR application and having issue with 0HRPOSITION master data. We are extracting data from SAP using 0HRPOSITION_ATTR datasource. I noticed that data is not maintained correctly in master data tables in BW and giving us incorrect results in reporting. Consider below mentioned scenario:
    Position A created as vacant on 05/01/2008 with start date (BEGDA/ Valid from) as 05/01/2008 and End date (ENDDA/ Valid to) as 12/31/9999 and is vacant. Below mentioned entry is shown under maintain master data for 0HRPOSITION in BW:
    Position Valid To Valid From Position Vacant
    A 04/30/2008 01/01/1000
    A 12/31/9999 05/01/2008 X
    Position A is now delimited on 09/15/2009 as its no more required. In SAP, position has record only from 04/01/2006 till 09/20/2009 as vacant. When record is extracted in BW, it creates below mentioned entry in master data table.
    Position           Valid To     Valid From     Position Vacant Indicator
        A             04/34/2008    01/01/1000
        A             09/20/2009    05/01/2008                  X
        A             12/31/9999    09/21/2009                  X
    Entry 09/21/2009 - 12/31/9999 is incorrect as position does not exist for this duration and it is neither vacant nor occupied. If we report on 0HRPOSTION with key date as 09/30/2009 , it shows position A as vacant though position no longer exists.
    Has anyone come across this situation. any help is greatly appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Prithi Iyengar
    Edited by: Prithi Iyengar on Dec 23, 2009 3:07 PM

    Hi,
    We do a full update data load for 0HRPOSITION attribute as well as text on daily basis. Attribute change run are scheduled in the process chains. No issues with that..
    In the report, we have the display option of 0HRPOSITION as key and text. Now what is happening is that for most of the positions the text is displayed perfectly but only for those positions which were delimited the text description is not displayed in the report. It is displayed as blank. For eg consider positions A, B, C and D. Say A, B are active positions and C & D have been delimited at a cerain period of time.
    *Master data table is:*
    Position --  Valid_from --  Valid_to  -- Description -- Org. Unit
    A         --  01.05.2008 -- 31.12.9999-- Text1   --- A001
    B         --  01.06.2009 -- 31.12.9999 -- Text2   --- B001
    C         --  01.06.2009 -- 01.08.2009 --- Text3 --- C001
    C         --  02.08.2009 -- 31.12.9999 --  ........   --- ....
    D         --  01.07.2008 -- 15.06.2009 -- Text 4  ---  D001
    D         --  16.06.2009 -- 31.12.9999 --  ........  --- ...
    In report, say i run for date 01.05.2009 to 31.05.2009,
    Position -
    No. of positions
    Key -
    Text  
    A     |  --- Text1  | 1
    B     |  --- Text 2 | 1
    C     |  --- .......... | 1
    D     |  --- .......... |1
    If you notice, the description is maintained for positions C & D in time period 01.05 to 31.05 but the text is not displayed in the report.
    Thanks,
    Edited by: Prithi Iyengar on Dec 23, 2009 5:30 PM

  • General Master data issue

    Hello Good People!
    How can I address this issue..................... The general master data of the G/L account  is not maintained in the chart of accounts INT. ...... Please highlight steps to address this issue
    Thanks
    Note : Please post question clearly along with error message to enable quick responses,
    also search forum before posting.
    Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on Aug 19, 2011 10:04 AM

    Hi,
    What I understood here G/L account is not created for chart of account INT.
    So create G/L account through T-code FS00 for your company code  and make necessary assignment in OBYC for the G/L account.
    Regards

  • MASTER DATA ISSUE , VENDOR MASTER

    Hi,
    I have a problem in vendor master. first i will explain the scenario.
    we have two company codes one is in America, and the other is Europe.we have two purchase organisations called X (meant for america)& Y( meant for Europe) . X and Y has two plants called AMO1 (meant for america), US33. ( meant for Europe). purchase org X is assigned to  plant america (us33),purchase org Y is assigned to Europe(am01).we are using centralized POrg. so we asshined to POrg to Plant.
    Now when i am creating vendor master data. system is accepting for compay code Europe for Purchase org X( america). How it will happen?. It should propose X only.but i created vendor master record for cross combination of different assignment.Folks can you please suggest solution. SAP SHOULD THROW ERROR MESSAGE IF I CREATE THIS TYPE OF COMBINATION.But that doesn't happen.waiting for reply

    Hi Vamsi,
    Normarmally we can map the procurement structure by three ways.
    1. Corporate Specific Enterprise Structure : where CC will assigned to Plant and Plant is assigned to POrg., In this case CC & POrg. assignment dont happen i.e.
    a.  POrg. can procure the material for any CC.
    b. Vendor master can be created with any combination like CC ( USA) & POrg. (Europe) or CC ( Europe) & POrg. (USA), here system will not throw any warning/Error message.
    and I am sure Vamsi your client is using Corporate Specific Enterprise Structure mapping.
    2. Company Specific Enterprise Structure : Here CC will assigned to Plant and Plant is assigned to POrg., In this case CC & POrg. assignment does happen i.e.
    a.  POrg. can procure the material for only specific CC assigned with specific POrg..
    b. Vendor master cannt be created with any combination like CC ( USA) & POrg. (Europe) or CC ( Europe) & POrg. (USA), if you will try then system will throw any warning/Error message.
    i.e. .vendor Master can be created only CC ( USA) & POrg. (USA) or CC ( Europe) & POrg. (Europe) combination.
    3. Plant Specific Enterprise Structure : Here assignment will be same as Company Specific Enterprise Structure.
    POrg. can procure the material for only specific plant ssigned with specific POrg..
    Hope this piece of information will help you to resolve your issue.please let me know if you want any more clarification.
    manoj singh

  • Cost Center Master Data Issue for Hierarchy

    Hi,
    We are building a hierarchy on Cost Center and realized that the way Master data on Cost Center is stored in SPM it's getting concatenated with Controlling Area. So CC 1234 becomes 1234_010 where 010 is a controlling area.
    While we understand a need to make CC unique across several controlling area, it's impacting Hierarchy. In Hierarchy we only upload CC and not CA.
    Do you recommend to do concatenation of CC & CA for Hierarchy as well so that it matches with Master? Or is there any other recommended way to go ?
    Regards

    Hi Rohit,
    That was helpful. We will certainly take concatenation route.
    However in Invoice Extract File we do get CC & CA separately in XARCOCTR & XSACOARR fields respectively.
    When you say that this is concatenated even on Transaction Data are you talking about data AFTER it is loaded into SPM ? Also when data is sent out to DSE will it have CC & CA concatenated ?
    Regards,

  • 0CRM_MKTELM Master data issue

    Hi Friends,
    We are extracting 0CRM_MKTELM master data from CRM system to BW. After both the master data load & attribute change run activies completed through process chian, no data is available in master data in M verson. After this PC load no data updations from CRM system. But after few hours some data is getting updated in to the master with M version.
    Is there any way to getting the master data updation from CRM? or any other way by which this is possible? Because users have no authrizations in BW to post the Master data directely.
    Thanks in advance.
    regards,
    Raghu.
    Edited by: TRAGHU on Feb 9, 2012 11:13 AM

    required your support on this

Maybe you are looking for

  • AFRU table data - taking long time to access

    Hi, In my report i am accessing the afru table, but it takes a lot of time. what should i do ? how can i archive the data from this table ? Regards,

  • Any Suggestions for this Table??

    Iam facing problem while creating a report. I have to generate a report which is having dynamic columns and rows For Eg. In this report I have total 365 columns (M1 to M365)depends up on the user he can generate the report for 2 or 3 or may be 365 co

  • Nikon d7000 support

    I wonder if Camera Raw will support the new Nikon d7000 camera sometime soon? How does one find out? I just got one and always shoot in RAW mode but now I can't open any photos unless I install Nikon's software which I will not do.

  • ISRG2 free trial license

    how to activate the free trial SEC license or Data license over the ISRG2 routers?

  • Why does it take so long to edit diagrams I've created on Mac Pages using brand new Macbook pro?

    I'm using my macbook pro retina 13 to create diagrams and reports in Mac Pages. I have 8 gigs of RAM and I just bought it, so it can't be out of space on the hard drive already. The diagrams take forever to load or edit or adjust. Any ideas or sugges