1.3 is more slow then 1.2

Hi
I found the 1.3 more slow then the 1.2 , i mean the sliders are slow to move in the develop module using the zoom ratio Fit to screen
the 1.2 is blazing fast , the 1.3 is slow
I run it on xp , p4 3.6 ,4gb of ram , and 4 sata2 in raid
I did notice that the sliders are slow , sticky not smooth only in the fit to screen zoom ratio in the other ratios it's fast
I played in the catalog setting , with different setting and i tried to render 1:1
, update ati drivers ,i have a x800 pic express with 512 mb of ram
this version 1.3 has for me the same problem of the 1.0
my spec
Giovanni P4 3.6 ,4gb ram ,4 hds sata2 seagate 320gb, xp pro 2 , ati x800 pci-express 512mb , photoshop cs3 ,lightroom 1.2

I want to add my voice to the "1.3 is slower than 1.2 list"
We work with both PC's and Macs, and we are both sitting here shaking our heads as to the slowness... almost unusable when trying to sort photos.
The slowness is very dramatic AFTER you have applied a few edits to a photo. So if you have cropped, adjusted exposure, etc, to a bunch of photos, and then you want to go through all the adjusted photos to further narrow them down, the "rendering larger version" message goes on for a long time between each photo. While that happens, the photo is very blurry.
Lightroom seems to be an acceptable option only for people that are working with a few dozen photos at a time. In my case the collection that I have adjusted and am trying to narrow down is about 330 images.
Yes, I have rendered the photos both large and 1:1. From RAW files.
I am re-rendering now (over 1 hour so far and still waiting) the large versions after they have been adjusted.
If forcing a re-render fixes the problem, that means that Lightroom is not storing an adjusted preview whenever it leaves a photo, causing the preview to be recalculated every time it gets revisited from then after. It seems that crop and rotate can make things really bad.
(And before you bother Lee Jay... we know that Lightroom works perfectly peachy-keen for you all the time)

Similar Messages

Why surf internet a bit slow then before? more slow then IE? before this, Mozilla Firefox is the fastest...

(Speedtest)
Using Mozilla Firefox>> http://www.speedtest.net/result/1695716803.png
Using Google Chrome>> http://www.speedtest.net/result/1695720452.png
Using IE>> http://www.speedtest.net/result/1695723518.png

Hi,
This test is about the wire speed, not a browser test. Also, the servers chosen were three different ones, possibly could be anywhere, Europe or Americas, other than Malaysia.
Useful links:
[https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Options%20window All about Tools > Options]
[http://kb.mozillazine.org/About:config Going beyond Tools > Options - about:config]
[http://kb.mozillazine.org/About:config_entries about:config Entries]
[https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Page%20Info%20window Page Info] Tools (Alt + T) > Page Info, Right-click > View Page Info
[https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Keyboard%20shortcuts Keyboard Shortcuts]
[https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Viewing%20video%20in%20Firefox%20without%20a%20plugin Viewing Video without Plugins]
[http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox Firefox Profile Folder & Files]
[https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Command_Line_Options#Browser Firefox Commands]
[https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Basic%20Troubleshooting Basic Troubleshooting]
[https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/common-questions-after-upgrading-firefox-36 After Upgrading]
[https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Safe%20Mode Safe Mode]
[http://kb.mozillazine.org/Problematic_extensions Problematic Extensions]
[https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Troubleshooting%20extensions%20and%20themes Troubleshooting Extensions and Themes]
[https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Troubleshooting%20plugins Troubleshooting Plugins]
[http://kb.mozillazine.org/Testing_plugins Testing Plugins]

Cs6 13.0.1 32bit type more slow ? under windows 7

Hi
i updated cs6 to 13.0.1 , i run it under w7 32bit
i guess it's the last vesion
when i try to type there is a lag ...
for example i type "this photo is protected" , well i got a lag when i type "this...."
i did not notice under 13.0.0
and another question , is there a different between photoshop cs6 stand alone and the version included inside the collection like mastercollecion and so on
i have the stand alone normal not extended
but a friend of mine runs photoshop cs6 32bit , he got master collection , under w7 and he told me it's more slow then the stand alone version
thanks
cheers

my font list in windows folder
8514fix.fon
8514fixe.fon
8514fixg.fon
8514fixr.fon
8514fixt.fon
8514oem.fon
8514oeme.fon
8514oemg.fon
8514oemr.fon
8514oemt.fon
8514sys.fon
8514syse.fon
8514sysg.fon
8514sysr.fon
8514syst.fon
85775.fon
85855.fon
85f1255.fon
85f1256.fon
85f1257.fon
85f874.fon
85s1255.fon
85s1256.fon
85s1257.fon
85s874.fon
ACaslonPro-Bold.otf
ACaslonPro-BoldItalic.otf
ACaslonPro-Italic.otf
ACaslonPro-Regular.otf
ACaslonPro-Semibold.otf
ACaslonPro-SemiboldItalic.otf
AdobeArabic-Bold.otf
AdobeArabic-BoldItalic.otf
AdobeArabic-Italic.otf
AdobeArabic-Regular.otf
AdobeDevanagari-Bold.otf
AdobeDevanagari-BoldItalic.otf
AdobeDevanagari-Italic.otf
AdobeDevanagari-Regular.otf
AdobeFangsongStd-Regular.otf
AdobeFanHeitiStd-Bold.otf
AdobeGothicStd-Bold.otf
AdobeHebrew-Bold.otf
AdobeHebrew-BoldItalic.otf
AdobeHebrew-Italic.otf
AdobeHebrew-Regular.otf
AdobeHeitiStd-Regular.otf
AdobeKaitiStd-Regular.otf
AdobeMingStd-Light.otf
AdobeMyungjoStd-Medium.otf
AdobeNaskh-Medium.otf
AdobeSongStd-Light.otf
AGaramondPro-Bold.otf
AGaramondPro-BoldItalic.otf
AGaramondPro-Italic.otf
AGaramondPro-Regular.otf
ahronbd.ttf
andlso.ttf
angsa.ttf
angsab.ttf
angsai.ttf
angsau.ttf
angsaub.ttf
angsaui.ttf
angsauz.ttf
angsaz.ttf
aparaj.ttf
aparajb.ttf
aparajbi.ttf
aparaji.ttf
app775.fon
app850.fon
app852.fon
app855.fon
app857.fon
app866.fon
app932.fon
app936.fon
app949.fon
app950.fon
arabtype.ttf
arial.ttf
arialbd.ttf
arialbi.ttf
ariali.ttf
ariblk.ttf
batang.ttc
BellGothicStd-Black.otf
BellGothicStd-Bold.otf
BirchStd.otf
BlackoakStd.otf
browa.ttf
browab.ttf
browai.ttf
browau.ttf
browaub.ttf
browaui.ttf
browauz.ttf
browaz.ttf
BrushScriptStd.otf
c8514fix.fon
c8514oem.fon
c8514sys.fon
calibri.ttf
calibrib.ttf
calibrii.ttf
calibriz.ttf
cambria.ttc
cambriab.ttf
cambriai.ttf
cambriaz.ttf
Candara.ttf
Candarab.ttf
Candarai.ttf
Candaraz.ttf
cga40737.fon
cga40850.fon
cga40852.fon
cga40857.fon
cga40866.fon
cga40869.fon
cga40woa.fon
cga80737.fon
cga80850.fon
cga80852.fon
cga80857.fon
cga80866.fon
cga80869.fon
cga80woa.fon
ChaparralPro-Bold.otf
ChaparralPro-BoldIt.otf
ChaparralPro-Italic.otf
ChaparralPro-LightIt.otf
ChaparralPro-Regular.otf
CharlemagneStd-Bold.otf
comic.ttf
comicbd.ttf
consola.ttf
consolab.ttf
consolai.ttf
consolaz.ttf
constan.ttf
constanb.ttf
constani.ttf
constanz.ttf
CooperBlackStd.otf
CooperBlackStd-Italic.otf
corbel.ttf
corbelb.ttf
corbeli.ttf
corbelz.ttf
cordia.ttf
cordiab.ttf
cordiai.ttf
cordiau.ttf
cordiaub.ttf
cordiaui.ttf
cordiauz.ttf
cordiaz.ttf
coue1255.fon
coue1256.fon
coue1257.fon
couf1255.fon
couf1256.fon
couf1257.fon
cour.ttf
courbd.ttf
courbi.ttf
coure.fon
couree.fon
coureg.fon
courer.fon
couret.fon
courf.fon
courfe.fon
courfg.fon
courfr.fon
courft.fon
couri.ttf
cvgafix.fon
cvgasys.fon
daunpenh.ttf
david.ttf
davidbd.ttf
desktop.ini
dokchamp.ttf
dos737.fon
dos869.fon
dosapp.fon
ebrima.ttf
ebrimabd.ttf
EccentricStd.otf
ega40737.fon
ega40850.fon
ega40852.fon
ega40857.fon
ega40866.fon
ega40869.fon
ega40woa.fon
ega80737.fon
ega80850.fon
ega80852.fon
ega80857.fon
ega80866.fon
ega80869.fon
ega80woa.fon
estre.ttf
euphemia.ttf
fms_metadata.xml
framd.ttf
framdit.ttf
frank.ttf
Gabriola.ttf
gautami.ttf
gautamib.ttf
georgia.ttf
georgiab.ttf
georgiai.ttf
georgiaz.ttf
GiddyupStd.otf
gisha.ttf
gishabd.ttf
GlobalMonospace.CompositeFont
GlobalSansSerif.CompositeFont
GlobalSerif.CompositeFont
GlobalUserInterface.CompositeFont
gulim.ttc
h8514fix.fon
h8514oem.fon
h8514sys.fon
himalaya.ttf
HoboStd.otf
hvgafix.fon
hvgasys.fon
impact.ttf
iskpota.ttf
iskpotab.ttf
j8514fix.fon
j8514oem.fon
j8514sys.fon
jsmalle.fon
jsmallf.fon
jvgafix.fon
jvgasys.fon
kaiu.ttf
kalinga.ttf
kalingab.ttf
kartika.ttf
kartikab.ttf
KhmerUI.ttf
KhmerUIb.ttf
kokila.ttf
kokilab.ttf
kokilabi.ttf
kokilai.ttf
KozGoPr6N-Bold.otf
KozGoPr6N-ExtraLight.otf
KozGoPr6N-Heavy.otf
KozGoPr6N-Light.otf
KozGoPr6N-Medium.otf
KozGoPr6N-Regular.otf
KozGoPro-Bold.otf
KozGoPro-ExtraLight.otf
KozGoPro-Heavy.otf
KozGoPro-Light.otf
KozGoPro-Medium.otf
KozGoPro-Regular.otf
KozMinPr6N-Bold.otf
KozMinPr6N-ExtraLight.otf
KozMinPr6N-Heavy.otf
KozMinPr6N-Light.otf
KozMinPr6N-Medium.otf
KozMinPr6N-Regular.otf
KozMinPro-Bold.otf
KozMinPro-ExtraLight.otf
KozMinPro-Heavy.otf
KozMinPro-Light.otf
KozMinPro-Medium.otf
KozMinPro-Regular.otf
l_10646.ttf
LaoUI.ttf
LaoUIb.ttf
latha.ttf
lathab.ttf
leelawad.ttf
leelawdb.ttf
LetterGothicStd.otf
LetterGothicStd-Bold.otf
LetterGothicStd-BoldSlanted.otf
LetterGothicStd-Slanted.otf
LithosPro-Black.otf
LithosPro-Regular.otf
lucon.ttf
lvnm.ttf
lvnmbd.ttf
majalla.ttf
majallab.ttf
malgun.ttf
malgunbd.ttf
mangal.ttf
mangalb.ttf
marlett.ttf
meiryo.ttc
meiryob.ttc
MesquiteStd.otf
micross.ttf
mingliu.ttc
mingliub.ttc
MinionPro-Bold.otf
MinionPro-BoldCn.otf
MinionPro-BoldCnIt.otf
MinionPro-BoldIt.otf
MinionPro-It.otf
MinionPro-Medium.otf
MinionPro-MediumIt.otf
MinionPro-Regular.otf
MinionPro-Semibold.otf
MinionPro-SemiboldIt.otf
modern.fon
monbaiti.ttf
moolbor.ttf
mriam.ttf
mriamc.ttf
msgothic.ttc
msjh.ttf
msjhbd.ttf
msmincho.ttc
msuighur.ttf
msyh.ttf
msyhbd.ttf
msyi.ttf
mvboli.ttf
MyriadArabic-Bold.otf
MyriadArabic-BoldIt.otf
MyriadArabic-It.otf
MyriadArabic-Regular.otf
MyriadHebrew-Bold.otf
MyriadHebrew-BoldIt.otf
MyriadHebrew-It.otf
MyriadHebrew-Regular.otf
MyriadPro-Bold.otf
MyriadPro-BoldCond.otf
MyriadPro-BoldCondIt.otf
MyriadPro-BoldIt.otf
MyriadPro-Cond.otf
MyriadPro-CondIt.otf
MyriadPro-It.otf
MyriadPro-Regular.otf
MyriadPro-Semibold.otf
MyriadPro-SemiboldIt.otf
nrkis.ttf
ntailu.ttf
ntailub.ttf
NuevaStd-Bold.otf
NuevaStd-BoldCond.otf
NuevaStd-BoldCondItalic.otf
NuevaStd-Cond.otf
NuevaStd-CondItalic.otf
NuevaStd-Italic.otf
nyala.ttf
OCRAStd.otf
OratorStd.otf
OratorStd-Slanted.otf
pala.ttf
palab.ttf
palabi.ttf
palai.ttf
phagspa.ttf
phagspab.ttf
plantc.ttf
PoplarStd.otf
PrestigeEliteStd-Bd.otf
raavi.ttf
raavib.ttf
rod.ttf
roman.fon
RosewoodStd-Regular.otf
s8514fix.fon
s8514oem.fon
s8514sys.fon
script.fon
segoepr.ttf
segoeprb.ttf
segoesc.ttf
segoescb.ttf
segoeui.ttf
segoeuib.ttf
segoeuii.ttf
segoeuil.ttf
segoeuiz.ttf
seguisb.ttf
seguisym.ttf
sere1255.fon
sere1256.fon
sere1257.fon
serf1255.fon
serf1256.fon
serf1257.fon
serife.fon
serifee.fon
serifeg.fon
serifer.fon
serifet.fon
seriff.fon
seriffe.fon
seriffg.fon
seriffr.fon
serifft.fon
Shonar.ttf
Shonarb.ttf
shruti.ttf
shrutib.ttf
simfang.ttf
simhei.ttf
simkai.ttf
simpbdo.ttf
simpfxo.ttf
simpo.ttf
simsun.ttc
simsunb.ttf
smae1255.fon
smae1256.fon
smae1257.fon
smaf1255.fon
smaf1256.fon
smaf1257.fon
smalle.fon
smallee.fon
smalleg.fon
smaller.fon
smallet.fon
smallf.fon
smallfe.fon
smallfg.fon
smallfr.fon
smallft.fon
ssee1255.fon
ssee1256.fon
ssee1257.fon
ssee874.fon
ssef1255.fon
ssef1256.fon
ssef1257.fon
ssef874.fon
sserife.fon
sserifee.fon
sserifeg.fon
sserifer.fon
sserifet.fon
sseriff.fon
sseriffe.fon
sseriffg.fon
sseriffr.fon
sserifft.fon
StaticCache.dat
StencilStd.otf
svgafix.fon
svgasys.fon
sylfaen.ttf
symbol.ttf
tahoma.ttf
tahomabd.ttf
taile.ttf
taileb.ttf
TektonPro-Bold.otf
TektonPro-BoldCond.otf
TektonPro-BoldExt.otf
TektonPro-BoldObl.otf
times.ttf
timesbd.ttf
timesbi.ttf
timesi.ttf
tradbdo.ttf
trado.ttf
TrajanPro-Bold.otf
TrajanPro-Regular.otf
trebuc.ttf
trebucbd.ttf
trebucbi.ttf
trebucit.ttf
tunga.ttf
tungab.ttf
upcdb.ttf
upcdbi.ttf
upcdi.ttf
upcdl.ttf
upceb.ttf
upcebi.ttf
upcei.ttf
upcel.ttf
upcfb.ttf
upcfbi.ttf
upcfi.ttf
upcfl.ttf
upcib.ttf
upcibi.ttf
upcii.ttf
upcil.ttf
upcjb.ttf
upcjbi.ttf
upcji.ttf
upcjl.ttf
upckb.ttf
upckbi.ttf
upcki.ttf
upckl.ttf
upclb.ttf
upclbi.ttf
upcli.ttf
upcll.ttf
utsaah.ttf
utsaahb.ttf
utsaahbi.ttf
utsaahi.ttf
Vani.ttf
Vanib.ttf
verdana.ttf
verdanab.ttf
verdanai.ttf
verdanaz.ttf
vga737.fon
vga775.fon
vga850.fon
vga852.fon
vga855.fon
vga857.fon
vga860.fon
vga861.fon
vga863.fon
vga865.fon
vga866.fon
vga869.fon
vga932.fon
vga936.fon
vga949.fon
vga950.fon
vgaf1255.fon
vgaf1256.fon
vgaf1257.fon
vgaf874.fon
vgafix.fon
vgafixe.fon
vgafixg.fon
vgafixr.fon
vgafixt.fon
vgaoem.fon
vgas1255.fon
vgas1256.fon
vgas1257.fon
vgas874.fon
vgasys.fon
vgasyse.fon
vgasysg.fon
vgasysr.fon
vgasyst.fon
vijaya.ttf
vijayab.ttf
vrinda.ttf
vrindab.ttf
webdings.ttf
wingding.ttf

Mac mini Core Solo is a great deal slower then 1.5ghz mac mini G4??

I have two mac minis, one has a 1.5 Ghz G4 and the other has a 1.5 Ghz Core Solo. Both have 512mb of RAM and OS X 10.4.7. I have the same software installed between them. They both have the latest updates for Office 2004 installed, both have the latest system updates, latest Firefox updates, both have latest Adobe Reader updates, and both have Quark 6.5 installed.
The Core Solo mac mini is WAY slower then the G4, Entourage in particular is almost slow to the point it is unworkable. Is this due to the Rosetta emulation? What can I do to improve this, will increasing the ram to 1 GB clear these speed issues or am I going to have to return this mini and get one with a Core Duo?
The current sluggishness on the Core Solo mini is unbearable, literally my Powerbook G4 667mhz with 768mb of ram is loads faster then this mini is. I'm thinking more RAM will do the trick, but wanted to bounce this off of some other experts here first. Thanks.

Entourage in particular is almost slow to the point it is unworkable. Is this due to the Rosetta emulation?
Yes, almost certainly. Microsoft Office is not yet Intel-native, so it's gonig to run more slowly than a native edition would. The same will apply to any PowerPC-only software.
What can I do to improve this, will increasing the ram to 1 GB clear these speed issues
I can't say for certain, but other users have reported that increasing the RAM to 1GB (or beyond) has made significant improvements in performance.

Why is the SSD on 2011 Macbook Air much slower then 2010 Macbook Pro with Samsung 830 SSD (less then half the speed) ?

Why is a laptop designed from ground up to use flash slower then a older laptop with a upgraded SSD from a 3rd party?
My old MBP is more then 2x the speed (read/write) with a SSD upgrade (Samsung 830) then my Air.
Any fixes or mods to boost the flash speed of the Air?

We would like you to show us how to do that.......Especially when the Samsung 830 will not fit the Air.....Please don't say duct tape....
Ok, scratch that idea. Let me think for a moment,,,em,,,em. OK I got it. Sell both units and buy a mid Macbook Air 2012 version.
(d-mn I'm good)
__________ All Hail The King _________

Results are in: Leopard slower then Tiger on PowerPC

Xbenched this yesterday. Dual booting on a 12" PowerBook...both Leopard and Tiger boot have Dashboard disabled and are running iStat Menu. Though the back end is slight faster, check out the User Interface and Graphic entries...finally explains why I "felt" that Leopard is slower then Tiger on this machine..it is!
Tiger first:
Results 43.43
System Info
Xbench Version 1.3
System Version 10.4.11 (8S165)
Physical RAM 1280 MB
Model PowerBook6,4
Processor PowerPC G4 @ 1.33 GHz
L1 Cache 32K (instruction), 32K (data)
L2 Cache 512K @ 1.33 GHz
Bus Frequency 167 MHz
Video Card GeForce FX Go5200
Drive Type TOSHIBA MK6025GAS
CPU Test 66.60
GCD Loop 102.38 5.40 Mops/sec
Floating Point Basic 43.53 1.03 Gflop/sec
AltiVec Basic 262.70 10.47 Gflop/sec
vecLib FFT 76.86 2.54 Gflop/sec
Floating Point Library 39.20 6.83 Mops/sec
Thread Test 54.31
Computation 53.32 1.08 Mops/sec, 4 threads
Lock Contention 55.33 2.38 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads
Memory Test 32.79
System 28.50
Allocate 110.05 404.13 Kalloc/sec
Fill 27.15 1320.16 MB/sec
Copy 16.85 347.95 MB/sec
Stream 38.61
Copy 42.49 877.53 MB/sec [altivec]
Scale 44.19 912.98 MB/sec [altivec]
Add 36.82 784.25 MB/sec [altivec]
Triad 33.04 706.91 MB/sec [altivec]
Quartz Graphics Test 58.78
Line 51.99 3.46 Klines/sec [50% alpha]
Rectangle 59.49 17.76 Krects/sec [50% alpha]
Circle 60.43 4.93 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha]
Bezier 66.27 1.67 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha]
Text 57.54 3.60 Kchars/sec
OpenGL Graphics Test 64.96
Spinning Squares 64.96 82.41 frames/sec
User Interface Test 35.36
Elements 35.36 162.31 refresh/sec
Disk Test 27.34
Sequential 51.31
Uncached Write 46.48 28.54 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Write 42.94 24.30 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Uncached Read 81.00 23.70 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Read 48.05 24.15 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Random 18.64
Uncached Write 6.51 0.69 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Write 37.23 11.92 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Uncached Read 52.46 0.37 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Read 66.12 12.27 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Leopard is here:
Results 38.30
System Info
Xbench Version 1.3
System Version 10.5.1 (9B18)
Physical RAM 1280 MB
Model PowerBook6,4
Processor PowerPC G4 @ 1.33 GHz
L1 Cache 32K (instruction), 32K (data)
L2 Cache 512K @ 1.33 GHz
Bus Frequency 167 MHz
Video Card GeForce FX Go5200
Drive Type TOSHIBA MK6025GAS TOSHIBA MK6025GAS
CPU Test 68.24
GCD Loop 108.63 5.73 Mops/sec
Floating Point Basic 43.91 1.04 Gflop/sec
AltiVec Basic 265.00 10.56 Gflop/sec
vecLib FFT 77.25 2.55 Gflop/sec
Floating Point Library 40.70 7.09 Mops/sec
Thread Test 47.78
Computation 55.94 1.13 Mops/sec, 4 threads
Lock Contention 41.69 1.79 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads
Memory Test 35.50
System 32.91
Allocate 217.07 797.16 Kalloc/sec
Fill 29.10 1415.13 MB/sec
Copy 19.16 395.66 MB/sec
Stream 38.54
Copy 42.76 883.27 MB/sec [altivec]
Scale 43.93 907.62 MB/sec [altivec]
Add 36.47 776.79 MB/sec [altivec]
Triad 33.10 708.10 MB/sec [altivec]
Quartz Graphics Test 69.27
Line 57.49 3.83 Klines/sec [50% alpha]
Rectangle 71.05 21.21 Krects/sec [50% alpha]
Circle 63.90 5.21 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha]
Bezier 72.39 1.83 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha]
Text 88.92 5.56 Kchars/sec
OpenGL Graphics Test 62.08
Spinning Squares 62.08 78.76 frames/sec
User Interface Test 20.86
Elements 20.86 95.72 refresh/sec
Disk Test 24.68
Sequential 40.70
Uncached Write 35.34 21.70 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Write 32.79 18.55 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Uncached Read 69.06 20.21 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Read 40.00 20.10 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Random 17.71
Uncached Write 6.30 0.67 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Write 33.58 10.75 MB/sec [256K blocks]
Uncached Read 48.26 0.34 MB/sec [4K blocks]
Uncached Read 60.08 11.15 MB/sec [256K blocks]

The Leopard interface is definitely more graphics intensive (and I have heard suggestions that Leopard transfers more work to the graphics card than earlier versions of OSX). I guess at some level of hardware any processing efficiencies will be outweighed by the load on the graphics card. In other words, can you be sure that your results would replicate on a PPC machine with a more powerful graphics card and more VRAM?

AEBSn 5.0 slower then AEXPress G

Past requests for help in Discussions have been great BUT it seems that every so often performance via AEBSn goes south.
1. AEBSn using 5.0 for my MacBook Pro. My wife's Powerbook is using Airport Express that is hardwired in to AEBSn and set up as BRIDGE (per Express recommendation.
2. Our IP is feeding house at 5614 kbps download and 953 upload. My wireless feed from AEBSn is 1454/616 which is SLOWER then when I access via Airport Express (1578/634)
3. Both units are set to determine CHANNEL automatically. In the past I have manually checked all the channels for performance on the Express (time consuming)but the AEBSn using 5.0 will only allow Automatic
4. Both AEBSn and Express use WEP Personal.
5. In the past I have been able to get very good speeds off both AEBSn and Express, in fact almost as good as hard wired. For the last couple of days it is very slow and erratic.
6. I have iStumbler but am not sure how to use it other then checking channels.
Question: Could I have AEBSn and Express incorrectly setup? Any suggestions?
Always appreciate input.
David

Hi Tingi... interesting however,
*your point 2.*: You _won't be able to change the frequency/channel (it is 36 I believe)_ for 802.11n@5Ghz. t seems set that way.
Just as a suggestion, AS A TRYOUT, why not BACK the base stations to 802.11N @ 2.4Ghz and give tha a try.
I have experienced the situation you have ages ago and it was related to signal peneration between base statsion.. for me at least.
I isolated it and ended up buying another APX 11.n .. *how I get 270-300Mbs on a 802.11N @ 5Ghz*.
Anyway just try the 802.11n@ 2.4Ghz.. you sould get 130Mbs (thats 130Mbs) .. certainly a load more than 6Mbs.!!
However you wifes PB G4 may is certainly 802..1G or earlier. My wife has an 12inches (300mm) PB 887Mhz and it connects at 802.11g at 36Mbs MAX.. so ok for small timemachine updates &adn net surfing and emails.
Post your reults.
w

11.9 very slow then 11.7

Flash player 11.9 (last version) too, too, TOO SLOW then 11.7 (or earlier 11.9). Shaders works very slow in windows player's plug-in Why? What's happen? I'm the developer and this is very important for me! Is it bug or ...?

Emerging security research related to Virtual Machines and Just-In-Time compilers compelled us to disable the JIT compilation for old-school Pixel Bender shaders. We did not take this decision lightly as we try to never break backwards compatibility; however, we feel that in this instance, it was the right move in terms of protecting customers and end-users.
We recommend that you migrate your shaders to Stage3D and AGAL (aka Pixel-Bender 3D).
You can find more information about Stage3D and AGAL here: http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flashplayer/articles/what-is-agal.html
Again, sorry for the inconvenience.

Is lightroom 3 really more fast then 2.5

Hi
i have a question
i bought lightroom 1.4.1
i tried lightroom 2.x and the beta version 3
but i did not find more fast then the 2.x version
do you find the beta3 more fast then 2.x?
i'm under xp and vista
thanks

Interactive performance is improved (e,g. scrolling thumbnails in Grid view and switching from module to module). However, preview rendering and export are slower.

My mac become more slower after update to Mountainlion

My mac become more slower after update to Mountainlion
What shoudl I do? can you guys help me? BTW I have update my RAM to 8G
Thank you

What is your Mac?
What did you update from? 10.6 or 10.7?
If from 10.6 or your machine was at 10.5 at one time, it might be too old/slow for 10.8, you might want to revert to 10.6 again.
How to revert your Mac to Snow Leopard
What do you notice is slower than before? Like Internet or booting or loading programs or UI feel or what exactly?
If it's the Internet, then check this out
WiFi, Internet problems, possible solutions
WiFi security issues, at home and WiFi hotspots
Now a fresh install of OS X usually does wonders, this would mean you will need to take acurate account of your installed programs, passwords, export bookmarks and backup all your data to a external storage drive. Keep the boot drive data below 50% filled ideally, (not much for you apprantly, just reduce 50GB of data)
Most commonly used backup methods
Write down your AppleID and password to reinstall 10.8
When your sure, then hold command r boot into Recovery, use Disk Utility to Erase (middle selection) the Macintosh HD partition and wait, it's going to map off fialing sectors. When done quit and reinstall 10.8 fresh and install programs and files from backup into the same named accounts.
https://support.apple.com/kb/HT4718
That should make things zippy again. Also a #12 OnyX cache cleaning routine
Step by Step to fix your Mac
Another method is this, it's a defragging/performance speed up step, you won't have to reset everything up again from scracth like a fresh install method does. But it requires paid software and a external drive, but makes a excellent bootable backup in the process that can save your behind one day.
How to properly defrag a Mac's hard drive

Our Imac becomes more and more slow

Our Imac becomes more and more slow ("rainbow wheel" appearing most of the time. We suspect some kind of internet pollution. Dors anybody know where hidden big files could have been stored and should be deleted?
Thanks

DamienGD wrote:
Our Imac becomes more and more slow ("rainbow wheel" appearing most of the time. We suspect some kind of internet pollution. Dors anybody know where hidden big files could have been stored and should be deleted?
Thanks
There are lots of reasons why a computer might slow down but the most common are 1) too little RAM, 2) the hard drive is too full, and 3) a 'rogue' program is using lots of CPU cycles. The first step to dealing with this problem is not to try 'cleaning' the computer.
How much hard drive space is free on your computer? Programs need to create temporary files so the computer should have some empty space for them. You should keep something like 10%-15% free. There's a tool in the Utilities folder of your Applications folder called Activity Monitor. Drag it to your Dock so it hand, then reboot your computer and start Activity Monitor.
The activity Monitor will let you look at what your computer is doing and you'll want to keep your eye on two things: Click on the CPU tab and you can see all the programs your computer is running. In the list you can click on the CPU column to get the list sorted by CPU usage. This is useful because it lets you see if a program is using lots of CPU cycles. If you have an application that is consistently running at 50% or higher, that is probably not good. The second thing you want to watch is RAM. Click on the System Memory tab and you can see all the programs and how much RAM each one is using. But the really important information is next to the pie chart. You'll see VM, Page ins, Page outs, etc. The Page ins number is important - a high number is not good.
I suggested that you reboot your computer before you started the Activity Monitor. This will have reset Page Ins to 0. Now over the course of an hour, keep referring to the Page ins. If that number remains 0, you have plenty of RAM. The higher it gets, the more you need a Memory upgrade. When you restarted the computer also deleted all the temporary files, so take a look at the free space too. At this point you should see at least 10% free. If not, your drive might be too full.

Safari and firefox stop working after a few minutes of browsing, regardless of what site I'm on. I have to restart my computer to get internet access again but it only works for a few more minutes, then I have to restart again. Please help!

Safari and firefox stop working after a few minutes of browsing, regardless of what site I'm on. I have to restart my computer to get internet access again but it only works for a few more minutes, then I have to restart again. I don't get a spinning ball, it just stops working at whatever page it's on. I can close the program just fine but when I re-open it, either safari or firefox, it freezes trying to load the hompage. This started a few days ago after trying to stream a movie on my computer. I'm on a Mac Air OS X Version 10.6.8 and have downloaded all updates. When I go into finder, it says I have over 80 gigs available. Is there some other memory cache that I need to check? Thanks so much for your help.

ejwoodall wrote:
It's not a router problem as I explained in my post. If it was a router problem then I wouldn't have the problem everywhere I go. It is an issue with the software.
Then I guess the millions of people running 10.5.7 with no issues are just hallucinating that their machines are working fine?
I'm not trying to belittle your issues; you're certainly having them and I know first hand how annoying an intermittent AirPort issue can be. (In fact, mine was due to an AirPort driver bug that no one else seemed to suffer from.)
The single best diagnostic you could do is take your system running 10.5.7 to an Apple Store, and try using their in-store network.
If your machine performs flawlessly, it may be a router issue.
If your machine has connectivity issues there, it may be a hardware problem with your machine.
There have been numerous people in multiple threads over the years who swore that an update was buggy because things used to work, but returned later to sheepishly admit that they took their machine in, a problem was found and fixed, and now their Mac works flawlessly with the newer software.
But simply reinstalling 10.5.5 in no way means the explanation of how firmware bugs may be at play here is incorrect.
In the context of that explanation, all you've done is possibly reinstall software that asks to add "2 + 3."

Why is the australian MacBook pro with retina display far more expensive then the American one when the Australian dollar is much stronger

Why is the australian MacBook pro with retina display far more expensive then the American one when the Australian dollar is much stronger

this is a user response forum, i'm not sure what you think we will know. Apple doesn't reply here. you would probably have to contact the main Apple HQ in Australia to have a chance to get any kind of answer.
previous thread on this: https://discussions.apple.com/message/15987962#15987962

ActionScript 3.0 is 5~7 times slower then ActionScript 2.0

I have a code that will translate this XML
quote:
<?xml version='1.0'?>
<Member>
<M>
<Username>Test 1</Username>
<Password>Test 1 Password</Password>
</M>
<M>
<Username>Test 2</Username>
<Password>Test 2 Password</Password>
</M>
<M>
<Username>Test 3</Username>
<Password>Test 3 Password</Password>
</M>
</Member>
Into this array
quote:
Array[0].Username = "Test 1"
Array[0].Password = "Test 1 Password"
Array[1].Username = "Test 2"
Array[1].Password = "Test 2 Password"
Array[2].Username = "Test 3"
Array[2].Password = "Test 3 Password"
Here is my variable declaration
quote:
var StartTime:Number = getTimer();
var EndTime:Number = getTimer();
var j:Number = 0;//This Variables used for ActionScript 3.0
Loop
var k:Number = 0;//This Variables used for ActionScript 3.0
Loop
Here is the XML String
quote:
var MyXMLString:String = "<?xml
version='1.0'?><member><O><member_id>1</member_id><currency_id>0</currency_id><name>Admin istrator</name><description>Account
Administrator</description><contact>-</contact><billing_info>-</billing_info><opening_pay able>0.0000000000</opening_payable><opening_receivable>0.0000000000</opening_receivable><t ype>STAFF</type><asset_chart_of_account_id>0</asset_chart_of_account_id><liability_chart_o f_account_id>0</liability_chart_of_account_id><staff_username>administrator</staff_usernam e><staff_password>21232f297a57a5a743894a0e4a801fc3</staff_password><staff_privileges>ADMIN </staff_privileges></O><O><member_id>1</member_id><currency_id>0</currency_id><name>Admini strator</name><description>Account
Administrator</description><contact>-</contact><billing_info>-</billing_info><opening_pay able>0.0000000000</opening_payable><opening_receivable>0.0000000000</opening_receivable><t ype>STAFF</type><asset_chart_of_account_id>0</asset_chart_of_account_id><liability_chart_o f_account_id>0</liability_chart_of_account_id><staff_username>administrator</staff_usernam e><staff_password>21232f297a57a5a743894a0e4a801fc3</staff_password><staff_privileges>ADMIN </staff_privileges></O><O><member_id>1</member_id><currency_id>0</currency_id><name>Admini strator</name><description>Account
Administrator</description><contact>-</contact><billing_info>-</billing_info><opening_pay able>0.0000000000</opening_payable><opening_receivable>0.0000000000</opening_receivable><t ype>STAFF</type><asset_chart_of_account_id>0</asset_chart_of_account_id><liability_chart_o f_account_id>0</liability_chart_of_account_id><staff_username>administrator</staff_usernam e><staff_password>21232f297a57a5a743894a0e4a801fc3</staff_password><staff_privileges>ADMIN </staff_privileges></O></member>";
var MyXML:XML = new XML(MyXMLString);//Parse the XML ONCE
I have a function called ConvertXML , and to check the
performance i made it loop every frame by calling the following
RunXML function
quote:
function RunXML(Events:Event){
StartTime = getTimer();
for(var i:Number=0;i<100;i++){
var MyXMLArr:Array = ConvertXML(MyXML, false, false);
EndTime = getTimer();
trace(EndTime - StartTime + " ms");
and here is my code for parsing the variable MyXML in
ActionScript 3.0 (ConvertXML function)
quote:
//Action Script 3.0 ConvertXML
import flash.xml.*;
function ConvertXML(RecvXML:XML, ChildBranch:Boolean,
IsTable:Boolean):Array {
var RowArr:Array = new Array();
for (j=0; j<RecvXML.child("*").length(); j++) {
var TempObject = new Object();
for (k=0; k<RecvXML.child("*")[j].elements("*").length();
k++) {
TempObject[RecvXML.child("*")[j].elements("*")[k].name()] =
RecvXML.child("*")[j].elements("*")[k];
RowArr.push(TempObject);
return RowArr;
addEventListener(Event.ENTER_FRAME, RunXML);
The code above run 5~7 times slower then the following
actionscript 2.0 code
quote:
//Action Script 2.0 ConvertXML
function ConvertXML(RecvXML:XML, ChildBranch:Boolean,
IsTable:Boolean):Array {
var RowArr:Array = new Array();
for (var aNode:XMLNode = RecvXML.firstChild.firstChild;
aNode != null; aNode=aNode.nextSibling) {
var TempRecord:Object = new Object();
for (var bNode:XMLNode = aNode.firstChild; bNode != null;
bNode=bNode.nextSibling) {
TempRecord[bNode.nodeName] = bNode.firstChild.toString();
RowArr.push(TempRecord);
return RowArr;
this.onEnterFrame = RunXML;
they both does exactly the same thing.. and yet the
actionscript 3.0 code run 5~7 TIMES SLOWER . why?
i have tried other benchmark, and it seems that actionscript
3.0 perform 10 to 100 TIMES FASTER then actionscript 2.0 , only for
this one it run slower... why?
I also attach all the code for actionscript 3.0
should you want to try the actionscript 2.0 , just uncomment
the ConvertXML and this.onEnterFrame for actionscript 2.0 and
comment the one for actionscript 3.0
Why? have i done something wrong?
Cheers and God Bless,
Chowi

Although this doesn't answer your specific question exactly,
it's worth noting that most of the time you do not need to convert
XML into an array or objects like it was helpful to do in AS2, as
XML is a native Object in AS3.
For instance, xml.M would give you an XMLList of logins that
would be treated the same was as your desired Array:
var logins:XMLList = xml.M;
trace(logins[0].Username) // "Test 1"
And that takes 0 milliseconds. ;) You can also declare you
XML directly in AS3, you do not need to declare it as a String and
parse it (see attached.)
Don't know what your trying to accomplish so that might not
help you, but I thought it was worth mentioning. I've been using
E4X extensively for the first time in a project and I have to say
that overall it's made life much easier for me.

FAST REFRESH OF MV IS TAKING MORE TIME THEN COMPLETE REFRESH IN PRODUCTION

Hi
We have production enviroment in which FAST REFRESH OF MV IS TAKING MORE TIME THEN COMPLETE REFRESH. Can you tell me what are the differences between this refreshes?
Regards,
RJ.

Sure:
create table emp (id number(9));
Table created.
SQL> alter table emp add primary key (id);
Table altered.
create materialized view log on emp;
Materialized view log created.
create materialized view emp_mv as select * from emp;
Materialized view created.
Complete refresh:
SQL> exec dbms_snapshot.refresh('EMP_MV','C');
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Fast Refresh:
SQL> exec dbms_snapshot.refresh('EMP_MV','F');
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
This is the basic setup. There are many more options to the create materialized view statement, just FYI.
Idan.

1.3 is more slow then 1.2

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for