0PS_C04 (CONTROLLING) aggregate level

Hi,
I want to know if it's posible make to these extrators:
0PS_CSH_NWA: Payments in Network Activities
0PS_CSH_NTW: Network Payments
0PS_CSH_WBS: Payments in WBS Elements
More aggregate level, adding the doc_item field to them.
That it's posible? Or we have to make another extractors?
Thanks for your help.
Victoria

Check :
0CCA_C11 Delta and Full upload datasources.
0PS_C04 controlling - from which whcih data source should fill this cube
/thread/664877 [original link is broken]

Similar Messages

Key figure fixing in aggregate level partially locking

Hi Guys,
When fix the cell in the planning book, getting "One or more cells could not be completely fixed" message.
1. If a material having only one CVC in the MPOS those quantity can be fixed correctly without any issues.
2. If a material having more than 1 CVC combination and try to fix one of the CVC combination quantity, it is fixing partially and getting the above message.
3. Even, it is not allowing to fix the quantity in aggregate level also.
We are in SCM 7.0.
Is there precondition that need to fix the material having only one CVC combination.
Even a material having multiple CVC combination why it is not allowing to fix one CVC combination in detail level.
Is aggregate level key figure fixing is not allowed ?
Please clarify.
Thanks
Saravanan V

Hi,
It is not mandatory to assign Standard KF to be able to fix. However your custom infoobject that you created must be of type APO KF and not BW KF.
That said, Let us try and address your first problem.
You can fix at an aggregate level. However there a few points to remember.
Let us consider a couple of scenarios.
1) In your selection id, it is showing a number of products. You are selecting all the products at one go and load the data and try to fix at this level. This is not possible.
2) In your selection id, you have selected a product division. For a single product division you are loading data and try to fix at this level. This is the true aggregate level and it should be possible at this level.
Hope this helps.
Thanks
Mani Suresh

Keyfigure fixing at aggregate level

HI,
I am using APO V4,
1. I am planning to fix my keyfigure only at aggregate level, My keyfigure is open at all levels like plant or material group or material, i can enter the data at any point manually. but when come to keyfigure fixing, i want to fix the keyfigure only at aggregate level, i mean if the keyfigure is at material level i need fix, any other level it should not allow me to fix.
I was thinking for a drill down macro, but my keyfigure should open at all levels irrespective of keyfigure fixing, is it manageable any how that keyfigure can only be fixed at material level?
2. this is a different issue from above, i have fixed the keyfigure for a month, after that i had run a copy macro to the fixed key figure, but the fixed values are overwritten once the copy job is completed, and when i check in the planning book, it is visible as fixed agian. do i need to have any macro specific setting for this during the copy macro?
Thanks in Advance
ARUN R Y

Hi Gurus,
I am having some problems with Key Figure Fix.
The business requirement:
Some fields must be kept fixed and locked during the interactive planning performed in tc /SAPAPO/SDP94.
What was done in order to do it:
We created macros using standard features in order to fix and block some cells in accordance with the business requirements. The first macro disaggregates the planning to the last level available for collaboration. Another macro using FIX_CALC and ROW_INPUT functionalities fixes and locks some cells (3 levels). After these activities the planning view is aggregated and it will be ready for collaboration.
These macros run automatically every time that the user open an specific planning view.
The problem:
After the aggregation when the disaggregated level is called again all cells have been showed fixed and locked. If we perform the fix and lock manually the system run correctly, i.e., only the cells fixed and locked are kept in this status after an aggregating and disaggregating processes.
Step-by-step
u2022 Set the macro in /SAPAPO/ADVM u2013 MacroBuilder. To use the macro FIX_CALC in aggregated level. The first attribute set with ROW ATRIBUTES, the second attribute set with VALUES. FIX_CALC (Cota de Vendas; Cota de Vendas). With this setting, the aggregated line will be fixed.
u2022 Set the macro in /SAPAPO/ADVM u2013 MacroBuilder. To use the macro FIX_CALC in level 1. The first attribute set with ROW ATRIBUTES, the second attribute set with VALUES. FIX_CALC (Cota de Vendas; Cota de Vendas). With this setting, the level 1 line will be fixed.
u2022 Set the macro in /SAPAPO/ADVM u2013 MacroBuilder. To use the macro ROW_INPUT in aggregated level. Cota de vendas = ROW_INPUT ( 0 ). With this setting, the aggregated line will be locked.
u2022 Set the macro in /SAPAPO/ADVM u2013 MacroBuilder. To use the macro ROW_INPUT in level 1. Cota de vendas = ROW_INPUT ( 0 ). With this setting, the level 1 line will be locked.
u2022 Now, go to in /SAPAPO/SDP94.
u2022 Disaggregated the planning view.
u2022 Run the FIX_CALC and ROW_INPUT macros.
u2022 Aggregated the planning view.
u2022 Disaggregated the planning view again. You can see the problem.
Thanks,

How to do you control lower levels from the Stage?

How to you control lower levels from the Stage?
I have a button on the main stage and I have a symbol that has another symbol inside that I want to control that timeline or label.
I have had success with going one level deep but not two or three deep.
sym.getSymbol("symbol01").stop("label01");
Any help would be great!
Thanks.

Can you explain the hierachy of your symbols? By this I mean, name of your symbol and any symbol inside and any symbol inside nested symbol and what event you are triggering from where?

Aggregate Level

Hi all,
I am trying to create a aggregate for an infocube. Is it possible to create 2 different aggregate level for same Infoobject?
Say for exampl, i have infobject 0CO_AREA, i need to use it aggregation level 1 as well as aggregation level 2.
Please give me a suggestion,
Ill assign pionts,
Thanks in advance
Regards
Pooja

Not sure I understand the question.
You can certainly have multiple aggregates, with 0CO_AREA in each aggregate. You can have one aggregate be a more summarized aggregate. You can also create different aggregates with each on e specifying different fixed values for 0CO_AREA.
Or are you trying to create an aggregate that includes 0CO_AREA hierarchy levels?
Providing more details would help me understand what you want to do.

Whats Need of Multiple Aggregate Levels

Hi Gurus,
Can some one say whats the need of Multiple Aggregate Levels on a Multi provider?
Is it some thing Aggregate Levels are just to determine your level of Granularity you want to report upon?
If really ie the case cant we get it in the query it self by Free Characterstics, Drill Down, Slice and Dice Options?
Is any other strong reason for one need to go for Multiple Aggregate Levels or Aggregate Levels itself for that matter.
Thanks for clarification.
I am trying to understand things better as Iam very new to this area.
Regards,
BI-IP Guest

Manyak,
Really Thanks for your explanation. Though not completely but mostly I think I understand. Especially Iam really gtill time not aware of an Aggregate Level can supports Planning only at Lowest Granularity.
I read before that we cant change values at SUM, MIN/MAX Values. But now reading this I understand that we cant change values at Totals Level but only at items Level.
But again in your example can we change values at indepndent Line Item Level or For Region's Total Level at the end.
What in this Case if client wants to see both Country and Region under one Layout and both want to changeble for planning?
One more Last Question if that does not bother you..
What happens when one go for Input Read Query designed over the Multi-Provider (Contains a realtime Cube for Plan) it self instead of going to Multiple Aggregate levels or for that matter even a Single Aggregate Level also...All I want to know what difference it really makes for me in designing a Input ready Query or else in Getting my Layout or else in Planning Things.
Might be too many questions on Aggregate Levels but still I request to make me clear.
Thanks,
BI-IP Guest

Forecasting in DP: At aggregate level or at detailed level?

Hello All,
I have selection ID in APO DP 4.0 comprising of may products. I forecast them as a whole using some forecast method (may be seasonality method). How SAP DP forecasts? Does it individually forecast for each product or does it forecast at aggregate level? Has someone analyzed and come across such situation?
Thanks and Best Regards, Manoj

Dear Manoj,
The concept of selection and aggregation is very impotant in APO. Take an example:
You have a selection for packsize "Display SKU's under packsize A. Say there are 10 SKU's. Now when you run the forecast in the background, you need to define the selection and aggregation level. So for the same selection, if you have defnied the aggregation as SKU, the forecast job will for each SKU. However if "packsize" is selected in aggregation, the forecast will run at packsize level.
In the case of the interactive planning, the selection defines the aggregation level. Suppose you have loaded the selection described above and loaded for all SKU, the forecast will run for the entire packsize (aggregation across all SKU's). However to forecast individually in interactive planning, you need to load the SKU's one by one and run the forecast.
Regards,
Kedar

Fixing at aggregate level & unfixing at detailed level.

Hi,
Our requirement is as given below......
Our Demand Planning Process is Top-down process. Head Quarter will enter the demand at Territory, Channel and Product Group Level. These values are fixed and gets disaggregated to further planning level based on historical sales. The further planning levels are Sales Officer, Location & Product. Territory Manager can change the demand with in his targets across Sales officers (i.e. he should be able to change the targets of Sales officers without exceeding or reducing the Territory targets).
Can anyone suggest how to fix the keyfigures at Aggregate Level without fixing it at detailed level. We tried FIX_CALC macro, but could not resolve the issue.
Thanks in advance.
SP

You need to create AGGREGATES in your PLANNING OBJECT STRUCTURE, right click on POS and create the following aggregates
(1) ALL TERRITORY characteristics
Now you will be able to fix at the top level and still be able to change at the detailed level.
Read the following:* Let me know if you have any questions*
Aggregate
Definition
The aggregates in APO are not the same as those in the Business Information Warehouse (BW), but they have the same purpose: to speed up data access and therefore increase performance. SAP recommends that you use aggregates in Demand Planning.
These aggregates are sometimes referred to as persistent aggregates, in particular when talking about detail and aggregate levels in interactive planning.
Use
An APO aggregate contains a subset of the characteristics in the master planning object structure. The creation and use of aggregates is optional. The data is always saved on the lowest level of detail. If aggregates exist, the system saves the planning data on the defined aggregate levels as well as on the lowest level of detail. The data is saved twice, but consistently; that is, the sum of the details equals the aggregate value.
SAP recommends that the aggregates you build in APO for planning data also exist in BW for actual data.
If you want to save fixed values at aggregate level ; that is not at detail level of the master planning object structure, in a planning book, you must create aggregates for this level. Otherwise the data is only saved at detail level.
You cannot form aggregates for navigational attributes
See also:
Fixing Key Figure Values
Aggregates are discussed in detail in OSS note 503363. SAP recommends that you read this note thoroughly before configuring your master planning object structures and aggregate hierarchy.

Cost Centre creat at Controlling Areal level or Company code level???

Hi,
I have a doubt,
1. Cost center is created at controlling area level or company code level.
2. Is it possible to create at company code level.
Please update me.
We have company code field in cost center master.
If we update this field, can we use same cost center for another company code also???
Thanks
Partha

Hi Joshi,
Thanks for your inputs.
We create cost center in CO under controlling area. [In cost center master there is one filed company, its not mandatory.]
Question is - If multiple company codes assigned to one Controlling Area, in this case -
Is it possible to utilize same controlling are for multiple company codes.
You tell me if possible, how it is possible?
Thanks
Partha

Unable to create Aggregate Level on Multi Provider ( Real and Standard)

Hi all ,
I am not able to create a " Aggregate Level " on a Multi Provider. When i say create i can't see any info Objects for selections and everything is grayed out i can't select the check boxes . Any idea on what i am doing wrong ?
Is this an authorization issue ?

Hi Suresh,
Are you trying to create an aggregate on the multiprovider? This is not possible...multiprovider itself does not contain any data..

Controlling qantization levels in compressor 2?

does anyone know if there is a way to control quantization levels in compressor 2 when encoding to mpeg2?
compressor seems to use fairly high levels of quantization (typically between 12 and 30 on the material that i have analyzed).
when i encode the same material for instance with a hardware encoder, i get quantization levels that are typically between 3 and 9...
thanks

No way to control (or access) quantization levels in Compressor 2.
I'd imagine that would be like revealing (and altering) the secret sauce behind Compressor.

0FISCPER defaults automatically in the Aggregate level

Hi guys,
I have a strange situation where I have 0FISCPER, 0FISCPER3, and 0FISCYEAR in my planning cube, but I only want 0FISCPER3, and 0FISCYEAR in my aggregate level.
For some reason, when I enter the 0FISCPER3 and 0FISCYEAR in the aggregate, the system automatically inserts the 0FISCPER characteristic in there as well. The quick solution is obviously to take the 0FISCPER out of the planning cube, but I want it in the planning so it can derive the value from 0FISCPER3 and 0FISCYEAR.
If I leave 0FISCPER in the aggregate level, then the system will need a value for it during the query design (or my cells will be locked), however, I do not want it in my Query.
So how can I make the system to stop inserting 0FISCPER in my aggregate, so I only have 0FISCPER3 and 0FISCYEAR in my aggregate.
Thanks
Edited by: Ehab Mansour on Sep 18, 2008 9:43 AM

Hi,
Thanks so much for your information Gregor.
But this is all very confusing for me, this is the first time I've come across this concept of "Exception aggregation".
My situation is as follows, and let me know if you have any suggestions:
I have a IP planning cube, which is a copy of the Cost Center Activity cube. With this copy, the only time characteristics I required and kept in my planning cube, was 0FISCPER3, 0FISCYEAR, and 0FISCVARIANT, but I took OUT of the cube 0CALDAY, and 0FISCPER.
Then I created my Aggregate level in IP based on this cube. Then I did a check, and it said everything was consistent, and activated it.
Then using query designer I created a query Key figures were Activity Quantity, and row characteristics were Cost Center and Activity type. Time characteristics used were 0FISCPER3, 0FISCYEAR, and 0FISCVARIANT.
When I executed my query, I got the following message:
"Exception aggregation reference characteristic 0CALDAY not in info provider", and it seems like my query is locked, maybe as a result of this.
1) Does this mean I need 0CALDAY in the cube?
2) if the above is yes, then it will prompt me to put it in the Aggregation level as well, and if it's in the aggregation level, then it's going to expect me to give it a value in the query (otherwise it will lock), which I don't want to do.
Why does it need the 0CALDAY in the cube?
Can you suggest some options for this. Is there a way I can avoid having 0CALDAY in the cube and aggregate level? OR do I just leave it in the query, and find an SAP Exit variable that will just automatically populate this for me?
Sorry if I've repeated myself.

Cost element group authorization check on controlling area level

Hi!
When maintaining cost element groups (KAH1, KAH2, KAH3) is it possible to run an authorization check on controlling area level?
We have one global chart of account but several controlling areas. When we create a cost element group it is created at chart of account level for all the controlling areas. When someone changes a cost element group it changes in all controlling areas. I cannot restrict user's authorization to be able to change cost element groups only in their own controlling area.
Is it possible somehow?
Thanks for your help.

Hi,
Like how the global chart of accounts is at the client level, the cost element groups are also independent of the controlling areas. Infact, the cost element groups are created at the global COA level.
In such a case, I don't think it is possible to restrict the authorizations to amend the cost element groups at controlling area level.
Thanks and Regards,
Bhuvaneswari.S

I can not control volume levels with headphones

I tried lot's of models but none of them let me control volume levels. Since the xperia z 3 is a big phone and I carry it in my pocket all the time, sometimes it's really hard to reach the phone to lover or increase the music level. It's a big shame that sony doesn't think of it.... Please help me if u know any headphone models that allows volume control. Thnx

That's a great suggestion @viridis
@suffer666 you might want to consider smartweart, either a SmartWatch2 or SmartBand or SmartBand Talk or SmartWatch 3
http://www.sonymobile.com/global-en/products/smartwear/
"I'd rather be hated for who I am, than loved for who I am not." Kurt Cobain (1967-1994)

SRM 7.0 Process Controlled Workflow-Level Type in Process level config

Hello Experts,
In SRM 7.0 for Process controlled workflow,for Level Type in Process Level configuration we have 3 different options
1) Approval with Completion
2) Approval
3) Automatic(System User)
Can you plz explain what is the difference between these 3 diffrent potion for Level Type in Process Level configuration.
Your help will be highly appreciated,
Thanks & Regards,
RKS

1. Approval with completion : This allows approvers to make any changes to document while approving. Generally you define this type for buyer in SC approval.
2. Approval : above minus change
3. Automatic (system approval) : If no process level is determined, you need to set up a process level with automatic approval to approve the document by system.

0PS_C04 (CONTROLLING) aggregate level

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for