0x80070035 Across WAN between Windows 2012/8 Computers

Head scratcher on this one. Network Shares/Servers running Windows 2012 are unaccessible across the WAN but only When it is a Windows 2012 or 8 client. Here is a basic view of what is happening;
If User in NoCal tried to access information from a Windows 8.1 machine to any share on a Windows 2012 R2 Server located in SoCal, you get
"Windows cannot access \\SoCal2012" and the error is
0x80070035. If the same user tries to get information from a SoCal Windows 2008 R2 server, success. If that same NoCal user tries from a Windows 7 computer, to either a 2012 or 2008 server in the SoCal office, Success.
Same issue going from SoCal to NoCal with same outcomes using Windows 8 or 7 and accessing Windows 2008 or 2012 servers located in NoCal. This is also true when logged into a Windows 2012 Server and trying to access a Windows 2012 server across the WAN.
Locally there is no issue. Windows 8 or 7 can access the local servers with no issues.
Some of the things I've looked at was the NetBIOS over TCP/IP, Firewall settings for Domain, Private and Public, RequireSecuritySignature on SMB. Looked into Audit Policy for removable storage and Object access. Now I am posting here. It seemed to be working
for a minute lastnight before I left work, and the issue is back this morning.
Any help solving this riddle would be appreciated.

Hi,
Above all I would like to know if it is a DNS resolution related issue.
As you are accessing server via NetBIOS name, please make sure that DNS suffix is displayed correctly in Advanced TCP/IP settings.
Also you can try an nslookup, or accessing the server with FQDN (\\server.domain.com) to see the result.
SMB negotiation could also cause issue. If this is the case you will need to capture a package with Network Monitor to get the connection process. Find the package with error and let us know the exact information.
Detailed information could be found:
Microsoft SMB Protocol Packet Exchange Scenario
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa365236(v=vs.85).aspx
And this is the article for using Network Monitor to capture network traffic. You can upload your package to an online storage such as OneDrive - Please note the package could be accessed by anyone so it is fine if you do not willing to share it online.
How to use Network Monitor to capture network traffic
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/812953/en-us
If you have any feedback on our support, please send to [email protected]

Similar Messages

Cross Domain authentication between Windows 2012 R2 domains

Hello,
I am trying to figure out if this is possible.
We have 2 companies that have a VPN between them.
I can ping their PCs and access their servers by name no issues.
What I am trying to do is setup a cross domain authentication.
So their credentials can be authenticated without creating an account for them on a local network. (and vise versa)
This way on our domain I can create share and they will be able to access it without needing to logon without different credentials.
Thank you.

We have Meraki with Site to Site VPN.
Site-to-site firewall
Policy
Protocol
Source
Src port
Destination
Dst port
Comment
Actions
<tfoot>
Allow
Any
Any
Any
Any
Any
Default rule
</tfoot>
Add a rule
So as you can tell we don't block anything at all.

Exporting and Importing Virtual servers with Windows 2012 R2 Hyper V

Hi
We are looking for various options / best practice in exporting and importing VSs between Windows 2012 R2 servers. Live migration we tested between servers in same VLAN and it's fine, but some servers are in different VLAN and hardware firewall is there
in between. So we exported the VS and while importing it, there is no option to export each Virtual disk to separate partitions / LUNs. Is it fine to create a new VS in the new server and just copy the VDs from the other HV host server, or exporting and importing
is the only proper method?
Thanks in advance
LMS

Hi Laljeev,
Please allow me to state my understanding of the two methods :
1.when you want to copy vhd you may need to shutdown the VM , further more if there is some snapshots I think it will be a trouble .
2. "export" you still need to shutdown VM but it doesn't have the trouble with snapshots .
The other way I will use is , "move" all of the VM's data to external disk then import it into destination hyper-v server (it can decrease the off-line time of VMs).
Best Regards
Elton Ji
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Elton, in Windows Server 2012 R2, we do not need to show down the VM to export it via the Hyper-V Manager GUI or Powershell...
Sam Boutros, Senior Consultant, Software Logic, KOP, PA http://superwidgets.wordpress.com (Please take a moment to Vote as Helpful and/or Mark as Answer, where applicable) _________________________________________________________________________________
Powershell: Learn it before it's an emergency http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/scriptcenter/powershell.aspx http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/scriptcenter/dd793612.aspx

Windows 2012: Error: No computers available in the pool.

I've got a russian versions of all the components I am talking about. But I got no help on Russian Forum so I translated my question to English to post it here. So, messages from logs are translated back to English from Russian and they may look different
to what you get in English version (not translated to Russian and then back to English).
I have got two physical servers with Windows 2012 Server installed on them, one of them is Domain Controller, the other server got Remote Desktop roles: RD Connection Broker, RD Web Access and RD Virtualization Host. I
use Hyper-V to create Virtual Machines on the second Server (server with RD roles installed).
I have created 2 collections: one Personal and one Pooled. Template
machine used for both collections is a sysprepped clean install of Windows 8.1 Pro. I connect to collections through RDP file I am getting from RD Web Access.
When I connect to Pooled Collection everything is going fine but when I attempt to connect to Personal Collection
I am getting Error "There are no computers available in the pool. Try to connect later or contact Administrator."
At that moment in Server log [translated by me from russian]:
VDI
1306
Error
Microsoft-Windows-TerminalServices-SessionBroker-Client
Microsoft-Windows-TerminalServices-SessionBroker-Client/Operational
Connection Broker Client failed to redirect user domain\user.
Error: NULL
VDI
1296
Error
Microsoft-Windows-TerminalServices-SessionBroker-Client
Microsoft-Windows-TerminalServices-SessionBroker-Client/Operational
On getting a redirection packet from Connection Broker an error occured in Connection Broker Client.
Пользователь: domain\user
Error: Element not found.
VDI
802
Error
Microsoft-Windows-TerminalServices-SessionBroker
Microsoft-Windows-TerminalServices-SessionBroker/Admin
Connection Broker failed to process a connection request for user domain\user. Failed to perform load balancing OR end point not found.
Error: Access denied.
VDI
804
Error
Microsoft-Windows-TerminalServices-SessionBroker
Microsoft-Windows-TerminalServices-SessionBroker/Admin
Connection Broker failed to find a personal virtual desktop assigned to user domain\user. HRESULT = 0x80070005
I have tried using different options of AutoAssignPersonalDesktop
(manual and automatic assignment), reinstalling the RD roles and even reinstalling the server with RD roles. Nothing helps. Errors remain the same.
I was using official guides when I installed RD roles on the server.

Hi,
Thank you for posting in windows Server Forum.
From the error description it seems that broker connection is not established well and also there might be some permission issue with user and groups. Please verify that RDSH can communicate with RDCB servers well.
Remote Desktop Connection Broker (RD Connection Broker), formerly Terminal Services Session Broker, is a Remote Desktop Services role service in Windows Server 2008 R2 that supports session load balancing between RD Session Host servers in a farm, connections
to virtual desktops, and reconnection to an existing session in a load-balanced RD Session Host server farm.
Event ID 1296 — RD Connection Broker Communication
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee891061(v=ws.10).aspx
Also you can check how the connection works from “A user is connected to a personal virtual desktop in the following way” this part from below article.
Deploying Personal Virtual Desktops by Using Remote Desktop Web Access Step-by-Step Guide
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd883277(v=ws.10).aspx
Hope it helps!
Thanks.
Dharmesh Solanki
TechNet Community Support

Net view doesn't show all network computers in Windows 2012 R2

We have Symantec Endpoint v12 running on Windows 2012 R2. It used to be working fine and we could see all network computers in Endpoint Protection Manager. Since last Friday, the Endpoint Protection Manger can see only two computers. If I run new view
command on the server, it also shows only these two computers. If I open Windows Explorer and then Network, I can see all network computers. The network discovery and share has been enabled. Other servers and computers don't have this problem. What could be
the issue?
Bob Lin, MCSE & CNE Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN Troubleshooting on http://www.ChicagoTech.net How to Install and Configure Windows, VMware, Virtualization and Cisco on http://www.HowToNetworking.com

rebooting the server fixes the problem.
Bob Lin, MCSE & CNE Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN Troubleshooting on http://www.ChicagoTech.net How to Install and Configure Windows, VMware, Virtualization and Cisco on http://www.HowToNetworking.com
yeah most of the time "rebooting" works..
Every second counts..make use of it. Disclaimer: This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights.
IT Stuff Quick Bytes

Printers in RDP Windows 2012 and Ubuntu Linux

Computer 1. Windows Server 2012 Std with RDP Terminal Server
Computer 2. Ubuntu Linux 13.04 with RDP client Remmina and HP LaserJet 1020 Printer
Computers isn't located in one local network. When I connected to the Windows by RDP - I couldnt see any printers (e.g. HP LJ 1020). What should I do to make visible my printers when I connect thru Remmina to Windows 2012 Server? May be add some components
or roles? By the way, when I use Windows 7 to connect to Server 2012, I could see my printer like Remote Desktop Easy Print.
Windows Server 2012 и клиент на Ubuntu не находятся в одной локальной сети, поэтому подключить принтер из под терминальной сессии по локальной сети не получится. Нужно прокидывать принтер с Ubuntu в терминальную сессию через RDP. Так вот,
если я подключаюсь из под Windows 7, то принтер виден, Easy Print отрабатывает нормально, а если из под Ubuntu, то нет ни одного принтера. Как я понял, это особенность Windows 2012, то что они отключили там устаревшие компоненты, потому
что подключаюсь к Windows 2008R2 и там принтер из Ubuntu виден.

(SOLVED) Problem with printer redirection between Ubuntu Linux 12.04 and Windows 2012R2
Server - Windows 2012R2
Clients - Linux Ubuntu 12.04/14.04
RDP client - Remmina Remote Desktop Client (Stable release: 1.0.0).
It turned out that for some strange logic in the connection settings to the server in the RDP client - Remmina must specify sound "local".
Then Printer redirection works and print remotely without problems.
Special thanks to the user with the nickname "nechik_uk" from forum.oszone.net.

Subnet config and switch layout for windows 2012 ISCSI server

I would like to ask about subnet design and switch layout in regards to using a Windows 2012 ISCSI solution. When you guys design subnets for ISCSI configurations do you use one subnet or multiple subnets? Also do you link the switches together when
designing your ISCSI layouts? These types of things are normally discussed in vendor deployment guides. However, I have not come across a best practices guide for deploying Server 2012 ISCSI.

I would like to ask about subnet design and switch layout in regards to using a Windows 2012 ISCSI solution. When you guys design subnets for ISCSI configurations do you use one subnet or multiple subnets? Also do you link the switches together
when designing your ISCSI layouts? These types of things are normally discussed in vendor deployment guides. However, I have not come across a best practices guide for deploying Server 2012 ISCSI.
For iSCSI you typically create a separate subnets around physical NICs you use for iSCSI traffic (assuming they are used by iSCSI target for MPIO of course). Here are few guides on how to do that (some for Windows Server 2008 R2 but you can ignore that fact
as target itself did not change much and concepts are still the same). See:
Configure iSCSI MPIO on Windows (full)
http://blogs.technet.com/b/migreene/archive/2009/08/29/3277914.aspx
(make sure you have at leas one connection before you try to enable MPIO)
Setting up a Target and Initiator
http://www.server-log.com/blog/2011/7/26/setting-up-an-microsoft-iscsi-target-and-initiator-using-mpi.html
You need however be aware of a couple of facts...
1) MSFT does not see much future in iSCSI and is replacing it with SMB3 where it can. So if you want to use iSCSI to provide shared storage to your guest VMs you need to use shared VHDX hosted on SMB3 share, see:
Shared VHDX for guest VM Cluster
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn265980.aspx
If you plan to use iSCSI to host CSV and VM images there you again can use SMB3 share, see:
Hyper-V over SMB
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj134187.aspx
That's both simpler to manage (you don't configure anything except teaming for NICs to enable SMB Multichannel and create a shared folder in a few clicks) and faster: MSFT iSCSI target is not cached @ server side while (OK, Hyper-V ovens VMs in a pass-thru
mode but other users typically don't do that). SQL Server is the same as Hyper-V in terms of SMB3 support, Windows clusters support SMB3 share as a witness and so on.
2) That's a single point of failure. Think about using SoFS instead of a single SMB3 share and think about clustering your target (you'll need a separate fault tolerant back end of that) to increase uptime. See:
MSFT iSCSI Target Failover Cluster
http://techontip.wordpress.com/2011/05/03/microsoft-iscsi-target-cluster-building-walkthrough/
Good luck! :)
StarWind VSAN [Virtual SAN] clusters Hyper-V without SAS, Fibre Channel, SMB 3.0 or iSCSI, uses Ethernet to mirror internally mounted SATA disks between hosts.

Using IPSec to connect from Windows 2012 to a Sonicwall

In order to establish an IPSec connect from a Windows 2012 Server to a SonicWall, you must first connect to the sonic wall via L2TP or PPTP?
Can someone confirm this is correct?
Thanks.

Hi,
Thank you for posting in Windows Server Forum.
As per my research, generally when we are implementing IPsec connection we use PPTP as a connection method. PPTP, L2TP, and SSTP depend heavily on the features originally specified for Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP). PPP was designed to send data across dial-up
or dedicated point-to-point connections. For IP, PPP encapsulates IP packets within PPP frames and then transmits the encapsulated PPP-packets across a point-to-point link. PPP was originally defined as the protocol to use between a dial-up client and a network
access server.
More information.
VPN Tunneling Protocols
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc771298(v=ws.10).aspx
Hope it helps!
Thanks.
Dharmesh Solanki
TechNet Community Support

Can A Windows 2000 Client Join A Windows 2012 Domain ?

I have set up a Server 2012 VM that I have configured as a DC. The desktop environment consists of Windows 7, Windows XP and a few Windows 2000 machines. All desktops can JOIN the 2012 domain, but when I try to add domain users to any of the
Windows 2000 (SP4) workstations, it fails with the error "The trust relationship between this workstation and the primary domain failed".
Unjoining the workstation from the domain (or going into ADUC and deleting the Win 2000 computer from the domain) and trying again yields the same result. I do not have this problem when the Windows 2000 machines are joined to a Server 2008 R2 domain.
At this point, I'm leaning towards setting it up as a 2008 R2 DC, and moving to a 2012 DC once we have weaned ourselves off of the Windows 2000 desktops. Is there any hope of getting things to work with a 2012 DC from the start ?

Hi,
Based on my research, Windows 2000 client is not supported for Windows 2012 DC.
Windows client and Windows Server operating systems that are supported to join Windows Server 2012 domains
The following Windows client and Windows Server operating systems are supported for domain member computers with domain controllers that run Windows Server 2012:
Client operating systems: Windows 8, Windows 7, Windows Vista, Windows XP
Computers that run Windows 8 are also able to join domains that have domain controllers that run earlier version of Windows Server, including Windows Server 2003 or later. In this case however, some Windows 8 features may require additional configuration or
may not be available. For more information about those features and other recommendations for managing Windows 8 clients in downlevel domains, see
Running Windows 8 member computers in Windows Server 2003 domains.
Server operating systems: Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2003 R2, Windows Server 2003
Cataleya Li
TechNet Community Support

Windows 2012 Nodes - Slow CSV Performance - Need help to resolve my iSCSI issue configuration

I spent weeks going over the forums and the net for any publications and advice on how to optimize iSCSI connections and i'm about to give up. I really need some help in determining if its something i'm not configuring right or maybe its an equipment
issue.
Hardware:
2x Windows 2012 Hosts with 10 Nics (same NIC configuration) in a Failover Cluster sharing a CSV LUN.
3x NICs Teamed for Host/Live Migration (192.168.0.x)
2x NICS teamed for Hyper-V Switch 1 (192.168.0.x)
1x NIC teamed for Hyper-V Switch 2 (192.168.10.x)
4x NICs for iSCSI traffic (192.168.0.x, 192.168.10.x, 192.168.20.x 192.168.30.x)
Jumbo frames and flow control turned on all the NICs on the host. IpV6 disabled. Client for Microsoft Network, File/Printing Sharing Disabled on iSCSI NICs.
MPIO Least Queue selected. Round Robin gives me an error message saying "The parameter is incorrect. The round robin policy attempts to evenly distribute incoming requests to all processing paths. "
Netgear ReadyNas 3200
4x NICs for iSCSI traffic ((192.168.0.x, 192.168.10.x, 192.168.20.x 192.168.30.x)
Network Hardware:
Cisco 2960S managed switch - Flow control on, Spanning Tree on, Jumbo Frames at 9k - this is for the .0 subnet
Netgear unmanaged switch - Flow control on, Jumbo Frames at 9k - this is for .10 subnet
Netgear unmanaged switch - Flow control on, Jumbo Frames at 9k - this is for .20 subnet
Netgear unmanaged switch - Flow control on, Jumbo Frames at 9k - this is for .30 subnet
Host Configuration (things I tried turning on and off):
Autotuning
RSS
Chimney Offload
I have 8 VMs stored in the CSV. When try to load all 8 up at the same time, they bog down.  Each VM loads very slowly and when they eventually come up, most of the important services did not start. I have to load
them up 1 or 2 at a time. Even then the performance is nothing like if they were loading up on the Host itself (VHD stored on the host's hdd). This is what prompted me to add in more iSCSI connections to see if I can improve the VM's
performance.  Even with 4 iSCSI connections, I feel nothing has changed. The VMs still start up slowly and services do not load right. If I distribute the load with 4 VMs on Host 1 and 4 VMs on Host 2, the load up
times do not change.
As a manual test for file copy speed, I moved the cluster resources to Host 1 and copied a VM from the CSV and onto the Host.   The speed would start out around 250megs/sec and then eventually drop down to about 50/60 megs/sec. If I turn
off all iSCSI connections except one, it get the same speed. I can verify from the Windows Performance Tab under Task Manager that all the NICS are distributing traffic evenly, but something is just limiting the flow. Like what I stated on top,
I played around with autotuning, RSS and chimney offload and none of it makes a difference.
The VMs have been converted to VHDx and to fixed size. That did not help.
Is there something I'm not doing right? I am working with Netgear support and they are puzzled as well. The ReadyNas device should easily be able to handle it.
Please help! I pulled my hair out over this for the past two months and I'm about to give up and just ditch clustering all together and just run the VMs off the hosts themselves.
George

A few things...
For starters, I recommend opening a case with Microsoft support. They will be able to dig in and help you...
Turn on the CSV Cache, it will boost your performance
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/clustering/archive/2012/03/22/10286676.aspx
A file copy has no resemblance of the unbuffered I/O a VM does... so don't use that as a comparison, as you are comparing apples to oranges.
Do you see any I/O performance difference between the coordinator node and the non-coordinator nodes? Basically, see which node owns the cluster Physical Disk resource... measure the performance. Then move the Physical Disk resource for the
CSV volume to another node, and repeat the same measure of performance... then compare them.
Your IP addressing seems odd... you show multiple networks on 192.168.0.x and also on 192.168.10.x.   Remember that clustering only recognizes and uses 1 logical interface per IP subnet. I would triple check all your IP schemes...
to ensure they are all different logical networks.
Check you binding order
Make sure you NIC drivers and NIC firmware are updated
Make sure you don't have IPsec enabled, that will significantly impact your network performance
For the iSCSI Software Initiator, when you did your connection... make sure you didn't do a 'Quick Connect'... that will do a wildcard and connect over any network. You want to specify your dedicated iSCSI network
No idea what the performance capabilities of the ReadyNas is... this could all likely be associated with the shared storage.
What speed NIC's are you using?   I hope at least 10 GB...
Hope that helps...
Elden
Hi Elden,
2. CSV is turned on, I have 4GB dedicated from each host to it. With IOmeter running within the VMs, I do see the read speed jumped up 4-5x fold but the write speed stays the same (which according to the doc it should). But even with the read
speed that high, the VMs are not starting up quickly.
4. I do not see any difference with IO with coordinator and non coordinator nodes.
5. I'm not 100% sure what your saying about my IPs. Maybe if I list it out, you can help explain further.
Host 1 - 192.168.0.241 (Host/LM IP), Undefined IP on the 192.168.0.x network (Hyper-V Port 1), Undefined IP on the 192.168.10.x network (Hyper- V port 2), 192.168.0.220 (iSCSI 1), 192.168.10.10 (iSCSI2), 192.168.20.10(iSCSI 3), 192.168.30.10 (iSCSI 4)
The Hyper-V ports are undefined because the VMs themselves have static ips.
0.220 host NIC connects with the .231 NIC of the NAS
10.10 host NIC connects with the 10.100 NIC of the NAS
20.10 host NIC connects with the 20.100 NIC of the NAS
30.10 host NIC connects with the 30.100 NIC of the NAS
Host 2 - 192.168.0.245 (Host/LM IP), Undefined IP on the 192.168.0.x network (Hyper-V Port 1), Undefined IP on the 192.168.10.x network (Hyper- V port 2), 192.168.0.221 (iSCSI 1), 192.168.10.20 (iSCSI2), 192.168.20.20(iSCSI 3), 192.168.30.20 (iSCSI 4)
The Hyper-V ports are undefined because the VMs themselves have static ips.
0.221 host NIC connects with the .231 NIC of the NAS
10.20 host NIC connects with the 10.100 NIC of the NAS
20.20 host NIC connects with the 20.100 NIC of the NAS
30.20 host NIC connects with the 30.100 NIC of the NAS
6. Binding orders are all correct.
7. Nic drivers are all updated. Didn't check the firmware.
8. I do not know about IPSec...let me look into it.
9. I did not do quick connect, each iscsi connection is defined using a specific source ip and specific target ip.
These are all 1gigabit nics, which is the reason why I have so many NICs...otherwise there would be no reason for me to have 4 iscsi connections.

Lync 2010 Voice & Video Support on Windows 2012 R2 SP1 RDSH & RDVH

Hello - We have successfully demonstrated RDSH & RDVH using Windows 2012 R2, Windows 8 virtual desktops and Dell T10 Zero clients. RemoteFX has been successfully tested as well for Printing across RDSH & RDVH environments.
Problem at hand is that we are unable to showcase Lync 2010 Voice & Video calling across both these environments (RDSH & RDVH).
RDSH Environment
In an RDSH environment, we observe that a Platronics headset connected to the Dell T10 thin client is able to get redirected to the RDSH Server using RemoteFX and in-turn the RDSH Server is able to detect the connected hardware. However, the Lync 2010 client,
published using RDSH, is UNABLE to detect the connected audio device.
As for Logitech Webcam connected to the Dell T10 thin client, we have no issues with device detection and the Lync 2010 client is able to see the connected Webcam device.
RDVH Environment (Pooled Desktop)
As for the RDVH environment, we observe that both the Platronics headset & Logitec Webcam connected to the the Dell T10 thin client are UNABLE to get redirected to the RDVH Server using RemoteFX. We have enabled RemoteFX via Group policy in this environment.
Queries:
A. Could you help providing some direction into troubleshooting/isolating the audio-device detection issue on Lync clients in an RDSH environment.
B. Could you help providing some direction into troubleshooting/isolating the audio & webcam re-direction issue in an RDVH environment. FYI, our test bed server does NOT support GPU and wanted to check if that would be a limitation towards detection
of these devices?
Thanks
Srinath
sgopalkr

Hi Dharmesh,
Thank you for a response.
We had already enabled Audio and Video playback option.
But when we have tested with windows 7 desktop machine, the audio devices are detecting in Lync client in both RDVH and RDSH
environment and we are able to make audio calls. So we are planning to test with the different thin clients. Post we will update the same.
Thanks.
Manikandan

Remote Desktop Connection Mouse Slow with Windows 2012

Hello:
I am connecting to a customer site with Citrix and using Citrix's Remote Desktop. I know this may be a Citrix issue but not sure. Customer isn't helping so thought I would check here.
I have two connections to computers in their network with Remote Desktop. One is to a Windows 2003 Server which works fine. When I connect to Windows 2012 the mouse is slow. I tried adjusting the mouse settings but it doesn't help.
Has anyone else experienced this? Is it an issue specific to Citrix or to Remote Desktop in general?
Thanks,

check out this blog, it's for virtual PC though but also using RDP.
just try it out whether it helps or not
http://mattrefghi.com/blog/solutions/virtual-pc/slow-mouse-when-controlling-a-virtual-pc-through-remote-desktop/
Slow Mouse When Controlling a Virtual PC Through Remote Desktop
Right-click the Desktop, and select Properties.
Move to the Settings tab in the Display
Properties dialog.
Click the Advanced button.
Move to the Troubleshoot tab in the Monitor
Properties dialog.
Move the Hardware acceleration slider all the way to the right, so it is right next to Full.
Click OK in the Monitor Properties dialog.
Click OK in the Display Properties dialog.
Every second counts..make use of it. Disclaimer: This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights.

Running a .cmd file at startup using Task Scheduler on Windows 2012 R2 server

Hello,
I've recently tried to get a simple .cmd file running at server startup on my Windows 2012 R2 server.
The .cmd (test.cmd) file contains the following:
C:
cd C:\SomeFolder\
call Some.exe file "Argument1" "Argument2"
I've ensured that the local administrator user [someuser01] has full control of the C:\SomeFolder
I've also ensured that someuser01 is part of Log on as Batch Job
in Local Security Policy
To try running it as startup, I tried using Task Scheduler.
General Tab: I set the user (local administrator account [someuser01] ) and ticked the options
Run whether logged on or not, Do not Store Password, Run with Highest Privileges
Triggers: At System Startup, Ticked Enabled
Actions: Start a Program. Program/Script: test.cmd, Add arguments: [Blank], Start in: C:\SomeFolder
Conditions: Unticked all conditions
Settings: Ticked only the following --> Allow task to be run on demand, If the running task does not end...force to stop
Then I clicked OK and was prompted for someuser01's credentials.
I then restarted the server.
Upon logging in as administrator, I checked the task scheduler, and I found that the task did not run (Last Run Time: Never)
I've been able to run it manually (click Run on the task in Task scheduler) without any problems.
I just cannot get it to run at startup as I've instructed Task Scheduler to do.
Any ideas on what might be causing this problem?
Thanks.

Hello Dave Patrick,
I've also tried this approach and I came across this error after I try to enter someuser01's credentials:
An error has occured for the task sometask01. Error message: The following error was reported: A specified logon session does not exist. It may already have been terminated..
After doing some research, this new error is caused by a setting in Local Security:
Local Security Policy --> Security Options --> Network Access: Do not allow storage of passwords and credentials for network authentication --> Enabled
Unfortunately, I cannot disable this Security Policy due to our company's internal restrictions.
Just to clarify, the reason that the task does not run at startup is because of a logon failure because the password was not stored for
someuser01 ?
However, I cannot allow storage of the password because of our our company's internal restrictions.
Is there a possible workaround for this..?
Thanks!

Windows 7 Client 'sees' an old version of windows 2012 server share

Hi All,
I have a problem which seems to be a common theme looking at other threads. Here's the overview of the problem:-
I have multiple windows 7 clients and a windows 8.1 client within a 2008 Server in a domain.
I also have a Windows 2012R2 Server which is not joined to the domain. There is a Share on the 2012R2 which has the Caching Option turned off. Everyone full control on Share & File permissions.
One of the Windows 7 machines in Explorer when it looks at
\\2012server\share sees an old version of the folder. It seems that SMB 2 chaching is working too well. Not even pressing F5 or clicking View, Refresh updates windows explorer.
It took a reboot to get the workstation to see the up to date contents of the share on the 2012 server.
We don't seem to have that behaviour with that client against the 2008 server.
I have seen this behaviour on another machine un-related to us at another location which was in a workgroup with a 2012 server and no domain.
Questions:-
Is there some sort of problem with Windows 7 workstations working against 2012 Servers in a non-domain setting or is it just Windows 7 against 2012 servers period?
I understand that Windows 7 utilises SMB1 & SMB2. SMB2 introduced caching. If the server has turned off the share cache option should the client cache the contents of the share or the information about the files & folders & 'file not found'
information?
I want to open a file handle to a file on a network share so I can read and write data to it. But I also want to know that when I look at the folder to open the file I'm actually looking at the live version of the folder and files in the folder and
not a cached version of the folder. If it's a cached version the file might be there already but I won't see it.
Is there an API call that tells the client to get a fresh view of the server share so I can be absolutely sure that when I look for a file on the server I'm getting the correct answer and not one from cache.
I first posted the question with the same subject "Windows 7 Client 'sees' an old version of windows 2012 server share" in the Windows 7 Networking Fourm
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/23bf3627-987b-4c27-8062-85a284a2cda4/windows-7-client-sees-an-old-version-of-windows-2012-server-share?forum=w7itpronetworking and it was suggested I repost in here. Please do take the time to read
the thread which will save time with suggestions that have already been covered.
As the computers that can be affected by this problem are not mine I cannot enforce or guarantee that any of my 'client base' will apply any hotfixes. I will also not have the ability to tweak registry settings as I can't guarantee Admin Access.
It seems that we need to go back to SMB1 as all the tweaks to SMB since those days have introduced problems with the basic requirement of sharing files from a share on a server for Read/Write purposes. I have tried turning a network back to SMB1 and that
has resolved a lot of the issues but then I found a post/MS blog that states not to leave the network on SMB1
The Caching option of the share had already been turned off. Surely Windows clients should not cache any information about the share but I think that is not the case.
Thanks is advance
Robert

Hi Shaon,
Thanks for looking into this.
If this is a known issue, why isn't the hotfix rolled into a general windows update if this is a known problem? However this doesn't just affect domain joined workstations.
Surely it's basic functionality for a networked computer to access files and folders on a network file server. It's what networks were invented for at the end of the day.
I am unable to apply hotfixes to these computers that are having the problem due to the fact they are not mine but my customers.
At one of my customers sites I disabled SMB2 from the server and network clients as well as disabling the network adapter power saving option. This seemed to resolve the issues that I saw on one client that seemed to be 30 minutes behind the rest of
the network. The hotfix you link to states that it is for Domain joined computers. At my customer site the PC's are not in a domain at all, just a workgroup with workstations and a 2012r2 server. Will the hotfix be applicable to non-domain machines?
Also many clients seemed to loose the file handle to an open file on the server. I'll get them to turn SMB2 back on at some point after I send out some updates but all the problems I see seem to be caused by the caching functions in SMB2. SMB1 is good and
stable. It's SMB2 that seems to be causing the problems as it was designed from the ground up for caching.
Has this networking issue been resolved in Windows 8, 8.1 and 10?
As I am unable to apply a hotfix to 1000's of PC's that are not mine, is there an API call or something where I can get the windows client to stop lying and get me the current state of a folder on the server?
Will Turning off ClientSideCaching fix the issue? HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\MrxSmb\Parameters\
CSCEnabled
Or will every machine need to be tuned individually according to the following guide:-
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/7bd9978c-69b4-42bf-90cd-fc7541ccb663/forum-faq-troubleshooting-network-file-copy-slowness?forum=winserverPN ?
Robert

Windows 2012 R2 - Remote Desktop Sessions, RemoteFX, GPU, Blue Screen RemoteFX adaptor

Nvidia GPU GRID K1
Host Server - Dell Power edge R720 128 gig RAM 2 Xeon E5-2640v2 2.0GHz, 20M cache 8c
Windows 2012 R2 full installation – Bios and all hardware with latest updates.
Roles - Hyper V and Remote Desktop Virtualization Host
EPT, GPU, WDDM (latest drivers) compatible for RemoteFX and fully up to date.
I have disabled the video adaptor on the motherboard.
I cannot complete with administrative permissions;
dism /online /enable-feature /featurename:Microsoft-Windows-RemoteFX-EmbeddedVideoCap-Setup-Package
Error: 0x800f080c
Feature name Microsoft-Windows-RemoteFX-EmbeddedVidoCap-Setup-Package is unknown
Question 1 - because video card on motherboard disabled, do I still need to complete this command?
VM’s
**I’m not interested in VDI but more Remote Desktop Sessions and the option to ‘pinch and zoom with Windows 8.1 tablets**
VM1 - Windows 2012 R2 configured as generation 1 that is fully patched.
This VM is able to start up and run until I add the new hardware for the RemoteFX Video adaptor from within the Hyper V settings. When I start the VM the server blue screens. I have tried multiple VM’s with 2012 but same thing
If I created the VM as Generation 2 I am able to start the VM but the RemoteFX adaptor doesn’t appear in the device manager. I have read generation 2 isn’t compatible with RemoteFX.
VM2 – *Testing purposes* - Windows 8.1 Enterprise configured as generation 1 that is fully patched.
This VM I am able to start up and run the VDI after the RemoteFX video adaptor is installed, also the correct adaptor appears in the device manager. This seems to at least work correctly but I cannot pinch and zoom and the experience is poor.
GPU summary within the Hyper V settings state there are 4 physical GPU’s all of which can be used with RemoteFX and that 1 virtual machine are using the GPU (Windows 8.1 enterprise VM)
Firewalls off, latest RDP clients
I have read you should be able to use Windows 2012 R2 and we should be able to use the sessions with pinch and zoom but now and then you come across something that tells me different.
Question 2 – I need this to work with Windows 2012 R2 so we can use Remote Desktop Sessions
and the tablets can use pinch and zoom, anyone tell me what I may be doing wrong?

Hi,
Thank you for posting in Windows Server Forum.
As per my research, you need to run the command although video adapter is disabled on motherboard. If you install the RemoteFX cap driver, the integrated video adapter is disabled while the operating system is running.
For more information you can refer beneath article.
1. RemoteFX (with Hyper-V) is a serious business tool. For games.
2. Configure RemoteFX in Hyper-V running Windows Server 2012 with low end GPU
Hope it helps!
Thanks.
Dharmesh Solanki

0x80070035 Across WAN between Windows 2012/8 Computers

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for