0PM_ORDER loading time too long

Hi All. We have about 600 000 PM orders in the system. Loading the master data attributes for this into BW/BI takes almost an hour. There seems to be no delta load available. Most of this running time is on ECC6. I cannot restrict the orders in the info package because there are orders created a long time ago which are still active.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Johan Loock

We have just under 600,000. After perfroming a full load of all Orders, what we did to deal with 0PM_ORDER load times was to use the ABAP Conversion exit on the Infopackage's Data Selection tab. The datasource contains Created On(ERDAT) and Change(AEDAT) dates and we rely on those dates to filter the Orders we extract.
We load two Infopackages (full loads) each day, one that loads any Orders created in the last 7 days and another that loads any Orders changed in the last 7 days.
ABAP conversion exit code for created in last 7 days -
data: l_low_date like sy-datum,
l_idx like sy-tabix.
read table l_t_range with key
fieldname = 'ERDAT'.
l_idx = sy-tabix.
l_low_date = sy-datum - 6.
l_t_range-option = 'BT'.
l_t_range-low = l_low_date.
l_t_range-high = sy-datum.
modify l_t_range index l_idx.
p_subrc = 0.
The Changed code is the same, but it references AEDAT.
The load times for the Created and Changed Infopackages are about 1 - 2 minutes each.

Similar Messages

Email loading times too long (Gmail, E75)

Hi dudes, and thanks for reading.
Email provider: Gmail
Phone: E75
Phone firmware: 202.12.01 (the newest)
I'm getting pretty long waiting times when my phone loads my emails.
I have set up an account to the phone's email application. It lists the emails in real time, but when I try to open an one, the loading time gets overwhelming.
It is not a pleasure to use the email application.
Can I do anything for this? Another app?
Any help wuold be appreciated!!!

Multiple reasons too hard to guess.
First step of ts - reset network settings

Data loading time too long

Hi there,
I have two Infopackages - one for year 2003 and one for year 2004. For year 2003 I use interval 200301-200312 and for year 2004 I use interval 200401-200412 as data selection. Then I started to load data from R/3. For year 2003 we have 4.9 Millions records and took 6 hours to load and for year 2004 we have 5.5 Millions records and took 46 hours to load. The interesting thing was that when I tried to use InfoPackage 2003 and put the interval 200401-200412 as data selection for loading 2004 data, it took only 7.x hours! Why? Is something wrong with the InfoPackage for 2004? Any idea and suggestion is greatly appreciated.
Weidong

Hi Weidong,
Check the processing type in both the infopackages. May be one of the infopackages has "PSA and then into Data Target" and the other infopackage has "PSA and Data Target in parallel".
Bye
Dinesh

Loading time too long for my native application

Hello,
I've built an exe width adt and i regret that there is no screen to inform the user while the application "preparing the installation" when you execute it as does the air application.
The problem is : when I executes the exe application , it seems that nothing happens for about ten seconds.
I use this syntax to build my app :
adt -package %OPTIONS% %SIGNING_OPTIONS% -target native [WINDOWS_INSTALLER_SIGNING_OPTIONS] %EXE_PATH%\%EXE_NAME%.exe %APP_XML% %FILE_OR_DIR%
Does adt, or Adobe offer a solution, that solve the problem ? (I'd like to avoid having to hack myself or with the help of a software like "Advance Installer" the installation of my app)
Thank a lot.

How large is the installer? I suspect the delay is due to the self extraction taking place.
I took a look in our internal database and it appears we had something similar entered back in 2010 that was unfortunately deferred. At this point, I'd recommend using a captive runtime and rolling your own installer with it's own UI. The other alternative is to add a bug/feature request over at bugbase.adobe.com, then let the community know so that others can add comments and cast votes for it.
Thanks,
Chris

Why my adobe edge animation taking load time too much

Hi
why my adobe edge animation taking load time too much.
Plsease guide me.

Hi, Rohan-
Can you upload your file for us to take a look at? It's hard for us to tell what's going on without taking a look.
Thanks,
-Elaine

Average processing time too long in workload monitoring (ST03N)

Hi expert,
I wander why average processing time too long in workload monitoring (ST03N)
for example
avg.response time : 4700 (ms)
avg.processing time : 4200 (ms)
avg.CPU time : 300 (ms)
avg.DB time : 200(ms)
OS (CPU and memory ) status is nomal.
please tell me why processing time too long and what do I check more.
thanks

Hi
Processing Time is the total time taken i.e. Time when user clicks on submit button to send data to SAP System till the time SAP System processes everything and shows the updated screen back to the user. It includes Network Time also.
Average Processing Time is the Processing Time per Dialog Step
In ST03N workload Monitor, there are different Task Type like Dialog, Background, RFC, Update,..........
Could you be more specific where do you find the Average Processing Time high ? I mean for which Task Type.
If you have users complaining for Performance problem check their Network Time also.
Let us know, if this information was helpful to you.
with regards,
Parin Hariyani

Quicktime page loads taking too long

I've got a page I'm building with 10 short mp3 clips. Here's a sample of the code for each clip:
<object classid="clsid:02bf25d5-8c17-4b23-bc80-d3488abddc6b" codebase=
"http://www.apple.com/qtactivex/qtplugin.cab"
width="49" height="16">
<param name="src" value="http://www.mysite.com/test/mp3/lookoflove.mp3">
<param name="autoplay" value="false">
<param name="controller" value="true">
</object>
Is there a parameter I can add that would keep the page from preloading all of the files and make it so the file wouldn't actually load until the 'play' button was pressed? The files are all around 600-700kb each which, by themselves don't take too long but all together make the page a little too long to wait for.

let's put it this way. if you do File>Export>Quicktime you'll make a quicktime file with the same compressor as your sequence and it'll render faster. If you select File>Export>Quicktime Conversion you can make a quicktime file with a compression of your choice. (although the conversion process takes time). so you could compress it into a DVCPRO 50 quicktime, or an uncompressed quickime or H.264 quicktime. any of these settings will play in quicktime. These you can select through the options button in the converter window. we just suggest you use Export>Quicktime because it's faster easier and it's useless in your situation to convert.

Movie Load Time Too Slow

Hello!
I've created three movies for a new website; all photo slide shows with 10-14 photos and some text. The photos have all been optimized in Photoshop and saved for web...most are under 100kb, however the movies are taking a long time to load on the webpages. Is there anything I can do through Edge Animate to reduce the load time? Even with the preloader, the load time is way too long. I've inserted the movies into the html pages using iframe. Any suggestions are much appreciated. Thanks!

Hi Simon,
I want to reduce Power View blank canvas / PowerView report load time from SSAS Tabular source in the SharePoint 2013 Portal.
I have observed that a PowerView report with 1 View, loads faster than a PowerView report with multiple (4) Views, so I think that your statement "Power View only retrieves the data it needs at any given time for a data visualization" might
be incorrect.
I have read the link you have provided and have all the patches applied, besides I am not using a Power Pivot source.
My tabular cube is complex and has about 200 measures, and the blank Power View canvas takes about 13 seconds to load in SharePoint 2013 URL from web browser. Appreciate if you can provide any insights here please.
Thanks, Ashish Singh

Profile WS run time too long

My first test run (in dev) of the custom Java PWS against a SQL server database seems to be taking too long. Its seems to be taking appx. 1 second or more per user. This will be a problem when processing around 20,000 users. We can't have a PWS running for 4-6 hours everynight.
I'd really appreciate any tips to optimize this for faster performance. I am opening DB Connection and running 2 queries for each users and clsoing the statement and connection. Can I do this another way so I open the DB connection(and maybe statement) for the Profile Source only once and release the connection etc. after the whole job is done or in case of errors.
Please help as this could be a huge bottleneck for us!
Thanks.
Vanita
Staples

Hi Akash,
Thanks for your quick reply. Unfortunately I don't have any signature field to limit the profile sync by. I am currently running the PWs in ToMCAT 4.1.30. We plan to deploy on WAS in dev. I am not sure if there is connection pooling being done by Tomcat in 4.1.30 version. Do you have any information on that? I am doing db connect and 2 property queries in the getuserproperties method.
1. Would the connection pooling (if done in WAS) make any difference to the run time?
2. Would opening the connection in initialize() method versus GetUserProperties() make any difference?
As always, thanks for your help.
Vanita
------- Akash Jain wrote on 3/1/05 1:25 PM -------Hi Vanita,On recent hardware, you should be able to perform an initial profile sync at at a rate of ~10/second. This means you should be able to perform your 20k users profile sync in under an hour. Resyncs should be much faster if you use a signature attribute.
I'm going to assume you're hitting some database backend with a table structure like the following:Users Table String UserGUID Date LastModified
Properties Table int PropID String UserGUID String PropValue
You have your users keyed off a unique name - a GUID in this example - and properties in a seperate table keyed off PropID and GUID.
Lets review the protocol and each step:a) initialize() - sends the parameters of the profile sync to the PWS, this is a good place to do a single query to your database in order to cache all user unique names and signatures (LastModified dates) in a HashTable. This will make re-syncs much faster since subsequent AttachToUser() and GetUserSignature() calls will be derived from this HashTable.b) attachToUser() - in this call you can simply lookup your user record against the HashTable created in Initialize(). If no entry is returned, then throw a NoSuchUserException. If a user does exist continue.c) getUserSignature() - again use the HashTable created in Initialize() to lookup the signature for this user. return it as a String.d) getUserProperties() - if called, this means the signature you sent back in step (c) has changed since the last profile sync. you now want to make a call to your properties table (a single DB call) to load all the property values for the user. return these as a UserPropertyInfo object.
During an initital sync, you will always get to step (d) above. During re-syncs, assuming there is low churn, I'd say a max of 1% of your calls will get to step (d) and thus the re-sync should be an order of magnitude faster in most cases.
With respect to database connections - if you are opening and closing a connection for each user, this is pretty poor with respect to performance. Your best bet in Java is to use a single connection (this is a single threaded process) which is setup in initialize(). In the shutdown() method, close this connection.
I hope this helps, the combination of using a single connection, using the signature attribute and caching all the users unique names and signatures in one call at the start of the profile sync should drastically increase performance.
Thanks,Akash

Load times seem long

This is my first website I'm doing completely in Edge Animate, which I love, by the way.
http://www.mercerhrs.com/marcomm_world/index.html
It seems that between pages, the load time seems a bit longer then I'm used to. If you click on some of the buildings, say "CommLab" or "Resource Group", it seems to take a bit longer then I'd like to load.
Any suggestions? Can I preload all the javascript when a user hits the home page?

Humm - no lag here at all - in fact, very nice and smooth transitions.
Nice graphics, by the way.
Darrell

Download time too long

Why is it taking too long to download a song? Im talking HOURS if it even happens!

Could you download the graphics dynamically as they are required?
So, the air app would be the master 'app' and those additional
graphics are loaded from your server only when required? I'd bet this
would be the way you'd build it if the app were purely based online
and not via air?
Dave Cates
Managing Director
Redemption Media Ltd
www.redemptionmedia.co.uk
Interactive internet, media & communications solutions.
Sent from my iPhone

Elapsed Timer Too Long?

Is there a limit to the duration I can input into an elapsed timer VI? In my program the user can specify a duration of up to 24 hrs. My program is supposed to hold current conditions for the specified durations. When the user sets it 1, 2, 3 or four hours it holds the current conditions fine. When they set it to 24 hours the current conditions are not held for 24 hours. Is this too long of a duration for this VI (86,400 seconds)?
thanks.

rchaoua wrote:
The question regarding maximum duration a elapsed time VI has still not been answered.
You can convert the "elapsed time" express VI to a plain VI by "right-click...open front panel" and inspect the code yourself. There are no secrets! You can see that it converts the timestamp to DBL and operates on the lower precision DBL values. This should be sufficient for much more than 24 hours, so something else is wrong in your case.
Can you attach an example that shows the incorrect behavior (=premature elapsation?).
rchaoua wrote:
But I have another question; Can you have multiple elapsed time VI in a single piece of code and not have it affect the other elapsed VIs? I have three elapsed timers in my code (in different panels) and get the sneaking supsicion that they are not behaving nicely with each other. But I am not sure. I was hoping someone has expereince with this scenario and could shed some light.
The crucial subVIs are reentrant and thus there should be no interaction between multiple instances of the "elapsed time" express VI. Each will keep it's own state. Why do you suspect that they interact?
LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .

IPhoto launch time too long

I now have a reasonably large iPhoto library. 12409 photos, 29.8GB. It's all on the internal drive of my MacBook Pro laptop. Running iPhoto 6.0.6, OS X 10.5.5
Launching iPhoto takes a long time. It takes a long time (about 1 minute) for the iPhoto window to appear and "loading photos" to be done. Once that is done, iPhoto sits with a spinning beachball cursor for about 5 minutes before I can do anything.
Additionally, iPhoto seems to crash intermittently, proving to be slow and unreliable.
The organisation into albums and slideshows, as well as keywords/captions is very useful. Plus I have to use it to import the photos because one cannot access a Canon camera as a memory device like virtually every other camera.
Otherwise I would have deleted the 475MB application from the disk. Talk about a bloated application!
Can anyone provide an insight into how to make the load time reasonable?
Cheers,
Matt

LarryHN wrote:
Probably a user bloated disk - iPhoto works very well IF you have adequate resources - your crashing and slowness both point to free disk space
Thanks for that constructive comment. I have 10GB free disk space and 2GB ram. Activity viewer shows the CPU is mostly idle, and plenty of free memory. iPhoto seems to be hung using about 5-10% cpu time.
I do have lots of stuff on my drive, but the machine is not struggling for CPU or memory, so I hardly think that is problem.
If I "Sample Process" on iPhoto it seems that it is spinning the beach ball whilst using about 5-10% of cpu time, mostly under a CFArraySort function call. Seems to me that the program design doesn't work very well with a library of 12000+photos.
Is iPhoto 7 significantly better in this regard? If so, I'll consider upgrading in the future, but if it has the same problems then I'll look for an alternative solution. The current working order of iPhoto 6 is unacceptable.
Thanks, Matt.

NI7358 Acceleration time too long

Hi all,
First, let me introduces briefly our application for your better understanding before touch the problem.
We're using NI7358 to control 8 servo motors(Mitsubishi HC-KFS13, 100W, 3000RPM, 131072Counts/Rev) for pick and place. The amplifier is also Mitsubishi one MELSERVO-J2M-P8A. From view of NI7358 all 8 axes are open-loop stepper while amplifier will close-loop control the servo motors. One limitation here is this amplifier only can accept 200KPPS pulse rate input, so we set amplifier internal gear ratio to 4096/125 to achieve its maximum speed.
GearRatio=(3000rpm*131072count/60)/(200*1000counts/sec)
Then based on this ratio we can know the resolution of "stepper" in view of NI7358 is 4000RPM. (131072*125/4096)
Now our problem is:
The system requires these motors move in short distance(1200steps for NI7358) in the shortest time. So we want to shorten the acceleration/deceleration time as possible as we can. As we test the same application before using Keyence PLC as pulse generator, it can meet our target so we expect NI also can.
During testing using MAX under 1-D interactive, when I set Velocity=3000rpm, Accel/Decel=20000rps/s, target=1200steps, I can get the best result around 1040rpm(peak velocity) with Accel/Decel time around 50ms. The time is too long for us. If I set increase Accel/Deceleration to its maximum* NI7358 will stop pulse output at all(don't know why but suspect it's because of short distance)
* Maximum Accel/Deceleration(RPS/s) = Amax X (1/Ts) X (1/Ts) X (1/R) (refer to the description of "flex_load_rpsps")
for our case: Amax=32counts/sample; Ts=0.25ms; R=4000steps/Rev, result is 128000(RPS/s)
Questions:
1. Is Amax=32counts/sample hardware fixed?
2. Any reason can cause NI7358 stop output pulse when I set maximum acceleration/decelration?
3. Does NI provide time-based profile instead of velocity one so we can set acceleration/deceleration time directly?
4. Can I use direct pulse output mode just like a pulse generator instead of current profile output?
5. Under open-loop mode, if I change PID & acceleration feedforward gain, do these will affect the output pulse performance?
6. If we change the control circuit from open-loop stepper to close-loop servo system, does it can solve our problem?
7. How does the trajectory generator produces the count/steps output during the acceleration? I create an excel file(attached below) try to draw out the relationship between the sample, velocity and acceleration, anyone can check for me it's correct or not?
My formula is here:
Position2 = Position1 + Velocity2*(Sample2-Sample1)
Velocity2 = Velocity1 + Acceleration*(Sample2-Sample1)
All comments are appreciated!
Attachments:
Profile Study.xls ‏28 KB

BO has no controls over VPN or network bamdwith, it takes what OS and DB drivers give it.
You'll need to identify at which point of the workflow to refresh the report the slowness is occuring.
You'll need to enable webi tracing and see how long the actual refresh take.
You'll need to enable network traces to see where in the network the slowdown is occuring.

PowerView (SharePoint 2013) Load time too slow

I am using PowerView in SharePoint 2013 and when I access the SSAS 2012 Tabular Data Source through a "Report Data Source", the PowerView Canvas with the Field List takes a long while to load and the users get restless seeing the Blue spinning
wheel. I tested this on different tabular models and am seeing different results based on the complexity of the model.
Complex Model - 13 secs.
Adventure Works Model - 9 secs.
Very Simple Model (1 fact, 1 dim) - 8 secs.
I think if the model is complex then the engine takes a longer time to render the field list. How to get around this limitation and bring the blank canvas load time to under 5 secs.? I am curious to know if anyone has ever seen lesser load times in their
environment for the blank PowerView canvas and field lists.
Alternatively, If the field list loading takes time, is it possible to disable it? Because, I have already created dashboards for the end users in PowerView and do not want to load the field list if it is slowing down the entire experience.
Appreciate any guidance.
Thanks, Ashish Singh

Hi Simon,
I want to reduce Power View blank canvas / PowerView report load time from SSAS Tabular source in the SharePoint 2013 Portal.
I have observed that a PowerView report with 1 View, loads faster than a PowerView report with multiple (4) Views, so I think that your statement "Power View only retrieves the data it needs at any given time for a data visualization" might
be incorrect.
I have read the link you have provided and have all the patches applied, besides I am not using a Power Pivot source.
My tabular cube is complex and has about 200 measures, and the blank Power View canvas takes about 13 seconds to load in SharePoint 2013 URL from web browser. Appreciate if you can provide any insights here please.
Thanks, Ashish Singh

0PM_ORDER loading time too long

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for