1 big house - 1 IP address - more than 5 clients?

Hi there.
I’d like to ask this fantastic discussion group for advice on the following:
I (more or less) voluntarily accepted the task to wirelessly connect our house to the internet using cable internet service. This is the situation:
Our 2.5 floor (sizable) house accomodates 10 rooms translating into up to 10 individual people/computers which want to connect to the internet wirelessly at the same time.
A Netgear wireless gateway (came with the cable contract) has been extended via ethernet using an Airport Extreme base station. As an additional extension, an Airport Express station was configured to connect wirelessly to the Airport Extreme as a remote base. The Airport Extreme base was set to share the single IP address that was given to us by our ISP using the 10.xyz... numbering system (which is different than what our ISP uses). The Netgear uses channel 1, the two Apple stations channel 11 and all devices were distributed in several rooms of the basement.
My questions would be:
1. Since the Airport Extreme base distributes addresses using DHCP and NAT, is there an upper limit on the number of computers that can have internet access at the same time (our ISP says that only up to 5 computers can be hooked up at the same time using the Netgear device)?
2. If it’s possible to have up to 10 computers connected this way, would the only thing restricting the perfomance for us all be the connection speed (in addition to the reception, of course), i.e. could we get away by increasing the connection speed to make things smoother (by upgrading our contract with the ISP; we're on 6 Megs right now)?
3. Is this a reasonable way to set things up or are there smarter alternatives?
I am aware of the fact that i could try out a lot more on my own than i already did, it’s just that the other people are not totally crazy about this kind of experimentation (we still have to work on some reception issues in addition) so, i am asking to avoid a revolt
Thanks bunches.
PB G4   Mac OS X (10.4.3)  
PB G4   Mac OS X (10.4.3)  
PB G4   Mac OS X (10.4.3)  
PB G4   Mac OS X (10.4.3)  

Your method is reasonable, though not optimum. However it may be the best for you needs, since you ended up not having to run any Ethernet cabling.
In my own home, we have both wired and wireless connections. I use multiple Access Points, connected back to the router to distribute the wireless signal though out the house, and to an out-building about 250 feet away. Each AP has the same SSID and security settings, but they are configured to use different channels, in our case 1, 6, and 11. Two of the Access points use omni antennas to distribute the signal within the house, and the third uses a directional semi parabolic reflector antenna to send the signal to the out building.
The advantage of using multiple Access Points via wired Ethernet is that you don't downgrade the wireless performance by having to repeat the signal using a wireless repeater.
As far as the Netgear cable modem. I would guess that your cable company has it configured to only have a limited number of DHCP assigned IP's available. Since you have the Cable Modem connected to the Airport Express, and the Airport Express is handling your DHCP IP assignment, you should not have an issue with the "5" user limit.
As far as upgrading your cable connection, only you can decide if a 6 MB connection is enough (I would think so). However, I would be more concerned about the upload speed then the download.
Tom N.

Similar Messages

  • Will Snow Leopard (x64) allow my iMac to address more than 4 GB of RAM?

    I just finished reading the specs on Snow Leopard and it's early release this Friday. Will the ability to address more than 4 GB of physical RAM work on all supported platforms, or just new systems? I'm maxed with 4 GB now, but would love to turn up the power!

    Since your question is about a MacBook Pro, and this topic is in the Intel iMac category, you should go to the relevant forum, in this case probably this one
    http://discussions.apple.com/forum.jspa?forumID=1293
    and click the +Post New Topic+ link to create your own topic where other MacBook Pro users are likely to see it.
    My guess would be that it makes no difference, because these overall RAM limits are based on hardware limitations, not OS limitations. A Mac Pro was able to access 32GB of RAM back when Mac OS X was Tiger (two revisions ago), because its more advanced CPU and hardware architecture made it possible (not the OS).

  • How do I add more than 5 phone numbers and two emails to a contact in Thunderbird address book?

    I have just started using TB 31.4 and am planning to move contacts (about 1400 from Outlook) into the TB Address Book. Many of my contacts have multiple email addresses, more than five telephone numbers, and more than two street addresses.
    In doing a small import test I noticed that TB only has space for five telephone numbers and two email addresses, two street addresses. Is there a way to add more so that I do not lose this data on the import?
    Is there a way to rename telephone number fields (as almost no one has a pager anymore)?
    Can you create a third street address location?
    I understand the use of custom fields but that seems less than satisfactory method.

    There is an addon called 'MorefunctionsForAddressBook'. See link below.
    * https://freeshell.de/~kaosmos/morecols-en.html
    scroll down to the bottom to see the download link, which looks like this;
    '''Download MoreFunctionsForAddressBook - 0.7.1 version (TB 3.0 or higher)'''
    Download .xpi file to desktop or downloads file.
    '''How to install addon:'''
    In Thunderbird
    * 'Tools' > 'Add-ons' OR 'Menu Icon' > 'Add-ons'
    * Click on the gear wheel icon and select 'Install addon from file'
    * locate the addon .xpi file you downloaded and click on 'Open'.
    * Once installed it will appear in the list of Addon Extensions.
    * You will need to restart Thunderbird.
    This addon offers more fields etc and much more eg; importing etc.

  • Trying to get 32-bit Vista to see more than 2.5 gb of my 4gb ram - T500

    Hello all,
    I've been reading what I'm able to find on the subject, and have tried the following suggestions from (http://www.ocmodshop.com/ocmodshop.aspx?a=989) to bump up the amount of physical ram that Vista sees. I've tried to forceenable pae, and then :
    Type BCDedit /set nx AlwaysOff
    Type BCDedit /set pae ForceEnable
     Setting DEP off, and neither had any effect on the physical RAM available. I read a few posts hinting that these options may be unecessary in SP1 of vista as well. So, here are my questions :
    1. Is it possible for the T500 with 32-bit Vista to address more than 2.5gb of  physical ram?
    2. If so, how can I do it?
    3. Am I eligible for a 64-bit version of Vista with the recent purchase of my T500 and Vista Business?
    Any information is greatly appreciated. Thanks much all....
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    zoopside wrote:
    I changed to DISCRETE GRAPHICS, rebooted : still @ 2.5, then DISABLE SWITCHABLE, rebooted : still @ 2.5. My ATI driver was "found" again, rebooted, and now I'm still @ 2.5.
    I'll try a few more permutations of the options available, but did you do anything else?
    Keep rebooting.  At some point your system will recognize the additional ram.
    My system did the same thing as yours.  At first it showed an additional 54mb or so.
    Then all of sudden it was up to 3,065mb.  I can't remember how many reboots before
    the big jump occurred.  I am guessing 3 to 4 more reboots over a day or two.
    I don't know why it takes several reboots before the system will recognized the additional ram.
    T500 ~ T9400 2.53GHz 1066MHz 6MBL2 ~ Vista 32bit Home ~ WXGA 15.4 LED ~ ATI Mobility Radeon 3650 ~ 4GB ram ~ Camera ~ 160GB 7200rpm HD ~ Intel Turbo Memory 2GB ~ CD-RW/DVD ~ Intel WiFi 5300

  • How do I distribute apps to clients in house (more than a hundred)

    I'm currently wanting to distribute apps that plugin to software we have developed for our clients (more than a hundred).
    These apps are not for public and don't want them to be.
    1. How can I distribute them?
    2. Do I have to enroll in iOS Developer Program or iOS Developer Enterprise Program?
    3. Do my clients need to enroll in the iOS Developer Enterprise Program?
    Can somebody please help with this, it has been differcult to find infomation on this.
    Thanks Peter

    1.) The 100 device limit is for testing, not end-user/client distribution. As noted/linked, Apple's B2B/VPP will do what you want, but only if you and your clients are in supported countries.
    2.) Yes - see #1
    3.) No - see #1

  • How to prevent executing more than one client from a machine?

    Hi all,
    Currently I am doing a client server project in java. The client is java swing. There is a requirement to prevent executing more than one client from a machine.
    Now I am relying on socket for this. I listen to a port, say 15000 and when the second session is started it would give an exception at the socket. I know that this a trivial method. Can anybody please suggest a better method. Also is it possible to bring focus to already executing client, if the user tries to execute the client program again in the same machine?
    An early answer to this question is highly appreaciated.
    Thanks in advance
    SSM

    Thanks for the suggestion, but I dont think we can use socket for this. And again if we use file for the same as you described, I think it would sometime create a some serious side effects. Suppose after one client session is invoked, the power goes off. In this case the client shut down is not in the normal sequence and hence we cannot remove the file programaticaly. This creates big problem when the user tries to run client again.
    I am really interested to know, is there any standard way in java which can be used to achieve this. Also is it possible to give focus to already executing client program if the user tries to invoke the client again.
    Thanks
    SSM

  • BB stripping recipient name/address when they are more than one in TO or CC

    Have a very perplexing problem. My client cannot see more than one
    recipient name and/or address at the TO and CC lines on his
    blackberry, but he sees them ALL in Outlook.
    I can send to his [email protected]
    account, and he
    sees them in Outlook AND on his Blackberry.
    When I send to him on his [email protected] , he only sees 1
    name and/or address at the TO and CC line on his blackberry, but sees
    ALL recipients names and/or address in Outlook?
    I have looked at the messages in Exchange Message Tracking and I can
    see them hitting the server with the additional recipients (after the
    first name) removed when the SEND TO address is
    [email protected] .
    On some emails, he may have been the third name in the SEND TO list,
    and when he sees them on his Blackberry, it only shows the first
    persons name so if it wasn't him, he doesn't even see his name listed?
    There is not filter on his account and he is the only one with this
    problem. He has a Blackberry Curve.
    Rogers is no help....they just keep saying it's Exchange.
    Any ideas?

    what happens when that person does a "reply to all" from his/her blackberry device ? who are the different recipients ?
    can that person send a message to several To: from his/her device ?
    did you do the soft reboot or the hard reboot ?
    The search box on top-right of this page is your true friend, and the public Knowledge Base too:

  • How can i get apple tv2 to recognize more than one computer in my house

    how can i get apple tv2 to recognize more than one computer in my house, I just got it and can only find one of two computers in my home

    Same here. I have 1 ATV2 and 2 computers and each has separate iTunes accounts (mine and my wife's). The ATV menu says "computers" so I presume you can have more than 1 computer on 1 ATV. The big question is how do you set it up?

  • Binding more than one IP address to a server instance

    I know that it is possible to bind multiple IP addresses to multiple server
              instances. But is it possible to bind more than one IP address to just one
              server instance? If so, how can it be done?
              Thanks in advance,
              David Chen
              

    No...it won't work, I misunderstood your post. There is no way you can tell
              a WL instance to bind to multiple IPs...Sorry about that.
              .raja
              "Mike Reiche" <[email protected]> wrote in message
              news:[email protected]...
              >
              > no... I don't think it (not specifying a bindAddr to have WL bind on all
              NICs)
              > will work. You will have two WL instances trying to bind to the same
              IP/Port -
              > which is not allowed.
              >
              > Or did you mean something else.
              >
              > There is no way/syntax to ask WL to bind to two specific IP addresses.
              >
              > Mike
              >
              > "Raja Mukherjee" <[email protected]> wrote:
              > >Mike,
              > >
              > >It will work if both NIC1 and NIC2 are on the same nework. In David's
              > >case,
              > >the NICs are part of different subnet. WLS cluster is only supported
              > >on the
              > >same network.
              > >
              > >..raja
              > >
              > >"Mike Reiche" <[email protected]> wrote in message
              > >news:[email protected]...
              > >>
              > >> Are you running two instances on the same machine in the same cluster
              > >and
              > >you want
              > >> them all to listen on both NICs? That is the only thing I don't know
              > >how
              > >to do.
              > >>
              > >> You would need to four IP addresses -
              > >>
              > >> nic1 / instance1 - 208.8.7.1
              > >> nic2 / instance1 - 208.8.7.2
              > >>
              > >> nic1 / instance2 - 208.8.7.3
              > >> nic2 / instance2 - 208.8.7.4
              > >>
              > >> then somehow you would need to specify the following - HOWEVER, THERE
              > >IS
              > >NO DOCUMENTED
              > >> WAY TO DO THIS. Open a case with BEA support.
              > >>
              > >> on instance 1
              > >>
              > >> bindAddr=208.8.7.1,208.8.7.2 # don't know what the syntax is
              > >>
              > >> and on instance 2
              > >>
              > >> bindAddr=208.8.7.3,208.8.7.4 # don't know what the syntax is
              > >>
              > >> MIke
              > >>
              > >> "Raja Mukherjee" <[email protected]> wrote:
              > >> >David,
              > >> >
              > >> >From what I understood from your email, if you want to add additional
              > >> >instance for "internal" network and that solves your problem, you
              > >don't
              > >> >need
              > >> >additional licenses. Again, I am not an expert on licensing , last
              > >I
              > >> >knew,
              > >> >the WL licenses are not charged by instances but by CPUs. As long
              > >as
              > >> >you not
              > >> >adding more CPU you don't need additional license for WL. Please check
              > >> >with
              > >> >your account rep to verify that.
              > >> >
              > >> >Are we talking about a requirement where the "same" application to
              > >be
              > >> >accessed by both "internal" as well as the "external" clients? If
              > >so,
              > >> >a
              > >> >simple firewall configuration of allowing traffic from "internal"
              > >network
              > >> >to
              > >> >the "external" network only to WLS port would do the trick. Also make
              > >> >sure
              > >> >that the firewall only allows incoming traffic for the ones originated
              > >> >from
              > >> >"internal" network. There are other possible options, but I need to
              > >know
              > >> >more about your configuration.
              > >> >
              > >> >Last but not the least, if you had given the information to the group
              > >> >instead of sending personal email, you would have probably gotten
              > >faster
              > >> >response. There are a lot of good and experienced folks in this
              > >newsgroup.
              > >> >
              > >> >I don't mind being your friend at all, couple of Bud light would be
              > >a
              > >> >good
              > >> >start :)
              > >> >
              > >> >..raja
              > >> >
              > >> >"David Chen" <[email protected]> wrote in message
              > >> >news:[email protected]...
              > >> >> Good guess, Raja. We do have two NICs and two separate networks.
              > >I
              > >> >think
              > >> >> Mike's answer is correct according the documentation. However, in
              > >our
              > >> >case,
              > >> >> since we are using cluster, we have to specify "bindAddr" (is that
              > >> >right?).
              > >> >>
              > >> >> Unfortunately, I am not the David Chen from Dallas. But I would
              > >not
              > >> >mind
              > >> >to
              > >> >> be a friend of yours, Raja :)
              > >> >>
              > >> >> Thanks,
              > >> >>
              > >> >> David Chen
              > >> >>
              > >> >>
              > >> >>
              > >> >> "Raja Mukherjee" <[email protected]> wrote in message
              > >> >> news:[email protected]...
              > >> >> > If my guess is correct, they have two NICs and two separate
              > >> >> networks...let's
              > >> >> > see what are they really trying to achieve. I may have emails
              > >on
              > >> >my
              > >> >> mailbox
              > >> >> > (I know a David Chen from Dallas, is that you David??) which I
              > >can
              > >> >not
              > >> >> check
              > >> >> > right now...
              > >> >> >
              > >> >> > .raja
              > >> >> >
              > >> >> > "Mike Reiche" <[email protected]> wrote in message
              > >> >> > news:[email protected]...
              > >> >> > >
              > >> >> > > If you do not specify a bindAddr, it automatically binds to
              > >all
              > >> >IP
              > >> >> > addresses on
              > >> >> > > that machine.
              > >> >> > >
              > >> >> > > Mike
              > >> >> > >
              > >> >> > > "David Chen" <[email protected]> wrote:
              > >> >> > > >I know that it is possible to bind multiple IP addresses to
              > >multiple
              > >> >> > > >server
              > >> >> > > >instances. But is it possible to bind more than one IP address
              > >> >to
              > >> >just
              > >> >> > > >one
              > >> >> > > >server instance? If so, how can it be done?
              > >> >> > > >
              > >> >> > > >Thanks in advance,
              > >> >> > > >
              > >> >> > > >David Chen
              > >> >> > > >
              > >> >> > > >
              > >> >> > >
              > >> >> >
              > >> >> >
              > >> >>
              > >> >>
              > >> >
              > >> >
              > >>
              > >
              > >
              >
              

  • Addressing to more than one person

    How can I address an email to more than one person?
    feel frustrated to have to ask such a dummm question!

    I'm assuming that you are using Mail.app and not talking about using .mac mail or other mailserver via a web browser like Safari. If you are using the Mail client program, continue on, otherwise, never mind.
    If you don't already have an address book icon in your new message composition window (with that window being the active window (i.e., you clicked your mouse in it)), then...
    ...on the Menubar, go under View and select Customize Toolbar....
    Drag the AddressBook icon into the toolbar region of your new message composition window.
    This will provide you with the shortcut tool that I think you are seeking, to view and select names/email addresses stored in your local Address Book, from within the Mail application itself.
    You may need to repeat this process for the Reply, Reply All, Forward, and Redirect message composition windows, as well.
    (if this solves your problem, or is actually helpful towards arriving at a solution to your problem, please consider marking this reply as "helpful" or "solved," in addition to, if applicable, marking this question as "answered")

  • What do I do if one contact I need to enter has MORE THAN ONE ADDRESS

    What if I want to enter someone's home and work address under the same card? Can I do that? Or if someone has a summer house... Can I put more than one address under the same card and name?

    Can I put more than one address under the same card and name?
    Yes, but you can only send email to one of those addresses when you use that contact. That is, you have to pick a default address for the card when you send an email to that person or company.
    Mulder

  • Is there a way to authorize more than 5 computers.  We have three macs and 5 pc's in the house.

    Hello,  I have a MBP (mid 12 model), a brand new MBA (mid 13), and Mac Mini, four laptop PCs and 2 more Desktop PCs (I have teenage daughters and my wife)...
    I intend for one of the PC's to be a "server" I have a large library that certainly does not fit on the MBA, or the MBP.  To share the library the client has to be authorized. 
    I am currently using all of my authorizations...  is there a way to get more?  (I can't move content to another account I am assuming...)
    Thanks in Advance,
    Chris

    iTunes Store: About authorization and deauthorization - http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1420 - and another helpful post: https://discussions.apple.com/message/17828050
    "You can authorize up to five computers with your Apple ID."  I have not heard of a way to get more.  They probably set up a limit so people don't go around and authorize all their friends' and relatives' computers to one account, and somehow arrived at the number 5 to limit (probably because most families won't have more than one computer per person and 2 parents + 2.5 children rounds up to 5).

  • How do I select more than one email address on a Contacts card. I did it before but trouble with Yosemite

    Cannot select more than one email address at a time from Contacts. Before I upgraded to Yosemite, I could view all mail addresses in "All Contacts" and select multiple or single email addresses by "command and tap" for mail. Now I have to open each card and select one address at a time. I don't want to create groups just want to select the addresses I need at the time.

    i dont pay for hosting at all.. i just pay every two years to keep my domain name and with that i get free email forwarding and web forwarding... so i can create email addresses but need to forward them to somewhere else...
    i forward them to one of the POP3 email addresses i was given by my ISP...
    in entourage i set up two email accounts on the one identity so i can send email from the ISPs email or from my domain name email... now if someone sends me an email to my domain name email i get it twice... it only does this on my new mac though, it didnt do it on my old one...
    if i stop forwarding my emails then where will they go? i dont think ill get them, will i?
    very confused!
    Message was edited by: wob

  • When printing a list in Address Book, how can I select more than the default Attributes and keep them selected when I print again? I want to print ALL information for contacts so I have email address, notes, phone, company, title, etc all on one page.

    When printing a list in Address Book, how can I select more than the default Attributes and keep them selected when I print again? I want to print ALL information for contacts so I have email address, notes, phone, company, title, etc all on one page. I don't want to have to check off an additional 5 or 6 attributes each time I print out contact information. Is there a way to change the default setting for printing lists, so it is not just "phone," "photo," and "job title?"

    I have a user who wants to do this same thing. I did not find any way either to default the attributes to anything other than what you see the first time. Seems like such a trivial thing, hard to believe they do not allow it. I did find a program for this called iDress but I can't seem to download it from any links on the Internet. Not sure if it is free or not, but it was recommended by a link on the Mac support site.

  • Can i have more than one address book

    Is it possible to have more than one address book on my computer.  I would like to have 2 so I can use one for personal and use one for special projects

    Until I tunes match comes out it does not matter.  I cloud is for e mail, contacts, and calendars.  Your I cloud ID MUST be an @me.com ID.

Maybe you are looking for

  • TIF thumbnail incorrect in Windows Explorer (PSE 7 and 8)

    Sometimes when I save a TIF file (with "Discard Layers and Save a Copy" selected) the thumbnail shown in Windows Explorer is incorrect. The thumbnail appears to show only one layer from the PSD I have been working on, even if that layer no longer exi

  • IP over fiber channel

    Idle curiosity question: Does anyone know whether or not Netware or OES supports IP over fiber channel?

  • DB02:Space management/Segments/Most allocated extents in any segment

    Hi , in My SAP server: DB02 > Oracle Database Administration > Alerts > Alert monitor, there are few red alerts. 1. Space management > Segments >Most allocated extents in any segment  263  > 200   - 263 > 200: number of extents > threshold 03.03.2009

  • Anybody familiar with the details of implementing the Adobe PDF virtual printer?

    Hello, all. We need to implement a virtual printer similar to the legendary one by Adobe. The images processed by it will be detailed CAD drawing. Can a kind soul point me in the appropriate direction? For starters: what type of data (what format) is

  • Disable UCM Full-Text search (11.1.1.3.0)

    Hi All, We are having Oracle ECM module with IPM, UCM in 11.1.1.3.0 version. We are pumping data to UCM via IPM. We have configured our UCM as Full-Text search enabled. That is SearchIndexerEngineName=ORACLETEXTSEARCH But now we want to disable that