0PM_OM_OPA_2 needs too much time

hi, experts,
I started a DELTA info-package to 0PM_OM_OPA_2 and the program in r/3 obviosly needs too much time. So in BW I get an error message and the process is interrupted. When I check the extractor via RSA3 every thing is ok, besides the long time for the extraction. Any idea, how can I solve the problem?
best regards
neven

hi, Frank,
thanks for your tip. But, how about the SETUP-Tables? Do I need to delete and refill some SETUP-Tables for this data source ( Transactions LBWG and OLIIBW )?
best regards
neven

Similar Messages

Weblogic 8.1 sp2 app deployments need too much time

Hi,
I've just installed the new Weblogic 8.1 sp2 version.
With this new version, I've got a very small application, and when I start Weblogic
or redeploy that application, it lasts a lot (2 minutes) when it
just needed a few seconds with Weblogic 8.1 sp1.
I've posted my weblogic.xml. Is there any option I should consider related to
this? Do you need any extra information?
Thanks,
[weblogic.xml]

Hi,
it's me again.
I've been trying many things, and none worked.
I've tried removing all EJBs from the app. I've tried changing from devolpment
to production mode, and it even went slower. I've tried removing pool from the
server. I've tried changing JVM parameters in the startWeblogic.cmd, something
like this:
-hotspot -ms128m -mx128m -XX:MaxPermSize=128m -XX:NewSize=64m
and even with greater values.
I've tried changing values in weblogic.xml for jsp precompile or debug.....
Nothing worked. My app (it's incredibly simple!!) takes over one minute and a
half to be deployed. It uses struts 1.1 and my weblogic is installed on W2k Prof.
sp4.
I never came across this problem with Weblogic 8.1 sp1 and prior versions.
Any idea??? My development is becoming as slow as a turtle :.-(
"Ignacio Sanchez" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
Hi,
I've just installed the new Weblogic 8.1 sp2 version.
With this new version, I've got a very small application, and when I
start Weblogic
or redeploy that application, it lasts a lot (2 minutes) when it
just needed a few seconds with Weblogic 8.1 sp1.
I've posted my weblogic.xml. Is there any option I should consider related
to
this? Do you need any extra information?
Thanks,

Combining clob taking too much time - need help

Hello,
I want to append clob values into another clob value like
declare
v_temp clob;
v_c1_temp clob;
cursor c1 as select clob_data from t;
-- here t table contains clob_data column holding clob data
-- t table have more then 1500 rows
begin
v_temp := '';
open c1 into v_c1_temp;
loop
v_temp := v_temp + v_c1_temp; --------- combining clob (concat may be used)
end loop;
close(c1);
end;
above part also repeats in outer loop (not shown here)
my problem is :- it is taking too much time - you dont believe 90% more time due to that concatenation.
is it any smart way to do same thing?
It will be very helpful to me.

Hi ,
You should also always try and have the latest BI content patch installed but I don't think this is the problem. It seems that there
are alot of objects to collect. Under 'grouping' you can select the option 'only necessary objects', please check if you can
use this option to install the objects that you need from content.
Best Regards,
Des.

HT201328 Hello, I needed to do a hard reset on my iPhone 3GS and it's taking me too much time. It's taking almost 12 hours by now!!!! I did it by going to "Settings, General, Reset, Erase All Content and Settings", confirm it and then the iPhone turns

Hello,
I needed to do a hard reset on my iPhone 3GS and it's taking me too much time. It's taking almost 3 hours by now!!!!
I did it by going to "Settings, General, Reset, Erase All Content and Settings", confirm it and then the iPhone turns off, gets the screen black with only the animated circle going on. And it's been there since then.
Is this a symptom of something bad? Should I do the hard reset by another way?

Hello Ali Syed,
It sounds like your phone is stuck at the spinning gear icon on the screen after Erasing all Content and Settings on your device. I would start by resetting the device with this process:
To reset, press and hold both the Sleep/Wake and Home buttons for at least 10 seconds, until you see the Apple logo.
From: Turn your iOS device off and on (restart) and reset
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1430
If the issue persists you may need to put the phone into recovery mode, and then restore it with iTunes as a new device:
If you can't update or restore your iOS device
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1808
Thank you for using Apple Support Communities.
Take care,
Sterling

White MacBook takes too much time to boot up

Hi there.
I got the topcase(keyboard) of my MacBook repaired. (White MacBook 2006) and after that it takes nearly 7 up to 10 seconds after pressing the power button that I first see apple logo and it boots up.
I'm not sure but seems like that detecting the hardwares take too much time .
any solution?
PS: I'm running Snow Leopard(10.6.2)

macbig wrote:
OK, 32 seconds is not good. I don't think it has anything to do with a keyboard repair. You need to try a little maintenance: Reset Pram - http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=2238
Repair Permissions - http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1452
Run Disk Utility >applications>utilities>disk utilities>verify disk
How much free space do you have on your HD: Right click on HD icon and select "get info" in the drop down menu (if you don't have right click capabilities, highlight your HD icon, go file in the Apple menu, and select "get info" in the drop down menu. Let us know your results.
Yes PRAM was the the problem, I've already tried it from this thread http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2303507&tstart=0
by the way thank you .

Taking too much time incollecting in business content activation

Hi all,
I am collecting business content object for activation. I have selected 0fiAA_cha object,while cllecting in the activation but it is taking too much time and then it asks for source
system authorisation and then throws error maximum run time exceded. i have selected data flow before there.
What can be the reason for it.
Please help..

Hi ,
You should also always try and have the latest BI content patch installed but I don't think this is the problem. It seems that there
are alot of objects to collect. Under 'grouping' you can select the option 'only necessary objects', please check if you can
use this option to install the objects that you need from content.
Best Regards,
Des.

PRS600 ereader taking too much time to load all the books

Whenever I open My PRS600 from complete shutdown it takes too much time to load all the files which are present in Memory card. Is anyone else facing same issue?

Hello,
Recently, I have been having some serious issues when it comes to my Sony PRS-600. I am running on a Windows 7 64-bit, and an updated Reader Library 3.3
The issue comes when transferring books to the e-reader from the library, and from the e-reader to a collection. The problem is that the software becomes intolerably slow while it's processing the command. The Reader Library software window grays out, displays (Not Working) and if clicked on it, shades to a white color and displays either "cancel operation" or "wait until program responds". If I do close the operation, it appears as if the e-reader doesn't follow the operation and still displays "Do not disconnect". Since I do not see any other way to disconnect (other than the eject option), I remove the USB plug which causes a bit more issues with the reader (such as removing all of my collections, for example!).
But anyway, that's not the main issue here. The main issue is that the book transferring is really slow. I need to wait a couple of minutes (or even more) just for the software to process. Moving just 1 MB of data requires so much time as if it's 1 GB. Sometimes it's random and does it fast, and sometimes the application is better not to be dealt with at all while it's processing the command. If I would inspect My Computer, the simple loading of the e-reader storage icons and information would make the Windows Explorer to "crash" (e.g, close all windows and then reopen them). It just happens that in all randomness even the creation of a collection makes the software slow.
So to recap: the reader software is slow when adding and moving books.
I hope someone will help me resolve this annoyance.
Thank you,
KQ

ROWSET taking too much time to populate

Hi ,
I have a problem with ROWSET.
I have a table with 6 columns and approximately more than 200 records.
I reterive them in a ResultSet and resultset gets populated.
But when I populate Rowset with that ResultSet then it hangs for atleast 1 minuate and then it comes back to its original state.
Can anyone have the idea why it happens....?
Is there any issue with the Rowset ?
Why it takes too much time to populate the rowset..?
CachedRowSetImpl crs = new CachedRowSetImpl();
Statement stmt = con.createStatement(ResultSet.TYPE_SCROLL_SENSITIVE, ResultSet.CONCUR_READ_ONLY);
ResultSet result = stmt.executeQuery(sql); // Here we have 250 records in ResultSet
crs.populate(result); // This is the problem. This line takes atleast 1min to executeThanks
Tariq

I think this Java Forum is not the right FORUM for
me.....I think you are right. This is NOT the FORUM for YOU.
I think u (So Called GURUS) all need to work on JDBC
more and on large application so that u should be
able to solve complex problem.
THIS is PROBABLY not the BEST way for YOU to get HELP
I hope u will work on my suggestion...
I HOPE you CHOKE on a TURNIP and DIE.
Thx
Muhammad TariqFuck you.
On your way out please make sure to stop in at Google and search for "Forums for arrogant fuckwits". That's the kind of resource you need.

Code taking too much time to output

Following code is taking too much time to execute . (some time giving Time_out )
ind = sy-tabix.
    SELECT SINGLE * FROM mseg INTO mseg
       WHERE bwart = '102' AND
             lfbnr = itab-mblnr AND
             ebeln = itab-ebeln AND
             ebelp = itab-ebelp.
    IF sy-subrc = 0.
      DELETE itab INDEX ind.
      CONTINUE.
Is there any other way to write this code to reduce the output time.
Thanks

Hi,
I think you are executing this code in a loop which is causing the problem. The rule is "Never put SELECT statements inside a loop".
Try to rewrite the code as follows:
* Outside the loop
SELECT *
from MSEG
into table lt_mseg
for all entries in itab
where bwart = '102' AND
lfbnr = itab-mblnr AND
ebeln = itab-ebeln AND
ebelp = itab-ebelp.
Then inside the loop, do a READ on the internal table
Loop at itab.
read table lt_mseg with key bwart = '102'. "plus other conditions
if sy-subrc ne 0.
delete itab. "index is automatically determined here from SY-TABIX
endif.
endloop.
I think this should optimise performance. You can check your code's performance using SE30 or ST05.
Hope this helps! Please revert if you need anything else!!
Cheers,
Shailesh.
Always provide feedback for helpful answers!

T400 takes too much time to start or shutdown

I got a lenovo thinkpad T400, everything seems to be fine but lot of issues.
1. It takes too much time to start or shutdown (I purchased 2GB turbo memory along with the system for $50, but no use).My system is slower than 2.2 GHz(mine is 2.53GHz)
2.Fingerprint Reader: When I tried to login using my fingerprint reader it gives an error message "computer is locked only authorized user can login", when we need to type in Password every time, why Finger print reader is used ?
Connectivity: All laptops around can see all networks but not mine, my system couldn't see any networks. Why ?
4. System strucks suddenly staying irresponsible for while.!!!!!!!!!!!
When I tried to talk to CSR, they instructed to format my system using the CD's which they are going to send.When I tried to do so; an error message occurred when I inserted second CD ,that "please insert suitable/matchable(don't remember exactly) CD.
I have other question; the CD's sent by lenovo are not AUTO PLAYABLE ?

what if you press your blue thinkvantage button during startup? does it take you to the recovery partition?
Regards,
Jin Li
May this year, be the year of 'DO'!
I am a volunteer, and not a paid staff of Lenovo or Microsoft

Report taking too much time in the portal

Hi freiends,
we have developed a report on the ods,and we publish the same on the portal.
the problem is when the users are executing the report at the same time it is taking too much time.because of this the perfoemance is very poor.
is there any way to sort out this issue,like can we send the report to the individual user's mail id
so that they can not log in to the portal
or can we create the same report on the cube.
what could be the main difference if the report made on the cube or ods?
please help me
thanks in advance
sridath

Hi
Try this to improve performance of query
Find the query Run-time
where to find the query Run-time ?
557870 'FAQ BW Query Performance'
130696 - Performance trace in BW
This info may be helpful.
General tips
Using aggregates and compression.
Using less and complex cell definitions if possible.
1. Avoid using too many nav. attr
2. Avoid RKF and CKF
3. Many chars in row.
By using T-codes ST03 or ST03N
Go to transaction ST03 > switch to expert mode > from left side menu > and there in system load history and distribution for a particular day > check query execution time.
/people/andreas.vogel/blog/2007/04/08/statistical-records-part-4-how-to-read-st03n-datasets-from-db-in-nw2004
/people/andreas.vogel/blog/2007/03/16/how-to-read-st03n-datasets-from-db
Try table rsddstats to get the statistics
Using cache memory will decrease the loading time of the report.
Run reporting agent at night and sending results to email. This will ensure use of OLAP cache. So later report execution will retrieve the result faster from the OLAP cache.
Also try
1. Use different parameters in ST03 to see the two important parameters aggregation ratio and records transferred to F/E to DB selected.
2. Use the program SAP_INFOCUBE_DESIGNS (Performance of BW infocubes) to see the aggregation ratio for the cube. If the cube does not appear in the list of this report, try to run RSRV checks on the cube and aggregates.
Go to SE38 > Run the program SAP_INFOCUBE_DESIGNS
It will shown dimension Vs Fact tables Size in percent.If you mean speed of queries on a cube as performance metric of cube,measure query runtime.
3. To check the performance of the aggregates,see the columns valuation and usage in aggregates.
Open the Aggregates...and observe VALUATION and USAGE columns.
"---" sign is the valuation of the aggregate. You can say -3 is the valuation of the aggregate design and usage. ++ means that its compression is good and access is also more (in effect, performance is good). If you check its compression ratio, it must be good. -- means the compression ratio is not so good and access is also not so good (performance is not so good).The more is the positives...more is useful the aggregate and more it satisfies the number of queries. The greater the number of minus signs, the worse the evaluation of the aggregate. The larger the number of plus signs, the better the evaluation of the aggregate.
if "-----" then it means it just an overhead. Aggregate can potentially be deleted and "+++++" means Aggregate is potentially very useful.
In valuation column,if there are more positive sign it means that the aggregate performance is good and it is useful to have this aggregate.But if it has more negative sign it means we need not better use that aggregate.
In usage column,we will come to know how far the aggregate has been used in query.
Thus we can check the performance of the aggregate.
Refer.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/b8/23813b310c4a0ee10000000a114084/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/60/f0fb411e255f24e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
performance ISSUE related to AGGREGATE
Note 356732 - Performance Tuning for Queries with Aggregates
Note 166433 - Options for finding aggregates (find optimal aggregates for an InfoCube)
4. Run your query in RSRT and run the query in the debug mode. Select "Display Aggregates Found" and "Do not use cache" in the debug mode. This will tell you if it hit any aggregates while running. If it does not show any aggregates, you might want to redesign your aggregates for the query.
Also your query performance can depend upon criteria and since you have given selection only on one infoprovider...just check if you are selecting huge amount of data in the report
Check for the query read mode in RSRT.(whether its A,X or H)..advisable read mode is X.
5. In BI 7 statistics need to be activated for ST03 and BI admin cockpit to work.
By implementing BW Statistics Business Content - you need to install, feed data and through ready made reports which for analysis.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/26/4bc0417951d117e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
/people/vikash.agrawal/blog/2006/04/17/query-performance-150-is-aggregates-the-way-out-for-me
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/1955ba90-0201-0010-d3aa-8b2a4ef6bbb2
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/ce7fb368-0601-0010-64ba-fadc985a1f94
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/c1/0dbf65e04311d286d6006008b32e84/frameset.htm
You can go to T-Code DB20 which gives you all the performance related information like
Partitions
Databases
Schemas
Buffer Pools
Tablespaces etc
use tool RSDDK_CHECK_AGGREGATE in se38 to check for the corrupt aggregates
If aggregates contain incorrect data, you must regenerate them.
202469 - Using aggregate check tool
Note 646402 - Programs for checking aggregates (as of BW 3.0B SP15)
You can find out whether an aggregate is usefull or useless you can find out through a proccess of checking the tables RSDDSTATAGGRDEF*
Run the query in RSRT with statistics execute and come back you will get STATUID... copy this and check in the table...
This gives you exactly which infoobjects it's hitting, if any one of the object is missing it's useless aggregate.
6
Check SE11 > table RSDDAGGRDIR . You can find the last callup in the table.
Generate Report in RSRT
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/cccad390-0201-0010-5093-fd9ec8157802
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/4c0ab590-0201-0010-bd9a-8332d8b4f09c
Business Intelligence Journal Improving Query Performance in Data Warehouses
http://www.tdwi.org/Publications/BIJournal/display.aspx?ID=7891
Achieving BI Query Performance Building Business Intelligence
http://www.dmreview.com/issues/20051001/1038109-1.html
Assign points if useful
Cheers
SM

Data extracting to BW from R3 taking too much time

Hi,
We have one delta data load to ODS from R3 this is taking 4-5 hours .this job runs in r3 itself for 4-5 hours even for 30-40 records.and after this ODS data updated to cube so but since in ODS itself takes too much time so delta brings 0 records in cube hence we have to update manually.
Also as now job is running for load to ODS so can't we check records for delta in RSA3 Its giving me error saying "error occurs during extraction ".
can u please guide how we can make this loading faster if any index needs to be build how to proceed on that front
Thanks
Nilesh

rAHUL,
I tried with R its giving me dump with message "Resul of customer enhancemnet 19571 records"
Erro details are -
Short text
    Function module " " not found.
What happened?
    The function module " " is called,
    but cannot be found in the library.
    Error in the ABAP Application Program
    The current ABAP program "SAPLRSA3" had to be terminated because
    come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
What can you do?
    Note down which actions and inputs caused the error.
    To process the problem further, contact you SAP system
    administrator.
    Using Transaction ST22 for ABAP Dump Analysis, you can look
    at and manage termination messages, and you can also
    keep them for a long time.

Bought i phone 6 64 GB just 3 days before performance is very bad.Couldn't even open app store it takes too much time for opening a web page.

bought i phone 6 64 GB just 3 days before performance is very bad.Couldn't even open app store it takes too much time for opening a web page.

You may need to reset your network settings, making sure the network you're accessing is stable: tap Settings > General > Reset > Reset Network Settings.
If your iPhone still can't connect to App Store, tap Settings > iTunes & App Store > tap the Apple ID and sign out > later, sign in with your Apple ID.

SELECT query takes too much time! Y?

Plz find my SELECT query below:
select w~mandt
wvbeln wposnr wmeins wmatnr wwerks wnetwr
wkwmeng wvrkme wmatwa wcharg w~pstyv
wposar wprodh wgrkor wantlf wkztlf wlprio
wvstel wroute wumvkz wumvkn wabgru wuntto
wawahr werdat werzet wfixmg wprctr wvpmat
wvpwrk wmvgr1 wmvgr2 wmvgr3 wmvgr4 wmvgr5
wbedae wcuobj w~mtvfp
xetenr xwmeng xbmeng xettyp xwepos xabart
x~edatu
xtddat xmbdat xlddat xwadat xabruf xetart
x~ezeit
into table t_vbap
from vbap as w
inner join vbep as x on xvbeln = wvbeln and
xposnr = wposnr and
xmandt = wmandt
where
( ( werdat > pre_dat ) and ( werdat <= w_date ) ) and
( ( ( erdat > pre_dat and erdat < p_syndt ) or
( erdat = p_syndt and erzet <= p_syntm ) ) ) and
w~matnr in s_matnr and
w~pstyv in s_itmcat and
w~lfrel in s_lfrel and
w~abgru = ' ' and
w~kwmeng > 0 and
w~mtvfp in w_mtvfp and
x~ettyp in w_ettyp and
x~bdart in s_req_tp and
x~plart in s_pln_tp and
x~etart in s_etart and
x~abart in s_abart and
( ( xlifsp in s_lifsp ) or ( xlifsp = ' ' ) ).
The problem: It takes too much time while executing this statement.
Could anybody change this statement and help me out to reduce the DB Access time?
Thx

Ways of Performance Tuning
1.     Selection Criteria
2.     Select Statements
     Select Queries
     SQL Interface
     Aggregate Functions
     For all Entries
Select Over more than one internal table
Selection Criteria
1.     Restrict the data to the selection criteria itself, rather than filtering it out using the ABAP code using CHECK statement.
2.     Select with selection list.
SELECT * FROM SBOOK INTO SBOOK_WA.
CHECK: SBOOK_WA-CARRID = 'LH' AND
         SBOOK_WA-CONNID = '0400'.
ENDSELECT.
The above code can be much more optimized by the code written below which avoids CHECK, selects with selection list
SELECT CARRID CONNID FLDATE BOOKID FROM SBOOK INTO TABLE T_SBOOK
WHERE SBOOK_WA-CARRID = 'LH' AND
              SBOOK_WA-CONNID = '0400'.
Select Statements   Select Queries
1.     Avoid nested selects
SELECT * FROM EKKO INTO EKKO_WA.
SELECT * FROM EKAN INTO EKAN_WA
      WHERE EBELN = EKKO_WA-EBELN.
ENDSELECT.
ENDSELECT.
The above code can be much more optimized by the code written below.
SELECT PF1 PF2 FF3 FF4 INTO TABLE ITAB
    FROM EKKO AS P INNER JOIN EKAN AS F
      ON PEBELN = FEBELN.
Note: A simple SELECT loop is a single database access whose result is passed to the ABAP program line by line. Nested SELECT loops mean that the number of accesses in the inner loop is multiplied by the number of accesses in the outer loop. One should therefore use nested SELECT loops only if the selection in the outer loop contains very few lines or the outer loop is a SELECT SINGLE statement.
2.     Select all the records in a single shot using into table clause of select statement rather than to use Append statements.
SELECT * FROM SBOOK INTO SBOOK_WA.
CHECK: SBOOK_WA-CARRID = 'LH' AND
         SBOOK_WA-CONNID = '0400'.
ENDSELECT.
The above code can be much more optimized by the code written below which avoids CHECK, selects with selection list and puts the data in one shot using into table
SELECT CARRID CONNID FLDATE BOOKID FROM SBOOK INTO TABLE T_SBOOK
WHERE SBOOK_WA-CARRID = 'LH' AND
              SBOOK_WA-CONNID = '0400'.
3.     When a base table has multiple indices, the where clause should be in the order of the index, either a primary or a secondary index.
To choose an index, the optimizer checks the field names specified in the where clause and then uses an index that has the same order of the fields. In certain scenarios, it is advisable to check whether a new index can speed up the performance of a program. This will come handy in programs that access data from the finance tables.
4.     For testing existence, use Select.. Up to 1 rows statement instead of a Select-Endselect-loop with an Exit.
SELECT * FROM SBOOK INTO SBOOK_WA
UP TO 1 ROWS
WHERE CARRID = 'LH'.
ENDSELECT.
The above code is more optimized as compared to the code mentioned below for testing existence of a record.
SELECT * FROM SBOOK INTO SBOOK_WA
    WHERE CARRID = 'LH'.
EXIT.
ENDSELECT.
5.     Use Select Single if all primary key fields are supplied in the Where condition .
If all primary key fields are supplied in the Where conditions you can even use Select Single.
Select Single requires one communication with the database system, whereas Select-Endselect needs two.
Select Statements SQL Interface
1.     Use column updates instead of single-row updates
to update your database tables.
SELECT * FROM SFLIGHT INTO SFLIGHT_WA.
SFLIGHT_WA-SEATSOCC =
    SFLIGHT_WA-SEATSOCC - 1.
UPDATE SFLIGHT FROM SFLIGHT_WA.
ENDSELECT.
The above mentioned code can be more optimized by using the following code
UPDATE SFLIGHT
       SET SEATSOCC = SEATSOCC - 1.
2.     For all frequently used Select statements, try to use an index.
SELECT * FROM SBOOK CLIENT SPECIFIED INTO SBOOK_WA
WHERE CARRID = 'LH'
    AND CONNID = '0400'.
ENDSELECT.
The above mentioned code can be more optimized by using the following code
SELECT * FROM SBOOK CLIENT SPECIFIED INTO SBOOK_WA
WHERE MANDT IN ( SELECT MANDT FROM T000 )
    AND CARRID = 'LH'
    AND CONNID = '0400'.
ENDSELECT.
3.     Using buffered tables improves the performance considerably.
Bypassing the buffer increases the network considerably
SELECT SINGLE * FROM T100 INTO T100_WA
BYPASSING BUFFER
WHERE     SPRSL = 'D'
        AND ARBGB = '00'
        AND MSGNR = '999'.
The above mentioned code can be more optimized by using the following code
SELECT SINGLE * FROM T100 INTO T100_WA
WHERE     SPRSL = 'D'
        AND ARBGB = '00'
        AND MSGNR = '999'.
Select Statements Aggregate Functions
     If you want to find the maximum, minimum, sum and average value or the count of a database column, use a select list with aggregate functions instead of computing the aggregates yourself.
Some of the Aggregate functions allowed in SAP are MAX, MIN, AVG, SUM, COUNT, COUNT( * )
Consider the following extract.
            Maxno = 0.
            Select * from zflight where airln = LF and cntry = IN.
             Check zflight-fligh > maxno.
             Maxno = zflight-fligh.
            Endselect.
The above mentioned code can be much more optimized by using the following code.
Select max( fligh ) from zflight into maxno where airln = LF and cntry = IN.
Select Statements For All Entries
     The for all entries creates a where clause, where all the entries in the driver table are combined with OR. If the number of entries in the driver table is larger than rsdb/max_blocking_factor, several similar SQL statements are executed to limit the length of the WHERE clause.
     The plus
     Large amount of data
     Mixing processing and reading of data
     Fast internal reprocessing of data
     Fast
     The Minus
     Difficult to program/understand
     Memory could be critical (use FREE or PACKAGE size)
Points to be must considered FOR ALL ENTRIES
     Check that data is present in the driver table
     Sorting the driver table
     Removing duplicates from the driver table
Consider the following piece of extract
          Loop at int_cntry.
Select single * from zfligh into int_fligh
where cntry = int_cntry-cntry.
Append int_fligh.
                      Endloop.
The above mentioned can be more optimized by using the following code.
Sort int_cntry by cntry.
Delete adjacent duplicates from int_cntry.
If NOT int_cntry[] is INITIAL.
            Select * from zfligh appending table int_fligh
            For all entries in int_cntry
            Where cntry = int_cntry-cntry.
Endif.
Select Statements Select Over more than one Internal table
1.     Its better to use a views instead of nested Select statements.
SELECT * FROM DD01L INTO DD01L_WA
WHERE DOMNAME LIKE 'CHAR%'
        AND AS4LOCAL = 'A'.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM DD01T INTO DD01T_WA
    WHERE   DOMNAME    = DD01L_WA-DOMNAME
        AND AS4LOCAL   = 'A'
        AND AS4VERS    = DD01L_WA-AS4VERS
        AND DDLANGUAGE = SY-LANGU.
ENDSELECT.
The above code can be more optimized by extracting all the data from view DD01V_WA
SELECT * FROM DD01V INTO DD01V_WA
WHERE DOMNAME LIKE 'CHAR%'
        AND DDLANGUAGE = SY-LANGU.
ENDSELECT
2.     To read data from several logically connected tables use a join instead of nested Select statements. Joins are preferred only if all the primary key are available in WHERE clause for the tables that are joined. If the primary keys are not provided in join the Joining of tables itself takes time.
SELECT * FROM EKKO INTO EKKO_WA.
SELECT * FROM EKAN INTO EKAN_WA
      WHERE EBELN = EKKO_WA-EBELN.
ENDSELECT.
ENDSELECT.
The above code can be much more optimized by the code written below.
SELECT PF1 PF2 FF3 FF4 INTO TABLE ITAB
    FROM EKKO AS P INNER JOIN EKAN AS F
      ON PEBELN = FEBELN.
3.     Instead of using nested Select loops it is often better to use subqueries.
SELECT * FROM SPFLI
INTO TABLE T_SPFLI
WHERE CITYFROM = 'FRANKFURT'
    AND CITYTO = 'NEW YORK'.
SELECT * FROM SFLIGHT AS F
    INTO SFLIGHT_WA
    FOR ALL ENTRIES IN T_SPFLI
    WHERE SEATSOCC < F~SEATSMAX
      AND CARRID = T_SPFLI-CARRID
      AND CONNID = T_SPFLI-CONNID
      AND FLDATE BETWEEN '19990101' AND '19990331'.
ENDSELECT.
The above mentioned code can be even more optimized by using subqueries instead of for all entries.
SELECT * FROM SFLIGHT AS F INTO SFLIGHT_WA
    WHERE SEATSOCC < F~SEATSMAX
      AND EXISTS ( SELECT * FROM SPFLI
                     WHERE CARRID = F~CARRID
                       AND CONNID = F~CONNID
                       AND CITYFROM = 'FRANKFURT'
                       AND CITYTO = 'NEW YORK' )
      AND FLDATE BETWEEN '19990101' AND '19990331'.
ENDSELECT.
1.     Table operations should be done using explicit work areas rather than via header lines.
READ TABLE ITAB INTO WA WITH KEY K = 'X BINARY SEARCH.
IS MUCH FASTER THAN USING
READ TABLE ITAB INTO WA WITH KEY K = 'X'.
If TAB has n entries, linear search runs in O( n ) time, whereas binary search takes only O( log2( n ) ).
2.     Always try to use binary search instead of linear search. But dont forget to sort your internal table before that.
READ TABLE ITAB INTO WA WITH KEY K = 'X'. IS FASTER THAN USING
READ TABLE ITAB INTO WA WITH KEY (NAME) = 'X'.
3.     A dynamic key access is slower than a static one, since the key specification must be evaluated at runtime.
4.     A binary search using secondary index takes considerably less time.
5.     LOOP ... WHERE is faster than LOOP/CHECK because LOOP ... WHERE evaluates the specified condition internally.
LOOP AT ITAB INTO WA WHERE K = 'X'.
ENDLOOP.
The above code is much faster than using
LOOP AT ITAB INTO WA.
CHECK WA-K = 'X'.
ENDLOOP.
6.     Modifying selected components using MODIFY itab TRANSPORTING f1 f2.. accelerates the task of updating a line of an internal table.
WA-DATE = SY-DATUM.
MODIFY ITAB FROM WA INDEX 1 TRANSPORTING DATE.
The above code is more optimized as compared to
WA-DATE = SY-DATUM.
MODIFY ITAB FROM WA INDEX 1.
7.     Accessing the table entries directly in a "LOOP ... ASSIGNING ..." accelerates the task of updating a set of lines of an internal table considerably
Modifying selected components only makes the program faster as compared to Modifying all lines completely.
e.g,
LOOP AT ITAB ASSIGNING <WA>.
I = SY-TABIX MOD 2.
IF I = 0.
    <WA>-FLAG = 'X'.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
The above code works faster as compared to
LOOP AT ITAB INTO WA.
I = SY-TABIX MOD 2.
IF I = 0.
    WA-FLAG = 'X'.
    MODIFY ITAB FROM WA.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
8.    If collect semantics is required, it is always better to use to COLLECT rather than READ BINARY and then ADD.
LOOP AT ITAB1 INTO WA1.
READ TABLE ITAB2 INTO WA2 WITH KEY K = WA1-K BINARY SEARCH.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
    ADD: WA1-VAL1 TO WA2-VAL1,
         WA1-VAL2 TO WA2-VAL2.
    MODIFY ITAB2 FROM WA2 INDEX SY-TABIX TRANSPORTING VAL1 VAL2.
ELSE.
    INSERT WA1 INTO ITAB2 INDEX SY-TABIX.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
The above code uses BINARY SEARCH for collect semantics. READ BINARY runs in O( log2(n) ) time. The above piece of code can be more optimized by
LOOP AT ITAB1 INTO WA.
COLLECT WA INTO ITAB2.
ENDLOOP.
SORT ITAB2 BY K.
COLLECT, however, uses a hash algorithm and is therefore independent
of the number of entries (i.e. O(1)) .
9.    "APPEND LINES OF itab1 TO itab2" accelerates the task of appending a table to another table considerably as compared to LOOP-APPEND-ENDLOOP.
APPEND LINES OF ITAB1 TO ITAB2.
This is more optimized as compared to
LOOP AT ITAB1 INTO WA.
APPEND WA TO ITAB2.
ENDLOOP.
10.   DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES accelerates the task of deleting duplicate entries considerably as compared to READ-LOOP-DELETE-ENDLOOP.
DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES FROM ITAB COMPARING K.
This is much more optimized as compared to
READ TABLE ITAB INDEX 1 INTO PREV_LINE.
LOOP AT ITAB FROM 2 INTO WA.
IF WA = PREV_LINE.
    DELETE ITAB.
ELSE.
    PREV_LINE = WA.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
11.   "DELETE itab FROM ... TO ..." accelerates the task of deleting a sequence of lines considerably as compared to DO -DELETE-ENDDO.
DELETE ITAB FROM 450 TO 550.
This is much more optimized as compared to
DO 101 TIMES.
DELETE ITAB INDEX 450.
ENDDO.
12.   Copying internal tables by using ITAB2[ ] = ITAB1[ ] as compared to LOOP-APPEND-ENDLOOP.
ITAB2[] = ITAB1[].
This is much more optimized as compared to
REFRESH ITAB2.
LOOP AT ITAB1 INTO WA.
APPEND WA TO ITAB2.
ENDLOOP.
13.   Specify the sort key as restrictively as possible to run the program faster.
SORT ITAB BY K. makes the program runs faster as compared to SORT ITAB.
Internal Tables         contd
Hashed and Sorted tables
1.     For single read access hashed tables are more optimized as compared to sorted tables.
2.      For partial sequential access sorted tables are more optimized as compared to hashed tables
Hashed And Sorted Tables
Point # 1
Consider the following example where HTAB is a hashed table and STAB is a sorted table
DO 250 TIMES.
N = 4 * SY-INDEX.
READ TABLE HTAB INTO WA WITH TABLE KEY K = N.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
ENDIF.
ENDDO.
This runs faster for single read access as compared to the following same code for sorted table
DO 250 TIMES.
N = 4 * SY-INDEX.
READ TABLE STAB INTO WA WITH TABLE KEY K = N.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
ENDIF.
ENDDO.
Point # 2
Similarly for Partial Sequential access the STAB runs faster as compared to HTAB
LOOP AT STAB INTO WA WHERE K = SUBKEY.
ENDLOOP.
This runs faster as compared to
LOOP AT HTAB INTO WA WHERE K = SUBKEY.
ENDLOOP.

PDPageDrawContentsToWindowEx takes too much time

We are using an Acrobat plugin that renders the PDF file to a bitmap in memory.
We are using Acrobat Professional X. But same problems also appear on Acrobat 9.
We have received several problematic PDF files from our customers that is causing the call that renders the image -
PDPageDrawContentsToWindowEx() to take unreasonably long time.
My target resolutions is 600 dpi but I couldn't wait for the call to return, after more than 6 minutes I kill the process.
The same PDFs render in Acrobat with slight delay (flickering and repainting) but in reasonable time.
I have written for this problem on previous occasions (Aug 5 2010). Since then further problematic samples
show that is linked somehow with transparency being present, but not on all PDFs with transparency.
We have a fast computer so the problem is somewhere in the PDF analysis.
Trying to optimize the file didn't help.
Checking with Preflight for PDF syntax issues also didn't find anything.

I'll have to check the headers, but I KNOW that we exposed it to plugins in A9 – it was necessary since we pulled the DrawToWindow call on the Mac (carbon vs. cocoa).
What you are asking the SDK to do is going to be painful on large complex images. Drawing into an HDC/Window adds SIGNIFICANT overhead to our rendering process, since we have to do all the work in our own "bit buffer" and then copy that buffer into the OS's provided HDC. OUCH! This is why DrawToMemory is better.
Additionally, if you have files with complex transparency AND you want OverprintPreview, that's also going to be VERY complex rendering pipeline – made WORSE by the need to end up in an HDC. Forgetting separations for the moment, consider that we have to convert everything to CMYK (since you can only compute OP in CMYK), blend colors, then convert all of that to RGB. And that's assuming SIMPLE transparency. If you have multiple blending groups, soft masks, etc. then you just raised the bar even more!
How long does it take Acrobat to open up the PDF and render it completely to screen? For separations, how long does it take to do a "Flatten Transparency" operation?
UpdateRect won't help because of the OP and then transparency flattening
From: Adobe Forums <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 06:45:46 -0800
To: Leonard Rosenthol <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: PDPageDrawContentsToWindowEx takes too much time
Re: PDPageDrawContentsToWindowEx takes too much time
created by Nikolay Tasev<http://forums.adobe.com/people/Nikolay+Tasev> in Acrobat SDK - View the full discussion<http://forums.adobe.com/message/4064198#4064198

0PM_OM_OPA_2 needs too much time

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for