0WBS_ELEMT DTP is taking long time to finish

Hi ,
Data load from PSA to data target(0WBS_ELEMT) is taking very long time for around 1.2 lakhs data .while uploading data from source to PSA it is taking only 5 to 10 mins but from PSA to target it is taking around 2 hours where as earlier it used to take only 15 mins to finish.
There are no changes done for this object ,no increase of data volume and no corresponding transports moved to production also.
we have changed the data packet size also but it is also not resolving the issue.
can any one please tell me if you have any other options to check to resolve this issue.
Thanks in advance
Bin

Hi ,
Check whether any routines is written which is taking time to be executed.
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Uday shankar.

Similar Messages

  • DTP step taking longer time

    Hello Experts
    As Iam new to SDN I tried to find an answer to this issue. Please find below is the Issue
    There is a process chain. In this PC, After deleting the Index step, there is a DTP step, which updates the Cube with one DSO; the first DTP step is much delayed for update to cube. But where as the immediate DTP step to the same cube with another DSO is finishing so faster.
    The prob is with the first DTP step which updates the cube frm DSO In this there is one Job with the namingconvention shown as BIDTPR_545787_1 was running more than 10000sec to update the Cube. Dont know why this job is running beyond so much time, where as it usually prior to some days back completes within 3000 secs.
    Now the prob. is that the Data loading performance of the Prod system effected, where this DTP step is ruuning beyond time. Please can someone suggest how to find and resolve this issue as not sure why the below kind of JOBS are running for more time causing the PC much delayed for completion
    BIDTPR_545787_1
    BIDTPR_545689_1 etc of the First DTP are running longer. Pls help!
    Regards
    MD

    Hi
    There could have been many reasons like
    during that particular DTP is scheduled,there will not be neough work processors,this is due to the some other long running loads/jobs are running and which would have been occupied.hence during this DTP runs,parallely crosscheck in SM12,SM50&SM51.
    And also check that particular job in SM37 and understand where does its taking more time.
    There could have been expensive select statement,if any routines used in the transformations.
    Try to find out this.
    Regards
    Jagadish

  • Script is taking long time to finish...Need Optimization Suggestion.

    Hi All:
    I have written below script and this script is successfully executing and deriving the correct results. But this script is taking 4 hours to complete, can you please suggest on how to improve its performance. The requirement is to run this script is less than an hour.
    Any suggestion will be of great help for me . Thanks, UB
    SET UPDATECALC OFF;
    SET CLEARUPDATESTATUS OFF;
    SET LOCKBLOCK HIGH;
    SET CALCPARALLEL 7;
    SET CREATEBLOCKONEQ ON;
    FIX (@RELATIVE("Calculated Amounts",0), @RELATIVE("Projects",0),@RELATIVE("Business Units",0),@RELATIVE("Geography",0),@LIST(@RELATIVE("2008",0),@RELATIVE("2009",0),@RELATIVE("2010",0)))
    DATACOPY "Draft" TO "Plan Iteration-1";
         FIX ("Plan Iteration-1")
         CCONV "CurrentMonth"->"EUR";
    ENDFIX
    DATACOPY "Plan Iteration-1" TO "Plan Iteration-2";
    ENDFIX
    ENDFIX

    I am not sure if it would make a difference since SET COPYMISSINGBLOCK OFF suppresses the creation of missing blocks during copy of data from a dense dimension.
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12825_01/epm.111/esb_techref/set_copymissingblock.htm

  • Process Chain taking long time in loading data in infocube

    Dear Expert,
      We are loading data thru PC in AR cube it takes data frm
    PSA-> DSO->Activation->Index Deletion->DTP(load infocube)->IndexCreation->Create Aggregates.
    In Index creation everyday its taking long time around 9 to 10 hrs to create it
    when we go in RSRV and repair the infocube thr loading of data happens fast. We are doing it(RSRV) everyday. In DB02 we have seen dat 96% tablespace is used.
    Please tell permanent solution.
    Please suggest its BI Issue or Basis.
    Regards,
    Ankit

    Hi ,
    We are loading data thru PC in AR cube it takes data frm
    PSA-> DSO->Activation->Index Deletion->DTP(load infocube)->IndexCreation->Create Aggregates.
    In the above steps insted of Create Aggregates it should be Roll up Process of aggregates.
    You can ask the basis team to check the Table space in the transaction db02old/db02.
    Check if there is long running job in SM66/SM50 kill that job.
    check there should be enough Batch process to perform the steps.
    Hope this helps.
    "Assigning points is the ways to say thanks on SDN".
    Br
    Alok

  • Cisco WS-C6513 taking long time to save the configuration

    HI,
    cisco WS-C6513 taking long time to save the configuration.
    Any ideas?
    Thank you 

    Hello,
    do you have correct dial plan ? It very depends on the country you live and you have your VoIP operator.
    Try to finish your dialing with # - this may speed it up.

  • I am extracting the data from ECC To bw .but Data Loading taking long tim

    Hi All,
                     i am extracting the data from ECC To BI Syatem..but Data Loading Taking Long time. from last   6 hoursinfopackage is running.still it is showing yellow.Manually i made the red.and delete again i applied repeat of the last delta.but same proble is coming .in the status job is showing bckground job is not finished at source system.we requested to basis.basis people killed that job.again we schedule the chain also again same problem is coming.how can i solve this issue.
    Thanks ,
    chandu

    Hi,
    There are different places to track your job. Once your job is triggered in BW, you can track your load job where exactly it is taking more time and why. Follow below steps:
    1) After InfoPackage is triggered, then take the request number and go to source system to check your extraction job status.
    You can get the job status by taking the request number from BW and go to transaction SM37 in ECC. Then give the request number with begining '' and ending ''.  Also give '*' to user name.
    Job name:  REQ_XXXXXX
    User Name: *
    Check the job status whether job is completed or cancelled or short dump. If the job is still running check in SM66 whether you can see any process. If not accordingly you got to check in ST22 or SM21 in ECC. If the job is complete, then the same in BW side now.
    2) Check the data arrived in PSA, if not check whether Transfer routines or start routines are having bad SQL or code. Similarly in update rules.
    3) Once it is through in Source system (ECC), Transfer rules , Update Rules, then the next task is updating the data might some time take more time which might be based on some parameters ( Number of parallel process to update database ). Check whether updating the database is taking more time and may be you got to check with the DBA guy also.
    At all the times you should see minimum of atleast once process running all the time in SM66 till the time your job gets complete. If not you will see a log in ST22.
    Let me know if you still have questions.
    Assigning points is the only way of saying thanks in SDN.
    Thanks,
    Kumar.

  • DTP is taken long time

    Hi Experts,
    I am having problems to load data from the PSA to Infocube, this process takes long time. The amount of registries is 15.000.000, and the transformation rule does not have start routine or end routine. It only has three ruless with routines where assigns 0FISCYEAR and 0FISCPER3 from 0FISCPER. Also there is a routine that has ABAP code (a simple IF). There is some way to optimize it?
    Greetings,
    Leonel

    Hi,
    From your description it doesn't seem like it is due to ABAP code. It may be due to the number range buffer. Two steps to tackle this,
    1) Go to DTP monitor you will find on which step this is taking long time like is it Start routine,trasnformation,rule or End routine etc.
    2) If package size in the DTP is 50,000 reduce it to aroung 20,000.This will help to improve the speed definetly.
    3) Refer to below blog for more information regarding number range,
    /people/vikash.agrawal/blog/2006/04/05/load-lots-of-data-147faster148-with-buffering-number-range
    Let me know if you need more inforation,
    Regards,
    Viren

  • SSRS Reports taking long time to load

    Hello,
    Problem : SSRS Reports taking long time to load
    My System environment : Visual Studio 2008 SP1  and SQL Server 2008 R2
    Production Environment : Visual Studio 2008 SP1  and SQL Server 2008 R2
    I have created a Parameterized report (6 parameters), it will fetch data from 1 table. table has 1 year and 6 months data,      I am selecting parameters for only 1 month (about 2500 records). It is taking almost 2 minutes and 30 seconds
    to load the report.
    This report running efficiently in my system (report load takes only 5 to 6 seconds) but in
    production it is taking 2 minutes 30 seconds.
    I have checked the Execution log from production so I found the timing for
    Data retrieval (approx~)       Processing (approx~)               Rendering (approx~)
    10 second                                      15 sec                        
                2 mins and 5 sec.
    But Confusing point is that , if I run the same report at different time overall output time is same (approx) 2 min 30 sec but
    Data retrieval (approx~)       Processing (approx~)                Rendering (approx~)
    more than 1 min                            15 sec                                     
    more than 1 min
    so 1 question why timings are different ?
    My doubts are
    1) If query(procedure to retrieve the data) is the problem then it should take more time always,
    2) If Report structure is problem then rendering will also take same time (long time)
    for this (2nd point) I checked on blog that Rendering depends on environment structure e.g. Network bandwidth, RAM, CPU Usage , Number of users accessing same report at a time.
    So I did testing of report when no other user working on any report But failed (same result  output is 2 min 30 sec)
    From network team I got the result is that there is no issue or overload in CPU usage or RAM also No issue in Network bandwidth.
    Production Database Server and Report server are different (but in same network).
    I checked that database server the SQL Server is using almost Full RAM (23 GB out of 24 GB)
    I tried to allocate the memory to less amount up to 2GB (Trial solution I got from Blogs) but this on also failed.
    one hint I got from colleague that , change the allocated memory setting from static memory to dynamic to SQL Server
    (I guess above point is the same) I could not find that option Static and Dynamic memory setting.
    I did below steps
    Connected to SQL Server Instance
    Right click on Instance go to properties, Go to Memory Tab
    I found three options 1) Server Memory   2) Other memory   3) Section for "Configured values and Running values"
    Then I tried to reduce Maximum  Server memory up to 2 GB (As mentioned above)
    All trials failed, this issue I could not find the roots for this issue.
    Can anyone please help (it's bit urgent).

    Hi UdayKGR,
    According to your description, your report takes too long to load on your production environment. Right?
    In this scenario, since the report runs quickly in developing environment, we initially think it supposed to be the issue on data retrieval. However, based on the information in execution log, it takes longest time on rendering part. So we suggest you optimize
    the report itself to reduce the time for rendering. Please refer to the link below:
    My report takes too long to render
    Here is another article about overall performance optimization for Reporting Services:
    Reporting Services Performance and Optimization
    If you have any question, please feel free to ask.
    Best Regards,
    Simon Hou

  • Connecting to the database taking long time to connect database server

    Hi
    When I execute procedure i am getting the below message at bottom of the Oracle SQL Developer
    "Connecting to the database"
    it is taking more than 10 min plz guide

    Hi
    have you installed a normal Oracle Client also on your Host? normal Oracle Client
    Did you connect with host:port:sid or with a Oracle Naming Service? through TNS Service
    Can you test tnsping <alias> yes, It is working fine
    Did other user have the same problem? yes
    Did you connect through WAN or LAN connection? LAN (Intranet)
    Can you tell more about you client/database setup?
    Database setup:
    OS: Window 2008 server
    version: 11.1.0
    Client: 11.1.0
    OS: Window 2008 server
    Now I am not able to execute single select query which table contains 6 records and 15 columns it is taking long time I have waited 30 min still no resutls
    only one table is behaving like this remaining is working fine
    Edited by: user9235224 on Oct 6, 2012 7:06 PM

  • The ODS activation is taking long time

    Hi,
    We are on SAP NetWeaver BI 701 (Support Package 5).
    We create a Z ODS, it will contain a lot of data (180.000.000 month-end) and we want to generate specific reports about it.
    The activation is taking long time, I assume is because we checked the flag "SIDs Generation upon Activation". I am confused about this check. I really need it? is this check the only problem.
    Thanks for you help.
    Victoria

    Hi Victoria:
       If your Z DSO is used only for staging purposes (you don't have queries based on this DSO and you send the data to another DSO or to an InfoCube) then you don't need to check the "SIDs Generation Upon Activation" box.
    Even more, to achieve better performance during data loads in this scenario, you might consider using a Write Optimized DSO instead of a Standard DSO, but if you decide to take this alternative don't forget to select the "Do Not check Uniqueness of Data" box if you need to write several records with the same Semantic Key.
    Regards,
    Francisco Milán.

  • F4 Help is taking long time

    Hi All,
    We are working on BI 7.0. version
    In the varaible pop-up screen we have two info objects.
    1. Fiscal year Period
    2. JOA(Joint operating aggriment)
    If u press F4 for JOA, it is taking long time to execute and finally the application is getting closed.same situation is there in RSRT also.
    If i enter with out JOA the query is giving the output. Here i have to restrict the query by JOA.
    i have changed the JOA peroperties in query designer.
    Query execution for filter value selection = Values in master data table.......
    but still the situation is the same.......
    Could you please suggest any solution for this.....
    Thanks & Regards,
    PK

    Hi Kamal,
    You can set that at the query level in the query designer for each query.
    1. Select the corresponding characteristic in the query designer.
    2. Goto to the "Extended tab" in the properties
    3. Select the "Values in the Master data table" in the "Query execution in the filter value selection.
    Also see some recomendations:
    Note 748623 - Input help (F4) has a very long runtime - recommendations
    Hope this helps.
    CK

  • Update ztable is taking long time

    Hi All,
    i have run the 5 jobs with the same program at a time but when we check the db trace
    zs01 is taking long time as shown below.here zs01 is having small amount of data.
    in the below dbtrace for updating zs01 is taking 2,315,485 seconds .how to reduce this?
    HH:MM:SS.MS Duration     Program   ObjectName  Op.   Curs   Array   Rec     RC     Conn     
    2:36:15 AM     2,315,485     SAPLZS01  ZS01       FETCH  294     1     1     0     R/3     
    The code as shown below
    you can check the code in the program SAPLZS01 include LZS01F01.
    FORM UPDATE_ZS01.
    IF ZS02-STATUS = '3'.
        IF Z_ZS02_STATUS = '3'.            "previous status is ERROR
          EXIT.
        ELSE.
          SELECT SINGLE FOR UPDATE * FROM  ZS01
                 WHERE  PROC_NUM    = ZS02-PROC_NUM.
          CHECK SY-SUBRC = 0.
          ADD ZS02-MF_AMT TO ZS01-ERR_AMT.
          ADD 1           TO ZS01-ERR_INVOI.
          UPDATE ZS01.
        ENDIF.
      ENDIF.
    my question is when updating the ztable why it is taking such long time,
    how to reduce the time or how to make faster to update the ztable .
    Thanks in advance,
    regards
    Suni

    Try the code like this..
    data: wa_zs01 type zs01.
    FORM UPDATE_ZS01.
    IF ZS02-STATUS = '3'.
        IF Z_ZS02_STATUS = '3'.            "previous status is ERROR
          EXIT.
        ELSE.
          SELECT SINGLE FOR UPDATE * FROM  ZS01
                 WHERE  PROC_NUM    = ZS02-PROC_NUM.
    -- change
      CHECK SY-SUBRC = 0.
          ADD ZS02-MF_AMT TO wa_ZS01-ERR_AMT.
          ADD 1           TO wa_ZS01-ERR_INVOI.
          UPDATE ZS01 from wa_zs01.
        ENDIF.
      ENDIF.
    And i think this Select query for ZS01 is inside the ZS02 SELECT statement,
    This might also make slow process.
    If you want to make database access always use Workarea/Internal table to fetch the data
    and work with that.
    Accessing database like this or with Select.... endselect is an inefficient programming.

  • Simple query is taking long time

    Hi Experts,
    The below query is taking long time.
    [code]SELECT   FS.*
      FROM   ORL.FAX_STAGE FS
             INNER JOIN
                   ORL.FAX_SOURCE FSRC
                INNER JOIN
                   GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING GBM
                ON GBM.BU_ID = FSRC.BUID
             ON UPPER (FSRC.FAX_NUMBER) = UPPER (FS.DESTINATION)
    WHERE       FSRC.IS_DELETED = 'N'
             AND GBM.BU_ID IS NOT NULL
             AND UPPER (FS.FAX_STATUS) ='COMPLETED';[/code]
    this query is returning 1645457 records.
    [code]PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    | Id  | Operation           | Name                   | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)|
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT    |                        |   625K|   341M| 45113   (1)|
    |   1 |  HASH JOIN          |                        |   625K|   341M| 45113   (1)|
    |   2 |   NESTED LOOPS      |                        |   611 | 14664 |    22   (0)|
    |   3 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL| FAX_SOURCE             |  2290 | 48090 |    22   (0)|
    |   4 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN | GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING_BUID |     1 |     3 |     0   (0)|
    |   5 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL | FAX_STAGE              |  2324K|  1214M| 45076   (1)|
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Note
       - 'PLAN_TABLE' is old version
    15 rows selected.[/code]
    The distinct number of records in each table.
    [code]SELECT FAX_STATUS,count(*)
    FROM fax_STAGE
    GROUP BY FAX_STATUS;
    FAX_STATUS    COUNT(*)
    BROKEN          10
    Broken - New    9
    Completed    2324493
    New             20
    SELECT is_deleted,COUNT(*)
    FROM  FAX_SOURCE
    GROUP BY IS_DELETED;
    IS_DELETED COUNT(*)
    N         2290
    Y         78[/code]
    Total number of records in each table.
    [code]SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ORL.FAX_SOURCE FSRC-- 2368
    SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ORL.FAX_STAGE--2324532
    SELECT COUNT(*) FROM APPS_GLOBAL.GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING--9
    [/code]
    To improve the performance of this query I have created the following indexes.
    [code]Functional based index on UPPER (FSRC.FAX_NUMBER) ,UPPER (FS.DESTINATION) and UPPER (FS.FAX_STATUS).
    Bitmap index on FSRC.IS_DELETED.
    Normal Index on GBM.BU_ID and FSRC.BUID.
    [/code]
    But still the performance is bad for this query.
    What can I do apart from this to improve the performance of this query.
    Please help me .
    Thanks in advance.

    <I have created the following indexes.
    CREATE INDEX ORL.IDX_DESTINATION_RAM ON ORL.FAX_STAGE(UPPER("DESTINATION"))
    CREATE INDEX ORL.IDX_FAX_STATUS_RAM ON ORL.FAX_STAGE(LOWER("FAX_STATUS"))
    CREATE INDEX ORL.IDX_UPPER_FAX_STATUS_RAM ON ORL.FAX_STAGE(UPPER("FAX_STATUS"))
    CREATE INDEX ORL.IDX_BUID_RAM ON ORL.FAX_SOURCE(BUID)
    CREATE INDEX ORL.IDX_FAX_NUMBER_RAM ON ORL.FAX_SOURCE(UPPER("FAX_NUMBER"))
    CREATE BITMAP INDEX ORL.IDX_IS_DELETED_RAM ON ORL.FAX_SOURCE(IS_DELETED)
    After creating the following indexes performance got improved.
    But our DBA said that new BITMAP index at FAX_SOURCE table (ORL.IDX_IS_DELETED_RAM) can cause locks
    on multiple rows if IS_DELETED column is in use. Please proceed with detailed tests.
    I am sending the explain plan before creating indexes and after indexes has been created.
    SELECT  FS.*
    FROM  ORL.FAX_STAGE FS
                    INNER JOIN
                    ORL.FAX_SOURCE FSRC
                  INNER JOIN
                      GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING GBM
                    ON GBM.BU_ID = FSRC.BUID
                ON UPPER (FSRC.FAX_NUMBER) = UPPER (FS.DESTINATION)
    WHERE      FSRC.IS_DELETED = 'N'
              AND GBM.BU_ID IS NOT NULL
              AND UPPER (FS.FAX_STATUS) =:B1;
    --OLD without indexes
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Plan hash value: 3076973749
    | Id  | Operation          | Name                  | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time    |
    |  0 | SELECT STATEMENT    |                        |  141K|    85M| 45130  (1)| 00:09:02 |
    |*  1 |  HASH JOIN          |                        |  141K|    85M| 45130  (1)| 00:09:02 |
    |  2 |  NESTED LOOPS      |                        |  611 | 18330 |    22  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  3 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL| FAX_SOURCE            |  2290 | 59540 |    22  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  4 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN | GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING_BUID |    1 |    4 |    0  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  5 |  TABLE ACCESS FULL | FAX_STAGE              | 23245 |    13M| 45106  (1)| 00:09:02 |
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
      1 - access(UPPER("FSRC"."FAX_NUMBER")=UPPER("FS"."DESTINATION"))
      3 - filter("FSRC"."IS_DELETED"='N')
      4 - access("GBM"."BU_ID"="FSRC"."BUID")
          filter("GBM"."BU_ID" IS NOT NULL)
      5 - filter(UPPER("FS"."FAX_STATUS")=SYS_OP_C2C(:B1))
    21 rows selected.
    --NEW with indexes.
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Plan hash value: 665032407
    | Id  | Operation                        | Name                    | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time    |
    |  0 | SELECT STATEMENT                |                          |  5995 |  3986K|  3117  (1)| 00:00:38 |
    |*  1 |  HASH JOIN                      |                          |  5995 |  3986K|  3117  (1)| 00:00:38 |
    |  2 |  NESTED LOOPS                  |                          |  611 | 47658 |    20  (5)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  3 |    VIEW                          | index$_join$_002        |  2290 |  165K|    20  (5)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  4 |    HASH JOIN                    |                          |      |      |            |      |
    |*  5 |      HASH JOIN                  |                          |      |      |            |      |
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    |  6 |      BITMAP CONVERSION TO ROWIDS|                          |  2290 |  165K|    1  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  7 |        BITMAP INDEX SINGLE VALUE | IDX_IS_DELETED_RAM      |      |      |            |      |
    |  8 |      INDEX FAST FULL SCAN      | IDX_BUID_RAM            |  2290 |  165K|    8  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  9 |      INDEX FAST FULL SCAN        | IDX_FAX_NUMBER_RAM      |  2290 |  165K|    14  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 10 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN              | GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING_BUID  |    1 |    4 |    0  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  11 |  TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID    | FAX_STAGE                | 23245 |    13M|  3096  (1)| 00:00:38 |
    |* 12 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN              | IDX_UPPER_FAX_STATUS_RAM |  9298 |      |  2434  (1)| 00:00:30 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
      1 - access(UPPER("DESTINATION")="FSRC"."SYS_NC00035$")
      3 - filter("FSRC"."IS_DELETED"='N')
      4 - access(ROWID=ROWID)
      5 - access(ROWID=ROWID)
      7 - access("FSRC"."IS_DELETED"='N')
      10 - access("GBM"."BU_ID"="FSRC"."BUID")
          filter("GBM"."BU_ID" IS NOT NULL)
      12 - access(UPPER("FAX_STATUS")=SYS_OP_C2C(:B1))
    31 rows selected
    Please confirm on the DBA comment.Is this bitmap index locks rows in my case.
    Thanks.>

  • Fwrite() and fread() of a shared FAT32 formatted file is taking long time in MAC osx Lion C program

    Hi
    Is there any provision or api in MAC to open a file in shared mode same as windows
       hUSBdrive = CreateFile(pDriveName, GENERIC_READ | GENERIC_WRITE, FILE_SHARE_READ | FILE_SHARE_WRITE, NULL, OPEN_EXISTING, FILE_FLAG_NO_BUFFERING, NULL);
    we have the follwing scenario where a file is shared among two processes for read/write.one is running on Linux and the other one is running on MAC.where both the processses are reading/writing into the same memory location in the file say "X"
    FAT 32 formatted raw data file which is located on the device, is shared among two processes.
    One process is running on Linux device which is connected to MAC book through usb.In this linux process, the file is opened using fopen() and we have used fcntl() with O_DIRECT flag.This process continuously reads/writes data on memory location "X" in the shared file .
    The other process is running on Mac which has simple c program that opens the file on the connected device i.e from usb drive and reads/writes data using fread()/fwrite().fopen() is used to open the file and FILE_NOCACHE flag is used to avoid caching.
    The value at memory location "X" is updated by mac by using fwrite() and the linux process reads the memory location "X" by using fread(). Linux process is taking around 30 sec to get the updated value.
    If the value is updated by Linux process at memory location "X" by using fwrite() the MAC process is also taking long time more than a minute to read the updated value by usng fread().
    fwrite()/fread() on mac is taking long time where as the windows application which uses the same apis is taking msec time.
    Do we need to use other api s or flags to open file?
    thanks in advance.......

    does any one face this kind of problem?
    fwrite() and fread() takes long time?
    Is there any problem in read/write to a fat32 file on MAC?

  • RSPCM is taking long time

    Hi,
    RSPCM is taking long time to open at the same time RSPC is working fine
    when I try to change the process chain status through RSPC_PROCESS_FINISH . it is executing for long time no response. I tried executing it backgrond also from past 2 days it is running, no progress.
    Our basis team created index to all backend table of RSPCM, still issue persist. Please suggest me some to get rid of this.
    Br,
    Harish

    hi,
    Please check the below thread
    RSPCM T-Code was executing very slow
    Please check note 1372931
    hope it helps!
    Edited by: Lavanya J on Nov 4, 2011 1:32 PM

Maybe you are looking for